Locally-led farmer-centered, results-based Schemes · - Greater trust, ownership, responsibility -...
Transcript of Locally-led farmer-centered, results-based Schemes · - Greater trust, ownership, responsibility -...
Locally-led (farmer-centered, results-based) Schemes - some learnings from Burren Life
The Burren
Farming and the Burren – a story that spans six millennia
Mid-1990’s: SAC Designations, Introduction of REPS Protecting the environment from negative farming activity
Restrictions on activity, important income, farmer concerns
Failure to effectively address growing environmental concerns…
Phase 1 (1998-2004) – Telling the Story
‘Farming and the Burren’ – the positive, but changing, role of farming
‘Farmers ‘a part of’ the Burren, not ‘apart from’ the Burren’
Phase 2 (2005-2010) EU LIFE Nature Project Developing, testing (& costing) solutions
Co-funded by Dept. of Agriculture, Food & the Marine & Dept. of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht (NPWS)
Phase 3 (2010- present) – Implementing (and adapting) solutions
The Burren Life Programme
A ‘Hybrid’ AES: Paying for Actions and Results
Paying for Results
Well managed species-rich grazed habitats in good condition
• Farmers told what’s wanted, how they achieve it is up to them
• Better the management & condition, the higher the payment
• Payment determined using a tailored scoring system
Grazing
Litter
Bare ground/Erosion
Feed site damage
Relating to Grazing & Stock Management
Water point damage
Weeds
Scrub encroachment Bracken
Relating to ‘Problem’ Species
Molinia
Winterage: Ecological Integrity
Burren Lowland grassland: Conservation Value
Calculating the Field Score
Weighted score for each criterion
More points = more money. €0 - €144 per hectare
Example: Damage to natural water source. Scrub encroachment. Undergrazed. Score 4/10 €0/ha
Low scores? – Action needed! Farmer-nominates & co-funds relevant tasks
Well managed with few or no problems:
Score 8/10 €96/ha; Score 9/10 €119/ha; Score 10/10 €144/ha
-8.00%
-6.00%
-4.00%
-2.00%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Ch
an
ge
Score
Change in 'Health' Scores 2010 to 2014 Higher the score, the better the condition
Constraints/Challenges:
- Apathy
- Mistrust
- Thinking inside the box
- Funding and its continuity
- Managing expectations
- Upholding standards
- Conflicting policies and supports
Learnings – what works (thus far) in Burren model
Locally-led
Farmer-centered
Results-based
- More relevant in every way - Greater trust, ownership, responsibility - Targeted advice, support & oversight
- Better ‘buy in’, value & outcomes - Enables diversity of approach - Forces greater clarity and simplicity
- Value for (taxpayer’s) money - Incentivises effort & ingenuity - Way more flexibility for farmer - In-built monitoring
Adaptive - Always seek, & allow space to, improve
Research & Planning - Critical, but must be targeted & practical
- Analysis-paralysis? Learning by doing
Trust. Patience. Compromise. Commitment.
Burren Winterage Weekend Oct 22nd -25th 2015: celebrating our farming heritage