Logic summary.docx
-
Upload
jela-oasin -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of Logic summary.docx
![Page 1: Logic summary.docx](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072003/563dba2e550346aa9aa36221/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Fallacies
- Certain kind of defect in an argument
An argument can be defective when:
1. It has one or more false premises2. It contains a fallacy
Kinds of fallacy
1. Formal fallacy- Identifies through mere inspection of the form
or structure of an argument- All A are B.
All C are B.Therefore, all A are C
2. Informal Fallacy- Detected only through analysis of the content
of the argument- Makes bad argument appear good- All A are B
All C are DAll A are D
- Backed with the motive of the arguer to deceive the reader/listener and sometime, the arguer deceives even himself
Aristotle
- Identifies 13 fallacies and separated them into 2 groups
FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE
- Premises are logically irrelevant to conclusion- Premises are psychologically relevant so
conclusion seem to follow logically, even though it does not.
- Connection between premises and conclusion is emotional thus it is important to distinguish genuine evidence from forms of emotional appeal
1. APPEAL TO FORCE (ARGUMENTUM AD BACULUM: APPEAL TO THE “STICK”)
- Arguer poses a conclusion to another person and tells the person either implicitly or explicitly that harm will come to him/her if he/she does not accept the conclusion
- Involves threat to physical/psychological being- Accomplishes purpose by psychologically
impeding reader/listener from acknowledging a missing premise that if acknowledged, would be seen as false/questionable
2. APPEAL TO PITY (ARGUMENTUM AD MISERICORDIAM)
- Arguer poses a conclusion and then attempts to provoke pity from reader/listener in the effort for him/her to accept the conclusion
3. APPEAL TO THE PEOPLE (ARGUMETUM AD POPULUM)
- Uses desires to be loved, esteemed, admired, valued etc. to get the reader/listener to accept conclusion
o Direct approach Arguer, addressing a large
group of people, excites emotions and enthusiasm of crowd to win acceptance of his conclusion.
Used by propagandist and demagogue
May be in writing/speakingo Indirect approach
Arguer appeals to one or more individuals separately
Techniques in advertising industry
Under Indirect approach:
Bandwagon argument You will be left out if
you don’t agree to what majority wants
Appeal to vanity Associates product to a
celebrity that is admired, the idea being you too, will be admired if you use it
Appeal to Snobbery