Local Government Pension Scheme Guidance on the creation...
Transcript of Local Government Pension Scheme Guidance on the creation...
LGPS – Local Pension Board Guidance
Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS)
Guidance on the creation and operation of Local Pension Boards in England and Wales
Last updated: 28 January4 February 2015 (v1.1)
1
1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 2
2 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................... 5
3 LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND AND STRUCTURE OF GOVERNANCE
ARRANGEMENTS FROM 2015 ...................................................................... 7
4 THE PENSIONS REGULATOR ....................................................................... 14
5 CONSTITUTION AND MEMBERSHIP OF A LOCAL PENSION BOARD ..................18
6 BOARD KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING................................................ 32
7 CONDUCT OF MEMBERS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ................................ 39
8 REPORTING ............................................................................................. 48
9 RESOURCING AND FUNDING ...................................................................... 58
10 OTHER POSSIBLE STRUCTURES ................................................................. 61
11 OTHER GUIDANCE .................................................................................... 64
SCHEDULE A ............................................................................................ 65
SCHEDULE B ............................................................................................ 67
SCHEDULE C................................................................................... ........ 74
2
1. Introduction
1.1 The LGPS is a common pension scheme throughout England and Wales,
administered locally by 90 separate Administering Authorities.
1.2 In the context of the UK public service pension schemes, the LGPS is the
largest funded occupational pension scheme in the UK.
1.3 Administering Authorities are required to establish a new body to be known
as a Local Pension Board to assist the Administering Authority in its role as
the Scheme Manager of its Fund in accordance with the requirements of the
2013 Act.
1.4 This Guidance is designed to assist Administering Authorities in the creation
and operation of Local Pension Boards in line with relevant legislation and
in particular the 2013 Act and the Regulations.
1.5 This Guidance should not be taken as a definitive interpretation of
legislation and it should always be read in conjunction with the relevant
legislation. Administering Authorities are advised to secure their own legal
advice on the interpretation and application of the legal framework.
1.6 Unless otherwise stated, this Guidance is correct as at 28 January 2015.
1.7 The following is an explanation of defined terms used in this Guidance:
1972 Act The Local Government Act 1972.
1989 Act The Local Government & Housing Act 1989.
2000 Act The Local Government Act 2000.
2004 Act The Pensions Act 2004.
2011 Act The Localism Act 2011.
2013 Act The Public Service Pensions Act 2013.
Administering Authority A body listed in Part 1 of Schedule 3 of the
Regulations who maintains a fund within the
LGPS.
Code of Practice The Regulator’s Code of Practice no. 14 entitled
“Governance and administration of public service
3
pension schemes”.
DCLG The Department for Communities and Local
Government.
DPA Data Protection Act 1998.
FOIA Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Investment Regulations The Local Government Pension Scheme
(Management and Investment of Funds)
Regulations 2009.
IPSPC Independent Public Service Pensions Commission.
LGPS The Local Government Pension Scheme - a
scheme for the payment of pensions and other
benefits to or in respect of persons working in local
government service in England and Wales or for
other bodies that participate in the LGPS.
Local Pension Board The board established to assist the Administering
Authority as the Scheme Manager for each Fund.
Pension Committee A committee or sub-committee to which an
Administering Authority has delegated its pension
function.
Regulations The Local Government Pension Scheme
Regulations 2013 (as amended).
Regulator The Pensions Regulator.
Responsible Authority The Secretary of State for Communities and Local
Government being the person who makes
regulations for a pension scheme established
under section 1 of the 2013 Act.
Rules of Procedure The rules governing the decision making process
of the Administering Authority as set out in its
constitution.
4
Scheme Advisory Board The Local Government Pension Scheme Advisory
Board established under the Regulations.
Scheme Manager A person or body responsible for managing or
administering a pension scheme established under
section 1 of the 2013 Act. In the case of the LGPS,
each Fund has a Scheme Manager which is the
Administering Authority.
Secretary of State The Secretary of State for Communities and Local
Government.
Transitional Regulations The Local Government Pension Scheme
(Transitional Provisions, Savings and Amendment)
Regulations 2014.
5
2. Background
LGPS Governance Structure Prior to April 2015
2.1 The LGPS is a statutory funded public service pension scheme. It differs in
legal status from trust based pension schemes in the private sector
because it is established under statute and not set up under a trust. It also
differs from most other statutory public service pension schemes which are
unfunded schemes. Matters of governance in the LGPS therefore need to
be considered on their own merits and with proper regard to the unique
legal status of the LGPS.
2.2 Prior to 1 April 2015, the LGPS has had a relatively straightforward
governance structure which includes the Secretary of State and the
Administering Authority.
2.3 Each Administering Authority is responsible for managing and administering
the LGPS in relation to any person for which it is the appropriate
administering authority under the Regulations. The Administering Authority
is responsible for maintaining and investing its own Fund within the LGPS.
2.4 How an Administering Authority delegates its LGPS function is largely a
matter for each Administering Authority. The majority of Administering
Authorities are local authorities and therefore operate in accordance with
local government law. However some Administering Authorities are not
local authorities such as the Environment Agency, the London Pensions
Fund Authority and the South Yorkshire Pensions Authority. Such bodies
operate in accordance with their own legal constitutions.
The Road to Reform
2.5 June 2010: Lord Hutton of Furness is appointed by Government to chair the
IPSPC and undertake a fundamental structural review of public service
pension provision and to make recommendations to the Chancellor and
Chief Secretary to the Treasury on future pension arrangements.
2.6 October 2010: The IPSPC produces its interim report.
2.7 March 2011: The IPSPC produces its final report making 27
recommendations for the reform of public service pension schemes
including:
6
properly constituted, trained and competent pension board with
member nominees, responsible for meeting good standards of
governance including effective and efficient administration;
a pension policy group for each public service pension scheme at
national level for considering major changes to scheme rules; and
independent oversight of the governance, administration and data
transparency of public service pension schemes.
2.8 December 2011: Following a meeting in November 2011, the Local
Government Association and lead members and officials from GMB,
UNISON and Unite conclude that discussions should be progressed with
the aim of reaching agreement on a set of high level principles for the
LGPS.
2.9 May 2012: The Local Government Association, GMB, UNISON and Unite
announce the outcome of their negotiations on new LGPS proposals to take
effect from 1 April 2014.
2.10 April 2013: The 2013 Act implementing most of the IPSPC’s
recommendations receives Royal Assent.
2.11 April 2014: The new career-average LGPS comes into force.
2.12 April 2015: The new governance structure for the LGPS and other public
service pension schemes come into force.
7
3. Legislative background and structure of governance arrangements
from 2015
Legislative requirements for governance in the LGPS
3.1 The Regulations require each Administering Authority to establish a Local
Pension Board for the purposes of assisting the Administering Authority in
line with the requirements set out in paragraph 3.27.
3.2 Local Pension Boards must be established no later than 1 April 2015.
Established in this context means that the Administering Authority must
have approved the establishment of the Local Pension Board, its
composition and also the terms of reference, in accordance with its
constitution. It does not necessarily mean that the Local Pension Board has
to be fully operational by this date. However, it is anticipated that a Local
Pension Board should be operational within a reasonably practicable period
after 1 April 2015 (being no longer than 4 months).
3.3 The Regulations set out the requirements relating to the new Local Pension
Boards.
Governance structure in the LGPS
3.4 Each Administering Authority is responsible for managing and administering
the LGPS in relation to any person for which it is the appropriate
administering authority under the Regulations. The Administering Authority
is responsible for maintaining and investing its own Fund for the LGPS.
3.5 Administering Authorities are defined in Part 1 of Schedule 3 of the
Regulations.
3.6 The majority of Administering Authorities are local authorities and therefore
operate in accordance with local government law requirements. However
some Administering Authorities are not local authorities such as the
Environment Agency, the London Pensions Fund Authority and the South
Yorkshire Pensions Authority. Such bodies operate in accordance with their
own legal constitutions.
3.7 In some instances, two or more Administering Authorities may share their
administration function, for example through a shared service arrangement,
or in other ways. However, where this happens each local authority still
retains its own individual Administering Authority status and therefore legal
responsibility for its own Fund.
8
3.8 The membership structure for the Local Pension Board required by
regulation 107 of the Regulations does not fit neatly into the standard
arrangements which exist for decision making on pensions issues and
existing established governance arrangements for Administering
Authorities. This section of the Guidance sets out the general legal
provisions which will assist in placing the Local Pension Board in the
context of decision making on wider pensions and financial matters.
3.9 For local authority Administering Authorities it is not permissible for
decisions about pension allowances or the amount of pension to be paid to
employees to be an executive decision (see The Local Authorities
(Functions and Responsibilities) (England) Regulations 2000 and The Local
Authorities Executive Arrangements (Functions and Responsibilities)
(Wales) Regulations 2001. This means that the executive (usually cabinet
or the elected mayor) cannot make decisions in relation to LGPS matters,
for example, how to exercise discretions under the Regulations.
3.10 This means in practice that decisions about pensions are delegated in
accordance with Section 101 of the 1972 Act to:
3.10.1 committees or sub-committees made up of that Administering
Authority's councillors from all the political groups and will be
politically balanced (and some of these committees or sub-
committees also have additional co-opted members such as
employer and scheme member representatives); or
3.10.2 Administering Authority officers.
Some decisions will be reserved for full council, for example decisions
which have an impact on the budget.
3.11 Regulation 105 also provides that Administering Authorities may delegate
functions under the Regulations. This confirms the authority in Section 101
of the 1972 Act.
3.12 The delegation of pension functions varies from Administering Authority to
Administering Authority depending on local circumstances. The Regulations
require an Administering Authority’s governance compliance statement to
set out whether the Authority delegates its functions and the detail of the
delegation given. This includes the terms, structure and operation of the
delegation, the frequency of meetings, membership and voting rights.
9
3.13 Examples of delegation structures used by Administering Authorities can be
summarised as follows:
Governance compliance statements
3.14 To ascertain how an individual Administering Authority actually delegates its
pension function it is necessary to review its governance compliance
statement. Each Administering Authority must have in place a statement
setting out whether the Administering Authority delegates its functions, or
part of its functions under the Regulations to a committee, a sub-committee
or an officer of the authority.
3.15 Where the Administering Authority does delegate its functions, the
statement must include:
3.15.1 the terms, structure and operational procedures of the
delegation;
3.15.2 the frequency of any committee or sub-committee meetings;
3.15.3 whether such a committee or sub-committee includes
representatives of scheme employers or members, and if so,
whether those representatives have voting rights;
3.15.4 the extent to which a delegation, or the absence of a delegation,
complies with guidance given by the Secretary of State and, to
the extent that it does not so comply, the reasons for not
complying; and
3.15.5 details of the terms, structure and operational procedures relating
to the Local Pension Board.
3.16 Current governance compliance statements will need to be revised to
include the new information referred to in paragraph 3.15.5. The
Administering Authority
(1) Chief Financial Officer
Pension Advisory Panel
(3) Pension Committee
Sub - Committee(s)
Administering Authority
(4) Pension Committee
Consultative Panel
Administering Authority
(2) Pension Committee
Administering Authority
10
Administering Authority will firstly need to consult with such persons as it
thinks necessary about the revised statement and then publish it once it has
been revised.
New governance structure in the LGPS
3.17 From 1 April 2015, the new governance structure of the LGPS can be
summarised in the following diagram:
Post April 2015 LGPS Governance Structure
The Responsible Authority
3.18 In accordance with section 2 of the 2013 Act, each pension scheme
established under section 1 of the 2013 Act must have a ‘responsible
authority’ which is the person who may make regulations for that scheme.
3.19 In the case of the LGPS, the Responsible Authority is the Secretary of
State.
Administering Authority/Scheme Manager
3.20 Section 4 of the 2013 Act requires that, in the case of a pension scheme
established under section 1 of that Act, regulations must provide for a
‘scheme manager’. The scheme manager is the person who is responsible
for managing or administering the scheme.
Responsible Authority (Secretary of State)
Scheme Manager
(Administering Authority)
Scheme Advisory
Board
The Pensions Regulator
Pension Board
11
3.21 The Regulations specify that the ‘scheme manager’ responsible for the local
administration of pensions and other benefits payable under the LGPS shall
be each Administering Authority.
3.22 In the case of the LGPS, each Fund therefore has a Scheme Manager
which is the Administering Authority. This contrasts with other public service
pension schemes administered on a national basis, such as the Teachers’
Pension Scheme, where there is a single scheme manager for the whole
scheme.
3.23 As noted at paragraph 3.4 an Administering Authority is responsible for
managing and administering the LGPS in relation to any person for which it
is the appropriate administering authority under the Regulations. The
Administering Authority is responsible for maintaining and investing its own
Fund for the LGPS. This means the Administering Authority is responsible
for making all decisions relating to the operation of the Fund.
3.24 The creation of new Local Pension Boards does not change the core role of
the Administering Authority or the way it delegates its pension functions.
However, when establishing its Local Pension Board, the Administering
Authority may wish to take the opportunity to review its current delegation
structure to see if it remains fit for purpose.
3.25 For example, where there is an advisory panel advising a Pension
Committee, the Administering Authority may wish to consider the extent to
which the advisory panel’s functions are superseded by the new Local
Pension Board. An existing panel of this nature is not a Local Pension
Board and should not be re-badged as such. A new Local Pension Board
should be properly established and the existing arrangements then
reviewed.
Local Pension Boards
3.26 Section 5 of the 2013 Act requires that, in the case of a pension scheme
established under section 1 of that Act, regulations must provide for the
establishment of a board with responsibility for assisting the scheme
manager(s) in relation to specified matters. In turn, this has resulted in the
requirement for Local Pension Boards for each Administering Authority in
the LGPS under the Regulations.
12
3.27 Regulation 106(1) of the Regulations specifies that each Administering
Authority shall establish its own Local Pension Board with responsibility for
assisting the Administering Authority:
3.27.1 to secure compliance with:
3.27.1.1 the Regulations;
3.27.1.2 other legislation relating to the governance and
administration of the LGPS; and
3.27.1.3 the requirements imposed by the Regulator in relation
to the LGPS, and
3.27.2 to ensure the effective and efficient governance and
administration of the LGPS.
3.28 Assisting the Administering Authority should be interpreted as helping the
Administering Authority, including doing work requested by the
Administering Authority. The role of the Local Pension Board should be
interpreted as covering all aspects of governance and administration of the
LGPS, including funding and investments. However, the Local Pension
Board does not replace the Administering Authority or make decisions
which are the responsibility of the Administering Authority under both the
Regulations and other overriding legislation. The Administering Authority
can choose to delegate duties to the Local Pension Board within the
parameters of the Regulations.
3.29 The role and remit of a Local Pension Board is considered in more detail in
Schedule A.
3.30 Regulation 106(9) of the Regulations specifies that the expenses of a Local
Pension Board shall be regarded as part of the costs of administration of
the Fund. This is considered in more detail in section 9, Resourcing and
Funding.
Scheme Advisory Board
3.31 Section 7 of the 2013 Act requires that, in the case of a pension scheme
established under section 1 of that Act, regulations must provide for the
establishment of a board with responsibility for providing advice to the
responsible authority, at the authority's request, on the desirability of
13
changes to the scheme. The responsible authority must have regard to
such advice.
3.32 Where a scheme has more than one scheme manager (and accordingly
there is more than one pension board for the scheme), regulations may also
provide for the Scheme Advisory Board to provide advice (on request or
otherwise) to the scheme managers or the scheme's pension boards in
relation to the effective and efficient administration and management of the
scheme or any pension fund of the scheme.
3.33 In turn, Section 7 has resulted in the requirement for the Scheme Advisory
Board for the LGPS under the Regulations. The Scheme Advisory Board for
the LGPS is established by the Regulations and is responsible for providing
advice:
3.33.1 to the Secretary of State on the desirability of making changes to
the LGPS; and
3.33.2 to the Administering Authorities and Local Pension Boards in
relation to the effective and efficient administration and
management of the LGPS and the Funds.
3.34 In both cases, the Secretary of State and Administering Authorities
(including those with delegated responsibility, i.e. Pension Committees (or
sub-committees) and Officers) or Local Pension Boards must have regard
to advice issued by the Scheme Advisory Board in accordance with section
7(3) of the 2013 Act.
14
4. The Pensions Regulator
4.1 The regulatory powers of the Regulator were extended under section 17
and Schedule 4 of the 2013 Act to cover some aspects of public service
pension schemes, including the LGPS.
4.2 The Regulator is an existing body corporate established by the 2004 Act.
Prior to 1 April 2015, the Regulator regulated occupational and personal
pension schemes provided primarily through private sector employers.
4.3 The Regulator has a number of statutory objectives including to:
4.3.1 protect the benefits of pension scheme members,
4.3.2 promote, and improve understanding of, the good administration
of work-based pension schemes,
4.3.3 maximise compliance with the duties and safeguards of the
Pensions Act 2008; and
4.3.4 minimise any adverse impact on the sustainable growth of an
employer (in relation to the exercise of the Regulator's functions
under Part 3 of the Pensions Act 2004 only).
4.4 The 2013 Act introduces a framework for the regulatory oversight of aspects
of the governance and administration of public service pension schemes by
the Regulator from 1 April 2015, through expanding its current role.
4.5 The Regulator has oversight in areas such as those listed in paragraph 4.6
below and may issue codes of practice for public service pension schemes
in these areas.
4.6 The Regulator has issued the Code of Practice which covers:
4.6.1 knowledge and understanding required by pension board
members (see paragraphs 33 to 60 of the Code of Practice);
4.6.2 conflicts of interest and representation (see paragraphs 61 to 91
of the Code of Practice);
4.6.3 reporting breaches of the law (see paragraphs 241 to 275 of the
Code of Practice);
4.6.4 publishing information about schemes (see paragraphs 92 to 99
of the Code of Practice);
15
4.6.5 internal controls (see paragraphs 101 to 120 of the Code of
Practice);
4.6.6 scheme record-keeping (see paragraphs 122 to 146 of the Code
of Practice);
4.6.7 maintaining contributions (see paragraphs 147 to 186 of the
Code of Practice);
4.6.8 providing information to members (see paragraphs 187 to 211 of
the Code of Practice) ; and
4.6.9 internal dispute resolution (see paragraphs 213 to 240 of the
Code of Practice).
4.7 However, only the areas of knowledge and understanding, conflicts of
interest and representation and reporting breaches of the law have direct
application to Local Pension Boards. The other areas apply to Administering
Authorities, although there are areas that a Local Pension Board will need
to be aware of in order to assist the Administering Authority.
4.8 This Guidance takes into account the principles of the Code of Practice
where relevant and applies them to the LGPS.
4.9 For the avoidance of doubt the powers of the Regulator were not extended
to cover areas such as the funding and investment of Funds.
The Regulator’s Powers
4.10 The Regulator will have a range of enforcement powers under the 2013 Act
including:
4.10.1 the power to appoint a person to assist a Local Pension Board in
the discharge of its functions if the Regulator considers it
desirable for the purpose of ensuring compliance with relevant
“pensions legislation”;
4.10.2 the power to issue an ‘improvement notice’ to an Administering
Authority or to a member(s) of a Local Pension Board directing
them to take, or refrain from taking, such steps as are specified
in the notice in order to remedy or prevent a recurrence of a
contravention of “pensions legislation”;
16
4.10.3 the power to issue a ‘third party notice’ directing a third party to
take, or refrain from taking, such steps as are specified in the
notice in order to remedy or prevent a recurrence of a
contravention of “pensions legislation”;
4.10.4 the power to issue a ‘report notice’ to an Administering Authority
or to a member(s) of a Local Pension Board requiring them to
provide a report on a specified matter(s) which are relevant to the
exercise of any of the Regulator's functions;
4.10.5 the power to require Administering Authorities and members of
Local Pension Boards to produce documents and information;
4.10.6 the power to inspect premises;
4.10.7 the power to apply for an injunction;
4.10.8 the power to apply for restitution where there has been a misuse
or misappropriation of any Fund assets;
4.10.9 the power to recover unpaid contributions on behalf of an
Administering Authority; and
4.10.10 the power to impose civil penalties for breaches of certain
pensions legislation including the duty for Administering
Authorities and members of Local Pension Boards to report
breaches of the law, the duty for Administering Authorities to
report the late payment of employer contributions and the failure
to comply with an ‘improvement notice’ or a ‘report notice’.
4.11 As noted above, certain powers of the Regulator are limited to
contravention of “pensions legislation”. For this purpose, “pensions
legislation” has a specific meaning and includes certain pieces of core
pensions legislation which apply to both public and private sector schemes
(the Pension Schemes Act 1993; parts of the Pensions Act 1995; the
Pensions Act 2004; and statutory provisions on pension sharing on
divorce). In terms of the legislation contained in the 2013 Act, “pensions
legislation” only includes sections 5(4) (pension board: conflicts of interest
and representation), 6 (pension board: information), 14 (information about
benefits) and 16 (records).
17
4.12 Of the 2013 Act provisions, only section 5(4) (pension board: conflicts of
interest and representation) has direct relevance to a Local Pension Board,
as the other sections relate to Scheme Manager responsibilities.
4.13 The other listed statutory provisions are relevant to the extent that a Local
Pension Board is responsible for assisting the Administering Authority to
comply with legislation relating to the governance and administration of the
LGPS (which will include certain elements of the listed statutes). In all
cases, the term “pensions legislation” covers both the statutory provisions
listed and any secondary legislation made under those provisions.
Reporting Local Pension Board Members to the Administering Authority
4.14 If the Regulator has reasonable grounds to suspect or believe that a
member of a Local Pension Board:
4.14.1 has misappropriated any assets of the Fund or is likely to do so;
or
4.14.2 has a conflict of interest in relation to the investment of assets of
the Fund
the Regulator must report the matter to the Administering Authority.
However, given that a member of Local Pension Board should not have
access to Fund assets or be involved in the investment of Fund assets then
the exercise of this duty should be rare in practice.
18
5. Constitution and Membership of a Local Pension Board
5.1 As noted at paragraph 3.2, Local Pension Boards must be established no
later than 1 April 2015. Established in this context means that the
Administering Authority must have approved the establishment of the Local
Pension Board, its composition and also the terms of reference, in
accordance with its constitution. It does not necessarily mean that the Local
Pension Board has to be fully operational by this date. However, it is
anticipated that a Local Pension Board should be operational within a
reasonably practicable period after 1 April 2015 (being no longer than 4
months).
5.2 The responsibility for establishing a Local Pension Board rests with the
Administering Authority of each Fund. This is something the Administering
Authority must do; it is not optional.
5.3 For many Administering Authorities, all existing pension functions are likely
to be delegated to a Pension Committee or an officer. However, it is open to
an Administering Authority to exercise directly any function which it has
delegated.
5.4 In light of the fact that the role of the Local Pension Board is to assist the
Administering Authority, the Administering Authority will need to carefully
consider the establishment of the Local Pension Board and the appointment
of its members. It should therefore be a function undertaken by the
Administering Authority (for example full council) rather than by the
delegated Pension Committee or officer.
5.5 An Administering Authority is given power under regulation 106(6) of the
Regulations to determine the procedures applicable to its Local Pension
Board, including the establishment of sub-committees and the payment of
expenses. When exercising this power (as provided for in the 2013 Act), the
Administering Authority must do so in accordance with usual local
government principles, acting reasonably and within the powers set out in
the Regulations.
5.6 Regulation 106(2) of the Regulations provides that where a local authority
Administering Authority delegates its pension functions to a Pensions
Committee, then with Secretary of State approval, the Pensions Committee
may also undertake the role of the Local Pension Board. Please see section
10 of this guidance for further details.
19
Membership of a Local Pension Board
5.7 A Local Pension Board must include an equal number of employer and
member representatives with a minimum requirement of no fewer than four
in total. In addition, the Regulations do not preclude that other members
may also be appointed to the Board.
5.8 No officer or councillor of an Administering Authority who is responsible for
the discharge of any function under the Regulations (apart from any
function relating to Local Pension Boards or the Scheme Advisory Board)
may be a member of the Local Pension Board of that authority.
5.9 The officers of the Administering Authority who would be precluded from
being a member of the Local Pension Board would be any officer named in
the scheme of delegation for that Administering Authority, for example the
section 151 officer and the head of investments. It would also be
appropriate to consider whether officers of the Fund at a senior level, who
are not named in the formal scheme of delegation but who are responsibility
for discharging functions under the Regulations should also be precluded
from being a member of the Local Pension Board.
5.10 Where an elected member of the Administering Authority is appointed as a
member of the Local Pension Board this can only be as either an employer
or member representative under the provisions of regulation 107(3)(b).
5.11 When determining the size of its Local Pension Board, the Administering
Authority should consider the capacity of the Board to undertake its role in
assisting the Administering Authority with the governance and
administration of the scheme. The Administering Authority will need to
consider a number of factors including (without limitation):
5.11.1 the number of scheme members, the number and size of
employers;
5.11.2 the breadth and diversity of scheme members and employers,
5.11.3 the assets within the Fund and any collective arrangements in place
for them to make decisions or provide input in relation to Fund
matters;
5.11.4 the cost of establishing and operating the Board;
5.11.5 the existence or proposal to form any other advisory groups; and
20
5.11.6 the scope of the Board's remit and workplan.
5.12 As indicated in the Code of Practice the Administering Authority should
consider providing high quality pre-appointment training to proposed
members of the Local Pension Board.
Appointment of Local Pension Board Members
5.13 Each employer or member representative on a Local Pension Board will
potentially represent a significant range of employers or members (as
appropriate). It is therefore important that the methodology for appointment
ensures that representative Board members are truly representative.
5.14 All employers and members within a Fund must have equal opportunity to
be nominated for the role of employer or member representative through an
open and transparent process.
5.15 The Regulations also allow for the appointment of other Local Pension
Board members i.e. members who are not there to represent employers or
scheme members, this would include for example where an Administering
Authority wishes to appoint an independent chairperson to the Local
Pension Board.
Capacity of Representative Members
5.16 Regulation 107 of the Regulations also requires that the Administering
Authority must ensure that any person it wishes to appoint as an employer
or member representative has the capacity to represent the employers or
members (as appropriate) of the Fund.
5.17 It will be important to appoint members who have the time to commit to
attend meetings, undertake training and effectively represent employers
and members (as appropriate).
5.18 Whilst it is the responsibility of those members appointed to have the
capacity to represent employers and members respectively consideration
should also be given by employers to reasonable time off or 'facilities time'
to allow employees who are members of the Local Pension Board to
effectively carry out their role. Administering Authorities should highlight to
employers the work needed to carry out the role to encourage employers to
allow for reasonable time off for Local Pension Board members.
Administering Authorities could for example reimburse employers who
provide their employees (who are members of the Board) with paid time off
21
for and to attend Board meetings. See section 9 for more information on
the resourcing of Local Pension Boards. In addition whilst no member of
the Board should be better or worse off by undertaking a role on the Local
Pension Board the Administering Authority should encourage policies which
enable active participation on the Board and therefore help in developing an
effective Board.
5.19 The Regulations specify a Local Pension Board member should not have a
conflict of interest, and then go on to clarify that a financial or other conflict
of interest will not arise merely by virtue of a member of a Local Pension
Board being a member of the LGPS and/or Fund. The potential for conflicts
of interest is considered in section 7 of this guidance.
5.20 An individual’s ability to properly represent the interests of employers or
members (as appropriate) and channel information back to those persons
effectively should also be a key factor in selecting members of the Local
Pension Board. This needs to take account of the wide range of
membership of the Fund to ensure all employers and members are
represented.
Appointment of Other Members
5.21 As noted at paragraph 5.8, no officer or councillor of an Administering
Authority who is responsible for the discharge of any function under the
Regulations (apart from any function relating to Local Pension Boards or the
Scheme Advisory Board) may be a member of the Local Pension Board of
that authority.
5.22 The requirement for capacity does not explicitly apply to other (i.e. non-
representative) members appointed by the Administering Authority.
Nevertheless, the Administering Authority should have an open and
transparent process for the appointment of such members.
5.23 As noted at paragraph 5.10 an elected member of the Administering
Authority cannot be appointed to the Local Pension Board as an 'other
member'.
5.24 Where an Administering Authority decides to appoint an independent chair
to the Board, that chair would be considered an 'other member'.
22
The Process for Appointing Employer and Member Representatives
5.25 The methodology for appointing employer and member representatives is
not prescribed by the Regulations. It will therefore fall to each Administering
Authority to establish an appropriate process. Options may include (but are
not limited to):
Direct Appointment Process
5.25.1 Selecting employer representatives through existing employer
forums, for example nominations and voting at employer AGMs.
5.25.2 Selecting member representatives through existing representative
organisations for example recognised trade unions, staff
committees, member representative committees, pensioner
organisations or nominations and voting at member AGMs (this
could include active, deferred and pensioner members of the
scheme).
Two Stage Nomination and Selection Process
5.25.3 Administering authorities may wish to consider methodologies
used by private sector trust based schemes to appoint member-
nominated trustees (“MNTs”). MNTs must be:
5.25.3.1 nominated as the result of a process
which includes at least all the active
and pensioner members of the scheme
(or an organisation which adequately
represents them); and
5.25.3.2 selected as a result of a process which
involves some or all of the members of
the scheme.
5.25.4 Seeking nominations by advertising in local newspapers and on
websites (including employer and member representative bodies
websites).
5.25.5 Encouraging partner organisations or admission bodies to nominate
members.
5.26 When selecting members, proper regard must be given to the obligations of
the Administering Authority in relation to equal opportunities in any
recruitment process. In practice, this means having an open and
23
transparent process, with a role specification. Depending on the
appointment process used by the Administering Authority, it may also be
necessary to have a formal interview process before appointments are
made (if for example more nominations are received than available places
on the Board). The interview process should assess the ability of the
individual to meet the requirements of the role and make appointment on
merit.
5.27 It is also important to ensure that those who are appointed have a range of
experience so that there is a good balance and breadth of experience on
the Local Pension Board.
Making Appointments
5.28 As noted in other sections, the appointment process provides an ideal
opportunity for the Administering Authority to obtain confirmation from the
appointee in the form of a written undertaking that they understand the
requirements of the role and to commit to those requirements, for example
by:
5.28.1 disclosing all interests and responsibilities which have the potential
to become conflicts of interest (see paragraph 7.36);
5.28.2 committing to attend a minimum number of meetings a year;
5.28.3 committing to undertake and attend the necessary knowledge and
understanding training (see paragraph 6.23); and
5.28.4 undertaking to abide by the Board’s terms of reference and wider
constitutional documents.
Term of Office
5.29 Consideration should be given to the term of office so that experience is
retained on the Local Pension Board. This could be by a proportion of
members retiring on a rolling basis so that the Local Pension Board has the
benefit of gaining new members with new experience whilst also retaining
existing experienced members and stability for the Local Pension Board.
5.30 The ability of members to seek re-appointment for a further term needs to
be considered. Given the complexity of the subject matter there is a case
for renewing membership over an extended period.
24
Termination
5.31 As well as dealing with the terms of appointment, the Administering
Authority should also consider the circumstances in which a member of a
Local Pension Board should cease to be a member.
5.32 Clearly this will arise at the expiry of a member’s term of office, although
there may well be other circumstances in which a member’s term of office
may end, for example the Administering Authority should consider suitable
provisions if:
5.32.1 a member has a conflict of interest which cannot be managed in
accordance with the Board’s conflicts policy;
5.32.2 a member dies or becomes incapable of acting;
5.32.3 a member who is a councillor of the Administering Authority is
appointed to a Pensions Committee;
5.32.4 a member is appointed to the role of an officer of the Administering
Authority with responsibility for the discharge of functions under the
Regulations;
5.32.5 a member wishes to resign, for example how much notice should
be given and in what form;
5.32.6 a representative member ceases to represent his constituency, for
example if an employer representative leaves the employment of
his employer and therefore ceases to have the capacity to
represent the Fund’s employers; and
5.32.7 a member fails to attend meetings or otherwise comply with the
requirements of being a Board member, for example fails to attend
the necessary knowledge and understanding training. The
Administering Authority should consider who would decide this,
whether the member should be given an opportunity to change their
behaviour and how much notice should be given and in what form.
Where issues of this nature arise, the chair of the Local Pension
Board should have lead responsibility for an initial informal
discussion with the member about the concerns. It would be helpful
for the chair of the Local Pension Board to be supported and
advised by professional advisers with that discussion. This could
be an Administering Authority officer provided there was no conflict
25
of interest. The matter could also be raised with any body which
had nominated the individual for appointment.
5.33 Where a vacancy arises for a representative member mid–term, the
Administering Authority should consider the process to be used to fill that
vacancy.
Terms of Reference
5.34 The Administering Authority when establishing its Local Pension Board
should create terms of reference for the Board on the basis that the Board
is a stand-alone body. The terms of reference are the rules setting out how
the Board will be constituted and operate on a day to day basis. The terms
of reference for a Local Pension Board should be reviewed periodically and
at each material change in regulations impacting on Local Pension Boards.
5.35 It is worth noting that under regulation 106(8) of the Regulations a Local
Pension Board shall have the general power to do anything which is
calculated to facilitate, or is conducive or incidental to, the discharge of any
of its functions. However, as a minimum a Board’s terms of reference
should include areas such as:
5.35.1 Function of the Board – The terms should set out the function of
the Board to assist the Administering Authority to secure
compliance and ensure the effective and efficient governance and
administration of the LGPS in line with the requirements set out at
paragraph 3.27 and Schedule A.
5.35.2 Membership – This should include the number of each category of
Board member (including other representatives), the appointment
and selection process, term of office and procedures for termination
of office.
5.35.3 Code of Conduct – The terms of reference should refer to the
requirement for the Local Pension Board to have a code of conduct
for its members and that members of the Board should abide by the
code (see paragraph 7.9).
5.35.4 Voting Rights – The terms should set out that employer and
member representatives of the Board have equal voting rights. The
terms should also indicate where the chair is from either the
employer or member representatives whether the chair has a
26
casting vote. It should be noted that other members do not have
voting rights on the Board.
5.35.5 Conflict of Interests – The terms should refer to the requirement
for the Board to always act within the terms of reference. The Local
Pension Board should have a conflicts policy for its members and
that members should abide by the policy and provide information
that the Administering Authority may reasonably require from time
to time to ensure that members do not have a conflict of interest
(see paragraph 7.40).
5.35.6 Appointment of a Chair/Vice-Chair – The terms should specify
whether the Board is to have a chair and/or vice-chair and if so
specify the roles of the chair and/or vice-chair, how they are
appointed and whether the chair is to be given a casting vote (only
where the chair is from the member or employer representatives on
the Local Pension Board). This should include the leadership
responsibilities of the chair to ensure that meetings are properly
conducted, decision making is clear and professional advice is
followed. It will also set out the role of the chair in agreeing the
agenda and approving the minutes for each meeting.
5.35.7 Role of Advisors – The terms should set out the role of
professional advisers, or other advisors to the Board and the
process for their appointment and agreeing their fees. In addition
the process for the Board accessing existing advisors to the
Administering Authority should also be set out. Administering
Authorities may wish to use a shared pool of potential advisors, for
example having access to an agreed pool of senior pension fund
officers from other (possibly neighbouring) authorities.
5.35.8 Role of Officers – The terms should set out the role of officers of
the Administering Authority to the Board, for example in the
provision of secretariat services to the Board or providing pension
fund information to the Board.
5.35.9 Administration, Papers, Communication and Obtaining
Information – The terms should specify the terms for notice of
Board meetings, the circulation of papers in advance of meetings,
how meetings are to be run, the decision making process, recording
minutes of meetings, a procedure for dealing with urgent items of
business and the publication of information if considered relevant.
27
In addition where specific information may be required by the Board
details of where such information may be obtained from should be
provided to the Board. As the Local Pension Board is considered a
committee of the Administering Authority for certain overriding
statutory purposes such as FOIA and the Administering Authority is
a FOIA public authority, minutes should be carefully dealt with and
separated as appropriate into open and closed business, so that
open minutes (including agendas and relevant papers) can be
promptly published in the Administering Authority’s FOIA publication
scheme (see paragraph 8.22 to 8.23).
5.35.10 Organisation of meetings: The terms should specify how
meetings will be organised. It is anticipated that meetings will take
place separately from those of the Pension Committee. Should both
bodies choose to meet at the same time to consider the same
agenda, the terms should specify how those concurrent meetings
are chaired as well as acknowledging that the statutory roles and
function of the Pension Committee and the Board are separate
5.35.11 Number of Meetings – The terms should specify whether there
should be a minimum number of meetings in a year. The frequency
of Pension Committee meetings may serve as a useful benchmark
for how often the Board should meet. There should also be an
ability for a specified number of Board members or the
Administering Authority to require a special meeting to be convened
on notice.
5.35.12 Location and time of meetings – The terms should specify any
restrictions in relation to the time (for example, during working hours
only), and location of meetings and whether the meetings are to be
public or not. Decisions about the time and location of meetings
should be made whilst also being aware of the capacity
requirements placed upon Board members.
5.35.13 Quorum – The terms should specify a quorum for meetings and in
particular whether the quorum should include a minimum number of
employer and member representatives.
5.35.14 Attendance Requirements – The terms should specify the
requirements for attending meetings and the consequences of
continued failure to attend Board meetings.
28
5.35.15 Role of Substitutes – The terms should specify whether members
are allowed to send substitutes to meetings where they are unable
to attend themselves. This may be more appropriate for employer
and member representatives. Training requirements should also be
considered where substitutes are permitted.
5.35.16 Creation of Working Groups/Sub-Committees – The terms
should specify whether the Board has the power to set up working
groups or sub-committees and if so on what terms (including terms
of reference for those working groups or sub-committees).
5.35.17 Allowances/Expenses – The terms should specify the policy in
relation to the payment of allowances and expenses to Board
members (see section 9 of this guidance for further information).
5.35.18 Budget – The terms of reference should also set out a process for
the Local Pension Board to have access to a budget for specified
purposes, for example seeking professional advice, training for
members, accommodation costs or meeting the costs of any claim
for expenses and the timetable for approving that Budget.
5.35.19 Knowledge and Understanding – The terms should refer to the
requirement for the Board to have a policy and framework to meet
the knowledge and understanding requirements of the 2004 Act
(see section 6 of this guidance).
5.35.20 Reporting – The terms should include arrangements for the
reporting of information to the Administering Authority, including
direct reporting arrangements where the Board has material
concerns (see section 8 of this guidance). In addition the methods
used to communicate to scheme members and employers should
be included.
5.35.21 Data Protection – The terms should take account of the
Administering Authority’s role as a ‘data controller’ under data
protection legislation and any policies, such as a data protection
policy, with which it must comply as well as ensuring personal data
processing by the Local Pension Board is within the Administering
Authority’s notification registered with the Information
Commissioner from time to time (which should be reviewed and
updated as necessary) – see paragraphs 8.17 to 8.21 for further
details.
29
5.36 The terms of reference should be approved by the Administering Authority.
The terms of reference should also be formally adopted by the Local
Pension Board once it is established. This would normally be expected to
occur at the Board's first meeting.
Chair of the Local Pension Board
5.37 As per 5.34.6 the appointment of a chair/vice chair should be detailed in the
Local Pension Board's terms of reference.
5.38 A chair could be appointed in a number of ways including:
5.38.1 a chair may be appointed by the employer and member
representatives of the Board from amongst their own number or
on a rotating basis with the term of office shared between an
employer and a member representative on an equal basis.
5.38.2 an independent chair may be appointed by the Administering
Authority. Such a chair would count in the number of other
representatives on the Board. An independent chair would have
no pre-existing employment, financial or other material interest in
either the Administering Authority or any scheme employer in a
fund or funds administered by the Administering Authority or
would not be a scheme member of the LGPS in a fund
administered by the Administering Authority. The appointment of
an independent chair should be subject to the passing of a
motion to confirm this by a majority of the employer and member
representatives of the Board.
5.39 In their role the Chair of the Board:
5.39.1 shall ensure the Board delivers its purpose as set out in the
Board's terms of reference,
5.39.2 shall ensure that meetings are productive and effective and that
opportunity is provided for the views of all Board members to be
expressed and considered, and
5.39.3 shall seek to reach consensus and ensure that decisions are
properly put to a vote when that cannot be reached ensuring that
instances of a failure to reach a consensus position will be
recorded and published.
30
5.40 Where an Administering Authority appoints an independent chair
consideration should be given to a clause within their contract for the role
where they must agree to treat any confidential information as such and not
to use for any potential financial or material gains.
Other Constitutional Documents
5.41 In addition to the terms of reference a Board is likely to have other key
documents which would be included in its wider constitution. These may
include:
5.41.1 A code of conduct (see paragraphs 7.9 to 7.11);
5.41.2 A conflicts policy (see paragraphs 7.40 to 7.41);
5.41.3 A knowledge and understanding policy document (see paragraph
6.8) including a list of the core documents recording policy about
the administration of the Fund; and
5.41.4 Policies dealing with data protection, information security,
acceptable use (and monitoring) and subject access request (see
paragraph 8.21).
Failure to Establish a Local Pension Board
5.42 If an Administering Authority fails to establish its Local Pension Board by 1
April 2015, or having done so the Board fails to exercise its role, the
question then arises as to what steps might be taken and by whom to
challenge the action or lack of action of the Administering Authority. There
are a number of potential possibilities:
5.42.1 Intervention by the Regulator.
5.42.2 Intervention by legal action - In principle an action by way of judicial
review could be launched to ensure compliance where there has
been failure to comply with a statutory obligation. It will be
necessary to consider who might have interest or standing to bring
such an action. Potentially this could be a body or person who has
been denied representation by the failure to establish the Local
Pension Board.
5.42.3 Complaint to the Local Government Ombudsman or Pensions
Ombudsman. A failure by the Administering Authority to establish a
31
Local Pension Board is likely to constitute maladministration on the
part of the Administering Authority.
5.42.4 Adverse comment by the Administering Authority’s external auditor
in the context of the Annual Audit letter.
5.42.5 Adverse comment by the Scheme Advisory Board.
5.43 The Secretary of State has overarching responsibility for the Scheme as the
Responsible Body - with a clear interest in the successful implementation of
local pension boards.
Action Points:
Administering Authority to have approved the establishment (including
Terms of Reference) of the Local Pension Board by 1 April 2015.
The Local Pension Board must be operational (i.e. had its first meeting no
later than 4 months after the 1 April 2015).
32
6. Board Knowledge and Understanding
Legal requirements
6.1 In accordance with section 248A of the 2004 Act, every individual who is a
member of a Local Pension Board must:
6.1.1 be conversant with:
6.1.1.1 the rules of the LGPS, in other words the Regulations
and other regulations governing the LGPS (including
the Transitional Regulations, earlier regulations and the
Investment Regulations); and
6.1.1.2 any document recording policy about the administration
of the Fund which is for the time being adopted in
relation to the Fund, and
6.1.2 have knowledge and understanding of:
6.1.2.1 the law relating to pensions; and
6.1.2.2 such other matters as may be prescribed.
6.2 A Local Pension Board member should be aware that their legal
responsibilities begin from the date they take up their role on the Board and
so should immediately start to familiarise themselves with the documents as
referred to in paragraph 6.1.1 and the law relating to pensions.
6.3 In accordance with section 248A, the knowledge and understanding
requirement applies to every individual member of a Local Pension Board
rather than to the members of a Local Pension Board as a collective group.
General Principles
6.4 Administering Authorities should also take account of this Guidance to
support them in understanding the requirement and to enable them to help
members of the Local Pension Board to meet their knowledge and
understanding obligations.
6.5 Administering Authorities should make appropriate training available to
Local Pension Board members to assist them in undertaking their role and
where possible support all members of the Board in undertaking that
training. Where Local Pension Board members do not demonstrate their
33
capacity to attend and complete training then the Administering Authority
may need to consider whether that Local Pension Board member has the
capacity to undertake their role on the Board. See paragraph 5.31.7 for
further information.
6.6 Knowledge and understanding must be considered in light of the role of a
Local Pension Board to assist the Administering Authority in line with the
requirements set out at paragraph 3.27.
6.7 However, members of a Local Pension Board clearly need to understand
the duties and obligations of the Administering Authority, including funding
and investment matters, in order to be able to assist it.
6.8 Once created, a Local Pension Board should establish and maintain a
policy and framework to address the knowledge and understanding
requirements that apply to its members. Where the Pensions Committee
has an existing knowledge and understanding policy already in place, it may
be sensible to see if this could be incorporated to cover both the Pensions
Committee and the Local Pension Board to avoid unnecessary duplication.
However the knowledge and understanding requirements of a Local
Pension Board and a Pension Committee may differ, especially given the
former’s statutory requirements.
6.9 The Local Pension Board may wish to designate a person to take
responsibility for ensuring that the knowledge and understanding framework
is developed and implemented. This could be a member of the Local
Pension Board or an external person, for example an officer of the
Administering Authority or a professional adviser.
Knowledge and Understanding for Pension Committee Members
6.10 The legal requirement for knowledge and understanding for members of a
Local Pension Board does not apply to members of a Pension Committee.
However, the requirement serves as a useful benchmark for the knowledge
and understanding that a member of a decision-making Pension Committee
should have.
The Regulator’s Code of Practice
6.11 The issue of knowledge and understanding is dealt with in the Regulator’s
Code of Practice (see paragraphs 34 to 60 of the Code of Practice). This
Guidance is intended to reflect the principles of the Code of Practice and
apply them in a LGPS context.
34
Degree of Knowledge and Understanding
6.12 Being conversant with the rules of the LGPS and any document recording
policy about the administration of the Fund means having a working
knowledge (i.e. a sufficient level of familiarity) of them so that members of a
Local Pension Board can use them effectively when carrying out their role
of assisting the Administering Authority.
6.13 In particular members of a Local Pension Board should understand the
rules and documents in enough detail to know where they are relevant to an
issue and where a particular provision or policy may apply.
6.14 In order to assist the Administering Authority, it is implicit that members of a
Local Pension Board understand the duties and obligations that apply to the
Administering Authority as well as to themselves.
6.15 The rules of the LGPS would include:
6.15.1 the Regulations;
6.15.2 the Investment Regulations; and
6.15.3 the Transitional Regulations (including any earlier Regulations as
defined in the Transitional Regulations to the extent they remain
applicable),
and any statutory guidance referred to in these regulations.
6.16 A Local Pension Board should prepare and keep updated a list of the core
documents recording policy about the administration of the Fund and make
sure that the list and documents (as well as the rules of the LGPS) are
accessible to its members.
6.17 Part 1 of Schedule B of this Guidance contains a list of documents which
are likely to be regarded as recording policy about the administration of a
Fund. This list should not be relied upon as being definitive and actual lists
are likely to vary from Fund to Fund. This Schedule has been added to this
guidance to assist Administering Authorities and Local Pension Boards to
quickly identify documents which record policy about the administration of a
Fund.
6.18 Members of a Local Pension Board should also be aware of the range and
extent of overriding law which applies to the LGPS and have sufficient
35
knowledge and understanding of the content and effect of that law to
recognise when and how it impacts on their role, responsibilities and duties.
6.19 Part 2 of Schedule B of this Guidance contains a summary of some of the
key areas of law relating to pensions generally and the LGPS in particular.
This summary should not be relied upon as being a definitive list of all the
areas of law that members of a Local Pension Board need to know about
and understand. This Schedule been added to this guidance to assist
Administering Authorities and Local Pension Boards to quickly identify key
areas of law that may be relevant.
6.20 Given the role of the Local Pension Board to assist the Administering
Authority, members of a Local Pension Board should have sufficient
knowledge and understanding to challenge any failure by the Administering
Authority to comply with the Regulations and other legislation relating to the
governance and administration of the LGPS (which should be interpreted as
including the Regulations and other legislation relating to investment and
funding matters) and/or any failure to meet the standards and expectations
set out the Code of Practice.
6.21 Members of a Local Pension Board should have a breadth of knowledge
and understanding that is sufficient to allow them to understand fully any
professional advice the Local Pension Board is given. Members should be
able to challenge any information or advice they are given and understand
how that information or advice impacts on any decision relating to the Local
Pension Board’s duty to assist the Administering Authority.
Acquiring, Reviewing and Updating Knowledge and Understanding
6.22 A Local Pension Board’s knowledge and understanding policy and
framework should provide for the acquisition and retention of knowledge
and understanding for its members.
6.23 Members of the Local Pension Board should commit sufficient time in their
learning and development alongside their other duties. Training is an
important part of the individual’s role and will help to ensure that they have
the necessary knowledge and understanding to effectively meet their legal
obligations to assist the Administering Authority.
6.24 Members of the Local Pension Board must be aware that their knowledge
and understanding responsibilities technically begin from the date they take
up their post. Therefore, members should immediately start to familiarise
36
themselves with the Regulations, key Fund documents and relevant
pensions law.
6.25 The Administering Authority should offer high quality induction training and
should provide relevant ongoing training for Board members. This could be
included in the normal training programme for members of the Pensions
Committee as well as a specific training programme for the Local Pension
Board.
6.26 It may also be useful for the Local Pension Board to have shared training
events with the Pensions Committee and/ or Pension Committees and
Local Pension Boards from other Funds to share knowledge and
experience.
6.27 There must be a practical recognition that it will take a newly appointed
member a reasonable period to attain the required full level of knowledge
and understanding (see paragraph 6.1). Consideration should also be given
to permitting newly appointed Local Pension Board members to overlap
with the outgoing member to allow them to shadow that Board member for
at least one Board meeting (where possible) as well as providing them with
high quality induction training.
6.28 A Local Pension Board’s knowledge and understanding policy and
framework should require its members to undertake a personal training
needs analysis and regularly review their skills, competencies and
knowledge to identify gaps or weaknesses.
6.29 Part 2 of Schedule B contains examples of areas of knowledge and
understanding that a member of a Local Pension Board might be expected
to have. These examples may assist a Board member in undertaking a
personal training needs analysis.
6.30 A personalised training plan should then be used to document and address
these promptly. This would be supported by any person the Local Pension
Board has designated to implement the knowledge and understanding
policy and framework.
6.31 Learning programmes should be flexible, allowing members of the Local
Pension Board to update particular areas of learning where required and
acquire new areas of knowledge in the event of any change. For example,
members of the Local Pension Board who take on new responsibilities in
37
their role will need to have knowledge and understanding which is relevant
to carry out those new responsibilities.
6.32 Learning programmes should deliver the appropriate level of detail to
ensure that Local Pension Board members have the required level of
knowledge and understanding specific to the LGPS.
6.33 The Regulator will be providing an e-learning programme which has been
developed to meet the needs of all members of public sector scheme
pension boards, whether or not they have access to other learning. It is not
anticipated that this e-learning module alone would provide the sufficient
level of LGPS specific training required for Local Pension Board members.
6.34 Members of a Local Pension Board and the Administering Authority should
investigate what other third party learning tools and courses are available
both for initial training requirements and any ongoing training needs
identified for members of the Local Pension Board. Administering
Authorities and Local Pension Boards should contact relevant advisors to
identify any training resources being made available. For example the
LGPC Secretariat will be providing training events for Local Pension Board
members with details available from their website.
6.35 Once a Local Pension Board is in operation and new appointments are
made in the future, mentoring by existing members could also be
considered. This could also help to ensure that historical and scheme
specific knowledge is retained when members of a Local Pension Board
change.
Demonstrating Knowledge and Understanding
6.36 The Local Pension Board should keep appropriate records of the learning
activities of individual members and the Local Pension Board as a whole.
This will assist members in demonstrating their compliance, if necessary,
with the legal requirement and how they have mitigated risks associated
with knowledge gaps. For example a good external learning programme
will maintain records of the learning activities of individuals on the
programme or of group activities, if these have taken place, which can be
provided to the Local Pension Board.
38
Action Points:
Once established a Local Pension Board should adopt a knowledge and
understanding policy and framework (possibly in conjunction with the
Pensions Committee if appropriate).
A Local Pension Board should designate a person to take responsibility for
ensuring that the knowledge and understanding policy and framework is
developed and implemented.
The Administering Authority should offer access to high quality induction
training and provide relevant ongoing training to the appointed members of
the Local Pension Board.
A Local Pension Board should prepare (and keep updated) a list of the core
documents recording policy about the administration of the Fund and make
the list and documents (as well as the rules of the LGPS) accessible to its
members.
Members of a Local Pension Board should undertake a personal training
needs analysis and put in place a personalised training plan.
39
7. Conduct of Members and Conflicts of Interest
Introduction
7.1 There are various legal requirements which need to be considered to make
sure that sound governance principles are followed, and in particular that
conflicts of interest are properly managed. These include:
7.1.1 Section 5(5) of the 2013 Act, which defines “conflict of interest”
for the purpose of a Local Pension Board;
7.1.2 Regulation 108 of the Regulations, which places duties on the
Administering Authority to satisfy itself that Local Pension Board
members do not have conflicts of interest on appointment or
whilst they are members of the Board;
7.1.3 The 2011 Act, which requires councillors to comply with the
code of conduct of their local authority and to disclose interests;
7.1.4 The ‘Seven Principles of Public Life’, also known as the ‘Nolan
Principles’, with which any holder of public office is also expected
to comply; and
7.1.5 The expectations contained in the Code of Practice.
7.2 This section of the Guidance takes account of the above requirements and
gives guidance on how the different duties can be reconciled in a practical
way.
7.3 The importance of following these requirements needs to be clearly
appreciated at the outset. Failure to follow applicable codes of conduct or
declare a conflict of interest can impact on good governance in various
ways. For example, such failure may result in a Local Pension Board
actually acting improperly, may lead to a perception that the Local Pension
Board has acted improperly, or may result in a challenge to the work carried
out by the Board.
Codes of Conduct and Disclosure of Interests for Councillors
7.4 The elected and co-opted members of a local authority (referred to as
“councillors” for the purposes of this section of the Guidance) are governed
by their local authority’s code of conduct for councillors. This code is
required of every local authority by the 2011 Act and sets out the standards
of behaviour expected of individuals in their capacity as councillors.
40
7.5 In addition, there is a legal obligation for councillors to disclose, in a register
maintained by the authority’s monitoring officer, certain pecuniary interests,
as defined in regulations made under the 2011 Act.
7.6 Both of these requirements will apply to any members of a Local Pension
Board who are also councillors of a local authority (whether that is the
Administering Authority or another local authority). They will not apply to
members of a Local Pension Board who are not councillors unless they are
specifically adopted in terms of reference or other policy document to apply
to the other members of the Local Pension Board.
Seven Principles of Public Life
7.7 The members of a Local Pension Board should have regard to the 'Seven
Principles of Public Life' (known as the Nolan Principles), which are:
7.7.1 Selflessness - Holders of public office should act solely in terms
of the public interest. They should not do so in order to gain
financial or other benefits for themselves, their family or their
friends.
7.7.2 Integrity - Holders of public office should not place themselves
under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might seek to influence them in the
performance of their official duties.
7.7.3 Objectivity - In carrying out public business, including making
public appointments, awarding contracts, or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits, holders of public office
should make choices on merit.
7.7.4 Accountability - Holders of public office are accountable for
their decisions and actions to the public and must submit
themselves to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their office.
7.7.5 Openness - Holders of public office should be as open as
possible about all the decisions and actions that they take. They
should give reasons for their decisions and restrict information
only when the wider public interest clearly demands it.
7.7.6 Honesty - Holders of public office have a duty to declare any
private interests relating to their public duties and to take steps to
41
resolve any conflicts arising in a way that protects the public
interest.
7.7.7 Leadership - Holders of public office should promote and
support these principles by leadership and example.
7.8 As members of a publicly-funded body involved in the discharge of public
business, all members of a Local Pension Board should comply with these
principles in the exercise of their functions. They require the highest
standards of conduct.
Code of Conduct for Local Pension Boards
7.9 When establishing its Local Pension Board, the Administering Authority
should prepare and approve a code of conduct for the Board to adopt. The
code of conduct should set out the standards of behaviour expected of
members, incorporating the Seven Principles. An Administering Authority
may wish to effectively adopt some or all of an existing Code of Conduct for
the Local Pension Board. Once adopted, the Local Pension Board should
keep this code of conduct under regular review.
7.10 The code of conduct should also make reference to the need for members
of the Local Pension Board who are councillors to comply with any separate
code of conduct and disclosure requirements which apply to them in their
capacity as councillors (in other words, the Local Pension Board’s code
should make it clear that it is not an exhaustive statement of the standards
of behaviour required of Board members).
7.11 It is important that individual members of the Local Pension Board are
familiar with and understand the importance of following the principles in the
Board’s code of conduct, and the Board should arrange appropriate training
for members on this issue.
Conflicts of Interest – General Comments
7.12 As an introductory point, although there is a requirement for Local Pension
Board members not to have a conflict of interest, it is important to note that
the issue of conflicts of interest must be considered in light of the Local
Pension Board’s role, which is to assist the Administering Authority. The
Local Pension Board does not make decisions in relation to the
administration and management of the Fund: these rest with the
Administering Authority. As a result, it is not anticipated that significant
conflicts will arise in the same way as would be the case if the Board were
42
making decisions on a regular basis (compared, for example, to a Pensions
Committee). Nevertheless, steps need to be taken to identify, monitor and
manage conflicts effectively.
The Regulator’s Code of Practice on Conflicts of Interest
7.13 The Regulator has a particular role in relation to members of a Local
Pension Board and conflicts of interest. Whilst members of a Local Pension
Board may be subject to other legal requirements, when exercising
functions as a member of a Local Pension Board, the Regulator expects the
requirements which specifically apply by virtue of the 2013 Act to be met
and the standards of conduct and practice set out in its Code of Practice to
be complied with.
7.14 The Code of Practice offers guidance about managing potential conflicts
and the identification, monitoring and management of actual conflicts. This
Guidance is intended to reflect the principles of the Code of Practice and
apply them in a LGPS context.
What is a Conflict of Interest?
7.15 For the purposes of a member of a Local Pension Board, a ‘conflict of
interest’ is defined in section 5(5) of the 2013 Act as a financial or other
interest which is likely to prejudice a person’s exercise of functions as a
member of a Local Pension Board.
7.16 The 2013 Act also specifies that a conflict does not include a financial or
other interest arising merely by virtue of that person being a member of the
LGPS and/or Fund (or any connected scheme).
7.17 Therefore, a conflict of interest may arise when a member of a Local
Pension Board:
7.17.1 must fulfil their legal duty to assist the Administering Authority;
and
7.17.2 at the same time they have:
7.17.2.1 a separate personal interest (financial or otherwise); or
7.17.2.2 another responsibility in relation to that matter,
giving rise to a possible conflict with their first responsibility as a
Local Pension Board member.
43
Examples of Conflicts of Interest
7.18 Some examples of potential conflicts in this context would include:
7.18.1 A finance officer appointed as a member of a Local Pension
Board may, from time to time, be required to review a decision
which may be, or appear to be, in opposition to another interest
or responsibility. For example, they may be required as a
member of the Local Pension Board to review a decision which
involves the use of departmental resources to improve scheme
administration, whilst at the same time being tasked, by virtue of
their employment, with reducing departmental spending.
7.18.2 A member representative who works in the Administering
Authority’s internal audit department may be required as part of
his work to audit the Fund. For example, the employee may
become aware of confidential breaches of law by the Fund which
have not yet been brought to the attention of the Local Pension
Board.
7.18.3 An employer representative from the private sector may also
have a conflict of interest as a decision-maker in their own
workplace. For example, if an employer representative is drawn
from a company to which the Administering Authority has
outsourced its pension administration services and the Board are
reviewing the standards of service provided by it.
Identifying, Monitoring and Managing Conflicts – The Role of the
Administering Authority
7.19 The Regulations place a duty on the Administering Authority to satisfy itself
that those appointed to its Local Pension Board do not have an actual
conflict of interest prior to appointment and “from time to time” thereafter.
7.20 There is a corresponding duty on any person who is proposed to be
appointed to a Local Pension Board, and on an appointed member of a
Local Pension Board, to provide the Administering Authority with such
information as the Administering Authority reasonably requires to satisfy
itself that such person has no conflicts of interest.
7.21 To comply with its duty in relation to conflicts, the Administering Authority
needs to put procedures in place in respect of the appointment of members
and establish policies to be included in the Board’s constitution to ensure
44
that interests are declared, potential conflicts are identified and members of
the Board are trained and receive advice on conflicts. In doing so, the
Administering Authority may wish to delegate its duty in relation to conflicts
to a particular officer or officers, for example, the monitoring officer.
7.22 Looking first at the process of appointments, the Administering Authority
should ensure that members of a Local Pension Board are appointed under
procedures that require them to disclose any interests or responsibilities,
which could become conflicts of interest and which may adversely affect
their suitability for the role, before they are appointed. The appointment
process should facilitate scrutiny of potential areas of difficulty by eliciting
relevant information. The fact an individual could potentially have a conflict
of interest at some point in the future should not preclude an individual
being appointed provided he or she does not have an actual conflict of
interest when appointed.
7.23 All terms of engagement (for example, appointment letters and any
contracts for services) should include a clause requiring disclosure of all
interests and responsibilities which have the potential to become conflicts of
interest, as soon as they arise. All interests and responsibilities disclosed
should be recorded.
7.24 As regards the Administering Authority’s ongoing obligation to ensure that
members of the Local Pension Board do not have a conflict of interest, the
Administering Authority will need to keep appointments under review and
also monitor whether appointed members have potential conflicts of interest
and are declaring them appropriately. This could be achieved by requesting
reports from the Local Pension Board, perhaps annually.
Identifying, Monitoring and Managing Conflicts – The Role of the Local
Pension Board
7.25 Local Pension Boards should cultivate a culture of openness and
transparency. The need for continual consideration of conflicts should be
recognised. Disclosure of interests and responsibilities, which have the
potential to become conflicts of interest, should not be ignored.
7.26 The Local Pension Board should ensure that its members have a clear
understanding of their role and the circumstances in which they may find
themselves in a position of conflict of interest, and should know how
potential conflicts should be managed. Many Local Pension Board
members are likely to be familiar with the concept of a conflict of interests
45
and it should not be difficult to adapt established procedures to meet the
obligations in the 2013 Act and the Regulations.
7.27 Local Pension Boards should identify, monitor and manage dual interests
and responsibilities which are or have the potential to become conflicts of
interest.
7.28 Local Pension Boards should evaluate the nature of any dual interests and
responsibilities and assess the impact on their operations and good
governance were a conflict of interest to materialise.
7.29 When seeking to prevent a potential conflict of interest becoming
detrimental to the conduct or decisions of a Local Pension Board, the Board
should consider obtaining professional legal advice when assessing any
option.
7.30 A register of interests should provide a simple and effective means of
recording and monitoring dual interests and responsibilities.
7.31 Local Pension Boards should also capture decisions about how any
identified potential conflicts of interest should be managed – ideally, in their
register of interests.
7.32 Options for managing a potential conflict of interest from becoming an
actual conflict of interest, include:
7.32.1 a member withdrawing from the discussion and any decision-
making process;
7.32.2 the Board establishing a sub-board to review the issue (where
the terms of reference give the power to do so); or
7.32.3 a member resigning from the Board if the conflict is so
fundamental that it cannot be managed in any other way.
7.33 The Local Pension Board’s register of interests should be circulated to the
Local Pension Board for ongoing review it should be made available to the
Administering Authority and it should be published (for example, on the
Fund’s website). The Local Pension Board should report any concerns to
the Administering Authority and include in an annual report a section on
good governance and management of conflicts.
7.34 Conflicts of interest should be included as an opening agenda item at Local
Pension Board meetings, and revisited during the meeting where
46
necessary. This provides an opportunity for those present, including non-
Board members, to declare any dual interests and responsibilities, which
have the potential to become conflicts of interest, and to minute discussions
about how they will be managed so as to prevent an actual conflict arising.
7.35 Local Pension Boards should take time to consider what key decisions are
likely to be made during, for example, the year ahead and identify and
consider any conflicts of interest that may arise in respect of these future
decisions.
Considering Conflicts of Interest – Responsibilities of Board Members
7.36 It is important that individual members of the Local Pension Board know
how to identify when they have a potential conflict of interest which needs to
be declared and which may also restrict their ability to participate in
meetings or decision-making. They also need to appreciate that they have
a legal duty under the Regulations to provide information to the
Administering Authority in respect of conflicts of interest.
7.37 Individual Local Pension Board members should seek professional advice
from a nominated officer (for example, the monitoring officer or the chief
finance officer) or external advisers where necessary and the importance of
doing so should be emphasised in the Local Pension Board’s conflicts
policy.
Managing Adviser and Officer Conflicts
7.38 A Local Pension Board may need to seek specialist advice or support, for
example legal advice. The Board may use an officer of the Administering
Authority or a third party adviser. However, in both cases the Board should
be confident that such advice is independent and any potential or actual
conflicts are disclosed by the officer or adviser on a timely basis to the
Board. For example, an adviser may have a conflict of interest if he or she
(or the same firm) is also advising the Administering Authority.
7.39 The risk to the Local Pension Board is that the adviser does not provide, or
is not seen to provide, independent advice. Where there is likely to be a
conflict of interest in giving advice, the Board should consider carefully
whether it is appropriate to appoint the adviser in the first place. It may also
be necessary to consider carefully whether they should take steps to
remove an adviser who has already been appointed.
Conflicts Policy
47
7.40 When establishing its Local Pension Board, the Administering Authority
should prepare and approve a conflicts policy for the Board to adopt. The
conflicts policy should cover the points discussed in the preceding
paragraphs relating to the identification, monitoring and management of
potential conflicts of interest (including adviser conflicts). Once adopted, the
Local Pension Board should keep this policy under regular review.
7.41 The conflicts policy should include as a minimum:
7.41.1 examples of scenarios giving rise to conflicts of interest (which
may include those set out at paragraph 7.18 above);
7.41.2 how a conflict might arise specifically in relation to a member of a
Local Pension Board; and
7.41.3 the process to be followed by members of a Local Pension Board
and the Administering Authority to address a situation where
members are subject to a potential or actual conflict of interest.
Action Points:
An Administering Authority should prepare a code of conduct and a conflicts
policy for its Local Pension Board for approval in accordance with the
Administering Authority’s constitution and at the first meeting of the Local
Pension Board. The Local Pension Board should keep these under regular
review.
Training should be arranged for officers and members of a Local Pension
Board on conduct and conflicts.
A Local Pension Board should establish and maintain a register of interests
for its members.
48
8. Reporting
Internal Reporting
8.1 Each Administering Authority has the prime responsibility for establishing its
Local Pension Board and it is therefore appropriate and consistent with good
governance for the Local Pension Board to report to the Administering
Authority.
8.2 The reporting requirements will be for each Administering Authority to
determine and could include reporting and communicating with a range of
individuals and decision making bodies. This could include communication
with internal and external audit as well as reporting to the audit committee,
scrutiny or a corporate resources committee, as well as full council or
equivalent where appropriate. The agreed reporting requirements should be
reflected in the Local Pension Board's terms of reference.
8.3 There should also be more frequent reporting (perhaps quarterly or after the
Local Pension Board meets) to the Administering Authority/Pension
Committee and the chief finance officer and/or monitoring officer for example,
this could be achieved through sharing the minutes of Board meetings in a
timely manner.
8.4 The Local Pension Board should take responsibility in conjunction with the
Administering Authority for ensuring the necessary reports are prepared and
delivered.
8.5 Whilst the process for internal reporting will need to be determined locally,
the following examples may assist Administering Authorities and Local
Pension Boards when formalising their reporting lines:
8.5.1 The Local Pension Board should in the first instance report its
requests, recommendations or concerns to the Administering
Authority/Pension Committee based on the remit of the Board
(see paragraph 3.27 and Schedule A).
8.5.2 The Local Pension Board could report any concerns over a
decision made by the Pension Committee to that Committee
within a reasonable period of the decision coming to the Board's
attention.
49
8.5.3 On receipt of a report from the Local Pension Board the Pension
Committee should consider and respond to it within a reasonable
period.
8.5.4 The Local Pension Board could report any concerns over a
decision made by the Pension Committee to that Committee and
where it considers that a decision was in breach of the
Regulations (or overriding legislation) they may seek to challenge
that decision. Such requests for a motion to review or challenge
a decision must be subject to the agreement of the majority of
the voting Board members.
8.5.5 The Pension Committee should within a reasonable period,
consider and respond to a motion to review or in the case of a
motion to challenge to revisit the original decision.
8.5.6 Where the Local Pension Board is satisfied that there has been a
breach of the Regulations which has been reported to the
Pension Committee which has not been rectified within a
reasonable period of time the Local Pension Board is under an
obligation to escalate the breach using the appropriate route for
reporting breaches within that Administering Authority.
8.5.7 In addition where the Board fail to reach consensus on a decision
this should be recorded as such and noted in the minutes of the
meeting.
8.6 A report to full council (or equivalent) or another committee/officer the
Administering Authority has delegated to receive it, could include:
8.6.1 a summary of the work of the Local Pension Board;
8.6.2 details of areas reported to the Board to be investigated by the
Local Pension Board and how they have been dealt with;
8.6.3 details of any conflicts of interest that have arisen in respect of
individual Local Pension Board members and how these have
been managed;
8.6.4 whether there are any risks or other areas of potential concern
which the Board wishes to raise with the Administering Authority
(although legal advice to the Local Pension Board should not be
shared with a full council meeting and nor should a summary of
50
it, since once legal advice goes beyond the intended ‘client’ and /
or confidentiality is lost, privilege will be waived and this would
also have an impact on the availability of the FOIA exemption for
legally privileged information);
8.6.5 details of training received and future training needs;
8.6.6 the work plan for the last year and a draft of the work plan for the
following year; and
8.6.7 details of any expenses and other costs incurred by the Local
Pension Board and anticipated expenses for the forthcoming
financial year. These costs will be met as part of the
administration costs of the Fund.
8.7 The above topics should also form the basis of ongoing regular reports to the
Administering Authority/Pension Committee who should be asked to
comment on the draft work plan, for views on how complaints and risks
reported to the Board have been managed and confirm that the Local
Pension Board is acting within its terms of reference and in accordance with
good governance principles.
8.8 Information being reported from the Local Pension Board should also be
communicated to members and employers of the scheme to encourage
engagement and promote a culture of transparency.
Escalation by the Local Pension Board of more serious concerns
8.9 The terms of reference for the Local Pension Board should include
procedures for the Local Pension Board to report concerns which are
sufficiently serious to be reported directly at a higher level, or where a
concern has been raised with the Pension Committee and the Local Pension
Board consider the Pension Committee have not taken appropriate action to
rectify the issue (or appropriate action within a reasonable time period). Such
concerns may include a fundamental breach of the Regulations or a
fundamental failure by the Administering Authority to ensure the effective
governance of the Fund.
8.10 The terms of reference would need to identify to whom such concerns are
reported to. This could be to named officer(s), a sub-committee or Council (or
equivalent), or combination of these to avoid issues having to be reported
immediately to full Council.
51
8.11 Escalation via the Scheme Advisory Board or the Responsible Authority
where internal channels are not appropriate or considered to have failed may
also be an option used by the Local Pension Board. In addition it may be
appropriate to report serious concerns to the Regulator.
Internal Reporting - Conflicts of interest
8.12 All members of the Local Pension Board must provide the Administering
Authority with such information it reasonably requires for the purposes of
satisfying itself that none of the members of the Local Pension Board has a
conflict of interest. This is considered in more detail in section 7 of this
guidance.
Internal Reporting - Record-keeping
8.13 Where the Local Pension Board is established as a local authority committee
with the Secretary of States consent, in accordance with regulation 106(2) of
the Regulations, the usual provisions about transparency in respect of
access to information and reports will apply. In that case, the terms of
reference for the Local Pension Board should include provisions dealing with
the provision of agendas and reports in advance of Local Pension Board
meetings and making those publically available (with the exception of
confidential or personal information).
8.14 As a Local Pension Board is considered a committee of local government it
should consider publishing information as would be required by committees
of local government. The Regulator's Code of Practice advices that the Local
Pension Board should consider publishing reports, agendas, papers and
minutes, see paragraph 97 of that Code for further information. Any
confidential or personal information should not be published.
8.15 Minutes of meetings should also be available and published in accordance
with procedures for other meetings, for example on the website of the
Administering Authority.
8.16 All papers and records should be prepared to minimise personal data, to
separate all general confidential information and should be drafted wherever
possible as if they may be made public (whether directly or, if received by the
Administering Authority, through them).
52
Data Protection
8.17 For legal purposes a Local Pension Board is considered a committee of and
part of the Administering Authority legal entity (but a Local Pension Board is
not a committee created under section 101 of the 1972 Act). The
Administering Authority is and remains the data controller responsible for
DPA compliance, including for processing carried out by the Local Pension
Board, where processing is carried out as a data controller, or where
personal data use by the Local Pension Board is not carried out for and on
behalf of any other separate legal entity.
8.18 Since the Local Pension Board is not a separate legal entity processing
personal data, it cannot be a data controller itself under the DPA (even to the
extent that the Local Pension Board independently uses personal data of its
Board members, processes information about its relationships with other
individuals and scrutinises records containing personal data of Fund
members from the Administering Authority).
8.19 The Administering Authority must already comply with DPA data protection
principles and must (amongst other requirements):
8.19.1 Notification – notify the DPA regulator, the Information
Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”), of all of the purposes for which
they may be using personal data (including Local Pension Board
purposes) and renew this annually (unless exempt).
8.19.2 Fair and lawful processing – provide privacy notices to
individuals whose personal data is processed (including by the
Local Pension Board) in most but not all cases.
8.19.3 Disclosures – if using data processors (service providers using
personal data on behalf of the Local Pension Board), have an
appropriate written contract in place containing legally required
and ICO recommended provisions to protect personal data.
8.19.4 Transfers – not directly or indirectly ‘export’ personal data to a
country outside the European Economic Area and European
Commission’s ‘white list’ countries unless “adequate safeguards”
have been put in place (such as entering into a data transfer
agreement on the basis of the EU Commission’s model clauses).
8.20 To better comply with the ICO’s expectations and evidence compliance with
data protection principles, it is recommended that (to the extent not yet done)
53
the Administering Authority implement additional measures (also covering
their Local Pension Board and their staff and operations), including:
8.20.1 adopting policies such as a data protection policy, information
security policy, acceptable use (and monitoring) policy and
subject access request policy; and
8.20.2 training on key DPA issues, requirements and policy compliance.
This should form part of the knowledge and understanding
requirements (see paragraph 6.1 for further information).
8.21 Given that the Local Pension Board is not considered a separate legal
entity, the Administering Authority remains the responsible data controller.
Accordingly:
8.21.1 the Administering Authority’s notification registered with the
Information Commissioner should be reviewed and, if necessary
amended to cover proposed personal data processing by the
Local Pension Board (failure to have a current up to date
notification being a criminal offence);
8.21.2 the Local Pension Board and Administering Authority should
liaise to understand the Authority’s requirements and controls
and policies for data protection compliance so that the Local
Pension Board is aware of them and can comply with them
(avoiding duplication and inconsistency of approach) and where
necessary so that appropriate changes can be made to such
requirements, controls and policies before adoption and
implementation by the Local Pension Board;
8.21.3 the Local Pension Board and Administering Authority should be
able to discuss and agree appropriate procedures for dealing
with material data protection compliance issues, such as a
potential security breach.
Freedom of Information
8.22 To be bound by the FOIA a body must be a FOIA public authority.
Administering Authorities are already FOIA public authorities.
8.23 Local Pension Boards are not legal entities in their own right and so cannot
be FOIA public authorities in their own right (and do not meet any of the FOIA
public authority criteria as a Local Pension Board at present). However, Local
54
Pension Boards will be part of that same legal entity as the Administering
Authority, and so the Local Pension Board will already be part of that FOIA
public authority. Accordingly, information records created or obtained by the
Local Pension Board will be accessible from it, or any part of its
Administering Authority under FOIA. The Local Pension Board must liaise
with the Administering Authority to:
8.23.1 understand the Authority’s requirements and controls and
policies for FOIA compliance so that the Local Pension Board is
aware of them and can comply with them (avoiding duplication
and inconsistency of approach) and, where necessary so that
appropriate changes can be made to such requirements, controls
and policies before adoption and implementation by the Local
Pension Board;
8.23.2 agree what details are made available through the Administering
Authority’s publication scheme and so that it can be updated as
necessary;
8.23.3 agree what procedure applies in relation to FOIA information
requests received by the Local Pension Board and / or received
by the Administering Authority about the Local Pension Board to
ensure proper and consistent consultation, action and response
within applicable time limits.
External Reporting - Breaches of Law
8.24 In accordance with section 70 of the 2004 Act, certain individuals must report
to the Regulator as soon as reasonably practicable where that individual has
reasonable cause to believe that:
8.24.1 a duty which is relevant to the administration of the LGPS, and is
imposed by or by virtue of an enactment or rule of law, has not
been or is not being complied with; and
8.24.2 the failure to comply is likely to be of material significance to the
Regulator in the exercise of any of its functions.
8.25 This obligation directly applies to each individual who is a member of the
Local Pension Board. In addition, it also extends to the Administering
Authority, participating employers in the LGPS, any person who is otherwise
involved in the administration of the LGPS, any person who is otherwise
55
involved in advising the Administering Authority and, in some circumstances,
professional advisors of the Administering Authority.
Implementing adequate arrangements
8.26 The Local Pension Board should have effective arrangements in place to
meet its duty to report breaches of law. Please refer to paragraphs 245 to
246 of the Code of Practice as to the procedures that should be established
and operated to ensure that members of the Local Pension Board are able to
meet their legal obligations.
Judging whether a breach must be reported
8.27 The decision whether to report requires two key judgments:
8.27.1 Is there reasonable cause to believe there has been a breach of
law?
8.27.2 If so, is the breach likely to be of material significance to the
Regulator?
8.28 Paragraphs 248 to 262 of the Code of Practice provides guidance as to what
is meant by ‘reasonable cause’ and how to judge whether a breach is likely to
be of ‘material significance’ to the Regulator.
Submitting a report to the Regulator
8.29 Reports must be submitted in writing. Paragraphs 263 to 271 of the Code of
Practice specifies how and the format in which a report should be submitted.
8.30 The requirement to report applies to all those subject to the reporting duty
who become aware of a breach that is likely to be of material significance to
the Regulator; it is not automatically discharged by another party reporting
the breach. However, in practice, where the Local Pension Board considers
there has been a breach it may be appropriate to inform and review this with
the Administering Authority and (where appropriate) the Fund advisor(s) so
that a collective report can be submitted. Details on how such a report should
be submitted can be found in the Regulator's Code of Practice (paragraphs
263 to 271). An exception to this arrangement will apply in cases where there
is a suspicion or dishonesty or other serious wrongdoing by the Administering
Authority and/or the Fund advisor(s).
56
Non-compliance
8.31 Failure to comply with the obligation imposed to report breaches of law
without ‘reasonable excuse’ is a civil offence under section 10 of the
Pensions Act 1995. An individual member of a Local Pension Board could be
fined up to £5,000.
External Reporting - Annual Report
8.32 It would be good practice for the Local Pension Board to consider publishing
an annual report of the Local Pension Board’s activities for that year.
8.33 The Local Pension Board should consider with the Administering Authority
whether it would be appropriate to detail these activities as part of the Fund’s
annual report.
External Reporting - Governance Compliance Statement
8.34 Section 6 of the 2013 Act requires a scheme manager to publish information
about its pension board.
8.35 In terms of the LGPS, this requirement is dealt with under regulation 55 of the
Regulations which requires the Administering Authority to include within its
governance compliance statement details of the terms, structure and
operational procedures relating to its Local Pension Board. This Governance
Compliance Statement must be published by the Administering Authority.
8.36 Current governance compliance statements will need to be revised to include
this new information. The Administering Authority will firstly need to consult
with such persons as it thinks necessary about the revised statement and
then publish it once it has been revised.
External Reporting - The Regulator
8.37 If the Regulator has reasonable grounds to suspect or believe that a member
of a Local Pension Board:
8.37.1 has misappropriated any assets of the Fund or is likely to do so;
or
8.37.2 has a conflict of interest in relation to the investment of assets of
the Fund,
57
the Regulator must report the matter to the Administering Authority. However,
given that a Board member should not have access to Fund assets or be
involved in the investment of Fund assets then the exercise of this duty
should be rare in practice.
Action Points:
An Administering Authority should agree the ongoing reporting arrangements
between the Local Pension Board and the Administering Authority.
A Local Pension Board should understand the Administering Authority’s
requirements, controls and policies for FOIA compliance so that the Local
Pension Board is aware of them and can comply with them.
A Local Pension Board should put in place arrangements to meet the duty of
its members to report breaches of law.
A Local Pension Board should consider (with its Administering Authority) the
need to publish an annual report of its activities.
An Administering Authority should consult on, revise and publish its
governance compliance statement to include details of the terms, structure
and operational procedures relating to its Local Pension Board.
58
9. Resourcing and Funding
Resourcing of Local Pension Boards
9.1 It is appropriate that a Local Pension Board is given adequate resources to
fulfil its task, in the same way that statutory officers of the Administering
Authority and scrutiny committees are entitled.
9.2 As a minimum, the Board will require:
9.2.1 allowances and expenses for Board members (where this has
been agreed and confirmed in the Board's terms of reference);
9.2.2 accommodation and administrative support to conduct its
meetings and other business;
9.2.3 training; and
9.2.4 legal, technical and other professional advice (where required).
9.3 Regulation 106(8) provides that the Board has the power to do anything
which is calculated to facilitate, or is conducive or incidental to, the discharge
of any of its functions. In line with the provisions of this regulation when
determining its budget, consideration will need to be given to whether the
Board requires an allocation for using advisors. Advisors, if used may be
called upon on an adhoc or ongoing basis to assist in areas of technical,
legal or policy matters. Such advisors would not be members of the Local
Pension Board.
9.4 Given the role of a Local Pension Board to assist the Administering Authority
to secure compliance with legal and regulatory matters and to ensure the
effective and efficient governance and administration of the LGPS, the need
for the Local Pension Board to seek its own legal, technical and other
professional advice cannot be discounted.
Funding of Local Pension Boards
9.5 Regulation 106(9) of the Regulations specifies that the expenses of a Local
Pension Board shall be regarded as part of the costs of administration of the
Fund.
9.6 These expenses will include (but are not limited to) the cost of secretarial
support and any necessary advisory support, overheads attaching to the
arranging of meetings and, if the Administering Authority makes provision,
59
payment of allowances and/or expenses to members of the Local Pension
Board (see paragraph 5.34.17).
9.7 The Administering Authority will also need to give early consideration to how
the arrangements for meeting the Local Pension Board’s expenditure will be
administered. The options include:
9.7.1 allocating a budget which is managed by the Local Pension
Board; or
9.7.2 requiring the Local Pension Board to seek approval from the
Administering Authority for expenditure.
9.8 Given the statutory responsibilities of the Local Pension Board and its
relationship with the Administering Authority, it will be a matter for early
consideration by the Local Pension Board as to compiling its budget.
9.9 In considering the budget for a Local Pension Board that budget should also
set out to whom the Local Pension Board will be financially accountable to.
This would be expected to be the Administering Authority (rather than the
Pensions Committee). In addition a timetable for approving the Local
Pension Board's budget should be set out in the Board's terms of reference.
9.10 Consideration should be given by the Administering Authority to whether or
not members of the Local Pension Board are paid allowances or
reimbursed expenses. One option would be to set levels of allowance in a
similar way to the elected members allowances scheme, perhaps with
regard to allowances for co-opted members, and in accordance with
established processes for declaring allowances which have been received
in an open and transparent way. In deciding whether to award an
allowance, and if so how much, the Administering Authority may wish to
consider some or all of the following matters:
whether the Board members are carrying out duties (including
preparation and/or training) during personal time or whether it is
during a period of authorised paid absence,
whether a Board member who has taken on the role of Chair is
carrying out a range of additional responsibilities that merit additional
payment,
60
whether an annual or per meeting allowance is more appropriate,
and how a per meeting allowance should be extended to attendance
at training and
whether employers whose staff sit on a Local Pension Board and
spend work time on Local Pension Board matters wish to reclaim that
cost from the Local Pension Board through allowances/expenses.
61
10. Other possible structures
Combining a Local Pension Board and a Pension Committee
10.1 Where an Administering Authority discharges its pensions functions through
a committee, it can, with the approval of the Secretary of State, appoint the
existing committee as the Local Pension Board.
10.2 Where an Administering Authority chooses to use an existing committee
(subject to the approval of the Secretary of State) careful consideration will
need to be given to the membership of the committee so that it complies
with the requirement in regulation 107 of the Regulations, to designate an
equal number of employer and member representatives and to include at
least two employer and two member representatives. These individuals
must have the capacity to represent members and employers, as
appropriate. Officers or members who have responsibilities for functions
under the Regulations cannot be appointed. It is likely that the employee
representatives will be co-opted members.
10.3 As well as complying with the Regulations, a Local Pension Board which is
established as a local authority Pensions Committee will be subject to
general requirements in the 1972 Act and the 1989 Act. We have
summarised in Schedule C the key legal requirements which need to be
considered where an authority wishes to seek approval from the Secretary
of State to use an existing committee. This is a complex area and any
authority intending to follow this route will need to take legal advice from
their monitoring officer to make sure the plans comply with the different
legal duties and their own Constitution.
10.4 At first sight it might seem attractive to combine the functions of a Local
Pension Board and a Pension Committee to enable the Board to be
included in existing decision making processes, including delegation to
officers and publication of agendas and minutes. However, in practice it
may be difficult to meet the requirements of the 1972 Act, the 1989 Act, the
2013 Act and the Regulations when combining a Local Pension Board and
a local authority Pension Committee.
10.5 Firstly, if the Local Pension Board is to be a Pension Committee this can
only be where written approval has been obtained from the Secretary of
State.
62
10.6 Secretary of State approval may be given subject to such conditions as the
Secretary of State thinks fit and equally may be withdrawn if such conditions
are not met. The Secretary of State may also withdraw approval if in his or
her opinion it is no longer appropriate for the Local Pension Board to be the
Pension Committee.
10.7 Where an Administering Authority has delegated pension functions to more
than one committee and it does not wish to create a separate Local
Pension Board, it will be necessary to determine which of its committees is
most appropriate to undertake the function of the Board.
10.8 It will also be necessary to review the membership of the existing Pension
Committee as regulation 107 of the Regulations says that the Pension
Committee must designate at least two employer and two member
representatives to act as Local Pension Board members.
10.9 If the Local Pension Board is to be a Pension Committee, it is difficult to see
how the Local Pension Board can effectively and objectively fulfil its
statutory function of assisting itself (as the Pensions Committee) to secure
compliance with legal and regulatory matters and to ensure the effective
and efficient governance and administration of the LGPS (which is the
prime responsibility of the Pension Committee).
Joint Pension Boards
10.10 Where the administration and management of a scheme is wholly or mainly
shared by two or more Administering Authorities, those Administering
Authorities may establish a joint local pension board, with the approval of
the Secretary of State.
10.11 In practice there are no current situations which meet the requirement of
regulation 106(3).
10.12 In order to meet the regulation two or more Administering Authorities will
have to demonstrate to the Secretary of State that either the entirety or the
significant elements of the management and administration (including
investments) are formally delegated (with appropriate legal arrangements)
to a single body. For example, this could be best evidenced by the
existence of a joint committee established under section 102 of the 1972
Act which exercises the functions on behalf of constituent authorities.
10.13 In support of the above the Administering Authorities will need to provide
documentary evidence of the existence of and the delegations to the joint
63
committee. Such evidence should also include details of how such a joint
pension board fully represents the members and employers of all the
constituent Administering Authorities as well as the structure of the
reporting lines necessary to ensure that all relevant stakeholders fully aware
of the work of the Joint Pension Board.
10.14 Where the Secretary of State is satisfied by this evidence then approval for
the formation of a Joint Pension Board to cover the functions of the
constituent Administering Authorities may be granted.
10.15 Secretary of State approval may be given subject to such conditions as the
Secretary of State thinks fit and equally may be withdrawn if such conditions
are not met. The Secretary of State may also withdraw approval if in his or
her opinion it is no longer appropriate for the Local Pension Board to be a
Joint Pension Board.
64
11. Other guidance
The Pensions Regulator’s Code of Practice no. 14 Governance and
Administration of public service pension schemes.
http://www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk/public-service-
schemes/regulating-public-service-pension-schemes.aspx
The Pensions Regulator’s website:
www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk
Dedicated Public Service Pension Scheme area on the Pensions
Regulator's website:
www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk/public-service-schemes.aspx
The Pensions Regulator’s Pension Board member toolkit:
www.trusteetoolkit.com/arena/index.dfm
65
SCHEDULE A
Example of a remit of a Local Pension Board
Administering Authorities should remember that the Local Pension Board does not
replace the Administering Authority or make decisions or carry out other duties which
are the responsibility of the Administering Authority.
The first core function of the Board is to assist the Administering Authority in securing
compliance with the Regulations, any other legislation relating to the governance and
administration of the Scheme, and requirements imposed by the Pensions Regulator
in relation to the Scheme. Within this extent of this core function the Board may
determine the areas it wishes to consider including but not restricted to:
a) Review regular compliance monitoring reports which shall include
reports to and decisions made under the Regulations by the Committee.
b) Review management, administrative and governance processes and
procedures in order to ensure they remain compliant with the
Regulations, relevant legislation and in particular the Code of Practice.
c) Review the compliance of scheme employers with their duties under the
Regulations and relevant legislation.
d) Assist with the development of and continually review such
documentation as is required by the Regulations including Governance
Compliance Statement, Funding Strategy Statement and Statement of
Investment Principles.
e) Assist with the development of and continually review scheme member
and employer communications as required by the Regulations and
relevant legislation.
f) Monitor complaints and performance on the administration and
governance of the scheme.
g) Assist with the application of the Internal Dispute Resolution Process.
h) Review the complete and proper exercise of Pensions Ombudsman
cases.
66
i) Review the implementation of revised policies and procedures following
changes to the Scheme.
j) Review the arrangements for the training of Board members and those
elected members and officers with delegated responsibilities for the
management and administration of the Scheme.
k) Review the complete and proper exercise of employer and administering
authority discretions.
l) Review the outcome of internal and external audit reports.
m) Review draft accounts and scheme annual report.
n) Review the compliance of particular cases, projects or process on
request of the Committee.
o) Any other area within the core function (i.e. assisting the Administering
Authority) the Board deems appropriate.
The second core function of the Board is to ensure the effective and efficient
governance and administration of the Scheme. Within this extent of this core function
the Board may determine the areas it wishes to consider including but not restricted
to:
a) Assist with the development of improved customer services.
b) Monitor performance of administration, governance and investments
against key performance targets and indicators.
c) Review the effectiveness of processes for the appointment of advisors
and suppliers to the Administering Authority.
d) Monitor investment costs including custodian and transaction costs.
e) Monitor internal and external audit reports.
f) Review the risk register as it relates to the scheme manger function of
the authority.
g) Assist with the development of improved management, administration
and governance structures and policies.
h) Review the outcome of actuarial reporting and valuations.
67
i) Assist in the development and monitoring of process improvements on
request of Committee.
j) Assist in the development of asset voting and engagement processes
and compliance with the UK Stewardship Code.
k) Any other area within the core function (i.e. ensuring effective and
efficient governance of the Scheme) the Board deems appropriate.
In support of its core functions the Local Pension Board may make a request for
information to Committee with regard to any aspect of the Administering Authority
function. Any such request should be reasonably complied with in both scope and
timing.
In support of its core functions the Local Pension Board may make recommendations
to Committee which should be considered and a response made to the Board on the
outcome within a reasonable period of time.
*Schedule A has been added as an example only - it should not be considered
an exhaustive list and full consideration should be given locally to the remit of
the Local Pension Board.
Schedule B
PART 1
Examples of documents recording policy about the administration of the
scheme (please read in conjunction with paragraphs 6.16 and 6.17)
1. Member booklets, announcements and other key member and
employer communications, which describe the Fund’s policies
and procedures (including any separate AVC guides) including
documents available on the Fund’s website
2. Any relevant policies of the Administering Authority and/or
Pension Committee, for example policies on:
conflicts of interests
record-keeping
data protection and freedom of information
internal dispute resolution procedure
68
reporting breaches
3. The Administering Authority’s governance compliance
statement (as required by regulation 55 of the Regulations)
4. The Administering Authority’s funding strategy statement (as
required by regulation 58 of the Regulations)
5. The Administering Authority’s pension administration statement
(as required by regulation 59 of the Regulations)
6. The Administering Authority’s discretionary policy statement (as
required by regulation 60 of the Regulations)
7. The Administering Authority’s communications policy statement
(as required by regulation 61 of the Regulations)
8. The Administering Authority’s statement of investment
principles (as required by regulation 12 of the Investment
Regulations)
9. The Administering Authority’s internal controls risk register (for
the purposes of section 249B of the 2013 Act)
10. The Fund’s actuarial valuation report and rates and adjustment
certificate (as required by regulation 62 of the Regulations)
11. The Fund’s annual report and accounts (as required by
regulation 57 of the Regulations) including any summary report
(as required by regulation 56 of the Regulations)
12. Any accounting requirements relevant to the Fund
13. Any third party contracts and service level agreements
14. Any internal control report produced by third party service
providers and investment managers
15. The Fund’s standard form of admission agreement and bond
and related policies and guidance
69
PART 2
Examples of knowledge and understanding of the law relating to pensions (please read in conjunction with paragraphs 6.18 and 6.19)
1. Background and Understanding of the Legislative
Framework of the LGPS
Differences between public service pension schemes like the
LGPS and private sector trust-based schemes
Role of the IPSPC and its recommendations
Key provisions of the 2013 Act
The structure of the LGPS and the main bodies involved
including the Responsible Authority, the Administering
Authority, the Scheme Advisory Board, the Local Pension
Board and the LGPS employers
An overview of local authority law and how Administering
Authorities are constituted and operate
LGPS rules overview (including the Regulations, the
Transitional Regulations and the Investment Regulations)
2. General pensions legislation applicable to the LGPS
An overview of wider legislation relevant to the LGPS including:
Automatic Enrolment (Pensions Act 2008)
Contracting out (Pension Schemes Act 1993)
Data protection (Data Protection Act 1998)
Employment legislation including anti-discrimination, equal
treatment, family related leave and redundancy rights
Freedom of Information (Freedom of Information Act 2000)
Pensions sharing on divorce (Welfare Reform and Pensions Act
1999)
Tax (Finance Act 2004)
70
IORP Directive
3. Role and responsibilities of the Local Pension Board
Role of the Local Pension Board
Conduct and conflicts
Reporting of breaches
Knowledge and understanding
Data protection
4. Role and responsibilities of the Administering Authority
Membership and eligibility
Benefits and the payment of benefits
Decisions and discretions
Disclosure of information
Record keeping
Internal controls
Internal dispute resolution
Reporting of breaches
Statements, reports and accounts
5. Funding and Investment
Requirement for triennial and other valuations
Rates and adjustments certificate
Funding strategy statement
Bulk transfers
Permitted investments
71
Restrictions on investments
Statement of investment principles
CIPFA guidance
Appointment of investment managers
Role of the custodian
6. Role and responsibilities of Scheme Employers
Explanation of different types of employers
Additional requirements for admission bodies
Automatic Enrolment
Deduction and payment of contributions
Special contributions
Employer decisions and discretions
Redundancies and restructuring (including the Local
Government (Early Termination of Employment) (Discretionary
Compensation) (England and Wales) Regulations 2006)
TUPE and outsourcing (including Fair Deal and the Best Value
Authorities Staff Transfers (Pensions) Direction 2007)
7. Tax and Contracting Out
Finance Act 2004
Role of HMRC
Registration
Role of ‘scheme administrator’
Tax relief on contributions
Taxation of benefits
72
Annual and lifetime allowances
Member protections
National Insurance
Contracting out (Pensions Scheme Act 1993)
Impact of abolition of contracting out in 2016
VAT and investments
8. Role of advisors and key persons
Officers of the Administering Authority
Fund actuary
Auditor
Lawyers
Investment managers
Custodians
Administrators – in house v. third party
Procurement of services
Contracts with third parties
9. Key Bodies connected to the LGPS
An understanding of the roles and powers of:
Courts
Financial Services Authority
HMRC
Information Commissioner
Pensions Advisory Service
73
Pensions Ombudsman
The Pensions Regulator (including powers in relation to Local
Pension Boards)
74
SCHEDULE C
Summary of Legal Provisions to consider where an Administering Authority
wishes to use an existing pensions committee as its Local Pension Board
If you wish to use your existing pensions committee as the Local Pension Board you
should take legal advice to ensure that the following provisions are complied with:
1. The provisions of Section 101 – Section 107 of the Local Government Act
(the 1972 Act) which provides for the arrangements for the discharge of
functions by local authorities. This enables non-executive functions to be
discharged by a committee, a sub-committee, a joint committee, another
local authority or delegated to officers.
2. Section 102 (3) of the 1972 Act allows for people other than elected
members to be co-opted to a committee. This is not permitted where a
committee is responsible for regulating or controlling the finances of a local
authority.
3. Section 102 (4) allows a local authority to appoint an advisory committee.
4. Section 106 provides for the procedures and quorum of meetings to be
determined in Standing Orders or where provisions are not made in Standing
Orders for the committee to determine its procedures.
5. Section 13 of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 describes the
voting rights for co-opted members of committees and gives rights of voting
to co-opted members in specified circumstances. The general proposition is
that co-opted members do not have voting rights. The provisions in section
13 which make exceptions to this rule are complex and their application will
differ depending on whether functions are discharged by a committee or sub
committee and whether a committee is decision making or advisory. There
are exceptions for advisory committees and also where committees are
established in accordance with regulations under the Superannuation Act
1972 (i.e. co-opted members have voting rights on these committees) and
the Public Service Pensions Act 2013.
6. The provisions of regulation 106 (establishment) and regulation 107
(membership) of the LGPS Regulations 2013 (as amended) relating to Local
Pension Boards.