LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM ... · 07-11-2013 · review under CEQA...

AGENDA

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING Thursday, November 7, 2013 9:00 a.m.

Grace E. Simons Lodge 1025 Elysian Park Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90012

Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority (the “Authority”) AGENDA POSTED: November 4, 2013 Complete agendas are made available for review at the designated meeting location during normal business hours and may also be accessible on the Authority’s website at http://www.la-rics.org.

Members:

1. William T Fujioka, Chair, CEO, County of Los Angeles

2. Charles L. Beck, Vice Chair, Police Chief, City of Los Angeles

3. Mark R. Alexander, City Manager, representing the California Contract Cities Association

4. Leroy D. Baca, Sheriff, County of Los Angeles

5. Reginald Harrison, Deputy City Manager, City of Long Beach

6. LeRoy J. Jackson, City Manager, City of Torrance, representing At Large Seat

7. Dr. Mitchell H. Katz, Director, DHS, County of Los Angeles

8. Gerry F. Miller, Chief Legislative Analyst, City of Los Angeles

9. Daryl L. Osby, Fire Chief, County of Los Angeles

10. James G. Featherstone, Interim Fire Chief, City of Los Angeles

11. Donald Pedersen, Police Chief, City of Culver City, representing At Large Seat

12. Scott Pickwith, Police Chief, representing the Los Angeles County Police Chiefs Association

13. Kim Raney, Police Chief, City of Covina, representing At Large Seat

14. Bill Walker, Fire Chief, representing the Los Angeles Area Fire Chiefs Association

15. Miguel Santana, CAO, City of Los Angeles

16. Gregory L. Simay, Assistant General Manager, City of Burbank Water & Power, representing At Large Seat

17. Steven K. Zipperman, Police Chief, Los Angeles School Police Department

Officers:

1. Patrick Mallon, Executive Director

2. Wendy L. Watanabe, County of Los Angeles Auditor-Controller

3. Mark J. Saladino, County of Los Angeles Treasurer and Tax Collector

4. Patricia Saucedo, Board Secretary

Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority

AGENDA

November 7, 2013

NOTE: ACTION MAY BE TAKEN ON ANY ITEM IDENTIFIED ON THE AGENDA

I. CALL TO ORDER

II. ANNOUNCE QUORUM – Roll Call

III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (1)

1. October 3, 2013 Regular Meeting Minutes

Attachment: Item 1

IV. CONSENT CALENDAR – (None)

V. REPORTS (2–6)

2. Committee Reports

a. Legislative Committee – Daryl Osby

b. Finance Committee – No Report c. Operations Committee – No Report d. Technical Committee – No Report

3. Director’s Report – Pat Mallon

4. Project Manager’s Report – Pat Mallon

Attachment: Item 4

5. Grant Status Report – Pat Mallon

6. Long Term Evolution (LTE) Technology Presentation – Televate, LLC.

VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS (None)

VII. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS (7–8)

7. LMR Contract Amendment No. 3 – Pat Mallon

It is recommended that your Board: a. Make the following findings:


AGENDA

November 7, 2013

i. Find that approval and execution of the Amendment for the additional purchase and use of equipment in Phase 1 of Agreement No. LA-RICS 007 is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it is not a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378 and 15061(b)(3);

ii. Find that the additional purchase and use of selected equipment during Phase 1 of the Agreement, including the Site-On-Wheels, is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301, 15303, and 15311(c) for the reasons stated in this letter and in the record for the project; and

iii. Find that the purchase and use of the Site-On-Wheels is also exempt from review under CEQA as it is not a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b).

b. Delegate authority to the Executive Director, to execute Amendment Three to

Agreement No. LA-RICS 007 for the LMR System, substantially similar to the attached, exercising the Unilateral Option for all Work pertaining to the purchase and use of additional selected equipment in Phase 1 and the Site-On-Wheels, and to issue one or more Notices to Proceed to Motorola Solutions, Inc. ("Motorola") for this Work. Execution of Amendment Three shall increase the total contract amount by $1,285,230, increasing the Maximum Contract Sum from $280,354,954 to $281,640,184.

Attachment: Item 7

8. Permit to Enter County Sites for Locating Equipment Purchase – Phase 1

Authorize the Executive Director to complete negotiations and execute in substantially similar form, the attached Permit to Enter with the County of Los Angeles, to allow for the deployment of this equipment purchased in Phase 1 to occur at County sites.

Attachment: Item 8


AGENDA

November 7, 2013

VIII. CLOSED SESSION REPORT (9)

9. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (subdivision (d)(2) of Government Code Section 54956.9) Significant exposure to litigation (one case)

IX. MISCELLANEOUS – (None)

X. PUBLIC COMMENTS

XI. ITEMS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION BY THE BOARD

10. Project Funding

11. Project Risk Controls

XII. ADJOURNMENT and NEXT MEETING:

Thursday, December 5, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., at the Grace E. Simons Lodge.

BOARD MEETING INFORMATION

Members of the public are invited to address the LA-RICS Authority Board on any item on the agenda prior to action by the Board on that specific item. Members of the public may also address the Board on any matter within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board. The Board will entertain such comments during the Public Comment period. Public Comment will be limited to three (3) minutes per individual for each item addressed, unless there are more than ten (10) comment cards for each item, in which case the Public Comment will be limited to one (1) minute per individual. The aforementioned limitation may be waived by the Board’s Chair. (NOTE: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.3(b) the legislative body of a local agency may adopt reasonable regulations, including, but not limited to, regulations limiting the total amount of time allocated for public testimony on particular issues and for each individual speaker.) Members of the public who wish to address the Board are urged to complete a Speaker Card and submit it to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the public meeting. The cards are available in the meeting room. However, should a member of the public feel the need to address a matter while the meeting is in progress, a card may be submitted to the Board Secretary prior to final consideration of the matter. It is requested that individuals who require the services of a translator contact the Board Secretary no later than the day preceding the meeting. Whenever possible, a translator will be provided. Sign language interpreters, assistive listening devices, or other auxiliary aids and/or services may be provided upon request. To ensure availability, you are advised to make your request at least 72 hours prior to the meeting you wish to attend. (323) 881-8291 or (323) 881-8295 SI REQUIERE SERVICIOS DE TRADUCCION, FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR LA OFICINA CON 72 HORAS POR ANTICIPADO. The meeting is recorded, and the recording is kept for 30 days.

Board of Directors

MEETING MINUTES


HOA.1021826.1

October 3, 2013

Grace E. Simons Lodge 1025 Elysian Park Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90012

Board Members Present:

William “'Bill” T Fujioka Chair, CEO, County of Los Angeles

Brian Cummings, Fire Chief, City of Los Angeles Fire Department

Gerry F. Miller, Chief Legislative Analyst, City of Los Angeles

Daryl L. Osby, Fire Chief, County of Los Angeles

Bill Walker, Fire Chief, City of Beverly Hills, representing the Los Angeles Area Fire Chiefs Association

Mark R. Alexander, City Manager, City of La Cañada Flintridge, representing the Contract Cities Association

LeRoy J. Jackson, City Manager, City of Torrance, representing At Large Seat

Donald “Don” Pedersen, Police Chief, City of Culver City, representing At Large Seat

Gregory “Greg” L. Simay, Assistant General Manager, City of Burbank Water & Power, representing At Large Seat

Representatives For Board Members Present:

David Betkey, representing, Leroy “Lee” D. Baca, for the County of Los Angeles Sheriff Department

Cathy Chidester, representing Dr. Mitchell H. Katz, for the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services

Nancy L. Ramirez, representing Steven K. “Steve” Zipperman, for the Los Angeles School Police Department

Derek Webster, representing Kim Raney, City of Covina, At Large Seat

Officers Present:

Pat Mallon, LA-RICS Executive Director

Patricia Saucedo, Board Secretary

Absent:

Miguel Santana, CAO, City of Los Angeles

Charles “Charlie” L. Beck, Vice Chair, Police Chief, City of Los Angeles

Reginald “Reggie” Harrison, Deputy City Manager, City of Long Beach

Scott Pickwith, Police Chief, City of La Verne, representing the Los Angeles County Police Chiefs Association

Wendy L. Watanabe, Auditor-Controller, County of Los Angeles

Mark J. Saladino, Treasurer and Tax Collector, County of Los Angeles

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES


October 3, 2013

I. CALL TO ORDER

II. ANNOUNCE QUORUM – Roll Call

Chair Fujioka began the meeting promptly at 9:00 a.m., and acknowledged that a quorum was present. III.

IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – (1)

1. September 5, 2013 – Regular Meeting Minutes. MOTION APPROVED.

V. CONSENT CALENDAR – (None)

VI. REPORTS – (2–5)

2. Committee Reports

a. Finance Committee – Stephen Sotomayor Stephen Sotomayor, Chair of Finance Committee, stated the Finance Committee held a regular meeting and a special meeting since the last JPA meeting and recommends that the JPA accept services to assist the Finance Committee in developing a Funding Plan. This item will be discussed at a later point during the meeting.

b. Legislative Committee – Daryl Osby

Daryl Osby, Chair of Legislative Committee, provided an update at the September 5th meeting and had no new information to report today. The next Legislative Committee meeting is scheduled for October 16, 2013.

c. Operations Committee – No Report d. Technical Committee – No Report

3. Director’s Report – Pat Mallon

Executive Director Pat Mallon provided an update on the LTE Project. Proposals are due today at 2:00 p.m. The due date was delayed one week due to the number of questions relative to the RFP. In the interest of providing a sufficient period for the proposers to respond the proposal response time was extended by a week. We have a full team of Evaluators and they will begin that process this coming Monday (October 7, 2013).

Regarding the LMR Project, a Notice to Proceed was issued to Motorola for the Land Mobile Radio System. Motorola is aggressively pursuing site visits to develop the Project Descriptions. These descriptions are a critical element in the development of the CEQA analysis. An additional Notice to Proceed was issued for the acquisition of equipment approved by the Board on August 15, 2013. It was issued pursuant to the approval of a Sub-recipient Agreement by the Los Angeles City Council on Friday, September 27, 2013. Delivery of those items will be completed by December 31, 2013, and we will fully expend the UASI ’09 Grant allocation.

Site Access Agreements were sent to the City Managers of cities that have LMR and/or LTE sites with a request that they begin their review process. We’ve met with several City Managers and City Attorneys, and we anticipate being able to complete those meetings within the next few



October 3, 2013

weeks. The main question that has been asked is the cost of participation, and that will be discussed as part of the Funding Plan today.

We are also pursuing the assistance of an experienced firm to help develop a public outreach strategy for any public meetings that might be necessary as part of this site access process. That will be addressed as part of agenda Item 7.

Mr. Fujioka has selected three Board Members to serve on the Oversight Committee. They are Mr. Harrison from Long Beach; Mr. Miller from the City of Los Angeles; and, Mr. Fujioka. These members may appoint an alternate to ease the scheduling restrictions. I am hoping to be able to coordinate a meeting with that committee before the end of next week.

4. Project Manager’s Report – Pat Mallon

Executive Director Pat Mallon stated that the Jacobs report is included for your review.

Next month we will be including a status report from the LMR Contractor that will cover a progress update of the prior month.

Chairman Fujioka requested a response on a question raised by Chief Walker for a copy of the updated Site Maps for LMR and LTE towers. Pat Mallon stated that there are 232 LTE sites and we will provide a list to all Board Members by the end of the day. As part of the LTE process, in the initial one to two months, whoever the vendor is for that system will actually be going out and looking at each site and determining where on each site the best location is for that antenna. We do have to take into consideration the proximity on the location so that, as an example, if the site has open fields next to it, that could create a biological condition. We need to make sure that the contractor stays away from that. Chairman Fujioka stated, we’ve had a number of meetings with Cities within our County, if you can give us an update on how those meetings are going and how we’re progressing. Pat Mallon stated, so far we’ve met with almost 20 City Managers and their staff and as mentioned earlier. Their interest is in what the cost is and what their level of commitment will be. More specifically they want to know if they move forward with a site access agreement, are they buying into a huge financial commitment, and what is the timeline for the Site Access Agreements. I have informed them that, as part of the site access agreement approval process, each City has to have some form of a CEQA finding and that there may need to be coordination with the Authority re this finding.

On the LMR System, it’s a little more complicated because of the CEQA process, so we very well might end up having separate site access agreements for the LTE and the LMR sites. The other issue that comes up repeatedly is participation and we’ll be addressing this during the funding plan. The question is also asked if they have to be a member of the Authority. And if they are a member of the Authority, do they have to participate in both systems, as opposed to one. So as we move through the funding plan process, we anticipate there will be a number of additional meetings with City Managers and/or their representatives. We will be submitting a questionnaire to each of the Authority Members asking for input into what metrics they feel should be included with the funding plan.



October 3, 2013

Chairman Fujioka stated it’s apparent that we don’t have consistent and standard information available to our member cities. Because of issues that have been raised that really aren’t issues, it’s based on either the lack of information or just flat out misinformation. So what I’ve asked Pat to do, is to share with all of our members of this Authority a Fact Sheet that has questions and answers of basic facts associated with the project, so that all of our cities in L.A. County are operating on the same page . So we’ll be getting that together over the next few weeks. We’ll get it out to all Authority Members, just so we can get it out there. We know that a lot of you represent different agencies, but when we walk into one city, the biggest question is, how are we going to pay for this? And they have to understand that, where we are right now is different than what they remember four years ago and it’s not going to cost what we previously expected. So we have to address it, and the best way to do so is with very solid information that we’ll share with everyone.

Board Member Jackson asked for an update on questions that the City of Torrance provided on specific language of the agreement. Pat Mallon stated we met with the City of Torrance, and we have received a red-lined copy of the draft agreement. Rather than start with a blank piece of paper, and then try to negotiate forty or fifty different agreements, we put out a template. We’ve received some very good input from the City of Torrance. There were a couple of others Cities that provided feedback and we’ll be getting back in contact with your City staff, to get some kind of agreement on those.

Board Member Jackson asked a question regarding the CEQA procedure. Truc Moore, Counsel of the Authority, addressed this matter stating, as we move forward in finalizing various site access agreements we will work with the cities to help them facilitate the process through CEQA.

Board Member Simay asked a question that the JPA Counsel will need to look into. When the JPA was established we were just thinking LMR with a very modest data component. Then the opportunity came for a starter system on the LTE. Would an option to separate membership require change to the JPA? And, would that change require approval by the various City Councils that approved the original agreement? It is a question of what would be required if that is the direction they want to go. What mechanics would be involved. Chairman Fujioka requested a report back.

Amanda Drukker, Counsel of the Authority, stated, we are looking at that and will report back. Board Member Simay added, “I think it would be helpful if the cities had some idea of what the initial system would be capable of doing for them, and how this could be a topic for the funding plan.

Board Member Jackson stated, a question keeps coming up as to how the system itself will interface with the LTE system? Pat Mallon stated, in the initial role out, it would be similar to what you currently use today for your data stream to your police and fire units. They typically have an air card that is connected in the trunk of their car that allows them to hook to the dispatch system. This would provide as a replacement of that. Instead of subscribing through Verizon or AT&T or one of the commercial networks, you could subscribe through the LA-RICS System and get the same level of service. As the system and devices continue to be rolled out, it could expand to where your police and fire units use a single radio with both critical voice and data. Board Member Jackson stated, “And, as we go forward, we’ll have a comparison of our current provider



October 3, 2013

verses this provider, as to its reliability and capability?” Pat Mallon stated, “we are also looking at some roaming agreements as part of this system so that, if we move outside of an area where we’ve got robust LA-RICS coverage, users could roam into a commercial network to make up the lost coverage.”

5. Grant Status Report – Pat Mallon

Executive Director Pat Mallon stated agenda Item 5 is the Grant Status Report. The City Council from Los Angeles approved the ’09 Sub-recipient Agreement for UASI Funds. We have issued a NTP to Motorola to fully use those funds. Also, as reported at your last meeting, the LA City Grants Administrator advised that FEMA is not supportive of an extension of the UASI ’10 funds and it is now set to expire on March 31, 2014. We have developed options that should fully expend these funds before that date and we will be bringing that back to your Board for action at your November meeting.

Board Member Jackson asked, if the Federal closure has any impact on the Grant Funds? Pat Mallon stated, “No, we can continue moving forward with our activities without any interruption. What could result, if there is protracted delay in Washington DC, would be the delay in the reimbursement process. But, we don’t anticipate any significant invoices to be delivered with the next 60 to 90 days.”

VII. DISCUSSION ITEMS (None)

VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS (6–9)

6. Acceptance of Service Contributed by the County of Los Angeles – Funding Plan

a. It is recommended that your Board accept the contribution from the County of Los Angeles of the service of PMC, an independent consultant, for development of the LA-RICS funding plan.

Executive Director Pat Mallon stated that agenda Item 6 is the acceptance of services contributed by the County of Los Angeles for the development of a funding plan. The County provided the names of contractors some of which the Finance Committee interviewed. The Finance Committee approved the development of a scope statement in September 2013, which is attachment A to Item 6. This firm will help develop a project based research, that will include consideration of stake holders’ decision making processes, development of a fair share cost allocation, a financing plan, and attendance to some meetings, as I previously reported. The County will be contributing a not to exceed budget of $409,560 for this effort.

A motion was made by Member Simay, seconded by Member Jackson, hearing no objections.

MOTION APPROVED.



October 3, 2013

7. Jacobs’ Amendment #7 – Pat Mallon

Authorize the Executive Director to execute a contract amendment with Jacobs, substantially similar to the attached form, to:

a. Separate the Scope of Work into two separate projects, defined as the Land Mobile Radio (LMR) System project and the Long Term Evolution (LTE) System project; and,

b. Increase the maximum contract sum of by $4,889,427, to include new scope of work. Executive Director Mallon stated agenda Item 7 is to amend the Jacob’s Project Management contract. As you might recall, the Jacob’s team was brought on board in March 2012. Since that time, there have been a number of changes that have occurred due to the impact of H.R. 3630. With the cancellation of our second procurement we’ve pulled some hours forward from future phases into Phase 0. An example of this is the frequency study completed to analyze if we could build entirely on the 700 and 800 MHz spectrum. Amendment number 3 was approved by the Board for the development of the third RFP for the LMR System. Since that time, we now have the contract in place with Motorola. There is an extension of time of about 18 months. We are also including an allowance for environmental services because before construction at each site we have to do a site inspection so that we’re not impacting any biological issues. And there is also an allocation for the development of a public outreach program. The maximum contract increase will be $4,889,427. Chairman Fujioka asked “What time period is the amendment for?” Pat Mallon stated, this will be for a total of 17 months. The original contract was for four years, we’ve lost a year and a half. Board Member Jackson asked if we have the funding available for this. Pat Mallon stated, this would be through the SHSGP and UASI funds. Board Member Jackson asked, and how much of our grant funds is consumed then, for this purpose as compared to the actual build out? Pat Mallon stated, their total contract value would be $27,307,585, for both projects. The LMR system total contract is $280 million. And we don’t know what the proposal prices are for the LTE system yet. Board Member Jackson asked, how will you split the contract, in essence? Pat Mallon stated, it’s pretty close to 50/50, although there is a significant level of effort on the LTE system because we’re building 232 sites within the next 20 months. . After August 15, 2015, it will be entirely for the LMR system. Some of the funds for the Project Management are covered under the BTOP Grant, and some of them are covered under the UASI and SHSGP for the LMR side. MOTION APPROVED.

8. Election of At-Large Members – Pat Mallon

It is recommended that your Board either:

a. Temporarily suspend Section 3.01 of the Authority's Bylaws and extend the term of the current At-Large Director and Alternate Director seats to June 5, 2014 to allow for continued consistency in the make-up of the Authority's Board to address and complete the LTE procurement and related issues for a Funding Plan;

OR,



October 3, 2013

b. Announce that the Board meeting to be held on April 3, 2014 as date on which the mail-in ballot election of the At-Large Director and Alternate Director seats shall be conducted.

Executive Director Pat Mallon stated agenda Item 8 is regarding election of the At-Large Board Members. The last action by this Board was to look into an election at the April 3, 2014 meeting. In order to meet the six-month notice requirement, we need to begin that process today. Or, in the interest of having consistency of Board Members through the execution of the LTE contract, an alternative would be to extend the elections for an additional three months to allow the existing Board, who has been through the procurement process, to remain in place until we have the LTE contract executed.

Chairman Fujioka stated, I think given where we’re at and the need for consistency, that we have that minor extension. Having the same people with us through the last couple of years, who understand what we are trying to do would be important. And, so the extension would be for how many months? Pat Mallon stated, three more months.

Board Member Alexander stated, for clarification, I’m wondering if recommendation 8a is necessary. My recollection was that at one point this Board had adopted a motion and it basically said that the membership would continue until replacements were selected. So do we need to suspend the Bylaws, if that’s already in place? Amanda Drukker stated, at one point this Board adopted a motion. But, we’ve taken interim steps to suspend the Bylaws to a specific date since that motion. But the Board could adopt a motion today that suspended the Bylaws until replacements were selected, if that is what the Board wanted to do.

Board Member Alexander stated, I think it is probably reasonable to have a date so that we are always looking at this issue, but maybe three months isn’t long enough. Maybe we ought to be looking at something a little further down the line. Chairman stated, I will entertain an amended motion if you would like.

Board Member Simay stated, from the point of view from the Project Management when would we be through some of the most critical phases so that if there was a significant transition, you wouldn’t be putting the newbies right in the middle of a lot of decisions that would require a lot of familiarity. Operationally when would, assuming the schedule continues as planned? Pat Mallon stated, we feel that by June 2013, we should have an executed contract for the LTE System. That seems to be the critical nature where bringing some new board members up to speed would create some lack of consistency. That’s why we selected the June date. But it’s clearly, your Board’s discretion. We do need to set the election date six months ahead of time. So, as Mr. Alexander was suggesting, we could just bring this item back in December. Board Member Alexander stated, inevitably there are delays, and after implementation hopefully by June there may be some residual issues that need to be dealt with by experienced Board Members, may I suggest maybe a year instead of June? Pat Mallon stated, we would be bringing this item back to you a year from today, to establish an election for April 2015.

Chairman Fujioka stated, so extend a contract (the Bylaws) through October 2014. Amanda Drukker stated, I think Mr. Alexander is suggesting through April 2015. Pat Mallon stated whenever your Board meeting is in April 2015. Chairman Fujioka stated, okay, April 2015. Pat Mallon stated, we would be bringing the matter back to you on October 2014, for action of establishment for Election in April 2015. Chairman Fujioka stated, okay, well make your motion and we will have a discussion or we’ll move it. Board Member Alexander stated, I move that we temporarily suspend Section 3.01 of the Authority’s Bylaws and extend the term of the current At-Large Directors and Alternate Director’s seats to this Board’s regular meeting in April 2015, to allow for continued consistency in the make-up of the Authority’s Board to address and complete the LTE procurement and related issues for a funding plan. Chairman Fujioka stated, okay, we



October 3, 2013

have an amended motion on the table. Is there a second? The motion was seconded by Daryl Osby. Board Members Simay Jackson abstained from this motion.

Temporarily suspend Section 3.01 of the Authority's Bylaws and extend the term of the current At-Large Director and Alternate Director seats to this Board's regular meeting in April 2015 to allow for continued consistency in the make-up of the Authority's Board to address and complete the LTE procurement and related issues for a Funding Plan.

MOTION APPROVED AS AMENDED.

9. California Joint Powers Insurance Authority – Pat Mallon

It is recommended that your Board: Designate a Board Member to serve as the appointee to represent the Authority on the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) and the Executive Director to serve as the alternate appointee, all in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 of the CJPIA. Executive Director Pat Mallon stated, the Joint Powers Insurance Authority in complying with their requirements for participation, the CJPIA is asking this Board to identify a member of the Board to sit as representative on the CJPIA for the LA-RICS Authority, as well as to identify an Alternate appointee staff suggested that I be the alternate appointee. We are requesting your designation of an Authority member to sit as a LA-RICS Representative for the CJPIA. Chairman Fujioka asked the Board Members, if there any volunteers who would like to assume this responsibility? Board Member Alexander stated, Mr. Chair, if there is no one else interested, I have an established relationship with the same CJPIA, and would be happy to represent the Board in that capacity. Chairman Fujioka stated, okay. We have a motion, designating Mark Alexander to be our representative. MOTION APPROVED

IX. CLOSED SESSION REPORT – (None)

X. MISCELLANEOUS – (None)

XI. PUBLIC COMMENTS

XII. ITEMS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION BY THE BOARD

10. Project Funding

11. Project Risk Controls

XIII. ADJOURNMENT

Chair Fujioka stated our next meeting is scheduled for November 7, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. at this facility. Board Member Pedersen asked, Mr. Chair, one thing, if I could just verify. I think I heard that the Fact Sheet would take about two to three weeks? Is that right? Pat Mallon stated, we will be using, with the approval of agenda Item 7, a public outreach firm. The Fact Sheet will be there first task. Board Member Pedersen stated, on behalf of the independent cities, not only is there a lack of information, but the misinformation that the Chair alluded to is rampant. And we need to get on that as soon as possible, I believe. Chairman Fujioka stated we are going to get a draft prepared this week, by mid next week, I



October 3, 2013

want the draft sent out to all the Board Members to make sure we are comfortable with it, once we have your approval were going to get it out to all the Cities. And I’ll sent it out to the City Managers, and then to our Police and Fire Associations and ask you to send it out the Head of those Associations and to the Fire and Police Chiefs in the County. So we take the administrative side by sending it through their peers. I am sensitive to that, because I have heard a couple of things and I’ll go to an event and someone will walk up to me, a peer and will say Bill I’ve heard this. I respond, no that’s not true. So it begs for more consistent information. Board Member Jackson stated, I would really like also to have a discussion on how the cell system of the data system will work for the users, the end users. Just what comes out of the system for the end users, and what they have to do in order to interface with that. You have mentioned the cards, and other things. I’d like to see more explanation particularly in emergency situations of how it will work? Pat Mallon stated, certainly, we will have our Consultant,Televate, come to the next meeting to make a presentation to you to give you a class in LTE 101. Chairman Fujioka stated, ideally, what I think we should do at this juncture, because we have a major milestone getting the contract into place. We’ll have the first Fact Sheet, but subsequently, we should agree on a timeline to send regular reports out, that should include our progress, where we’re at, what we’re doing in DC or locally. And we send it out again, to the three entities, the City Managers, the Police Chiefs, the Fire Chiefs. So they are used to seeing something on a regularly scheduled basis. And we can talk about how frequent that would be. Its labor intensive and it may involve in the need for additional resources to do that. But communication, at this point, is paramount. So we deal with the labor requirements, but we will get the information out. I think it would be extremely important and very, very well received. Chair Fujioka stated, if there is nothing else, this meeting is adjourned.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Events of 9-11-01 have highlighted the need for first

responders to be able to communicate with each other.

Emergency communications primarily address local

jurisdictional needs. Most agencies utilize separate radio

towers and equipment, often co-located as seen here, and

separate radio frequencies.

Currently, there is duplication of costs and first

responders cannot communicate with each other. Many

legacy systems around the County are obsolete and well

beyond their useful life. The LA-RICS Project Vision is to

construct, own, operate, and maintain a regional,

interoperable public safety radio system. The program will

establish a County-wide public safety wireless voice and

data radio system for all first and secondary responders.

Existing radio frequencies will be pooled and the current

infrastructure utilized wherever practical. New FCC

licensed broadband spectrum will be utilized.

Design, construction, and deployment of two County-wide

systems (1) Land Mobile Radio (LMR) voice network will

utilize a pool of 88 existing communications sites and (2)

Long Term Evolution (LTE) broadband data network will

utilize a pool of 232 existing communications sites. Both

systems will comply with CEQA and NEPA standards.

Project and Construction Management Services will

provide network, infrastructure, project, and advisory

services across 5 program phases for each of the LMR

and LTE projects:

Phase 1 - System design

Phase 2 - Site construction and modification

Phase 3 - Supply telecommunication system

components

Phase 4 - Telecommunications system

implementation

Phase 5 - Telecommunications system maintenance

Monthly Report No. 18

For October, 2013

Submitted October 29, 2013

Los Angeles Regional

Interoperable Communications System

Confidentiality Notice: This document may contain confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it was

addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this report is strictly

prohibited. This document is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521 and is legally protected.

©Copyright 2013 LA-RICS Authority. All Rights Reserved

Location:

2525 Corporate Place, Suite 200

Monterey Park, CA 91754

Authority:

Los Angeles Regional Interoperable

Communications System

Management:

LA-RICS Project Team

Consultant:

Jacobs Program Management Company

Communications Vendor:

LMR - Motorola Solutions, Inc.

LTE - TBD

AGENDA ITEM 4

RISK REGISTER

PROGRAM DASHBOARD

1. COMPLETED

2. IN WORK

3. IN WORK

4. PLANNED

1. LTE RFP RE-WRITE

2. LMR PH1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

3. LTE EVALUATIONS

4. LTE NEGOTIATIONS

ITEM STATUS DUE DATE

1. AUGUST, 2013

2. DECEMBER, 2013

3. NOVEMBER, 2013

4. DECEMBER, 2013

ACTIVITIES STATUS

AGENDA ITEM 4

LA-RICS MASTER CALENDAR

AGENDA ITEM 4

LTE UPDATES LMR UPDATES

LTE SITES/CIVIL

• To be reported following the LTE vendor

selection.

LMR SITES/CIVIL

• Site visits to all LMR sites are complete

• 23 additional Project Descriptions will be

completed in November.

• Conducting site-by-site analysis of activities

required to construct/modify each site.

• Preliminary design phase has started and

construction documents will be prepared upon

acceptance of the final Project Description

Packages

Page 4

LMR TECHNOLOGY & DELIVERABLES

• Weekly Status Reviews (WSR) will be conducted

on Tuesdays from 1000 - 1200.

• Weekly LMR Site Meetings will be conducted on

Tuesdays from 1300—1500.

• Weekly LMR System Design Engineering Work

Sessions will be conducted on Wednesdays from

1300—1500.

• Monthly Status Reviews (MSR) will be conducted

on the last Wednesday of each month from 1300 -

1500.

Deliverables

Received initial drafts of the following documents:

• Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)

• Value Engineering Plan (VEP)

• Risk Management Plan (RMP)

• Q/A Plan

• Change Control Process (CCP)

• Change Order Management (COM)

• Project Management Staff Plan

• Draft Weekly Status Report

• Draft Monthly Status Report

LTE TECHNOLOGY

• Working through LTE procurement process.

AGENDA ITEM 4

LA-RICS MASTER SCHEDULE

AGENDA ITEM 4

LA-RICS DELIVERABLE SCHEDULE

AGENDA ITEM 4

Monthly Report #2

Repor�ng Period: 9/16/13 thru 10/18/13

Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communica�ons

System (LA-RICS) - Land Mobile Radio System

Motorola Solu�ons, Inc.

Page 7 LA-RICS LMR Monthly Report #2 – 9/16/13 thru 10/18/13 © Copyright 2013, LA-RICS Authority. All Rights Reserved.

AGENDA ITEM 4

TableofContents

1. Execu)ve Summary ...................................................................................................................................3

2. Project Status.............................................................................................................................................5

2.1 Tasks In Progress and Completed ........................................................................................................5

2.3 Tasks Planned for Next Period (10/21/13 thru 11/15/13) ..................................................................6

2.5. Authority Look-Ahead Tasks (120-Day) ..............................................................................................7

3. Project Risk Register ..................................................................................................................................8

4. Areas of Concern .......................................................................................................................................8

5. Disputes and Claims ..................................................................................................................................8

6. Financial Status ..........................................................................................................................................9

7. LA-RICS Master Schedule ...........................................................................................................................9


AGENDA ITEM 4

1.ExecutiveSummary

The Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communica)ons System Land Mobile Radio (LA-RICS LMR) program consists of the

following five (5) phases; Phase 1 LMR System Design, Phase 2 LMR Site Construc)on and Site Modifica)on, Phase 3 Sup-

ply LMR System Components, Phase 4 LMR System Implementa)on, and Phase 5 LMR System Maintenance. Phases 1-4

span over a five (5) year period which includes one (1) year of system warranty. Phase 5 provides the Authority with

fi=een (15) one year op)ons for Motorola to provide system monitoring and maintenance services.

The LA-RICS LMR program is currently in Phase 1 LMR System Design. The first No)ce To Proceed was issued on 9/9/13 to

ini)ate the project and authorize work for the system Design related services in Phase 1. The second No)ce To Proceed

was issued on 9/27/13 to ini)ate the design and implementa)on of the ini)al deployment of the LMR system termed

“Early Equipment”. No)ce To Proceeds 1 and 2 authorizes all of the work iden)fied in Phase 1.

This month’s report for the LA-RICS LMR program covers the repor)ng period from 9/16/13 through 10/18/13. As of this

repor)ng period Phase 1 is 14% complete. The primary ac)vi)es for this period include:

• Project Management Plans development (22% Complete)

Development of 14 management plans defining the approach and methodology that will be used to manage

the work required to complete all the Phases in the Program

• LA-RICS Deliverables - Authority Site Access Agreements (on going)

Authority’s efforts to develop and execute the applicable site access agreements for the required sites in the

LMR design.

• Integrated Master Schedule development (45% Complete)

The development and on-going updates of the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS). The LMR IMS will be inte-

grated into the Authority’s overall LA-RICS IMS program.

• “Early Equipment” design, procurement and prepara)on (13%)

Early Equipment is a subset of the LMR system that will be implemented in the early stages of the LMR pro-

gram. This subset of the LMR system will allow the Authority to evaluate the technology that will be de-

ployed and access any poten)al changes to exis)ng opera)onal policies.

• Project Descrip)ons development (45% Complete)

Project Descrip)ons are site reports depic)ng the proposed site modifica)on criteria required to support the

contracted system design. These reports will be used by the Authority and its environmental consults to

evaluate and prepare the necessary reports for the EHP/NEPA and CEQA processes. The Project Descrip)ons

accounted for the majority of ac)vity during this repor)ng period.

LMR System Design (3% Complete)

The LMR System Design is a compila)on of documents that will define the architecture, func)onality and performance of

all of the subsystems that make up the en)re LMR system. It includes all aspects of the system including performance

criteria, reliability levels and tes)ng procedures. Ini)al system design and coordina)on ac)vity began this period and will

become the primary effort in Phase 1 in the coming months.

The program is currently on schedule and there were no major risks events and or ac)vi)es that occurred during the re-

por)ng period that caused a delay in the program.


AGENDA ITEM 4

The following table provides a dashboard snapshot of the projects’ health signs.

Page 10

LMR Project Dashboard

Category Ra�ng Change Comments

Schedule Currently on schedule

Quality No quality issues to report

Risk Risk items have been iden)fied regarding; Spectrum, Site Access

Agreements, Site Condi)ons, and CEQA/NEPA Process

Scope Poten)al scope impacts based on exis)ng site condi)ons

Budget Currently within budget

LA-RICS LMR Monthly Report #2 – 9/16/13 thru 10/18/13 © Copyright 2013, LA-RICS Authority. All Rights Reserved.

AGENDA ITEM 4

2.ProjectStatusThe following sec)ons iden)fy task ac)vity during the repor)ng period and the planned ac)vi)es for the next repor)ng

period.

2.1TasksInProgressandCompleted

The following depict the task ac)vity that occurred during the current repor)ng period.

Ac�vity Name Ac�vity Status

Project Management Plans

Create and Deliver Overview and Scope In Process

LA-RICS Reviews Ini)al PM Staffing Plan In Process

Develop and Deliver Communica)on Plan In Process

Create and Deliver Documenta)on Plan In Process

LA-RICS Reviews Ini)al Quality Control Plan In Process

LA-RICS Reviews Ini)al Change Order Process/Change Management Plan In Process

Update Risk Management Plan with LA-RICS comments In Process

Create and Deliver Project Management Staffing Plan Completed

LA-RICS Reviews Ini)al IMS Completed

Create and Deliver Quality Control Plan Completed

Create and Deliver Change Order Process/Change Management Plan Completed

LA-RICS Reviews Ini)al Risk Management Plan Completed

LA-RICS Deliverables

Lease Nego)a)ons & Site Access Use Agreement In Process

Early Equipment

Design & Manufacturing In Process

Project Descrip�ons

Dra=ing and Produc)on In Process

Delivery of Project Descrip)ons In Process

LA-RICS Review and Provide Comments In Process

Field Reconnaissance – 73 Sites Completed

Design Review

DTVRS - Develop detail design framework In Process

ACVRS - Develop detail design framework In Process

LARTCS - Develop detail design framework In Process

NMDN - Develop detail design framework In Process

Consoles - Develop detail design framework In Process

Microwave - Develop detail design framework In Process

Inventory and Maintenance Tracking Subsystem Descrip)on In Process


AGENDA ITEM 4

2.3TasksPlannedforNextPeriod(10/21/13thru11/15/13)

The following depict the task ac)vity that is planned for the next repor)ng period.

Ac�vity Name Planned Status


Create and Deliver Overview and Scope On Going

LA-RICS Reviews Ini)al PM Staffing Plan On Going

Create and Deliver Communica)on Plan On Going

Create and Deliver Documenta)on Plan On Going

LA-RICS Reviews Ini)al Quality Control Plan On Going

LA-RICS Reviews Ini)al Change Order Process/Change Management Plan On Going

Create and Deliver Overview and Scope On Going

LA-RICS Reviews Ini)al PM Staffing Plan On Going

LA-RICS Reviews Ini)al Overview and Scope Start

LA-RICS Reviews Ini)al Communica)on Plan Start

LA-RICS Reviews Ini)al Documenta)on Plan Start

LA-RICS Reviews Ini)al Quality Control Plan On Going

LA-RICS Approve Risk Management Plan Start

LA-RICS Reviews Baseline IMS On Going


Lease Nego)a)ons & Site Access Use Agreement On Going

Access to Core Sites Start

Early Equipment

Design & Manufacturing On Plan

Ship to Staging Start

Frequency Applica)on Start


Dra=ing and Produc)on On Going

Delivery of Project Descrip)ons On Going

LA-RICS Review and Provide Comments On Going

Environmental Review & Documenta�on (Authority)

Environmental Consultant Ini)ates CEQA & NEPA Analysis Start

Prepare Preliminary Dra= EHP/NEPA Form Start

Design Review

DTVRS - Develop detail design framework On Going

ACVRS - Develop detail design framework On Going

LARTCS - Develop detail design framework On Going

NMDN - Develop detail design framework On Going

Consoles - Develop detail design framework On Going

Microwave - Develop detail design framework On Going

Inventory and Maintenance Tracking Subsystem Descrip)on On Going


AGENDA ITEM 4

2.5.AuthorityLook-AheadTasks(120-Day)

For the Authority planning purposes the following table provides a one hundred twenty (120) Day look-ahead of the Au-

thority-specific ac)vi)es to conduct coordina)on, inspec)ons, approvals, consents, and or provide decisions necessary

from the Authority to facilitate Contractor's progress.


Ac�vity Name


Staffing Plan

Overview and Scope

Communica)on Plan

Integrated Master Schedule

Documenta)on Plan

Quality Control Plan

Change Order Management Plan

Risk Management Plan


Lease Nego)a)ons & Site Access Use Agreement

LA-RICS Provides Access to Core Sites

Early Equipment

FCC Applica)on Review

Customer FATP

Receive & Inventory

LA-RICS Completes Site Readiness

LA-RICs Provides Backhaul Connec)vity from sites to Core


LA-RICS Review & Provide Comments

LA-RICS Review & Approve sets

Environmental Review & Documenta�on (Authority)

CEQA Exemp)on Applicability & Eligibility Screening & Assessment

Environmental Consultant Performs CEQA Environmental Review & Prepares Dra= CEQA Determina)on

Lead Agency CEQA Determina)on

Consult Federal Agency and Prepare Dra= NEPA Document

Prepare NEPA Document

Submit Final EHP & NEPA Document

Federal Lead Agency NEPA Determina)on

Design Review

A&E Submit for LA-RICs Review & Comments (16 sites)

Phase 1b Submit Required Permits and Approvals

See Environmental Review & Documenta)on tasks above

AGENDA ITEM 4

3.ProjectRiskRegister

4.AreasofConcernThis sec)on describes any events and or circumstances of which the Contractor is aware that has delayed or may delay

project ac)vi)es and what correc)ve or remedial ac)ons was taken or will be taken to resolve the issue. Outstanding

Issues Log (the “OIL Log”) entries are also tabulated and monitored in this sec)on. “Oil Log” items include, for example,

sequencing, infrastructure, site access, coordina)on issues, conges)on of workers and equipment, )me requirements for

design, procurement, and installa)on.

5.DisputesandClaims

This sec)on describes any disputes, poten)al claims, and claims made during the repor)ng period.

Title Assigned Impact Risk Descrip�on Status

Site Condi)on Changes Authority High Site condi)on differences from RFP to current condi-

)on may impact ability to implement planned instal-

la)ons and delay or require changes to LMR design

(e.g. coverage, backhaul, etc.)

Ac)ve

CEQA/NEPA Process Authority High The individual or collec)ve determina)on of envi-

ronmental impacts or mi)ga)ons may impact site

work or even site viability.

Ac)ve

Site Access Agreements Authority High Lease holders approvals are needed in order to im-

plement LA-RICS improvements at sites.

Ac)ve

Spectrum Availability,

700 MHz

Authority High Lack of frequencies may impact coverage and/or site

viability, necessita)ng design changes.

Ac)ve

ID Event / Circumstance Remedial Ac�on Taken or Required

02-01 Early construc)on of some sites Authority determina)on if construc)on of some sites can be

expedited by February 2014.

02-02 Design process delays due to changes in site

condi)ons

Authority and MSI to mutually determine site layout, tower

availability and shelter availability by 12/9/13 to keep system

design ac)vi)es on plan.

Dispute / Claim / Poten�al Claim Status / Ac�ons Resolu�on Date

None to report this period


AGENDA ITEM 4

6.FinancialStatusThe following represents the invoice payments that were completed during the repor)ng period and the remaining

amount to be invoiced and paid.

7.LA-RICSMasterScheduleThe following is an execu)ve view depic)ng the status of the primary ac)vi)es at the comple)on of this repor)ng period.

Invoice Payment Category Invoice Payment Totals

Contract Sum Full Payable Amount (Phase 1) $ 24,135,501

Cumula)ve Invoice Payments from Last Report ($ 0 )

Total Invoice Payments This Period ($ 0 )

Remaining Amount to be Paid $ 24,135,501

LA-RICS LMR Monthly Report #2 – 9/16/13 thru 10/18/13 © Copyright 2013, LA-RICS Authority. All Rights Reserved.

AGENDA ITEM 4

LA-RICS LMR Monthly Report #2 – 9/16/13 thru

10/18/13 Page 16 AGENDA ITEM 4

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY 2525 Corporate Place, Suite 200 Monterey Park, California 91754 (323) 881-8291

PATRICK J. MALLON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

AGENDA ITEM 7

November 7, 2013 Board of Directors Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority (the "Authority") Dear Directors:

APPROVE AMENDMENT THREE FOR AGREEMENT NO. LA-RICS 007 FOR LOS

ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM ("LA-RICS") – LAND MOBILE RADIO SYSTEM

SUBJECT Board approval is requested to amend Agreement No. LA-RICS 007 Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communication System ("LA-RICS") – Land Mobile Radio ("LMR") System to purchase additional equipment in Phase 1 and related services, and to increase the Maximum Contract Sum by $1,285,230 to allow for the purchase of a Site-On-Wheels and other related equipment. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR BOARD: 1. Make the following findings:

(a) Find that approval and execution of the Amendment for the additional purchase and use of equipment in Phase 1 of Agreement No. LA-RICS 007 is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it is not a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378 and 15061(b)(3);

(b) Find that the additional purchase and use of selected equipment during Phase 1

of the Agreement, including the Site-On-Wheels, is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301, 15303, and 15311(c) for the reasons stated in this letter and in the record for the project; and

(c) Find that the purchase and use of the Site-On-Wheels is also exempt from

review under CEQA as it is not a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b).

2. Delegate authority to the Executive Director, to execute Amendment Three to Agreement

No. LA-RICS 007 for the LMR System, substantially similar to the attached, exercising the Unilateral Option for all Work pertaining to the purchase and use of additional selected equipment in Phase 1 and the Site-On-Wheels, and to issue one or more

LA-RICS Board of Directors November 7, 2013 Page 2

Notices to Proceed to Motorola Solutions, Inc. ("Motorola") for this Work. Execution of Amendment Three shall increase the total contract amount by $1,285,230, increasing the Maximum Contract Sum from $280,354,954 to $281,640,184.

PURPOSE/JUSTIFICATION OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approval of the recommended actions will authorize the Executive Director or his designee on behalf of the Authority, to purchase and use selected equipment and procure services required for the deployment of such equipment during Phase 1. Additionally, these actions will find that the purchase and use of selected equipment during Phase 1 is not a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378 and 15061(b)(3), and categorically exempt from CEQA under the State CEQA Guidelines 15301, 15303, and 15311(c),. BACKGROUND The Authority has a remaining $5,647,911 million in 2010 Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI '10) grant funds that it must spend by March 2014. If these UASI '10 funds are not spent, the Authority will lose these funds. To facilitate the spend of these UASI '10 grant funds, the Authority would like to (1) purchase and use in Phase 1, additional equipment and related services originally scheduled to be purchased and performed in Phases 3 and 4 of Agreement No. LA-RICS 007 for the LMR System; (2) purchase and use of additional minor equipment needed for the first core purchased in Amendment One approved by the Board on August 15, 2013; and (3) purchase and use of a Site-on-Wheels. All equipment purchases and work will be performed under Agreement No. LA-RICS 007 for the LMR System with Motorola. With respect to Item (1)—the purchase and use in Phase 1 of additional equipment and related services originally scheduled to be purchased and performed in Phases 3 and 4—the Authority will purchase radio flash upgrade kits, a second core that will be located at an existing City of Los Angeles telecommunications facility, related testing and staging work, and a performance bond for this Work as required by the granting agency. The total for this Work is $4,362,681, and will require no additional monetary increase to the Agreement given the Work was already provided for in the current Agreement. With respect to Item (2)—the purchase and use of additional minor equipment needed for the first core purchased in Amendment One approved by the Board on August 15, 2013—another $66,534 in interface equipment, and minor electrical and FCC licensing Work is needed for the first core. The first core will be located at an existing County of Los Angeles telecommunications facility. With respect to Item (3)—the purchase and use of a Site-On-Wheels—an additional $1,218,696 increase to the Agreement is needed to cover this purchase. The Site-On-Wheels, which is a mobile shelter, will have a number of important uses, including providing supplemental coverage during emergency situations for Authority members; temporary replacement coverage when the emergency situations result in loss of a communications site; additional capacity and coverage for Authority members with compatible P25 subscriber equipment, for use during special events (law enforcement working a concert or sporting event that may need additional coverage); and temporary replacement coverage when an LA-RICS site is being constructed upgraded or modified as part of the LMR System or Public Safety Broadband Network (PSBN). The mobile


shelter can be connected to vehicles owned by the Authority's members. The $1,218,696 will cover the cost of the Site-On-Wheels, which includes the mobile shelter, repeater equipment, core licenses and related services for this Work. The additional increase for Items (2) and (3) result in the requested $1,285,230 set forth in Amendment Three, that will increase the Maximum Contract Sum from $280,354,954 to $281,640,184. FISCAL IMPACT/FINANCING The work to be performed under Amendment Three shall be fully reimbursed by the 2010 Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) grant. This grant is fully funded by the Department of Homeland Security through CalEMA. There is no matching fund requirement. FACTS AND PROVISIONS/LEGAL REQUIREMENT The Authority’s counsel has reviewed the recommended actions. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION The Authority’s purchase and use of selected equipment for Items (1) and (2) above during Phase 1 in existing telecommunication facilities is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA under State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301(a) and 15303. The purchase and use of this equipment involves negligible or no expansion of an existing use. Based on the LMR System records, the equipment will not be installed in sensitive environments, and, as to all exemptions cited there are no cumulative impacts, unusual circumstances or other limiting factors as set forth in Section 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would make the exemptions inapplicable. The Authority will also work with the granting agency regarding any NEPA issues. This equipment will be used or stationed at existing telecommunication facilities owned by the County and City of Los Angeles. Other telecommunication equipment currently in use by the County and City is also housed at these facilities. The selected equipment will either be housed internally in the equipment shelter at these facilities, or stationed in the same facilities, and the work required to use the equipment is done internally inside the equipment shelter. The second core, in combination with the first core already approved for purchase by the Board in Amendment No. 1, will assist in providing reliable wireless communications for Authority member agencies, including for training end users; serving as a training ground for technical personnel; providing for radio channel congestion relief for non-critical radio traffic; allowing for dual band operation proof-of-concept and resiliency; providing for survivability and disaster recovery capabilities; and allowing for interoperability with public safety agencies. The equipment in Items (1) and (2) above were selected for purchase and use in Phase 1 due to its flexibility — it is appropriate for use with the proposed LMR System and other existing systems of the Authority's member agencies, and has independent utility apart from the LMR System. In addition, use of this equipment involves negligible to no expansion of an existing use. With respect to Item (3) discussed above, the purchase and use of the Site-On-Wheels is not a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b), and is also categorically


exempt from the provisions of CEQA under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15311(c). The Site-On-Wheels is a continuing equipment purchase of supplies for the Authority and its' member agencies use. Additionally, the Site-On-Wheels is mobile and will be used temporarily at various sites from time to time throughout the County for additional coverage and capacity, including at public facilities and stadiums. Upon the Board's approval of the recommended actions, the Authority will file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk in accordance with Section 15062 of the State CEQA Guidelines. CONCLUSION Upon the Board's approval, the Executive Director, or his designee, will have delegated authority to proceed in the manner as described in the recommended actions contained in this letter. Respectfully submitted, PATRICK J. MALLON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR c: Counsel to the Authority Attachments

Amendment No. 3 to

Agreement No. LA-RICS 007

AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE

TO AGREEMENT NO. LA-RICS 007 FOR

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM – LAND MOBILE RADIO SYSTEM

Recitals

This Amendment Number Three (together with all exhibits, attachments, and schedules hereto, "Amendment No. 3") is entered into by and between the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority ("Authority") and Motorola Solutions, Inc. ("Contractor"), effective as of November _____, 2013, based on the following recitals:

Authority and Contractor have entered into that certain Agreement No. LA-RICS 007 for Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System ("LA-RICS") – Land Mobile Radio System, dated as of August 15, 2013 (together with all exhibits, attachments, and schedules thereto, all as amended prior to the date hereof, the "Agreement").

The Agreement has been previously amended by Amendment Number One, effective as of September 5, 2013, to exercise the Unilateral Option for all Work pertaining to Phase 1, without the Additive Alternates.

The Agreement has been previously amended by Amendment Number Two, effective as of October 29, 2013, to exercise the Unilateral Option for all Work pertaining to Project Descriptions in Phase 1 for the Bounded Area Coverage Additive Alternate.

Authority and Contractor desire to further amend the Agreement (a) to move from Phases 3 and 4 to Phase 1, Contractor's provision and implementation of certain equipment reflected in the attached Exhibit C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design), , and (b) to engage Contractor to provide and implement under Phase 1, certain additional equipment reflected in the attached Exhibit C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) (the equipment described in clauses (a) and (b) is collectively referred to as the "Specified Equipment").

As provided in Section 4.1.2.2(c) of the Base Document to the Agreement, Authority has determined in its sole and unilateral discretion to exercise the Unilateral Option for all Work pertaining to Contractor's provision and implementation of the Specified Equipment during Phase 1.

Authority and Contractor desire to amend the Agreement (a) to make changes necessary to reflect the movement of Contractor's provision and implementation of certain Specified Equipment from Phases 3 and 4 to Phase 1, (b) to make changes necessary to reflect the engagement of Contractor to provide and implement certain Specified Equipment under Phase 1, (c) to make changes necessary to reflect the Authority's exercise of the Unilateral Option for all Work pertaining to the provision and implementation

AGENDA ITEM 7 - ATTACHMENT A

Amendment No. 3 to


of the Specified Equipment during Phase 1, and (d) to make other changes as reflected in this Amendment No. 3.

This Amendment No. 3 is authorized under Section 2 (Changes to Agreement) of the Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, all of which are incorporated as part of this Amendment No. 3, and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, Authority and Contractor hereby agree as follows:

1. Capitalized Terms; Section References. Capitalized terms used herein without definition (including in the recitals hereto), have the meanings given to such terms in the Base Document. Unless otherwise noted, section references in this Amendment No. 3 refer to sections of the Base Document, as amended by this Amendment No. 3.

2. Amendments to Base Document.

2.1 Section 8.1.1 of the Base Document is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

8.1.1 The "Maximum Contract Sum" under this Agreement is Two Hundred Eighty-One Million, Six Hundred and Forty Thousand, One Hundred Eighty-Four Dollars ($281,640,184), which includes the Contract Sum and all Unilateral Option Sums, as set forth in Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments).

2.2 Section 37.6 (Contractor's Authorized Agents) is added in the proper numerical order to Section 37 (Administration of Agreement – Contractor) of the Base Document as follows:

37.7 Authorized Agents

37.2.1 Contractor's authorized agents are designated in Exhibit F (Administration of Agreement). Contractor shall notify the Authority in writing prior to any change in the names and/or addresses of the Contractor's authorized agents.

37.2.2 Contractor represents and warrants that each person identified on Exhibit F (Administration of Agreement) as Contractor's authorized agent has actual authority to bind Contractor to each and every term, condition, and obligation of Amendments to this Agreement, subject to the limitations described on Exhibit F (Administration of Agreement) for such person. Contractor additionally represents and warrants that all requirements of Contractor have been fulfilled to


Amendment No. 3 to


provide actual authority to such persons to execute Amendments to this Agreement.

2.3 Section 24.4.1 of the Base Document is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

24.4.1 Except for liability resulting form personal injury, harm to tangible property, or wrongful death, Contractor's total liability to the Authority, whether for breach of contract, warranty, negligence, or strict liability in tort, will be limited in the aggregate to direct damages no greater than Two Hundred Sixty-Four Million, Two Hundred Sixty-Nine Thousand, Two Hundred Seventy-Eight ($264,269,278).

3. Exercise of Unilateral Option. As provided in Section 4.1.2.2(c) of the Base Document, Authority has determined in its sole and unilateral discretion to exercise the Unilateral Option for all Work pertaining to the Contractor's provision and installation of the Specified Equipment during Phase 1 as reflected in Exhibit C.2 (Schedule of Payments – Phase 1 – System Design), and hereby exercises such Unilateral Option and for such Work. Subject to Section 4.1.2.3 (Notices to Proceed) of the Base Document, the Contractor agrees the Contractor shall, on a timely basis and in accordance with the Agreement, fully perform, provide, complete, and deliver all Work encompassed in such Unilateral Option, in exchange for the amounts set forth on Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments) for such Work.

4. Amendments to Agreement Exhibits.

4.1 Exhibit C.1 (Schedule of Payments – LMR System Payment Summary) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with Exhibit C.1 (Schedule of Payments – LMR System Payment Summary) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments) attached to this Amendment No. 3, which is incorporated by this reference.

4.2 Exhibit C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with Exhibit C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments) attached to this Amendment No. 3, which is incorporated by this reference.

4.3 Exhibit C.4 (Supply LMR System Components) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with C.4 (Supply LMR System Components) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments) attached to this Amendment No. 3, which is incorporated by this reference.

4.4 Exhibit C.5 (LMR System Implementation) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with C.5 (LMR System Implementation) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments) attached to this Amendment No. 3, which is incorporated by this reference.


Amendment No. 3 to


3.5 Exhibit F (Administration of Agreement) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with Exhibit F (Administration of Agreement) attached to this Amendment No. 3, which is incorporated by this reference.

5. This Amendment No. 3 shall become effective as of the date identified in the recitals, which is the date upon which:

5.1 An authorized agent of Contractor has executed this Amendment No. 3;

5.2 Los Angeles County Counsel has approved this Amendment No. 3 as to form;

5.3 The Board of Directors of the Authority has authorized the Executive Director of the Authority to execute this Amendment No. 3; and

5.4 The Executive Director of the Authority has executed this Amendment No. 3.

6. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment No. 3, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same and in full force and effect.

7. Contractor and the person executing this Amendment No. 3 on behalf of Contractor represent and warrant that the person executing this Amendment No. 3 for Contractor is an authorized agent who has actual authority to bind Contractor to each and every term and condition of this Amendment No. 3, and that all requirements of Contractor to provide such actual authority have been fulfilled.

8. This Amendment No. 3 may be executed in one or more original or facsimile counterparts, all of which when taken together shall constitute one in the same instrument

* * *


Amendment No. 3 to


AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE

TO AGREEMENT NO. LA-RICS 007 FOR

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM – LAND MOBILE RADIO SYSTEM

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 3 to

be executed on their behalf by their duly authorized representatives, effective as of the date first set forth above.


By:

Patrick J. Mallon Executive Director

MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.

By:

APPROVED AS TO FORM FOR THE LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY:

JOHN F. KRATTLI County Counsel

By:

Amanda M. L. Drukker Senior Deputy County Counsel


EXHIBIT C.1Agreement No. LA-RICS 007 - Amended and Restated under Amendment No. 3

SummaryUnilateral

Option Sum

Contract Sum -

Full Payable

Amount

10% Holdback

Amount

Payment Minus

10% Holdback

Amount

Phase 1 $ - 29,693,611 $ 2,901,553 $ 26,792,058

Bounded Area Coverage Additive

Alternate Project Description in Phase

1(Note 1) $ 173,110 $ 17,311 $ 155,799

Phase 2 $ 41,395,106 $ - $ 4,030,120 $ 37,364,985

Phase 3 $ 50,206,011 $ - $ 5,294,164 $ 48,649,017

Phase 4 $ 29,619,390 $ - $ 2,899,217 $ 26,720,173

SUBTOTAL (Phases 1 to 4): $ 121,220,506 $ 29,866,721 $ 15,142,365 $ 139,682,032

Phase 5 (15 Years) $ 55,898,518 $ - $ - $ 55,898,518

TOTAL (Phases 1 to 5): $ 177,119,024 $ 29,866,721 $ 15,142,365 $ 195,580,551

Bounded Area Coverage Additive

Alternate (Note 1) $ 19,109,375 $ 1,910,937 $ 17,198,437

Mandatory Building Coverage Additive

Alternate $ 29,828,448 $ - $ 2,982,845 $ 26,845,603

Metrorail Coverage Additive Alternate $ 4,792,260 $ - $ 479,226 $ 4,313,034

LMR System Maintenance for Additive

Alternates $ 19,620,355 $ - $ 1,962,036 $ 17,658,320

Source Code Software Escrow $ 1,304,000 $ - $ 130,400 $ 1,173,600

TOTAL UNILATERAL OPTION SUM /

TOTAL CONTRACT SUM: $ 251,773,462 $ 29,866,721 $ 22,607,808 $ 262,769,544

MAXIMUM CONTRACT SUM (Total

Unilateral Option Sum plus Total

Contract Sum):

EXHIBIT C.1 - SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS

LMR SYSTEM PAYMENT SUMMARY

$281,640,184

Note 1: The cost for the Project Descriptions for the Bounded Area Coverage only are reflected in Exhibit C.2 (Phase 1 - System Design) as

amended and restated in Amendment No. 2. The balance of the remaining Unilateral Option Sum for Bounded Area Coverage Additive

Alternate Work is reflected in Exhibit C.7 (Bounded Area Coverage Additive Alternate).

Exhibit C.1 (Payment Summary) Exhibit C.1 (Page 1 of 1) LA-RICS LMR Agreement



Deliverable/Task/

Section No. (Exhibit A, Exhibit B, or Base

Document)

Deliverable

Unilateral

Option Sum (Notes 3 & 5)

Contract Sum

Payable

Amount (Notes 3 & 5)

10%

Holdback

Amount

Payable

Amount Less

10% Holdback

A.1.1 Project Management Staffing Plan Delivered - Included $ - $ -

A.1.2 Overview and Scope Delivered - Included $ - $ -

A.1.3 Communications Plan Delivered - $ 67,233 $ 6,723 $ 60,509

A.1.4 Initial Integrated Master Schedule Delivered - $ 89,644 $ 8,964 $ 80,679

A.1.5 Documentation Plan Delivered - Included $ - $ -

A.1.6 Quality Control Plan Delivered - $ 67,233 $ 6,723 $ 60,509

A.1.7 Change Order/Change Management Plan Delivered - Included $ - $ -

A.1.8 Initial Risk Management Plan Delivered - $ 89,644 $ 8,964 $ 80,679

A.1 Project Management Plan - Final - $ 112,055 $ 11,205 $ 100,849

B.1.6 FCC License and Application Forms - Included $ - $ -

B.1.12 Coverage Modeling Tool and Training - Included $ - $ -

B.1.14.1 Detailed Project Description - 50% of sites - $ 1,368,583 $ 136,858 $ 1,231,724

B.1.14.1 Detailed Project Description - Final 50% of Sites - $ 1,368,583 $ 136,858 $ 1,231,724

B.1.14.2 RF Emission Safety Report Delivered - Included $ - $ -

B.1.14.3.3.29.1 DTVRS Design – Digital Trunked Voice Radio Subsystem - $ 2,457,181 $ 245,718 $ 2,211,463

B.1.14.3.3.29.2 ACVRS Design – Analog Conventional Voice Radio Subsystem - $ 558,114 $ 55,811 $ 502,303

B.1.14.3.3.29.3

LARTCS Design – Los Angeles Regional Tactical Communications

Subsystem - $ 607,679 $ 60,768 $ 546,911

B.1.14.3.3.29.4 NMDN Design – Narrowband Mobile Data Network - $ 142,058 $ 14,206 $ 127,852

B.1.14.3.3.29.5 Consoles Design - Included

B.1.14.3.3.29.6 Logging Recorder Description - Included

B.1.14.3.3.29.7 Site Interconnection/Backhaul Subsystem Description - $ 212,904 $ 21,290 $ 191,613

B.1.14.3.3.29.8 System Management and Monitoring Subsystem Description - Included

B.1.14.3.3.29.9 Inventory and Maintenance Tracking Subsystem Description - Included

B.1.14.3 LMR Final System Design Approval (Note 1)

- $ 757,702 $ 75,770 $ 681,932

B.1.14.5 Site Design Review Packages 75% Zoning Submittal by Site (Note 2)

- $ - $ -

B.1.14.5.Site 1 Baldwin Hills - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 2 Black Jack Peak - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 3 Bald Mountain - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 4 Blue Rock - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 5 Burnt Peak - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 6 Beverly Glen - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 7 Compton Court Building - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 8 Century Plaza - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 9 Claremont - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 10 Castro Peak - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 11 Dakin Peak - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 12 El Segundo PD - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 13 Encinal 1 (Fire Camp) - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 14 Green Mountain - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 15 Hauser Peak - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 16 Johnstone Peak - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 17 FS 28 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 18 FS 56 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 19 FS 71 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 20 FS 72 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 21 FS 77 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 22 FS 84 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 23 FS 91 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 24 FS 99 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 25 FS 119 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 26 FS 144 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 27 FS 149 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 28 FS 157 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 29 FS 169 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 30 CP 9 - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 31 Del Valle Training - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 32 LA City Hall - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 33 Lower Blue Ridge - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 34 DWP Sylmar Water Ladder - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 35 Magic Mountain - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424


PHASE 1 - SYSTEM DESIGN

Exhibit C.2 (Phase 1 - System Design) Exhibit C.2 (Page 1 of 5) LA-RICS LMR Agreement



Deliverable/Task/


Document)

Deliverable

Unilateral


Contract Sum

Payable


10%

Holdback

Amount

Payable

Amount Less

10% Holdback



B.1.14.5.Site 36 Mount Disappointment - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 37 Mount Lee - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 38 Mira Loma Facility - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 39 Mount McDill - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 40 Mount Lukens - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 41 Mount Thom - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 42 Mount Washington - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 43 Monte Vista (Star Center) - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 44 Oat Mountain - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424


B.1.14.5.Site 46 Oat Mountain Nike - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 47 Puente Hills - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 48 Portal Ridge - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 49 Pomona 1620 Hillcrest - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 50 Redondo Beach PD - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 51 Rolling Hills Transmit - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 52 Rio Hondo - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 53 City Hall - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 54 San Augustine - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 55 San Dimas - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 56 Signal Hill - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 57 San Pedro Hill - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 58 Saddle Peak - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 59 Sunset Ridge - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 60 San Vicente Peak - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 61 Southwest Area Station - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 62 Topanga Peak - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 63 Tejon Peak - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 64 Tower Peak - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 65 Verdugo Peak - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 66 Walker Drive - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 67 Whitaker Middle Peak - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 68 100 Wilshire - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 69 Whittaker Ridge - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 70 77TH Street Area Complex - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 71 Devonshire Area station - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 72 L.A. County Fire Command - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.5.Site 73 Valley Dispatch Center - $ 7,138 $ 714 $ 6,424

B.1.14.6 Permit Approval by Site (Note 2)

- $ - $ -

B.1.14.6.Site 1 Baldwin Hills - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 2 Black Jack Peak - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 3 Bald Mountain - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 4 Blue Rock - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 5 Burnt Peak - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 6 Beverly Glen - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 7 Compton Court Building - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 8 Century Plaza - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 9 Claremont - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 10 Castro Peak - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 11 Dakin Peak - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 12 El Segundo PD - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 13 Encinal 1 (Fire Camp) - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 14 Green Mountain - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 15 Hauser Peak - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 16 Johnstone Peak - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 17 FS 28 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 18 FS 56 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 19 FS 71 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 20 FS 72 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 21 FS 77 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 22 FS 84 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 23 FS 91 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141




Deliverable/Task/


Document)

Deliverable

Unilateral


Contract Sum

Payable


10%

Holdback

Amount

Payable

Amount Less

10% Holdback



B.1.14.6.Site 24 FS 99 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 25 FS 119 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 26 FS 144 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 27 FS 149 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 28 FS 157 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 29 FS 169 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 30 CP 9 - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 31 Del Valle Training - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 32 LA City Hall - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 33 Lower Blue Ridge - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 34 DWP Sylmar Water Ladder - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 35 Magic Mountain - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 36 Mount Disappointment - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 37 Mount Lee - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 38 Mira Loma Facility - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 39 Mount McDill - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 40 Mount Lukens - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 41 Mount Thom - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 42 Mount Washington - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 43 Monte Vista (Star Center) - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141



B.1.14.6.Site 46 Oat Mountain Nike - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 47 Puente Hills - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 48 Portal Ridge - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 49 Pomona 1620 Hillcrest - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 50 Redondo Beach PD - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 51 Rolling Hills Transmit - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 52 Rio Hondo - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 53 City Hall - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 54 San Augustine - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 55 San Dimas - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 56 Signal Hill - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 57 San Pedro Hill - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 58 Saddle Peak - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 59 Sunset Ridge - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 60 San Vicente Peak - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 61 Southwest Area Station - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 62 Topanga Peak - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 63 Tejon Peak - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 64 Tower Peak - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 65 Verdugo Peak - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 66 Walker Drive - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 67 Whitaker Middle Peak - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 68 100 Wilshire - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 69 Whittaker Ridge - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 70 77TH Street Area Complex - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 71 Devonshire Area station - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 72 L.A. County Fire Command - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.14.6.Site 73 Valley Dispatch Center - $ 2,379 $ 238 $ 2,141

B.1.15 Inventory and Maintenance Tracking Subsystem - $ 974,026 $ 97,403 $ 876,623

Project Management for Phase 1 – System Design Monthly Reports - Included $ - $ -

Base.22.3.2 Performance Bond for Phase 1 – System Design - $ 29,774 $ - $ 29,774

Total Lease Costs for Phase 1 – System Design - N/A $ -

Base.22.2.1 Liability Insurance (General and Professional) - $ 527,500 $ - $ 527,500

B.3.2 to B.3.6 Core 1 Hardware and Software - $ 11,645,162 $ 1,164,516 $ 10,480,645

Core T1 Interface Equipment - $ 49,878 $ 4,988 $ 44,890

NMS AC Power - $ 1,308 $ 131 $ 1,177

FCC License Application Preparation - $ 7,500 $ 750 $ 6,750

Remote Site AC Power - $ 7,848 $ 785 $ 7,063

CORE 1 AND REPEATER SITES




Deliverable/Task/


Document)

Deliverable

Unilateral


Contract Sum

Payable


10%

Holdback

Amount

Payable

Amount Less

10% Holdback



B.3.2 to B.3.6 Five DTVRS UHF 11 Channel ASTRO 25 Sites - $ 1,144,758 $ 114,476 $ 1,030,283

B.3.2 to B.3.6 Three DTVRS 700 MHz 6 Channel ASTRO 25 Sites - $ 404,440 $ 40,444 $ 363,996

B.3.2 to B.3.6 Three MCC 7500 Consoles for DTVRS - $ 197,074 $ 19,707 $ 177,366

C.14 Portable Radio Upgrade Kits (2009 UASI Funds) - $ 65,800 $ 6,580 $ 59,220

C.14 Portable Radio Upgrade Kits (2010 UASI Funds) - $ 296,100 $ 29,610 $ 266,490

B.4.2.3

Installation, Optimization, Staging and Testing for Core 1 and Repeater

Sites - $ 463,818 $ 46,382 $ 417,436

Base.22.3.2 Performance Bond for Core 1 and Repeater Sites - $ 89,801 $ - $ 89,801

B.3.2 to B.3.6 Core 2 Hardware - $ 3,650,360 $ 365,036 $ 3,285,324

B.4.2.3 Installation, Optimization, Staging and Testing for Core 2 - $ 301,757 $ 30,176 $ 271,581

Base.22.3.2 Performance Bond for Core 2 - $ 24,663 $ - $ 24,663

System on Wheels (SOW) - $ - $ - $ -

SOW - 95' MAST, 8' X 16' WALK-IN SHELTER - $ 468,439 $ 46,844 421,595$

DTVRS - ASTRO Site Repeaters (ASR) - $ 408,816 $ 40,882 367,934$

Core Licenses for 700/UHF ASR Sites - $ 127,748 $ 12,775 114,973$

Mobile Meshed VSAT Satellite System & Installation - $ 126,233 $ 12,623 113,610$

MSI Design and Implementation Services - $ 81,116 $ 8,112 73,004$

Base.22.3.2 Performance Bond for SOW - $ 6,345 $ - 6,345$

Total for Phase 1 - System Design - 29,693,611$ 2,901,553$ 26,792,058$

Deliverable/Task/


Document)

DeliverableUnilateral

Option Sum

Contract Sum

Payable

Amount (Note 4)

10%

Holdback

Amount

Payable

Amount Less

10% Holdback

B.1.14.1

Detailed Project Description for Bounded Area Coverage at the

following Sites: (Note 4)

- - - -

Century Plaza - 9,674$ $ 967 8,707$

LAC/HARBOR+UCLA MEDICAL CENTER - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

FS30 - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

FS 51 - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

FS 151 - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

FS 164 - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

FS 173 - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

FS 005 - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

FS 079 - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

FS 084 - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

FS 088 - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

FS 095 - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

Carson - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

San Pedro City Hall - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

West Hollywood Sheriff Station - 11,674$ $ 1,167 10,507$

Total for Bounded Area Covereage Project Descriptions - $ 173,110 $ 17,311 $ 155,799

$ - $ 29,866,721 $ 2,918,864 $ 25,850,396

Total for Phase 1 - System Design including Bounded Area Coverage Project

Descriptions:

Note 1: Should a Site fall out for permitting reasons, Contractor will redo the Final System Design at no charge to the Authority.

PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS FOR BOUNDED AREA COVERAGE IN PHASE 1

CORE 2

SYSTEM ON WHEELS

Note 2: 75% will occur at submittal for planning review. The remaining 25% will be paid upon receipt of construction permit.

Note 4: Pursuant to Amendment No. Two, effective as of October 29, 2013, the Authority exercised the Unilateral Option for all work pertaining to

Bounded Area Coverage Project Descriptions for Phase 1. In connection therewith, the Unilateral Option Sum for Bounded Area Coverage Project

Descriptions for Phase 1 in the amount of $173, 110 was converted into a Contract Sum. The cost for the Project Descriptions for the Bounded Area

Coverage only are reflected in Exhibit C.2 (Phase 1 - System Design) as amended and restated in Amendment No. 2. The balance of the remaining

Unilateral Option Sum for Bounded Area Coverage Additive Alternate is reflected in Exhibit C.7 (Bounded Area Coverage Additive Alternate).

Note 3: Pursuant to Amendment No. One, effective as of September 5, 2013, the Authority exercised the Unilateral Option for all work pertaining to Phase

1. In connection therewith, the Unilateral Option Sum for Phase 1 of $29,266,721 was converted into a Contract Sum.




Deliverable/Task/


Document)

Deliverable

Unilateral


Contract Sum

Payable


10%

Holdback

Amount

Payable

Amount Less

10% Holdback



In connection therewith, (i) a Unilateral Option Sum in the amount of $4,362,681 was moved from Schedules C.4 (Schedule of Payments Phase 3 – Supply

LMR System Components) and C.5 (Schedule of Payments Phase 4 – System Implementation) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments) to Schedule C.2

(Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments), as amended by Amendment No. Three, and thereafter such

Unilateral Option Sum was converted to a Contract Sum; and (ii) a Unilateral Option Sum in the amount of $1,285,230 was added to Schedule C.2

(Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments), as amended by Amendment No. Three, and thereafter such

Unilateral Option Sum was converted to a Contract Sum.

Note 5: Pursuant to Amendment No. Three, effective as of November ______, 2013, (a) Contractor's provision and implementation of certain equipment

reflected in Exhibit C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments), as amended by Amendment No. Three, was

moved from Phases 3 and 4 to Phase 1; and (b) Contractor was engaged to provide and implement under Phase 1, certain additional equipment reflected in

Exhibit C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments), as amended by Amendment No. Three, (the equipment

described in clauses (a) and (b) is collectively referred to as the "Specified Equipment").



EXHIBIT C.4Agreement No. LA-RICS 007 - Amended and Restated under Amendment 3

Deliverable / Task /


Document)

Deliverable

Total Unilateral

Option Sum for

EquipmentNote 1

Equipment

Purchase in

Phase 1

Credit per

SiteNote 1

DTVRS ACVRS LARTCS NMDN Microwave

Total Contract

Sum - Total

Payable Amount

for Equipment

10% Holdback

Amount

Payable Amount

Less 10%

Holdback

B.3.2 to B.3.6 Equipment Delivery

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 1 Baldwin Hills 567,881$ (1,002,901)$ -$ 232,691$ 131,706$ 123,657$ 79,827$ -$ 123,893$ 1,115,038$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 2 Black Jack Peak 828,779$ (911,752)$ 917,609$ 198,138$ 515,961$ 80,765$ 28,058$ -$ 137,282$ 1,235,537$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 3 Bald Mountain 602,527$ (479,842)$ 482,925$ 92,238$ 425,665$ 45,509$ 36,032$ -$ 85,370$ 768,333$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 4 Blue Rock 689,729$ -$ 40,629$ 92,357$ 426,740$ 80,765$ 49,237$ -$ 54,401$ 489,612$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 5 Burnt Peak 770,548$ -$ 174,617$ 92,019$ 425,426$ 45,188$ 33,297$ -$ 60,776$ 546,983$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 6 Beverly Glen 1,074,359$ -$ 546,877$ 165,584$ 289,171$ 45,010$ 27,717$ -$ 84,739$ 762,647$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 7 Compton Court Building 271,369$ (479,318)$ 482,397$ 232,114$ -$ -$ 36,176$ -$ 59,209$ 532,884$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 8 Century Plaza 316,876$ -$ -$ 165,754$ 84,008$ -$ 67,114$ -$ 24,993$ 224,938$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 9 Claremont 361,282$ -$ -$ 205,482$ 79,880$ 45,667$ 30,252$ -$ 28,496$ 256,460$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 10 Castro Peak 728,811$ (544,635)$ 548,133$ 166,212$ 426,740$ 80,765$ 51,596$ -$ 100,441$ 903,971$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 11 Dakin Peak 1,230,281$ -$ 483,521$ 198,377$ 427,813$ 80,964$ 39,606$ -$ 97,037$ 873,330$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 12 El Segundo PD 209,616$ -$ 176,055$ -$ -$ -$ 33,561$ -$ 16,533$ 148,799$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 13 Encinal 1 (Fire Camp) 394,379$ -$ 241,403$ -$ 79,904$ 45,708$ 27,363$ -$ 31,106$ 279,955$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 14 L.A. County Fire Command 283,966$ (544,635)$ 548,133$ 198,138$ 14,711$ -$ 67,617$ -$ 65,355$ 588,192$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 15 Green Mountain 1,250,923$ -$ 548,133$ 166,212$ 426,740$ 45,708$ 64,131$ -$ 98,665$ 887,983$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 16 Hauser Peak 824,385$ (911,455)$ 917,311$ 87,105$ 604,107$ 80,566$ 46,752$ -$ 136,912$ 1,232,207$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 17 Johnstone Peak 802,712$ (480,139)$ 483,223$ 205,519$ 426,740$ 123,657$ 43,712$ -$ 101,183$ 910,647$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 18 FS 28 215,658$ -$ 176,055$ -$ -$ -$ 39,603$ -$ 17,010$ 153,087$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 19 FS 56 204,397$ -$ 176,055$ -$ -$ -$ 28,341$ -$ 16,121$ 145,093$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 20 FS 71 314,877$ -$ -$ 197,263$ 87,218$ -$ 30,396$ -$ 24,835$ 223,519$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 21 FS 72 825,571$ -$ 546,319$ 165,304$ 87,051$ -$ 26,897$ -$ 65,116$ 586,041$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 22 FS 77 1,149,080$ -$ 868,772$ -$ 253,795$ -$ 26,513$ -$ 90,632$ 815,688$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 23 FS 84 215,389$ -$ 176,254$ -$ -$ -$ 39,134$ -$ 16,988$ 152,896$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 24 FS 91 176,055$ -$ 176,055$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 13,886$ 124,975$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 25 FS 99 823,549$ -$ 546,820$ 197,263$ 79,467$ -$ -$ -$ 64,956$ 584,607$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 26 FS 119 214,089$ -$ 176,055$ -$ -$ -$ 38,033$ -$ 16,886$ 151,973$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 27 FS 144 240,747$ -$ 240,747$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 18,989$ 170,897$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 28 FS 149 117,537$ -$ -$ -$ 79,467$ -$ 38,070$ -$ 9,271$ 83,435$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 29 FS 157 422,800$ -$ -$ -$ 422,800$ -$ -$ -$ 33,348$ 300,129$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 30 FS 169 219,485$ -$ 176,055$ -$ -$ -$ 43,429$ -$ 17,312$ 155,804$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 31 CP 9 277,272$ -$ -$ 91,920$ 79,467$ -$ 105,886$ -$ 21,869$ 196,825$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 32 Del Valle Training 661,951$ -$ 372,867$ 91,920$ 164,574$ -$ 32,590$ -$ 52,210$ 469,894$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 33 LA City Hall 115,658$ (547,158)$ -$ 66,058$ -$ -$ 49,600$ -$ 52,279$ 470,508$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 34 Lower Blue Ridge 877,470$ -$ 40,629$ 241,077$ 426,740$ 123,657$ 45,368$ -$ 69,209$ 622,883$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 35 DWP Sylmar Water Ladder 283,372$ -$ 176,055$ -$ 79,467$ -$ 27,849$ -$ 22,351$ 201,155$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 36 Magic Mountain 825,613$ -$ 40,629$ 223,295$ 426,740$ 45,708$ 89,241$ -$ 65,119$ 586,071$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 37 Mount Disappointment 790,099$ (544,635)$ 548,133$ 205,519$ 426,740$ 123,657$ 30,685$ -$ 105,275$ 947,477$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 38 Mount Lee 807,130$ (548,133)$ -$ 262,589$ 391,402$ 123,657$ 29,482$ -$ 106,894$ 962,050$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 39 Mira Loma Facility 288,273$ (911,752)$ 917,609$ 205,383$ -$ 45,708$ 31,324$ -$ 94,650$ 851,852$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 40 Mount McDill 439,393$ (480,139)$ 483,223$ -$ 295,046$ 80,765$ 60,498$ -$ 72,527$ 652,741$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 41 Mount Lukens 935,119$ (547,298)$ -$ 314,235$ 424,232$ 123,192$ 73,460$ -$ 116,923$ 1,052,311$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 42 Mount Thom 804,736$ -$ 696,171$ -$ -$ 80,765$ 27,801$ -$ 63,472$ 571,252$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 43 Mount Washington 306,208$ -$ -$ 198,138$ -$ 45,708$ 62,362$ -$ 24,152$ 217,365$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 44 Monte Vista (Star Center) 465,528$ (482,444)$ -$ 354,930$ -$ 80,245$ 30,352$ -$ 74,770$ 672,930$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 45 Oat Mountain 81,295$ (175,367)$ 176,493$ -$ -$ -$ 80,168$ -$ 20,244$ 182,194$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 46 Oat Mountain (City) 854,894$ -$ 176,490$ 92,354$ 426,709$ 123,651$ 35,691$ -$ 67,429$ 606,857$


PHASE 3 - SUPPLY LMR SYSTEM COMPONENTS

Exhibit C.4 (Phase 3 - Supply LMR System Components) Exhibit C.4 (Page 1 of 3) LA-RICS LMR Agreement





Document)

Deliverable

Total Unilateral

Option Sum for

EquipmentNote 1

Equipment

Purchase in

Phase 1

Credit per

SiteNote 1


Total Contract

Sum - Total

Payable Amount

for Equipment

10% Holdback

Amount

Payable Amount

Less 10%

Holdback



B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 47 Oat Mountain Nike 231,270$ -$ 203,799$ -$ -$ -$ 27,471$ -$ 18,241$ 164,170$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 48 Puente Hills 922,240$ (479,842)$ 482,925$ 355,603$ 485,146$ 45,509$ 32,899$ -$ 110,587$ 995,285$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 49 Portal Ridge 327,945$ (480,139)$ 483,223$ 92,357$ 132,679$ 45,708$ 54,116$ -$ 63,736$ 573,628$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 50 Pomona 1620 Hillcrest 561,860$ -$ 483,223$ -$ -$ 45,708$ 32,929$ -$ 44,316$ 398,843$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 51 Redondo Beach PD 212,620$ -$ 176,254$ -$ -$ -$ 36,366$ -$ 16,770$ 150,931$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 52 Rolling Hills Transmit 395,364$ (911,752)$ 917,609$ 237,432$ -$ 123,657$ 28,417$ -$ 103,097$ 927,872$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 53 Rio Hondo 612,387$ (911,455)$ 917,311$ 383,845$ 109,525$ 80,566$ 32,596$ -$ 120,191$ 1,081,718$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 54 Rancho Palos Verde City Hall 213,859$ -$ 176,055$ -$ -$ -$ 37,803$ -$ 16,868$ 151,810$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 55 San Augustine 862,212$ -$ 548,133$ 205,519$ -$ 80,765$ 27,795$ -$ 68,006$ 612,052$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 56 San Dimas 334,736$ (480,139)$ 483,223$ 205,519$ -$ 80,765$ 45,368$ -$ 64,272$ 578,448$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 57 Signal Hill 815,924$ -$ 483,223$ 289,775$ -$ -$ 42,926$ -$ 64,355$ 579,193$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 58 San Pedro Hill 1,039,983$ -$ 483,223$ 356,021$ 171,476$ -$ 29,263$ -$ 82,027$ 738,244$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 59 Saddle Peak 1,284,413$ -$ 548,133$ 198,138$ 426,740$ 80,765$ 30,636$ -$ 101,306$ 911,756$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 60 Sunset Ridge 793,544$ -$ -$ 205,228$ 428,999$ 123,333$ 35,984$ -$ 62,590$ 563,307$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 61 Southwest Area Station 162,316$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 162,316$ -$ 12,802$ 115,222$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 62 San Vicente Peak 1,036,887$ -$ 548,133$ 166,212$ 210,547$ 80,765$ 31,230$ -$ 81,783$ 736,047$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 63 Topanga Peak 1,203,027$ -$ 1,002,901$ -$ 79,904$ 80,765$ 39,457$ -$ 94,887$ 853,984$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 64 Tejon Peak 219,249$ (480,139)$ 483,223$ 92,357$ -$ 80,765$ 43,042$ -$ 55,163$ 496,469$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 65 Tower Peak 707,395$ (479,365)$ 482,444$ 197,515$ 423,935$ 45,189$ 37,676$ -$ 93,604$ 842,436$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 66 Verdugo Peak (city) 488,989$ (522,426)$ 24,455$ 222,460$ 79,487$ 122,961$ 39,625$ -$ 79,774$ 717,965$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 67 Walker Drive 742,588$ -$ 547,379$ 165,834$ -$ -$ 29,375$ -$ 58,571$ 527,135$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 68 Whitaker Middle Peak 602,173$ (479,332)$ 482,412$ 92,033$ 423,818$ 45,167$ 38,076$ -$ 85,302$ 767,719$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 69 100 Wilshire 272,892$ -$ -$ 197,561$ -$ -$ 75,330$ -$ 21,524$ 193,715$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 70 Whittaker Ridge 410,870$ (479,332)$ 482,412$ 205,032$ 79,580$ 80,224$ 42,956$ -$ 70,213$ 631,921$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 71 77TH Street Area Complex 37,945$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 37,945$ -$ 2,993$ 26,935$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 72 Devonshire Area station 35,877$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 35,877$ -$ 2,830$ 25,467$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 73 Valley Dispatch Center 52,416$ -$ -$ -$ 14,711$ -$ 37,705$ -$ 4,134$ 37,208$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 74 FCCF_Core 41,568$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 41,568$ -$ 3,279$ 29,508$

B.3.2 to B.3.6.Site 75 LAPDVDC_Core 41,568$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 41,568$ -$ 3,279$ 29,508$

$ 39,825,780 $ (15,295,522) $ 23,918,153 $ 9,273,631 $ 12,002,773 $ 3,163,247 $ 3,113,137 $ - $ 4,347,614 $ 39,128,527

B.3.7 Consoles for LARTCS $ 502,275 $ - 50,228$ 452,048$

B.3.8 Logging Recorder $ 1,576,467 $ - 157,647$ 1,418,820$

B.3.9 System Management and Monitoring Subsystem $ 445,681 $ - 44,568$ 401,113$

B.1.6 FCC Licensing $ 284,041 $ - 28,404$ 255,636$

B.3.10 Pre-Installation Testing Acceptance - Core Staging for SOT Prep $ - -$ -$

B.3.10.1.DTVRS Pre-Installation Testing Acceptance - Core Staging for SOT Prep (DTVRS) $ 2,344,147 $ - 234,415$ 2,109,732$

B.3.10.1.ACVRS Pre-Installation Testing Acceptance - Core Staging for SOT Prep (ACVRS) $ 746,582 $ - 74,658$ 671,924$

B.3.10.1.LARTCS

Pre-Installation Testing Acceptance - Core Staging for SOT Prep

(LARTCS) $ 966,294 $ - 96,629$ 869,664$

B.3.10.1.NMDN Pre-Installation Testing Acceptance - Core Staging for SOT Prep (NMDN) $ 254,660 $ - 25,466$ 229,194$

B.3.10.1.FINAL Pre-Installation Testing Acceptance - Core Staging for SOT Prep FINAL $ 250,626 $ - 25,063$ 225,563$

B.3.10.2.BALANCE Pre-Installation Testing Acceptance - Balance of Sites by Site $ 2,456,627 $ - 245,663$ 2,210,965$

Equipment Shipment: Credit for Portable Radio Upgrades $ (361,900) $ - (36,190)$ (325,710)$

Base.22.3.2 Performance Bond for Phase 3 - Supply LMR System Components $ 474,041 $ - 474,041$

Site Equipment Subtotal






Document)

Deliverable

Total Unilateral

Option Sum for

EquipmentNote 1

Equipment

Purchase in

Phase 1

Credit per

SiteNote 1


Total Contract

Sum - Total

Payable Amount

for Equipment

10% Holdback

Amount

Payable Amount

Less 10%

Holdback



Total Lease Costs for Phase 3 - Supply LMR System Components N/A $ -

Base.22.2.1 Liability Insurance (General and Professional) $ 440,691 $ - 527,500$

$ 50,206,011 $ (15,295,522) $ 23,918,153 $ 9,273,631 $ 12,002,773 $ 3,163,247 $ 3,113,137 $ - $ 5,294,164 $ 48,649,017

Note 1: Pursuant to Amendment No. Three, effective as of November ______, 2013, (a) Contractor's provision and implementation of certain equipment reflected in Exhibit C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments), as

amended by Amendment No. Three, was moved from Phases 3 and 4 to Phase 1; and (b) Contractor was engaged to provide and implement under Phase 1, certain additional equipment reflected in Exhibit C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C

(Schedule of Payments), as amended by Amendment No. Three, (the equipment described in clauses (a) and (b) is collectively referred to as the "Specified Equipment").

In connection therewith, (i) a Unilateral Option Sum in the amount of $4,362,681 was moved from Schedules C.4 (Schedule of Payments Phase 3 – Supply LMR System Components) and C.5 (Schedule of Payments Phase 4 – System Implementation) to Exhibit C (Schedule

of Payments) to Schedule C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments), as amended by Amendment No. Three, and thereafter such Unilateral Option Sum was converted to a Contract Sum; and (ii) a Unilateral Option Sum in

the amount of $1,285,230 was added to Schedule C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments), as amended by Amendment No. Three, and thereafter such Unilateral Option Sum was converted to a Contract Sum.

Total for Phase 3 - Supply LMR System Components:




Qty.

Unilateral Option

Sum for Site

Installation Only

Unilateral Option Sum

for Acceptance

Including Project

ManagementNote 1

Contract Sum - Payable

Amount for Site

Installation Only


Amount for Acceptance

Including Project

Management

10% Holdback

Amount

Payable Amount

Less 10% Holdback

B.4.2.2 Site Installation Test Acceptance

B.4.2.2.Site 1 Baldwin Hills $ 176,002 $ 383,572 $ - $ - $ 38,357 $ 345,215

B.4.2.2.Site 2 Black Jack Peak $ 224,415 $ 489,081 $ - $ - $ 48,908 $ 440,173

B.4.2.2.Site 3 Bald Mountain $ 183,999 $ 401,000 $ - $ - $ 40,100 $ 360,900

B.4.2.2.Site 4 Blue Rock $ 184,527 $ 402,151 $ - $ - $ 40,215 $ 361,935

B.4.2.2.Site 5 Burnt Peak $ 178,515 $ 389,050 $ - $ - $ 38,905 $ 350,145

B.4.2.2.Site 6 Beverly Glen $ 115,889 $ 252,564 $ - $ - $ 25,256 $ 227,307

B.4.2.2.Site 7 Compton Court Building $ 96,255 $ 209,775 $ - $ - $ 20,978 $ 188,798

B.4.2.2.Site 8 Century Plaza $ 96,473 $ 210,249 $ - $ - $ 21,025 $ 189,224

B.4.2.2.Site 9 Claremont $ 73,209 $ 159,548 $ - $ - $ 15,955 $ 143,594

B.4.2.2.Site 10 Castro Peak $ 193,987 $ 422,769 $ - $ - $ 42,277 $ 380,492

B.4.2.2.Site 11 Dakin Peak $ 200,523 $ 437,013 $ - $ - $ 43,701 $ 393,312

B.4.2.2.Site 12 El Segundo PD $ 59,204 $ 129,027 $ - $ - $ 12,903 $ 116,125

B.4.2.2.Site 13 Encinal 1 (Fire Camp) $ 86,186 $ 187,832 $ - $ - $ 18,783 $ 169,048

B.4.2.2.Site 14 Green Mountain $ 203,689 $ 443,912 $ - $ - $ 44,391 $ 399,521

B.4.2.2.Site 15 Hauser Peak $ 197,139 $ 429,638 $ - $ - $ 42,964 $ 386,675

B.4.2.2.Site 16 Johnstone Peak $ 197,335 $ 430,065 $ - $ - $ 43,006 $ 387,058

B.4.2.2.Site 17 FS 28 $ 45,737 $ 99,678 $ - $ - $ 9,968 $ 89,710

B.4.2.2.Site 18 FS 56 $ 42,234 $ 92,042 $ - $ - $ 9,204 $ 82,838

B.4.2.2.Site 19 FS 71 $ 61,450 $ 133,923 $ - $ - $ 13,392 $ 120,531

B.4.2.2.Site 20 FS 72 $ 86,847 $ 189,270 $ - $ - $ 18,927 $ 170,343

B.4.2.2.Site 21 FS 77 $ 78,351 $ 170,756 $ - $ - $ 17,076 $ 153,680

B.4.2.2.Site 22 FS 84 $ 39,527 $ 86,144 $ - $ - $ 8,614 $ 77,530

B.4.2.2.Site 23 FS 91 $ 42,234 $ 92,042 $ - $ - $ 9,204 $ 82,838

B.4.2.2.Site 24 FS 99 $ 87,347 $ 190,361 $ - $ - $ 19,036 $ 171,325

B.4.2.2.Site 25 FS 119 $ 42,234 $ 92,042 $ - $ - $ 9,204 $ 82,838

B.4.2.2.Site 26 FS 144 $ 50,009 $ 108,988 $ - $ - $ 10,899 $ 98,090

B.4.2.2.Site 27 FS 149 $ 39,358 $ 85,776 $ - $ - $ 8,578 $ 77,198

B.4.2.2.Site 28 FS 157 $ 89,840 $ 195,795 $ - $ - $ 19,579 $ 176,215

B.4.2.2.Site 29 FS 169 $ 42,234 $ 92,042 $ - $ - $ 9,204 $ 82,838

B.4.2.2.Site 30 CP 9 $ 51,893 $ 113,093 $ - $ - $ 11,309 $ 101,783

B.4.2.2.Site 31 Del Valle Training $ 68,482 $ 149,247 $ - $ - $ 14,925 $ 134,323

B.4.2.2.Site 32 LA City Hall $ 102,929 $ 224,320 $ - $ - $ 22,432 $ 201,888

B.4.2.2.Site 33 Lower Blue Ridge $ 210,218 $ 458,142 $ - $ - $ 45,814 $ 412,328

B.4.2.2.Site 34 DWP Sylmar Water Ladder $ 45,519 $ 99,202 $ - $ - $ 9,920 $ 89,281

B.4.2.2.Site 35 Magic Mountain $ 217,931 $ 474,952 $ - $ - $ 47,495 $ 427,457

B.4.2.2.Site 36 Mount Disappointment $ 210,952 $ 459,740 $ - $ - $ 45,974 $ 413,766

B.4.2.2.Site 37 Mount Lee $ 225,470 $ 491,382 $ - $ - $ 49,138 $ 442,244

B.4.2.2.Site 38 Mira Loma Facility $ 112,343 $ 244,837 $ - $ - $ 24,484 $ 220,353

B.4.2.2.Site 39 Mount McDill $ 172,391 $ 375,702 $ - $ - $ 37,570 $ 338,132

B.4.2.2.Site 40 Mount Lukens $ 214,060 $ 466,514 $ - $ - $ 46,651 $ 419,863

B.4.2.2.Site 41 Mount Thom $ 94,813 $ 206,631 $ - $ - $ 20,663 $ 185,968

B.4.2.2.Site 42 Mount Washington $ 109,417 $ 238,458 $ - $ - $ 23,846 $ 214,612

B.4.2.2.Site 43 Monte Vista (Star Center) $ 99,553 $ 216,962 $ - $ - $ 21,696 $ 195,266

B.4.2.2.Site 44 Oat Mountain $ 78,416 $ 170,897 $ - $ - $ 17,090 $ 153,807

B.4.2.2.Site 45 Oat Mountain (City) $ 163,088 $ 355,427 $ - $ - $ 35,543 $ 319,885

B.4.2.2.Site 46 Oat Mountain Nike $ 99,110 $ 215,997 $ - $ - $ 21,600 $ 194,397

B.4.2.2.Site 47 Puente Hills $ 214,203 $ 466,826 $ - $ - $ 46,683 $ 420,143 B.4.2.2.Site 48 Portal Ridge $ 129,425 $ 282,063 $ - $ - $ 28,206 $ 253,857


PHASE 4 - LMR SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION

Deliverable/Task

/Section No. (Exhibit A, Exhibit B, or Base

Document)

Deliverable

Phase 4 Total

Exhibit C.5 (LMR System Implementation) Exhibit C.5 (Page 1 of 3) LA-RICS LMR Agreement



Qty.

Unilateral Option

Sum for Site

Installation Only


for Acceptance

Including Project

ManagementNote 1


Amount for Site

Installation Only



Including Project

Management

10% Holdback

Amount

Payable Amount

Less 10% Holdback



Deliverable/Task


Document)

Deliverable

Phase 4 Total

B.4.2.2.Site 49 Pomona 1620 Hillcrest $ 112,537 $ 245,258 $ - $ - $ 24,526 $ 220,732

B.4.2.2.Site 50 Redondo Beach PD $ 39,527 $ 86,144 $ - $ - $ 8,614 $ 77,530

B.4.2.2.Site 51 Rolling Hills Transmit $ 136,626 $ 297,759 $ - $ - $ 29,776 $ 267,983

B.4.2.2.Site 52 Rio Hondo $ 151,648 $ 330,495 $ - $ - $ 33,050 $ 297,446

B.4.2.2.Site 53 City Hall $ 37,725 $ 82,217 $ - $ - $ 8,222 $ 73,995

B.4.2.2.Site 54 San Augustine $ 123,518 $ 269,191 $ - $ - $ 26,919 $ 242,272

B.4.2.2.Site 55 San Dimas $ 114,799 $ 250,188 $ - $ - $ 25,019 $ 225,169

B.4.2.2.Site 56 Signal Hill $ 116,741 $ 254,422 $ - $ - $ 25,442 $ 228,980

B.4.2.2.Site 57 San Pedro Hill $ 177,978 $ 387,879 $ - $ - $ 38,788 $ 349,091

B.4.2.2.Site 58 Saddle Peak $ 200,031 $ 435,940 $ - $ - $ 43,594 $ 392,346

B.4.2.2.Site 59 Sunset Ridge $ 143,789 $ 313,369 $ - $ - $ 31,337 $ 282,032

B.4.2.2.Site 60 San Vicente Peak $ 173,138 $ 377,331 $ - $ - $ 37,733 $ 339,598

B.4.2.2.Site 61 Southwest Area Station $ 70,157 $ 152,898 $ - $ - $ 15,290 $ 137,608

B.4.2.2.Site 62 Topanga Peak $ 125,084 $ 272,603 $ - $ - $ 27,260 $ 245,342

B.4.2.2.Site 63 Tejon Peak $ 120,939 $ 263,571 $ - $ - $ 26,357 $ 237,214

B.4.2.2.Site 64 Tower Peak $ 179,547 $ 391,298 $ - $ - $ 39,130 $ 352,168

B.4.2.2.Site 65 Verdugo Peak (City) $ 119,052 $ 259,458 $ - $ - $ 25,946 $ 233,512

B.4.2.2.Site 66 Walker Drive $ 102,627 $ 223,661 $ - $ - $ 22,366 $ 201,295

B.4.2.2.Site 67 Whitaker Middle Peak $ 174,731 $ 380,803 $ - $ - $ 38,080 $ 342,723

B.4.2.2.Site 68 100 Wilshire $ 87,459 $ 190,606 $ - $ - $ 19,061 $ 171,545

B.4.2.2.Site 69 Whittaker Ridge $ 117,591 $ 256,273 $ - $ - $ 25,627 $ 230,646

B.4.2.2.Site 70 77TH Street Area Complex $ 27,593 $ 60,135 $ - $ - $ 6,013 $ 54,121

B.4.2.2.Site 71 Devonshire Area station $ 29,496 $ 64,282 $ - $ - $ 6,428 $ 57,854

B.4.2.2.Site 72 L.A. County Fire Command $ 173,763 $ 378,692 $ - $ - $ 37,869 $ 340,823 B.4.2.2.Site 73 Valley Dispatch Center $ 79,503 $ 173,265 $ - $ - $ 17,327 $ 155,939

$ 8,770,559 $ 19,114,236 $ - $ - $ 1,911,424 $ 17,202,813

B.4.1.1.1.5 Consoles 9 $ 58,462 $ - $ - $ 5,846 $ 52,616

B.4.1.1.1.5 Logging Recorder 1 $ 6,496 $ - $ - $ 650 $ 5,846

B.4.1.1.1.7 System Management and Monitoring Subsystem 1 Included in Phase 3 $ - $ -

B.1.15 Inventory and Maintenance Tracking Subsystem Included in Phase 3 $ - $ -

B.4.3 Training Included $ - $ -

B.4.1.2 Spares and Test Equipment 1 Included $ - $ -

B.4.2 Acceptance Testing 1 $ - $ - $ - $ -

B.4.2.3 Functional Test Acceptance 1 $ 423,142 $ - $ - $ 42,314 $ 380,828

B.4.2.4 Special Operational Test Acceptance 1 $ 1,375,212 $ - $ - $ 137,521 $ 1,237,690

B.4.2.5 Voice System Testing Acceptance 1 $ 528,928 $ - $ - $ 52,893 $ 476,035

B.4.2.6 Stress Test Acceptance 1 $ 105,786 $ - $ - $ 10,579 $ 95,207

B.4.2.8 Voice Wide Area Coverage Test Acceptance $ - $ -

B.4.2.8.Zone 1 Basin Zone Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 846,284 $ - $ - $ 84,628 $ 761,656

B.4.2.8.Zone 2 Northern Desert Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 740,499 $ - $ - $ 74,050 $ 666,449

B.4.2.8.Zone 3 Angeles National Forest Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 634,713 $ - $ - $ 63,471 $ 571,242

B.4.2.8.Zone 4 Santa Monica Mountains Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 423,142 $ - $ - $ 42,314 $ 380,828

B.4.2.8.Zone 5 CA-14 Corridor Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 423,142 $ - $ - $ 42,314 $ 380,828

B.4.2.8.Zone 6 Foothills Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 423,142 $ - $ - $ 42,314 $ 380,828

B.4.2.8.Zone 7 Catalina Island Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 317,357 $ - $ - $ 31,736 $ 285,621

B.4.2.9 Voice Aerial Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 105,786 $ - $ - $ 10,579 $ 95,207

B.4.2.10 Voice Waterway Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 211,571 $ - $ - $ 21,157 $ 190,414 B.4.2.13 Voice Railway Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 211,571 $ - $ - $ 21,157 $ 190,414

Phase 4 Subtotals Phase 4 - LMR System Implementation Per Site Detail




Qty.

Unilateral Option

Sum for Site

Installation Only


for Acceptance

Including Project

ManagementNote 1


Amount for Site

Installation Only



Including Project

Management

10% Holdback

Amount

Payable Amount

Less 10% Holdback



Deliverable/Task


Document)

Deliverable

Phase 4 Total

B.4.2.14 Voice Freeway Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 105,786 $ - $ - $ 10,579 $ 95,207

B.4.2.15 Voice Subscriber Access Test Acceptance 1 $ 105,786 $ - $ - $ 10,579 $ 95,207

B.4.2.17 Voice System Burn-in Test Acceptance 1 $ 105,786 $ - $ - $ 10,579 $ 95,207

B.4.2.18.1 NMDN Throughput Test Acceptance 1 $ 528,928 $ - $ - $ 52,893 $ 476,035

B.4.2.18.2 NMDN Wide Area Coverage Test Acceptance $ - $ -

B.4.2.18.2.Zone 1 Basin Zone Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 528,928 $ - $ - $ 52,893 $ 476,035

B.4.2.18.2.Zone 2 Northern Desert Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 423,142 $ - $ - $ 42,314 $ 380,828

B.4.2.18.2.Zone 3 Angeles National Forest Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 423,142 $ - $ - $ 42,314 $ 380,828

B.4.2.18.2.Zone 4 Santa Monica Mountains Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 211,571 $ - $ - $ 21,157 $ 190,414

B.4.2.18.2.Zone 5 CA-14 Corridor Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 211,571 $ - $ - $ 21,157 $ 190,414

B.4.2.18.2.Zone 6 Foothills Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 211,571 $ - $ - $ 21,157 $ 190,414

B.4.2.18.2.Zone 7 Catalina Island Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 105,786 $ - $ - $ 10,579 $ 95,207

B.4.2.18.5 NMDN Data Aerial Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 105,786 $ - $ - $ 10,579 $ 95,207

B.4.2.18.6 NMDN Fire Stn & Parking Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -

B.4.2.18.7 NMDN Freeway Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 105,786 $ - $ - $ 10,579 $ 95,207

B.4.2.18.8 NMDN Waterway Coverage Test Acceptance 1 $ 211,571 $ - $ - $ 21,157 $ 190,414

B.4.2.18.9 NMDN Projected Load Test Acceptance 1 $ 211,571 $ - $ - $ 21,157 $ 190,414

B.4.2.18.10 NMDN CAD Baseline System Test Acceptance 1 $ 105,786 $ - $ - $ 10,579 $ 95,207

B.4.2.18.11 NMDN Burn-in Test Acceptance 1 $ 105,786 $ - $ - $ 10,579 $ 95,207

B.4.4.1 Final Migration/Cutover Plan Delivered Included $ - $ - $ - $ -

B.4.5 Final System Support Plan Delivered Included $ - $ - $ - $ -

B.4.6 Final Disaster Recovery Plan Delivered Included $ - $ - $ - $ -

B.4.7 Final Special Event Plans Delivered Included $ - $ - $ - $ -

B.4.8 / Base.11.2.1 Final LMR System Acceptance

As provided for in

Base.11.2.1 $ - $ - $ - $ -

B.4.9 Final Warranty Plan Delivered Included $ - $ - $ - $ -

Credit for Services Performed in Phase 1 1 $ (765,576) $ - $ (76,558) $ (689,018)

Project Management 1 Included as Reflected $ - $ - $ - $ -

Base.22.3.2 Performance Bond 1 $ 99,722 $ - $ - $ - $ 99,722

Total Lease Costs $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Base.22.2.1 Liability Insurance (Professional and General) 1 $ 527,500 $ - $ - $ 527,500

$ 29,619,390.05 $ - $ - $ 2,899,217 $ 26,720,173

Note 1: Pursuant to Amendment No. Three, effective as of November ______, 2013, (a) Contractor's provision and implementation of certain equipment reflected in Exhibit C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments), as amended by Amendment

No. Three, was moved from Phases 3 and 4 to Phase 1; and (b) Contractor was engaged to provide and implement under Phase 1, certain additional equipment reflected in Exhibit C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments), as amended by

Amendment No. Three, (the equipment described in clauses (a) and (b) is collectively referred to as the "Specified Equipment").

In connection therewith, (i) a Unilateral Option Sum in the amount of $4,362,681 was moved from Schedules C.4 (Schedule of Payments Phase 3 – Supply LMR System Components) and C.5 (Schedule of Payments Phase 4 – System Implementation) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments) to

Schedule C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments), as amended by Amendment No. Three, and thereafter such Unilateral Option Sum was converted to a Contract Sum; and (ii) a Unilateral Option Sum in the amount of $1,285,230 was added to

Schedule C.2 (Schedule of Payments Phase 1 – System Design) to Exhibit C (Schedule of Payments), as amended by Amendment No. Three, and thereafter such Unilateral Option Sum was converted to a Contract Sum.

Total for Phase 4 - LMR System Implementation:



EXHIBIT F Agreement No. LA-RICS 007 – Amended and Restated under Amendment 3

Exhibit F (Administration of Agreement) Page F-1 of F-4 LA-RICS LMR Agreement

ADMINISTRATION OF AGREEMENT

1. Authority Key Personnel

1.1 Authority Project Director

Patrick J. Mallon

LA-RICS Executive Director



Telephone No.: (323) 881-8291

Email: [email protected]

Authority Project Director Designees:

Susy Orellana-Curtiss

LA-RICS Administrative Chief



Telephone No.: (323) 881-8292


Wendy Stallworth-Tait

LA-RICS Executive Assistant



Telephone No.: (323) 881-8311


1.2 Authority Project Manager

Skip Funk

LA-RICS Program Manager



Telephone No.: (904) 806-0221


Authority Project Manager Designee:

Rick Polehonka

LA-RICS Project Manager, Radio System Technology



Telephone No.: (619) 733-4016


mailto:[email protected]







2. Contractor Key Personnel

2.1 Contractor Project Director

Jim Hardimon

Motorola Project Director

725 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1855

Los Angeles, CA 90017

Telephone No.: (213) 362-6706


2.2 Contractor Project Manager

Lou Hennequin

Motorola Project Manager



Telephone No.: (858) 829-3102


2.3 Contractor Site Work Design Manager

Site Design and Construction Manager

Bob Brown

Construction Management Vice President (General Dynamics)



Telephone No.: (781) 727-3713


Mitchell J. Campagna

Site Architect Manager (Mitchell J. Architecture subcontracted to General Dynamics)

4883 Ronson Ct., Suite N

San Diego, CA 92111

Telephone No.: (858) 650-3130


2.4 Contractor Security Designees

Patsy Milroy

Motorola Quality Director



Telephone No.: (847) 343-6809









Jim Hardimon




Telephone No.: (213) 362-6706


2.5 Authorized Agents

Rick Castañeda

Vice President & Director



Telephone No.: (817) 320-0256


Signature: __________________________________

Authority Limit:

Jim Hardimon




Telephone No.: (213) 362-6706


Signature: __________________________________

Authority Limit: Amendments that do not increase the contract value by more than

$500,000.

Karl L. Zimmer

Director of System Integration

6450 Sequence Drive

San Diego, California 92121

Telephone No: (858) 368-3363


Signature: __________________________________

Authority Limit:







Tony Marshall

Vice President of Services, Americas Region

1301 E. Algonquin Road

Schaumburg, IL 60196

Telephone: (847) 576-4083


Signature: __________________________________

Authority Limit:

2.6 Contractor's Office

Local Office:



Telephone No.: (213) 362-6706


Headquarter Office:

1303 East Algonquin Road

Schaumburg IL, 60196

Telephone No.: (847) 576-5000





LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY 2525 Corporate Place, Suite 200 Monterey Park, California 91754 (323) 881-8291

PATRICK J. MALLON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

AGENDA ITEM 8

November 7, 2013 Board of Directors Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority (the "Authority") Dear Directors:

PERMIT TO ENTER COUNTY SITES FOR LOCATING EQUIPMENT PURCHASE – PHASE 1 SUBJECT Board approval is requested for delegated authority to the Executive Director to complete negotiations and execute in substantially similar form, the attached Permit to Enter with the County of Los Angeles for County sites deploying equipment purchased in Phase 1 of Agreement No. LA-RICS 007 for the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System ("LA-RICS") - Land Mobile Radio System. The Board previously approved on August 15, 2013, the purchase and use of this equipment. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR BOARD: Authorize the Executive Director to complete negotiations and execute in substantially similar form, the attached Permit to Enter with the County of Los Angeles, to allow for the deployment of this equipment purchased in Phase 1 to occur at County sites. PURPOSE/JUSTIFICATION OF RECOMMENDED ACTION On August 15, 2013, the Board delegated authority to the Executive Director to execute Agreement No. LA-RICS 007 with Motorola Solutions, Inc. (Motorola), and further approved the purchase and use during Phase 1, of certain telecommunications equipment to facilitate the timely spend of UASI 009 grant funds. This equipment has been ordered, and will be installed at existing County telecommunications sites as set forth in the attached Permit to Enter. The County requires third parties entering County property to execute a Permit to Enter. The Board’s delegation of authority to the Executive Director to execute the Permit to Enter will allow the Authority and Motorola to enter the County sites and temporarily locate, install, configure, operate, maintain and eventually relocate, telecommunications equipment owned by LA-RICS inside the County’s equipment shelters and other structures. The Permit to Enter also makes clear that the equipment installed by LA-RICS will remain LA-RICS property. The attached Permit to Enter will be replaced once the Authority successfully executes site access agreement(s)with the County of Los Angeles for the LA-RICS. .

LA-RICS Board of DirectorsMeeting of November 7 ,2013Page 2

ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION

On August 15,2013, the Board approved the execution of Agreement No. LA-RICS 007 and

approvãd the purchase and use of certain designated equipment in Phase 1. With respect to

the equipment purchase, your Board determined on this date that the purchase and use of this

equipment was categoricálty exempt under CEQA Guidelines. A Notice of Exemption (NOE)

*"r iiled on August ZZ, ZO|S. There have been no changes to the scope of or the anticipated

use of this equifment since approval. The recommended actions are within the scope of the

previously filed NOE.

FISGAL IM PACT/FI NANCING

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

FACTS AND PROVISIONS/LEGAL REQUIREMENT

The Authority's counsel has reviewed the recommended action.

AG REEM E NTS/CONTRACTI NG

The recommended action will authorize the Executive Director to execute the Permit to Enter

with the County of Los Angeles.

Respectfully submitted,l'1

-r/i*rL /"i?,^lá-'PATRIC6;J: MALLONEXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

c: Counsel to the Authority

Attachment

Permittee’s Initials ________ Page 1 of 9

LA-RICS AUTHORITY AGENDA ITEM 8 – ATTACHMENT A

“To Enrich Lives Through Effective And Caring Service” “To Enrich Lives Through Effective And Caring Service”

PERMIT TO ENTER Permittee: Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority ("LA RICS Authority") 2525 Corporate Place, 2nd Floor Monterey Park, California 91754 Attention: Patrick J. Mallon, Executive Director Telephone: (323) 881-8291

Permit No. ______________ Chapter 2.08 Consideration: Gratis Expiration: Four (4) years after execution of permit fully executed Chris Montana, Manager Property Management Telephone: (213) 974-4200 FAX: (213) 217-4968

1. PREMISES: Permittee, after execution by the Chief Executive Officer, is hereby

granted permission to enter the following County properties (collectively, the "Premises"), located at:

Site ID Facility Name Address Line City State

FCCF L.A. County Fire Command 1320 N Eastern Ave. Los Angeles CA

SCC Sheriff Comm. Center 1277 N. Eastern Ave. Los Angeles CA

JPK Johnstone Peak Angeles National Forest San Dimas CA

MMC Mount McDill N/A Palmdale CA

OAT Oat Mountain N/A Chatsworth CA

RHT Rolling Hills Transmit 5741 W Crestridge Rd. Rancho Palos Verdes CA

RIH Rio Hondo Near Workmanmill Road Whittier CA

VPK Verdugo N/A Glendale CA

The Premises are all existing telecommunication sites owned by County. Entry

constitutes acceptance by Permittee of all conditions and terms of this Permit. 2. PURPOSE: The sole purpose of this Permit is to allow Permittee and its

contractor, Motorola Solutions, Inc., to enter the Premises and temporarily locate, install, configure, operate, maintain, and eventually relocate, telecommunications

Board of Supervisors GLORIA MOLINA First District MARK RIDLEY-THOMAS Second District ZEV YAROSLAVSKY Third District DON KNABE Fourth District MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH Fifth District

County of Los Angeles CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE

REAL ESTATE DIVISION 222 South Hill Street, 3rd Floor, Los Angeles, California 90012

(213) 974-4300 http://ceo.lacounty.gov

WILLIAM T FUJIOKA Chief Executive Officer

HOA.1020212.2Permittee’s Initials ________ Page 2 of 9

LA-RICS AUTHORITY

equipment owned by Permittee (collectively, the "Permitted Activities") inside the County's equipment shelters and other appurtenant structures. The telecommunications equipment that will be located on the Premises is identified on Exhibit “A” (hereinafter "Equipment").

3. TERM: This Permit shall commence upon execution by the County and terminate

four (4) years thereafter. 4. CONSIDERATION: Consideration for this Permit shall be Permittee’s faithful

performance of its obligations under this Permit. 5. OWNERSHIP OF EQUIPMENT: All Equipment placed by Permittee on the

Premises, shall remain the property of Permittee. Nothing herein shall be construed to permit County to take any right, title, or interest in the Equipment located by Permittee on the Premises.

6. ADDITIONAL CHARGES: Permittee agrees to pay any charges for utilities that

may be required and for the safekeeping of the Premises for the prevention of any accidents as a result of the Permittee's activities thereon.

7. NOTICE: Notices desired or required to be given by this Permit or by any law

now or hereinafter in effect may be given by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, addressed to the party for whom intended and depositing such envelope with postage prepaid in the U.S. Post Office or any substation thereof, or any public letter box, and any such notice and the envelope containing the same shall be addressed to Permittee as follows:

LA RICS Authority 2525 Corporate Place, 2nd Floor Monterey Park, California 91754

Attention: Patrick J. Mallon, Executive Director

or such other place in California as may hereinafter be designated in writing by the Permittee. The Notices, Certificates of Insurance and Envelopes containing the same to County shall be addressed to:

County of Los Angeles Chief Executive Office, Real Estate Division 222 South Hill Street, Third Floor Los Angeles, California 90012 Attention: Chris Montana, Manager, Property Management

8. INDEMNIFICATION: Permittee agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless

County, its Special Districts, agents, elected and appointed officers and employees from and against any and all liability, expense, including defense costs and legal fees, and claims for damages of any nature whatsoever, including, but not limited to, bodily injury, death, personal injury, property damage, including damage to County property, or statutory or regulatory violations arising from or connected with Permittee's operations, or its services hereunder, including any Workers' Compensation suits, liability, or expense,


LA-RICS AUTHORITY

arising from or connected with services performed by or on behalf of Permittee by any person pursuant to this Permit.

9. GENERAL INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS: Without limiting Permittee’s

indemnification of County, Permittee shall provide and maintain, or shall cause its contractors to provide and maintain, the following types and limits of insurance. Such insurance shall be primary to and not contributing with any other insurance or self-insurance programs maintained by County, and such coverage shall be provided and maintained at Permittee’s or its contractors' own expense.

a. Evidence of Insurance: Certificate(s) or other evidence of coverage

satisfactory to County shall be delivered to the County of Los Angeles prior to Permittee's entry. Such certificates or other evidence shall identify this Permit, clearly evidence all required coverages, and permittee shall provide County with, or permittee’s insurance policies shall contain a provision that County shall receive, written notice of cancellation or any change in Required Insurance, including insurer, limits of coverage, term of coverage or policy period. The written notice shall be provided to County at least ten (10) days in advance of cancellation for non-payment of premium and ten (10) days in advance for any other cancellation or policy change. Failure to provide written notice of cancellation or any change in Required Insurance may constitute a material breach of the Permit, in the sole discretion of the County, upon which the County may suspend or terminate this Permit.

b. Insurer Financial Ratings: Insurance is to be provided by an insurance

company acceptable to the County with an A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII, unless otherwise approved by County.

c. Permittee's failure to maintain or to provide acceptable evidence that it

maintains the Required Insurance shall constitute a material breach of the Permit, upon which County immediately may suspend or terminate this Permit. County, at its sole discretion, may obtain damages from Permittee resulting from said breach. Alternatively, the County may purchase the Required Insurance, and without further notice to Permittee, pursue Permittee for reimbursement.

d. Notification of Incidents, Claims or Suits: Permittee shall report to County

any accident or incident relating to Permittee’s entry which involves injury or property damage which may result in the filing of a claim or lawsuit against Permittee and/or County in writing within 24 hours of occurrence.

10. INSURANCE COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS:

a. General Liability insurance (written on ISO policy form CG 00 01 or its equivalent), naming County as an additional insured, with limits of not less than the following:

General Aggregate: $2 million Products/Completed Operations Aggregate: $1 million Personal and Advertising Injury: $1 million


LA-RICS AUTHORITY

Each Occurrence: $1 million

b. Automobile Liability insurance (written on ISO policy form CA 00 01 or its equivalent) with a limit of liability of not less than $1 million for each accident. Such insurance shall include coverage for all “owned”, “hired” and “non-owned” vehicles, or coverage for “any auto”, as appropriate.

c. Workers Compensation and Employers’ Liability insurance providing

workers compensation benefits, as required by the Labor Code of the State of California or by any other state, and for which Permittee is responsible. If Permittee’s employees will be engaged in maritime employment, coverage shall provide workers compensation benefits as required by the U.S. Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, Jones Act or any other federal law for which Permittee is responsible.

In all cases, the above insurance also shall include Employers’ Liability coverage with limits of not less than the following:

Each Accident: $1 million Disease - policy limit: $1 million Disease - each employee: $1 million

11. OPERATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES: Permittee shall:

a. Comply with and abide by all applicable rules, regulations and directions

of County. b. Comply with all applicable City and County ordinances and all State and

Federal laws, and in the course thereof obtain and keep in effect all permits and licenses required to conduct the permitted activities on the Premises.

c. Maintain the Premises and surrounding area in a clean and sanitary

condition to the satisfaction of County. d. Conduct the Permitted Activities in a courteous and non-profane manner;

operate without interfering with the use of the Premises by County. County has the right to request Permittee to remove any agent, servant or employee who fails to conduct the Permitted Activities in the manner heretofore described.

e. Assume the risk of loss, damage or destruction to any and all fixtures and

personal property belonging to Permittee that are installed or placed within the area occupied.

f. Repair or replace any and all County or City property lost, damaged, or

destroyed as a result of or connected with the conduct or activities of the Permittee. Should Permittee fail to promptly make repairs, County may have repairs made and Permittee shall pay costs.


LA-RICS AUTHORITY

g. Pay charges for installation and service costs for all utilities used for the conduct of the Permitted Activities, if needed.

h. Except for the purpose described in Section 2, Permittee agrees to restore

the Premises, prior to the termination of this Permit, and to the satisfaction of County, to the conditions that existed prior to the commencement of the Permitted Activities, excepting ordinary wear and tear or damage or destruction by the acts of God beyond the control of Permittee. This shall include removal of all rubbish and debris, as well as structures placed on the Premises by Permittee in order that the Premises will be neat and clean and ready for normal use by County on the day following the termination of this Permit. Should Permittee fail to accomplish this, County may perform the work and Permittee shall pay the cost.

i. Allow County to enter the Premises at any time to determine compliance

with the terms of this Permit, or for any other purpose incidental to the performance of the responsibilities of the Chief Executive Office.

j. Provide all security devices required for the protection of the fixtures and

personal property used in the conduct of the Permitted Activities from theft, burglary or vandalism, provided written approval for the installation thereof is first obtained from the Chief Executive Office.

k. Prohibit all advertising signs or matter from display at the Premises, other

than signs displaying the name of Permittee.

l. Prohibit the sale of food.

m. Keep a responsible representative of the Permittee available on the Premises during all permitted hours. This person shall carry copies of this Permit and the receipt for consideration herein, for display upon request.

12. INDEPENDENT STATUS: This Permit is by and between County and Permittee

and is not intended and shall not be construed, to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association as between County and Permittee. Permittee understands and agrees to bear the sole responsibility and liability for furnishing Workers' Compensation benefits to any person for injuries arising from or connected with services performed on behalf of Permittee pursuant to this Permit.

13. EMPLOYEES: All references to the "Permittee" in the Permit are deemed to

include the employees, agents, assigns, contractors, and anyone else involved in any manner in the exercise of the rights therein given to the undersigned Permittee.

14. LIMITATIONS: It is expressly understood that in permitting the right to use said

Premises, no estate or interest in real property is being conveyed to Permittee, and that the right to use is only a nonexclusive, revocable and unassignable permission to occupy the premises in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Permit for the purpose of conducting the permitted activities.


LA-RICS AUTHORITY

15. ASSIGNMENT: This Permit is personal to Permittee, and in the event Permittee shall attempt to assign or transfer the same in whole or part, all rights hereunder shall immediately terminate.

16. AUTHORITY TO STOP: In the event that an authorized representative of the

County finds that the activities being held on the Premises unnecessarily or unduly interfere with County business on the site or endanger the health or safety of persons on or near said property, the representative may require that this Permit immediately be terminated until said interfering or endangering activities cease, or until such action is taken to eliminate or prevent the interference or endangerment.

17. DEFAULT: Permittee agrees that if default shall be made in any other terms and

conditions herein contained, County may forthwith revoke and terminate this Permit.

18. ALTERATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS: Permittee has examined the Premises

and knows the condition thereof. Permittee accepts the Premises in the present state and condition and waives any and all demand upon the County for alteration, repair, or improvement thereof. Permittee shall make no alteration or improvements to the Premises, except those identified in Section 2 hereof, without prior written approval from the County, and any fixtures and/or personal property incidental to the purposes described in Section 2 hereof shall be removed by Permittee prior to the termination of this Permit, and in the event of the failure to do so, title thereto shall vest in County. All betterments to the Premises shall become the property of County upon the termination of this Permit.

19. COUNTY LOBBYIST ORDINANCE: Permittee is aware of the requirements of

Chapter 2.160 of the Los Angeles County Code with respect to County Lobbyists as such are defined in Section 2.160.010 of said Code, and certifies full compliance therewith. Failure to fully comply shall constitute a material breach upon which County may terminate or suspend this Permit.

20. INTERPRETATION: Unless the context of this Permit clearly requires otherwise:

(i) the plural and singular numbers shall be deemed to include the other; (ii) the masculine, feminine and neuter genders shall be deemed to include the others; (iii) “or” is not exclusive; and (iv) “includes" and “including” are not limiting.

21. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Permit contains the entire agreement between the

parties hereto, and no addition or modification of any terms or provisions shall be effective unless set forth in writing, signed by both County and Permittee.

22. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: Time is of the essence for each and every term,

condition, covenant, obligation and provision of this Permit. 23. POWER AND AUTHORITY: The Permittee has the legal power, right and

authority to enter into this Permit, and to comply with the provisions hereof. The individuals executing this Permit on behalf of any legal entity comprising Permittee have the legal power, right and actual authority to bind the entity to the terms and conditions of this Permit.


LA-RICS AUTHORITY

24. SURVIVAL OF COVENANTS: The covenants, agreements, representations and

warranties made herein are intended to survive the termination of the Permit.


LA-RICS AUTHORITY

PERMITTEE: LA-RICS AUTHORITY By: _________________________________

Patrick J. Mallon, Executive Director who hereby personally covenants, guarantees and warrants that he/she has the power and authority to obligate the Permittee to the terms and conditions in this Permit.

Please sign before a Notary Public and return for approval. Upon approval, a signed copy will be mailed to Permittee.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES On______________, before me, _________________________________________________personally appeared _____________________________________ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. _______________________________

(Notary Public Signature) (Notary Public Seal) Pursuant to Chapter 2.08 of the Los Angeles County Code, this Permit has been executed on behalf of the County of Los Angeles by the Chief Executive Officer on the _____ day of ________________, 2013. PERMITTER: ATTEST: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEAN C. LOGAN WILLIAM T FUJIOKA Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk Chief Executive Officer BY: ___________________________ BY:____________________________ Deputy Christopher M. Montana Acting Director of Real Estate APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN F. KRATTLI County Counsel By______________________________ Deputy County Counsel


LA-RICS AUTHORITY

EXHIBIT A

EQUIPMENT LIST The following equipment will be installed and located at the Premises: (1) core hardware and software that consist of the main central voice/data network controllers, servers, software, network routers and switches; (2) 11-Channel, UHF repeaters, voice/data network controller, software, network router and switches; (3) 6-Channel, 700 MHz repeaters, voice/data network controller, software, network router and switches; and (4) three (3) digital radio dispatch consoles.

Site ID Facility Name Equipment

FCCF L.A. County Fire

Command

Core hardware and software that consist of the main central voice/data network controllers, servers, software, network routers, switches, and two digital radio dispatch consoles.

SCC Sheriff Comm. Center One digital radio dispatch console

JPK Johnstone Peak

11-Channel, UHF repeaters, voice/data network controller, software, network router and switches and 6-Channel, 700 MHz repeaters, voice/data network controller, software, network router and switches

MMC Mount McDill 11-Channel, UHF repeaters, voice/data network controller, software, network router and switches

OAT Oat Mountain 11-Channel, UHF repeaters, voice/data network controller, software, network router and switches

RHT Rolling Hills Transmit

11-Channel, UHF repeaters, voice/data network controller, software, network router and switches and 6-Channel, 700 MHz repeaters, voice/data network controller, software, network router and switches

RIH Rio Hondo 11-Channel, UHF repeaters, voice/data network controller, software, network router and switches

VPK Verdugo 6-Channel, 700 MHz repeaters, voice/data network controller, software, network router and switches

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM ... · 07-11-2013 · review under CEQA...

Documents

Transcript of LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM ... · 07-11-2013 · review under CEQA...