Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

15
Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments

Transcript of Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Page 1: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Logic & Critical ReasoningIdentifying arguments

Page 2: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

The Object of Analysis

In logic and critical reasoning one studies argumentation. From the perspective of critical reasoning an argument is specific kind of object of analysis.

An argument is not the same thing as a disagreement.

An argument has parts.

Page 3: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Definition of an Argument

An argument is a non-empty set of claims some of which are intended to support a single claim.

The claims that do the supporting are called the premises.

The claim that is supported is called the conclusion.

Page 4: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Argument Structure

Arguments have structure.

Atomic arguments have a single set of premises intended to establish a single conclusion.

Complex arguments use multiple atomic arguments to establish either a single conclusion or multiple conclusions.

Page 5: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

The Two Central Claims of an Argument

An argument makes two central claims:

The factual claim is that the premises are true.

The inferential claim is that the premises support the conclusion.

Page 6: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Two Types of Support

Deductive support occurs when the author of the argument intends it to be the case that the truth of the premises makes it the case that the conclusion could not be false.

True premises necessitate a true conclusion

Inductive support occurs when the author of the argument intends it to be the case that the truth of the premises makes the conclusion likely to be true.

True premises makes the conclusion probable.

Page 7: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Identifying arguments I

The first key task of critical thinking is to identify when an argument is present in speech and writing.

There are two main techniques for identifying arguments are:

Using indicators phrases as a way to find parts of an argument.

Learning to distinguish argument-like passages from actual argument passages.

Page 8: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Indicators

Premise indicators:Since

Given that

For

Because

For the reason that

In view of the fact that

Granted that

Seeing that

Conclusion indicators

Therefore

Thus

Hence

Consequently

It follows that

Which proves that

So

Page 9: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Distinguishing Arguments from Non-Arguments

Some passages look like they contain an argument, when they do not actually contain an argument.

Sometimes this is the case because a premise or conclusion indicator is present even though it is not signaling the presence of what it is generally intended to signal – a premise or a conclusion.

Page 10: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Reports

Reports are passages in which the primary function is to report what a person said. Since the primary goal of the passage is to report what someone said, reports are not arguments.

The primary goal of an argument is to establish the truth of a claim by providing reasons to believe the claim.

A report can be a premise or a conclusion, but alone a report is not an argument.

Page 11: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Report: Example

The New York Times reports that the CEO of British Petroleum has argued that because of the Deepwater Disaster, it can no longer supply funds to the locals that live on the Gulf Coast.

Although the premise indicator ‘because’ is present, since the passage in which it occurs is a report, the New York Times is not making an argument.

Page 12: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Explanation

An explanation is a passage in which a given phenomenon is taken to be true and one offers an account of why the phenomenon exists.

Explanations can be distinguished from arguments via the why-test.

If the authors primary aim is to say why something is true, then the passage is an explanation.

If the authors primary aim is to establish that something is true, then the passage is an argument.

Page 13: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Explanation: Example

Because the refraction of light depends on the medium through which it is traveling our experience of what an oar placed in water looks like, is different than what is actually present. We see an object, such as an oar or a pencil, submerged in water as slightly bent, when in fact it is not actually bent. We see it as bent because light traveling through the water to our retina is refracted off of the water.

Although ‘because’ is present, there is no argument. The author intends to say why something is the case.

Page 14: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Illustration

An illustration is a passage in which some phenomenon is illustrated through an example.

Illustration passages often contain the words ‘so’ and ‘thus’ as a way to mark the example to follow.

Often in an illustration an example is used to illustrate a general principle.

Page 15: Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Illustration: Example

Chlorides dissolve in Water, for example, salt is a chloride and it dissolves in water.

In an illustration often times a conclusion indicator is used to signal that something is an example of a general principle.

Key words to look for: For example, So,