Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery

11
Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery Lijuan Zhao Advisors: Prof. Fatima Merchant Prof. Shishir Shah

description

Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery. Lijuan Zhao Advisors: Prof. Fatima Merchant Prof. Shishir Shah. Motivation. Breast Reconstruction Breast cancer treatments usually lead to complete or partial breast removal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery

Page 1: Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery

Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during

Reconstructive Surgery

Lijuan Zhao

Advisors: Prof. Fatima Merchant Prof. Shishir Shah

Page 2: Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery

MotivationBreast Reconstruction

- Breast cancer treatments usually lead to complete or partial breast removal

- Breast reconstruction surgery is used to rebuild lost or deformed tissue

- Surgery is completed in a multi-step process lasting for 2-3 years

- Currently there is no process to monitor or quantify changes occurring in breast morphology through the reconstruction process

- This information is needed to better assess surgical outcome

Page 3: Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery

Current Quantitative Parameters for Assessment of Breast Reconstruction

Measurements of breast aesthetics- Volume, symmetry, proportion,

projection, ptosis, etc.Current parameters provide a

global assessment at a given time point

No measure are available to correlate local morphological changes over time

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

(e)

(a) Volume(b) Symmetry(c)

Proportion(d) Projection(e) Ptosis

Page 4: Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery

Computational Challenge

Visit 1 Visit 2 Visit 3

Retrieve breast data from 3D torso imagesAnalyze breast changes for different visits for same patient

Page 5: Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery

3D Breast ImagingExample of 3D torso image

Point cloud Triangular mesh surface

2D texture imagemapped onto surface

Page 6: Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery

Flow-chart of processing steps

Visit 1Image

Visit 2Image

Visit 3Image •••

Corresponding mathematicalmodel

Automatic breast data extraction

Quantitative correlation of changes

Page 7: Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery

Spatio-Temporal Correspondence Chest walls are not matched for different visits

- Coordinate systems may not be same- Patient weight changes may occur - 3D correspondence is required

Page 8: Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery

Mathematical Model for Spatio-temporal Correspondence

Construct corresponding model- Choose some fiducial points- Connect them to form a geometry- Choose same points on different images- Construct the correspondence between

torsos• Experimental measurements:

- Which fiducial points are suitable- Linear or non-linear relationships for

distances between fiducial points in different images

Page 9: Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery

Quantitative correlation of changes The transformations of breast data are

deformableUsing 3D group-wise point sets based non-

rigid registration to analyze breast changes‐ Propose new method with good cost function and

optimization scheme Develop appropriate model to represent local topology of

point sets Develop Similarity Metric for registration of temporal data

sets Develop methods to quantify changes in breast morphology

over time

Page 10: Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery

Thank You!

Questions?

Page 11: Longitudinal Characterization of Breast Morphology during Reconstructive Surgery

Possible ApproachesRobust point set registration using Gaussian mixture

models‐ Using Gaussian mixture models to represent point sets‐ Divergence measure: L2 distance‐ Deformation model: thin-plate splines (TPS)+ Gaussian radial basis

functions (GRBF)‐ PROS: efficient and robust‐ CONS: but only works for pair-wise point set

Group-wise point-set registration using a novel CDF-based Havrda-Charvat divergence‐ Using Dirac mixture models to represent point sets‐ Divergence measure: CDF-HC divergence‐ Deformation model: thin-plate splines (TPS)‐ PROS: efficient and simple to implement‐ CONS: not robust for noise and outliers