Magnet Material Choice

10
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Magnet Material Choice LCLS Undulator System Final LLP Pre-production Review 15-16 Nov 2004 Liz Moog

description

Magnet Material Choice. Liz Moog. LCLS Undulator System Final LLP Pre-production Review 15-16 Nov 2004. Potential vendors. Prequalified: Shin-Etsu Neomax (formerly Sumitomo Special Metals) Others: Outokumpu Vacuumschmelze Ugimag Dexter (representing Chinese manufacturer). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Magnet Material Choice

Page 1: Magnet Material Choice

A U.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Science LaboratoryOperated by The University of Chicago

Argonne National Laboratory

Office of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy

Magnet Material Choice

LCLS Undulator SystemFinal LLP Pre-production Review15-16 Nov 2004

Liz Moog

Page 2: Magnet Material Choice

2

Pioneering Science andTechnology

Office of Science U.S. Department

of Energy

Potential vendors

Prequalified:

• Shin-Etsu

• Neomax (formerly Sumitomo Special Metals)

Others:

• Outokumpu

• Vacuumschmelze

• Ugimag

• Dexter (representing Chinese manufacturer)

Page 3: Magnet Material Choice

3

Pioneering Science andTechnology

Office of Science U.S. Department

of Energy

• A significant issue for LCLS magnet choice is radiation resistance.

• Radiation resistance has been found to vary with the vendor

• Within a particular vendor’s line, higher coercivity is correlated to better radiation resistance.

Radiation resistance

Page 4: Magnet Material Choice

4

Pioneering Science andTechnology

Office of Science U.S. Department

of Energy

Some published radiation results

Label Material Br (T) Hcj (kA/m)

V411 VACODYM411 1.00 3260

V400 VACODYM400 1.10 2470

V396 VACODYM396 1.15 2150

N32 NEOMAX-32EH 1.11 2387

N35 NEOMAX-35EH 1.17 1989

N44 NEOMAX-44H 1.36 1273

C2300 CORMAX2300 0.93 796

Reprinted from Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A, Vol. 467-468, T. Bizen et al., “Demagnetization of undulator magnets irradiated by high energy electrons”, pp. 185-189 (2001), with permission from Elsevier.

Page 5: Magnet Material Choice

5

Pioneering Science andTechnology

Office of Science U.S. Department

of Energy

Shin-Etsu magnet gradesN39SH from Shin-Etsu was used for the prototype undulator, but

newer and better magnet grades are now available

Page 6: Magnet Material Choice

6

Pioneering Science andTechnology

Office of Science U.S. Department

of Energy

Neomax magnet gradesNeomax 38VH is equivalent to Shin-Etsu N39UH

Page 7: Magnet Material Choice

7

Pioneering Science andTechnology

Office of Science U.S. Department

of Energy

Newest grade availability / cost

• Neomax gave us quotes for 42AH and 44AH on a recent (summer 2004) magnet procurement.

• Cost was ~25% higher than for 38VH.

• Delivery schedule was 90 days longer (240 days vs 150 days).

• These grades require an ingredient that presents availability challenges.

• Neomax is presently challenged to meet customer demand; they are expanding production capability

Page 8: Magnet Material Choice

8

Pioneering Science andTechnology

Office of Science U.S. Department

of Energy

Heat treatment can improve NdFeB resistance

Radiation effect on 35EH magnets after different bake times at 142°C.

Longest bake is 24 hrs.

(Reprinted from Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A, Vol. 515, T. Bizen et al., “Baking effect for NdFeB magnets against demagnetization induced by high energy electrons”, pp. 850-2 (2003), with permission from Elsevier.)

Page 9: Magnet Material Choice

9

Pioneering Science andTechnology

Office of Science U.S. Department

of Energy

Compare Sm2Co17 and Nd2Fe14B

Neomax 27VH (220°C anneal)

Neomax 35EH (142°C anneal)

Sm2Co17 Nd2Fe14B

(T. Bizen, et al., Proceedings of 8th Int’l. Conf. on Synchrotron Radiation Instrum., 25-29Aug 2003, San Francisco, CA (2004, Amer. Inst. of Physics) p. 167)

Br comparison:

27VH: 1.02 - 1.10 T

35EH: 1.17 - 1.25 T

240HR, 225HR: 1.11 T

Reprinted with permission.

Page 10: Magnet Material Choice

10

Pioneering Science andTechnology

Office of Science U.S. Department

of Energy

SmCo magnets

• SmCo magnets were considered for the LCLS undulator

• More resistance to radiation

• But weaker magnetically

• More brittle to handle

• Long-lived activation

• We have no experience with it (yet)

The decision was made to opt for the known material, NdFeB.