MAFAP: Analysis of Policy Context

26
MAFAP: Analysis of Policy Context Module 2.2

description

MAFAP: Analysis of Policy Context . Module 2.2. Commodity Price Analysis and Government Policies. Objective: To examine commodity market price incentives and analyze/evaluate the linkages of government policies including government investment policies to commodity price incentives. . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of MAFAP: Analysis of Policy Context

Page 1: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

MAFAP: Analysis of Policy Context

Module 2.2

Page 2: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Commodity Price Analysis and Government Policies

Objective:To examine commodity market price incentives and analyze/evaluate the linkages of government policies including government investment policies to commodity price incentives.

Page 3: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

The goal of the this presentation is to briefly: Review the rational/goals of government policies.

Review key policies and discuss their likely impacts on

commodity price incentives.

Stress the tradeoffs in policies (between various objectives such

as efficiency, equity, etc.).

Commodity Price Analysis and Government Policies

Page 4: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

• There is the belief that government intervention can accelerate

growth.

• To correct market failure/imperfection (examples of credit

market in rural areas, market power, etc.).

• To reduce the impacts of externalities (examples of

environmental pollution, over utilization of resources creating

soil erosion, etc.).

Rationale for government policies

Page 5: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

The impacts depend on:

• Objectives or goals of policy makers.

• They are subject to constraints of the economic realities.

• Depend on the instruments that governments use.

Note:

There are always tradeoffs in meeting different policy goals (we discuss the issue

at the end of this session)

Impacts of government policies

Page 6: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

General goals of government policies (1/2)

• Efficient resource allocations to improve agricultural productivity is usually

a key policy goal.

• Globalization of trade, which is based on comparative advantage in

production, makes efficiency of production mandatory if a country plans to

get a sizeable market share in the highly competitive global trade market.

• Equity of the income distribution (based on targeted policies toward

special groups) to achieve more even income distribution is an important

policy goal.

Page 7: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

General goals of government policies (2/2)

• The goal of equity is that governments like to reduce the gap

between low and high income population to reduce poverty and

maintain social harmony.

• Security goal aims at providing economic stability and in the

case of food security refers to the availability of food at

affordable and stable prices for all.

Question: What are the key policy goals in Kenya?

Page 8: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Key constraints limiting impacts of agricultural policies

• Supply: domestic production is limited by resources, technologies,

relative input prices, and management capabilities.

• Demand: domestic consumption is limited by population, income,

tastes, and relative product prices.

• World Prices limit imports to increase domestic supply and to

export to increase markets for domestic production.

Question: what are the key constraints in agricultural production in Kenya?

Page 9: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Types of policies affecting agricultural commodities:

• Agricultural price policies: such policies tend to be commodity specific, either targeted to one or more commodities produced or can be targeted to agricultural inputs.

• Macro-economic policies are country-wide policies and tend to affect all sectors of the economy.

• Government investments are expenditures from the public budget. They can have different affect on diverse agricultural groups depending on the specific areas where the investment occurs.

• Foreign government policies through aid and technical assistance

Page 10: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Impacts of Agricultural Price Policies

• Agricultural price policies will affect producers, consumers, and

the government budget.

• Depending on the type of policy, there will be transfers between

two or all three groups.

• This means in all cases one group loses and at least one other

group benefits.

Question: what are the key recent agricultural policy initiatives in Kenya?

Page 11: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Taxes and subsidies

For agricultural commodities such policies result in transfers

between the public budget and producers and consumers.

Taxes transfer resources to the government, whereas subsidies

transfer resources away from the government.

Example of fixed producer price policy (higher than the

international prices): gain for producers; loss for consumers;

increase in budget outlay that should be compensated by higher

taxes.

Page 12: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Price stabilization policies

Such policies are adopted because of the high production variation

causing market prices to fluctuate substantially from one production

cycle to the next.

Policies adopted for this purpose, include trade restrictions, price

fixing, rationing, and storage schemes.

Crop insurance and futures and options markets are institutions that

reduce the uncertainty of prices and income but these institutions

are not adopted by most developing countries.

Page 13: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

International trade restrictions

• Taxes or quotas that limit either imports or exports changes

domestic price levels and has impacts on both producers and

consumers depending on the policy.

• Import restrictions, for example, raise domestic prices above

relative to world prices, while export restrictions lower domestic

prices compare to world price.

Question: what are the main policy tradeoffs?

Page 14: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Factor price policies: traded and non-traded

These policies directly affect agricultural costs of production. The case of traded inputs such as fertilizer use is straight forward i.e. domestic prices are compared with international prices to estimate taxes/subsidies.

The non-traded inputs include land, labor, and capital. Land and labor costs, in general, account for a large share of the production costs of most agricultural commodities.

Policies that can influence such costs include:

• land rental rates, minimum wage,

• interest rates, control of land use, and

• water use/cost policies.

Page 15: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Question and discussion

1. Question: what are the key policy goals in Kenya?

2. Question: what are the key constraints in agricultural production

in Kenya?

3. Question: what are the key recent agricultural policy initiatives in

Kenya?

4. Question: what are the main policy tradeoffs?

Page 16: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Macro-economic Policies

• Three categories of macro-economic policies affect agriculture:

Monetary policies

Fiscal policies

Exchange rate policies

Page 17: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Monetary and fiscal policies

• These policies influence all sectors of the economy. The key is

their impacts on the rate of price inflation (consumer or

producer prices).

• Monetary policies leading to increase supply of money leads to

faster demand growth for goods thus puts pressure on inflation.

• Similarly, inflation increases when government deficits are

covered by expanding supply of money.

Page 18: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Exchange rate policies

• Exchange rates affect agricultural prices and costs of tradable

goods (imports and exports) and in the estimations of price

incentives, exchange rate misalignment needs to be estimated.

• The exchange rate influences the price of an agricultural

commodity because the domestic price (in local currency) of a

tradable commodity is equal to the world price (in foreign

currency) times the exchange rate (the ratio of domestic to

foreign currency).

Page 19: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Public Expenditure Policies Influencing Agriculture

• Government budgetary resources can be spent on agriculture directly or indirectly to improve incomes, increase productivity and to reduce transaction costs.

• The most common direct expenditures include production and input subsidies, direct payments, investments in infrastructure (on and off farm), investment in human capital (agricultural education and training, etc.), and in agriculture research and technology (and extension) while indirect expenditures include rural development measures (rural infrastructure, education, health).

Page 20: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Public expenditures on input subsidies

Input subsidies are implemented to enable farmers to use inputs and technologies that are known to be effective and intend to address in relatively simple manner otherwise difficult problems of developing input markets and associated financial services to small farmers.

But inputs subsidies treat the symptoms rather than origins of market failures, distort resource allocation and are often costly and difficult to sustain without cutting expenditures on important public goods.

Question/discussion: when and how to use input subsidies (SMART input subsidies)

Page 21: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Such investments benefit both producers and consumers.

These investments are very important for production growth;

they tend to have strong long-term impacts although difficult to

measure in terms of return to specific commodity in a given year.

Question/discussion: public investment in R&D versus government policy of technology transfer (the example of biotech)

Public investments in research and technology (R&D)

Page 22: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Public investments in infrastructure

• Infrastructure investment improves returns to producers or lowers costs of production.

• Infrastructure investment includes investment in roads, ports, and irrigation networks (and can be on and off farm). Such investments tend to be targeted and benefit mostly the producers and consumers who live in those regions.

Question/discussion: how to measure annual agricultural benefits of investment in irrigation network that has initial high costs with

mid-term maintenance costs?

Page 23: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

These include wide variations of policies and include investment to improve the skill levels and health of producers and consumers.

Investments in formal schools, training and extension centers, public health facilities, and clinics and hospitals are examples of such investment.

These investments are very important for long-term development, but their short-terms impacts on prices difficult to measure.

Public investments in human capital

Question/discussion: direct versus indirect investment in human capital; the case of extension service: quality versus quantity of investment.

Page 24: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Discussion on Policy Tradeoffs

• Often gains for one policy goal result in losses for another (example

of price subsidy and budget deficit or consumer and producer price

subsidy).

• Assigning weights to objectives of government policies are value

judgments but the goal of analysis is to identify the appropriate

tradeoffs between policies.

• Quantitative analyses are critical for policymakers to examine the

impacts of their policies (producers, consumers, budget, efficiency,

equity, etc.).

Page 25: MAFAP:  Analysis of Policy Context

Question and discussion:

1. Question/discussion: when and how to use input subsidies (SMART input subsidies)

2. Question/discussion: public investment in R&D versus government policy of technology transfer (the example of biotech)

3. Question/discussion: how to measure annual agricultural benefits of investment in irrigation network that has initial high costs with mid-term maintenance costs?

4. Question/discussion: direct versus indirect investment in human capital; the case of extension service: quality versus quantity of investment.