M E Environmental Management safety performance cleanup closure The U.S. Department of Energy...

MEEnvironmental Environmental ManagementManagement safety performance cleanup closure

The U.S. Department of EnergyEnvironmental Management

Intergovernmental Meeting Snowbird, Utah

EM Budget Overview

Cynthia RheaumeEM Director of Budget

October 17, 2007

2ME

Environmental Environmental ManagementManagement safety performance cleanup closure

DOE’s Waste Disposal ComplexHanford

Pantex Plant

Brookhaven

Knolls

Princeton

Savannah River

Oak Ridge

Inhalation Toxicology Research InstituteGeneral Atomics

Energy Technology Engineering Center

SandiaStanford Linear Accelerator Center

Lawrence Berkeley Nat’l Lab

Lawrence Livermore Nat’l Lab

Ames Ashtabula

Argonne Nat’l Lab

Fermi

Portsmouth

Paducah

Mound

BCL

Bettis

Kansas CityNevada Test Site

Idaho NationalLab

CERCLA Disposal Facility

Fernald

Regional Low Level Waste Disposal Facility

DOE Generator Site (no on-site disposal facility)

Low Level Waste Operations Disposal Facility

Mixed Low Level Waste Operations Disposal Facility

Legend

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for Transuranic waste disposal

Los Alamos Nat’l Lab

Sandia

WIPP

West Valley

Yucca Mountain repository for High Level Waste/Spent Nuclear Fuel disposal

Sites are closed

Rocky Flats

3ME


EM Funding History

$6.4$6.7 $7.0 $7.0 $7.3 $6.6

$6.2 $5.7 $5.6 $6.0 $6.2 $6.2

$1.0

$2.0

$3.0

$4.0

$5.0

$6.0

$7.0

$8.0

FY01FY02

FY03FY04

FY05FY06

FY07 C

R

FY08 R

eques

t

FY09 T

arge

t

FY10 T

arge

t

FY11 T

arge

t

FY12 T

arge

t

$ in billions

4ME


Major EM AccomplishmentsSite Completions• 86 out of 108 sitesLiquid Tank Waste• Long-lead procurement and construction underway on Waste Treatment Plant,

Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Facility, and Salt Waste Processing Facility• All empty unused tanks grouted at Idaho National Laboratory• Over 2500 cans of vitrified high-level waste produced for disposalOther Waste• TRU / WIPP – Disposed of over 50,000 cubic meters of contact-handled

TRU waste – Initiated disposal of remote-handled TRU waste

• Low-Level and Mixed Low-Level – Approaching 1 million cubic meters disposed

5ME


Uranium/Plutonium

• Initiated consolidation of weapons-usable surplus Pu from Hanford, Los Alamos, and Livermore to Savannah River

• DUF 6 Conversion Facilities at 70% completion– all DUF6 cylinders now on-site

• Long-lead procurement and construction underway on Building 3019 U-233 Conversion Project

Other Remediation

• Decontaminated and decommissioned over 1700 nuclear, radioactive and industrial facilities

• Stabilized more than 100 contaminated groundwater plumes, and remediated over 6,500 release sites

Major EM Accomplishments (cont’d)

6ME


EM Risk-Based Priorities

Highest Risk-Based Priorities

• Minimum safety and essential services across EM cleanup sites

• Radioactive tank waste waste storage, treatment, and disposal (including technology development and deployment activities in support of high-level waste)

• Spent nuclear fuel storage, receipts and disposition

• Special nuclear material storage, processing, and disposition

• High priority groundwater remediation (selected Hanford, Paducah and Los Alamos plumes)

• Solid waste (transuranic and mixed/low-level waste) treatment, storage, and disposal

Lower Risk-Based Priorities

• Soil and groundwater remediation

• Nuclear facility D&D

• Non-nuclear facility D&D

7ME


Near-Term Scheduled Site Closures

•Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory NM•Pantex Plant TX•Lawrence Livermore National CA

Laboratory-Site 300 •Miamisburg Environmental OH

Management Project

•Sandia National Laboratories NM•Argonne National Laboratory-East IL

•Stanford Linear Accelerator CA

2008

2009

2010

LLNL (Site 300)

Stanford

SNL

Inhalation Lab

Pantex

ANL-E

Miamisburg

8ME


FY 2008 Budget Composition

31.9%

2.9%

15.7%14.0%

1.7%

9.1%

17.0%

7.7%

Radioactive Liquid WasteStabilization/Disposition

Spent Nuclear Fuel Stabilization/Disposition

Solid Waste Stabilization/Disposition

Special Nuclear Materials and Safeguards &Security

Site Closure

Soil and Water Remediation

Decontamination/Decommissioning

Other

$5.655B

Other is comprised of: Program Direction, Technology Development, Contribution to the D&D Fund, Uranium/Thorium Reimbursements, Headquarters, and Community and Regulatory Support

9ME


FY 2008 Budget StatusFY 2007 Operating

PlanFY 2008 Request

FY 2008 House Mark

FY 2008 Senate Mark

Defense Environmental 5,731,240 5,363,905 5,768,011 5,690,380

Non-Defense Environmental 349,687 180,937 286,041 205,437

Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund 556,606 573,509 618,759 573,509

Subtotal, EM 6,637,533 6,118,351 6,672,811 6,469,326

Offset -452,000 -463,000 -464,450 -473,000Total, EM 6,185,533 5,655,351 6,208,361 5,996,326

10ME


EM Out-Year Budget Targets

Out-Year Targets vs. Current Baseline Requirements

$5,794

$7,618$7,849$7,547$7,492$7,175

$6,222$5,655

$6,186$6,589

$6,165$5,996$5,569

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

$9,000

FY 2006

FY 2007

FY 2008

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

FY 2012

$ in

Mil

lion

s

Baseline Requirements Out-Year Five Year Plan Targets

5-Year Shortfall($ in millions)

FY 2008 $1,520FY 2009 $1,923FY 2010 $1,551FY 2011 $1,684FY 2012 $1,396

$8,074Cumulative 5-Year Total:

* FY 2006/2007 baseline data not available

11ME


• Maintain and demand highest safety performance

• Assure effective identification and management of risks– Performance– Dealing with increased scope and requirements– Independent reviews – technical, cost, and schedule

• Validate project costs, schedules, and assumptions

• Improve senior management focus on project execution

• Provide additional training for Federal managers and staff to enhance project management, and acquisition skills

• Implement more effective acquisition process– Contract type– Fee structure

• Ensure real-time feedback and application of lessons learned

• Ensure proper organizational alignment of functions, authorities, and people

Management Initiatives

12ME


EM Program FY 2008 Budget

Legend:

Over $1 billion $300 million to $1 billion $50 million to $300 million

Kentucky

New York

Washington

SouthCarolina

Idaho

NewMexico

Tennessee

Ohio

EM Budget$5.7 Billion

Nevada

Statea

FY 2008 EM Budget Request

($ in Millions)

Washington 2,003 South Carolina 1,406 Ohio 313 Idaho 520 Tennessee 444 New Mexico 384 Kentucky 143 New York 107 Nevada 86

aTable only includes states with $50M or greater in EM funding.

13ME


Corporate Performance Measures

100% 6,314Number of Containers

6,960 7,192 97% 7,413Number of Containers

100% 107,828 kg Bulk

11,858 17,116 2% 698,243 Metric Tons

0 1.4 million 2% 88 million gallons

2 9 4% 239Number of

tanks

2,649 2,861 14% 20,004Number of Containers

2,127 2,127 88% 2,417MT Heavy

Metal

43,999 54,466 40% 135,353 cubic meters

1,023,542 1,040,679 79% 1,316,619 cubic meters

11 11 85% 13Number of

MAAs

83 83 20% 407Number of Facilities

314 337 40% 848Number of Facilities

1,410 1,560 47% 3,298Number of Facilities

6,541 6,781 65% 10,470Number of

Release Sites

86 89 82% 108Number of

Sites

UnitsProjected to be

Completed ThroughFY 2008

Percent Projected to be

Completed Through FY 2008

LifecycleTotal

Completed ThroughFiscal Year-end 2007

Material Access Areas (MAAs) eliminated

Depleted Uranium and Uranium packaged for disposition

Liquid Waste eliminated

Liquid Waste Tanks closed

High Level Waste Packaged for final disposition

Performance Measure

Plutonium packaged for long-term disposition

Enriched Uranium packaged for disposition

Plutonium and Uranium Residues packaged for disposition

Geographic Sites Eliminated

Measure Complete

Measure Complete

Nuclear Facility D&D Completions

Radioactive Facility D&D Completions

Industrial Facility D&D Completions

Remediation Complete

SNF Packaged for final disposition

Transuranic Waste disposed

Low Level /Mixed Low Level Waste disposed

14ME


Summary

• Budget based on prioritized risk reduction

• Ensure all EM activities are conducted safely, and in accordance with environmental laws and regulations

• Strive for operational excellence through technology, process improvement, innovation, effective project management, and high standards/accountability

• Maintain effective communications with stakeholders

• Accomplish our mission through partnering with industry and other stakeholders

• New and improved EM website at www.em.doe.gov

M E Environmental Management safety performance cleanup closure The U.S. Department of Energy...

Documents

Transcript of M E Environmental Management safety performance cleanup closure The U.S. Department of Energy...