MAGNA Int. and NAFTA Presented by: Mariana Garcia V Leanne Hoffart Chris McEwen Faisal Niazi.
-
Upload
gary-howard -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of MAGNA Int. and NAFTA Presented by: Mariana Garcia V Leanne Hoffart Chris McEwen Faisal Niazi.
MAGNA Int. and NAFTA
Presented by:• Mariana Garcia V
• Leanne Hoffart• Chris McEwen
• Faisal Niazi
Who we are?
• Founded by Frank Stronach (1954)
• Now:68 plants15,000
employeesSales of C$
2.4 billion
19921992
• Fast growth of the Automotive Industry
• Penetration of North American Market by Japanese producers (+300 plants)
• NAFTA is signed (Canada-USA-Mexico)• MAGNA is looking for a long-term
growth opportunity
19921992
MAGNA’s Competitive Strategy
• Full line supplier• Target OEMs• Employee
empowerment• Decentralized
Structure• Innovation=Competit
ive differentiation• Knowledge of the
business
COSMA’s Automotive Group
• Metal stamping, rust proofing and sunroofs
• Ability to design and construct its own die-making tools
• Capital intensive-complex+expensive tool
• Require automotive grade steel
• Opened MAGNA’s first Mexican division servicing VW
The big ??MAGNA is looking for a long-
term growth. MAGNA is already expanded all over Canada and USA. MAGNA wants to expand to new
markets… Is MEXICO the best option?
Mexican Economy, Culture and Workforce (1992)
• Solid Economy• Expected growth in automotive industry• Predicted rise in standard of living• OEMs in Mexico• Large market• Low wages• Large labor force (26.2 M)• Personal Relationships important• Government promoting foreign investment• Lax enforcement of labor + environmental
standard
Problems Entering Mexican Market
• High cost of entering• High training costs• Necessity to find
steel supplier in Mexico
• Relocation of engineers to Mexico
• Increased Transportation costs
Porter Analysis
Threat of Substitute
LOW
Threat of New Entrants
LOW
Internal Rivalry
HIGH
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
HIGH
Bargaining Power of Buyers
LOW
Effects of NAFTA
• Tariffs• Trade Balancing• Local Content• Equity Restriction
Projected Porter Analysis
Threat of Substitute
LOW
Threat of New Entrants
MODERATE
Internal Rivalry
HIGH
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
HIGH
Bargaining Power of Buyers
LOW
Alternatives
• Remain in Canada and US markets• Expand into Mexico• Expand into a different country• Merge of partnership with another
company
Recommendation
• Expand COSMA
• Upgrade the “Puebla” facility
Investment Strategy
• Capital intensive industry
• Must be aggressive• Can’t go
incrementally in need to make it full Market penetration to capitalize
QUESTIONSQUESTIONS
??