London Stock Exchange - Babson Collegefaculty.babson.edu/goldstein/Teaching...London Stock Exchange...
Transcript of London Stock Exchange - Babson Collegefaculty.babson.edu/goldstein/Teaching...London Stock Exchange...
London Stock Exchange
FIN 3560-01: Financial Markets and Instruments
Ryan Kahn
Kelly E. Sullivan
Nico von Stackelberg
December 5th
, 2011
Professor Michael Goldstein
I pledge my honor that I have neither received nor provided any unauthorized assistance during the
completion of this work.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 1 -
Executive Summary
The London Stock Exchange is one of the largest and most iconic exchanges in the world. While
most people have heard of the LSE, few understand its business model, sources of revenue, the overall
industry structure, as well as the regulatory and competitive landscapes facing the LSE. In this paper, we
explain these elements. In addition, given that the LSE has been involved in several M&A transactions
(some failed, some successful) over the past several years in an effort to remain competitive and to
consolidate, we use these deals to test the Synergy Trap Hypothesis. This hypothesis posits that the stock
price of an acquirer (target) tends to fall (rise) just before and after an announced M&A transaction.
Acquirers are typically believed to overpay in deals and therefore the markets punish their actions.
Movements before the announcement of a transaction occur due to leaked information or simply
anticipation of a transaction. After performing a statistical analysis on 11 diverse deals over several years
involving the London Stock Exchange, we concluded that 5 of these deals supported the Synergy Trap
Hypothesis, while 2 of them did not. The remainder had statistically insignificant results. We looked into
several elements such as the dates of the deals, the industry of the acquirers/targets, and the currencies
used in the deals, and we were unable to come to any definitive conclusions regarding which deals tended
to support or reject our hypothesis. Given that just five out of eleven deals supported our hypothesis, we
cannot conclusively support the Synergy Trap Hypothesis in its application to the LSE’s M&A deals.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 2 -
London Stock Exchange Overview
The London Stock Exchange Group Plc (LSE) is Europe’s leading diversified stock exchange
group, created through the incorporation of Borsa Italiana, London Stock Exchange, and MillenniumIT.
Through these subsidiaries, the LSE operates diversified exchange platforms for international equities,
fixed income, and derivatives markets in Europe. The LSE provides its clients with a diversified offering
through its ability to develop and provide innovative products and services across a range of asset classes
that respond to both the evolving needs of investors and the changing dynamics shaping the industry. The
LSE is actively engaged in the admission and listing of securities for trading, the distribution of exchange
platforms and trading systems, post-trade clearing and settlement services, the distribution and provision
of real-time market data, technology and information services, and the coordination and regulation of
securities markets.1
The LSE operates four distinct business segments, which contribute to the Group’s ability to offer
diversified exchange trading services. Its Capital Markets division assists companies with raising capital
(both debt and equity) for investment purposes as well as providing investors with access to deep and
highly liquid secondary markets which facilitates greater ease of trading and also serves to reduce the cost
of capital for these firms.2 This business segment has also had success in the primary markets,
experiencing a recent increase in the number of new companies listed on the Group’s exchanges through
initial public offerings. Through its subsidiaries, the LSE lists in excess of 3,000 companies on its equity
markets and provides clients with the ability to trade equities, fixed income, and derivative products on
exchanges across Europe. The LSE’s Post Trade Services segment offers a broad range of risk
management services in addition to securities clearing, settlement, and custody services facilitating the
successful completion of trades. This segment has readily adapted to the recent policy reform impacting
1 ThomsonOne. London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Company Overview, pg. 1. Retrieved from
https://www.thomsonone.com/Workspace/Main.aspx?View=Action%3dOpen&BrandName=&IsSsoLogin=True. 2 London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Annual Report 2011, pg. 16. Retrieved from
http://www.londonstockexchangegroup.com/investor-relations/financial-performance/financial-key-documents/lseg-
annual-report-2011.pdf.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 3 -
the post trade landscape by making adjustment to how the Group manages its clearing services (through
CC&G and Monte Titoli) across multiple exchange platforms. Additionally, this division has diversified
its post-trade services to more efficiently manage counterparty risk, trade matching, and confirmation.
The Information Services division delivers to clients an expansive set of real-time, reliable market data,
including data on trading volumes, share prices, index information, current and historical data, and
company announcements. The objective of this segment is to provide investors with “extensive market
intelligence”3 for the purpose of strategic decision making. The LSE has significantly expanded its
information management systems (primarily through acquisitions) including Proquote, UnaVista,
SEDOL, and Turquoise to better serve the trading information and market data needs of its clients across
a range of asset classes. The LSE’s Technology Services segment delivers, implements, and supports
technology platforms and trading software for clients of its subsidiaries – Borsa Italiana, London Stock
Exchange, and MillenniumIT. This division works to optimize the speed, performance, connectivity, and
trading flexibility4 of its exchange platforms as well as to deepen the scope of its technology offering by
successfully adapting to technological innovations in order to maintain the LSE’s leading edge in the
speed and efficiency of its technology capabilities. The vast breadth and scope of the LSE’s service
offering, evidenced by the end-to-end provision of trading services through its four business units, clearly
demonstrates the Group’s significant diversification within the exchange trading industry. This
diversification is in large part the value proposition that the LSE offers its clients, investors, and capital
market participants.
The LSE’s strategy for growth is structured around three strategic imperatives: “getting in shape,”
“leveraging assets,” and “developing opportunities.”5 “Getting in shape” refers to the LSE’s vision to
increase the efficiency of the products and services provided to its clients. The Group is currently
pursuing initiatives to improve the operational management of its technology services aimed at reducing
costs; affording the LSE an advantageous position relative to competing exchange firms which face
3 London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Annual Report 2011, pg. 22.
4 London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Annual Report 2011, pg. 24.
5 London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Annual Report 2011, pg. 14.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 4 -
intense price competition. Furthermore, the LSE is working to develop incentives to increase volumes and
boost overall competitiveness through new tariff structures in an effort to create a need among investors
for its increasingly streamlined and efficient service offering. The strategic focus on “leveraging assets
and developing opportunities” refers to the LSE’s strategy to improve its ability to serve customers across
the globe by increasing the scale and scope of its operations. The LSE has positioned itself to achieve this
objective primarily through strategic mergers and acquisitions that closely align with the Group’s
overarching business strategy. The LSE has pursued a series of recent acquisitions and strategic
partnerships that have enabled the firm to remain competitive within the industry and to keep pace with
the evolving demands of its clients and investors. These acquisitions have served to expand the
geographic presence of the Group’s exchange operations – penetrating previously untapped markets in
Mongolia, Japan, India, Scandinavia, and Sri Lanka. In addition, these strategic partnerships have
enhanced and further diversified the scope of its service offerings in trading and exchange and promoted
the globalization of capital markets and development of market relationships by providing networking
technologies and exchange trading platforms. These various strategic initiatives – and in particular the
alliances, business partnerships, and merger and acquisition activities – pursued by the LSE are in large
part driven by the Group’s ambition to be “a world leading diversified exchange group.”6 Taken together,
this three-pronged growth strategy has been developed to afford the LSE the financial and operational
flexibility to respond to the dynamic forces shaping the financial markets and position the Group to
remain a competitive and dominant participant in the exchange trading industry.
How the LSE Generates Revenue
The London Stock Exchange generates revenue from the four major activities noted above. In the
capital markets segment, the LSE charges companies for listing on its exchange based on the market
6 Data Monitor. London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Company Profile. October 18, 2011, pg. 4. Retrieved from
www.datamonitor.com.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 5 -
capitalization of the company7 and annual fees thereafter. Admission fees would be roughly £57,000 for
a firm with a market capitalization of £250M, whereas the annual fees are £5,350.8 Fees are also charged
for secondary issues and public announcements. It also assesses membership fees on firms that belong to
the exchange (£10,000 to join and £12,500 annually).9 The LSE even earns money on each trade that is
executed, and the pricing follows a tiered structure, such that the cost ranges between 0.20bps and
0.45bps based on the value of equity and derivative orders executed.10
The capital market segment
generated 42% of the exchange’s revenue.11
Post trade services relates to clearing and settlement of trades as well as custody of assets. Once a
trade occurs, a clearing house essentially guarantees the trade and nets all of the buy and sell orders of
firms. The settlement process involves assets being transferred between parties and the custodian can hold
and service the assets on behalf of these parties. In FY2011, the LSE cleared roughly 116 million
contracts, processed 70 million settlement instructions, and was the custodian for over €3 trillion of
assets. It also generated revenues through treasury services afforded to firms whose trades were cleared.
Post trade services accounted for £150.6M or 23% of the firm’s revenue.12
Information services relates to real-time data feeds of pricing and trading data. The 2011-2012
price list shows that data licensing (to disseminate the data outside the organization) can range from a few
thousand pounds per year to over £45,000, depending on the type of customer and the medium through
which the data is transferred.13
Other data feeds are only a few hundred pounds per month. 93,000
subscribers access LSE data and 139,000 access Borsa Italiana data through these services. The LSE
7 Thus, this source of revenue fluctuates with market conditions
8 LSE AIM Fees Calculator. Retrieved from http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/companies-and-
advisors/main-market/listing-fees/aim-fees-calculator.html. 9 London Stock Exchange. Membership. April 1, 2011. Retrieved from
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/traders-and-brokers/membership/faqs/pricing.pdf. 10
London Stock Exchange. Trading Services (On Exchange and OTC). October 1, 2011.Retrieved from
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/products-and-services/trading-services/pricespolicies/trading-services-price-
list-1-october-2011.pdf. 11
London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Annual Report 2011, pg. 4. 12
London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Annual Report 2011, pg. 4. 13
London Stock Exchange. Real Time Data Price List 2011/12. December 1, 2011. Retrieved from
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/products-and-services/market-data/realtimedata/pricesandpolicies/price-
list.pdf.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 6 -
collects other fees for providing access to other exchange data services and systems as well. One example
is Proquote which is a desktop tool that can display “quotes, news, and security profiles.”14
This area
accounted for £184.7M or 27% of the LSE’s revenue in the most recent fiscal year.15
Lastly, the technology services segment is comprised mostly of revenue from MillenniumIT
which is an Indian company specializing in capital markets’ systems and was acquired by the LSE in
2009.16
The LSE’s main objective in purchasing this firm was to transition clients from its current trading
platform known as TradElect to Millennium’s new system which can handle multiple asset classes and
has extremely low latency which is a major differentiator amongst exchanges. Millennium Exchange’s
latency is under 1 millisecond versus 1.41 for TradElect.17
Other services reported under this segment
include co-location services which allow firms to take hosting space in the LSE’s data center to ensure
rapid execution. Order routing services also contribute to sales. This group contributed just 7% of the
company’s sales or £48.6M.18
It is obvious that the market conditions greatly affect the LSE’s sales and profitability. Much of
the firm’s costs are fixed and therefore a decline in sales hurts the bottom line. The capital markets
segment is heavily dependent on market conditions given the fact that the LSE generates money based on
trading volumes and market values of new issues. Moreover, all post trade services are predicated on
market conditions as they are all tied to trading volumes. In terms of information services and technology
services, these areas seem to be in high demand, yet pricing pressures from competition can hurt the
exchange’s income as well.
Regulatory Environment
As one would expect, the London Stock Exchange is a heavily regulated entity as it is at the
backbone of capital markets and the entire financial system requires trust and security. The Financial
14
London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Annual Report 2011, pg. 23. 15
London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Annual Report 2011, pg. 4. 16
MilleniumIT.com. About Us. Retrieved from http://www.milleniumit.com/about/index.php. 17
London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Annual Report 2011, pg. 24. 18
London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Annual Report 2011, pg. 4.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 7 -
Security Authority (FSA) is the primary regulator of the London Stock Exchange. It oversees trading
firms and investing institutions, securities trading, clearing and settlement, and trading venues such as the
LSE.19
On June 7th, 2010, George Osborn, the Chancellor of the Exchequer finalized plans to abolish the
FSA and release the responsibility of policing the city and the new banking system to the Financial
Conduct Authority (FCA).20
This transition will be overseen by Hector Sants, the current Chief Executive
of the FSA, and will be completed by the end of 2012 to ensure market confidence, financial stability,
protection of consumers, and that the reduction in financial crime is monitored under one statutory body.
The introduction of an amended law known as the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive
(MiFID),21
implemented in 2007, obligated companies to report using an Approved Reporting Mechanism
(ARM) to detect and investigate cases of market abuse, insider trading, market manipulation, and also as
a part of monitoring of supervised firm activity.22
Subsequently, the FSA developed its own ARM called
the Transition Reporting System (TRS). Since the LSE operated its own Approved Reporting Mechanism,
the UnaVista platform, the FSA entered into an agreement to sell the TRS to the London Stock Exchange
to fulfill ongoing reporting obligations and to migrate current TRS customers to the UnaVista Platform.
This was yet another one of the LSE’s recent acquisitions.
The Financial Markets Security Act (FMSA) of 2010 outlines the objectives to maintain market
confidence, securing the appropriate degree of protection for consumers, fighting financial crime, and
contributing to the protection and enhancement of the stability of the UK Financial System.23
The FSA
and the FCA (the foreseeable successor to the FSA) have established that the LSE will continue to meet
these regulatory standards in the event of a take-over.24
19
Financial Services Authority (FSA). London Stock Exchange Mergers Enquiry. Retrieved from
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/other/fsa_submission.pdf. 20
Vina, Gonzalo. U.K. Scraps FSA in Biggest Bank Overhaul Since 1997. Bloomberg, June 17, 2010. Retrieved
from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-06-16/u-k-scraps-fsa-in-biggest-bank-regulation-overhaul-since-
1997.html. 21
We will discuss other implications of MiFID later, as it relates to MTFs 22
Financial Services Authority (FSA). FSA enters into an agreement to sell TRS to the London Stock Exchange.
August 2, 2011. Retrieved from http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2011/068.shtml. 23
Financial Services Authority (FSA). FSA enters into an agreement to sell TRS to the London Stock Exchange. 24
Financial Services Authority (FSA). London Stock Exchange Mergers Enquiry.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 8 -
Security & Commodity Exchange Industry Overview
The exchange industry is aggressive and highly competitive. While the LSE competes directly
with three major exchange firms – NYSE Euronext Inc., NASDAQ OMX Group Inc., and Deutsche
Boerse AG – the Group also faces intense global competition from existing and new exchange firms.
Given the recent trends toward globalization and the liberalization of international capital markets, this
has resulted in a significant increase in capital mobility among international market participants thereby
intensifying the competitive pressures among exchange firms in their competition to attract securities
listings and trading services across a broad range of asset classes. Exchange firms also compete with
market participants on “the cost, quality and speed of trade execution, market liquidity, the functionality,
ease of use and performance of trading systems, the range of products and services offered to customers
and listed companies, technological innovation and reputation.”25
To be successful in the exchange trading industry, firms seek to increase the scale and scope of
their operations though a diversified product offering, lower prices and transaction fees, and global
expansion. Given this set of objectives, growth and financial success for exchange firms like the LSE is
heavily dependent upon mergers and acquisitions, strategic partnerships, business alliances, and joint
ventures. However, such a strategy of global growth and diversification is not without risks. Firms in the
exchange industry are subject to a series of risk factors beyond their control that pose a significant threat
to financial performance and operating results. There is significant risk, exposure, and uncertainty
associated with a financial strategy of expansion through strategic mergers, as exchange firms look to
penetrate previously untapped markets and offer new and untested financial instruments. In addition,
adverse economic conditions have the potential to negatively impact firms’ profits by reducing the
demand for their services – restricting trading volumes, reducing the number of securities listings, and
causing a decline in transaction fees. Furthermore, given the dynamic forces at play in the financial
markets, exchange firms are constantly at risk for being negatively impacted by regulatory reform, new
25
NYSE Euronext 10K Annual Report 2010, pg. 22. Retrieved from http://phx.corporate-
ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9ODU5NzN8Q2hpbGRJRD0tMXxUeXBlPTM=&t=1.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 9 -
financial policies, and technological innovations that fundamentally change the nature of competition and
require significant capital expenditure to adapt to in order to remain competitive.
Competition
As mentioned earlier, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) was implemented
in 2007 with one of the main goals of increasing competition in financial products trading. As part of this,
multilateral trading facilities or MTFs came into existence as an alternative to the “incumbent”
exchanges. This meant that the trading of UK securities, for example, no longer had to be transacted over
the London Stock Exchange, as new exchanges existed to handle these orders. The MTFs are the most
formidable competitors to the LSE. Looking at the FTSE 100 index (UK-focused), the LSE still has the
largest market share of trading of 51.79%.26
However, MTFs have a very significant share of the market:
Chi-X has a 31.44% share, Turquoise (acquired by the LSE in 201027
) has an 8.74% share, and BATS has
a 7.83% share. Other exchanges, such as the NYSE, facilitate a negligible amount of trades.
Despite the fact that MiFID is still a relatively new law, the competitive effects are evident. The
introduction of MTFs automatically put pressure on incumbents such as the LSE to innovate and provide
better and more enhanced technology and services to their clients.28
Moreover, the trading venues all
compete primarily on price, but liquidity and order depth also factor into the equation. For example, a
study published in 2010 from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology indicates that roughly “96% of order
flow is routed to the LSE when they are at the best price alone.”29
That said, when some of the MTFs post
lower prices than Chi-X (the MTF leader) or the LSE, the orders do not necessarily get placed on these
cheaper alternatives. Liquidity – measured by the effective spread – is another major determining factor
26
Fidessa Fragmentation Index. Week ending 10/28/11. Retrieved from
http://fragmentation.fidessa.com/indexstats/euindexstats/?index=.UKX&indexdesc=FTSE%20100®ion=EU. 27
Competition Commission. Summary of hearing with London Stock Exchange and Turquoise Global Holdings
Limited, pg. 1. Retrieved from http://www.competition-
commission.org.uk/inquiries/ref2011/bats_chi_trading/pdf/summary_of_hearing_with_lse.pdf. 28
Riordan, Ryan, Andreas Storkenmaier, and Martin Wagener. "Fragmentation, Competition and Market Quality: A
Post-MiFID Analysis." Campus for Finance. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 11 Aug. 2010. Web. 6 November
2011. http://campus-for-finance.com/filebrowser/files/Papers/49a40613086_name.pdf. pg 5 29
Riordan, Storkenmaier, & Wagener, pg 14.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 10 -
for customers choosing to trade on various platforms. Interestingly, the LSE has higher effective spreads
than its competitors, yet it executes many more trades. This is certainly due to its better pricing, and the
researchers also attribute this to the fact that traders demand even “better terms of trade” on MTFs in
order to trade there.30
This essentially lowers any switching costs associated with changing trading
venues.
Statistical Analysis
As exchange firms seek to remain competitive – providing customers with the most cutting edge
trading technologies, competitive pricing, diversified product offering, and access to highly liquid global
capital markets – this has led to a significant increase in mergers & acquisition (M&A) activity among
leading exchange trading firms, including the LSE. Businesses mentioned above, such as MillenniumIT
and Proquote, are now part of the LSE as they were acquired by the exchange in recent years. Given the
overarching trend towards M&A activity within the exchange industry, the following line of statistical
analysis seeks to test whether the announcement of the LSE’s recent M&A transactions impact the firm’s
stock price in a such a way that is in line with the currently accepted models. Currently accepted models
state that acquirers tend to pay a premium to improve the core of the business. Especially in hostile bids,
excessive premiums are paid and the markets typically view this as a desperate act, thereby negatively
affecting share price of the acquirer.31
The premium paid can best be explained by the acquiring firm’s
expectation of synergistic benefits.32
The benefits can oftentimes be overstated. According to the
Synergy Trap Hypothesis, just prior to and after the announcement of an M&A deal, the target (acquiring)
firm’s stock price rises (falls).33
Stock price movements prior to the announcement are a result of leaked
information and/or anticipation about the transaction. Stock price changes after the announcement are a
result of investors punishing the acquiring firms which tend to overpay and rewarding the target firms
which often receive “too much.”
30
Riordan, Storkenmaier, & Wagener, pg. 13. 31
Travlos, pg. 962. 32
Wansley, Lane, & Yang, pg 16. 33
Shaheen, pg. 27.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 11 -
We tested the Synergy Trap Hypothesis to determine if it holds true for the M&A transactions in
which the LSE was involved (see Exhibit #2 & #3 for summary and regression results). In order to do
this, we first ran a regression of the London Stock Exchange’s stock price five days before and five days
after the announcement of a transaction. We then analyzed the results, paying attention to the p-values
which indicate whether or not our results are statistically significant. Regressions with p-values of less
than 0.05 are all considered significant. The x-values in our analysis represent days 0 through 10, and the
y-values represent the stock price in British pounds. Of the eleven deals we analyzed,34
four of the
regressions were not statistically significant and therefore do not have any bearing on our overall
hypothesis test. Five deals did indeed support the hypothesis we were testing. In four of these deals, the
LSE was the acquirer and in one of them, the LSE was the target in the transaction.
On December 9, 2002, the LSE announced its purchase of the Equity Derivative Operations from
OMX to expand its position in the equity options markets. The linear regression equation for the stock
price surrounding this deal is y = -3.7811x + 327.7964, and its p-value is 0.0003, indicating that the
regression is statistically significant. The negative x-variable is in line with the hypothesis that the stock
price of the acquirer (the LSE) falls before and after the announced transaction.
On March 10, 2006, NASDAQ OMX Group made a bid for the LSE (one of several made over
the years) in an effort to expand its exchange operations across the globe. In looking at the regression
output related to this deal (OMX #3), the linear regression equation is y = 43.8609x + 780.7252 and the p-
value indicates statistical significance. The coefficient of the x-variable is positive, which is in line with
the hypothesis that the target’s (LSE’s) stock price would rise both just before and after the announcement
of the deal. This deal was terminated, yet that occurred outside of the dates in our analysis.
On June 23, 2007, the LSE announced its acquisition of Borsa Italiana in order to recognize
synergies with the Italian exchange. The regression equation for this deal is y = -5.5133x + 1380.812 and
the p-value is under 0.05. The negative x-variable corroborates the hypothesis that the LSE’s stock price
should fall in the event it acquires another firm like Borsa Italiana.
34
All deals analyzed had been announced and either completed or terminated.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 12 -
On December 21, 2009, the LSE acquired Turquoise Trading in order to keep pace with the
shifting market in which MTFs were gaining significant share as a result of the MiFID regulations
discussed earlier. The linear regression equation in this deal was y = -4.7971x + 747.8652 and the p-
value of less than 0.05 indicates that the results are statistically significant. The negative x-variable
coefficient is in line with the hypothesis that the acquirer’s stock would fall just before and after a
transaction.
More recently, on August 2, 2011, the LSE announced that it would purchase the FSA’s
Transaction Reporting Service which was discussed in the regulatory section. The linear regression for
the five days before and after the deal is y = -19.1927x + 1055.872 and the p-value is well below 0.05.
The negative x-variable coefficient indicates that as the days progressed, the LSE’s stock price fell, which
was to be expected given that it was the acquirer in the deal.
There were two deals whose regressions were statistically significant and they did not support our
hypothesis. The first was the LSE’s acquisition of MillenniumIT in 2009 (described earlier as the Sri
Lankan firm that forms backbone of the LSE’s technology services division). The regression equation for
the days surrounding this deal is y = 9.9299x + 789.9483, indicating that the LSE’s stock rose despite it
being the acquirer. We saw a similar situation earlier this year with the LSE’s failed acquisition of the
TMX Group, the Canadian exchange that the LSE had hoped to merge with and recognize many
synergies. The regression equation in this instance is y = 5.2345x + 874.115, also indicating a positive
correlation between time and stock price. We tried to isolate why these two deals may have contradicted
the hypothesis, and can only surmise that they were so transformative that investors believed that it would
be quite accretive to the LSE. The MillenniumIT deal gave the exchange a super-fast, new trading
platform which is a major competitive advantage. The TMX deal would have likely been synergistic as
two major exchanges could have combined to form a global powerhouse. Once again, this is just
conjecture; we investigated other elements of the deals including their dates and the type of currency used
in the transactions (i.e. cash or stock), yet all analyses in this regard were inconclusive.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 13 -
The second regression set we ran sought to test the Synergy Trap Hypothesis over a broader time
period of one month prior to the announcement of a merger (Exhibit #3). This line of analysis was
performed in an attempt to capture the impact that potentially leaked information or investor speculation
regarding an upcoming acquisition announcement had on the LSE as either the target or acquiring firm.
Applying the principles of the Synergy Trap Hypothesis to this theory would imply that if information
were leaked to the market in advance of the formal announcement date the target firm would expect to see
its stock price increase and the acquiring firm would experience the opposite stock price reaction. In order
to test this, we ran a regression of the LSE’s stock price one month before and five days after the
announcement of a merger transaction. We then analyzed the results, noting that regressions with p-values
less than 0.05 were statistically significant. The x-values in this analysis represent days 0 through 30, and
the y-values represent the stock price in British pounds. Regressions that support the Synergy Trap
Hypothesis will have x-variables with a negative sign if LSE were the acquirer and positive x-variables if
LSE is the target of the acquisition.
The results of this regression set, testing stock price movement over a longer time period, yielded
the same results as the previous analysis which looked at only five days prior to a deal’s announcement.
Of the eleven deals analyzed, four of the regressions were not statistically significant – OMX #4,
Macquarie, Proquote, and EDX London – and were therefore excluded from our final analysis regarding
the applicability of the hypothesis being tested. Five deals were statistically significant and supported the
Synergy Trap Hypothesis. For those transactions in which LSE was in the position of the acquiring firm
(Equity Derivatives, Borsa Italiana, Transaction Reporting Service, and Turquoise), the regression
equations for these deals had extremely low p-values and strongly negative slope variables, indicating that
in the run up to the announcement date the LSE saw its stock price decline. For the one deal that supports
the hypothesis and in which the LSE was the target firm (OMX #3), the results showed a p-value
significantly less than 0.05 and a positive slope variable, which confirms the theory that in the month
prior to the deal’s announcement the LSE’s stock price increased. Two of the transactions analyzed
(MillenniumIT and TMX) did not support the Synergy Trap Hypothesis. These deals, with the LSE in the
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 14 -
position of acquiring firm, had a positive impact on the LSE stock price which runs counter to the theory
being tested. As previously discussed, the reason for this divergence may be a consequence of the
potentially synergistic alliances that would have resulted from these two mergers which resulted in a
positive effect on the LSE’s stock price. Although approximately 45% of the LSE acquisition deals tested
in this analysis were statistically significant and supported the Synergy Trap Hypothesis, the results are
not conclusive enough to confirm the validity of this theory in its application to the London Stock
Exchange’s recent transactions.
Conclusion
The London Stock Exchange is a well-diversified exchange which has relied significantly on
growth through mergers and acquisitions over the past several years. Not only has the LSE purchased
other firms to complement its existing operations and offerings, it has only been the target of transactions,
although none have been completed successfully. Our tests of the Synergy Trap Hypothesis on the LSE’s
stock price over two distinct time periods showed that the hypothesis was unreliable, at best, for the LSE.
Our analysis determined that we were unable to definitely prove the hypothesis.
The competitive environment is such that the LSE will likely continue its push to supplement
organic growth with acquisitions. From our analysis, we would warn investors not to apply the Synergy
Trap Hypothesis to the London Stock Exchange’s shares as our historical analysis suggests that doing so
is not always a winning proposition.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 15 -
References
Akben-Selcuk E. & Altiok-Yimaz A. “The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on Acquirer Performance:
Evidence From Trukey.” Business and Economics Journal, Volume 2001: BEJ-22. Retrieved
from: http://astonjournals.com/manuscripts/Vol2011/BEJ-22_Vol2011.pdf
Bloomberg LP (2011). L.P. London Stock Exchange Equity Stock Price Graph, July 20, 2001 to
November 17, 2011. Retrieved November 17, 2011 from Bloomberg terminal.
Bloomberg LP (2011). London Stock Exchange Acquisition Detail. Retrieved November 9,
2011 from Bloomberg terminal.
Catterjee R. & Kuenzi, A. “Mergers and Acquisitions: The Influence of Methods of Payment on Bidder’s
Share Price.” Research Papers in Management Studies: University of Cambridge.
Retrieved from: http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/research/working_papers/2001/wp0106.pdf
Competition Commission. Summary of hearing with London Stock Exchange and Turquoise Global
Holdings Limited. Retrieved from http://www.competition-
commission.org.uk/inquiries/ref2011/bats_chi_trading/pdf/summary_of_hearing_with_lse.pdf.
Data Monitor. London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Company Profile. October 18, 2011. Retrieved from
www.datamonitor.com.
Dummett, Ben. “2nd UPDATE: TMX Group, London Stock Exchange Terminate Merger Agreement.”
Wall Street Journal, June 29, 2011. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-
20110629-711986.html.
Fidessa Fragmentation Index. Week ending 10/28/11. Retrieved from
http://fragmentation.fidessa.com/indexstats/euindexstats/?index=.UKX&indexdesc=FTSE%2010
0®ion=EU.
Financial Services Authority (FSA). London Stock Exchange Mergers Enquiry. Retrieved from
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/other/fsa_submission.pdf.
Financial Services Authority (FSA). FSA enters into an agreement to sell TRS to the London Stock
Exchange. August 2, 2011. Retrieved from
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2011/068.shtml.
London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Annual Report 2011. Retrieved from
http://www.londonstockexchangegroup.com/investor-relations/financial-performance/financial-
key-documents/lseg-annual-report-2011.pdf.
London Stock Exchange plc. Exchange website. Retrieved from
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/home/homepage.htm.
London Stock Exchange. Membership. April 1, 2011. Retrieved from
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/traders-and-brokers/membership/faqs/pricing.pdf.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 16 -
London Stock Exchange. Real Time Data Price List 2011/12. December 1, 2011. Retrieved from
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/products-and-services/market-
data/realtimedata/pricesandpolicies/price-list.pdf
London Stock Exchange. Trading Services (On Exchange and OTC). October 1, 2011.Retrieved
From: http://www.londonstockexchange.com/products-and-services/trading-
services/pricespolicies/trading-services-price-list-1-october-2011.pdf.
LSE AIM Fees Calculator. Retrieved from
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/companies-and-advisors/main-market/listing-
fees/aim-fees-calculator.html.
McCann, Michael. “Motives For Acquisition In The UK.” The Nottingham Trent University Division of
Economics. January 2004. Retrieved from
http://www.ntu.ac.uk/research/document_uploads/31286.pdf
MilleniumIT.com. About Us. Retrieved from http://www.milleniumit.com/about/index.php.
MillenniumIT. Latest News “London Stock Exchange Group to acquire MillenniumIT.” Retrieved from
http://www.milleniumit.com/news/index.php.
NYSE Euronext 10K Annual Report 2010, pg. 22. Retrieved from
http://phx.corporate-
ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9ODU5NzN8Q2hpbGRJRD0tMXxUeXBlPTM=&t=
1.
Shaheen, Isfandiyar. "Stock Market Reaction to Acquisition Announcements using an Event Study
Approach." 5 May 2006. Retrieved from
http://dspace.nitle.org/bitstream/handle/10090/4167/Shaheen.pdf?sequence=1..
Riordan, Ryan, Andreas Storkenmaier, and Martin Wagener. "Fragmentation, Competition and
Market Quality: A Post-MiFID Analysis." Campus for Finance. Karlsruhe Institute of
Technology, 11 Aug. 2010. Web. 6 Nov. 2011. Retrieved from http://campus-for-
finance.com/filebrowser/files/Papers/49a40613086_name.pdf.
ThomsonOne. London Stock Exchange Group Plc – Company Overview. Retrieved from
https://www.thomsonone.com/Workspace/Main.aspx?View=Action%3dOpen&BrandName=&Is
SsoLogin=True.
Thorton, Mark. “The Synergy Trap: How Companies Lose the Acquisition Game.” New York: The Free
Press, 1997. Retrieved from: http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae2_1_6.pdf
Travolos, Nickolaos. “Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment, and Bidding Firms’ Stock Returns.” The
Journal of Finance, Vol. 42, No. 4 (September 1987), pp. 943-963. Blackwell Publishing for the
American Finance Association. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2328300
Wansely, James W., Lane, William R., & Yang, Ho C. “Abnormal Returns To Acquired Firms By Type
of Acquisition and Method of Payment.” Financial Management, Vol. 12. No. 4 (Autumn, 1983),
pp 16-22. Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the Financial Management Association
International. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3665512
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 17 -
Vina, Gonzalo. U.K. Scraps FSA in Biggest Bank Overhaul Since 1997. Bloomberg, June 17, 2010.
Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-06-16/u-k-scraps-fsa-in-biggest-bank-
regulation-overhaul-since-1997.html.
Yahoo! Finance. London Stock Exchange Group plc (LSE.L) – Historical Prices. Retrieved from
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=LSE.L+Historical+Prices.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 18 -
Exhibits
Exhibit 1 – LSE Stock Price Graph, in Great Britain Pounds (GBp) (2001 – 2011)
Source: Bloomberg.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 19 -
Exhibit 2 – LSE Regression Set #2: 5 days prior to M&A announcement and 5 days after
Summary of Regression Results
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 20 -
2-A
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 21 -
2-B
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 22 -
2-C
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 23 -
2-D
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 24 -
2-E
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 25 -
2-F
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 26 -
2-G
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 27 -
2-H
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 28 -
2-I
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 29 -
2-J
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 30 -
2-K
Source: Yahoo! Finance.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 31 -
Exhibit 3 – LSE Regression Set #1: 1 month prior to M&A announcement and 5 days after
Summary of Regression Results
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 32 -
3-A
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 33 -
3-B
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 34 -
3-C
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 35 -
3-D
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 36 -
3-E
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 37 -
3-F
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 38 -
3-G
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 39 -
3-H
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 40 -
3-I
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 41 -
3-J
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 42 -
3-K
Source: Yahoo! Finance.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 43 -
Exhibit 4 – LSE Acquisitions Details
Borsa Italiana
EDX London
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 44 -
Equity Derivatives Ops
Macquarie
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 45 -
MillenniumIT
OMX #3
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 46 -
OMX #4
Proquote
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 47 -
TMX
Transaction Reporting Service
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 48 -
Turquoise
Source: Bloomberg.
London Stock Exchange Kahn, Sullivan, & von Stackelberg
- 49 -
“The authors of this paper hereby give permission to Professor Michael Goldstein to distribute this paper by hard
copy, to put it on reserve at Horn Library at Babson College, or to post a PDF version of this paper on the internet.”