Lovelock - Nevada Division of Forestryforestry.nv.gov/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Assessment... ·...

1
Jackpot Denio McDermitt Owyhee Wells Winnemucca Elko Lamoille Carlin Gerlach Battle Mountain Lovelock Fernley Sparks Reno Eureka Austin Fallon Virginia City Incline Village Ely Carson City Baker Yerington Minden Gardnerville Gabbs Hawthorne Tonopah Pioche Goldfield Rachel Caliente Alamo Beatty Mesquite Amargosa Valley Overton North Las Vegas Pahrump Las Vegas Henderson Laughlin Primm Mountain City Orovada Paradise Valley Golconda Spring Creek Mill City Empire Verdi Silver Springs McGill Ruth Middlegate Dayton Zephyr Cove Mason Schurz Round Mountain Panaca Moapa Boulder City Jean Searchlight West Wendover Indian Springs 0 25 50 12.5 Miles EXPLANATION Areas of Natural Resource Concern Low Moderate High The maximum value is 15 which means that 15 of the 17 layers overlaid each other. This map shows the composite of 17 layers identified from NDF's process and input from the State and Private Forest redesign components for the State Assessments. The color in the map versus the color in the legend are different because the data has a trasparancy value set to help show relief. The areas that are highlighted are state and private lands from the BLM land status data. Areas of the brown shaded relief are cause by the rasterization of certain data, whose extent didn't extend to the state boundaries. Forest Resources Assessment - GIS Analysis Layers used-each given equal weight: Private Lands-from SAP analysis Forest Health and Risk-from SAP analysis Annual grasses with 25% or greater coverage T & E Species NNHP and USFWS Vegetation Type- all forested values Community Wildfire Protection Plan Boundaries-Urban Areas Fire Regime Condition Class 2 and 3 Biomass locations with a buffer showing sources of fuels Riparian Areas 300 meters on main streams 100 m on tributaries Proposed BLM and USFS projects Greatest Change in Population between 2000 and 2030 NDF Stewardship Potential (High) Public Water Supplies-from SAP analysis Impaired Watershed Huc 8- using EPA 303d designation Wildland Urban Interface-selecting low-middle-high intermix Urbann/Green Infrastructure Forest Fragmentation-recommended in guidance docs

Transcript of Lovelock - Nevada Division of Forestryforestry.nv.gov/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Assessment... ·...

Page 1: Lovelock - Nevada Division of Forestryforestry.nv.gov/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Assessment... · 2010-09-21 · Denio McDermitt Jackpot Owyhee Wells Winnemucca Elko Lamoille Carlin

JackpotDenio McDermitt

Owyhee

Wells

Winnemucca

Elko

LamoilleCarlin

Gerlach BattleMountain

Lovelock

Fernley

SparksReno

EurekaAustinFallon

VirginiaCity

InclineVillage

Ely

CarsonCity

BakerYerington

MindenGardnerville

Gabbs

Hawthorne

Tonopah

Pioche

Goldfield

Rachel Caliente

Alamo

Beatty

Mesquite

AmargosaValley

Overton

North LasVegas

Pahrump LasVegas

Henderson

Laughlin

Primm

MountainCity

Orovada

ParadiseValley

Golconda

SpringCreek

MillCity

Empire

Verdi

SilverSprings McGill

RuthMiddlegateDayton

ZephyrCove

Mason Schurz

RoundMountain

Panaca

Moapa

BoulderCity

Jean

Searchlight

WestWendover

IndianSprings

0 25 5012.5 Miles

EXPLANATIONAreas of Natural Resource Concern

LowModerateHigh

The maximum value is 15 which means that15 of the 17 layers overlaid each other.This map shows the composite of 17 layers identifiedfrom NDF's process and input from the State and Private Forest redesign components for the State Assessments.The color in the map versus the color in the legend are different because the data has atrasparancy value set to help show relief. The areas that are highlighted arestate and private lands from the BLM land status data.Areas of the brown shaded relief are cause bythe rasterization of certain data, whose extent didn'textend to the state boundaries.

Forest Resources Assessment - GIS Analysis

Layers used-each given equal weight:Private Lands-from SAP analysisForest Health and Risk-from SAP analysisAnnual grasses with 25% or greater coverageT & E Species NNHP and USFWSVegetation Type- all forested valuesCommunity Wildfire Protection Plan Boundaries-Urban AreasFire Regime Condition Class 2 and 3Biomass locations with a buffer showing sources of fuelsRiparian Areas 300 meters on main streams 100 m on tributariesProposed BLM and USFS projectsGreatest Change in Population between 2000 and 2030NDF Stewardship Potential (High)Public Water Supplies-from SAP analysisImpaired Watershed Huc 8- using EPA 303d designation Wildland Urban Interface-selecting low-middle-high intermixUrbann/Green InfrastructureForest Fragmentation-recommended in guidance docs