Local Economic Development as a Prisoners’ Dilemma: The Role of Business Climate by Stephen Ellis...
-
Upload
emery-caldwell -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Local Economic Development as a Prisoners’ Dilemma: The Role of Business Climate by Stephen Ellis...
Local Economic Local Economic Development as a Development as a
Prisoners’ Dilemma:Prisoners’ Dilemma:The Role of Business The Role of Business
ClimateClimate
byby
Stephen Ellis & Cynthia Stephen Ellis & Cynthia RogersRogers
University of OklahomaUniversity of Oklahoma
http://www.ou.edu/cas/econ/http://www.ou.edu/cas/econ/
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
Why do localities Why do localities continue tocontinue to
compete for firms?compete for firms?
Political incentives?Political incentives? Poor cost-benefit Poor cost-benefit
analysis?analysis? Better than doing Better than doing
nothing?nothing? Competition with Competition with
other states?other states?
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
Incentives <=> Pro-business Incentives <=> Pro-business SignalSignal
““You’ve got to have incentives to get You’ve got to have incentives to get your foot in the door” (Carlton, 1996)your foot in the door” (Carlton, 1996)
““North Carolina has one of the North Carolina has one of the strongest economies and one of the strongest economies and one of the best business climates because of … best business climates because of … our aggressive efforts to create and our aggressive efforts to create and keep good jobs” (Governor Jim Hunt, keep good jobs” (Governor Jim Hunt, Lyne, 1998)Lyne, 1998)
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
The Role of Business The Role of Business Climate:Climate:
““It is increasingly difficult to argue that It is increasingly difficult to argue that business climate, however broadly business climate, however broadly
defined, does not influence defined, does not influence interregional firm location” Wasylenko interregional firm location” Wasylenko
(1991)(1991)
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
The Prisoners’ DilemmaThe Prisoners’ Dilemma
Everyone wants to offer incentives Everyone wants to offer incentives BUT if everyone offers incentives, there BUT if everyone offers incentives, there
is nothing to gain by doing sois nothing to gain by doing so Competition escalates the value of Competition escalates the value of
offersoffers
““You can’t say no, but you can’t afford to You can’t say no, but you can’t afford to say yes.” (Stephen Goldsmith, Mayor of say yes.” (Stephen Goldsmith, Mayor of
Indianapolis, Schwartz et. al., 1992)Indianapolis, Schwartz et. al., 1992)
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
Economic Development Economic Development GameGame
Simple ModelSimple Model Single periodSingle period Single firmSingle firm Identical localitiesIdentical localities ““Good” deals onlyGood” deals only
Perfect Planning Perfect Planning WorldWorld
Full disclosureFull disclosure Public Public
accountabilityaccountability Symmetric, perfect Symmetric, perfect
informationinformation Precise cost-Precise cost-
benefit analysisbenefit analysis
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
Distinguishing Features of Distinguishing Features of GameGame
The The PlayersPlayers Equivalent with Equivalent with
regard to firm’s regard to firm’s bottom linebottom line
Players make Players make competing bids, scompeting bids, sii
Maximum bid is Maximum bid is value of attracting value of attracting firm, xfirm, x
Role of Business Role of Business ClimateClimate
Localities incur a Localities incur a cost for failing to cost for failing to attract the firm, cattract the firm, c
Cost depends on Cost depends on difference between difference between high bid (shigh bid (sjj) and ) and locality’s bid, c(slocality’s bid, c(sjj--ssii))
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
Expected PayoffsExpected Payoffs
If offer high bidIf offer high bid
ppii(s) = 1/h(x-s(s) = 1/h(x-sii)-(1-1/h)c(0))-(1-1/h)c(0)
OtherwiseOtherwise
ppii(s) = -c(s(s) = -c(sjj-s-sii))
where h = number of high bidderswhere h = number of high bidders
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
What subsidies will What subsidies will localities offer?localities offer?
Solve through interative dominationSolve through interative domination dominates 0 so rule out 0 bidsdominates 0 so rule out 0 bids ++’ dominates ’ dominates so rule out so rule out bids bids ……(continue pattern)(continue pattern) x is the equilibrium bidx is the equilibrium bid
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
Your payoffs with 2 Your payoffs with 2 localitieslocalities
YOURBID
OPPONENT'S BID
0
0 1/2(x-c(0)) -c()
x- 1/2((x-)-c(0))
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
Your payoffs with 2 Your payoffs with 2 localitieslocalities
YOURBID
OPPONENT'S BID '
1/2((x--c(0)) -c()
' x-(') 1/2((x-(-')-c(0))
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
Upshot of GameUpshot of Game
Localities bid the entire value of Localities bid the entire value of attracting the firm to even have a chance attracting the firm to even have a chance at winningat winning
All localities would do better if none All localities would do better if none offered subsidiesoffered subsidies
If none offered subsidies, each would If none offered subsidies, each would want to offer a small subsidywant to offer a small subsidy
If one firm offers subsidies, they all end If one firm offers subsidies, they all end up bidding highup bidding high
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
Policy ImplicationsPolicy Implications
Failed PoliciesFailed Policies Unilateral moratoriumUnilateral moratorium Voluntary multilateral moratoriumVoluntary multilateral moratorium
Potential PoliciesPotential Policies Voluntary cooperation in repeated Voluntary cooperation in repeated
settingsetting Federally mandated moratoriumFederally mandated moratorium
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
Restraint and Refinement Restraint and Refinement are Consistent Goalsare Consistent Goals
Restraint is warrantedRestraint is warranted Incentives competition is inevitableIncentives competition is inevitable Solutions are difficultSolutions are difficult
Refinement of practice is neededRefinement of practice is needed Protect against bad dealsProtect against bad deals Minimize political distortionsMinimize political distortions
4/7/99 SRSA Meetings
Implications & Future Implications & Future ResearchResearch
Model provides an Model provides an upper boundupper bound on on the benefit to a locality of the benefit to a locality of engaging in incentives competitionengaging in incentives competition
Provides good framework for Provides good framework for extensionsextensions• Formalize dynamics of cost functionFormalize dynamics of cost function• Political economy questionsPolitical economy questions