M5 evaluating and competitive position

31
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 4 Chapter Title 15/e PPT Evaluating a Company’s Resources and Competitive Position Screen graphics created by: Jana F. Kuzmicki, Ph.D. Troy University-Florida Region

description

 

Transcript of M5 evaluating and competitive position

Page 1: M5 evaluating and competitive position

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

44

Chapter TitleChapter Title

15/e PPT15/e PPT

Evaluating a Company’s

Resources and Competitive

Position

Screen graphics created by:Jana F. Kuzmicki, Ph.D.

Troy University-Florida Region

Page 2: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-2

1. How well is the company’spresent strategy working?

2. What are the company’s resourcestrengths and weaknesses and itsexternal opportunities and threats?

3. Are the company’s prices andcosts competitive?

4. Is the company competitively strongeror weaker than key rivals?

5. What strategic issues meritfront-burner managerial attention?

Company Situation Analysis:The Key Questions

Page 3: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-3

Fig. 4.1: Identifying the Components ofa Single-Business Company’s Strategy

Page 4: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-4

Question 1: How Well Is the Company’sPresent Strategy Working?

Must begin by understanding what the strategy is Identify competitive approach

Low-cost leadership Differentiation Focus on a particular market niche

Determine competitive scope Broad or narrow geographic market coverage? In how many stages of industry’s production/distribution

chain does the company operate?

Examine recent strategic moves Identify functional strategies

Key Considerations Key Considerations

Page 5: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-5

Qualitative assessment –Is the strategy well-conceived?

Covers all the bases?

Internally consistent?

Makes sense?

Timely and in step with marketplace?

Quantitative assessment – What are the results?

Is company achieving its financial and strategic objectives?

Is company an above-average industry performer?

Approaches to Assess How Wellthe Present Strategy Is Working

Page 6: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-6

Trend in sales and market share Acquiring and/or retaining customers Trend in profit margins Trend in net profits, ROI, and EVA Overall financial strength and credit ranking Efforts at continuous improvement activities Trend in stock price and stockholder value Image and reputation with customers Leadership role(s) – Technology, quality,

innovation, e-commerce, etc.

Key Indicators of How Wellthe Strategy Is Working

Page 7: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-7

Page 8: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-8

Page 9: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-9

S W O TS W O T represents the first letter in SS trengths

WW eaknesses

OO pportunities

TT hreats

For a company’s strategy to be well-conceived, it must be Matched to its resource strengths and weaknesses

Aimed at capturing its best market opportunities and erecting defenses against external threats to its well-being

S W

O T

Question 2: What Are the Company’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats ?

Page 10: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-10

A strength is something a firm does well or an attribute that enhances its competitiveness Valuable skills, competencies, or capabilities Valuable physical assets Valuable human assets Valuable organizational assets Valuable intangible assets Important competitive capabilities An attribute placing a company in a position of market

advantage Alliances or cooperative ventures with partners

Resource strengths and competitivecapabilities are competitive assets!

Identifying Resource Strengthsand Competitive Capabilities

Page 11: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-11

Competencies vs. Core Competencies vs. Distinctive Competencies

A competence is the product of organizational learning and experience and represents real proficiency in performing an internal activity

A core competence is a well-performedinternal activity central (not peripheral or incidental) to a company’s competitivenessand profitability

A distinctive competence is a competitively valuable activity a company performs better than its rivals

Page 12: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-12

Identifying Resource Weaknessesand Competitive Deficiencies

A weakness is something a firm lacks, does poorly, or a condition placing it at a disadvantage

Resource weaknesses relate to

Inferior or unproven skills,expertise, or intellectual capital

Lack of important physical,organizational, or intangible assets

Missing capabilities in key areas

Resource weaknesses and deficienciesare competitive liabilities!

Page 13: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-13

Page 14: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-14

Page 15: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-15

Identifying a Company’sMarket Opportunities

Opportunities most relevant to acompany are those offering

Good match with its financial andorganizational resource capabilities

Best prospects for profitable long-term growth

Potential for competitive advantage

Page 16: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-16

Identifying External Threats

Emergence of cheaper/better technologies

Introduction of better products by rivals

Entry of lower-cost foreign competitors

Onerous regulations

Rise in interest rates

Potential of a hostile takeover

Unfavorable demographic shifts

Adverse shifts in foreign exchange rates

Political upheaval in a country

Page 17: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-17

Fig. 4.2: The Three Steps of SWOT Analysis

Page 18: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-18

Assessing whether a firm’s costs are competitive with those of rivals is a crucial part of company situation analysis

Key analytical tools

Value chain analysis

Benchmarking

Question 3: Are the Company’sPrices and Costs Competitive?

Page 19: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-19

A company’s business consists of all activities undertaken in designing, producing, marketing, delivering, and supporting its product or service

All these activities that a company performs internally combine to form a value chain—so-called because the underlying intent of a company’s activities is to do things that ultimately create value for buyers

The value chain contains two types of activities

Primary activities (where most ofthe value for customers is created)

Support activities that facilitateperformance of the primary activities

Concept: Company Value Chain

Page 20: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-20

Fig. 4.3: A Representative Company Value Chain

Page 21: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-21

Fig. 4.4: Representative Value Chain for an Entire Industry

Page 22: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-22

Developing Data to Measure a Company’s Cost Competitiveness

After identifying key value chain activities, the next step involves determining costs of performing specific value chain activities using activity-based costing

Appropriate degree of disaggregation depends on Economics of activities

Value of comparing narrowly definedversus broadly defined activities

Guideline – Develop separate costestimates for activities Having different economics

Representing a significant or growing proportion of costs

Page 23: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-23

Determining whether a company’s costs are in line with those of rivals requires Measuring how a company’s costs compare with those

of rivals activity-by-activity

Requires having accounting data to measure costof each value chain activity

Activity-based costing entails Defining expense categories according

to specific activities performed and Assigning costs to the activity

responsible for creating the cost

Activity-Based Costing: A KeyTool in Analyzing Costs

Page 24: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-24

Page 25: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-25

Focuses on cross-company comparisons of how certain activities are performed and costs associated with these activities Purchase of materials Payment of suppliers Management of inventories Getting new products to market Performance of quality control Filling and shipping of customer orders Training of employees Processing of payrolls

Benchmarking Costs ofKey Value Chain Activities

Page 26: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-26

Fig. 4.5: Translating Company Performance of Value Chain Activities into Competitive Advantage

Page 27: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-27

Overall competitive position involvesanswering two questions

How does a company rank relativeto competitors on each importantfactor that determines market success?

Does a company have a netcompetitive advantage or disadvantagevis-à-vis major competitors?

Question 4: Is the Company Strongeror Weaker than Key Rivals?

Page 28: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-28

1. List industry key success factors and other relevant measures of competitive strength

2. Rate firm and key rivals on each factor using rating scale of 1 to 10 (1 = very weak; 5 = average; 10 = very strong)

3. Decide whether to use a weighted or unweighted rating system (a weighted system is superior because chosen strength measures are unlikely to be equally important)

4. Sum individual ratings to get an overall measure of competitive strength for each rival

5. Based on overall strength ratings, determine overall competitive position of firm

Assessing a Company’sCompetitive Strength vs. Key Rivals

Page 29: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-29

Page 30: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-30

Page 31: M5 evaluating and competitive position

4-31

Based on results of both industry and competitive analysis and an evaluation of a company’s competitiveness, what items should beon a company’s “worry list”?

Requires thinking strategically about Pluses and minuses in the industry

and competitive situation Company’s resource strengths and weaknesses and

attractiveness of its competitive position

A “good” strategy must address “what to do”about each and every strategic issue!

Question 5: What Strategic IssuesMerit Managerial Attention?