Louis Charles Hamilton II Pro Se Appellant appearing before the Fifth Circuit Court Case No.:11-20216 herein file exhibit (A) exclusion of the “title” as Appellant factual brief for an appeal in the matter in its entire, full, intact, exact, and whole repeat production form provided Honorably before the Justices herein before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals as also being

“Entertain” in due diligences Justice before the Eastern District of Texas Federal Court “exclusion” of the Heading Title

Appellant (Hamilton II) herein furtherance’s, being respectful quite seriously requesting the “Honorable Court Justices” absolute respectful honest viewing, in addition to all of the official U.S. District Court transcripts records apply herein, attachments, exhibits,

All of which is “very rude and redundantly” in repeated failure to be render satisfactory without “white ruling class” stinky cover up “Justice System”

As depicted, stated and described in “Appellant Brief” below and in the following number U.S. Federal Case file: United States Southern District of Texas*District Court Case No.: 4:10-CV-2709.

Appellant (Hamilton II) being extreme respectful before the “Honorable Justice” request no further delays, cover up’s, hindrance, postponement, interruption,

procrastinate, put off, in light of all factual evidences supporting the Appellant (Hamilton II) since day one of these crude actual (RICO) “Mail and Wire” Fraud act(s) and Action(s) of all of the (Appellees) listed herein being “first and foremost” criminal intent committed against a “Holy Church” for Christ sake…involving the Appellant (Hamilton II)

Appellant (Hamilton II) move with strong “Demand” (Appellees) Harry C. Arthur Esq. et al” to turn over the deposition (ASAP) being fully complain of as additional standing 100% proof of the Appellees, Harry C. Arthur list of imprudence, transgression, indiscretions, misdeeds, causing complete blunder of Justice in such cover up’s and all (Appellees) stand before a Honest United States Jury Trial even if they are All Attorney(s) at Law,

They all took the responsible steps to flirt on the Illegal (RICO) criminal enterprise “wild side” and they shall all be brought before Justice one way or another.

The United States Bob Casey Federal Court House and The Harris County 215 District Court Houston Texas both being “quite shameful selective delusional”, and extreme being pass bogus in keeping prime evidence such as the deposition of (Harry C. Arthur) “Wrongdoing and impropriety” to be in production

This would clear all matters up quite extremely quickly

(Appellant) state respectful “However” before the “Honorable Justice” (Hamilton II) Appellant herein having obtain the same needed evidences, proof the U.S. District Court was quite bogus in refusal from (Appellees) Harry C. Arthur Esq. “Jim Crow Red Neck Cracker

Complete “Greedy Houston Texas Scrooge” trailer trash policy of dumping his commercial legal client’s entire legal court files, and his own Harry C. Arthur Esq.” personal business records” on the ground for “Trash”

Especially for my Louis Charles Hamilton II “Sherlock Holmes” and “Doctor Watson” non-fiction Case of the “Talking Treasure Box” to have our fine way with in (my, my, I say Watson) such prime picking of meaty substances of sorts all of which standing already honestly proof fully file in Justice in a USDA Federal Courthouse and being useless redundant.

Appellant Brief

that on or about the 24th day of February 2011 the Plaintiff filed the filing civil cause action H-10-2709 with all of its facts and also the Plaintiff Motion in Opposition not to dismiss same

cause H-10-2709 all of which will show the above Honorable Justices as following:

In The United States of America District Court

For The Southern District of Texas

Houston Division

Louis Charles Hamilton II AMEND COMPLAINT # 2

Plaintiff

Vs. Civil Action No: H-10-2709

Harry C. Arthur (Esq.)

Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al, and

Marine Building, L.L.C. et al

Defendant(s)

And

Christ Church Cathedral et al

Co-Defendants

Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, herein files this Second Amend Complaint,

Plaintiff will show the Entitled Above Honorable Court “Detail Facts” against all described Defendants, Harry C. Arthur (Esq.), Law Office of “Harry C. Arthur et al”, “Marine Building, L.L.C. et al”, and The Co-Defendants

“Christ Church Cathedral” et al all being within Houston Texas, (United States of America)

And for cause the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, will show the Honorable Court as Follows:

Fact(s)

To Wit: The Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Respectfully assert all truthful material facts herein before the above entitled-Honorable U.S. District Court and making declaration under penalty of Law in that on or about (Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days before Thanksgiving Day)- To Wit:

The Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) hereafter named (Law office of Harry C. Arthur)

And Co-Defendant(s) (Marine Building L.L.C.) instituted a malicious civil action tort against Christ Church Cathedral Naming the (Beacon) within the suit seeking several cause of actions namely aim to shut down (Christ);

Which capture “News Headlines” as breaking news story local and nationwide through transmitting via device such as newspapers, radio, T.V. and Internet” labeling Houston Texas as “Derelict town” “USA” and the Defendant “Harry C. Arthur Esq. a/k/a “Scrooge” going to put a handle on things and toss out the “Nasty” Plaintiff and all homeless people at the homeless center base upon them being a nuisances among other charges made by (Arthur).

To include but not limited to defendant(s) collectively sought to among other things impose a permanent injunction against (Christ) to shut down The Beacon, the homeless center, on the ground it's a "private nuisance”;

Claiming among other things in a “Hostile Tort containing defamatory, discriminatory and Invidious Discrimination fashion that the Plaintiff and other(s) similar situated just simply mill about, panhandle, bum cigarettes, urinate, defecate, sleep and make a general nuisance of themselves;

See: Harry C. Arthur et al and the Marine Building L.L.C. et al vs. (Christ) Filed in Harris County Texas District Court in Houston Texas.

In said suit against Christ Church Cathedral, filed on Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days before Thanksgiving – The Defendant herein Arthur and The Co-Defendant Marine Building et al seek a minimum of $250,000 in damages from Christ Church

Cathedral and The Beacon to compensate them for the loss of rentals in the three-story building and its market value.

Defendant Arthur's trial firm is in the building, which is located diagonally across an intersection from The Beacon.

The Beacon is operated by Cathedral Health & Outreach Ministries, a nonprofit established by the cathedral.

The Plaintiff asserts that (Arthur) in Christ church cathedral alleges that the "derelicts" (Christ church cathedral) assists has become a public nuisance, destroying the value of his business and property in the process.

To include but not limited to Defendant (Arthur) further defaming and applying invidious discrimination tact’s against the Plaintiff reputation by accusing the Plaintiff to be a danger to the health and safety of others in the adjacent areas,”

The defendant (Arthur) suit further states. “The (Plaintiff) and other individuals sing play music, dance, and fight and (do) other “undesirable activities”

The Defendant (Arthur) says. Further that "If all you do is feed them, you encourage them to stay on the street. And I'm afraid that may be kind of a little bit what's happening. They don't have any incentive to do anything."The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that each and every defendant listed and described above conspire in concert with their individual legal profession as (Attorney of Law) to organize fraudulent representation of Finances in “material

facts” in civil tort filing as described above in that the defendants collectively willfully wanton and aggressively committed the following:

1. Made a fraudulent bogus submission of material facts in Judicial Court records in Harris County Texas that each defendant separately business operation structure in connection with The Marine Building L.L.C. financial in-come was effected and in great, risk, loss and jeopardy as described in the complaint of (Arthur);

a. Made a further fraudulent bogus submission of ma-terial facts of insinuation, suggestion, implication, allusion and innuendos in Judicial Court records that each defendant as described herein personal financial income and all assets derive their of from said business structure as being describe as: Tangi-ble assets those that have a physical substance and can be touched, such as currencies, buildings, real estate, vehicles, inventories, equipment, and pre-cious metals

b. To include all live stock, farm animals, domestic ani-mals, cattle, sheep, pigs, horses, birds, and stock within the United States;

c. To include all live stock, farm animals, foreign ani-mals, cattle, sheep, pigs, horses, birds, and stock;

d. To include all Cash and cash equivalents — it is the most liquid asset, which includes currency, deposit accounts, and negotiable instruments (e.g., money orders, cheque, bank drafts). in the United States

e. To include all Short-term investments — include securities bought and held for sale in the near future to generate income on short-term price differences (trading securities).

f. To include all Receivables — usually reported as net of allowance for uncollectable accounts.

g. To include all Inventory — trading these assets is a normal business of a company. The inventory value reported on the balance sheet is usually the historical cost or fair market value, whichever is lower. This is known as the "lower of cost or market" rule.

h. To include all prepaid expenses — these are expenses paid in cash and recorded as assets before they are used or consumed (a common example is insurance). See also adjusting entries.

i. To include all Fixed asset in the United Statesj. Also referred to as PPE (property, plant, and equip-

ment), these are purchased for continued and long-term use in earning profit in a business. This group includes as an asset land, buildings, machinery, fur-niture, tools, and certain wasting resources e.g., timberland and minerals. They are written off against profits over their anticipated life by charg-

ing depreciation expenses (with exception of land assets). Accumulated depreciation is shown in the face of the balance sheet or in the notes.

k. To include all capital assets in management ac-counting.

l. To include all "Investments". Long-term invest-ments are to be held for many years and are not in-tended to be disposed of in the near future. This group usually consists of four types of investments: Investments in securities such as bonds, common stock, or long-term notes; Investments in fixed as-sets not used in operations (e.g., land held for sale); Investments in special funds (e.g., sinking funds or pension funds).

2. Was effected and in great risk, loss, and jeopardy as de-scribed in the complaint of (Arthur) because of the ac-tion of the Plaintiff and other similarly situated ;

3. Defendant (Arthur) then further in judicial court docu-ment filing in said malicious civil tort made the further fraudulent bogus submission of material facts of insinua-tion, suggestion, implication, allusion and innuendos in Judicial Court records that each defendant as described herein combine business financial income and (assets) & their personal income and (assets) after deductions of, housing or rent, phone bills, electricity, gas, water and

sewer, cable, waste removal, maintenance or repairs, transportation, insurance, food, dining out, pets, per-sonal care, medical, entertainment, taxes (Federal and State), saving or investments

As described above was not even enough for (Arthur) future financial business survival and security thereof in the Marine Building L.L.C. and base this all on the actions of the Plaintiff being a “Derelict” among other defamatory statements publish in a “Civil Tort”

Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court each defendant singularly and collectively was fully aware of his actions (most defendants being Attorneys of law no less) in holding together and collectively in such omission of actual material facts and allowing (Arthur) in the presentation of all combine fraudulent financial statement(s) being filed before a Texas Court of law by defendant (Arthur) in a hostile tort fashion of each defendant(s) independent business dealing collectively together.

Plaintiff Respectfully state before the Honorable Court that The Marine Building at the time frame (Arthur) made bogus, fraudulent, false wording before a Harris County Court of Law within the State of Texas in regards to “Lost Revenue and its association with extra rentals”, defendant(s) collectively “new at the very moment they were all combine in providing

false material facts when no such possible “Rental space revenue loss exist

Nor were there any extra spacing for rental at the time frame (Arthur) made complaint against (Christ) nor were there any losses at all in combine said rental property revenue within the “Marine Building L.L.C. et al

To include but not limited to such other factors that the plaintiff “investigation computation” render true facts that all Co-Defendant(s) Listed above under the “Marine Building L.L.C. et al do in fact having total possession, total custody and total control of all “possible rental spacing” as stated on the building directory

Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) and the (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) were very delusional, hallucinating, figment of the imagination, and under miss guided myth in the impression and mirage that the Co-Defendants (Marine Building L.L.C.) were with extra spacing for rentals

To Include all Defendants herein Straight out lie in all Court Records, Documents, Proceedings and News Media events during this “Matter”.

Pro Se Plaintiff herein Louis Charles Hamilton II will show a Honorable Court that “all of the Defendant” herein (except Co-Defendant Christ Church et al)

While during ongoing “Live” Federal Court Proceeding in 2011 at the “Bob Casey Federal Court in Houston Texas

“That” all Defendants herein at Law Office Harry C. Arthur et al, and “Marine Building L.L.C.”

“Completely toss in the Trash the following files records, interrogatories, request for disclosures ,Clients Certified Mail, Client complete briefs, Clients Background facts, Responses to request for disclosure phone

Messages, clients complete home Liability claim, “Internet research material”, phone numbers & Address, Detective reports, Divorce records, Attorneys listing, clients prices listing,

Attorney price listing, “United States Bankruptcy Court Records for the Southern District of Texas Houston Division records”, Insurance Records, Criminal records, Civil Records, Subpoena, Summon, Confidential Medical Records, Fax records, Notices, sign in sheets, listing of client(s) for stated:

Spradlin, Riley & Spradlin (Attorney at Law) 24017I-45 North Suite 1 (Woodlands, Texas 77380)

Spencer Crain Cubbage Healy & McNamara pllc 1330 Post Oak, Suite 1600 Houston Texas 77056

Ms. Kathryn P. Anderson, The Anderson Firm, L.L.C 5629 FM 1960 West, Suite 106 Houston Texas 77069

Global 14 Mamaroneck Ave.., 3rd floor White Plains, NY 10601

Lyndon B. Johnson Hospital (Houston Texas)

Clear Lake Reginal Medical Center ER, Dr. Susanna Perkins (League City), Dr. David Nelson, D.C. (League City), Dr. John Beerbower, M.D. (Dickinson), Dr. John G. Steele, M.D. (Dallas Texas), Leslie Miller, MOT, OTR (Houston Texas), Dr. Smith Johnston, M.D. (Dallas Texas), Dr. Edward Murphy, M.D. (Houston Texas), (Dr. Govindaraj Ranganathan, M.D. (Friendswood Texas), and Dr. David Durkop, D. C.

State farm Insurance Ms. Anise Wu (Austin Texas),

Richard Reading and Rhoda Marie Reading

Attorney Ned Gill 6575 West loop south, suite 600, Bellaire Texas 77401

(Rhoda Read living @ 1711 McLean Road, Pearland Texas 77584)….Married November 11, 2000

Esteban Hernandez

Calvin Banks

Johnny Villatoro

Nicholas Little (PSI)

Ja’mericka Hall

Jorge Santiago

Juan Sanchez

Richard Ramirez

Darvin Lynn

Samuel Robinson

Alvin Alfred

Esau Velasquez

Damon jaqot

Johnathan Simmons

Brian Golatt

Carl Newton

James Hughes

Pershing Powell

Luis Gonzaga

John Goffney

Erick Calderon

Alex Cantor-Marroquin

Deandre Mason

James Huntley

Eduardo Quiroga

Eduardo Garcilazo

Amicar Vasques

Dennis Carias

Arthur Mireles

Craig Scott

And Julio Matamoro

Eteban G. Alvear

Baltazar, Arroyo

Abraham Aparicio

Willentett T. August

Frances Arrendondo

Jocelyn Arnett

Timothoy Adair

Marilyn Aleman

Jennifer, Bronfield

Shen Burleson

Zachary T. Boston

Maurice S. Bradly

Xavier J. Cain

Augustin Carbajal

Homero Coronado

Martha Cuellar

Rosalyn Collins

John Contreras

Mike C. Cisneros

Guadalupe K. Cortez

Maria I Corona

Donovan Crosby

Garibaldi Campos

Jose A. Cantu

La Toya C. Carter

Paulo Castanuela Jr.

Carl A. Crochet

Anthony Doyel

Andros A. De La Cruz

Sharon L. Dolge

Amy Fleming

Brett M. Foisie

Alejandro Fernandez

Jesus Franco

Ricardo Gonzalez

Rubidia Garcia

Hector Guevara

Ismael Garza

Adolfo C. Gonzalez

Ruben M. Gonzalez

Salvador O. Gomez

Yessica Suarez-Galvan

Raymon M. Garcia

Lizette Guerra

David Gonzalez

Hameedul Hassan

Jennifer Hanner

Lucina M. hernandez

Devanand Hasmukh

Ronalald Jiles

Taft Jackson

Nathan A. Jimenez

John Joubert

Mauro Junco

James G. Jordan

Aaron D. Johnson

Jose D. Katz

Diamond Laddermore

Victor Lara

Julio C. Lopez

Duane E. Lawrence

Dwayne Liggines

Jonathan L. Limbrick

Luis Gerardo Lopez

Franciso Martinez

Jose D. jr. Moreno

Farris Mc Kendall

Francisco Munoz

Steven R. Nunez

Jerry L. Pierson

Andrew Phillips

Charles Piercefield Jr.

Amilcar Peraz

Santiago Pineda

Ruben Puga

Victor Portillo

Cesar A. Palacioa-Garza

Robert Robles

Joseph Rumfolo

Ari Riascos

Angel Sierra-Rojas

Sergio Rodriguez

Daniel Ramirez

Darrel W. Reece

Daniel Ramirez

Loreli Angel Del-Rivera

Jesus G. Reyes

Max Reza

Benito F. Rodriguez

Eugenio Romero

Ronald E. Rowan Jr.

Victor Soria-Gutierrez (Corpus Christi)

Armand J. Spence

Daniel E. Segura

Mustafa Sutarwala

Pete Saenz

Hector E. Gonzalez-Silvia

Kelton Simmons

Jose J. Segredo

Michael Scott

Oliveroes J. Torres

Luan Cong Trong

Maria E. Umanzor

Dillion W. Vernon

Markeith Whiting

Arthur Woods

Victor M. Zamora

To include the Plaintiff will show “Honorable Court” evidence with the Plaintiff actual physical name” Louis Charles Hamilton II” on it…

All being criminal, and gross negligent in dumping on the ground behind the Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al, and The Marine Building L.L.C on 2009 and completed before February 14 2011

All the “Physical Evidence Supporting Plaintiff complete Claims herein this “Federal Civil Action”

With Plaintiff herein (Time release photograph exhibits) already filed in the “Federal Court records & Plaintiff herein “Myspace.com account” showing for years 2009 and 2010 showing the complete criminal (RICO) activates (among other things) of the “Legal trash” toss on the ground.

Which the Plaintiff will show a “Honorable Court” that the Undersign Judge herein acted” Criminal in Conspire actions” with all Defendants in this action involving (Arthur et al) in the bogus bold refusal to produce any said documents, depositions or evidence in this “Matter and the conspire to scuttle of all evidence which is now in the hands of the Plaintiff

Except the “last final missing piece” Plaintiff seeks in this Federal Civil matter the “Deposition” conducted on Houston Texas Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur Esq.

By “Andy Vickery” Attorney at Law in Houston Texas during the matter with “Christ Church Cathedral;

As described herein Plaintiff exhibit(s) (A) will show an Honorable United States Federal Court showing the Following:

Exhibit - (A) Invoice dated 1/31/2011from the Marine Building L.L.C 1305 Prairie, Ste. 200 Houston, TX 77002 Bill to: Glenn Loethen 3rd floor

(February Rent $400.00 & February parking $100.00)

Plaintiff will first show the Honorable Court facts detailing surround Plaintiff exhibit (A) is this that during the exact day (Harry C. Arthur Esq. & Marine Building L.L.C et al ) filed suit against (Christ Church Cathedral)

Defendant himself (Arthur) had “just” deposited for the Month of November 2009 rent from (19) tenants all list above @ $400.00 each,

Plus $100 each from each tenants for Parking for a Grand Total of = ($9,500).

Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court from November 23 2009 to December 1st 2009 some (8) days later after Defendant himself (Harry C. Arthur Esq. & Marine Building L.L.C et al ) filed suit against (Christ Church Cathedral) “just” deposited another

($9,500) Dollars into the Marine Building L.L.C et al Banking account

Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that during the year of 2009 up to the day Defendant himself (Arthur Esq.) was in possession of the Marine Building L.L.C. (Arthur Esq.) deposited other ($108,000) Dollars into the Marine Building L.L.C et al banking account.

Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that during the course of this litigation for the year of 2010 Defendant himself (Arthur Esq.) deposited another($108,000) Dollars into the Marine Building L.L.C et al banking account.

Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant himself (Arthur) for the Last (5) years of (Ownership) of the “Marine Building L.L.C. having deposited in excess of ($902,500)

Plaintiff assert before the Honorable Court which is actually more income deposited base on Lacey’s Deli Commercial sq. ft. at no less than $600-$800 a month rentals (And based on Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur Greed).

With tenants Humberto R. Trejo (Criminal Attorney) suite 200, Sonia Behrana (Attorney) suite 200 and Pat Vargas Grady (Attorney) suite 200 having not been computation into these ($902,500) yearly factors and base upon (Arthur Greed)…

Making the income of Co-Defendant “Marine Building L.L.C.” deposited far in excess of ($932,500) yearly

With a (five) years grand total of $4,512,500. Being deposited into Co-Defendants “Marine Building L.L.C.” Banking accounts

Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Co-Defendants herein The “Ring Investigations et al” took in income in (one) month, funds in excess of $9013.53 gross.

With deduction for rent and parking of $500.00 leaving Ring Investigation net pay for one month in excess of $8513.53

Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Co-Defendants “Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al” took income in (one) month time funds in excess of:

During the month of November 2009 when (Arthur et al) file suit against (Christ et al) $166,500.00 per month = $330,001.00 for (2) months in the Month of November 2009 and the month of December 2009

When (Arthur et al) launch Hostile Takeover actions against (Christ Church Cathedral

Plaintiff will show a “Honorable United States Federal Court” that in the last (5) past years Defendant himself Law Firm & (Arthur Esq.) accumulated per year a Total of

$1,998,000.00 (One Million Nine Hundred and Ninety Eight Thousand Dollars

With a Grand total “Nets egg” deposited for a (5) year Law Firm Operation of $9,990,000

Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant himself (Arthur) for the Last (5) years of (Ownership) of the “Marine Building L.L.C. having deposited in excess of ($902,500)

And for

The last (5) past years Defendant himself Law Firm of Harry C. Arthur & (Arthur Esq.) accumulated per year a net Total of $1,998,000.00 (One Million Nine Hundred and Ninety Eight Thousand Dollars.

With a Grand total “Nets egg” deposited for a (5) year Law Firm Operation of $9,990,000 combine the two Grand Total for (5) years of the Marine Building L.L.C. and Law Offices of harry C. Arthur et al….. “Drum roll”……..Plaintiff will show an “Honorable Court Grand Total of $11,988,000.00 (Eleven Million Nine Hundred and Eighty Dollars

This figure was base upon (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) Clients listing filed above and for the following Clients:

Eteban G. Alvear

Baltazar, Arroyo

Abraham Aparicio

Willentett T. August

Frances Arrendondo

Jocelyn Arnett

Timothoy Adair

Marilyn Aleman

Jennifer, Bronfield

Shen Burleson

Zachary T. Boston

Maurice S. Bradly

Xavier J. Cain

Augustin Carbajal

Homero Coronado

Martha Cuellar

Rosalyn Collins

John Contreras

Mike C. Cisneros

Guadalupe K. Cortez

Maria I Corona

Donovan Crosby

Garibaldi Campos

Jose A. Cantu

La Toya C. Carter

Paulo Castanuela Jr.

Carl A. Crochet

Anthony Doyel

Andros A. De La Cruz

Sharon L. Dolge

Amy Fleming

Brett M. Foisie

Alejandro Fernandez

Jesus Franco (ha, ha)

Ricardo Gonzalez

Rubidia Garcia

Hector Guevara

Ismael Garza

Adolfo C. Gonzalez

Ruben M. Gonzalez

Salvador O. Gomez

Yessica Suarez-Galvan

Raymon M. Garcia

Lizette Guerra

David Gonzalez

Hameedul Hassan

Jennifer Hanner

Lucina M. hernandez

Devanand Hasmukh

Ronalald Jiles

Taft Jackson

Nathan A. Jimenez

John Joubert

Mauro Junco

James G. Jordan

Aaron D. Johnson

Jose D. Katz

Diamond Laddermore

Victor Lara

Julio C. Lopez

Duane E. Lawrence

Dwayne Liggines

Jonathan L. Limbrick

Luis Gerardo Lopez

Franciso Martinez

Jose D. jr. Moreno

Farris Mc Kendall

Francisco Munoz

Steven R. Nunez

Jerry L. Pierson

Andrew Phillips

Charles Piercefield Jr.

Amilcar Peraz

Santiago Pineda

Ruben Puga

Victor Portillo

Cesar A. Palacioa-Garza

Robert Robles

Joseph Rumfolo

Ari Riascos

Angel Sierra-Rojas

Sergio Rodriguez

Daniel Ramirez

Darrel W. Reece

Daniel Ramirez

Loreli Angel Del-Rivera

Jesus G. Reyes

Max Reza

Benito F. Rodriguez

Eugenio Romero

Ronald E. Rowan Jr.

Victor Soria-Gutierrez (Corpus Christi)

Armand J. Spence

Daniel E. Segura

Mustafa Sutarwala

Pete Saenz

Hector E. Gonzalez-Silvia

Kelton Simmons

Jose J. Segredo

Michael Scott

Oliveroes J. Torres

Luan Cong Trong

Maria E. Umanzor

Dillion W. Vernon

Markeith Whiting

Arthur Woods

Victor M. Zamora

@ Attorneys fees of $1500.00 per client…..

(However the “Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al” Gross 5 year period projection is in excess of $18,000,000.00 (Eighteen Million Dollars) which is even maybe slight higher than this simply base upon Houston Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur Esq. (Greed).

Plaintiff further Assert this $18,000,000.00 combine with all of the other Defendants @ Marine Building L.L.C. listed as:

Larry G. Justin (Case Manger) suite 200

Ralph M. Wear (Case Manger) suite 200

Humberto R. Trejo (Criminal Attorney) suite 200

Sonia Behrana (Attorney) suite 200

Pat Vargas Grady (Attorney) suite 200

(Tenants)

1. AA Quick Bond suite 100

2. Mike Cox’s Bail SVC suite 101

3. Lacey’s Deli

4. Jonathan A. Gluckman (Attorney) suite 102

5. Wayne Heller (Criminal Attorney) suite 103

6. Law offices of Harry C. Arthur suit 200

7. The Ring Investigations Mark Thering suite 300

8. The Ring Investigations Kandy Villarreal suite 300

9. Mark Thering (Attorney) suite 300

10. Darrel Jordon ( Criminal Attorney)

11. Daniel Perez-Garcia (Criminal/Immigration Attorney) suite 300

12. Marquerite Hudig (Criminal Attorney) suite 300

13. Carl D. Haggard (Attorney Mediator) suite 300

14. F.M. (Poppy) Northcut (Criminal Attorney) suite 300

15. Sandra Martinez (Criminal Attorney) suite 300

16. Allen J. Guidry (Criminal Attorney) suit 300

For a Combine well funded (RICO) Syndicate in easy excess of $ 32,000,000.00 (Thirty Two Million Dollars) “Hostile” “War Chest”….(Attempt)

To take on “Christ Church Cathedral et al” in a Hostile takeover” (Which Arthur et al Did in all facts and circumstances Attempt)

Plaintiff further assert his personal expert extreme knowledge that they (Arthur et al) was going to certainly need $ 32,000,000.00 (Thirty Two Million Dollars) “Hostile” “War Chest Money”….

With “Two Extra Big Titanium Steel Balls” Taking on (Christ et al)……

Base upon:

(1). “Christ Church Cathedral et al, Houston” is the “Cathedral Church for the Episcopal Diocese of the “Whole State of Flipping Texas……Da’

(2.) And the “Houston Cathedral” and The entire congregation was established in 1839

(That Arthur et al and your “Hostile 32 Million Dollars Take Over”) Vs. Very, Very Old Money in Houston Cathedral with interest incurred since… 1839

Added in with The Entire United States of America Federal Government funding for the “Homeless” in the “Top of Millions” of Tax Dollars per year C/o “Christ Church Cathedral et al, Houston”.

If ya So (Slooooooooow), “Big rock take little Rock”

The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court all defendant(s) singularly and or collectively were committed to making extreme calculations and execution(s) of false prejudice or stereotyping statements of the reputation of the Plaintiff as described in the “Tort” filed against (Christ) of being substandard which defendant carry out this scheme for profit through the Wide spread media News agencies both local and National” at the expense of Plaintiff to be of a“

Nasty horrid revolting reputation” in connection with defendant(s) collective “Financial scheme/crime of things for profit”

And conspiracy in connection thereof, for unauthorized access of a protected media computer, public records and court records & court: txed

And all protected records thereof, in which all defendant(s) herein collectively did access said mail and wire computer device(s) to provide and promote tremendous amounts of “Negative” fraudulent personal and business information which were “indeed” attempt to be used in a fraudulent advantage way to fraud for wrongful future gains of monies and to scam in the devalue of real estate property of the Co-Defendant(s) (Marine Building L.L.C.) and surrounding area’s

To include but not limited to all defendants commitment to a further conjure to work collective for defendant (Arthur) scheme of things in among other things in obstruction of justice in connection to collection(s) thereof of all ill-gotten gains

And placing a long “term of loss value on (Christ) property in the Houston Down town area

Misrepresentation of all material facts in regards to all defendants financial business survival, endurance, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death during a Legal Judicial proceeding, and in public records

Fraudulent omission in the presentation of all material facts in official court records in regards to the Defendants business financial dire situation to fraud the “Interest of (“Christ”) against the rights of the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff will show the “Honorable Court Defendant(s) collective scheme of things could not for any reasoning exclude the Plaintiff from this group (Beacon Clients) because it would be counterproductive to the “Master Plan” if casting the Plaintiff as the only decent, clean, dirt free, cleanse, spotless, sophisticated, skilled, learn, knowledgeable, educated, and privileged person among the group and opposite from the group and the defendant(s) collective scheme has no chance ever of survival.

The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court the Defendant(s) collective scheme of things in the usage of “Invidious Discrimination tactic & Defamatory tactic” against dignity because the Plaintiff is a part of group associated with (Beacon Clients) also was express by the sarcasm, mockery, cynicism, travesty of exaggeration(s) of the Plaintiff to be without cause to exist and Plaintiff only existence on earth in the Houston Texas area is for free food @ the (Beacon) only”

To include but not limited to facts surrounding the defendant(s) collectively wrongful use of liable/slander against (HPD) Houston Police Department to their advantage by ways of making false claims of no security being properly provided in the area of the (Beacon) or lack thereof as stated in the complaint of the defendant(s) which is so untrue and supported by Police reports in the city of Houston Texas during the time frame (Arthur) made complaints against (Christ).

In which the Defendant(s) collectively further sought safely to carry out their Organization well premeditated plans to degrade the downtown area “Property Value” around (“Christ”) with its claims of the Plaintiff being “Total Human Trash “

While defendant(s) herein collectively plan a systematic using/planning hostile by further future means to obtain the

Property of (Christ) with the unwitting “Media” usage for wide spread media coverage in connection with a financial scheme & fraudulent crime of things

With the “Media” also as the main driving device to carry out for the defendant(s) “devily clever” collective “sham and scheme” of things to create a property lost for the benefit of the Marine building L.L.C. with the Plaintiff being unwittingly at the “Hands of all defendant(s) herein being the source of all “depreciation and degrading factors” against (Christ) property and the local area property for a profit scam.

The defendants (Arthur et al) herein collective scheme of things to attempt also to devalue the property of (“Christ”) and the real estate for the benefit of Co-Defendant in this action Marine Building L.L.C in the downtown Houston, Texas area To include but not limited to the Free promotional Advertisement for Co-Defendant (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) being the Reputed Ruthless Law Firm

And all of the ill-gotten revenue derive their from the “New Reputed Ruthless Law Firm Reputation” with Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) further scheme and sham of things being wrongfully promotion with the free planned usage of the unsuspecting, unwitting, unconscious, efforts of all media agencies both “local and

national” with the “Internet” included at the expensive of the Plaintiff and other instantaneously similar the same.

All was indeed done unjust, and most certainly unwanted against the Plaintiff “rights and dignity”, to include this scheme of things was further to fraudulent cheat (Christ) out of monetary federal/private/donation funds in excess of ($250,000) base all wrongfully upon the Plaintiff being “Street Nasty Trash”

In the area around The Marine Building L.L.C. for a future profit scheme of the Defendant(s) collective shame to include alternatively Plaintiff is able to show the defendant(s) having further premeditated plans after the impose permanent injunction against the (Beacon) defendant(s) sought to further obtain (Christ) property for them self or together with some other real estate conglomerate for further scam for profit(s).

Plaintiff further assert In the process of (Arthur et al ) doing “ all of the above nasty” defendant (Arthur et al) then went further and “stole” the Plaintiff “Christmas Holiday season of 2009”

While attempting on giving the “Christ et al” “a black eye” before Thanksgiving day of 2009 in the “National media” in the process with all of the criminal (RICO) display that Defendant (Arthur et al ) having now balls after making all of this unwanted, wrongful

And unjust fuss having the nerves of filing a dismissal of his civil suit as if nothing “ever”, “ever”, “even” “Happen” further causing the Plaintiff emotional distress and mental anguish in being involved with (Arthur et al ) in any form” both past, present and future.

Plaintiff Assert that Defendant, (Arthur Esq.), Co-Defendant(s) (Law office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and Co-Defendant (Marine Building L.L.C. et al)

Individually and collectively as described herein above committed all acts and actions as described fully herein in Violations committed under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization practices against the legal rights of the Plaintiff in connection with Fraud as described here in the (2) Amend Complaint.

The Plaintiff will show the United States District Court Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) complaint made against (Christ et al) was in the nature of seeking monetary relief for the so call property damages, loss rentals, and property value loss in lieu of Plaintiff alleged acts,

Yet the Defendants collectively continue to disregard their own “actual property value” by the Defendants on mismanagements mistake in Commercial Property up keeps by way of the following exhibit(s) already on the United States Federal District Court files:

a. The continual human waste already complain of still be-ing published and posted for over a 2 year period of time*See Plaintiff exhibit (P-1), photo in 2009

b. The continual mismanagements in the past drunken failed exterior painting project of the commercial prop-erty and any future up keep in this area being provided for over a period of 2 years. *See Plaintiff exhibit (P-2) photo in 2009

c. The continual mismanagements in the safety in the fire escape extreme and needed up keep *See Plaintiff ex-hibit (P-3), photo in 2009

d. The continual mismanagements in nasty restaurant trash simply left about on the ground for lots of rodents’ for over a period of 2 years *See Plaintiff exhibit (P-4) photo in 2009

e. The continual mismanagements in the finances needed to provide for all of the extreme and well over due needs as described in paragraph a, b, c, and d above The continual human waste already complain of still being published and posted for over a 2 year period of time*See Plaintiff exhibit (P-1), photo in 2009

f. The continual mismanagements in the past drunken failed exterior painting project of the commercial prop-

erty and any future up keep in this area being provided for over a period of 2 years. *See Plaintiff exhibit the new 2010 series of pictures….

g. The pictures showing continual mismanagements in the safety in the fire escape extreme and needed up keep *See Plaintiff exhibit 2010 up dated

h. The continual mismanagements in restaurant trash sim-ply left about on the ground for rodents’ for over a pe-riod of 2 years *See Plaintiff exhibit 2010 up date

i. The continual mismanagements in the finances needed to provide for all of the extreme and well over due needs as described in paragraph a, b, c, and d above with 2010 photograph up detail up date.

j. With the Illegal Immigrants attempt at futile repairs

Plaintiff was in fact both a direct and indirect party of all wrongful involvements as described by the Defendant(s) own wording in the complaint against (Christ et al)

And serious damages did in fact occurred by all of the collectively hostile, extreme and outrageous acts and actions of the Defendants as described in the Plaintiff original Complaint, Amend Complaint, all motions and exhibits currently before the Honorable Court.

With all Plaintiff mental medical records on file at the Harris County in support of the Defendant causing Plaintiff intentional emotional harm, complete severe mental anguish

Defendant(s) collectively sought Ultra Vires Acts in their cruel presentations made against (Christ et al) with claims of a profound impact that the “Nasty Plaintiff” impose on the Public interest, health, and safety as described in (Arthur et al) complaint against (Christ et al)

In addition the Defendants herein collectively sought to impose a “less value of worth” towards the public impression of the Plaintiff base upon the complaint, while inciting racial hate, ridicule of a scheme for monetary fund’s against (Christ et al) thinking (Christ et al) is weak unprotected & meanwhile the scum Derelicts & panhandlers pose no threat and

Are too stupid to understand the Defendants herein collectively Criminal RICO “Mail and Wire” Fraud Scheme of things for greed, and the Plaintiff too legal weak and unprotected cause he is street trash.

Plaintiff will show the United States Federal Court Defendants to this action one (Arthur et al) “boldly and foolishly” is now desecrating such the “Honorable Work Product” of the two Professional legal Attorneys”.

By way of Defendant (Arthur et al) claiming/theft the entire work product of another Attorney(s) work product.

Namely (Andy Vickery& Kenny IV Esq.) the “Professional legal Attorneys” listed above who’s legal wording design in the deposition with the Plaintiff (Hamilton) own work product of legal documents being also provided to (Andy Vickery Attorney at Law & Kenny IV Esq.) before hand of said Deposition of (Arthur Esq.)

The work product of namely (Andy Vickery& Kenny IV Esq.) the “Professional legal Attorneys” against (Arthur et al) in the past in all fact and circumstances defeated (Arthur Esq. and Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al and The Marine Building L.L.C. et al” and not some (Bogus) materials that may having been prepared by (Arthur et al) “himself” with an eye towards the realistic possibilities in defense of this particular impending litigation against The Plaintiff (Hamilton II)

And or materials that (Arthur Esq.) prepared in defense of himself in his on direct examination...? In the previous civil action against the “Holy Church”.

Defendant (Arthur et al) seems to think now collectively combining his other wrongful acts and actions precisely committed and directed against the Plaintiff rights and dignity in the past that any future defamatory acts and further fraudulent practices by said defendant (Arthur et al) in the now

stated claims of the work product of another Attorney(s) deposition…

Is the same/equivalent as if claiming the Plaintiff to be a total “water/egg head bumpkin ” from Jefferson County, Texas whom happen to fallen of a Long Horn Cattle truck in a pasture field upon a petrified pieces of cow crap …thus providing the Plaintiff already being further in a state …from all leaves of his own common sense and

fully rendering this Plaintiff (Hamilton II) as a previously mentioned total “water/egg head bumpkin” ignorant of all of the Civil Court laws of the United States “that even a 5th grader can figure out” in regards to the “work product” and or “Attorney/client doctrine” defendants (Arthur et al) now seeks foolish refuge under.

Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant (Arthur et al) even refuse to file the suit against the correct Defendants’ and avoid the Plaintiff from suffering being humiliated in public with excitement of ridicule from others which (Arthur) cause to include causing the Plaintiff further inner humiliation

In which he (Arthur) should have filed his suit against the “City of Houston et al” for not providing needed restrooms for the homeless population like other metropolitan cities

“In fact do” with a large homeless population equal to the City of Houston TX similar homeless population and or smaller cities population “yet” homeless people are having adequate restroom access other then here within “Houston” Texas which defendant (Arthur) did not pursue this avenue;

Instead (Arthur) attack the Beacon clients “Only” as if all of the clients are guilty of the human crap and urine on his building and especially slow in the brain department in being afraid to pursue rightful legal actions against a (Attorney) no less for his wrong actions;

Plaintiff will show the United States Federal Court Defendant (Arthur et al) further refuse to “add all other” outreach centers located throughout the Houston (CBD) central business district as joining Plaintiff in his action against the Christ Church Cathedral, and the Beacon… Defendant (Arthur et al) went after “Christ Church Cathedral”

And the Beacon (Only) with his suit while his scheme of things include defaming the Plaintiff in the process while (Arthur) attempt to achieve monetary fund’s based on defaming and discriminating against the Plaintiff rights and dignity;

Instead of (Arthur et al) implying some of the client(s) of the beacon being Derelict(s) with implication in the definition of derelict that charges the Plaintiff with the further commission

of a crime of crapping, pissing and vomiting on the property of the Defendant;

(Arthur et al) “Unflinchingly, courageously, and with an Audaciously bold potty mouth” with strong references to “defecation, crap, feces matter and Urine discharge “as loath some” as one can get with this kind of human product waste being criminally involved

And or as in the “Hood” or any other place with among my (African American) people would refer to as “S.H.I.T.” and “Piss” and or one “nasty” “Trifling mother fu_ker” to be doing this kind of acts in a public place.

(Arthur et al) have the Plaintiff being involved in these allegations of human nasty waste being wrongfully discharge and its involvement with the Plaintiff (among other statements) that refer to the Plaintiff further being associated with being a nuisances in Houston, Texas being made public not just local but “Nationwide” to include but not limited to the “World” via the “Internet”

(Arthur et al) then wanted to shut down the Plaintiff “feedhole” namely “The Beacon” “Only” with strong emphases on “forever”

And terminated any further charity outreach at this beacon facility “Only” in the (CBD) while (Arthur et al) further

attempt to steal $250,000.00 dollars of the Plaintiff “ Poor man money”

The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that all of the Defendant(s) collectively herein while having several “legal degrees” @ Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al to “boot” and “Marine Building L.L.C.,

Quite failing “on purpose” once again to print the “Whole Truth” in a simple honest legal Attorney form in a Motion to dismiss this action (Stating the Plaintiff has no legal standing in Texas)”.

“With the full knowledge “Taxpayers in the State of Texas” “have standing to enjoin the illegal expenditure of public funds”, and “need not demonstrate a particularized injury”.  Which the defendant(s) wishes to mislead the Honorable Court in the Plaintiff current legal standing before the court:

See id.; Calvert v. Hull, 475 S.W.2d 907, 908 (Tex.1972);  Osborne v. Keith, 142 Tex. 262, 177 S.W.2d 198, 200 (1944).  

Implicit in this rule are two requirements:  (1) that the plaintiff is a taxpayer; and (2) that public funds are expended on the allegedly illegal activity.   See Bland, 34 S.W.3d at 556;  Calvert, 475 S.W.2d at 908;  Osborne, 177 S.W.2d at 200.

Yet the Defendant(s) collectively wishes to continue committing to further “pattern and practices” of “Illegal

Misrepresentation of all “material facts in the capacity of Attorneys of Law.

(An Attorney whom representing himself has a fool for a client surly applies here)

The Plaintiff further respectfully asserts that in the Defendants motion to dismiss on the records of this action quoted:

Williams v. Lara, 52 S.W.3d 171, 178-79 (Tex) “Which do not even in all fact and circumstances apply in this matter:

“Taxpayers in Texas legally have standing to enjoin the illegal expenditure of public funds, and “need not” demonstrate a particularized injury” as stated by the Law Books.

“Moreover” the Plaintiff is a Veteran of the “Armed Force Services” namely the “United States Navy Which such “Legal Services” the (Beacon) provided is a “gift of appreciation” for any “Veteran” returning to a “normal start” in life within Houston Texas”

With the full support by all of the taxpayer “Nation Wide” in association with the United States Federal Government providing a funding to a legal operation to provide not just for the Plaintiff behalf in dire situations needs of being poor,

To include but not limited to the said “Armed Force Services” namely the Navy for argument sake “if being a possible “direct cause” of the Plaintiff being at a state of “Disable American Veteran”

To which said (Beacon) services is still such a services of a gift of appreciation on the Plaintiff behalf and a direct legal needed aid in returning to a normal new start in life with a “Disability” moreover,

Still leaving the (Beacon) and its “legal services” a gift of appreciation for a (DAV) Disable American Veteran being provided that is supported by all of the taxpayers “Nation Wide”,

In association with the United States Federal Government providing a funding to a legal operation to provide not just for the Plaintiff behalf in dire situations needs of being poor,

To include but not limited to The Defendant(s) in (Arthur et al) collectively wishes to maintain in the delusions of the Plaintiff was not a party to the “cause of actions” being brought in said suit against (Christ et al) or any damaged being caused by any actions of the defendants as a result of their law suit.

And Plaintiff has no justifiable interest in his allegations made against collectively against all of the Defendants in his complaint.

Plaintiff first respectfully asserts before the Honorable Court and address the non-fictional facts that the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) collectively did not file suit against “Christ Church Cathedral” for:

(1).a sexual misconduct nature of any Defendant(s) herein “genitals” being in violations of some sorts or sodomizing acts being past or present occurred and committed against any of the Defendants rights, will & Dignity; by (Christ et al)

(2). nor did the Defendant(s) collectively seek concrete civil refugee in a suit against (Christ) with concrete claims in a nature that a “Brick” happening to “heavenly dislodge itself” from the “Cathedral high castle structure” and simply pick –n-fall upon any of their collectively heads;

Plaintiff strongly assert before the Honorable Court that These Greedy Nasty Defendant(s) collectively herein (Arthur et al) made real criminal intent in a “Mail and Wire” fraud scheme of things among other (RICO) and State Civil Charges against the Plaintiff rights, peace, dignity all for profit and bogus claims filed further on the “Harris County Court Wire system in Houston Texas” which is then “broadcast” “Nationwide” no less”

That the Plaintiff being a client of the beacon Is now factual a “nasty dog of a person who cannot hold his “crap from his rectum or urine” therefore likes pissing all over the

Defendant (Arthur Esq.) property @ Marine Building L.L.C. and all over the city of Houston Texas,

To include Plaintiff (Hamilton II) is a real panhandler derelict of sorts with “not a simple single purpose in life of any sorts”

“But bum smokes and like dancing in the streets”

Among other crude statements being made in said complaint against (Christ et al)

And the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) herein collectively is entitled to a special grand “Hefty” $250,000.00 Dollars. From the Co-Defendants (Christ et al)

To include but not limited to the Federal Government legal support of the (Beacon) for the Plaintiff behalf is “Hereby fully and forever close to boot” in this “Obstruction of Justice” of a legal Federal Funded Operation

With all of the Defendants “Claims” (“among other things”);

Lost some rentals funds and Defendants (Arthur Esq.) “Main property value” (Marine Building L.L.C. Is now in the “Super Trash Can” and the reasoning is based upon the Pro Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) is super nasty and very lose on the City of Houston Texas.

Therefore the City of Houston is now official “Derelict Town USA” base upon the Plaintiff as described by (Arthur et al).

And Plaintiff wishes to remind the United States Federal Court all of this is based upon the actions of the Defendants et al in a hostile civil suit against (Christ et al) for the relief of direct monetary compensation in value of said whopper of a sum in excess of $250,000.00 with full time forever closure of the (Beacon et al)

But the Plaintiff is not a party…? Nor was the Plaintiff damage in any form….?

Plaintiff (2) Amend Complaint states a long list of “Legal Federal cause of actions with new update exhibits attached herein of Legal Exhibits from the Defendant(s) in the possession of the Plaintiff as described herein

Fully Furthering “The United States of America Federal Court” requiring the Defendant(s) collectively herein (Arthur et al and (Christ et al) to be held fully “responsible and most accountable” before a “United States Federal Court” for all of these criminal and civil acts

And actions described against the Plaintiff peaceful rights, will, and dignity as described herein,

Plaintiff further assert Defendant (Arthur et al) and Co-Defendants (“Christ et al”) collectively having cause enough “emotional trauma” and National disrespect to the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II

As described herein and rightfully so, causing undue disrespectful behavior of the same criminal RICO “Mail and Wire” nature to others similarly the same,

With “Extreme gross negligent” by Co-Defendant herein “Christ et al” in Defense of the Plaintiff “Race”, “Veteran status” “Religion”, “Peace”, “Will” and “Dignity” at all times by (Beacon et al) there after Plaintiff provide (Christ et al) “legal civil team” evidences, facts, legal support, in their civil countersuit against (Arthur et al).

With details facts of Plaintiff intended legal pursuit of (Arthur et al) in all documents, fax transmissions, letters and records, and Plaintiff Pro Se Civil Counter Civil action against (Arthur et al).

Notwithstanding all “current exhibits” with detail real facts of all photograph evidence filed in the “Honorable Court and the Plaintiff Myspace.com photos on the “Internet” thus far being submitted in the records , depicted and showing Defendant(s) (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al),

And (“Marine Building L.L.C.) such collectively nasty, disgusting trailer trash disgusting nature in being all supposedly Professional Attorneys and Business operating out of “Co-Defendant “Marine Building L.L.C..” with such Nasty, poor un-kept, run down property waste conditions’, creepy drunk commercial painting, useless fire escape safety hazard ,

And “Ton’s, upon, Ton’s, of Client’s “Civil & Criminal Legal” Trash being physically dump on the ground for exposure to ridicule, scorn, mock, tease, jeer at, make fun of, derision, deride, and complete poke fun at. By the General Public of Clients (Arthur et al) and (The Marine Building L.L.C. et al)

Since Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) recorded during 2009- 2010 and now file exhibit(s) in 2011 against the “Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al”, & “Marine Building L.L.C”, and Harry C. Arthur Esq.

Plaintiff moves for Each Defendant(s) and Co-Defendant(s) each and their “perspective Attorneys” filing a response with the clerk in regards to all of the Following (2) Amend Complaint” and for the reasons as stated in above regards to the all of Defendants Collectively actions as Amend Herein the (2) Amend Complaints.

Cause of action

1. The Pro Se Plaintiff reincorporates and state all previously stated cause of actions in the “Original complaint” and The First Amend complaint; as fully enforced and stated herein for:

Wrongful acts and actions collectively conspire to willfully, with full disregards or consequences of their acts/actions committed all in Violations under

Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization,

Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents),

Section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal (RICO) investigations), section 1956 (relating to the laundering of monetary instruments),

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. § 1030 in connection with all criminal (RICO) acts and actions, as described herein, and conspiracies to violate (RICO).

Multiple Schemes and Patterns to commit among other things:

(a) Mail and Wire Fraud as described herein, and conspira-cies to violate (RICO).

(b) Aiding and abetting to commit A Criminal Enterprise in Racketeering against the rights, dignity and will of the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s)

Plaintiff reincorporates and state all previously stated fact in the Original, first amend complaint and (2) Amend Complaint for full Declaratory Judgment

Being made entered into the records of this action that each and every claim, accusation, assertion, contention

And charges in this (2) Amend Complaint as described fully herein against all Defendants, and their agents being entry into the action of this cause in full favor of the Plaintiff

Against each of the Defendants, (Arthur Esq.)

And Co-Defendants (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al),

And Co-Defendants (Marine Building L.L.C.) and Co-Defendants (Christ et al).

Individually and collectively as described herein said complaint being committed all acts and actions, to include

“Obstruction of Justice”, False exhibit of Material facts, Conspiracies to pursue the same Criminal Objective,

Co-Defendant (Christ et al) Violation of the Plaintiff Equal Protection under the Law.

Civil Conspiracy, Actual Fraud, Fraud upon the Court, Malicious Civil Prosecution of a Tort , Injury to Plaintiff Personal Reputation, Impeaching Plaintiff Honesty, Imputation of Crime, Disease and or Sexual Misconduct,

Destruction, alter and or direct destruction of “Material Civil Evidences and Facts”, “Slander of the Plaintiff”, “Libel of Plaintiff”;

And Defamation upon the Plaintiff reputation in this (RICO) Criminal activities

Plaintiff seeks Actual, accumulative, compensatory, consequential, continuing, expectation damages, foreseeable,

Future, incidental, indeterminate, reparable, lawful, proximate, prospective, special, speculative, substantial,

Punitive, Defamation, Discrimination and Permanent damages;

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and Mental Anguish being entry into the records against all Defendants herein to Plaintiff Awarded Compensations Claims for

“Serious past, present ,and future Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and Mental Anguish being imposed, tariff and levy both past, current, and future;

Defendants (Arthur et al), Co-Defendants (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and Co-Defendants

(“Marine Building L.L.C. et al) in the Amount already having been established in the Amend Complaint in excess of $16.2 Million Dollars from a Jury.

To include but not limited to: Exemplary treble damages under (RICO) statue being awarded to the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) as described in the $16.2 Million Dollars Judgment by a Jury.

With 10% being deducted from each and every Defendant herein Namely (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al)

And (The Marine Building L.L.C. et al) from all said judgments awards and compensations by a Jury in this action

And made payable to Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) choice of Charity organization “Namely” “Christ Church Cathedral” if ya Sloooooooow. It’s a

“Cathedral Church for the “Episcopal Diocese of Texas”. The congregation was established in 1839 its address is

1117 Texas Avenue • Houston, Texas 77002 • Phone: 713.222.2593 • Fax: 713.222.2412

And entry into the records against Co-Defendant (Christ Church Cathedral) in the Amount of $2.4 Million Dollars.

With full interest incurred since date of injury of November 23 of 2009

Plaintiff further seek Co-Defendant herein (Christ Church Cathedral et al) make Check payable for Awards/compensation in the amount of: $2,391,350.33

To the Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) choice of Charity organization “Namely”….Drum roll………….

“Christ Church Cathedral” if ya Sloooooooow. It’s a

“Cathedral Church for the “Episcopal Diocese of Texas”. The congregation was established in 1839 its address is

1117 Texas Avenue • Houston, Texas 77002 • Phone: 713.222.2593 • Fax: 713.222.2412

All Defendants’ each herein be made to pay all Court cost, and Any Attorneys Cost.

Plaintiff (Hamilton) seek the Honorable United States District Court Courtesies in Disciplinary referral of Attorney(s) at Law (Arthur et al) to the Texas Lawyer Bar Associated governing Attorney Disciplinary activities for each Attorney Defendant herein

For full legal “Disbarment proceeding commence (ASAP) against” (Arthur et al Attorney at Law(s))

(Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al and (Marine Building L.L.C. Attorneys at law(s) for his entire hostile, extreme, extra special outrageous

Illegal criminal (RICO) conducts, and Fraudulent actions as described herein throughout the (2) Amend Complaint of the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II

And for all “Deem just and being Honorable before this United States Federal Court during a lawful proceeding on the behalf of the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II.

“Conclusion”

Dedications to “Cmdr. Bluefin “Sherlock Holmes Mystery Case of”:

“The Talking Treasure Box”

its Cast:

“Buck and The Preacher man”, “Rick and A.J. Simon”, of “Simon & Simon” “Detective Agency”,

“Ben Matlock”,

“Danny Ocean”,

“Monk”,

And a very sneaky (Thomas Magnum) the little voice in my head….xoxox!

Dated this ______ Day of _________________, 2011

Submitted Respectfully By:

____________________________

Louis Charles Hamilton II

Pro Se Plaintiff

P.O. Box 20126

Houston Texas, 77225

United States District Court

Southern District of Texas

Houston Division

Louis Charles Hamilton II Plaintiff Motion in

Pro Se Plaintiff Opposition to Dismiss, with

“Support Brief and Exhibit(s)”

Vs. Civil action No.H-10-2709

Harry C. Arthur (Esq.)

Defendant

Law office of Harry C. Arthur et al

Co- Defendant(s)

Marine Building, L.L.C. et al

Co-Defendant(s)

Comes now the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II; files his motion, with attached brief and exhibit(s) in support of Plaintiff Motion in Opposition to “not-dismissing “number

cause H-10-2709 in the Civil Matter of Louis Charles Hamilton II vs. Harry C. Arthur et al, now being entertain before the Honorable Court;

And for cause the Plaintiff will show the following:

1. Defendant(s) collectively moves for a “joint dismissal” from this action applying their weird senile reasoning on several factors which the Plaintiff shall address each;

First defendant(s) collectively, Arguments and Authority issue “because of lack of standing “is incorrect

Brief

I.

The Defendant(s) collectively while having several “legal degrees” @ Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al to “boot”,

Quite failing once again to print the “Whole Truth” in a simple honest legal Attorney form”.

“Taxpayers in the State of Texas” “have standing to enjoin the illegal expenditure of public funds”, and “need not demonstrate a particularized injury”.  Which the defendant(s) wishes to mislead the Honorable Court in the Plaintiff current legal standing before the court:

See id.; Calvert v. Hull, 475 S.W.2d 907, 908 (Tex.1972);  Osborne v. Keith, 142 Tex. 262, 177 S.W.2d 198, 200 (1944).  

Implicit in this rule are two requirements:  (1) that the plaintiff is a taxpayer; and (2) that public funds are expended on the allegedly illegal activity.   See Bland, 34 S.W.3d at 556;  Calvert, 475 S.W.2d at 908;  Osborne, 177 S.W.2d at 200.

Yet the Defendant(s) collectively wishes to continue committing to further “pattern and practices” of “Illegal Misrepresentation of all “material facts in the capacity of Attorneys of Law.

(An Attorney whom representing him self has a fool for a client surly applies here)

The Plaintiff further respectfully asserts that:

Williams v. Lara, 52 S.W.3d 171, 178-79 (Tex) do not even apply in this matter:

“Taxpayers in Texas have standing to enjoin the illegal expenditure of public funds, and “need not” demonstrate a particularized injury”.

“Moreover” the Plaintiff is a Veteran of the “Armed Force Services” namely the “United States Navy” *See Attachment exhibit (A); (Plaintiff Veteran ID)

Which such “Legal Services” the (Beacon) provided is a “gift of appreciation” for any “Veteran” returning to a “normal start” in life within Houston Texas”

With the full support by all of the taxpayer “Nation Wide” in association with the United States Federal Government providing a funding to a legal operation to provide not just for the Plaintiff behalf in dire situations needs of being poor,

To include but not limited to the said “Armed Force Services” namely the Navy for argument sake “if being a possible “direct cause” of the Plaintiff being at a state of “Disable American Veteran”

To which said (Beacon) services is still such a services of a gift of appreciation on the Plaintiff behalf and a direct legal needed aid in returning to a normal new start in life with a “Disability” moreover,

Still leaving the (Beacon) and its “legal services” a gift of appreciation for a (DAV) Disable American Veteran being provided that is supported by all of the taxpayers “Nation Wide”,

To include but not limited to the services being provided by the (Beacon) namely Christ Church Cathedral is an act of “Devine Holiness” by its Congregation, Founders, Providers, and inspire by the teaching of Jesus Christ in association with “God” for over 170 years at the present location for not only the need of the Plaintiff but also God’s Children

*See Plaintiff attached exhibit (B)…… (Beacon et al).

The Plaintiff is a “past and currently present” Client of the Beacon in association with “Christ Church Cathedral” especially at the time frame of all of the acts, actions, and incidents against the Plaintiff rights will, and dignity made for the basics of this action as described by the Plaintiff in the Amend Complaint.

*See Attachment exhibit (C); (Plaintiff Client letter in association with the Beacon)

Plaintiff further state Defendant(s) collectively fail to provide before the Honorable Court to the effect “Proof of any written agreements being made between (Arthur et al) and the mystery Confederates in agreement with the (Beacon et al) that the reasoning the “Non-suit filing” was made to support (Arthur et al) false pretense in now the need to cover up the “Defendants collectively criminal mail and wire fraud scheme of things and all other expose “legal Interest” now being described by the Plaintiff;

Plaintiff clearly stated all post cover up “acts and actions” involving alleged “working together” is a front for the Defendant(s) collective “Mail and Wire” fraud scheme of things their after the exposure of (Arthur et al) bogus intents

Through the Professional deposition being conducted against (Arthur et al) in among other things his discrepancies in numerous false finances statements made during his hostile

actions against (Christ) in a complaint and filed before a Harris County court of law;

Such collective “bogus illegal and quite fraudulent intent of the Defendant(s) being brought to light first and foremost by the “exclusive experience work product” and direct examination deposition of (Andy Vickery) and (Kinney IV) Respectful honest Attorneys for (Christ et al) to defeat (Arthur et al) “under oath”.

*See Plaintiff exhibits attached to Plaintiff Motion for a (TRO) in regards to Arthur et al reply to Plaintiff motions for production of the deposition as (Arthur et al) supply information in regards to protecting property financing information’s contain in among other things in the deposition conducted “against” (Arthur et al) by (Christ) et al Professional Honest Attorneys of record Andy Vickery and Kinney IV

Now which Defendants herein collectively attempt this same rouge ploy in said discovery request to with hold from the Plaintiff during civil actions in Harris County Court files.

Plaintiff further respectfully asserts (Vickery) made statements to the effect a deposition of (Arthur) being under oath should clear up his judgment in public news media reports.

II

The Defendant(s) in (Arthur et al) collectively wishes to maintain in the delusions of the Plaintiff was not a party to the “cause of actions” being brought in said suit against (Christ et al) or any damaged being caused by any actions of the defendants as a result of their law suit.

And Plaintiff has no justifiable interest in his allegations made against collectively against all of the Defendants in his complaint.

Plaintiff first respectfully asserts before the Honorable Court and address the non-fictional facts that the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) collectively did not file suit against “Christ Church Cathedral” for:

(1).a sexual misconduct nature of any Defendant(s) herein “genitals” being in violations of some sorts or sodomizing acts being past or present occurred and committed against any of the Defendants rights, will & Dignity; by (Christ et al)

(2). nor did the Defendant(s) collectively seek concrete civil refugee in a suit against (Christ) with concrete claims in a nature that a “Brick” happening to “heavenly dislodge itself” from the “Cathedral high castle structure” and simply pick –n-fall upon any of their collectively heads;

Plaintiff strongly assert before the Honorable Court that These Greedy Nasty Defendant(s) collectively herein made real criminal intent in a “Mail and Wire fraud scheme of things for profit and all bogus claims filed further on the “Honorable Harris County Court Wire” which is then “broadcast” “Nationwide” no less” that the Plaintiff being a client of the beacon *See exhibit (B) Plaintiff letter being a client”

Is in now fact a “nasty dog of a person who cannot hold his crap from his rectum or urine therefore and likes pissing all over the Defendant property Marine Building L.L.C. and all over the city of Houston Texas,

To include Plaintiff is a real panhandler derelict of sorts with “not a simple single purpose in life of any sorts”

“But bum smokes and like dancing in the streets”

Among other crude statements being made in said complaint against (Christ et al)

And the Defendant(s) herein collectively is entitled to a special grand “Hefty” $250,000.00 Dollars and the “Holy soup kitchen with all of its super support local.

To include but not limited to the Federal Government legal support of the (Beacon) for the Plaintiff behalf is “Hereby fully and forever close to boot” cause the Defendants lost some rentals and defendants “main property value” is now in the

“Super Trash Can” and the reasoning is Plaintiff is nasty and lose on the City of Houston Texas. There for the City of Houston now is official “Derelict Town USA”.

And Plaintiff wishes to remind the Honorable Court all of this is base upon the actions of the Defendants et al in a hostile civil suit against (Christ et al) for the relief of direct monetary compensation in value of said whopper of a sum in excess of $250,000.00

But the Plaintiff is not a party…? Nor was the Plaintiff damage in any form….?

First the Plaintiff Respectfully assert to the Honorable Court..! (I really like to slid Arthur Esq. stupid face smooth across the court room ninja style”, until it hit the Jury Box then bounce off and fall asleep on the floor needing a deluxe package ride to the local E.R. and you can have my “Honest Oath” on that one)

And then I will respectfully state before the Honorable Court:

1. Defendant(s) collectively having placing them self on “Legal Death Row” by involving the Plaintiff in this nasty, disgusting, filthy, highly rude, acts for monies in a Federal criminal “mail and wire fraud scheme. (I am not stupid)

2. Notwithstanding total disgrace the Plaintiff before the eyes of god seeking hostile actions against a Holy Church in vain of and against the Plaintiff name, dignity, and will

3. And in doing this, said collective Defendant(s) herein further sought to attempting in stealing from a “Holy Church” $250,000.00 Dollars, with a permanent enforce closure on the “legal homeless soup kitchen operations” and take the Plaintiff name in vain no less among others with this actions also,

4. Not with standing facts that the Plaintiff being a person whom already is in the need of no more “current legal problems in his name before a “Honorable Court”

5. And all these Defendants collectively wondering why..? The organizer /leader “Commander in Chief “Harry C. Arthur Esq.” in this collective “Mail and Wire Fraud scheme of thing complaint made against the Plaintiff rights, will and dignity being that (Arthur Esq.) personal face is not crumble, bleeding, and good –n- broken up..? I will tell you why for the following special reasons:

6. The Law that’s why…

7. My Doctor is the next reasoning whom having to supply Plaintiff medications in regards to this disrespectful dis-play for greed

8. *See Plaintiff Original Complaint with Original Medical Records on file at the Harris County Court House in Houston Texas in the Matter of: Louis Charles Hamilton II vs. Harry C. Arthur The Marine Building, L.L.C. et al 2009-80663

Plaintiff will respectfully strongly assert before the Honorable Court that the VAMC Mental Doctor is quit cable in telling the Honorable Court to his/her face information in regards to Plaintiff medical records and (Arthur et al) disposition standing with the Pro Se Plaintiff” at the past and current time frame.

Plaintiff further refer the Honorable court *See Plaintiff exhibits attached in Plaintiff motion to secure commercial business records among other things that facts showing (Arthur et al) each and every reply of Defendants collectively herein conjure wrongfully against Plaintiff rights for said Deposition.

To include Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) stating Plaintiff has direct emotional Issues in their reply to hide the discovery deposition.

The Plaintiff can show the Honorable Court that there is Justice the Plaintiff move to Houston Texas which the Plaintiff supply the Defendant(s) all theses factories and Plaintiff reasoning for sought refugee in Christ Church Cathedral namely the (Beacon) while Plaintiff render legal services to several

Defendants in order to escape from harm and pursue civil actions

As described in Plaintiff exhibit (D) *Clerk’s Entry of Default.

On a Murder for Hire Scheme to Kill the Plaintiff namely Louis Charles Hamilton II in this Action also

With attached copy of said Civil Complaint No. 1:10-CV-55 *Plaintiff exhibit (E) in which those crooked Defendants therein having any further criminal intent to even dream of entertaining any guest appearance before the Honorable United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division (Honorable Hang Judge) for all of the Illegal RICO Crooked committed to The Elderly, Senior Handicap, IRS, FEMA, Private Insurances Companies, to include but not limited to the Plaintiff pain, suffering and direct losses

Which the Plaintiff Respectfully Assert the Defendants collectively herein (Arthur et al) having been provided all of the same exhibits during litigation in Harris County records which Defendants collectively continue to execute a criminal scheme to still wrongfully described the Plaintiff in a nasty state with their strong condemning Proof of the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II being a “Derelict as described in their complaint and Plaintiff pursuit of any Federals actions means Plaintiff is a true

Derelict as described in (Arthur Esq.) reply to Plaintiff discovery request.

Yet these crooks forgot they are attempting to rip off (Christ et al) in the Vain of the Plaintiff name

Plaintiff further assert that Plaintiff then further supply Defendant(s) in (Arthur et al) The Plaintiff legal attempts at further escape from further harm, loss wages and pursue of further civil justice as described in Plaintiff exhibit (F) Civil complaint made against (Trail et al) Federal Civil action No. 1:09-cv-496 attached herein

While the Plaintiff is in further pursuit of lost income as described in plaintiff exhibits (G) New Orleans civil action Cause No. 1:09-cv-289 with the Honorable Court report and recommendations of Dennis et al filed herein the exhibits herein

Plaintiff having in the past supplied same to Defendants in (Arthur et al) to attempt to salvage Plaintiff lost reputation at the Hands of each and every one of the Collective Defendants herein

To include but not limited to the Plaintiff engaging in the cruel corruption already filed civil actions of the criminal involvements of “Doctor Samuel Benjamin Magnus Lawson

M.D.” Against the rights, will, and dignity of the Plaintiff stupid sister Johanna Ann Magnus-Lawson (Hamilton)

*See Backpage.com “Sherlock Holmes” mystery story: case of “The Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor” by: Louis Charles Hamilton II (Cmdr. Bluefin).

But the Defendant(s) herein having defame and continual to do the same as stated to the point Plaintiff is in fact now a proven “Derelict” now for even being involved in any said numerous civil actions as described above in Plaintiff exhibit E, F and G Defendants reply to the Plaintiff in a legal set of interrogatories *See Plaintiff exhibit attached to Plaintiff motion to secure records. Arthur reply to Plaintiff interrogatories, request for admission and Production of Documents.

Which Plaintiff respectfully assert before the Honorable Court said evidence was provided to Defendants collectively to consider in making their choice of continual rash, rude, harsh treatments of the Plaintiff respect, rights for life, being now at the hand of the defendants collective ridicule civil action.

In fact the Plaintiff honest position both “past and present” is (Arthur et al) is full of “Fraudulent false fictitious massive “shifty bogus lying legal crap”.

The Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) complaint against (Christ et al) was in the nature of seeking monetary relief for the so call property damages, and property value loss in lieu of Plaintiff alleged acts,

Yet the Defendants collectively continue to disregard their own “actual property value” by the Defendants on mismanagements mistake in Commercial Property up keeps by way of the following:

k. The continual human waste already complain of still be-ing published and posted for over a 2 year period of time*See Plaintiff exhibit (P-1), photo in 2009

l. The continual mismanagements in the past drunken failed exterior painting project of the commercial prop-erty and any future up keep in this area being provided for over a period of 2 years. *See Plaintiff exhibit (P-2) photo in 2009

m. The continual mismanagements in the safety in the fire escape extreme and needed up keep *See Plaintiff exhibit (P-3), photo in 2009

n. The continual mismanagements in nasty restaurant trash simply left about on the ground for lots of rodents’ for over a period of 2 years *See Plaintiff exhibit (P-4) photo in 2009

o. The continual mismanagements in the finances needed to provide for all of the extreme and well over due needs as described in paragraph a, b, c, and d above The continual human waste already complain of still being published and posted for over a 2 year period of time*See Plaintiff exhibit (P-1), photo in 2009

p. The continual mismanagements in the past drunken failed exterior painting project of the commercial prop-erty and any future up keep in this area being provided for over a period of 2 years. *See Plaintiff exhibit the new 2010 series of pictures….

q. The pictures showing continual mismanagements in the safety in the fire escape extreme and needed up keep *See Plaintiff exhibit 2010 up dated

r. The continual mismanagements in restaurant trash sim-ply left about on the ground for rodents’ for over a pe-riod of 2 years *See Plaintiff exhibit 2010 up date

s. The continual mismanagements in the finances needed to provide for all of the extreme and well over due needs as described in paragraph a, b, c, and d above with 2010 photograph up detail up date.

t. With the Illegal Immigrants attempt at futile repairs

Plaintiff was in fact both a direct and indirect party of all wrongful involvements as described by the Defendant(s) own wording in the complaint against (Christ et al)

And serious damages did in fact occurred by all of the collectively hostile, extreme and outrageous acts and actions of the Defendants as described in the Plaintiff original Complaint, Amend Complaint, all motions and exhibits currently before the Honorable Court.

With all Plaintiff mental medical records on file at the Harris County in support of the Defendant causing Plaintiff intentional emotional harm, complete sever mental anguish

Defendant(s) collectively sought Ultra Vires Acts in their cruel presentations made against (Christ et al) with claims of a profound impact that the “Nasty Plaintiff” impose on the Public interest, health, and safety as described in (Arthur et al) complaint against (Christ et al)

In addition the Defendants herein collectively sought to impose a “less value of worth” towards the public impression of the Plaintiff base upon the complaint, while inciting racial hate, ridicule of a scheme for monetary funds against (Christ et al) thinking (Christ et al) is weak unprotected & meanwhile the scum Derelicts & panhandlers pose no threat and

Are too stupid to under stand the Defendants herein collectively Criminal RICO “Mail and Wire” Fraud Scheme of things for greed, and the Plaintiff too legal weak and unprotected cause he is street trash.

Conclusion

Plaintiff Amend Complaint states a long list of cause of actions requiring the Defendant(s) collectively herein to be held fully “responsible and most accountable” for all of these criminal and civil acts and actions described against the Plaintiff peaceful rights, will, and dignity as described therein,

Defendant collectively having cause enough “emotional trauma” and National disrespect to the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II and rightfully so causing undue disrespectful behavior of the same criminal RICO “Mail and Wire nature to others similarly the same.

Not with standing giving the (Beacon) namely “Christ Church Cathedral et al” a notable wrongful “black eye” in vain of the Plaintiff name

Notwithstanding current exhibits with detail real facts of all photograph evidence thus far being submitted, depicted and showing Defendant(s) such collectively nasty, disgusting trailer trash nature in being professional Attorneys and Business

operating out of Marine Building L.L.C.. Nasty, poor un-kept, run down property waste conditions’

While these real dogs of a well organized syndicate style crooks label the Plaintiff among other things “nasty”.

“A reputable lawyer will advise you to keep out of law, make the best of a foolish bargain, and not get caught again”.

Mark Twain;

Letter to Charles H. Webb, 8 Apr. 1875”

Wherefore the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, moves now in this number above matter,

Moves respectfully that the Honorable Court hereby do in fact deny Defendant(s) herein the matter of defendants (Arthur et al) collective motions to dismiss the Complaint of the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II in its entirety with full extra special prejudice, (With a added Sugar on Top)

And for any and all other relief Pro Se Plaintiff herein seeks being awarded fairly in Justice before the Honorable Court.

By; _____________________________

Louis Charles Hamilton II

Pro Se Plaintiff

P.O. Box 20126

Houston Texas 77225

The Plaintiff will show the Above entitled “Honorable Court” that in the past (President Andrew Johnson) did willfully through his criminal version of Reconstruction did establish “Second class citizenship for the (Negro) Plaintiff herein (Louis Charles Hamilton II) Black African-American within the defendant (The United States of America and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas)

And the Defendant (The United States of America and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) continue holding the same “Second class citizenship upon the “Plaintiff in (Among other Things) “Suit in Civil Common Law” .

The Plaintiff assert before the Honorable Court that the Defendant (The United States of America) continue fearing that their political and social dominance is threatened in 2009 though out 2011, have continue turned to numerous illegal direct means to prevent (Negro) black Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) from gaining equality and equal protection of the law during “Civil Judicial

Proceedings” within the Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas).

Plaintiff assert “Black Codes laws” passed by Southern state namely Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) legislatures immediately after the “Civil War” that defined and regulated the legal status of the emancipated Plaintiff descendant family members as slaves

The Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) immediately set about writing racist segregationist laws known as Black Codes between the years of 1865 and 1866.

The Plaintiff and his past family (Negroes) Blacks African American could not vote, hold public office, serve on juries, own firearms, enlist in the military, or testify in court cases involving whites.

The Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-defendant (The State of Texas) herein as of this undersigned date in the year of 2011,

Continue a legal recourse system against the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) Black African-Americans in an impoverished state and under the control of all the white man control in (among other things) suit in common law that virtually strip the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) herein of all civil rights in suit in

common law against a “Whiteman” namely (Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law) in Houston Texas

Because the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) is a Negro (Nigger) under still established “Black Codes Laws” having been supposed, understood, said, held, aimed, and expected abolish by the Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) and the very idea of civil equality between the races of the Plaintiff (Negro) with the race of (Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law) a “Whiteman” is as absurd, ridiculous, meaningless incongruous and very unacceptable in suit in civil common law in 2011 within the Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas).

The Plaintiff will demonstrate before the Honorable Court that the “Dred Scott Case of 1857” that the Supreme Court ruled that The Plaintiff (Negro) ancestry could not be constitutionally considered citizens of the Defendant (The United States of America) and therefore Plaintiff (Negro) is not covered

Or furthermore the Plaintiff is not entitled by the “Bill of Rights” of the Defendants (The United States of America) nor could Plaintiff (Negro) Black receive the benefits of (Defendants) herein citizenship and therefore Dred Scott could not use or file a complaint in the Federal Court System and returned to slavery at the hands of the Defendant (The United States Of America). the U.S.

Supreme Court ruled against him--also ruling that the Bill of Rights didn't apply to African Americans which is standing in this very date of 2011.

The Plaintiff will prove that the Judiciary of the Defendant (The United States of America) and (The States of Texas) has Demonstrated continual “racial bias in it's rulings against the Plaintiff because he is a (Negro) doing so in favor of protection a “Whiteman” namely in the matter of “Harry C. Arthur et al”, Law office of Harry C. Arthur et, al, and The Marine Building L.L.C. which is in National News as Attached below iinvolving The Plaintiff, Defendant (Arthur et al) and Co-Defendant (Christ Church Cathedral” as follows:

Homeless Center Faces Legal Battles

By Hasti Taghi

POSTED: Wednesday, January 13, 2010

UPDATED: 12:22 pm CST January 13, 2010

HOUSTON -- A day center that served more than 10,000 homeless people in downtown Houston last year is facing a lawsuit, KPRC Local 2 reported Tuesday.

WATCH IT: Business Sues Over Homeless

The lawsuit was filed by the center's neighbor, attorney Harry Arthur. But for the homeless who use the facility four days a week, the legal jargon isn't fixing the problem.

"It's not Beacon's problem. Its everybody's problem," said Louis Hamilton II, a homeless veteran and client of The Beacon, which is operated by Christ Church Cathedral.

Hamilton said the Beacon helps many of Houston's homeless who are finding it even more difficult to get off the streets because of the tough economy.

Hamilton said he's filing a lawsuit against Arthur, a kind of counter-attack on a lawsuit filed by a man suing The Beacon, trying to shut it down.

"Over a period of a time, all the people who hang on the street and sleep on the sidewalk and urinate, defecate on everyone else's property," Arthur said. "I just finally reached a point where I just couldn't take it anymore."

In the lawsuit, Arthur said the operation has "turned into a danger to the health and safety of others in the adjacent areas and a 'nuisance' to neighboring property owners."

Arthur claims not only are businesses leaving the area, but his property value has depreciated since The Beacon opened it's doors in 2007.

"I don't think it's possible to have that many people and operate the way they operate without it impacting your neighbors," said Arthur.

The Beacon has filed its original answer to the lawsuit and denies any allegations that their clients are derelicts or are a nuisance to the community.

"Part of our community is the homeless community," said Tracy Burnett, executive director of The Beacon.

The Beacon is not the only homeless center in the area. According to the Coalition for the Homeless of Houston, there are up to four more facilities in the surrounding area and the neighborly dispute isn't segregated to this area.

"This is something that every neighborhood complains about … that see people who are homeless in their community whether it is one or a thousand, people are complaining," said Anthony Love of the Coalition for the Homeless.

But for Arthur and several other businesses, the only solution is closing The Beacon.

"My thinking is, it's a great idea to feed them, but I don't think they have to do it in the downtown business district where people live and people are trying to operate businesses," said Arthur.

The Beacon said it has taken steps to alleviate the problem. One is opening even on days that it's not open to take the homeless off the streets.

Lawyers for The Beacon said their next move is to take Arthur's deposition to hear what he has to say under oath. If all else fails, a trial is set for Nov. 15.

Homeless Man Seeks $2.4 Million From Lawyer Over Nuisance SuitBrenda Sapino Jeffreys

Texas LawyerJanuary 11, 2010

Houston lawyer Harry C. Arthur touched a nerve in one homeless man when Arthur filed a state court suit in November seeking to shut down a church-sponsored operation in downtown Houston that provides meals, counseling and laundry service for homeless people.

In Harry C. Arthur, et al. v. Christ Church Cathedral, et al., Arthur and The Marine Building, an office building Arthur owns, seek a permanent injunction to shut down The Beacon, the homeless center, on the ground it's a "private nuisance."

A month after Arthur filed his suit against defendants Christ Church Cathedral and The Beacon, Louis Charles Hamilton II filed a pro se suit seeking a minimum of $2.4 million in actual and punitive damages from Arthur and The Marine Building and an apology from Arthur in a local newspaper for allegations made in Christ Church Cathedral.

In his Dec. 22 petition in Hamilton v. Arthur, et al., Hamilton says he is a veteran of the U.S. Navy who uses services at The Beacon.

Hamilton alleges that in Christ Church Cathedral Arthur and the building "unflinchingly, courageously" and with an "audaciously bold potty mouth" and a "lost aptitude on life" accused people who are fed at The Beacon of being "derelicts," among other things.

Arthur's petition in Christ Church Cathedral does not mention Hamilton or any specific homeless individuals.

Hamilton alleges the plaintiffs in Christ Church Cathedral seek "ungodly pilferage" from the cathedral for its affiliation with The Beacon. Hamilton also alleges Arthur and the building

have a "twisted heart full of unwashed socks, with a soul full of gunk Grinch type crappie act(s)" because of the petition they filed against the "Holy Church."

Hamilton writes, "The Plaintiff will show this Honorable Court that at no time did the Plaintiff take a part in pissing, crapping and or vomiting or any other bodily fluid discharge being wrongfully placed at the property of the Defendants.

" Hamilton says he will prove to a judge that he is not a derelict and that Arthur and the building chose to discriminate against him.

In his petition, Hamilton asks 215th District Judge Steven Kirkland to award him $1.8 million in actual damages for defamation, discriminatory practices, emotional distress and mental anguish, $600,000 in punitives and a printed apology.

Hamilton, who came to Houston from Jefferson County in the summer of 2009, says in an interview that if he's successful in winning monetary damages from Arthur and his building, he will share the money with the cathedral.

Hamilton says he has never met Arthur, but is

anxious to talk to him in court.

"He ticked me off really bad ... and he's going after the church, and my grandmother was a nun. He disrespected my family by calling me a derelict," Hamilton says.

Hamilton says he is a regular client of The Beacon and while he currently is homeless, he regularly visits a U.S. Veterans Center where he also receives his mail. The veterans center is located near The Beacon and The Marine Building.

Arthur, of the Law Offices of Harry C. Arthur, did not return a telephone call seeking his response to Hamilton's suit. But in a Jan. 5 interview, Arthur said,

"The idea of feeding them and helping them [homeless people] is OK, but I don't think you should do it with everyone around you." He said the cathedral and The Beacon should assist the homeless somewhere outside Houston's central business district.

Arthur says he receives several nasty e-mails a day about his suit.

BREAK BREAD

In Christ Church Cathedral, filed on Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days before Thanksgiving -- Arthur and The Marine Building seek a minimum of $250,000 in damages from Christ Church Cathedral

and The Beacon to compensate them for the loss of rentals in the three-story building and its market value.

Arthur's trial firm is in the building, which is located diagonally across an intersection from The Beacon. The Beacon is operated by Cathedral Health & Outreach Ministries, a nonprofit established by the cathedral.

 

February 2004

67 Tex Bar J 149

RESIGNATIONS

On Nov. 4, the Supreme Court of Texas accepted the resignation, in lieu of discipline, of Alain G. Harvey, 41, of Houston.

On Nov. 19, the Supreme Court of Texas accepted the resignation, in lieu of discipline, of Gerald B. Scheve, 72, of Houston.

On Oct. 1, the Supreme Court of Texas the resignation, in lieu of discipline, of Bradley David Waytt, 40, of Bryan.

DISBARMENTS

On Nov. 12, Aaron L . Bullock, 58, of Kingwood was disbarred by the District 4-F Grievance Committee.

On Nov. 13, James Richard Callahan, 52, of Addison was disbarred by the District 6-A Grievance Committee.

On Nov. 30, 2003, Ghoson Gus Haddad, 49, of

Houston was disbarred by the District 4-A Grievance Committee.

On Nov. 17, Alexander Wallenwein, 44, of Houston was disbarred by the District 4-G Grievance Committee.

On Oct, 27, E.J. Van Buren, Jr., 45, of Houston was disbarred by the 164th District Court of Harris County.

On Aug. 27, John WorldPeace, 55, of Houston was disbarred by the 269th District Court of Harris County.

SUSPENSIONS

On Nov. 20, G.A. Adesanya, 43, of Houston received a one-year, fully-probated suspension effective Nov. 1, 2003 from the District 4-H Grievance Committee.

On Sept. 29, Ronald Delarose, 63, of Lubbock received a 15-month, fully-probated suspension effective Dec. 1, 2003 from the District 7-B Grievance Committee.

On Oct. 31, Robert Hoffman, 58, of Dallas received a two-year, partially-probated suspension effective Nov. 1, 2003, with the first two months actively served and the remainder probated.

On Nov. 5, Morris J. Kirschberg, 57, of San Antonio received a three-year, partially-probated suspension effective Nov. 21, 2003, with the first six months actively served and the remainder probated.

On Aug. 7, Oscar Rual Tamez, 72, of Houston received a six-month, fully-probated suspension effective Aug. 1, 2003 from the District 10-B Grievance Committee.

On June 26, Carl Payne Tobey, 60, of Boerne received a one-year, fully-probated suspension effective Sept. 1, 2003 from the District 10-B Grievance Committee.

On Oct. 21, Cheryl Gillum Turner, 46, of Houston received a one-year, partially-probated suspension effective Dec. 15, 2003, with the first six months actively served and the remainder probated from the 4-D Grievance Committee.

PUBLIC REPRIMANDS

On July 3, Thomas Stuart Nelson, 55, of Carrollton accepted a public reprimand from the District 6-A Grievance Committee.

On May 8, Antonio Reyes-Vidal, 54, of San Antonio accepted a public reprimand from the District 10-B Grievance Committee.

On Nov. 5, Harry C. Arthur, 62, of Houston accepted a public reprimand from the District 4-G Grievance Committee.

On Sept. 18, 2003, Mark M. Ferguson, 42, of San Antonio accepted a public reprimand from the District 10-B Grievance Committee.

On Nov. 6, G. Lance Holland, 53, of Odessa accepted a public reprimand from the District 15-D Grievance Committee.

On Aug. 14, Barabara Key Woodward, 49, of San Antonio accepted a public reprimand from the District 10-B Grievance Committee.

On Sept. 18, Arthur G. Vega, 51, of San Antonio accepted a public reprimand from the District 10-B Griecance Committee.

On Oct. 9, Fernando Ramos, 56, of San Antonio accepted a public reprimand from the District 10-B Grievance Committee.

On Nov. 5, Gordon M. White, 44, of Houston accepted a public reprimand from the District 5-A Grievance Committee.

ORDER OF THE §UPRJEME COURT OF TEXAS§

Misc. Docket No. 03 - -.9035...c~

Appointment of a District Judge

to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action

The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints

the Honorable Carole W. Clark, Judge of

the 321st District Court of Smith County,

Texas, to preside in the Disciplinary Action styled

The Commison for Lawyer Discipline V. Harry C. Arthur

to be filed in a District Court of Harris County, Texas.

The Clerk of the Supreme Court shall promptly forward to the District Clerk of HarrisCounty, Texas,

a copy of the Disciplinary Petition

and this Order for filing pursuant to Rule3.03,

Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure.

As ordered by the Supreme Court of Texas,

in chambers,

With the Seal thereof affixed at the CityOf Austin,

this~day of March, 2003.

ANDREW WEBER, CLERK

SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

This assignment, made by Misc. Docket No. 03-9035,

is also an assignment by the Chief

Justice of the Supreme Court pursuant to Texas Government Code, §74.057.

Signed this~day of March, 2003.

 

In The District Court

215th Judicial District

Harris County, Texas

Cause No. 2009-80663

Louis Charles Hamilton II Plaintiff

Plaintiff Motion to Compel

Vs. Production of Document

Harry C. Arthur (Esq.)

Marine Building, L.L.C.

Defendant(s)

Comes Now the Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, hereby files a Motion to Compel Production of the following documents from Defendant herein (Arthur et al) and for “good caused” the Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court as follows:

Introduction

Law 101.

University of “common sense”... () I

The Attorney-Client Privilege

Background

The Attorney – Client Privilege is an evidentiary rule that protects both attorneys and their clients from being compelled to disclose confidential communications between them made for the purpose of furnishing or obtaining legal advice or assistance. The privilege is designed to foster frank, open, and uninhibited discourse between attorney and their client;

So that the client’s legal needs are competently addressed by a fully prepared attorney who is cognizant of all the relevant information the client can provide.

The attorney- client privilege may be raise during any type of legal proceeding, civil, criminal, and or administrative, and at any time during those proceedings, pre-trail, during trail, or post- trial.

The privileged dates back to ancient Rome, where governors where forbidden from calling their advocates as witnesses out of concern that the governors would lose confidence in their own defenders. In (1577) the first evidentiary privilege recognized by the English COMMON LAW was the attorney- client privilege. The English common law protected the confidential nature of attorney – client communications, regardless of whether those communications took place in public or in private. The American colonies adopted this approach to the attorney - client privilege, and Delaware codified the privilege in its first constitution 1776.

Elements of the Attorney-Client Privilege

Because the attorney- client privilege often prevents disclosure of information that would be relevant to a legal proceeding, courts are cautious when examining objections grounded in the privilege. Most courts generally require that certain elements be demonstrate before finding that the

privilege applies. Although the elements vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, one often cited recitation of the elements was articulated in U.S. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 89 F. Spp. 357 (D. Mass. 1950), where the court enumerated the five-part test:

(1) The person asserting the privilege must be a client or someone attempting to establish a relationship as a client;

(2) The person with whom the client communicated must be an attorney and acting in the capacity as an attorney at the time of the communication;

(3) The communication must be between the attorney and the client exclusively;

(4) The communication must be for the purpose of securing a legal opinion, legal services, or assistances in some legal proceeding, and for the purpose of committing a crime or Fraud;

(5) The privilege may be claimed or waived by the client only.

Whether the client is a natural person or a corporation, the attorney-client privilege belongs only to the client and not to the attorney. As a result, clients can prevent attorneys from divulging their secrets, but attorneys have no power to prevent their clients from choosing to waive the privilege and testifying

in court, talking to the police, or otherwise sharing confidential attorney-client information with third parties not privy to the confidential discussions. Clients may waive attorney-client privilege expressly by their words or implicitly by their conduct, but a court will only find that the privilege has been waived if there is a clear indication that the client did not take steps to keep the communications confidential. An attorney's or a client's inadvertent disclosure of confidential information to a third party will not normally suffice to constitute WAIVER. If a client decides against waiving the privilege, the attorney may then assert the privilege on behalf of the client to shield both the client and the attorney from having to divulge confidential information shared during their relationship.

In American civil procedure, the work-product doctrine protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation from discovery by opposing counsel.[1] It is also known as the work-product rule, the work-product immunity, the work-product privilege (somewhat erroneous terminology), and the work-product exception.

Work-Product Doctrine

Under the work-product doctrine, "tangible material or its intangible equivalent" that is collected or prepared in anticipation of litigation is not discoverable,

[2] And may be shielded from discovery by a Protective Order, unless the party seeking discovery can demonstrate that the sought facts can only be obtained through discovery and that those facts are indispensable for impeaching or substantiating a claim.[3] That is, the party unable to obtain the information has no other means of obtaining the information without undue hardship. For example, the witness may have left the country. Where the required showing is made, the court will still protect mental impressions of an attorney by redacting that part of the document containing the mental impressions.

Comparison with attorney-client privilege

The work-product doctrine is more inclusive than attorney-client privilege. Unlike the attorney-client privilege, which includes only communications between an attorney and his client, work-product includes materials prepared by persons other than the attorney himself: The materials may have been prepared by anybody as long as they were prepared with an eye towards the realistic possibility of impending litigation. Additionally, it includes materials collected for the attorney such as interrogatories, signed statements, other information acquired for the prosecution or defense of a case, "memoranda, briefs, communications . . . other writings prepared by counsel for his own use in prosecuting his client's case . . . mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories."[3]

However, the work-product doctrine is also less powerful than the attorney-client privilege because it is not a privilege, and therefore may be overcome by a showing of necessity, as described above.

History

The work-product doctrine originated in the 1947 case of Hickman v. Taylor, in which the Supreme Court affirmed a United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decision which excluded from discovery of oral and written statements made by witnesses to a defendant's attorney.[3] The Supreme Court, acting at the recommendation of the Advisory Committee of the Judicial Conference, later enshrined this doctrine formally in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as Rule 26(b)(3).[4]

1. The Plaintiff gave the Defendant in this action Harry C. Arthur Esq. the following Notice pursuant to: Rule 193.7 Notice attached to the original disclosure request of the Plaintiff; attached as Plaintiff Exhibit (H)

“Pursuant to rule 193.7 of the Texas Rules of civil Pro-cedure, Plaintiff hereby gives notice that all documents produced by any Plaintiff or Defendant will be used at pretrial proceeding or at the Trial of this matter”.

2. The Plaintiff filed a Third Party request with (Christ Church Cathedral et al), * attached as Plaintiff exhibit (F);

3. The Plaintiff filed with Defendant (Arthur et al) (among other things) a request for Production of document * attached as Plaintiff exhibit (G)

4. The Production of document for said Deposition of (Arthur et al) is the evidence (among others) the Plain-tiff now seeks and is in fact “the work product” of the (Defendant(s) Christ Church Cathedral et al) obtain ser-vices through the Law Firm of Vickery, Waldner & Mallia, LLP and Kenny IV Esq. namely (Andy & Kenny IV)

5. The Plaintiff respectfully assert before this Honorable Court that all surrounding facts” in regards of the “Pro-fessional legal piranhas” (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) and the work product thereof That….The Plaintiff can safely assume said “legal piranhas team” conducted such a “Hell of a work product…before hand with “precise questions of legal strategy of devastation” and being the said work production of one Hell/Holy damaging Deposition” by said way of said “work products” of (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) execution in direct examination on said defendant (Arthur et al) in the past…that;

6. The Plaintiff can respectfully and safely assume and as-sert before this particular Honorable Court that the non-suit filed by (Arthur et al) in the previous action (Arthur et al) Plaintiff vs. (Cathedral et al) Defendant(s) is a “direct proximate result” of their (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) “Professional legal piranhas” combine “excellent

bone picking “work products” in anticipation of litiga-tion with Arthur Esq. /et al” in legal defense of and acting as (Attorney(s) of record for (Defendants Christ Church Cathedral et al) at the time said “Professional legal piranhas” ()…(Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) conducted said deposition…and the deposition is in no way or fashion can ever be claim the “work product” of (Arthur et al) in this particular action.

7. Now Defendant to this action one (Arthur Esq. / et al) boldly and foolishly is now desecrating such the “Hon-orable Work Product” of the two Professional legal pi-ranhas” as described above.

8. By way of claiming work product of another Attorney(s) namely (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) the “Profes-sional legal piranhas” listed above who’s legal wording design in the deposition is the work product against (Arthur et al) in the past and not some materials that may having been prepared by (Arthur et al) “himself” with an eye towards the realistic possibilities in de-fense of this particular impending litigation against The Plaintiff (Hamilton II)

And or materials that (Arthur Esq.) prepared in defense of him self in his on direct examination...? In the previous civil action against the “Holy Church”.

9. Defendant (Arthur et al) seems to think now collectively combining his other wrongful acts and actions precisely committed and directed against the Plaintiff rights and dignity in the past that any future defamatory acts and further fraudulent practices by said defendant (Arthur et al) in the now stated claims of the work product of another Attorney(s) deposition…

Is the same/equivalent as if claiming the Plaintiff to be a total “water/egg head bumpkin ” from Jefferson County, Texas whom happen to fallen of a Long Horn Cattle truck in a pasture field upon a petrified pieces of cow crap …thus providing the Plaintiff already being further in a state …from all leaves of his own common sense and

fully rendering this Plaintiff (Hamilton II) as a previously mentioned total “water/egg head bumpkin” ignorant of all of the Civil Court laws of the United States “that even a 5th grader can figure out” in regards to the “work product” and or “Attorney/client doctrine” defendants (Arthur et al) now seeks foolish refuge under.

II

Arguments

The Defendant(s) herein (Harry C. Arthur Esq.) and (The Marine Building L. L. C. et al) collectively hereafter named (Arthur et al)

In this particular style Pro Se action, Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) collectively seeks to (among other things) cause undue-delay(s) in this cause by way of (Arthur et al) enjoyment

And now fraudulent abuse by (Arthur et al) position and privileges collectively as being the acting Attorney of record,

Acting actually as a Attorney within the State of Texas; especially; In this cause of action over all of the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) “legal affairs” in this particular complaint;

Which “He is in the flesh being (Arthur Esq./Defendant et al) on the “court docket” acting and representing his “self interest” of (Arthur et al) and the Marine Building L. L. C. et al self Interest,

Which “He in the flesh” in all practical sense is (Arthur Esq.) protecting Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) self interest regardless if he is an Attorney or a Civilian both having the same interest.

Plaintiff file for among other things in a discovery devise of a Request for Production of documents requesting (among other things)

Complete copies of all Interrogatories, Request of Admissions, Deposition, Defendant (Arthur et al) engaged in with the Plaintiff Third Party namely : (Christ Church Cathedral et al),

To include but not limited to, Plaintiff also requested other “relevant material discovery documents” which the Plaintiff shall address last;

Defendant (Arthur et al) filed suit against (“Christ Church Cathedral et al)”, here after named (Cathedral et al) and in their Defense of (Arthur the Plaintiff Then) Defendant then (Cathedral et al) obtain the services of the Law Firm of Vickery, Waldner & Mallia, LLP and Kenny IV Esq.

Defendant(s) in this particular complaint (Arthur et al) acting as Attorney for the Plaintiff in (Arthur et al vs. Cathedral et al))

Now said defendant herein (Arthur et al) having been served said request for production of documents namely: Production of a Deposition

Which facts correctly dictate thus said deposition having been the work product by Defendants (Cathedral et al) acting Attorney(s) of record (Vickery and Kenny IV) with other possible valuable discovery document(s) being requested from (Arthur et al) in connection to work product of said acting

Attorneys of record listed above before the behalf of the Holy Church; Namely Christ Church Cathedral;

Moreover (Vickery & Kenny IV) them-self in fact conducted said deposition on said Defendant(s) (Cathedral et al) behalf during this same time period with (Arthur Esq.) under direct examination of the work product of (Vickery & Kenny IV) in the previously action now filed under a non-suit status in (Harry C. Arthur Esq.) and (The Marine Building L. L. C. et al) vs. Cathedral et al));

Both (Vickery & Kenny IV) them-self in fact having been previously in preparation in anticipation of an eye towards the realistic possibility of impending litigation in the action previously already done in the past;

Which he” (Arthur et al) is also in fact a Defendant now; instead of the Plaintiff in the past; to this action;

Which he” (Arthur et al) now boldly , fraudulent and foolishly refused to comply with the Plaintiff legal rights of a Discovery request device for Production of Documents namely “Deposition” being already conducted against this particular defendant to this action

(Among other things) and said request is now attached as Plaintiff exhibit (G) herein with the records to this cause;

And he” (Arthur et al) seeks to imply and invoke some sort of Attorney - client privilege and work – product doctrine exist over the Plaintiff Production request in favor for the defendant (Arthur Esq. / et al) to this action;

To include but not limited to defendants (Arthur et al) express wishes to invoke said Attorney/client privileges when such a levy against the Plaintiff rightful discovery request does not exist for said defendant;

To include but not limited to such outstanding facts that (Arthur et al) most certainly do not meet the pre-requisite requirements and previews that’s list below:

(1) The person asserting the privilege must be a client or someone attempting to establish a relationship as a client;

(2) The person with whom the client communicated must be an attorney and acting in the capacity as an attorney at the time of the communication;

(3) The communication must be between the attorney and the client exclusively;

(4) The communication must be for the purpose of securing a legal opinion, legal services, or assistances in some legal proceeding, and for the purpose of committing a crime or Fraud;

(5) The privilege may be claimed or waived by the client only.

To include but not limited to such further outstanding facts that (Arthur et al) most certainly do not meet the pre-requisite requirements and previews of the work- product doctrine that’s list below:

“The materials may have been prepared by anybody as long as they were prepared with an eye towards the realistic possibility of impending litigation”

Defendant (Arthur et al) cannot reasonably be claiming now before the Plaintiff and this Honorable Court that the work product of (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) the “Professional legal piranhas” prepared materials that was induce in a deposition against (Arthur Esq.) was intended for this particular Plaintiff (Hamilton II)” Civil Action to be frozen under a “Work –product of the Attorney/client relationship between (Arthur Esq.) and his client (Arthur et al);

To include but not limited to all materials, writings prepared, memoranda, briefs, communications. .

To include also mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories." And or other writings prepared by and collected for the Attorney(s), (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) such as interrogatories, request for admissions, signed statements,

other information acquired for the defense of (Arthur Esq.) in (Harry C. Arthur Esq.) and (The Marine Building L. L. C. et al) vs. ( Cathedral et al) ); is also the work-product of (Arthur Esq.) in this particular civil action Hamilton II vs. Arthur et al..?

All of the said discovery request(s) the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) seeks is very relevant and in the direct scope of these proceedings by way of all of the subject matter that’s having in the past being at issue in (Arthur et al) Plaintiff vs. (Cathedral et al) Defendant(s) and most certainly in the media

25 In regards to among other things the Issues of Defendants (Arthur et al) label/calling Plaintiff among others a “Derelict” of Houston TX with the rest of Beacon clients among others ;

Which common sense dictate these facts among many others surly having been discuss in the previous action in (Arthur et al) Plaintiff vs. (Cathedral et al) Defendant(s) under direct examination of the “work product deposition” of (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) the “Professional legal piranhas” in defense of (Arthur Esq.) in the past;

And the Plaintiff is entitled to review each and all said documents, materials, evidences and namely the deposition previously conducted against (Arthur et al) in this regard.

Under the work-product doctrine, "tangible material or its intangible equivalent" that is collected or prepared in anticipation of litigation is not discoverable,

However the “work product” of another (Attorneys) work namely (Andy & Kenny IV Esq.) the “Professional legal piranhas” having been mention above;

And their combine work product(s) efforts that been prepared in defense and anticipation of the Plaintiff at the Time namely (Arthur et al vs. Christ Church Cathedral)

And his ungodly attempt to achieve among other things monetary awards of $250,000.00 of the Plaintiff “ear mark poor man money” from the “Holy Church “

Namely (Christ Church Cathedral et al) with a further commit acts and actions made by defendant (Arthur et al) of a “definite & forever” sought closure of the Plaintiffs’ “Feed-n-Wash Hole”

To include but not limited to facts of Defendants (Arthur et al) posing as the Grinch and committed to the pilferage of the Plaintiff “Christmas Holidays of 2009”

Whom (Arthur Esq.) of this present time;

Now acting as “legal counsel” for Defendant (Arthur et al) in this action …whom both being the same seeking to “fraudulently abuse” the Attorney-client privilege,

With further distortion of fact by way of fraudulent misrepresentation & flagrant claims of the “work product-doctrine” of Another Attorneys work-product(s) in regards to the discovery request made by the Plaintiff for said deposition being conducted against (Arthur Esq. / et al) in the past action (Arthur et al Plaintiff vs. Cathedral et al) Defendant(s)

* The Plaintiff respectfully refer the Honorable court to see definition below

Distortion of Fact

A representor may make a statement which prima facie is technically true; however this may tell only half the story. If a statement of fact is made but the representor fails to include information which would significantly alter the interpretation of this fact, then a misrepresentation may have occurred.

Fraudulent misrepresentation (Derry v. Peek) occurs when one makes representation with intent to deceive and with the knowledge that it is false.

A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury.

Fraud is commonly understood as dishonesty calculated for advantage. A person who is dishonest may be called a fraud. In the U.S. legal system, fraud is a specific offense with certain features.

flagrant - conspicuously and outrageously bad or reprehensible; "a crying shame"; "an egregious lie"; "flagrant violation of human rights"; "a glaring error"; "gross ineptitude"; "gross injustice"; "rank treachery"

The Plaintiff is appearing Pro Se in this action with the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al/ Esq.) enactment of a “rank treachery of a shame before the Honorable Court at the expense of the Plaintiff

In regards to distortion of facts by way of fraudulent misrepresentation & flagrant claims of the work product-product doctrine of another attorney’s work-product(s) in regards to the discovery request made by the Plaintiff for said deposition as described above to include but not limited to:

Further attempts at bully the weight of the legal law definition(s) in regards to “Derelict”, “Attorney/client”, “work-product” and “nuisances” through-out the entire civil action discovery process as the Defendants (Arthur et al) continue pattern and practices having already achieved (1) counter suit (2) media “hate mail” & exposure (no man should ever, ever, wish upon himself”) self inflicted placement of being at a state of a “unholy out cast” of some sort for crimes against human

respectful nature”. (3) Exposure for his staff of Law Office of Harry C. Arthur receiving wrongful vulgar cussing out; which should having been directed at (Arthur Esq.) by this individual person to his face by some unknown individual …for provoking such wrongful behavior …of two wrongs don’t make a right” yet Arthur started this problem in regards to defamatory and discriminatory acts and actions

To include but not limited to previously stated “above” and “below” notice facts “timely served” upon the said Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) in this action of the Plaintiff intent on acting in his best legal benefit

And gain in regards to Plaintiff entitlement of a pursuit of justice for this civil action.

Pursuant to rule 193.7 of the Texas Rules of civil Procedure, Plaintiff hereby gives notice that all documents produced by any Plaintiff or Defendant will be used at pretrial proceeding or at the Trial of this matter which Plaintiff most certainly intend on doing so in this particular cause of action.

III

Conclusion

Defendant herein continue(s) to express the desire to pilferage and “You Know the Old saying” The Attorney who Represent himself has got a fool for a client;”

Wherefore the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, for the above stated reasoning move the Honorable Court to issues an Honorable order requiring Defendant;

Harry C. Arthur (Esq.) Produce to the Plaintiff a Full, correct, certified and complete copy of the deposition as stated above

Dated this ______ Day of _________________, 2010

And Respectfully Submitted

By, ____________________________

Louis Charles Hamilton II

Pro Se Plaintiff

P. O. Box 20126

Houston Texas, 77225

Page 1 of 4

1234>

 

Thread Tools

Rating: Display Modes

01-19-2011, 03:55 PM

  #1

bl Cmdr. Bluefin Special Public Notice:

uefinlch2

Senior Member

 

Join Date: Aug 2010

Location:

2011”

To: The President of the United States of America

To: Gov. “Rick Perry”

To: Charlie Sheen & Family

To: 112 Congress

To: Sarah Palin

First to the “Bitch” the Flag is at full staff (Today), the nation has mourn, and I will be smoking (Cajun Red hot) …up your dizzy extra silly “Bitch” who like to start shit fucking Semi-Attractive in a 3:00 AM drunk dark bar Ass,…..Sarah Palin..xoxo1. You were well fucking covered in my Civil Action suit just days later …..what the Defendants (The United States of America) get’s ….lot’s of per-target murder… and it was well plan to the “Fucking (“John-Boot”) by a “Retarded Extra thick Water Head boy” waiting on a jolly pop-n-lethal injection cocktail.

Houston

Posts: 101

2. You have the (Media) looking like “Creeping Whores” fucking waiting for your throw in the “Red Extra thick Neck Towel” into the ring for …President of the Oval office ….

3. Hurry the fuck up… so I can fire up a special smoke…and laugh...”Dumb Bitch…..

4. Earth to “Sarah Palin” “Just what do you think I am going to do when I drag the Defendants (The United States of America) Ass to Federal Court”

5. “Bitch”….get the real short mini skirt, pink panties,....

The (8) color circus “Fucking Make up on” have a bowl of oat meal and have a fucking seat at the Cmdr. Bluefin “Special Video Deposition”…and if ya refuse the Federal Invitation…..”

6. Well That Mean Old (U.S.D. A.) “Honorable Texas “Hang em High” Federal Judge…will instructed my Secrete special, special, friends ….The Fighting Boys from (USMS) “United

States Marshall Services” to send one of them “Jet’s …(Cmdr. Bluefin) may in a dark crazy fucked up dream possibly in a manner of sleep walking of “some crazy nigger MI3 sorts” forfeiture for possibly them (DEA) Freak’s.

7. And Drag your Ass by the Hair….for a real “Nigger Deposition Interrogation” into just what the fucking possible (among other things) have substances for advancement of the (Negro) species…” in this life time”.

8. You might caution your silly good starting dumb shit self before (USMS) Con-Air flight and want to use a pre- laxative in light of a well needed “Extreme Nigger Interrogation” smell good too……K.......

Next………112 Congress (You Butt Holes) if you do not work with the President of the United States (ASAP), when I send you a Federal summons to the “Nigger Deposition” you might want to really consider jumping out of the (12) floor fucking window (ASAP) and on your way down slap ya mom with a 22 oz.

framing hammer

..Then rather have me Respectfully request that “Mean Old Hang em High Texas Federal Honorable Judge to slap your Scank Ass in a seat next to the (“Bitch”) on “Con Air” and come see the “Commander Bluefin” for a real “Nigger Interrogation” and you can bet your red neck hush puppy ass... I em going to hand pick the biggest prick in the 112 Congress place and “Fuck em up real nigger good too….then post ya Weak Greedy Fucked up Ass on (YouTube)…..

Next…….Charlie Sheen & Family, Dude how it is going, (Bro)…

(You Guys have done a lot for the poor of all colors, especially ya dad (Martin)…xoxoxooxx.....

Think (Cmdr. Bluefin) was just going to leave ya fucking stinking and just like hanging” .....

(Smooooooch)… Love the “4 Star Soup Kitchen” @ Santa Monica Beach CA….

way back then I fix the small leak on the roof and had some free 4 star chow, Your Crazy (Charlie Sheen) Ass came through the back alley way to your Dad’s Soup Kitchen Place back door to do you required (court order) community services…(Washing them dam dishes)…..ha, ha,.....

though I forgot ya hun…..xoxoxoox (Took a picture with ya and kept it on the work ship one day and a crooked sea weed bitch bastard rip it off”) ...

when I threw a real party at the (Reconstruction Nigger Party in DC) you and the whole family got my extended let’s party till ya drop and hurry the fuck up and puke invite…….xoxoox

P.S. and another Photo Op. please… (Da)…

Next: Gov. “Rick Perry” (Ya Good Suit Wearing

“Motherfucker”)…xoxoox..

Love the “inaugural taunt” to the Defendants (The United States of America) & you bet ya” you…“good suit wearing Republican Ass” the “Lone Star State namely (Texas) will lead the Fuck up Nation out of fucking turmoil....

…cuss…. I (Cmdr. Bluefin) fixing to extra boot the silly shit out of them straight the fuck up to see the “Mean Old Hang em High Texas U.S.D.A. Federal Honorable Judge for a real cripple crooked red neck hanging…

P.S. Gov Rick Perry while ya cutting poor nigger funds, just remember one very, very important got dam thing….ya better not fuck with the “Christ Church Cathedral” (Beacon) soup kitchen in Houston Texas (Funds)…

then your good suit wearing ass… will end up looking like (Houston Scrooge Attorney…. Harry C. Arthur et al)......

and then ya can really forget the Fucking run

for the Republican shot at “Oval Office” in DC………Da” ha, ha, xoxox”

And finally to the “President of the United States of America”

1. Sorry for the mess in Federal court (Not)…..ha, ha,

2. Very Extra Special Sweet Good Holy Job...on the Mess in Arizona”

3. Man Bro…I can hear the “First Lady” cussing you the “fuck out” all the way down here in the “Gulf Coast….

You’re the President of the “Got Dam United States of America), and you think you going to go and play “Basketball again and get your neck broke the next time instead of you’re busted up lip….

Not on my (First Lady Wife) watch, you got that Crazy 112 Congress, Sarah Fucked up Bitch Ass to deal with, bla….bla…..Big Oil…….bla bla…….Fucking National Health and Human

Services fucked up mess…….bla bla bla………..”National Budget”…….bla bla……..”Dam War”…blab la…Inadequate Mental Health Services”……bla bla….and that crazy black Cajun if ya fucking forgot filed a Dam “Nigger Civil Action” too…Crazy black fucker wants (18 Trillion Dollars)…

So ya better play some “One Hand Dam Scrabble” on “Air Force One” for fun eat a tuna sandwich…and get to “Fucking Work”….ya lazy, no good shooting 3 point any way “Presidential bloke”…..

“Well Mr. President Bro”…... you just tell the Little “First Lady” (Commander Bluefin) Got ya Back…

.you just tell her… I said…. fuck some dam “one hand scrabble” for fucking “real fun and relaxing”…

.and she knows what she really got to do……..if not”….. “Cmdr. Bluefin” is sending in the expert ….“Monica Lewinski” .......

.... “Oppppps Snapple”…..”What that mom got to go to “Sam Club” for ya and pick you up a crate of “Kotex” ........

they having a buy one crate and get one crate free sale….

.you got a dam fucking coupon…..

(Double Fucking Kotex Crate Rats)….

well time for some dial tones…..Cmdr. Bluefin going off line….xoxoxo.....

 

bluefinlch2

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by bluefinlch2

01-

  #2

20-2011, 02:06 AM

popciti

Junior Mem

do i hear fucking party Cmdr. Bluefin style....xoxoxoxo

Popciti crashing the Rizanch.....Cajun Barbeque

ber

 

Join Date: Aug 2010

Location: H

ouston

Posts: 4

 

popciti

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by popciti

01-20-2011, 09:25 AM

  #3

Cambodia

Junior Member

 

Join Date: Sep 2010

Location: Houston

Posts: 6

Sarah Louise Palin (pronounced /ˈpeɪlɨn/ ( listen); née Heath; born 2/ 11, 1964

Sarah Louise Palin (pronounced /ˈpeɪlɨn/ ( listen); née Heath; born February 11, 1964) is an American politician, author, speaker, and political news commentator who was the youngest person and the first woman elected Governor of Alaska. She served as governor from December 2006 until she resigned in 2009, rather than becoming a lame duck and continuing to defend against what she regarded as frivolous ethics complaints. Chosen by Republican Party presidential candidate John McCain in August 2008 to be his running mate in that year's presidential election,[11] she was the first Alaskan on the national ticket of a major party, as well as the first

female vice-presidential nominee of the Republican Party.

On July 3, 2009, Palin announced she would not seek re-election as governor and that she was resigning effective July 26, 2009, eighteen months before the completion of her term. She cited ethics complaints that had been filed following her selection as running mate to John McCain as one of the reasons for her resignation, saying the resulting investigations had affected her ability to govern the state.[12][13][14][15] Speculation that she will run for the Republican Party presidential nomination in 2012 began prior to the defeat of the McCain–Palin ticket in 2008.[16][17]

Before she was elected governor, she was a member of the Wasilla, Alaska City Council from 1992 to 1996, and the city's mayor from 1996 to 2002. After an unsuccessful campaign for lieutenant governor of Alaska in 2002, she chaired the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission from 2003 until she resigned in 2004.

In November 2009, her autobiography Going Rogue: An American Life was released and it quickly became a best-seller, selling more than two million copies.[18] In January 2010, Palin began providing political commentary to the Fox News Channel under a multi-year contract.[19] It was announced in March 2010 that she was to host her own TV show, called Sarah Palin's Alaska. Palin authored a second book, America by Heart, which was released on November 23, 2010.[18]

Early life and careerPalin was born in Sandpoint, Idaho, the third of four children (three daughters, one son) to Charles R. "Chuck" Heath, a science teacher and track coach, and Sarah "Sally" (née Sheeran), a school secretary. She is of English, Irish and German descent.[3] Her siblings are Chuck Jr. (born February 7, 1962), Heather (Bruce) (born January 28, 1963), and Molly (McCann) (born November 26, 1966).[20][21][22][23][24] While Palin was an infant, the family moved to Skagway, Alaska, where her father

worked as a teacher.[25] After five years, the family moved to Eagle River, but relocated to Wasilla in 1972, when she was 8 years old.[26][27] Palin played flute in the junior high band, then attended Wasilla High School where she was the head of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes,[10] and a member of the girls' basketball and cross country running teams.[28] During her senior year, she was co-captain and point guard of the basketball team that won the Alaska state championship, earning the nickname "Sarah Barracuda" for her competitive streak.[29][30][31]

In 1984, Palin won the Miss Wasilla beauty pageant.[32][33] She finished third in the Miss Alaska pageant,[34][35] playing flute in the talent portion of the contest,[36] and receiving both the Miss Congeniality award and a college scholarship.[29]

After graduating from high school, Palin enrolled at the University of Hawaii in Hilo.[37] Shortly after arriving in Hawaii, Palin switched to Hawaii Pacific University for a

semester in the fall of 1982 and then North Idaho College in the spring and fall of 1983.[38] In June 2008, the Alumni Association of North Idaho College gave her its Distinguished Alumni Achievement Award.[39] She attended the University of Idaho in the fall of 1984 and spring of 1985, and attended Matanuska-Susitna College in the fall of 1985. Palin returned to the University of Idaho in the spring of 1986, receiving her bachelor's degree in communications with an emphasis in journalism in 1987.[6][38][40][41]

After graduating, she worked as a sportscaster for KTUU-TV and KTVA-TV in Anchorage,[42][43] and as a sports reporter for the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman,[44][45] fulfilling an early ambition.[46]

On August 29, 1988, she eloped with her high school sweetheart Todd Palin; according to her later account, this was to spare her parents the expense of a "big white wedding".[47][48][49][50] After the marriage, she helped in her husband's

commercial fishing business.[51]

Early political careerMain articles: Early political career of Sarah Palin and Electoral history of Sarah PalinThroughout her tenure on the city council and the rest of her political career, Palin has remained a Republican, first registering as such in 1982.[52] Palin was elected to the Wasilla City Council in 1992 winning 530 votes to 310.[53][54] She ran for reelection in 1995, winning by 413 votes to 185.[55]

Mayor of WasillaMotivated by concerns that revenue from a new Wasilla sales tax would not be spent wisely,[48] Palin ran for mayor of Wasilla in 1996, defeating incumbent mayor John Stein[56] 651 to 440 votes.[57] Her biographer has described her campaign as targeting wasteful spending and high taxes;[29] her opponent Stein has said that Palin introduced abortion, gun rights, and term limits as campaign issues.[58] The election was nonpartisan, but the state Republican Party took the unprecedented step of running advertisements for Palin.[58]

Palin ran for re-election against Stein in 1999 and won, 909 votes to 292.[59] In 2002, she completed the second of the two consecutive three-year terms she was allowed to serve by the city charter.[60] She was elected president of the Alaska Conference of Mayors[61] in 1999.[62]

First termDuring her first year in office, Palin kept a jar with the names of Wasilla residents on her desk. Once a week, she pulled out a name, picked up the phone and asked: "How's the city doing?"[63] Using income generated by a 2% sales tax that had been approved by Wasilla voters in October 1992,[64] Palin cut property taxes by 75% and eliminated personal property and business inventory taxes.[56][65] Using municipal bonds, she made improvements to the roads and sewers, and increased funding to the Police Department.[58] She also oversaw new bike paths and procured funding for storm-water treatment to protect freshwater resources.[56] At the same time, she shrank the local museum's budget and deterred talk of a new library and city hall.

[56]

Shortly after taking office in October 1996, Palin eliminated the position of museum director[66] and asked for updated resumes and resignation letters from "city department heads who had been loyal to Stein,"[67] including the police chief, public works director, finance director, and librarian.[68] Palin stated this request was to find out their intentions and whether they supported her.[68] She temporarily required department heads to get her approval before talking to reporters, saying that they first needed to become acquainted with her administration's policies.[68] She created the position of city administrator,[58] and reduced her own $68,000 salary by 10%, although by mid-1998 this was reversed by the city council.[69]

In October 1996, Palin asked library director Mary Ellen Emmons if she would object to the removal of a book from the library if people were picketing to have the book removed.[70] Emmons responded that she

would, and others as well.[70] Palin explained that she had been trying to get to know her staff and had been discussing many issues with them "both rhetorical and realistic in nature."[70] No books were removed and no attempt was made to remove books from the library during Palin's tenure as mayor.[71]

Palin said she fired Police Chief Irl Stambaugh because he did not fully support her efforts to govern the city.[72] Stambaugh filed a lawsuit alleging wrongful termination and violation of his free speech rights.[73] The judge dismissed Stambaugh's lawsuit, holding that that the police chief served at the discretion of the mayor, and could be terminated for nearly any reason, even a political one,[74][75] and ordered Stambaugh to pay Palin's legal fees.[74]

Wasilla City HallLocation of Wasilla, AlaskaSecond termDuring her second term as mayor, Palin

proposed and promoted the construction of a municipal sports center to be financed by a 0.5%[58] sales tax increase and $14.7 million bond issue.[76] Voters approved the measure by a 20 vote margin and the Wasilla Multi-Use Sports Complex was built on time and under budget. However, the city spent an additional $1.3 million because of an eminent domain lawsuit caused by the failure to obtain clear title to the property before beginning construction.[76] The city's long-term debt grew from about $1 million to $25 million due to $15 million for the sports complex, $5.5 million for street projects, and $3 million for water improvement projects. The Wall Street Journal characterized the project as a "financial mess".[76] A city council member defended the spending increases as being caused by the city's growth during that time.[77]

Palin also joined with nearby communities in hiring the Anchorage-based lobbying firm of Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh to lobby for federal funds. The firm secured nearly $8

million in earmarks for the Wasilla city government,[78] including $500,000 for a youth shelter, $1.9 million for a transportation hub, and $900,000 for sewer repairs.[79]

In 2008, Wasilla's current mayor credited Palin's 75 percent property tax cuts and infrastructure improvements with bringing "big-box stores" and 50,000 shoppers per day to Wasilla.[53] A local gun store owner said Palin made the town "more of a community ... It's no longer a little strip town that you can blow through in a heartbeat."[53] At the conclusion of Palin's tenure as mayor in 2002, the city had about 6,300 residents.[80][clarification needed]

State-level politicsIn 2002, Palin ran for the Republican nomination for lieutenant governor, coming in second to Loren Leman in a five-way Republican primary.[81] Following her defeat, she campaigned throughout the state for the Republican governor-lieutenant governor ticket of Frank Murkowski and Loren Leman.[82] Murkowski

and Leman won, Murkowski resigned from his long-held U.S. Senate seat in December 2002 to assume the governorship. Palin was said to be on the "short list" of possible appointees to Murkowski's U.S. Senate seat,[82] but Murkowski ultimately appointed his daughter, State Representative Lisa Murkowski, as his successor in the Senate.[83]

Governor Murkowski offered a number of other jobs to Palin, and in February 2003, she accepted an appointment to the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, which oversees Alaska's oil and gas fields for safety and efficiency.[82] Although she had little background in the area, she said she wanted to learn more about the oil industry, and was named chair of the commission and ethics supervisor.[1][82][84] By November 2003 she was filing non-public ethics complaints with the state attorney general and the governor against a fellow commission member, Randy Ruedrich, a former petroleum engineer and the current chair of the state Republican

Party.[82] Palin had observed Ruedrich doing Party business on the state's time, and leaking confidential information to oil industry insiders. He was forced to resign in November 2003.[82] Palin resigned in January 2004 and put her protests against Ruedrich's "lack of ethics" into the public arena[29][82] by filing a public complaint against Ruedrich,[85] who was then fined $12,000. She also joined with Democratic legislator Eric Croft[86] in complaining that Gregg Renkes, a former Alaskan Attorney General,[87] had a financial conflict of interest in negotiating a coal exporting trade agreement.[88][89] Renkes also resigned his post.[29][84]

From 2003 to June 2005, Palin served as one of three directors of "Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.," a 527 group designed to provide political training for Republican women in Alaska.[90] In 2004, Palin told the Anchorage Daily News that she had decided not to run for the U.S. Senate that year against the Republican incumbent Lisa Murkowski because her

teenage son opposed it. Palin said, "How could I be the team mom if I was a U.S. Senator?"[91]

Governor of AlaskaMain article: Governorship of Sarah Palin

Palin visits soldiers of the Alaska National Guard, July 24, 2007.In 2006, running on a clean-government platform, Palin defeated incumbent Governor Frank Murkowski in the Republican gubernatorial primary.[92][93] Her running mate was State Senator Sean Parnell.

In the November election, Palin was outspent but victorious, defeating former Democratic governor Tony Knowles by a margin of 48.3% to 40.9%.[29] She became Alaska's first female governor, and, at the age of 42, the youngest governor in Alaskan history, the state's first governor to have been born after Alaska achieved U.S. statehood, and the first not to be inaugurated in Juneau (she chose to have the ceremony held in Fairbanks instead).

She took office on December 4, 2006, and for most of her term was very popular with Alaska voters. Polls taken in 2007 showed her with 93% and 89% popularity among all voters,[94] which led some media outlets to call her "the most popular governor in America."[86][94] A poll taken in late September 2008 after Palin was named to the national Republican ticket showed her popularity in Alaska at 68%.[95] A poll taken in May 2009 showed Palin's popularity among Alaskans was at 54% positive and 41.6% negative.[96]

Palin declared that top priorities of her administration would be resource development, education and workforce development, public health and safety, and transportation and infrastructure development. She had championed ethics reform throughout her election campaign. Her first legislative action after taking office was to push for a bipartisan ethics reform bill. She signed the resulting legislation in July 2007, calling it a "first step", and declaring that she remained determined to

clean up Alaska politics.[97]

Palin frequently broke with the state Republican establishment.[98][99] For example, she endorsed Sean Parnell's bid to unseat the state's longtime at-large U.S. Representative, Don Young,[100] and she publicly challenged then-Senator Ted Stevens to come clean about the federal investigation into his financial dealings. Shortly before his July 2008 indictment, she held a joint news conference with Stevens, described by The Washington Post as intended to "make clear she had not abandoned him politically."[90]

Palin promoted oil and natural gas resource development in Alaska, including drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). Proposals to drill for oil in ANWR have been the subject of a national debate.[101]

In 2006, Palin obtained a passport[102] and in 2007 traveled for the first time outside of North America on a trip to Kuwait. There she visited the Khabari Alawazem Crossing at

the Kuwait–Iraq border and met with members of the Alaska National Guard at several bases.[103] On her return trip, she visited injured soldiers in Germany.[104]

Budget, spending, and federal funds Palin in Germany, July 2007In June 2007, Palin signed a record $6.6 billion operating budget into law.[105] At the same time, she used her veto power to make the second-largest cuts of the construction budget in state history. The $237 million in cuts represented over 300 local projects, and reduced the construction budget to $1.6 billion.[106]

In 2008, Palin vetoed $286 million, cutting or reducing funding for 350 projects from the FY09 capital budget.[107]

Palin followed through on a campaign promise to sell the Westwind II jet, a purchase made by the Murkowski administration for $2.7 million in 2005 against the wishes of the legislature.[108] In August 2007, the jet was listed on eBay, but

the sale fell through, and the plane was later sold for $2.1 million through a private brokerage firm.[109]

Gubernatorial expendituresPalin lived in Juneau during the legislative session and lived in Wasilla and worked out of offices in Anchorage the rest of the year. Since the office in Anchorage is 565 miles from Juneau, while she worked there, state officials said she was permitted to claim a $58 per diem travel allowance, which she took (a total of $16,951), and to reimbursement for hotels, which she did not, choosing instead to drive about 50 miles to her home in Wasilla.[110] She also chose not to use the former governor's private chef.[111] Republicans and Democrats have criticized Palin for taking the per diem and $43,490 in travel expenses for the times her family accompanied her on state business.[112][113] In response, Palin's staffers said that these practices were in line with state policy, that her gubernatorial expenses are 80% below those of her predecessor, Frank

Murkowski,[112] and that "many of the hundreds of invitations Palin receives include requests for her to bring her family, placing the definition of 'state business' with the party extending the invitation."[110] In February 2009, the State of Alaska, reversing a policy that had treated the payments as legitimate business expenses under the Internal Revenue Code, decided that per diems paid to state employees for stays in their own homes will be treated as taxable income and will be included in employees' gross income on their W-2 forms.[114] Palin herself had ordered the review of the tax policy.[115]

In December 2008, an Alaska state commission recommended increasing the Governor's annual salary from $125,000 to $150,000. Palin stated that she would not accept the pay raise.[116] In response, the commission dropped the recommendation.[117]

Federal fundingIn her State of the State address on January 17, 2008, Palin declared

that the people of Alaska "can and must continue to develop our economy, because we cannot and must not rely so heavily on federal government [funding]."[118] Alaska's federal congressional representatives cut back on pork-barrel project requests during Palin's time as governor; despite this, in 2008 Alaska was still the largest per-capita recipient of federal earmarks, requesting nearly $750 million in special federal spending over a period of two years.[119]

While there is no sales tax or income tax in Alaska, state revenues doubled to $10 billion in 2008. For the 2009 budget, Palin gave a list of 31 proposed federal earmarks or requests for funding, totaling $197 million, to Alaska Senator Ted Stevens.[120][121] Palin has stated that her decreasing support for federal funding was a source of friction between her and the state's congressional delegation; Palin requested less in federal funding each year than her predecessor Frank Murkowski requested in his last year.[122]

Bridge to NowhereMain article: Gravina Island BridgeIn 2005, before Palin was elected governor, Congress passed a $442-million earmark for constructing two Alaska bridges as part of an omnibus spending bill. The Gravina Island Bridge received nationwide attention as a symbol of pork-barrel spending, following news reports that the bridge would cost $233 million in Federal funds. Because Gravina Island, the site of the Ketchikan airport, has a population of 50, the bridge became known nationally as the "Bridge to Nowhere". Following an outcry by the public and some members of the U.S. Senate, Congress eliminated the bridge earmark from the spending bill but gave the allotted funds to Alaska as part of its general transportation fund.[123]

Palin holds up a t-shirt reading "Nowhere Alaska 99901" while visiting Ketchikan during her Gubernatorial campaign in 2006; the ZIP code for the area is 99901.In 2006,

Palin ran for governor with a "build-the-bridge" plank in her platform,[124] saying she would "not allow the spinmeisters to turn this project ... into something that's so negative."[125] Palin criticized the use of the word "nowhere" as insulting to local residents[124][126] and urged speedy work on building the infrastructure "while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist."[126]

As governor, Palin canceled the Gravina Island Bridge in September 2007, saying that Congress had "little interest in spending any more money" due to what she called "inaccurate portrayals of the projects."[127] Alaska chose not to return the $442 million in federal transportation funds.[128]

In 2008, as a vice-presidential candidate, Palin characterized her position as having told Congress "thanks, but no thanks, on that bridge to nowhere." This angered some Alaskans in Ketchikan, who said that the claim was false and a betrayal of Palin's previous support for their community.[128]

Some critics complained that this statement was misleading, since she had expressed support for the spending project and kept the Federal money after the project was canceled.[129] Palin was also criticized for allowing construction of a 3-mile access road, built with $25 million in Federal transportation funds set aside as part of the original bridge project, to continue. A spokesman for Alaska's Department of Transportation made a statement that it was within Palin's power to cancel the road project, but also noted that the state was still considering cheaper designs to complete the bridge project, and that in any case, the road would open up the surrounding lands for development.[130][131]

Gas pipelineSee also: Alaska gas pipelineIn August 2008, Palin signed a bill authorizing the State of Alaska to award TransCanada Pipelines — the sole bidder to meet the state's requirements — a license to build and operate a pipeline to transport natural gas from the North Slope to the

Continental United States through Canada.[132] The governor also pledged $500 million in seed money to support the project.[133] It is estimated that the project will cost $26 billion.[132] Newsweek described the project as "the principal achievement of Sarah Palin's term as Alaska's governor."[134] The pipeline faces legal challenges from Canadian First Nations.[134]

Predator controlSee also: Governorship of Sarah Palin#EnvironmentIn 2007, Palin supported a 2003 Alaska Department of Fish and Game policy allowing the hunting of wolves from the air as part of a predator control program intended to increase moose and caribou populations for subsistence-food gatherers and other hunters.[135][136] In March 2007, Palin's office announced that a bounty of $150 per wolf would be paid to the 180 volunteer pilots and gunners, to offset fuel costs, in five areas of Alaska. 607 wolves had been killed in the prior four years. State biologists wanted 382 to 664 wolves to be

killed by the end of the predator-control season in April 2007. Wildlife activists sued the state, and a state judge declared the bounty illegal on the basis that a bounty would have to be offered by the Board of Game and not by the Department of Fish and Game.[135][137]

Public Safety Commissioner dismissalMain article: Alaska Public Safety Commissioner dismissalPalin dismissed Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan on July 11, 2008, citing performance-related issues, such as not being "a team player on budgeting issues"[138] and "egregious rogue behavior."[139] Palin attorney Thomas Van Flein said that the "last straw" was Monegan's planned trip to Washington, D.C., to seek funding for a new, multimillion-dollar sexual assault initiative the governor hadn't yet approved.[140] Monegan said that he had resisted persistent pressure from Palin, her husband, and her staff, including State Attorney General Talis J. Colberg, to fire Palin’s ex-brother-in-law, Alaska State

Trooper Mike Wooten; Wooten was involved in a child custody battle with Palin’s sister after a bitter divorce that included an alleged death threat against Palin's father.[141][142] At one point Sarah and Todd Palin hired a private investigator to gather information, seeking to have Wooten officially disciplined.[143] Monegan stated that he learned an internal investigation had found all but two of the allegations to be unsubstantiated, and Wooten had been disciplined for the others — an illegal moose killing and the tasering of his 11-year-old stepson (the child 'reportedly' asked to be tasered).[142] He told the Palins that there was nothing he could do because the matter was closed.[144] When contacted by the press for comment, Monegan first acknowledged pressure to fire Wooten but said that he could not be certain that his own firing was connected to that issue;[142] he later asserted that the dispute over Wooten was a major reason for his firing.[145] Palin stated on July 17 that Monegan was not pressured to fire Wooten, nor dismissed for not doing so.[138][144]

Monegan said the subject of Wooten came up when he invited Palin to a birthday party for his cousin, state senator Lyman Hoffman, in February 2007 during the legislative session in Juneau. "As we were walking down the stairs in the capitol building she wanted to talk to me about her former brother-in-law," Monegan said. "I said, 'Ma'am, I need to keep you at arm's length with this. I can't deal about him with you.[146] She said, 'OK, that's a good idea.'"[142]

Palin said there was "absolutely no pressure ever put on Commissioner Monegan to hire or fire anybody, at any time. I did not abuse my office powers. And I don't know how to be more blunt and candid and honest, but to tell you that truth. To tell you that no pressure was ever put on anybody to fire anybody." "Never putting any pressure on him," added Todd Palin.[147]

On August 13 she acknowledged that a half dozen members of her administration had

made more than two dozen calls on the matter to various state officials. "I do now have to tell Alaskans that such pressure could have been perceived to exist, although I have only now become aware of it," she said.[144][146][148] Palin said, "Many of these inquiries were completely appropriate. However, the serial nature of the contacts could be perceived as some kind of pressure, presumably at my direction."[138][149]

Chuck Kopp, whom Palin had appointed to replace Monegan as public safety commissioner, received a $10,000 state severance package after he resigned following just two weeks on the job. Kopp, the former Kenai chief of police, resigned July 25 following disclosure of a 2005 sexual harassment complaint and letter of reprimand against him. Monegan said that he didn't get any severance package from the state.[138]

Legislative investigationOn August 1, 2008 the Alaska Legislature hired an investigator,

Stephen Branchflower, to review the Monegan dismissal. Legislators stated that Palin had the legal authority to fire Monegan, but they wanted to know whether her action had been motivated by anger at Monegan for not firing Wooten.[150][151] The atmosphere was bipartisan and Palin pledged to cooperate.[150][151][152] Wooten remained employed as a state trooper.[143] She placed an aide on paid leave due to a tape-recorded phone conversation that she deemed improper, in which the aide, appearing to act on her behalf, complained to a trooper that Wooten had not been fired.[153]

Several weeks after the start of what the media referred to as "troopergate", Palin was chosen as John McCain's running mate.[151] On September 1, Palin asked the legislature to drop its investigation, saying that the state Personnel Board had jurisdiction over ethics issues.[154] The Personnel Board's three members were first appointed by Palin’s predecessor, and Palin reappointed one member in 2008.[155] On

September 19, Todd Palin and several state employees refused to honor subpoenas, the validity of which were disputed by Talis Colberg, Palin's appointee as Alaska's Attorney General.[156] On October 2, a court rejected Colberg's challenge to the subpoenas,[157] and seven of the witnesses, not including Todd Palin, eventually testified.[158]

Branchflower ReportOn October 10, 2008, the Alaska Legislative Council unanimously voted to release, without endorsing,[159] the Branchflower Report, in which investigator Stephen Branchflower found that firing Monegan "was a proper and lawful exercise of her constitutional and statutory authority," but that Palin abused her power as governor and violated the state's Executive Branch Ethics Act when her office pressured Monegan to fire Wooten.[160] The report stated that "Governor Palin knowingly permitted a situation to continue where impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates to advance a personal agenda,

to wit: to get Trooper Michael Wooten fired."[161] The report also said that Palin "permitted Todd Palin to use the Governor's office [...] to continue to contact subordinate state employees in an effort to find some way to get Trooper Wooten fired."[161][162]

On October 11, Palin's attorneys responded, condemning the Branchflower Report as "misleading and wrong on the law."[163] One of Palin's attorneys, Thomas Van Flein, said that it was an attempt to "smear the governor by innuendo."[164] Later that day, Palin did a conference call interview with various Alaskan reporters, where she stated, "Well, I’m very, very pleased to be cleared of any legal wrongdoing... Any hint of any kind of unethical activity there. Very pleased to be cleared of any of that."[165]

Alaska Personnel Board investigation and reportThe bipartisan State of Alaska Personnel Board reviewed the matter at Palin's own request.[166] On September 15, the Anchorage law firm of Clapp, Peterson, Van Flein, Tiemessen & Thorsness filed

arguments of "no probable cause" with the Personnel Board on behalf of Palin.[167][168] The Personnel Board retained independent counsel Timothy Petumenos, a Democrat, as an investigator. On October 24, Palin gave three hours of depositions with the Personnel Board in St. Louis, Missouri.[169] On November 3, 2008, the State of Alaska Personnel Board reported that there was no probable cause to believe Palin or any other state official had violated state ethical standards.[170][171][172][173][174] The report further stated that the Branchflower Report used the wrong statute in reaching its conclusions, misconstrued the available evidence and did not consider or obtain all of the material evidence required to properly reach findings in the matter.[170]

Job approval ratings, with comparisonsAs governor of Alaska, Palin's job approval rating ranged from a high of 93% in May 2007 to 54% in May 2009. In November 2006, the month before Palin took office, Alaska Governor Frank Murkowski’s job

approval rating was 19%.[175]

Date Approval Disapproval Pollster May 15, 2007[176] 93% Not reported Dittman Research May 30, 2007[177] 89% Not reported Ivan Moore Research October 19–21, 2007[178] 83% 11% Ivan Moore Research April 10, 2008[179] 73% 7% Rasmussen Reports May 17, 2008[180] 69% 9% Rasmussen Reports July 24–25, 2008[181] 80% Not reported Hays Research Group July 30, 2008[181] 64% 14% Rasmussen Reports September 20–22, 2008[182] 68% Not reported Ivan Moore Research October 7, 2008[183] 63% 37% Rasmussen Reports March 24–25, 2009[184] 59.8% 34.9% Hays Research May 4–5, 2009[184] 54% 41.6% Hays Research June 14–18, 2009[185] 56% 35% Global

Strategy Group

In April 2009, SurveyUSA reported job approval ratings for the following U.S. governors: Bob Riley (AL) 54%, Arnold Schwarzenegger (CA) 25%, Chet Culver (IA) 42%, Kathleen Sebelius (KS) 46%, Steve Beshear (KY) 47%, Tim Pawlenty (MN) 46%, Jay Nixon (MO) 56%, Bill Richardson (NM) 46%, David Paterson (NY) 25%, Ted Kulongoski (OR) 40%, Tim Kaine (VA) 50%, Christine Gregoire (WA) 40%, and Jim Doyle (WI) 35%. (Polls taken April 24 – 26, 2009).[186]

ResignationMain article: Resignation of Sarah Palin

An estimated 5,000 people[187] gathered at Pioneer Park in Fairbanks to watch Palin cede her office to Sean Parnell.On July 3, 2009, Palin announced that she would not run for re-election in the 2010 Alaska gubernatorial election and would resign before the end of July. In her announcement,[188] Palin stated that both she and the

state had been expending an "insane" amount of time and money ($2.5 million)[189] to address "frivolous" ethics complaints filed against her,[189][190][191][188] and that her decision not to seek reelection would make her a lame duck governor.[188] A Palin aide said Palin was "no longer able to do the job she had been elected to do. Essentially, the taxpayers were paying for Sarah to go to work every day and defend herself."[192] Palin and her husband Todd had personally incurred more than $500,000 in legal fees defending against ethics charges brought against her as governor.[189] Palin transferred the office of governor to Sean Parnell in Fairbanks on July 26, 2009.[193]

2008 vice-presidential campaignMain article: John McCain presidential campaign, 2008See also: Republican Party (United States) vice presidential candidates, 2008

Palin addresses the 2008 Republican National Convention in Saint Paul,

MinnesotaSeveral conservative commentators met Palin in the summer of 2007.[194] Some of them, such as Bill Kristol, later urged McCain to pick Palin as his vice presidential running mate, arguing that her presence on the ticket would provide a boost in enthusiasm among the Religious Right wing of the Republican party, while her status as an unknown on the national scene would also be a positive factor.[195]

On August 24, 2008 during a general strategy meeting, Steve Schmidt and a few other senior advisers to the McCain Campaign, discussed potential vice presidential picks with the consensus settling around Palin. The following day, the strategists advised McCain of their conclusions and he personally called Palin who was at the Alaska State Fair.[196]

On August 27, she visited McCain's vacation home near Sedona, Arizona, where she was offered the position of vice-presidential candidate.[197] According to Jill Hazelbaker,

a spokeswoman for McCain, he had previously met Palin at the National Governors Association meeting in Washington in February 2008 and had come away "extraordinarily impressed."[198] Palin was the only prospective running mate who had a face-to-face interview with McCain to discuss joining the ticket that week.[199] Nonetheless, Palin's selection was a surprise to many as speculation had centered on other candidates, such as Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, and former Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge.[200] On August 29, in Dayton, Ohio, McCain announced that he had chosen Palin as his running mate.[200]

Palin is the first Alaskan and the second woman to run on a major U.S. party ticket.[200]

Since Palin was largely unknown outside Alaska before her selection by McCain, her

personal life, policy positions, and political record drew intense media scrutiny.[201] On September 1, 2008, Palin announced that her daughter Bristol was pregnant and that she would marry the father, Levi Johnston.[202] During this period, some Republicans felt that Palin was being unfairly attacked by the media.[203] Timothy Noah of Slate magazine predicted that Palin's acceptance speech would be "wildly overpraised" and might end speculation that she was unqualified for the job of vice president because the press had been beating her up for "various trivial shortcomings" and had lowered the expectations for her speech.[204] On September 3, 2008, Palin delivered a 40-minute acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention that was well-received and watched by more than 40 million people.[205] A Rasmussen poll taken immediately after the Convention found that 51% of Americans believed that the media was "trying to hurt" Palin with negative coverage, and 40% believed Palin to be ready for the Presidency.[206]

The Palins and McCains in Fairfax, Virginia, September 2008.During the campaign, controversy erupted over alleged differences between Palin's positions as a gubernatorial candidate and her position as a vice-presidential candidate. After McCain announced Palin as his running mate, Newsweek and Time put Palin on their magazine covers,[207] as some of the media alleged that McCain's campaign was restricting press access to Palin by allowing only three one-on-one interviews and no press conferences with her.[208] Palin's first major interview, with Charles Gibson of ABC News, met with mixed reviews.[209] Her interview five days later with Fox News' Sean Hannity went more smoothly and focused on many of the same questions from Gibson's interview.[210] Palin's performance in her third interview, with Katie Couric of CBS News, was widely criticized; her poll numbers declined, Republicans expressed concern that she was becoming a political liability, and some

conservative commentators called for Palin to resign from the Presidential ticket.[211][212] Other conservatives remained ardent in their support for Palin, accusing the columnists of elitism.[213] Following this interview, some Republicans, including Mitt Romney and Bill Kristol, questioned the McCain campaign's strategy of sheltering Palin from unscripted encounters with the press.[214]

Palin reportedly prepared intensively for the October 2 vice-presidential debate with Democratic vice-presidential nominee Joe Biden at Washington University in St. Louis. Some Republicans suggested that Palin's performance in the interviews would improve public perceptions of her debate performance by lowering expectations.[211][215][216] Polling from CNN, Fox and CBS found that while Palin exceeded most voters' expectations, they felt that Biden had won the debate.[217][218]

Upon returning to the campaign trail after her debate preparation, Palin stepped up

her attacks on the Democratic candidate for President, Illinois Senator Barack Obama. At a fundraising event, Palin explained her new aggressiveness, saying, "There does come a time when you have to take the gloves off and that time is right now."[219]

Palin appeared on Saturday Night Live's "Weekend Update" segment on October 18. Prior to her appearance, she had been parodied several times by Tina Fey, who was noted for her physical resemblance to the candidate.[220] In the weeks leading up to the election, Palin was also the subject of amateur parodies posted on YouTube.[221]

Controversy arose after it was reported that the Republican National Committee (RNC) spent $150,000 of campaign contributions on clothing, hair styling, and makeup for Palin and her family in September 2008. Campaign spokespersons stated the clothing would be going to charity after the election.[222] Palin and some media outlets blamed gender bias for the controversy.[223][224] At the end of the campaign, Palin

returned the clothes to the RNC.[225]

The election took place on November 4, and Obama was projected as the winner at 11:00 PM EST.[226] In his concession speech McCain thanked Palin, calling her "one of the best campaigners I've ever seen, and an impressive new voice in our party for reform and the principles that have always been our greatest strength."[226] While aides were preparing the teleprompter for McCain's speech, they found a concession speech written for Palin by George W. Bush speechwriter Matthew Scully. Two members of McCain's staff, Steve Schmidt and Mark Salter, told Palin that there was no tradition of Election Night speeches by running mates, and that she would not be speaking. Palin appealed to McCain, who agreed with his staff.[227]

After the 2008 election Rallying with Saxby Chambliss in Savannah, Georgia, December 2008Palin was the first guest on commentator Glenn Beck's Fox News television show on January 19, 2009,

commenting on Barack Obama that he would be her president and that she would assist in any way to bring progress to the nation without abandoning her conservative views.[228]

On January 27, 2009, Palin formed the political action committee, SarahPAC.[229] The organization, which describes itself as an advocate of energy independence,[230] supports candidates for federal and state office.[231] Following her resignation as Governor, Palin announced her intention to campaign "on behalf of candidates who believe in the right things, regardless of their party label or affiliation."[232] It was reported that SarahPAC had raised nearly $1,000,000.[233] A legal defense fund was set up to help Palin challenge ethics complaints, and it had collected approximately $250,000 by mid-July 2009.[233][234] In June 2010, Palin's defense fund was ruled illegal and will have to pay back $386,856 it collected in donations because it used Palin's position as governor to raise money for her personal gain. Palin

subsequently set up a new defense fund.[235]

In March 2010, Palin started a show to be aired on TLC called Sarah Palin's Alaska.[236] The show was produced by Mark Bennett.[237] Palin also has secured a segment on Fox News.[237] Two guests that she was shown to have interviewed claimed to have never met her. Guests LL Cool J and Toby Keith stated that footage shown on the segment was actually taken from another interview with someone else, but was used in Palin's segment.[238]

On December 8, 2010, it was reported that SarahPAC and Palin's personal credit card information were compromised through cyber attacks. Palin's team believed the attack was executed by Anonymous during Operation Payback.[239] The report was met with skepticism in the blogosphere.[240] Palin's email had been hacked once before in 2008.[241]

Going Rogue and America by HeartMain

article: Going Rogue: An American LifeIn November 2009, Palin released her memoir, Going Rogue: An American Life, in which she details her private and political career, including her resignation as Governor of Alaska. Palin said she took the title from the phrase 'gone rogue' used by McCain staffers to describe her behavior when she spoke her mind on the issues during the campaign.[242] The subtitle, "An American Life", mirrors the title of President Ronald Reagan's 1990 autobiography.[243] Less than two weeks after its release, sales of the book exceeded the one million mark, with 300,000 copies sold the first day. Its bestseller rankings were comparable to memoirs by Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.[244][245][246]

Palin traveled to 11 states in a bus, with her family accompanying her, to promote the book. She made a number of media appearances as well, including a widely publicized interview on November 16, 2009 with Oprah Winfrey.[247] In November 2010 HarperCollins released Palin's second book,

titled America by Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag.[18][248][249] The book contains excerpts from Palin's favorite speeches, sermons and literature as well as portraits of people Palin admires, including some she met in rural America on her first book tour.[18]

Palin on the campaign trail in 2008Tea Party MovementOn February 6, 2010, Palin appeared as the keynote speaker at the inaugural Tea Party convention in Nashville, Tennessee. Palin said the Tea Party movement is "the future of politics in America."[250] She criticized Obama for rising deficits, and for "apologizing for America” in speeches in other countries. Palin said Obama was weak on the war on terror for allowing the so-called Christmas bomber to board a plane headed for the United States.[251] Palin’s speaking fee was reported to be $100,000, which some in the Tea Party movement criticized as being too high for fiscal conservatives to pay.[citation needed] Judson Phillips, the founder of Tea

Party Nation, the social networking site that sponsored the convention, did not confirm the amount paid to Palin saying he was contractually obligated not to speak about it.

"Pink Elephant" Movement and 2010 endorsementsIn the middle of 2010, Palin flagged the launch of a new "Pink Elephant Movement."[252] She set about endorsing a number of female GOP candidates.[253] Her endorsement helped Georgia Gubernatorial candidate Karen Handel to take the lead in the campaign for the Republican nomination,[254] though ultimately Handel lost the primary. Palin has endorsed several female candidates nationally. Ryan Rudominer, a spokesman for the House Democratic campaign operation has called her involvement in various U.S. House campaigns a "great thing across the board".[255] She spoke at a May 2010 fundraiser for the Susan B. Anthony List, a pro-life political advocacy group and political action committee that supports pro-life women in politics, in which she coined the term

"mama grizzly".[256][257]

In the months ahead of the November 2010 elections, Palin selectively endorsed Republican candidates, and was a significant fundraising asset to those she campaigned for during the primary season.[258] According to Politico, Palin's criteria for endorsing candidates was whether they had the support of the Tea Party movement and the support of the Susan B. Anthony List.[259] In terms of success, Palin was 7-2 for Senate endorsements; 7-6 for House endorsements; and 6-3 in endorsements of gubernatorial candidates[260] Palin's endorsement of Joe Miller in the August 24 Alaska primary election for U.S. Senator was identified as a possible pivotal moment in Miller's upset of the incumbent Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski.[261][262] According to Daily Beast reporter Shushannah Walshe, Christine O'Donnell's prospects of upsetting establishment Republican candidate Mike Castle "changed overnight" due to Palin's endorsement. O'Donnell defeated Castle in the September

14 primary for Joe Biden's former Senate seat in Delaware.[263] Her O'Donnell endorsement further increased tensions between Palin and the Republican establishment: leading conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer described the endorsement as "reckless and irresponsible";[264] party strategist Karl Rove argued that her endorsement may have cost the GOP the Delaware Senate seat;[265] and commentators including Politico's Ben Smith posited that Palin's support of O'Donnell contributed to dashing Republican hopes of regaining control of the U.S. Senate.[266] Palin's influence over the primaries nonetheless further increased speculation that she would seek to be the party's nominee for President in 2012,[267] with political pundits Paul Mirengoff, David Frum, and Jonathan Chait identifying Palin as the front-runner.[268][269][270]

Possible 2012 presidential campaignPalin's high profile in the 2008 presidential campaign fueled speculation that she will run for the Republican presidential

nomination in 2012, and beginning in November 2008, there was an active "Draft Palin" movement.[271] On February 6, 2010, when Fox News asked her if she would be running for president in 2012, she replied, "I would be willing to if I believe that it's right for the country."[272] She added, "I won't close the door that perhaps could be open for me in the future."[273]

In November 2010, Palin confirmed that she was considering running for the Presidency, and was "having that discussion with my family". She stated she realised her level of experience could cause problems with winning the nomination, and criticized the "lamestream media" for focusing attention on her personal life.[274]

Personal life Palin family members at the announcement of her vice-presidential selection, August 29, 2008. From left to right: Todd, Piper, Willow, Bristol and Trig.Palin describes herself as a "hockey mom". The Palins have five children: sons Track (b. 1989)[50] and Trig

Paxson Van (b. 2008), and daughters Bristol Sheeran Marie[275] (b. 1990), Willow (b. 1994), and Piper (b. 2001).[4][276] Track enlisted in the U.S. Army on September 11, 2007,[277] and was subsequently assigned to an infantry brigade. He and his unit deployed to Iraq in September 2008 for 12 months.[278] Palin's youngest child, Trig, was prenatally diagnosed with Down syndrome.[279] Palin has one grandchild, a boy named Tripp Easton Mitchell Johnston, who was born to her eldest daughter Bristol, in 2008.[280] Her husband Todd worked for the British oil company BP as an oil-field production operator, retiring in 2009, and owns a commercial fishing business.[48][281]

Palin was born into a Roman Catholic family.[9] Later, her family joined the Wasilla Assembly of God, a Pentecostal church,[282] which she attended until 2002. Palin then switched to the Wasilla Bible Church because, she said, she preferred the children's ministries offered there.[283] When in Juneau, she attends the Juneau

Christian Center.[284] Palin described herself in an interview as a "Bible-believing Christian."[9] After the Republican National Convention, a spokesperson for the McCain campaign told CNN that Palin "doesn't consider herself Pentecostal" and has "deep religious convictions."[285]

Political positionsMain article: Political positions of Sarah PalinPalin has been a registered Republican since 1982.[286]Palin opposed the 2010 health care reform package, saying it would lead to rationing of health care by a bureaucracy, which she described using the term "death panels". This legislation is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as modified by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.[287] Palin characterizes the act as an "unfunded mandate", and supports defunding it.[288] Palin supports repeal of portions of the act.[289]Palin is a strong supporter of Israel.[290][291] Referring to Iran's threat to Israel, Palin said Obama would be reelected if "he

played the war card. Say he decided to declare war on Iran or decided really come out and do whatever he could to support Israel, which I would like him to do."[292]Palin opposes same-sex marriage,[293] abortion including in cases of rape and incest, and embryonic stem cell research.[294] She supports capital punishment,[295] and parental consent for female minors seeking an abortion,[296] and supports creationism being taught as an option in public schools.[297]Palin supports sex education in public schools that encourage abstinence along with contraception.[298]A Life Member of the National Rifle Association (NRA), Palin interprets the Second Amendment as including the right to handgun possession, and opposes bans on semi-automatic assault weapons.[299] and supports gun safety education for youth.[300]Palin supports off-shore drilling, and land-based drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.[101][301] When commenting on the Gulf Coast oil disaster Palin said, "I

repeat the slogan 'drill here, drill now.'"[302] She said, "I want our country to be able to trust the oil industry."[303] Palin asked supporters to read an article by Thomas Sowell which criticized Obama for having BP pay to an escrow fund.[304]Palin has expressed skepticism about the causes of global warming,[305] but agrees that "man's activities certainly can be contributing to the issue" and that action should be taken.[306] She is opposed to cap-and-trade proposals, such as the American Clean Energy and Security Act, a bill still pending in the Senate.[307] Palin has acknowledged that "Simply waiting for low-carbon-emitting renewable capacity to be large enough will mean that it will be too late to meet the mitigation goals..that will be required [for carbon dioxide] under most credible climate-change models."[308]On foreign policy, Palin supported the Bush Administration's policies in Iraq, but is concerned that "dependence on foreign energy" may be obstructing efforts to "have an exit plan in place".[309][310] Palin supports preemptive military action in the

face of an imminent threat, and supports U.S. military operations in Pakistan. Palin supports NATO membership for Ukraine and Georgia,[311] and affirms that if Russia invaded a NATO member, the United States should meet its treaty obligations.[312]On foreign policy, Palin supported the surge strategy in Iraq, the use of additional ground forces in Afghanistan, and, in general, maintaining a strong defensive posture by increasing the defense budget. She believes Islam and democracy can co-exist. She supports strengthening America's alliance with Japan. She supports the de-nuclearization of North Korea. She supports free trade and wants to work with China to reduce American debt and improve the human rights and political freedom of its citizens.[313]Public imageMain article: Public image of Sarah PalinPrior to the Republican National Convention, a Gallup poll found that most voters were unfamiliar with Sarah Palin. During her campaign to become vice president, 39% said Palin was ready to serve as president if

needed, 33% said Palin was not, and 29% had no opinion. This was "the lowest vote of confidence in a running mate since the elder George Bush chose then-Indiana senator Dan Quayle to join his ticket in 1988."[314] Following the Convention, her image came under close media scrutiny,[201][315] particularly with regard to her religious perspective on public life, her socially conservative views, and her perceived lack of experience. Palin's experience in foreign and domestic politics came under criticism among conservatives as well as liberals following her nomination.[316][317][318][319] At the same time, Palin became more popular than John McCain among Republicans.[206]

One month after McCain announced Palin as his running mate, she was viewed both more favorably and unfavorably among voters than her opponent, Delaware Senator Joe Biden.[320] A plurality of the television audience rated Biden's performance higher at the 2008 vice-presidential debate.[320][321] Media outlets repeated Palin's

statement that she "stood up to Big Oil" when she resigned after 11 months as the head of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, due to abuses she witnessed involving other Republican commissioners and their ties to energy companies and energy lobbyists, and again when she raised taxes on oil companies as governor.[181][322] In turn, others have said that Palin is a "friend of Big Oil" due to her advocacy of oil exploration and development including drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the de-listing of the polar bear as an endangered species.[181][322] The National Organization for Women did not endorse McCain/Palin, instead endorsing Barack Obama.[316][323]

Palin was selected as one of America’s "Top 10 Most Fascinating People" of 2008 for a Barbara Walters ABC special on December 4, 2008.[324] In April 2010, Sarah Palin was selected as one of the 100 World's Most Influential People by TIME Magazine.

In the wake of the January 8th, 2011

shooting of Rep. Giffords, Palin faced criticism for her SarahPAC website's inclusion of a graphic that included a crosshair over Giffords's district. Palin responded to the criticism of the graphic, saying that "Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own. They begin and end with the criminals who commit them," controversially equating the accusations of her role in the shooting to a "blood libel".

Following her response, an ABC News-Washington Post poll found that 46% of respondents viewed Palin's actions after the shooting unfavorably, while 30% approved and 24% had no opinion.

 

Cambodia

View Public Profile

Find More

Posts by Cambodia

01-20-2011, 09:48 AM

  #4

pooh bear

Junior Member

 

Join Date: Sep 2010

Location: Houston

“Breezy Bluefin” Refreshing as the Tropical Trade winds”...xoxoox

(Breezy Bluefin)

1 ½ oz. “White Rum”

3 oz. Guava Juice/Nectar

3oz. Pineapple

3oz. Orange Juice

1 ½ oz. “Dark Rum”

1/3 oz. or splash of “Gin”

Posts: 7 Fill a “Hurricane glass with Ice.

Add “White Rum” and the Juices to a Shaker with Ice plus add the 1/3 oz. or splash of “Gin” into the Glass.

Shake well contents in the Shaker, strain into the “Hurricane glass.

Garnish with a Pineapple…………………..xoxoox......

 

pooh bear

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by pooh

bear

01-20-2011, 01:01 PM

  #5

reflect

Junior Member

 

Join Date: Sep 2010

Location: houston

Posts: 5

Smoked King Crab Legs and Lobster Tails".........xoxoox

Ingredients

Apple or alder wood chunks

1 cup butter or margarine, melted1/4 cup fresh lemon juice1 tablespoon minced fresh parsley1/2 teaspoon grated lemon rindPinch salt5 pounds frozen king crab legs, thawed4 frozen lobster tails, thawed (about 2 pounds)

Preparation

Soak wood chunks in water to cover at

least 30 minutes.

Prepare charcoal fire in smoker; let burn 15 to 20 minutes. Drain chips, and place on coals. Place water pan in smoker; add water to fill line.

Stir together butter and next 4 ingredients. Divide lemon-butter mixture in half. Crack crab legs, and split lobster tails. Brush lobster and crab with half of mixture; set aside remaining mixture.

Coat rack with cooking spray; place in smoker. Arrange crab legs and lobster tails on rack; cover with grill lid. Smoke crab about 20 minutes and lobster about 45 minutes to 1 hour or until flesh is white and firm.......

 

reflect

View Public

Profile

Find More Posts by reflect

01-24-2011, 03:15 PM

  #6

bluefinlch2

Senior Member

 

Join Date: Aug 2010

Smoking Hot of the Press 2011 Cmdr. Bluefin up date>....xoxox"

Cmdr. Bluefin

I Have to began my 2011 “Fucked up State of the Union Address up-date”...

By calling out a station for the “Hell of it” Identification Break” ...

Location: Houston

Posts: 101

And Help pay some (Mother Fucking)…Got dam it” Backpage.com piling the fuck up bills around here “....

And maybe get a volume on this “Motherfucking cheap ass “wire” broke dick thingy” ……………….

You’re on the backpage.com “Legal Forum”….&… “Live” with Louis Charles Hamilton II (Cmdr. Bluefin)….

Folks….Please don’t be too afraid of what you may “see, hear or read”……………..xoxoxox!

(Just Fucking Run)….. ha, ha,…….

or not….It’s your own Bleeding Ear’s....

The Grand Tour…!

Includes “Fresh -n-Legal” “Court Room Drama updates…

Numerous “Sherlock Holmes Stories”

and Live Mysteries special famous “Fuck heads” crash in guests’ appearance being posted as they slit their very own Greedy fucking throats….

All being solved in a very professional “Sherlock Holmes” big top- scary explosive show....

Bring a whole different perspective in a proper “New Media Broadcast”...

……full of Cmdr. Bluefin Special Hot Plate Sizzles & Fizzle’s with Old and New Political criminal posted for line ups…..

Hell I will even “Dig up the “Motherfucking” Stale Ass…Deep Cold Grave…..

to bring you the “Super Bowl” blow out of

wrap this motherfucker up with “Fizzle dead coverage this 2011 special prime time opportunity in your fucking home ....

Remember it is only Pre/pay Coverage…..

for you small party,.....

company showcase,.......

school capabilities….....

Just pay your Dumb Dam Internet Bill…ya “Silly...…

a cost effective, hassle-free ......

and instantly gratifying incentive that your "Nosy Ass" will truly

Love………………

Cmdr. Bluefin USN.....................

 

bluefinlch2

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by bluefinlch2

01-25-2011, 05:00 PM

  #7

bluefinlch2

Senior Member

 

Join

Amend 00808 on "Sarah Palin" and Vice President "Dick Cheney"..Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

446.The Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) assert respectfully before the Honorable Court

Date: Aug 2010

Location: Houston

Posts: 101

that the Defendants (The United States of America) Politicians consistently use Ear Marks and Pork waisting the Defendant's and Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (The United State of America) taxpayers money on Pet Projects.

Many of which are questionable as to the benefit to the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (Negro) African-Americans currently still declared “Second Class Citizens.

Furthermore, Sarah Palin the Defendant's (The United States of America) state of Alaska's former “Governor” and Former Republican Vice-presidential Candidate,

As Governor, Sarah Palin opted to use the $200 million that Congress had originally set aside (Ear marked) for the bridge project linking the town of Ketchikan (population 7,500) with an airport on sparsely populated Gravina island and used the Pork Funds for other transportation projects.

On or about 2009 Sarah Palin was allegedly Embezzling from the Wasillia Sports Complex Project while she was the Defendant's (The United States) Mayor of the town of Wasilla, Alaska in 2002.

The $12million plus project ended up in the hands of contractors who were friends of friends of Sarah Palin.

Secondly, at around the same time the sports complex was being built, so was Sarah Palin’s new house.

It is alleged that the materials in Sarah Palin's new house are the exact same materials used in the sports complex

Currently Sarah Palin is promoting her political agenda, which is indicative of an agenda contrary to the interests of the Plaintiff and Plaintiff's (Negro) Black African-American which is very hostile and extreme conservative in nature

Furthermore the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s)

respectfully assert before the Honorable Court (Palin) among other in this (Tea Party) promoting the (White) Supremacist interests,

In direct collusion with the legacy of the Defendant (The United States of America) system of chattel free slave labor.

To include but not limited to the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) assert (Palin) among others in this (Tea Party) furtherance’s in a Direct collusion scheme of things with the legacy of Co-Defendant herein (President Andrew Johnson ) system of chattel free slave labor

With the Co-Defendant (President Andrew Johnson) added bonus win “by any means necessary “hostile” “Ku Klux Klan”

All of which is indicative of an agenda contrary to the full interests, rights, dignity, freedom, and equal protection under the law for the Plaintiff and Plaintiff's (Negro) Black African-American within all of the Defendants herein (The United States of

America) territory.

The Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) will further respectfully show before the “Honorable United States Federal Court” the Following current results of the “Agenda Activities” of Sarah Palin and Her political (Tea Party) caused in 2011 as following:

1. Jared Loughner attempted assassination of “Congress-Women” “Gabrielle Gifford” ended in fatal results due in large parts to attacks made upon (Gifford) votes for Human dignity to include the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) National Interest:

A. Christina Taylor Green, age 9 was wheeled from a Church in a “Child –Size” Coffin to the “Mournful strains of bagpipes.

B. United States Federal Justice “John Roll” also is being “Mournful” by the United States of America “in this fall-out shooting along with

C. Dorothy Morris, 76,

D. Phyllis Schneck, 79

E. Dorwin Stoddard, 76

F. Gabe Zimmerman, 30;

G. Wounded are “Pam Simon”

H. And “Rep. Gabrielle Giffords”.

All of which Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Respectfully assert before the above-entitled Honorable U.S. District Court being executed under a “Killer Hostile Fraction Style”regardless of any “mental issues” being current in claims,

And in a “Direct Attack” for the “Special Efforts of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (Among others)

in (Gifford’s) Biblical movement(s) among others towards a “Real Re-Construction of

the Defendant(s) (The United States of America) “New World”

for the “full constitutional benefits to include the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (Negro) African American.

488.The Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) will respectfully show the Honorable Court that all of the follow happened during the Defendant's (The United States of America) President George W. Bush and Vice-President Cheney's Administration

Furtherance’s Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Respectfully Assert all of which was very indicative in all

Forms, fashions, instruments, documentations, presentations against the best interest of the Plaintiff and all Plaintiff(s) (Negro) Black African-Americans herein:

a. Presidential Signing Statements a Policy that Institutes Rule by Decree

b. No-Bid Domestic Soil Detention Camps Built by Halliburton

c. Conspiring to establish permanent colonial control over 70% of Iraq's oil

d. Selling Control Operations of 6 U.S. ports to the Dubai Port despite Objections from Congress and the Public namely Plaintiff and Plaintiff's

e. the Cost of a "Medicaid Reform" (Original Knight-Ridder Article in .DOC Format)

f. Tax Cuts Benefit Rich & Wealthy Most

g. Bush Defends Most Corrupt Congressman, Tom Delay.

h. Undermining and Attempting to Privatize

Social Security.

I. Worst Jobs Creation Record Under Any President

j. 2005 Energy Bill Eviscerates Environmental Protections & Gives Tax Breaks to Big Oil Companies.

k. Bush Rejects One-Time Windfall Tax on Oil Industry.

l. Deregulation of FCC to Benefit Wealthy Via Appointment of Michael Powell

m. Cheney & Bush Declare Dictatorial Powers Expansions of Martial Law, Section 1076: Bush as Dictator

n. Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR) Knowingly Over-Charging Tax Payers, No Spending Limits in Iraq

o. Contractor Swindling

p. Bush’s Repeated Attempts to Cripple

Children’s Health care

q. “Massive Failure” in Government Accountability for Billions Spent and Weapons Lost

r. KBR Contractors Indicted for War Profiteering

s. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Resigns in Disgrace But Not Before Gutting Department

t. KBR Using Cayman Islands as Tax Shelter to Avoid Paying Medicare, Social Security and Other Taxes

u. Bush Purposefully Leaving FEC Unfilled to Manipulate Campaign Finance Enforcement Agency

v. Private Contractors Ignore Spending Rules to the Tune of $8.2 Billion

w. Bush Financier Gets $80-Million Pentagon Contract despite Being an FBI

Fugitive

w. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Gives $500k to Low-Ranking Golfing Group Chaired by Bush Sr.

To include but not limited to the “Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s)” will assert and unproblematic, at ease, stress-free & simply show before the Honorable Court that “Vice-President Dick Cheney”:1. On or about a day on the heels of the January 8 shooting spree in Tucson, Ariz., which left six dead and 14 wounded as described in the Amend Complaint of the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s).

2. Former Vice – President “Dick Cheney” attempted with inflicting terror among the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) and others by usage of a device (IED) for bombing in a premeditated scheme of things for purpose to inflict a state of terror within the United States of America against the current Presidential Administration for political,

personal and vindictive reasoning

3. (Dick) collectively with hidden confederates all tranquil with full intent on having a “very lethal”, full impact & potential intent to inflict “multiple innocent casualties. By such (IED) bomb."

4. To cause such casualties Among the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (Negro) Black African American to include but not limited to (among many others) non-race different of (Negro) Black African Americans others

5. All whom being innocent in nature and present during the Martin Luther King Day parade in Spokane, Wash. Within the Defendant (The United States of America) on January 17, 2011

6. For a “Mad Man Mastermind Killer design” by Former Vice President Dick Cheney establishment in collision, control of the “Oval Office” of the Defendants (The United States of America) for profit(s), and political gain(Among other things)

reasoning to maintain continue wrongful, legal control, pattern and practices design in serious straightforward continue exploits over the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (Negro) Black African American future life, duration, dignity, will, welfare, well being and respect as described herein the “Amend Complaint” of the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s)

7. For collective purpose Former Vice President Dick Cheney illegal hidden conspirer & Explosive agenda in attempt at “Civil War” being a device of re-establishments control of the “Oval Office” of the Defendants (The United States of America) as the past “legacy has dictated this patter and practices.

8. Former Vice President Dick Cheney “Hostile” institution in maintaining Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) be said described device herein for furtherance’s continue controlling state of purgatory poverty, control of modern enforcement of “Slavery” upon the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) throughout past (Negro) Black African American

descendants difficult history

9. To the Present date Former Vice – President “Dick Cheney” attempted to achieve the same with usage of mental terror, and by usage of a explosive device (IED) bombing, in a premeditated scheme of things, for purpose to inflict a state of terror, within the United States of America to cause among other thing “Civil War” against the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) life, rights, will, and peace and dignity

10. Which such “Civil War” having already been inflicted enough throughout the past of the Defendants herein (The United States of America) “New Complicated World”.

11. Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Respectfully assert before the Honorable Court that Former Vice President “Dick Cheney” further attempt to re-engage the Defendants (The United States of America) into another state of being at “Civil War” in a criminal (Explosive) style engagement(s)

for a anxious demand in light of (Dick Cheney) current “Health reasoning and Halliburton current civil (RICO) criminal penalties.

12. All wrongfully in criminal action(s) of Former Vice-President Dick Cheney, thus being done and directed at the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (LIVES)… (Among others)...For both “personal, vindictive & political” purpose.

13. To include as device of “future advantage” of (RNC) Republican National Convention assets for smear during the 2012 Presidential Election Campaigns against the current (Obama) Administration.

14. And using by further design against (Sarah Palin) Presidential “Tea Party” as the inflicting explosive “escape-goat/cow” party doing such Criminal “Explosive” (RICO) Actions.

15. Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) will show

respectfully show the Honorable Court Former Vice – President “Dick Cheney” On or about Dec. 29, 2009 attempted bombing of an international passenger flight from Netherlands to United States,

16. Doing the same pattern and practices in the recent past thus putting the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (Negro) Blacks African American in the same criminal (RICO) pawn position as described in paragraph (488) (2), and (3) above with the unexpected possible loss of “Random Innocent Physical harm and Loss of Life”

17. For a continue maintaining “White Supremacy Agenda” already established in the Defendants (The United States of America) as (Man Man Mastermind Bomber Dick Cheney) continue being false in bogus apply pressure in claiming the Defendants (The United States of America) is un-safe by the current undersign Presidential (Obama) Administration while (Dick) engage his collective criminal intent on putting the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) (Negro)

Black African Americans (among others) lives at continue possible faith in a “Mental” state of terror of (Dick),

18. To include but not limited to Defendants (The United States of America) physical human occupants regardless of (“National origin”) suffer real-physical permanent injury(s), and “Physical losses of life due to “Future Deaths” through Continue Bombing (among others) “Hostile (RICO) Criminal Civil War Type-Killer Tactic(s)”.

 

bluefinlch2

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by bluefin

lch2

01-26-2011, 03:49 PM

  #8

bluefinlch2

Senior Member

 

Join Date: Aug 2010

Location: Houston

Posts: 101

Cmdr. Bluefin To “Houston” Scrooge Attorney: Harry C. Arthur et al…xoxox

To “Houston” Scrooge Attorney: Harry C. Arthur et al…xoxox

What’s up Scrooge and the “Entire” “Hole in the Wall gang”……..A/k/a Law Office(s) of Harry C. Arthur.

Thought a Brother checks in on ya all & especially you “Scrooge Attorney” and see how your “Stinky Shit pumping” ticker of a fucked up Heart...

is (Collectively) holding out……..too, Da”…….xoxoxox

“Did not want ya thinking I forgot my…..as

my man say (mathematicals)……….

As “Clint Eastwood” said in a Few Dollars More ……..ha, ha,

Can’t blame a (Nigger) for checking in on his $16.2 Million Dollars portfolio’” Civil Suit” investment…..

You good “Church Stealing Bastard”…….

Hell “Scrooge dudes your worthless ass “Attorney Law Degree” and the whole entire fucked up “Hole in the Wall Gang” Attorneys Laws Degrees is actually fucking having appeal, merit, attraction, value, and some big 2011 “Significance….

“especially in Free Internet Advertisement(s)………

Have ya fucking check on “Google.com: (Dumb) ass…..

Here is a preview for ya fucked up “Good Church stealing ass”………..xoxooxo

everything from ("Scrooge Clocks to gourmet “Christmas baskets”)

1. Scrooge clocks - Home“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. Launches, scrooge and the inflatable bath chair - enter the void. ...studentscornerpretoria.com/loc-scrooge-clocks.html - Cached1. Welsh scrooge -a welsh born icon: a christmas carol; Mrs scrooge - blackwell bookshop online; “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million ...premier-lofts.com/ozu-welsh-scrooge.html - Cached► 2. Jet scrooge listen - ALM Fjármál - Heim / Homeholiday special with ebeneezer scrooge and christopher walken ... auburn “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million b-52 s christmas music ...fjarmalaradgjof.com/io-jet-scrooge-listen.html - Iceland - Cached3. “Scrooge Attorney” Harry C. Arthur

Esq.et al (16.2) Million ...Scrooge Attorney” Harry C. Arthur Esq.et al (16.2) Million Dollars Settlement Offer" Legal Advice.forums.backpage.com/showthread.php?t=92554 - Cached4. Keeping christmas scrooge - Adventist City Missions“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million: Storing christmas scrooge • christmas punch with champagne • christmas crafts painting ...adventistcitymissions.org/jz/uja-keeping-christmas-scrooge.html - Cached5. Outline scrooge -“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. how to draw uncle scrooge mcduck | video « wonder how to. Compare scrooge in toys at shop.com ...maxgallico.com/th-outline-scrooge.html - Cached6. Scrooge antiques - Welcome To Eye of the Islandslighst for christmas village houses; Beswick charactor scrooge toby jug no.372 | www.antiques.co.uk |; “scrooge attorney”

harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) ...eyeoftheislands.com/sy-scrooge-antiques.html - Cached7. Scrooge riddles - Add-A-Cart CatalogThestreet.com news - save like scrooge as holidays approach ... scrooge clues -; “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million ...youthenatia.com/jr-scrooge-riddles.html - Cached1. Bloom county scrooge - Therapy Care Plus - Web Based Practice ...“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. The bloom county library, volume one: 1980-1982 - buy cheap books ...therapycareplus.com/zw-bloom-county-scrooge.html - Cached1. Topper from scrooge young - Institute of Art and LawFlipkart book list: from scrooge wore spurs to scrumpy ... “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million ...ial.uk.com/adv-topper-from-scrooge-young.html - Cached1. Scrooge undigested lettuce - Index of /

“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. christmas parade videos • for christians & messianic jews - energy freedom - the next ...eportal.me/ya-scrooge-undigested-lettuce.htm - Cached1. Scrooge undigested peas - Opportunity making money from home with ...“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million; Dining with scrooge by gary north. white christmas screen shots. Christmas carol, a (1938) ...cashfornewbiesnow.com/zu-scrooge-undigested-peas.html - Cached2. Boys scrooge jokes - Pete von Haasl - Homechristmas word find; “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million; after christmas sale on artifical trees Christmas carol ebenezer scrooge ...petevonhaasl.com/vu-boys-scrooge-jokes.html - Cached1. Scrooge cheats -“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. Scrooge cheats christmas carol • new funny scrooge pic! «

maymay453′s club penguin cheats! ...mstranspo.com/cfo-scrooge-cheats.html - Cached2. Ocean scrooge me - Homegifts under 50 - picvi videos: “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million: A christmas carol by charles dickens. story of scrooge ghost ...paroimia.com/po-ocean-scrooge-me.html - Cached3. Sauce scrooge - Home PageI'm no scrooge, but - the dis discussion forums - disboards.com. “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. merry christmas darling 2 22 ...healthandhappinesscoaching.com/dea-sauce-scrooge.html - Cached1. Ship sewing scrooge - Welcome“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. steampunk coat dr jekyll mr hyde costume sewing by peoplepackages. Pen to paper: september 2009 ...bluekelpie.com/rpu-ship-sewing-scrooge.html - Cached► 2. They called her scrooge - Thingz4all - a

little something 4 everyone“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million • the world of wealth: channeling scrooge: evicting tenants during. merry christmas screensavers ...thingz4all.com/ol/fw-they-called-her-scrooge.html - Cached3. Scrooge of outline - rantomonline - Home“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million Scrooge plot outline Scrooge of map. Summary of a christmas carol: synopsis charles dickens ...rantomonline.com/ei-scrooge-of-outline.html - Cached4. Antique welsh scrooge - Welcome“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. Ebenezer scrooge christmas - 403 forbidden. Tips for winter driving - by tom welsh - helium ...goldcoastmarinegroup.com/lud-antique-welsh-scrooge.html - Cached1. Scrooge riddles - Family“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. Baby's first scrooge - brasserie tenafly restaurant; 72 miles from the sea: scrooge and marley ...

beausoleil.cc/pry-scrooge-riddles.html - Cached2. Metal pyramids scrooge - kansascitynotaryagent.com/index.html“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. newgrounds search: "metal gear awesome". cheap christmas paperware ...gethomerefinancemortgage.com/jy-metal-pyramids-scrooge.html - Cached3. Letters: Tiger's tale revisited | Viewpoints, Outlook | Chron.com ...Dec 4, 2009 ... Regarding “He aims to turn off The Beacon; Attorney claims homeless ... that Ebenezer Scrooge walks among us, disguised as Harry C. Arthur, ...http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...k/6754113.html - Cached4. Marine sewing scrooge - Christopher-M HomeDressmaker deluxe sewing machine - guelph best deal. akulapera teams are also conducting marine. “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million ...christopher-m.com/oc-marine-sewing-scrooge.html - Cached

5. Scrooge in porter - Math Mom Online - Welcome“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. Take your carol | the house next door. 'scrooge' takes center stage for the holidays | deseret ...mathmomonline.com/mek-scrooge-in-porter.html - Cached1. Scrooge riddles - James Caraway Christian Academy“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. Answers for christmas riddles - home. family guy ghost of christmas future - hallowed grounds a ...jccachickasha.org/ff-scrooge-riddles.html - Cached2. Smelt scrooge - Samsara Solutions LLC“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million; A christmas carol, by charles dickens; stave 3: the second of the; Charles dickens a christmas ...samsarasol.com/per-smelt-scrooge.html - Cached3. Spite scrooge stave - hendrycorporation.com - Our Clients“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al

(16.2) million A christmas carol-stave 3 part 3; ebenezer scrooge : scrooge and the english language ...hendrycorporation.com/xoi-spite-scrooge-stave.html - Cached4. Ancient scrooge -Nbcindia.com: uncle scrooge #379 by carl banks,paul halas,gorm; “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million; what christmas carol could come ...forevermoers.com/eu-ancient-scrooge.html - Cached5. Noises scrooge -'doctor who' visits scrooge in christmas special | airlockalpha.com; “scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million; Scrooge | slots | roxy ...ambergold-ocean.com/tic-noises-scrooge.html - Cached6. Fruit scrooge - Welcome to Palmer Ohana“scrooge attorney” harry c. arthur esq.et al (16.2) million. gourmet christmas baskets. the full story of scrooge • animated christmas objects ...palmerohana.com/wp-fruit-scrooge.html -

Cached

Well you all should be extra “Shity Scared” right about now,,,,

seeing on how’s that “Mean Old Hang em High” Honorable Texas Federal Judge…. has ah been burning the “Mid Night Oil’s….

Benz Eating lots of “Wisconsin” prime cut (USDA) cheddar cheese sandwiches……

Plenty of Cold Milk’s –n-things

with them macadamia nuts cookies……

and the Honorable Court I heard…..

order up some “Chilly-fries sausage Burgers”...

with extra “Red Hot sauce” for the “Mean AN Extra Mean case of “Heart Burns”....

While Figuring on how’s to re-discovering a

new “Twang” to the meaning of hang ya (Scrooge) Crooked Ass extra high…………………

Sorry my bad “Scrooge” et al, I been a tad bit busy with the “Big Time Texas Hurricane Umberto Krooked Attorney Civil Action….

Staring none other than… (Attorney Antoine L. Freeman J. D. Esq.) and his “pack of “Mad Dogs” of Clients),

In my Sherlock Holmes Mystery Case of the: “Dead Man Who Paid Taxes”………

And then you see (Scrooge) their this old reoccurring Hurricane Katrina issues, that seem to hunt my fucking “Dreams”………..

have not even came up with a title yet for the “Sherlock Holmes” Mystery” staring Krooked Hurricane Katrina Attorney Willie M. Zanders et al,...

a 2 for 1 sell on Federal Civil Actions ....

(some people like it really rough)……

Then there is The Sherlock Holmes comedy Case of the Crooked Three Stooges” which is in under a state of Honorable deliberation(s) as we speak..

just like ya all’s crooked Scrooge et al Collectively Crooked Asses………

In my special “Scrooge Sherlock Holmes Case” of the “Talking Treasure Box”…………….xxoxoxox

But wait there is “more Scrooge Attorney” you been bump down, and fucking hit the skids to the Number “Three spot” in my “Sherlock Holmes Mysteries fucked up shit head list,.....

Coming in Number 2 is none other than my Sherlock Holmes Case: “The Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor” staring none other the ex-brother in-law….

Doctor Prince Samuel Benjamin Magnus- Lawson M.D......

(Chapters 1-14) already posted for ya entertainment(s)And for the reasoning of your recent “down grade” (Scrooge Attorney) and trust me I am so very fucking sorry too…..

But my Sherlock Holmes Mystery thriller: Case of the “Crooked Dead President” has taken on whole new very unpredictable touchy feeling “explosive developments”……..

“Scrooge Dude” you think your Candy Ass” Lavender Panties is Scared & Semi-Soiled waiting on that “Mean Old Hang em High Honorable Texas Federal Judge” like the Rest(s) of you other shipwreck Rat’s…….

You isn’t seen crap”……..like the “Shit” being slightly wash away in the numerous rains in 2 years but still left on your dam “Building” in 2011……..(Report)………

(Scrooge Attorney) we is Talking “Top High Dollar End Cut’s of “Killer Bomber” Prime Time “Political Meat(s)” on the fucking (USDA) Federal Smoking Stoke and Ready Honorable Federal Court’s grill……

extra yummy………….xoxoxox

Now you can see my dangerous excuse I respectfully extend to you, I did not want ya feeling a little left out,

do not worry here is my special hugs-n-kisses, with some (Smooches)…and a tricky i will steal you soon some Jell-O desert for your ““Shity pumping” fucked up “Ticker Scrooge Heart”....

don’t want ya going into “Cardio attack” on my “$16.2 Million Dollars Investments” ...

when you stinky eyes open the “Envelope” and read the almost soon to be printed Honorable Courts report-n-recommendations of a Hang em High ordeal...

Got to go something likely to fucking explode.. and fuck up something “Real legal”,....

Fucking Wait a second…..?

What is this “Scrooge Attorney…..ya really trying to say something to me “Cmdr. Bluefin”…..?

“Speak up Scrooge Dude”………

:Lives from Houston Texas here is Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur:

“I Want you to Die”…. “Mr. Bond”………….

O.K. “Gold Finger Scrooge Dude”

I’ll just get right on that……Da”…..xoxoxx

(Peace out America) See ya Crooked Asses in U.S. Federal Court or on this “Wire Thingy”…..ha, ha,

Cmdr. Bluefin and the “Entire Holy Church congregations all chimes in on “Here is Ya some extra special hum……”Dial Tones”………………………

And “No Soup for You”..(Houston Scrooge Attorney)….

from Jerry Seinfeld Show…“Soup Nazi”….Da……xoxoox!

Last edited by bluefinlch2; 01-26-2011 at 03:53 PM.

Reason: mis-spell

 

bluefinlch2

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by bluefin

lch2

01-28-2011, 02:28 PM

  #9

bluefinlch2

Senior Member

 

Join Date: Aug 2010

Location: Houston

Posts: 101

To Fucked up Doctor Prince Samuel Benjamin Magnus Lawson M.D........xoxoxo"

How is it hanging extra thick V. D. runny light and green-n- yellow dripping “Dick” M.D. Doctor down the old undershorts ex-brother in-law been crooked Ass doing and stealing……

Boy did you know your fucking super –semi famous too…

, my “Sherlock Holmes Story Case of the Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor is high up there with people like Robert Downey JR. and Judd Law .....

,“Guy Ritchie and his cheese ass (Sherlock Holmes) movie ....

mines the best………

We “Got your sorry ”Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor” Lawson M.D. Stinky Yellow –n- Green Dripping Dick Ass” and Submarines and things……

, German Girls, Slaves, Crooked Pirates And plenty of unholy drama for ya mama soon to be fucking un-folding ……….“Live on the Backpage.com”…..

The Son of “Bitches like at A/k/a (“Dream Works Inc.”)haves to go and fake shit up (Fucking Bastards)…And sell Movies seats and popcorn, candies, drinks, and things….plus they get monies too……

I got you…………………..

Fucking dripping dick Doctor dude they

done went off the “Sherlock Holmes Flipping chart List with “Investigations into: and I shit you not “Jack the Ripper”………

, then their Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde,....

Sherlock Holmes vs. Batman…… (Now somebody out there is smoking some real good shit on this one…..

Here is my P.O. Box 20126 Houston Tx 77225 slip some of that smoke past the (Postal Police)……

Let me see what your “Good Smoking Ditch-weed Ass” working with …Fucking “Sherlock Holmes vs. Batman…any thing for a Fucking dollar……….And Drip dick M.D. a fucking “Sherlock Holmes” (Vampire Thriller)….the mean old one…”Dracula….. (Them bitches “Watson “better watch their fucking throats)…..

Did you know they even got the “Question out there is “Sherlock Holmes” a Fucking Vulcan….?

But don not fret not a second of worries (Stain Shorts M.D.) The Villainous – Professor James Moriarty will still be your sleeper cell agent Brother in “England” A/ka/……Dortrupt……

Well Sherlock Holmes Case of the “Crooked Dead President” took a whole new explosive move for my “Top spot” in my Crooked Collection,all being actual Live in the flesh “Mysteries” with a few dugs up from the “Old Grave Guest appearance personally ……..:ee

So if you really in a Federal (A.T.F.) state of mind style dare wanting to compete then Hook up something “extra explosive scary shit up”And I bump ya Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor

Ass (ASAP) back up to the number #1….

But I must have to really warn ya (Butt Fuck M.D.)….Sherlock Holmes” Case of the Crooked Dead President is “Very, Very Live…Very top notch Ex-Vice President Explosive shit….Plus they got shit in there that Make ya want to run for cover from “shooting rampages”

With old-n- new type wanted “Dead or Live” some motherfucking cold blooded extra scary beating slave, killing niggers, hanging, and blow up your “Church house shit……So if you can beat that….and be my favorite “Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor” ex-brother in-law

I will just for brother in-law old family sake… bump ya Dripping V.D. Dick Ass to # 1.....So see you and the fuck up Bride of Doctor Frankenstein in the “Backpage.com

“Movies”…..xoxoxoox

Its fixing to really start getting scary “Holmes, Watson and XO Cmdr. Bluefin is almost done with his “High Sea” Adventures in route to (America)….xoxoxoox maybe (65) Chapter too……..

but why am I telling you when you been watching the rating too………..Da”Peace the Fuck out “Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor….I got to go……

Fucking mom is beating crazy on the dam bath room door again….wanting to know what is fuck taking me so long………….Dam It Mom…….I am playing with my “Dick” again...(MOM…it’s about to “explode………..

 

bluefi

nlch2

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by bluefinlch2

01-29-2011, 02:28 PM

  #10

bluefinlch2

Senior Member

 

Join Date:

To “Sticky Fingers” Tom Delay, Future Cell-Block 7 “King Pin”

“How’s ya “Sorry Lame Ass” No Good at Money Laundry, soon to be “Federal Prison” yard “Shit pumping Heart” is Fucking Holding out (Too)…..

Aug 2010

Location: Houston

Posts: 101

Boy (Dude) you…. (Sticky Fingers Stale Turkey Smelling Tom Delay)….

I (Cmdr. Bluefin) Hereby shall assert before all of the Honorable Court(s), and The (USMS) United States Marshall Services, .....

from “Maine”….to….”California”….on three of them stack’s of “Holy Books” …..

Truly certified to the entire nation(s) (Federal Prison orientation committee(s)…

“Sticky Fingers “Tom Delay” herein” to be an A-1 class criminal .....

Whom adjustment times and “Republican Agenda” will fit in just “extra good”, xoxoxo

(Sticky “Dip” Fingers)...

You buy ya “Crooked Ass” $20.00...worth of “Cup of Noodles Soups,

$10.00 worth of “Beef Jerky”,.....

Get ya Old Lady to toss ya two bundles of “Smoking Tobacco”over the wall, ....Stuff up your “Fat Funky Criminal Ass”,.....

½ pound of “Top Grade “Ditch Weed”, ….

16 grams balloons of “Powder Cokecaine”…..

22 grams balloons of “Crackcaine”,…..

38 E-Tablets,.......

100 grams of “Meth”……….

And 55 balloons of “Heroin”….

Hook up a big batch of Toilet “Flavor” “Jungle Juice” in the “Trash Bag”….with extra “stolen prison “sugar & yeast”……

Steal ya some “Chess pieces from the game room” and melt them down for ya

some prison “Ink Tattoos”…..

Throw on the hard as “old steel” table some grill (USDA) “cheeses sandwiches for all of the fellows welcome committee....

And whatever ya do be sure and make you an electrical stringer for some purée wall outlet “Sunday “coffee brunch”……..

And you the “King Pin Cell Block-7 Man”….

Just ya watch ya fat stale “Turkey smelling Ass” in the Shower…….

Any “Bitch” or “Bastard” comes up on ya in “Prison Powder Blue” Jump suit”….”talking sick twisted trash”…..

Word to the (Dumb) new-be extra wise, slap “her sugar tank Ass” straight out the fucking gate,That’s your “New Girl”……

Got to set the “Dick swinging Ho’ Ass Bitch straight from fucking day one…..

You tell the “Bitch Ho”….

you got the bottom bunks, and them boxer better be starched –n-fold, iron out with a prison comb……

and you get the last drag on all smokes….

“Anybody extra scary & (Dark)…..toss ya Scary extra “white pale prick Ass” a full new pack of smokes”

ya just get the fuck up… smile softly….and “Run……………..

That “Nigger” is most definitely looking for some of your “White”…. “Brown Hole”……

Don’t worry; I got ya back….when I take the Defendant(s) (The United States of America) to Trial…

I will be hosting a “Wedding Party”…..for the “Jury”...

Something (Old, Used & Borrow)….

Something “Old” will be the “VP Bomber”…(Crazy Mad Max Dick)….,.With them old Hunt-n-Halloween “KKK” Bombing “Scare-n-Tricks”….

Something Used will be “Sarah Palin” Passing out “Killer Drinks” at her poison “Tea Party”…

Something “Borrow” will be (YOU)….“Sticky Turkey Smelling Finger(s)”… “Tom Delay”

I will be (Borrowing) your Crooked Sticky Fingers Ass from Federal Prison”, ha, ha…..

They gonna slap ya Extra Crooked Dumb Ass in some “Fancy Chains” for a ride on “Con Air”For a Little Federal Court Trial Outing……

to see the “Mean Old Hang em High Texas Federal Judge” …..(Again)……

See told ya a Brother Got Ya “Back”…….

But remember (Perjury before any Honorable Court is a Crime),….

Hate to see ya “Get set Back further in with “Power Sexy Bitch Blue”……..xioxooo....

 

bluefinlch2

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by bluefinlch2

Page 1 of 4

1234>

Facts.

Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) will show the Honorable Entitled Court” that the Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) corrupt practices against (Negro African Americans) has continue to allowed “judicial manipulation” and “corruption to run rampant” in (The United States of America) and (State of Texas) Judicial Justice system being

Direct against the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) because of his National origin of (Negro) in favor of a “Whiteman”

Moreover Plaintiff continue to be subjected to “racist segregationist laws” known as “Black Codes” in 2009, 2010 and 2011 which is being executed under “non-disclosure format” though out the Defendant (The United States of America) and at current in the decision of U. S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Johnson and in the decision of State of Texas, Harris County 215 District Court Judge, Steven Kirkland

Obviously provided “Case Fixing & Corruption” in aid & abet for one (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) RICO crimes & under the disguise of “Judicial Civil Proceedings” held before said described Defendant & Co-Defendants usage of “Judges” specializing in the "big fix" in collusion with (Arthur et al), and (The Marine Building L.L.C. et al)

Engaging in furtherance of fraud of the Court, actual fraud conspiracy, case fixing, falsification of official court records. aided in obstruction of justice and conspiracy in Hiding assets with the connivance of all illegal activates being conducted during alleged “Honorable Court

Proceedings” To sabotage Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) completely against his civil alleged right, peace ,dignity and will solely

Because if Plaintiff was allow to legally proceeded the evidence would have indeed uncover the facts that would put (Arthur et al, Attorneys at Laws)

And The Marine Building L.L.C. et al, Attorneys at Laws) approximately in excess of (12) “Attorneys all whom being “White Race” in and for the “State of Texas” under (among other things) “Full disbarment” for a very long time for all of the criminal (RICO) mail and wire fraud as described by the Pro Se Plaintiff.

Plaintiff Assert Respectfully before the “Honorable Court first this action started in Harris County District Court as described by the background information above in and for The State of Texas,

To Wit: 215 District Court Judge “Steven Kirkland” extreme in hostile attack of the Plaintiff as to “What do you want” in my Court room, (Meaning Nigger)“Because of you (Arthur Esq.) has dismiss his law suit against Christ Church”

“To the demeaning hostile unwarranted “open court” attacking of the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) herein for not being in “attendance” in (Judge Kirkland) Chambers when he already

rule in secrete that I (Plaintiff) was not “Homeless” in favor of “Whiteman” (Arthur et al)

Regardless by “Law” the hearing was set for a full ruling by an “Honorable Court” in “Private Chambers” by “Honest Law” without the presences of any parties to include the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) as the Judge Kirkland be-little” and usage of deception to make the Plaintiff to appear, dim-witted, dense, dull, slow, brainless, unintelligent and XXX stupid.

“To now Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) can run his “homeless with “full intent” “Nigger” self on back to the streets… and “come back”, when he has some “Money”…I (Judge Kirkland) already made my ruling against you….. “Even if your “Homeless and indigent” ….Defendant …. (Arthur Esq.) and (Marine Building L.L.C. is a (“Whiteman”)……you can leave now.”

The Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) even file the correct document as required before hand showing the Plaintiff is in fact “Indigent and a “Ward of The Co-Defendant (State of Texas) with Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) submitting of official documents of SSI (Records) as required by Texas State Law in furtherance in Proof of Plaintiff Indigent status, with proof of the Plaintiff is in Federal Court filing at present already rule under “Indigent status”… which the Co- Defendant (State of Texas 215 District Court in Harris County Texas was “Dead

Certain” in the full 100% protection of “White Defendant” (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C.) over Plaintiff Hamilton II (Negro) “Nigger”.

Plaintiff Assert Respectfully before the “Honorable Court” ahead of this rude, disgusted, crooked, and “shameful display” by the Co-Defendant (State of Texas) 215 District Court”

Plaintiff facing former appearance with the “215 District Court”, had premeditated “veil in disguise” with a group of “Attorneys” several week’s at a lecture for continue legal education in which “Judge Steven Kirkland” was a “guest Judge speaker” for a Group of a “Black Attorneys” discussing his 215 Court room rules Like-n-dislike

And other stuff to this legal effect” in the Harris County Criminal Court Building in Houston Texas….during this time frame The Judge Kirkland was most respectful, courteous, considerate, and a little humors, to the point several notes the Plaintiff took seem worth giving some consideration.

Plaintiff further assert that “Judge Kirkland” ask the question “Who like filing long discovery motion which my reaction was to quick and my hand pop up, but I decline to answer and apologized stating I do not think I should answer that question, which (Judge Kirkland) was perplex in my reply because he was under the full impression…. I (Plaintiff) was an “Attorney of Law”...In a “Nice Suit”…in Attendances (Yet)

Plaintiff was in fact doing Recon before going before the 215 Harris County District Court.

The Co-Defendant herein (State of Texas) 215 District Court in Harris County Texas provided full Illegal case fixing to protect (Arthur et al) fraud activities, with the under stood objective of the Court” to conceal the deposition conducted upon (Arthur Esq.)

To the extreme point of (Judge Kirkland) rude falsification of “official court records” that the Plaintiff is not Indigent to “apply obstruction of justice” because the Plaintiff is a (Negro) “Nigger” and (Arthur et al) or “White Defendants,

Furtherance conspiracy of Defendant (State of Texas) “215 District State Court in “Civil Conspirers, Civil Genocide,

Aid and abet in Hiding records, documents, evidence, physical assets of (Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) all of which being with the connivance of the Co-Defendant (State of Texas) 215 District Court and in pursed of the same criminal (RICO) criminal objectives of (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C.) in Violations under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization, Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity

in connection with identification documents), Section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice),

Section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal (RICO) investigations), section 1956 (relating to the laundering of monetary instruments), Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. § 1030 in connection with all criminal (RICO) acts and actions, as described herein, and conspiracies to violate (RICO).

Multiple Judicial Court procedures of Schemes and Patterns to commit among other things: Mail and Wire Fraud as described herein, and conspiracies to violate (RICO). Aiding and abetting to commit A Criminal Enterprise in Racketeering against the rights, dignity and will of the Plaintiff to include

“Obstruction of Justice”, Falsification of Material facts, Conspiracies to pursue the same Criminal Objective,

Co-Defendant (State of Texas) Violation of the Plaintiff (Negro) Equal Protection under the Law.

Breach of contractual written agreement in the Co-Defendant (State of Texas) Constitution and all laws thereof to the stated said “effect that the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) was a free (Negro) slave” and not subject to any of the current Laws of “Jim Crow” and “Black Codes” in the current time frame in 2009, 2010, and 2011 as during the past when such activities was outlawed.

Violation of the Plaintiff (Negro) herein (Hamilton II)civil rights protected by the Co-Defendant (State of Texas) Constitution in Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II asking for relief before a Texas State District Court for unfair treatment of one “Whiteman” namely (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) before a “Civil Court of Law.

Co-Defendant (State of Texas) Aid and abet in Civil Conspiracy, Actual Fraud, Fraud upon the Court, Malicious Civil Prosecution of a Tort , Injury to Plaintiff Personal Reputation, Impeaching Plaintiff Honesty, Imputation of Crime, Disease and or Sexual Misconduct,

Destruction, alter and or direct destruction of “Material Civil Evidences and Facts”, “Slander of the Plaintiff”, “Libel of Plaintiff”; And Defamation upon the Plaintiff reputation in this (RICO) Criminal activities.

Plaintiff Assert respectfully second this action involving (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. started next in the United States Federal Bob Casey Courthouse in Harris County, Texas after the rouge display in the Defendant (State of Texas) 215 District Court in Harris County Texas providing full Illegal case fixing to protect (Arthur et al) fraud activities, with the understood objective of the 215 District Court” to conceal the deposition conducted upon (Arthur Esq.)

To the extreme point of (Judge Kirkland) rude falsification of “official court records” that the Plaintiff is not Indigent to “apply obstruction of justice” in Plaintiff legal pursuit because the Plaintiff is a (Negro) “Nigger” and (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. or “White 90% Attorney(s) Defendants”,

The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant (The United States of America) U. S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Johnson Aid and abet in Hiding records, documents, evidence, physical assets of (Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) all of which being with the connivance of the Defendant (United States Federal Court Proceeding) and in pursed of the same criminal (RICO) criminal objectives of (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C.) in Violations under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization, Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents), Section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice),

Section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal (RICO) investigations), section 1956 (relating to the laundering of monetary instruments), Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)

18 U.S.C. § 1030 in connection with all criminal (RICO) acts and actions, as described herein, and conspiracies to violate (RICO).

Multiple Judicial Court procedures of Schemes and Patterns to commit among other things: Mail and Wire Fraud as described herein, and conspiracies to violate (RICO). Aiding and abetting to commit A Criminal Enterprise in Racketeering against the rights, dignity and will of the Plaintiff to include

“Obstruction of Justice”, Falsification of Material facts, Conspiracies to pursue the same Criminal Objective,

Defendant (United States of America) Violation of the Plaintiff (Negro) Equal Protection under the Law.

Breach of contractual written agreement in the Defendant (United States of America) Constitution and all laws thereof to the stated said “effect that the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) was a free (Negro) slave” and not subject to any of the current Laws of “Jim Crow” and “Black Codes” in the current time frame in 2009, 2010, and 2011 as during the past when such activities was outlawed.

Violation of the Plaintiff (Negro) herein (Hamilton II) civil rights protected by the Defendant (United States of America) 1st

Amendment to the Constitution of the Defendant (The United States of America) in that Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) is free in asking for relief before a “United States Federal Court” for

unfair treatment of one “Whiteman” namely (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) before a “Civil Court of Law as described in the Complaint(s).

To include but not limited to Defendant herein (United States of America) Aid and abet in Civil Conspiracy, Actual Fraud, Fraud upon the Court, Malicious Civil Prosecution of a Tort , Injury to Plaintiff Personal Reputation, Impeaching Plaintiff Honesty, Imputation of Crime, Disease and or Sexual Misconduct,

Destruction, alter and or direct destruction of “Material Civil Evidences and Facts”, “Slander of the Plaintiff”, “Libel of Plaintiff”; And Defamation upon the Plaintiff reputation in this (RICO) Criminal activities To Wit: U. S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Johnson Aid and abet in protection to Hiding & scuttle of records, documents, deposition evidence, and physical assets of one (Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) a “Whiteman & Defendant” over the Plaintiff a (Negro) all of which being with the connivance during Federal Court Proceeding on the behalf of Defendant herein (The United States of America) in that Aiding and abetting to conspirers to committing Criminal Enterprise in Racketeering with (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C.) against the civil rights, dignity and will of the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II)

Furtherance conspiracy of Defendant (The United States of America) “Bob Casey Federal Courthouse in Harris County, Texas in “Civil Conspirers, Civil Genocide, Destruction, alter and or aid in the direct destruction of “Material Civil Evidences and Facts”, “Slander of the Plaintiff”, “Libel of Plaintiff”; And Defamation upon the Plaintiff reputation in this (RICO) Criminal activities, court case fixing:

a. (Arthur et al) numerous lies in regards to “Work product” as described herein

b. (Arthur et al) numerous lies in regards to “Client/Attorney Privilege”

c. (Arthur et al) numerous lies in regards to Plaintiff have no standing under Texas State Law.

d. (Arthur et al) numerous lies in regards to loss in rental income when the Marine was at Maxim capacity when filed civil hostile tort against (Christ et al)

e. (Arthur et al) numerous lies in regards to property value loss

f. (Arthur et al) numerous lies in regards to Commercial property up keep

g. (Court) protection of the deposition evidence from the Plaintiff base solely upon Plaintiff race is

(Negro) “Nigger”…Simply because same said deposition was material in usage in stopping (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) civil attack against “White Church” Christ Church Cathedral. But Plaintiff need not apply he is a “Nigger” and under “Jim Crow Laws” and “Black Codes enforcement laws’…All Nigger are stupid because “White folks say so..No matter what the Physical evidence says against a “Whiteman lies”….

h. (Court) protection of the physical photographic evidence in Federal Court files and records by the Plaintiff show the complete impolite, nasty Commercial loss value of property at the Hands of (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C.C. et al) to include Commercial & trash Business Legal trash on the ground in said photograph already posted in court files.

i. (Court) protection of Defendants fleeing (Marine Building L.L.C et al) during civil proceedings with physical evidence.

Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) provided a ensnare upon the Defendant (The United States of America) “Bob Casey” Federal Courthouse

direct at U. S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Johnson to uncover (Magistrate Judge) Aid and abet in protection to Hiding & scuttle of records, documents, deposition evidence, and physical assets of one (Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) to wit:

1.

Nancy K. Johnson is a Federal Magistrate Judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas served in this position since 1990, Before becoming a Judge, (Nancy K. Johnson) worked as an “Assistant U.S. Attorney” in Texas and as an Assistant Attorney General in Ohio.

2.

The Plaintiff herein (Louis Charles Hamilton II) is the Owner of (Bluefin Inc.) and “Multi-Construction Company” and a “United States Navy Veteran”.

(Bluefin Inc.) Is a Special Freelance investigator “i ntelligence agency ” within the” United States of America”. Simple Plaintiff is (Negro American), therefore which said (Bluefin Inc.) is 100% “exclusive freelance” to the “XXX Honest”, “XXX Extra Hard working” Defendant herein (U.S. Government) “Law Enforcement” Special agency(s), dealing with those “XXX special individuals” whom are “Well beyond

the Laws of The U.S. of America” and as the CEO of (Bluefin Inc.)

I Plaintiff herein (Louis Charles Hamilton II) collected “Tax Free” ($$$) from the (U.S. Government) for ” XXX criminal activities” beyond (internal security) of the “U.S. Government” and (communities worldwide) and “without Notice” for such “Hostile activities” that the Defendant herein (The United States of America)

“Deem” not so nice and are “forever and a day forbidden”.

And on any “U.S. Government” “internal security needs” my CEO rules is simple’ you hunt your own “Crooks” and I deliver you mines, if you need me take a look at something well ya better have my “cash”.

I Plaintiff herein do not need a “stinky badge” or “either a gun”…I tell (U. S. Government) let’s take your “gun and your badge” and let’s go for a (Ride) with me (Cmdr. Bluefin CEO of Bluefin Inc.),

(Sometimes) I myself CEO of (Bluefin Inc.)....loves to go get you (XXX Special Criminal) to attempt to break your neck jumping through the back windshield of the (U.S. Government) “Special Car” with them (as they wait)

‘Cuss your an extra “XXX Special Scary Delivery” and they got "wife and kids".

now if any E.R. is involved you the (XXX Special Scary Criminal) already having “pistol whip an 8 year old child on the play ground”, XXX criminal on the run from the long arm of the law, “XXX Career specialist and already “Shot the Government Police in the Ass”... having them all “Hot and extra bothers “So you super suck and qualify for Bluefin Inc. and “business is still business”.

Now if the (Retarded XXX Target) is acting “XXX extra Crazy” especially in (communities worldwide) with the (U. S. Government) “XXX Honest”, “Extra Hard working” “Military” & “Law Enforcement” “Special agencies” dealing with those whom are “Well beyond the United States of America Laws” and making my “Customers” all XXX nerves-n-jittery and scary and thangs,

Well then by the Power invested in (Cool) me (Cmdr. Bluefin) CEO of (Bluefin Inc.)

And completely regardless if I am a (Second Class U.S. Citizen) “business is still business” and I a godly person also whom Loving/liking (Air)... I get to act a (XXX) “Extra Dam Fool” and protect my “Interest” (U.S. Government) from any “on the hot spot” physical harms, threats, and or multi-life ending violence “until them (U.S. Government)

Are return “safe to the full protection of their Government Special agency(s)” dealing with those in the “Next near Future” whom are consider “Well beyond the Law” of the U.S. of America, whom also being the Hand that feeds “100% Independent” (Bluefin Inc.).

Now any XXX person or XXX person(s) within the United States of America who is “above the Law of the U.S. of America” “especially involving and invoking against my “legal rights” within the Defendant (The United States of America) and making XXX prime not nice and are forever forbidden mistakes against the said Laws of the Defendants herein (The United States of America)

Namely one” Crooked Scrooge Attorney “Harry C. Arthur Esq.”,” Law office of “Harry C. Arthur et al,” and “The Marine Building L.L.C. et al”, and all whom being “White Race” consider the “Plaintiff a “Derelict” stupid homeless fucking Nigger”

Their after the Plaintiff having first hand witness the “XXX humiliation, serious emotional damage being cause to all of the helpless, weak, and sick at the (Beacon)by direct acts of “XXX Greed” of “Crooked Scrooge Attorney “Harry C. Arthur Esq.”,” Law office of “Harry C. Arthur et al,” and “The Marine Building L.L.C. et al”, after (5) minutes of my (Bluefin Inc.) Special Freelance investigator “i ntelligence agency ” within the” United

States of America” at the “Law office of Harry C. Arthur” (Pro Bono) and discover a long list pack of dog straight ass lies

Any person or person(s) involved in any cover up after that point of ”Nasty Discovery” and the “Hostile Civil pursuit” against “Christ Church Cathedral” is “XXX Crooked also”.

3.

“Harry C. Arthur Esq.” XXX Scrooge Attorney at Law Already Enjoyed direct “Ex-parte communications” with Harris County 215 District Court Judge (Steven Kirkland) to the point of the 215 District Court “complete nasty rudeness” in the open court attack at the (Plaintiff) which caught the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) off guards for about 2 minutes...as all as described above

4.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K. Johnson”, was not even legally motivated to set a simple “hearing” on a (TRO) Temporary Restrain order” during 2 ¾ moths timing lapse to protect the Plaintiff “Interest” in among other things (Arthur et al) scuttle of “physical documents”, records and secure the deposition conducted upon (Arthur Esq.)

(While the Plaintiff) herein (Hamilton II) watching the” mass fleeing of Defendants” from the Marine Building L.L.C.

before any Honorable Court Hearing dates, and the massive dumping of “tons of legal trash” on the ground by several of the fleeing defendants during a Federal Civil Court proceeding)

5.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K. Johnson”, was 100% “Motivated by (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (The Marine Building L.L.C. et al) “Hostile Ex-parte communication Complaints

By the Plaintiff media blitz counter attack of (Arthur et al) on the Backpag.com (Internet) posting by the Plaintiff herein A/k/a (Cmdr. Bluefin) on the Backpage.com

And The “Sherlock Holmes Mystery Writer”.

Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) “media blitz counter attack of (Arthur et al) , (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (The Marine Building L.L.C. et al) on the Backpag.com (Internet) as provided above

Did in “Facts and all circumstances” secure a quick with less notice a Court Hearing date to now discuss among other things (TRO) “Temporary Restrain order” of (Arthur et al) which The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge did not do on her on “Honorable harmony concurrence and accord”.

6.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K. Johnson”, blatting allowing” (Arthur Esq.) “direct attack” of the Plaintiff reputation in “official Court document(s) also bearing (Arthur Esq.) signature no-less;

With (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (The Marine Building L.L.C. et al) description in said libel documentation

“Stating” Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) is simply a (Derelict) for evening being in the current legal Federal pursuit obligations against other (Crooked Attorneys) as Plaintiff provided for both the U.S. Federal Court” and “Arthur et al” such findings in which the Plaintiff life is past threaten, to the point (2) Defendant(s) even refusal in appearance before a “Honorable Court of Law to discuss the particulars after Plaintiff completed a (Bluefin Inc.) Special Freelance investigator “i ntelligence agency ” personal and XXX personal consultation upon one “Attorney Antoine L. Freeman J.D. Esq.” And his “Clients special criminal actions” as described upon the old, sick, and helpless

Thus Bringing about the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) to these (Harris County) area in 2009 until the dust settle and said Defendant(s) “Attorney Antoine L. Freeman J.D. Esq.” And

his “Clients very humors refusal in appearance before a “Honorable U.S. Federal Court of Law” in Beaumont Texas to discuss the particulars

“But the Defendant (The United States of America) U.S. Federal Court here in (Houston Texas) is standing strong behind and quite bogus ” in support with (Arthur Esq.) “direct attack” of the Plaintiff reputation in “official Court document(s)”

Also bearing (Arthur Esq.) signature no-less “ Plaintiff “ herein (Hamilton II) is “100% standing Proof” a “Derelict” for being in any other “legal Civil Federal obligations “ before a ” Honorable Court of Law” provided the Plaintiff all of the needed support that the “The Defendant (The United States of America) is “100% in protection of the deposition of Arthur Esq.

7.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K. Johnson”, and (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (The Marine Building L.L.C. et al) all having full firsthand knowledge of the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) filing “Deposition evidence against one “Doctor Samuel Benjamin Magnus-Lawson M.D.” in Bob Casey” Honorable United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas with a “Sherlock Mystery Story” Case

of the: “The Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor” by the Plaintiff in which all the particulars are indeed facts’.

8.

The Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) Respectfully assert before this Honorable United States Federal Court that in addition to all of the “Aid and abet” in protection to Hiding & scuttle of records, documents, deposition evidence, and physical assets of one (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) by Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K. Johnson” the extreme (RICO) criminal particulars that are indeed facts’ against (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) was first put in a “Sherlock Holmes” Complaint, Manuscript and filed in U.S. Federal of the Defendant (The United States of America) and titled the “Sherlock Holmes Case of “The Talking Treasure Box”.

The Facts and particulars are involving “Historic Scrooge”, and “Charles Dickens” Christmas Carol” and the Deposition of (Arthur Esq.) is center around the solving of the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) “Sherlock Holmes Mystery”, furtherance in advance which (Andy Vickery) Attorney for “Christ Church Cathedral” already provided the Plaintiff full facts that the deposition having been completed on (Arthur Esq.)and quite very Civil in damaging,

9.

Since I Plaintiff (Hamilton II) provided “Christ Church Cathedral” “Legal Team” detail’s in the particulars of Plaintiff future Civil offense attack against against (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) in advance of (Arthur Esq.) being deposed under oath of a deposition leaving (Arthur Esq.) fully expose to the Plaintiff thus placing “Christ Church Cathedral” Legal Team” in a well place advantage position which in all “Facts and legal circumstance” brought about the non-suit filing by (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) to dismiss against “Christ Church Cathedral et al”.

10.

The Plaintiff Respectfully assert before the “Honorable Court” evidence of the Deposition of (Arthur Esq.) is the Center of all disputes “Meaning the second the deposition is made to light the truth is set free, which the Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) strongly conspire before hand to keep 100% conceal in Favor of (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) all being 99.9% (White) race against “The Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II” base solely upon his (Race) Negro “Nigger”,

The full facts of the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) support a Jury Trial, and The Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) having full criminal intentions in theft of a “Civil Jury” overdue rights to weight all facts and decide for them self on such damaging facts and circumstances as described in the Original Complaint, The First Amend Complaint, and final in the (2) Amend Complaint of the Plaintiff with now supported factual documents being provided by (Arthur et al) through “Trickery”.

11.

The Plaintiff Respectfully Assert before the Honorable Court, that the “Plaintiff “Sherlock Holmes Mystery story” Case of: The Talking Treasure Box against (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) having caused great Judicial following to keep under complete raps for the massive Fraudulent contents.

12.

The Collection of the Criminal Scuttle of the current physical legal documents by (Arthur et al), (Law Office of

Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) now place into Federal Court Records custody,

Were completed by the Plaintiff before the 14 day of February 2011, before The United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K. Johnson”, signature was upon the official order.

To include but not limited to Plaintiff assert before the “Honorable Court” that the day the ex-parte communication was made between the (Arthur et al) and United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K. Johnson”, in regards to the posting on Backpage.com , setting a hearing for a (TRO);

(Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) was working “overtime and quit secure in their choir” in “operation Federal scuttle”

Because they (Arthur et al) knew the Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K. Johnson”, civil ruling results

before hand that moment being in favor of ((Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) even before 2/7/2011 from the events of massive fleeing by (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al) after knowing Plaintiff is no longer a “Civil Threat”

13.

While the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) “Bluefin Inc.” “Completely watching” (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) and their furtherance completed their (RICO) criminal scheme

of things in scuttle legal documents acts & fleeing with relive, take pressure off, alleviated ease, as Plaintiff (Hamilton II) being at will himself, in picking through a massive pile of “Legal trash” behind the Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al with “Special Bonus Documents” contain the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) name on it with the hearing date of 2/7/2011 and the Invoice of The Marine Building L.L.C. rental Agreement and price listing (Among other Legal) documents Plaintiff having in his possession, custody, and control before the Defendant (The United States of America) United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Federal Magistrate Judge, “Nancy K. Johnson” big case fixing acts to dismissed the (RICO) claims against (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and (Marine building L.L.C. et al).

14.

The Defendant herein (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant herein (The State of Texas) (Judicial System) among other “Government Functions” continue in 2011 to be in power and in full charge under “racist segregationist laws” known as “Black Codes” govern (Slavery) over the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) “Intelligence” that the “Plaintiff (Hamilton II) not inborn with the ability to learn and think but that ability as improved by educations:

Thus Whites having superior intelligence and The Defendant herein (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant herein (The State of Texas) both (Judicial System) intent on securing “White Rule” under non disclosure extremist doctrine declaring Plaintiff (Hamilton II) civil effective measures as described under “Federal and State Constitution laws herein is fully null void and deem unconstitutional in a well strategy imposing measure intended to prevent a precise Equality between Plaintiff Hamilton II (Negro) ability to bring Civil Charges against a (Whiteman) (Arthur et al) by precise deliberately imposing

“Civil Genocide” upon the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) Negro (Nigger) with the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) fairness in suit in common law against a “Whiteman”

The Defendant (United States of America) population accounts for approximately 5% of the world’s population.

Yet, the Defendant (United States of America) holds 25% of the worlds prisoners in its prisons.

That makes the good old Defendant (U.S.A) the #1 prison nation in the world!

But, you see, that also makes the U.S.A. the #1 legal slave owner in the world…

The U.S. incarceration rate on June 30, 2009 was 748 inmates per 100,000 U.S. residents, or 0.75%.

(Negro) Blacks Americans contribute about half of all prison inmates when (Negro) Blacks Americans are only 13 percent of the Defendant (United States of America) population.

minorities are more likely to be executed than whites convicted of the same crime.

The purpose entering the civil justice system seeking equity and redress for damages during public “Civil Trial” is to ensure fairness, accuracy, and truthfulness.

Conclusion

The Defendant (United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) continue restraining the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) among other (Negro) African Americans whom won “Civil Right’s.

The doctrine of “absolute immunity” for Judges was passed by the Defendant (The United States of America) at the “exact moment” (Negro) Blacks African Americans won “Civil Right’s.

And this “Absolute Immunity” applies even when the Defendant (The United States of America) Judges are accused of acting “maliciously and “corruptly” secured by the Defendant (United States Supreme Court: Harlow v. Fitzgerald, Mareles v. Waco, and Pierson v. Ray

Negro (Nigger) within the defendant (The United States of America) having continue to in 2011 suffer wrongful incarceration than whites convicted of the same crime under abuse of doctrine of “absolute immunity” in suit in common law, the same still apply,

“Niggers need not apply” only (80) years prison term and the “lethal injection” is your civil future against a “Whiteman”

Cause of Action

The Plaintiff and Plaintiff's reincorporate everything from paragraph (1) through paragraph (14) as fully set-forth herein in for cause of damages:

Injury to Personal Reputation, Discrimination, Defamation, Fraud, Civil Conspiracies, Impeaching Honesty, Injury to Reputation, Imputation of Crime, Disease and Sexual Misconduct

Breach of contractual written agreement in the Defendant (The United State of America) and Co-Defendant (State of Texas) Constitution and all laws thereof to the stated said “effect that the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) was a free (Negro) slave”

and not subject to any of the current Laws of “Jim Crow” and “Black Codes” in the current time frame

in 2009, 2010, and 2011 as during the past when such activities was outlawed.

Abuse of Judicial Absolute Immunity

Abuse of Official Immunity

Aiding and abetting to commit A Criminal Enterprise in Racketeering against the rights, dignity and will of the Plaintiff

Obstruction of Justice, Obstruction of Criminal Investigation, Conspiracies to pursue the same Criminal Objective

Violation of Plaintiff (Hamilton II) Equal Protection under the Law

Violations under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization, Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents), Section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice),

Section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal (RICO) investigations), section 1956 (relating to the laundering of monetary instruments), Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. § 1030 in connection with all criminal (RICO) acts and actions, as described herein, and conspiracies to violate (RICO).

Multiple Judicial Court procedures of Schemes and Patterns to commit among other things: Mail and Wire Fraud as described herein, and conspiracies to violate (RICO). Aiding and abetting to commit A Criminal Enterprise in Racketeering against the rights, dignity and will of the Plaintiff to include

“Obstruction of Justice”, Falsification of Material facts, Conspiracies to pursue the same Criminal Objective,

Violation of the Plaintiff (Negro) herein (Hamilton II) civil rights protected by the Defendant (The United States of America and the Co-Defendant (State of Texas) Constitution

In Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II asking for relief before a Texas State District Court for unfair treatment of one “Whiteman” namely (Arthur et al) and (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) before a “Civil Court of Law.

Actual, accumulative, compensatory, consequential, continuing, expectation damages, foreseeable, future, land, hedonic, incidental, indeterminate, reparable, lawful, treble under (RICO), proximate, prospective, special, speculative, substantial, punitive, and permanent damages

Declaration Judgment by a “Jury” that each and every claim, accusation, assertion, contention and charges in all allegations as described fully herein against all Defendants, and their agents being entry into the action of

this cause in full favor of the Plaintiff Hamilton II (Negro) Black Africa American

The Plaintiff seeks “treble damages” under (RICO) Statue against all defendants herein

Plaintiff Awarded Compensations Claims for “serious past, present ,and future Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and Mental Anguish being imposed, tariff and levy both past, current, and future to include but not limited to for all of the Defendant and Co-defendant extreme and outrageous acts as described herein: