LU 2013 01 18 · !!!!!LUXEMBOURG! Country!Report! SURVEY REPORT Progress in energy efficiency...

8
LUXEMBOURG Country Report * Energy Efficiency in Europe Assessment of Energy Efficiency Action Plans and Policies in EU Member States 2013

Transcript of LU 2013 01 18 · !!!!!LUXEMBOURG! Country!Report! SURVEY REPORT Progress in energy efficiency...

Page 1: LU 2013 01 18 · !!!!!LUXEMBOURG! Country!Report! SURVEY REPORT Progress in energy efficiency policies in the EU Member States - the experts perspective Findings from the Energy Efficiency

 

                           LUXEMBOURG  

Country  Report  

SURVEY REPORT

Progress in energy efficiency policies in the EU Member States -

the experts perspective

Findings from the Energy Efficiency Watch Project 2012

Christiane Egger (O.Ö. Energiesparverband) with contributions by Reinhold Priewasser, Michaela Kloiber (University of Linz) Nils Borg (eceee), Dominique Bourges (Fedarene), Peter Schilken (Energy Cities)

*

Energy  Efficiency  in  Europe  Assessment  of  Energy  Efficiency  Action  Plans  and  

Policies  in  EU  Member  States  2013  

Page 2: LU 2013 01 18 · !!!!!LUXEMBOURG! Country!Report! SURVEY REPORT Progress in energy efficiency policies in the EU Member States - the experts perspective Findings from the Energy Efficiency

 

2  

This  report   is  one  of  27  country  reports  published  within  the  Energy-­‐Efficiency-­‐Watch  project  and  assesses   both  ambition  and  quality  of  EU  Member  States´  energy  efficiency  action  plans  and  policy  implementation  (see  more  at  www.energy-­‐efficiency-­‐watch.org).    

According   to  Luxembourg  experts,   Luxembourg  has  made  good  progress   in  energy  efficiency  policies   since   the  NEEAP  1   (country  progress   indicator:  3  out  of  27).  More   than  40  %  believe  that   the   ambition   of   the   energy   policies   is   general   rather   high.   The   analysis   of   the   NEEAP,  however,   comes   to   slightly   different   conclusions.   The   governance   framework   and   the   policy  package   for   buildings   are   very   promising.   However,   the   remaining   sectors   have   still   great  potential   for   improvement,   hence   the   overall   rating   based   on   the   NEEAP   would   be   rather  medium.  

According   to   the   NEEAP,   Luxembourg   expects   to   realize   14.1%   savings   by   2016   and   thus   to  exceed   the  ESD   target  provided   that  all   planned  measures  are   implemented.  Strength  of   the  Luxembourg  governance   framework   is   the  widespread   availability   of  advice  and   information  through  energy  agencies  and  information  points  at  national,  regional  and  municipal  level.    

The  sectoral  assessment  of  policies  is  as  follows:    

• In   a   sectoral   perspective,   the   public   sector   mainly   acts   as   a   role   model   with   regard   to  buildings.   The   policy   package   put   in   place   for   the   buildings   sector   as   a   whole   is  comprehensive   and   exemplary.   The   strength   of   the   policy   package   is   the   availability   of  training  and  education  programmes  for  professionals  of  the  buildings  sector.    

• The   policy   package   for   appliances   is   mainly   based   on   the   EU   Ecodesign   and   EU   Energy  Labelling   Directive   and   complemented   by   a   financial   incentive   for   the   purchase   of  refrigerators  and  information  tools.    

• The  policy  package  for  industry  comprises,  amongst  others,  a  voluntary  agreement  between  the  government  and  the  Luxembourg  industry,  a  plan  to  promote  cross-­‐cutting  technologies  and   economic   incentives.   Obligations   and   commitments   for   energy   audits   or   technology  phase-­‐out/in  are  not  explicitly  mentioned  in  the  NEEAP.  Luxembourg  furthermore  applies  the  EU  minimum  tax  rates  for  gas  and  electricity  for  business  use  while  other  Member  States  go  beyond  these  minimum  rates.  

• The   transport   sector   is   a   very  weak   part   of   the   NEEAP.   Only   road   transport   is   taken   into  account  and  the  measures  mostly  fulfil  only  minimum  EU  requirements.   It   is  advised  not  to  except  the  transit  traffic  from  the  NEEAP.    

The  energy  efficiency  policy  can  be  considered  to  be  of  a  comparatively  high  quality,  especially  based  on  the  expert  survey.  Improvements  could  be  the  following:  

• Luxembourg   has   made   good   progress   over   recent   years,   but   considerable   potential   for  further  improvements  of  energy  efficiency  is  still  available  

• The  governance  framework  and  the  policy  package  for  buildings  may  serve  as  good  practice  example.  

• In  the  field  of  buildings,  the  comprehensive  education  &  training  offer  can  be  highlighted  as  a  best  practice  

• As   to  the  overall  governance   framework   it   is  advisable   to  define  a  target   that  goes  beyond  2020  

• With  regard  to  the  transport  sector  it  is  recommended  to  consider  public  transport  and  non-­‐motorized   transport   besides   individual   road   transport.   In   addition,   planning   instruments,  information   and   advice   and   more   elaborated   regulatory   instruments   could   complement  economic  incentives.  

Introd

uctio

n  Sectoral  Assessm

ent  

Conclusion

s  Summary  Assessment

Page 3: LU 2013 01 18 · !!!!!LUXEMBOURG! Country!Report! SURVEY REPORT Progress in energy efficiency policies in the EU Member States - the experts perspective Findings from the Energy Efficiency

 

3  

long-­‐term  strategy  

other  actors  involved  

energy-­‐agencies  

coordina[on/financing  

energy  services  

horizontal  measures  

MRV  

   

Public  Sector  

Comprehensiveness  of  policy  package  

Long-­‐term  EE  target(s)  and  strategy  

• Luxembourg  refers  to  the  EU  target  of  a  20%  increase  in  energy  efficiency  

Involvement  of  non-­‐governmental  and  market  actors,  and  sub-­‐national  authorities  

• It  is  planned  to  introduce  a  quality  energy  management  system  for  municipalities;  

• An  eco-­‐innovation  network  supports  the  different  players  in  the  field  of  environmental  technologies  

Energy  agencies  and  climate  protection  agencies  

• Luxembourg  has  one  national  and  one  regional  energy  agency;  

• In  early  2011,  energy  information  points  had  been  created  in  half  of  the  municipalities  

EE  mechanisms  for  overall  coordination  and  financing  

• Energy  efficiency  is  mainly  funded  through  the  national  budget  

Favourable  framework  conditions  for  energy  services  

• A  model  contract  is  being  prepared  for  energy  service  contracting  of  the  public  sector  

• Nothing  has  already  been  implemented,  only  planning  phase  and  only  related  to  the  public  sector  

Horizontal  measures   • Voluntary  agreements  on  EE  improvement  have  been  concluded  with  industry  

Monitoring,  reporting  and  verification  

• The  MRV  distinguishes  clearly  between  early,  new  and  planned  measures;  

• Bottom-­‐up  methods  are  used  to  quantify  savings  

Overarching  Energy  Efficiency  Governance  Framework  

Comprehensiveness  of  policy  package  

Public  sector  strategy  

• Luxembourg  has  drafted  a  plan  for  the  progressive  introduction  of  sustainable  consumption  and  production  models  

• A  pact  between  the  state  and  municipalities  is  planned  

Role  model,  transparency,  and  demonstration  

• The  public  sector  aims  for  low-­‐energy  buildings  and  constructs  plus  energy  buildings  for  demonstration  purposes;  

• Public  awareness  and  acceptance  campaigns  have  been  unndertaken  over  the  past  five  years;  

• The  public  sector  aims  to  introduce  energy  service  contract  

Public  procurement  • A  working  group  of  the  Ministry  for  Sustainable  Development  is  working  on  the  implementation  of  sustainable  public  procurement  

Public  buildings  

• The  public  sector  aims  for  the  highest  achievable  level  of  energy  efficiency;  Plus-­‐energy  buildings  are  to  be  built  for  demonstration  purposes;  

• Funding  for  upgrade  of  existing  buildings  are  available  

Adequacy  of  policy  package    • The  policy  mix  is  rather  balanced;  • Different  actors  are  addressed;  • Targets  are  not  specified    

 

Screening  of  the  NEEAP  

public  sector  strategy  

role  model  

public  procurement  

public  buildings  

adequacy  of  package  

Page 4: LU 2013 01 18 · !!!!!LUXEMBOURG! Country!Report! SURVEY REPORT Progress in energy efficiency policies in the EU Member States - the experts perspective Findings from the Energy Efficiency

 

4  

MEPS  

other  regula[ons  

financing  instruments  

EPCs  

informa[on  

demonstra[on  

adequacy  of  package  

economic  incen[ves  

advice  and  audits  

educa[on  and  training  

MEPS  

economic  incen[ves  

energy  labels  

informa[on  tools  

educa[on  and  training  

adequacy  of  package  

Comprehensiveness  of  policy  package  

Minimum  Energy  Performance  Standards  (MEPS)  

• Ecodesign  Directive  implemented  

Economic  incentives     • A  financial  incentive  for  the  purchase  of  A++  refrigerators  is  available  

Energy  labels   • EU  energy  label;  Promotion  of  efficiency  labelling  

Information  tools  

• A  website  offers  information  about  energy  efficient  appliances;  

• Further  tools  and  information  campaigns  are  mentioned  but  not  further  described  

Education  and  training  for  retail  staff  and  other  supply  chain  actors  

• Not  mentioned  

Adequacy  of  policy  package  

• The  policy  package  is  rather  balanced;  • Education  and  training  for  retail  staff  is  missing  

 

Residential  Sector  -­‐  Appliances  

Residential  Sector  -­‐  Buildings  Comprehensiveness  of  policy  package  

Minimum  Energy  Performance  Standards  (MEPS)  

• Minimum  energy  performance  standards  are  in  place  and  are  to  be  tightened  until  2016.  

Other  regulations   • Not  mentioned  

Economic  incentives  

• Subsidies  are  available  for  energy  efficient  retrofits;  • Subsidies  for  the  construction  of  passive  or  low-­‐energy  housing;  

• Tax  credits  and  investment  aids  are  available  

Financing  instruments  

• Interest-­‐free  loan  to  finance  energy  efficient  retrofits  for  low-­‐income  households;  

• Introduction  of  an  accelerated  tax  depreciation  for  energy  efficient  retrofits  

Energy  performance  certificates  (EPCs)  

• Energy  Performance  Certificates  are  mentioned  with  regard  to  public  buildings  for  which  the  display  is  mandatory  if  the  area  is  greater  than  1000m2  

Energy  advice  and  audits  • The  energy  agency  provides  some  advice;  • Grants  for  energy  audits  of  buildings  are  available  according  to  MURE  

Information  tools  • The  energy  agency  organized  an  event  around  the  topic  “energy-­‐efficient  retrofitting”  which  gathered  many  buildings  professionals  and  attracted  2500  visitors  

Demonstration  projects   • Plus  energy  buildings  are  built  by  the  public  sector  

Education  and  training  for  stakeholders  

• The  Chamber  of  Handicraft  covers  topics  related  to  energy  efficient  buildings  in  its  professional  development  programme;  

• The  professional  development  institute  of  the  buildings  sector,  the  association  of  architects  and  engineers,  the  Ministry  of  Economy  and  Trade  as  well  as  the  University  of  Luxembourg  offer  further  education  and  training  programmes  

Adequacy  of  policy  package  

• The  NEEAP  considers  the  saving  potentials  in  the  buildings  sector;  

• Different  actors  are  addressed;  • The  supply  and  demand  side  are  addressed  

 

Page 5: LU 2013 01 18 · !!!!!LUXEMBOURG! Country!Report! SURVEY REPORT Progress in energy efficiency policies in the EU Member States - the experts perspective Findings from the Energy Efficiency

 

5  

standards  

ES&A  targets  

economic  incen[ves  

tradable  permits  

energy  labelling  

adequacy  of  package  

obliga[ons  

energy  taxa[on  

planning  instruments  

regulatory  instruments  

economic  incen[ves  

informa[on  

R&D  support  

adequacy  of  package  

Comprehensiveness  of  policy  package  

Standards  for  equipment,  production  process,  products     • Implementation  of  the  Ecodesign  Directive  

Energy  savings  and  action  targets  for  individual  companies    

• A  voluntary  agreement  on  improving  energy  efficiency  in  industry  has  been  concluded  between  the  government  and  the  industry  association  

Obligations  /  commitments   • Luxembourg  plans  to  promote  motor  and  process  technologies    

Economic  incentives  

• Albeit  not  mentioned  in  the  NEEAP,  energy  savings  grants  are  available  for  EE  investments  of  industry  according  to  the  MURE  database;  An  accelerated  fiscal  amortisation  is  granted  for  investments  in  EE  according  to  the  MURE  database  

Tradable  permits   • Only  EU  ETS  

Energy  or  CO2  taxation   • The  minimum  rate  is  applied  

Energy  labelling  • Partly  included  in  all  MS  due  to  EU  energy  labelling  regulation  which  does  not  cover  all  appliances  though  

Other  sectors       • Several  measures  in  the  agricultural  sector.  

Adequacy  of  policy  package  • Potential  for  energy  savings  considered;  

• Supply  and  demand  side  are  considered  

 

Industry  and  Tertiary  Sector  

Comprehensiveness  of  policy  package  

Planning  instruments   • Not  mentioned  

Regulatory  instruments   • Speed  limitations  for  certain  vehicle  categories  and  promotion  of  biofuels  mentioned  (MURE)  

Economic  incentives  • Vehicle  tax  linked  to  CO2  emissions;  

• Grants  for  low  emitting  vehicles  

Information  and  advice   • Passenger  car  labelling  (MURE)  

R&D  support   • Not  mentioned  

Adequacy  of  policy  package  • The  policy  package  addresses  only  car  users;  

• Potentials  considered  

 

Transport  Sector  

Page 6: LU 2013 01 18 · !!!!!LUXEMBOURG! Country!Report! SURVEY REPORT Progress in energy efficiency policies in the EU Member States - the experts perspective Findings from the Energy Efficiency

 

6  

In   2011   and   2012,   Energy-­‐Efficiency-­‐Watch  conducted   a   quantitative   and   qualitative   survey  with   national   experts   on   implementation   of  energy  efficiency  policies  in  EU  Member  States.  

More   than  70%  of   the  experts  for  Luxembourg  (7  questionnaires   were   completed)   state   that  Luxembourg’s  energy  efficiency  policy  is  generally  ambitious   or   at   least   ambitious   in   a   range   of  sectors.   However,   the   progress   over   the   past  three   years   is   perceived   as  medium.   43%  of   the  respondents   see  no  progress   at   all   or   only   a   few  additional  policies  while  another  43%  see  a  range  of   additional   policies.   As   to   target   achievement,  most  of  the  respondents  are  skeptical;  86%  expect  that   the   national  ESD   target  will   not   be   achieved  or,   if   achieved,  will   not   lead   to   much   additional  savings.   The   greatest   gaps   in   energy   efficiency  policy   are,   according   to   58%   of   the   respondents,  to   be   found   in   the   sector   of   transport.   The  greatest   barrier   to   energy   efficiency   is   lack   of  legislation   and   its   implementation   according   to  around  50%  of  the  respondents.    

In   the   residential   sector   some   positive   developments  were   noted,   in   particular   new   building   legislation  based  on  the  EPBD,  the  European  Directive  on  the  energy  performance  of  buildings.  It  is  expected  that  new  legislation  will  drive  energy  efficiency   in  new  buildings   in  the  residential  and  service  sector.  However,  the  growth  of  the  building  stock  represents  a  challenge.    

With  regard  to  the  public  sector  experts  welcome  the  upcoming  requirements  to  renovate  public  buildings.    

The  transport   sector   is   reported  to   face  significant  gaps   in  energy  efficiency  (the  third  highest  gap  across  sectors  and  countries).  Amongst  others,  increasing  numbers  of  cars  and  low  fuel  prices  were  mentioned  as  issues  in  the  transport  sector.  

Asked  about  how  they  rate  specific  policy  instruments,  the  experts  referred  to  energy  audits  (86  %  partly  or  very  effective)  and  qualification,  accreditation  and  certification  schemes   (71  %  partly  or  very  effective)  as  very  effective.  Half  of   the   interviewees  consider  voluntary  agreements  as  not  effective  at  all   (the  second  highest  percentage  of  all  Member  States).  

Findings  from  the  Expert  Survey  

14%  

14%  

29%  

43%  

Lux:  overall  ambiWon  of  the  energy  efficiency  policies  

generally,  rather  low  

ambi[ous  in  a  few  sectors,  less  so  in  most  others  

ambi[ous  in  a  range  of  sectors,  less  so  in  a  few  others  

generally,  rather  high  

29%  

57%  

14%  

Lux:  achievement  of  naWonal  energy  savings  target  

target  will  not  be  achieved  

target  will  be  achieved  but  will  not  lead  to  a  lot  of  addi[onal  savings  

target  will  probably  be  achieved  

Page 7: LU 2013 01 18 · !!!!!LUXEMBOURG! Country!Report! SURVEY REPORT Progress in energy efficiency policies in the EU Member States - the experts perspective Findings from the Energy Efficiency

 

7  

Luxembourg  has  put  a   lot  of  effort   into   the  buildings   sector  policy  package  which  can  be  seen  as  a  good  practice  example.  Minimum  energy  performance  standards  are  in  place  and  are  to  be  tightened  until  2016.  A   good   financial   basis   for   retrofitting   buildings   exists   through   economic   incentives   and   financing  instruments   (i.e.   subsidies   for  energy  efficient   retrofits  and   for   the  construction  of  passive  or   low-­‐energy  housing,   interest-­‐free  loan  for   low-­‐income  households  etc.).  Education  &   training   is  provided  through  the  Chamber  of  Handicraft,  the  association  of  architects  and  engineers  and  others  that  cover  topics  related  to  energy  efficient  buildings  in  its  professional  development  programme.  

The  appliances  sector  is  marked  by  a  balanced  policy  framework  which  is  better  than  the  average  result  in  other  countries   in   this  sector.  Still   improvement  can  be  made   through  strengthening  of  minimum  energy  performance   standards,   and   energy   labeling.  As  well   it   is   possible   to   implement   regulations   and  policies  that  go  beyond  EU  regulations.  Here  NEEAPs  of  the  Netherlands,   Ireland  and  France  can  be  seen  as  good  practice  examples.  

The  weakest  sector   in  the  Luxembourgish  NEEAP  is   the  transport   sector.  First  of  all  planning  instruments  and  R&D  support  measures  are  not  mentioned  in  the  NEEAP  which  must  be  done.  Regulatory  instruments,  economic   incentives,  and  information  and  advice  measures  are  described  weakly  and  show  few  effort  for  this   sector.   Orientation   offer   the   NEEAPs   of   Finland   and   Slovenia   which   can   be   taken   as   good   practice  examples.   Finland   has   implemented   a   policy   package   which   utilizes   the   complete   set   of   instruments   to  achieve  energy  efficiency.  One  overarching  goal  of  the  policy  package  is  the  induction  of  a  modal  shift  by  making   public   transport,   cycling   and   walking   more   attractive.   Finland   also   makes   use   of   regulatory  measures.  Among   these   is   the   introduction  of  a  general   speed   limit  and  mandatory   tyre-­‐pressure  checks  twice   a   year.   In   Finland   vehicle   tax   rates   are   dependent   on   the   car’s   emissions.   The   expansion  of   public  transport  systems  is  financially  supported  e.g.  by  funding   the  construction  of  right-­‐of-­‐way   lanes  for  buses  and   subsidized   tickets.   Various  measures   aim   to   give   guidance   through   information.  Among   these   is   the  inclusion   of   energy-­‐efficient   driving   in   the   curricula   of   driver’s   education.  A   good  practice   example   from  Slovenia  is  to  link  the  subsidy  for  public  transport  providers  to  the  number  of  km  travelled  by  passengers  and  no  longer  to  the  number  of  km  travelled  on  the  road.  

 

Good  Practice  Examples  

Page 8: LU 2013 01 18 · !!!!!LUXEMBOURG! Country!Report! SURVEY REPORT Progress in energy efficiency policies in the EU Member States - the experts perspective Findings from the Energy Efficiency

 

 

   

Disclaimer  The  sole  responsibility   for  the  content  of  this  publication   lies  with  the  authors.   It  does  not  necessarily  reflect  the  opinion  of  the  European  Union.  Neither  the  EACI  nor  the  European  Commission  are   responsible  for  any  use  that  may  be  made  of  the  information  contained  therein.  The  analysis  performed  here  is  based  almost  exclusively  on  the  information  provided   in  the  NEEAPs.  Consequently,  a   low  score  for  any  of  the  criteria  analysed  could  also  be  the  result  of  a  NEEAP   lacking  detailed   information.  The  purpose  of  this  assessment   is  not  an  absolute  ranking  among  Member  States  but  is  focusing  on  each  Member  State’s  individual  conditions.    

Photography  Credits:  PhotoDisc,  iStock,  www.openclipart.org  

The  Project  In  2006,  the  European  Union  adopted  the  Directive  on  energy  end-­‐use  efficiency  and  energy  services  ("ESD").  The  Directive   sets   an   indicative   energy   saving   target   of   9   %   by   2016   as   well   as   obligations   on   national   authorities  regarding   energy   savings,   energy   efficient   procurement   and   the   promotion   of   energy   efficiency   and   energy  services.  It  requires  Member  States  to  submit  three  National  Energy  Efficiency  Action  Plans  (NEEAPs),  scheduled  for  2007,  2011  and  2014.  

The  Energy-­‐Efficiency-­‐Watch  Project  aims  to  facilitate  the  implementation  of  the  Energy  Service  Directive  and  the  Energy   Efficiency   Directive.   This   Intelligent   Energy   Europe   project   tried   to   portray   the   progress   made   in  implementation   of   energy   efficiency   policies   since   the   Energy   Service   Directive   via   NEEAPs   screening   and   an  extensive  EU  wide  expert  survey.  

www.energy-­‐efficiency-­‐watch.org  

The  Authors  Ralf  Schüle,  Thomas  Madry,  Vera  Aydin,  Jonas  Fischer,  Jan  Kaselofsky,  Thorsten  Koska,  Carolin  Schäfer-­‐  Sparenberg,  Lena  Tholen  (Wuppertal  Institute)    Daniel  Becker,  Nikolas  Bader  (Ecofys)  Christiane  Egger  (O.Ö.  Energiesparverband)  

with  contributions  by  Reinhold  Priewasser,  Michaela  Kloiber  (University  of  Linz)  Nils  Borg  (eceee),    Dominique  Bourges  (Fedarene),  Peter  Schilken  (Energy  Cities)  

List  of  Abbreviations  EE   –  Energy  Efficiency,  EED   –  Energy  Efficiency  Directive,  EPC   –   Energy  Performance  Certificates,  EPDB   –  Energy  Performance   of   Buildings   Directive,   ES&A   Targets   -­‐   Energy   Savings   and   Action   Targets,   ESCO   –   Energy   Service  Company,  ESD  –  Energy  Service  Directive,  EU  –  European  Union,  EEW  –  Energy-­‐Efficiency-­‐Watch,  MEPS  –  Minimum  Energy   Performance   Standards,  MRV   –   Monitoring,   Reporting   and   Verification,  MURE   –   Mesures   d’Utilisation  Rationelle  de  l’Energie,  NEEAP  –  National  Energy  Efficiency  Action  Plan,  R&D  –  Research  and  Development