Lorenzo Chiesa - Hyperstructuralism's necessity of contingency

8/23/2019 Lorenzo Chiesa - Hyperstructuralism's necessity of contingency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lorenzo-chiesa-hyperstructuralisms-necessity-of-contingency 1/19

S: Journal o he Jan van Eyck Circle or Lacanian Ideology Criique 3 (2010): 159-177

L o r e n z o C h i e s a

H Y P E R S R U C U R A L I S M ’ S N E C E S S I Y O FC O N I N G E N C Y

Neessity and Contingeny oday

D , pp xp m - , w p -m pb m. S m m m p. I , m mj w , b , w pp , mb -

. O , pp m’ w w pbb b w bt - p bw w m, ‘B’, ‘ m pb m m b xp-b pbb m’ ‘m pp p-m pm,’1 pp - ‘ m’ ‘’ , w m Dw bpm , , ‘ b pm, pbm- m, b w m m m- .’2

O , ’ mm (p-)p- - b m pb w p

mp m b m w b . E m-p G Amb’ Sj Žž’ p p mt

1. G. M, Kluge: Te Haphazard Evolution o the Human Mind (L: Fb Fb,2008) 7. M, P P Nw Y U w m m p, , m b, pp.2. D. J. L, Te Aidental Mind. How Brain Evolution Has Given Us Love, Memory,Dreams, and God (Cmb MA: Bp H, 2007) 3. L P N- J Hp S M



Chiesa: Hyperstruturalism’s Neessity o Contingeny S3 (2010): 160

p . W b w mp , p pp ( , pmm ). A Amb, ‘m ’ p x xp m m b m mp m bp— mpm m w ‘ m’— m - ‘m’ C P.3 F m , w b b- w pp, p m’ bmp, b m p pp— p tout ourt —

m px W .C , Žž’ - ‘mm p’ mxb m p H’ , , m p, pp C. T t m mm. O mp p bw w w mp ppp p .4

I , w w F , J-C M Q Mx, p t. T t’ 2006 b, Aer Finitude —w b , , An Essay on the Neessity o the Contingeny — p b b pbw p, w b m p. Mx’ t pp pbb mm b p w m w ‘Hm’ pbm’; p , x ‘w pb ’ b ‘w x .’5I p, m pp w ‘- ’ ppp w p-K pp , b /pp m ; b w b , ‘-’—b — x pm . I , Mx’

3. G Amb, Il Regno e la Gloria (V: N P, 2007) 3144. S p, Sj Žž, ‘T F F W: A M P HR C,’ S. Žž & J. Mb (.), Te Monstrosity o Christ (Cm-b MA: MI P, 2009). F x m Žž’ppp H’ pp , L C, ‘Cm mmm? L’éém mx mxm éé Žž,’ R. M (.),Autour de Slavoj Žž: Psycanalyse, Marxisme, Idéalisme Allemand [A Mx C- ] (P U F, 2010) 44-67.5. . Mx, Aer Finitude (L: Cm, 2008) 90.




b b bw pp w, w m m, m p mp. L b , b mp , w ppb m b ‘ ’ ‘ w .’6

W M, I w m m- m m w— m-1990— m mp pp m Ep . E ,p b L’Œuvre laire (1995) Le périple strutural (2002; 2008), b b ‘ thesei,’ - m phusei ( ‘ ’)7 b ; , p mp, ‘m - ’ w p .8 M p, M, w struturalism , p, L p ‘p-m,’ pbm pp - bw , , m G w m b G . I w w, ‘ m w: m p w mm [bw phusei thesei ] x. I m m p w wb tb thesei b bj G m. A w b thesei b phusei , w w

.’9 Fm m mp, b ‘ p thesis ,’ pmm p b pp bw physis , , , , w ‘m px’ w, mm, p w . W m , bmmp p thesei ‘’ w ‘mb w m pp pp: b bj p m A.’10

M’ p-m, ww p m 1960, w p-p p p p b p;

p b thesei b pp w , p, L - b m m px. A I w , M’

6. Aer Finitude , 9; 92.7. J-C M, Le périple strutural (L: V, 2008) 280.8. Le périple strutural , 362.9. Le périple strutural , 300.10. Le périple strutural , 301.




20 pp, w b b p, b .

I b b w M’ Mx’ m mp pp ppp , m m, mm . I w m w pm , b,b m mp pm w m w -— — mp . A m- pj m b m pp bj. Mx pmp w bw pp ; m b b m t ‘ w w— / — b mp w w j m , b w m , .’ 11 p b, pp m mp w p p . O , M mpp b b m mpbw . Fw L’ w pm, m p- — ‘-pp’— p m ,— px—xp m w. Sm , a ortiori,L p qua ‘pm’ m ‘x G-m’12 [galiléisme étendu ] , w p m bw

b , p thesis physis .

F M, w p -, m, ‘p m mm w p b b m w — b — mm w, b , bm m ’;13 M m , w p mp Op mpx. M mp, p-p, w pm w p ( m m ), p pb b- m ; ‘-’14 [hors-univers ], m’ p m b p

x p pp, b . P- absolute ontingeny p b. I , w thesei , -— O B m b p— mp—

11. Aer Finitude , 10.12. S , J-C M, L’Œuvre laire (P: S, 1995) 111.13. L’Œuvre laire, 152.14. L’Œuvre laire, 153.




m mp— mj m, p L p, mp .

M m , p m p b pp, Mx’ p m ppp ( m p ) -m b M.15 I pp I w, w, thesei p b L’ p p-m p b x.

Struturalism as Extended Galileanism

A M, m m m p-m m G ; m b G-m xm , xp m m -ppp w m w . F m, , p mm, - w b . G-m p physis —.. w x p m’ —w m w mp bj . T m p- mp mm . I w,

G, ‘ b b [substane sensible ] w ’ mmm.’16 T p w w pmp ‘-’ ‘-’ b . O , , physis b , b m’ w pp - bw w — - mm— w — mmb. T ‘-’ w, m m, mp ‘-,’ w w m w . O , m m’ pb b mt, px bj b b mm w m’ m orrelative . G pp

‘-’ w, m m, mm m b w ontingently given . p , m mp b w m ‘ ’ - . M p: , m, ‘ b mm w [ ] mp, mp,

15. A w pp L C, For Laan: Siene, Logi, Politis (Cmb MA: MI P, m 2012).16. Le périple strutural , 287-8.




j m w [ ] p, , .’ 17 M p, w , m b b p, neessary qua mmb bj pp bw ‘-.’T, w p mm, bt mm -, m ‘requires mm bj; bj b mm . T, b p’; , w , ‘ , m p, b m mm, w [bj] mb m w ; w mp, , pb

mp.’18

Ip w bj ‘-’ , m ’ mm bj’ ‘-.’

O b pm m m- , M w mp : m G , bj , t mp bb w m physis/thesis , w - w m’ . A , bw w p ( ) b mpm. A —, , m p b— -. Hw, m , p ;

bw physis thesis , p mp physis . C, m — , , p m— m b, b -, -mmb. B, , w w m m - mp G w b p-m m m w, p p p physis/thesis , p bmt physis p. p mp, , b m b ; thesei b phusei ; pb m pmm m , m m ‘m .’19 M — w , w ,

p ( ) b-p—w pm f- .

I , p w, m pb m, G . I j physis/thesis m m thesei m b b-

17. Le périple strutural, 291.18. Le périple strutural , 289 (m mp).19. Le périple strutural, 299.




j mm G . M’ m m , thesis without , , p

physis , m extended Gm. B , thesis b m - p w ‘ p.’20 F, thesis b m ; , in primis Mxm, , m w b mp m mb b m. S, thesis bm bm bj; ‘’ . T, ( ) m -

thesis , w m m; t b , p m-m w b mm m. F, - thesis physis . F, w m thesis ; w , m px p .

Fw M’ w , I w m b pp- , , p; m thesis p p w L’ hyper -m. I p, w p m, x Gm, x mm, w w

mm b mm. M p, x mm- m ‘m t. P : t p w b ; p w w w w t; , b, pb w mp p b .’21 W p, mp mp m m, pp p, diferene . A b - -p mp w, m pp m - p mb,w , , w p b pm. F, p, m b b w ‘b’ [oupure ]. I m, , w -

- bw thesei phusei , thesis p ‘pm’ b.22

M b b p m mp w, , pm mm . W mm m b m w -

20. Le périple strutural , 301.21. Le périple strutural , 305-6.22. Le périple strutural , 335-6.




: ’ m’ mm m de -mm, w w m x m m extending Gm? C, ’ -m’ pm minimalism— ‘ p bj’23 (.. thesis m , w w b )— m m ideal ? I , w b x Gm -, m (-x) G- . W m mpm b p,

m m, b -b m. L’ w pbm. O , mm p b m b m-m b mm, b t p w w -pb mm . p mp, m b b mm w m b . O , m’ pm m m mm x-m m—b p xm pm —w , p Ppp, G -mm. I , mp— pb m b m b b p b— mp, , p.24

I M b w w w ‘’ m , mp. T t b b mxm x ( thesis p b bpp all m ) mm mp ( m p j one m xm p- pp—.. m -— ). A M , w xp A’ m: ‘ mp [ ] x,’ w, I w p , x mp, ‘ [].’25

I , m , m, ‘ pb m f - b ?’26 A M, w, , w p p w , mp p pj, w L. I

23. Le périple strutural , 340.24. Le périple strutural , 338-40.25. Le périple strutural , 341.26. Le périple strutural, 341.




p L p b p-m.

Hyper-struturalism, or, Te Subjet as Struture’s External Inlusion

A pm F p, L p any — ‘ thesis ’ m b - —m mm pp w m neessary .27 Tm subjet pp . WM p p, w b , L, m b f b .Up, bj —w m pp m m— b the pp px, w I , w w p w: mm bj ‘x .’28

F m b, w w w w L m - j p bj. H b p pm mp ’ mmm. WM ‘ ’ p t b bt ppb m p . A w p xp, m

p w , m m mmmb m xm ( m p-m); m bj, m pp ( mw mp ); , m pp bj— bt, pp bj’ m— - w m b m ( b pp). I w, , ‘ , w pp,’29 w j - . B, , b p f ondition b , b b pp p. R, is tout-ourt , w m mp m .

L’ pm p w m-p. I w m ppm ’ - w w p bj w bj pp w,

27. M’ m p F xm : ‘L -M’ m p F xm : ‘L -‘L -L - ppéé -’ (Le périple strutural , 346; L’Œuvre laire, 104).28. L’Œuvre laire , 105. M mp L’ w m , bj the pp , px ‘x ’ (L’Œuvre laire , 9).29. L’Œuvre laire , 99.




m m, m distinguishable m . I, , L p jm ’ xm mmm, -, b p p mmm bj pp tmp pp .M p, m p bj, p mm m, unidimensional win praesentia , , M xp, b ‘p , ,’30 w . G b S’ w x—m pm; — p w L w mt ‘ m-’:

b b , t ; , p w m (mpm, j, p , .).31 T m xm mmm p pp. N L- w pp m — — b , b w , , ause w pp. I w, ‘ have pp, b makes m: ,’32 .

A , L’ m— m-mm—mm bj mb pp p -m , , pm. T

pp x m, bj, w b ( - w ) ’m, w. T bj bm m : m , mm , bw m, m pp pp, pp m m.33 M p: ‘T bj bm pp […]: , , bj; b bj m b m Y w X Z .’34 I L j, m bj mp w p , , , w .H, w b b pp bt w p bj L’ p-m px:

bj w p—.. pb m w —b m externally —, w J-A M’ m m 1966

30. Le périple strutural , 216-7.31. S Le périple strutural , 216-7.32. L’Œuvre laire , 103.33. SS Le périple strutural , 228-9.34. L’Œuvre laire , 105-6.




‘S,’ b ‘ [ ] m w , m -; , w , p mp b.’ 35

H , M , pm’ m ‘ ’ m m . T p bj, x bj pp- , , , . p mp, bj m pp b, w j , bdedued m : ‘ b m w [] w - b , b ( ).’36 T bw bj, bjm w b bj mm -bj pp, w M ‘’37 L’ p- -b S, b , wCm — , m , p- —. A m’ m , Cm p , ‘ w -mb ’;38 m m, m pp L, m b m , b , ,mp b—’ b m w w .’39 T Cm mp - ( w-w w ‘’) w

p thesis physis , m mp, b p b pm’ - ( thesis ) w real as suc— , w b p bj mp . A L p SmXVI, ‘ b w m , […] I w mp.’40

T mt b pp w . F w, I wm m , L, p bw - bj b xp — b p m w w mp p— absolute . M m w, p-

p Cm’ mp L’ , mp

35. J.-A. M, ‘S: Em L S,’ Sreen 18 (W 1978):24-34.36. Le périple strutural , 347.37. Le périple strutural , 352.38. Le périple strutural , 351.39. Le périple strutural , 352.40. L, Le séminaire. Livre XVI. D’un Autre à l’autre (P: S, 2006) 30.




, t, ‘ ,’41 m w b m bj m. Y, L . T w b bj bj m mp , , m ‘ ’— - x, M m xp w L’ b Ppp.42 N, bj b f pm m m m: w b -’ -pm. W m b xp b -

bw b w bj pp mp p b m ’ bj/bj m.

Psycoanalysis and Siene

I w L p bj ( - pp) w bj m ( )? W p ‘bj ’ m m p? I , mp b m pp w .43 I M’ b m m m mmb w m : , w

w L’ pm m mp pm b w ‘dotrinal de siene ,’ , ‘-

j pp bj’;44 , p wp p j pm m. M b L m b axiom bj—’ bj, m m mp ’—w b w hy-

pothesis p w bj o siene —’m , m, m m bj’— t m m, w p.45 I b, m dotrinal de siene m bjtout-ourt bj m ; , m p p p w b

m m m m m xm bj. L’ w-w m w ‘ bj

41. Le périple strutural , 353.42. L’Œuvre laire , 61.43. F b, J. G & Y. S (.), Laanand Siene (L: K, 2002). I -Ap x, w R R ’ w bw L p,K p p ‘ m’ .44. L’Œuvre laire , 42.45. L’Œuvre laire , 33-4.




p wm w p p b bj ’ b p x.46 O , pm tmp bj mp : bj b F m b L’ - mp ‘ ’ p . P , , pm m w G-C pmm mm mm p wm b m p mmbj w . Pp b Dm m ogito -.

M m pm, I w M m p p ‘ p- ?’ b ‘w p?,’47 , I , w w mp mp p-— p— G mmm? A p p p , m m L’ w : b p m b w b ppp b mm . T p w mj —b pbb- -mm m — , , w x p m p.I , M m :

bj b m Ppp’ m m pp b mp - , , Ppp pm’ bj m mpm. I xm bj x -p b bj , bj m m mp xpb bj .

W m p M’ m wL’ mp , p x-p ‘S ’ (1966). I f b p p ‘ ’— b pm p w m mp-

— w , m , mbm bpp m ‘ ,’ b b ‘ p- ’ (pm, w m, b ‘w p?’).48 B , L, bj —.. bj p w-—w w p b

46. J. L, ‘S ,’ Érits (Nw Y/L: N, 2006) 729.47. L’Œuvre laire , 37.48. L’Œuvre laire , 35-6.




( bj). L m w - b mt ‘ bj wm w p p b bj .’ A M x mm b dotrinal de siene xm bj, m p mp p, b . L’ x w: ‘ bj pwm w p p b bj may seem

paradoxial .’49 W apparent px L ? O ,p bj m — bj m G C-

ogito— bw w . O , m - (pm), , w m m, b m bj (m ) bj. T pp px w: bw p , b bw . W xp m p.

A L, m tmp ‘’ bj , m mp w, b , m, , b pb m Gö’ m mp- C’ . C, ‘ bj [ ]m , b m b b bj.’50 T p m

‘S ,’ w M , pb m w j : bj pp p w w m b m ‘antinomi orrelate ’ , , m p, mp bj. I w, p ’ b-

j, bt m—L b b ‘S ’—w m bj p. T t bj . T bj p, , bj , bj b - b bw w , w ppp m ‘x ’ bj . T w m : m

, -m p mpm m .51 T m p ‘ ’52—.. - C b

49. ‘S ,’ 729 (m mp).50. ‘S ,’ 731.51. S J. L, Sm XII, ‘Pbèm x p p,’ 1964-1965, pb-, J 9, 1965.52. J. L, Sm IX, ‘I,’ 1961-1962, pb, Nmb 29,1961.




w— m b p bj ’ own w : p b, - w m w b mpm, m m w. H w pppx p’ w p m: ‘ siene p,’ L , b w knowledge . O , bj p , bj a b xb bj— pb w w pm m w ’ bj— p w w

.53

B w w bw w - w I ? C,L , m bj, b m-, , - mb mp. I w, m m w . T , w Spaltung bw . M mp, b M M pmp ’‘,’54 L p mp m: ‘ ,’ , -b w x . L p-

—.. — m‘ ’ b w ‘[] w ’:55 , . A b , m , b ‘x’ w m ‘bm’ ,56 -p m t’ x, w m p Lp m w m m, m, (.. x bj); w m pb.

53. S ‘S ,’ 733. H , p w - w: L , ‘F’ ‘L’ pp m M-S b p w ‘ b .’P p two C ogito . H ‘’ ‘b p’ , p m knowledge , D,’ w b w (‘S ’, 737).Ob, p w m-M-S‘G.’54. M’ m mp b m 1968 ‘A S,’ w Te Symptom 10 , Sp 2009.55. ‘S ,’ 738.56. I L m w ‘nature p w […] -, m m p, , p m’ (J. L, Te Four Fundamental Conepts o Psycoanaly- sis [L: V, 1998] 28, m mp).




I p x L : w w, m p m b -— ’ p bj —w . I, , ( ) b b m -, , w pm b p pp w. T m m , b p p m ’ w mp, . S ormal , , w

w pp . T, bj bj b m x m m mb, w m b b (w M p m pp ‘--’);57 L mp , , m ’ w mmb w w m m 58 O , ma- terial , p p p m w. P- m mw w b b m p: L w ‘S ,’ ‘[] m pp p m mp [inidene ] .’59 O, -p m mp pp ,‘ mt .’60

A , w w w m , b m mm , - w b b m b pm mp pbb w w p-. W ’ mpm j mp, p pp ‘-’ w b m w. B, p , Mx m p Aer Finitude b w - Ppp’ m,61 b cane , -; ‘p b extending the probabilisti reasoning […] internal ( w ) the universe as suc,’62

. I , ppp w -b, , p pp b, w b b m-

57. S ‘S ,’ 739-4058. I, m w not w w G w,w, p w, m w f deeptive p.59.‘S ,’ 743.60. ‘Rép � é pp,’ Rép � é pp,’ ’ Autres érits (P: S, 2001) 209.61. Aer Finitude , 85.62. Aer Finitude , 97.




p, w p . I w, ‘I ?,’63 .

L p bw (.. mp ) b p w-w Sm XI , m, m p - m. Dw mp A’ Physis , m w , automaton tyce . T b w b m w pp pm ‘p ’ bj, mm p w [arte orée ].64 T b w , bt p mb , p . Hw, , p p -, b , automaton pbb w w m pb, , , m m, m b tyce , b b m . I b w j m Mx’ M’ b b m () pbb— R Bw, m, ‘ , pb b ontingeny , probability ’—65b m xp m very ondition o possibility o possibility as suc, w L , ‘S ,’ ‘ w ’ , Sm XI, ‘’ m w ‘p-

m m .’66

T xm m mp Sm XVI w L bw w . I w p, m w I m , m: w p w m; ’ p w - ; w () p m bm ï m; bw m , -b, mm . F ,m , w , w ‘ m ’ m, L, ‘m’ ‘ .’67 T —p —’ ’ ,

‘ w w w ’: ‘m.’68 T

63. Aer Finitude , 90.64. Te Four Fundamental Conepts o Psycoanalysis , 79.65. R B, Nihil Unbound: Enlightenment and Extintion (B: P, 2007)81.66.Te Four Fundamental Conepts o Psycoanalysis , 74 (m ).67. Le séminaire. Livre XVI , 30.68. Le séminaire. Livre XVI , 31.




p , w m b x ï m m w‘ w , p w w .’69 W b , b w b . F ,‘ b [] ’ p. T p - xb m x p, w mbm w m ‘ p m p, pp.’70

A m w b p— pf pp m b w b - —I w w Lm x b . W , ‘ w w onsequenes ,’ b , m m m ‘ m […] real ’ -mp w.71 I w, ‘ - w , ’—.. automaton pbb — x w ‘’ ‘m’ p b (in primis ), ,w t ‘ ,’ w ontinues p-

in toto .72 W w w xp pp w‘S ’ ’ m m p’ mp m . T , bw , - b natural ; , —- and — -. I -, L p, ‘métalangue ,’ ..mm , , b tmp mp w pp b ‘métalanguage ’ , p ‘ ,’ ‘ .’73

B, p L’ m m , w b ( pp ) b-

bw — pp -b automaton— not m b b x b qua . T - p m b ; L

69. Le séminaire. Livre XVI , 33.70. Le séminaire. Livre XVI, 32-3.71. Le séminaire. Livre XVI , 30-1 (m mp).72. Le séminaire. Livre XVI , 34.73. Le séminaire. Livre XVI . 34.




m, ‘ m mpbb U [] O,’ we w mp w .74 N-bmight b b m outside ; m pb— M-x —m pm m , hi et nun , p m w . p , b - qua b b p m , pb , , (m) - .Hw, mp b — b- w bw mp

mp automaton—m , w j , .Pp, p L’ m, w language b b b , natural ; , , m , - w m m ( m), w (,, ) . m p, L m b p p ‘ ’ w - ,75 w ‘ ,’ b ’. Bt , p ( thesis )—.. logial tout-ourt — pb p ( ) G’‘-’ p w; b , , m b p D C, p-b mp mp, w I .

74. J. L, Le séminaire. Livre XXIII. Le sinthome (P: S, 2005) 64. A pm m Sm p: ‘I w p b . Fm w pbm w p [w p] pp ’ (Le sinthome , 12). I U wO, m w b m ;I L p w, Sm XVI, ww, b , mm ‘ - [omprenoire divine ]’ (Le séminaire. Livre XVI, 36).75. Aer Finitude , 90.

Lorenzo Chiesa - Hyperstructuralism's necessity of contingency

Documents

Transcript of Lorenzo Chiesa - Hyperstructuralism's necessity of contingency