kerrykleyman.weebly.comkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_sp11.… · llQ...

llQ Results: Course Level Spring 2011 College of Professional Studies

# ltemText

1. Stimulated student thinking

2. Explained course objectives & outcomes

3. Explained course requirements and evaluation crit~ria

4. Presented material in an organized manner

5. Made good use of community resources

6. Spoke clearly and audibly

7. Encouraged questions and treated them respectfully

8. Created a classroom environment conducive to leGirnin~

9. Kept discussion on track

10. Was prepared for sessions with students

11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter

PSYC 336-01 {000767)

Kerry Kleyman

Spring 2011 FY20115

#of Response Options Responses

Always 19

Usually

Sometimes

Always

Usually

Always

Usually

Always

Usually

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Never

Always

Sometimes

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Always

Usually

Sometimes

7

1

22

5

19

8

19

8

13

7

5

2

25

1

22

2

3

20

4

3

15

10

2

19

7

1

22

2

2

12. Was fair and respectful with regard to age, gende , rac¢, ethnicity, religion, Always 23 disabilities, and sexual preference

13. Defined assignments clearly and carefully

Office of Institutional Research F/15/f 011 11:55:55 AM

Usually

Sometimes

Always

Usually

Sometimes

2

2

18

6

3

%of Cum% Resps for Item

70.37% 70.37%

25.93% 96.30%

3. 70% 100.00%

81.48% 81.48%

18.52% 100.00%

70.37% 70.37%

29.63% 100.00%

70.37% 70.37%

29.63% 100.00%

48.15% 48.15%

25.93% 74.07%

18.52% 92.59%

7.41% 100.00%

96.15% 96.15%

3.85% 100.00%

81.48% 81.48%

7.41% 88.89%

11.11% 100.00%

74.07% 74.07%

14.81% 88.89%

11.11% 100.00%

55.56% 55.56%

37.04% 92.59%

7.41% 100.00%

70.37% 70.37%

25.93% 96.30%

3.70% 100.00%

84.62% 84.62%

7 .69% 92.31%

7.69% 100.00%

85.19% 85.19%

7.41% 92.59%

7.41% 100.00%

66.67% 66.67%

22.22% 88.89%

11.11% 100.00%

llQ Results: Course Level Spring 2011 PSYC 336-01 {000767)

College of Professional Studies Kerry Kleyman

Spring 2011 FY20115

#of %of Cum% # Item Text Response Options Responses Resps for Item

14. Provided helpful written responses on student's work Always 20 74.07% 74.07%

Usually 3 11.11% 85.19%

Sometimes 3 11.11% 96.30%

Seldom 1 3.70% 100.00%

15. Informed students of their progress in time to correct deficiencies Always 13 48.15% 48.15%

Usually 8 29.63% 77.78%

Sometimes 3 11.11% 88.89%

Seldom 1 3.70% 92.59%

Never 1 3.70% 96.30%

N/A 1 3.70% 100.00%

16. Facilitated students' active involvement in learning Always 19 73.08% 73.08%

Usually 5 19.23% 92.31%

Sometimes 1 3.85% 96.15%

Never 1 3.85% 100.00%

17. Designed assignments and tests to increase understanding and application Always 18 66.67% 66.67%

Usually 5 18.52% 85.19%

Sometimes 3 11.11% 96.30%

Never 1 3.70% 100.00%

18. Held class as scheduled Always 25 92.59% 92.59%

Usually 2 7.41% 100.00%

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor? Excellent 19 70.37% 70.37%

Very Good 4 14.81% 85.19%

Good 4 14.81% 100.00%

20. How much have you learned in this course? Exceptional Amount 8 29.63% 29.63%

Very Much 14 51.85% 81.48%

Much 4 14.81% 96.30%

Some 1 3.70% 100.00%

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? Yes 25 96.15% 96.15%

No 1 3.85% 100.00%

22. How important was class attendance to understanding the subject? Very 13 48.15% 48.15%

Somewhat 13 48.15% 96.30%

Not Very 1 3.70% 100.00%

23. How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class? 3 or less 8 29.63% 29.63%

4to 6 16 59.26% 88.89%

7to10 3 11.11% 100.00%

Office of Institutional Research 6/15/2011 11:55:56 AM


# ltemText

24. How would you rate the quality of the classroom s~ace?

PSYC 336-01 (000767)

Kerry Kleyman

Spring 2011 FY20115


Very Good 8

Good 5

%of Resps

29.63%

18.52%

Satisfactory 10 37.04%

Unacceptable 4 14.81%

Statistics

[ # J1tem Text J Valid} Meanl SD]

1. lstimulated student thinking o.551

2. I Explained course objectives & outcomes 0.401

3. I Explained course requirements and evaluati9n crit@ria

4. I Presented material in an organized manner I I 5. I Made good use of community resources I I

6. I spoke clearly and audibly I I 1.081 0.391

7.] Encouraged questions and treated them res_B ectfu ly 27 1.30 0.67

8.] Created a classroom environment conducive ~olec; ming 27 1.37 0.69

I 9. I Kept discussion on track 211 1.521 o.641

I 10. lwas prepared for sessions with students

I 11. I Demonstrated mastery of subject matter

12. IWas fair and respectful with regard to age, g nder race, ethnicity, religion, 27 1.22 0.58 disabilities, and sexual preference

13. J Defined assignments clearly and carefully 2111 1.44 0.70

j 14. I Provided helpful written responses on stude~t's wprk 211 1.441 o.851

15. Informed students of their progress in time t p cor~ ect deficiencies

~~ 1.06

16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ~rnin 0.90

17. Designed assignments and tests to increase y nder tanding and application 27 1.56 0.97

18. Held class as scheduled 27 1.07 0.27

19. How would you rate the overall performanc~ of th is instructor? ~44 0.75

I 20. I How much have you learned in this course? I I

I 21. I Did you receive a syllabus by the second me~ting?I j 22. I How important was class attendance to undl}rstarlding the subject? 211 1.561 o.581

23. How many hours per week did you typically pend preparing for class? 27 1.81 0.62

24. How would you rate the quality of the classr porn~ pace? 27 2.37 1.08

Enq of r~ suits for Course ID 000767

Office of Institutional Research 1/15/2 p11 11:55:56 AM

Cum% for Item

29.63%

48.15%

85.19%

100.00%


# ltemText

Office of Institutional Research 6/15/2011 11:55:56 AM

PSYC 336-01 (000767)

Kerry Kleyman

Spring2011FY20115


%of Cum% Resps for Item

Metropolitan a Inst u tional Improvement Questionnaire State University li[~[\{u CJ

Metropolitan State University would like i fo ation and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

2 0 1 1 CD First College -® • ® ® @ Arts & Sciences -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

CD CD • • CD SU ® Management -

• @ @ @ • Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® CV CV CV CV ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

The Instructor:

I• SP

Not Applicable Never

Seldom Sometimes

.• u~u~IIY:· Always

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... • 0 O 6 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ..................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and evaluation criteria ............................... o•OOOO 4. Presented material in an organized man er. . .....................................• 0 0 0 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... e 0 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... • 0 0 O 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them res ectfully ................................ •ooOOO 8. Created a classroom environment conducive to learning. . ........................... e 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . ......... · I· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen~. . ....................................... • 0 .. 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .

and sexual orientation .............. j.......................................... 00000 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefult . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on Stlflden s' work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00000 15. Informed students of their progress in time to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i lea ning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr ase nderstanding and application .............. •ooOOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... • 0 0 0 0 0

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor? e Excellent OVery Good OGood OPoor OVery Poor

20. ow much have you I arned in this course?

Exceptional Amount Very Much Much Some Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes

"" 0 No

----------f·· -j -r·---c= -(~

...l -r· .. -( -( ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. f w many hours per wee

id you typically spend reparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? OVery esomewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

3 or Less 0 11 to 15 t 4 to 6 0 16 or More

I 7 to 10

of the classroom space? OVery Good OGood 0 Satisfactory • Unacceptable

---

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

1 1~ ~o row Vlef <t\ tf.bvt oy the C\U% so UJe were <\Cl! fr b:red,. Trure wefle Cl.. (ot of 1Ateroc.n~~ 0.))\9nmefl\S ~- ocJ-iui\ies ifl ,tl~)~ 1 n\u ~\(fl C\\(h t ~ QWJY)fUJ QJ

w~. \ rttcw1ed o.n e~tro.crd ~ oJYl o..n1 of- lnfrfrrttfir.m . C/as5 t.Uts elljo~o.btJ. tu (6M.Q. fu

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

~m~~t \.or~eo ~o.ss ra:ms: Sb e.o..ch (kUOef\t con Vn,.v'l °" JesK \. ~\)\\\~\Q &ruoents V\(A0 hJ OJ\~te n()ieS en \h-eir ~r· QJ~\tl tflc:

Cffi\' of ~t class th~ VJr.tS LJ{\f,\C0p16..bl.D.. lmyrove f'h{ \fc:W\uloytj· (

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Sy!riems • www.sm-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropolitan 9 Inst u tional Improvement Questionnaire State University ~

Metropolitan State University would like i fo ation and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are a ny


---------2 • Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

0 1 1 ~ CD First College -® • ® ® @ Arts & Sciences -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use Vs or Xs to mark choices.



© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® -SP -® ® ® ® -CV CV CV CV -® ® ® ® -® ® ® ® --Not Applicable -

Never -,.---'~~~~~~~

Selclom -.----'~~~~~~---...,

Sometimes

The Instructor:

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... • Q O 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. • 0 0 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ...................................... 0 • 0 0 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... 0 Q cl) 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... CU 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ eQOOOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... fib 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ 0 • 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................................... 0 • 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... 0 0 <O 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , gender, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, ..

and sexual orientation ....................................................... o•oooo 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful!. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 () 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on st dens' work ................................ 600000 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 • 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement ir lea ning. . ................................ 0 0 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to incre se nderstanding and application. . ............ 0 0 0 0 0 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

0 Excellent 9Very Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? OYes <0No

-_r: ... -c~

....!.

-r--.:: _c ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week


24. How would you rate the quality -

for understanding the subject? •very 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

3 or Less 0 11 to 15 4 to 6 0 16 or More 7 to 10

of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -•Satisfactory -0 Unacceptable @R -




·- Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.


Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropolitan Ill Instl tional Improvement Questionnaire State University ~

Metropolitan State University would like i fo ation and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are a n



2 0 1 1 ~ CD First College -® • ® ® @ Arts & Sciences -


CD CD • • CD SU ® Management -• @ @ @ e Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® • SP ® ® ® ® CV CV CV CV ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®


Seldom: Sometimes

The Instructor: Always

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... 0-0 0 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... • 0 O 0 O O 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . .............................. e 0 0 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. . ..................................... 0 • 0 O 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... 0 0 0 0 • 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................... , . • 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully. . .............................. e 0 0 0 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... • 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... 0 • 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student ................................. , ...... o•oooo 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter. . ........................................ • 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , ge der, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! .......................................... •OOOOO 14. Provided helpful written responses on s1den 'work ................................ eOOOOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 • 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i lea ning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to incre se nderstanding and application .............. eOOQOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0


0 Excellent •very Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? <6Yes ONo

-----------;~ -r ...!.

-r---i::. _i::. ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week


24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? •very ()Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


of the classroom space? OVery Good OGood 0 Satisfactory e Unacceptable

--




~ c~;~--oorn ~C12-




Metropol_it~ a Inst u tional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty ~mmm ---Metropolitan State University would like i o tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be

used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n --Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.


• Answer questions on both sides.

,/---------,,:--

•

The Instructor:

' -

-

2 0 1 ® • ® CD CD • • ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J)

® ® ® ® ® ®

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... . 2. Explained course objectives and outcomrs. . ...................... . 3. Explained course requirements and evalpatio criteria. . ............. . 4. Presented material in an organized man er. . .................... . 5. Made good use of community resources ......................... .

1 5" CD First College -® ® Arts & Sciences -

• CD SU ® Management -® ~ Prof. Studies -® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -® ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® • SP -® -(J) -® -® --l Not Applicable

l Never --l Seldom

l Sometimes

l ~~l!stially [ Always

--r·--· _,,

............... • 0 0 0 0 0

............... • 0 0 0 0 0

............... • 0 0 0 0 0

............... • 0 0 0 0 0

-..--;;: --;

_l.

-r·-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Q 0 0 0 0 -c

6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 0 0 0 0 0 _c 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................ . ............... • 0 0 0 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........... . ............... • 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................... . ............... • 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................... . ............... • 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter. . ........................ . ............... • 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , ge der, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................... . ............... • 0 0 0 0 0 ............... • 0 0 0 0 0 ............... • Q 0 0 0 0 ............... • 0 0 0 0 0 ............... • 0 0 0 0 0

13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu~I . .. ...................... . 14. Provided helpful written responses on st dent ' work. . .............. . 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . .... . 16. Facilitated students' active involvement im lea ning. . ................ . 17. Designed assignments and tests to incre se nderstanding and applicatio n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 0 0 0 0 0 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................... .

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor? ~Excellent

OVeryGood OGood OPoor OVery Poor



.... ?- .••....•.. • 0 0 0 0 0

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? -'OYes ONo

----------------------22. How important was class attendance 3. ow many hours per week id you typically spend reparing for class?


for understanding the subject? •very 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


of the classroom space? •Very Good OGood O Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---

Metropolitan 9 Instl u tional Improvement Questionnaire State University ~

Metropolitan State University would like i fo ation and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the curri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are a on



2 0 1 1 CD First College -®®®®®® CD CD CD CD CD CD @@@@@@ ®®®®®® ©©©©©© ®®®®®® ®®®®®® (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J)

® • ® ® @ Arts & Sciences -• Fill response ovals completely - do

not use ti's or Xs to mark choices. CD CD • • CD SU ® Management -

• @ @ @ © Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -

The Instructor:

®®®®®® ®®®®®®

® ® (J)

® ®

® ® ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J)

® ® ® ® ® ®

® SP


Seldom Sometimes

·l.[su~y.

Always

1. Stimulated student thinking ..................................................... 0 •o 0 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eva

1uati n criteria. . ............................. • () 0 0 0 0

4. Presented material in an organized madnner. ...................................... 0 •· .. ··. 0 0. 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... 0 • 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ •ooOOO 8. Created a classroom environment condJcive to learning. . ........................... • () 0 0. .. 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track ...................................................... o•OOOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . ....................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter

1 ............................•...•....•... 8 0 .. 0 0 0 0

12. Was fair and respectful with regard to age, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, . and sexual orientation. . ............ J .......................................... • () 0 0 0 0

13. Defined assignments clearly and carefull~. . ....................................... 0 .. 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on stl!Jden s' work. . .............................. • 0 0 0 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i leaning .................................. OltOOOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr ase nderstanding and application .............. 0.0000 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00000

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor? ,,//I Excellent OVeryGood OGood OPoor OVery Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo

-----------i" -· -w -r· .. -_j r· .. -.:: -c ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week



for understanding the subject? OVery •somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


of the classroom space? •Very Good OGood 0 Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---

Metropol.itan 0 Instlu tional Improvement Questionnaire State Umvers1ty till'WtC[cj

Metropolitan State University would like i fo ation and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are a ny


CD First College • Please use pencil or blue/black ink.



The Instructor:

2 0 ® • CD CD

• @

® ® © © ® ® ® ® (j) (j)

® ® ® ®

1 1 ® ®

• • @ @

® ® © © ® ® ® ® (j) (j)

® ® ® ®

CD SU

® FA

~ SP

@ Arts & Sciences ® Management lllJ Prof. Studies ~ Nursing & Hlth. Sci. ® Law Enf./Crim. Just.


~eldom

Sometimes

Always ,

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... CD>() 0 0 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... fit) Q 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. 9 0 0 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. . ..................................... • C) 0 0 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... • () 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 9 Q 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them respectfully ................................ 6QOOOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive to learning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tt 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track ..................................................... 0.0000

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................................... '1q0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... • Q 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a~, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, i. .

and sexual orientation. . ...................................................... 910 0 0 0 0 13. Defi~ed assignmen~s clearly and careful! ....

1

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •o.·.1 0000 14. Provided helpful written responses on st den 1s work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 O 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement ir lea ning. . ................................ 9 O 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to increase nderstanding and application .............. •ooOOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0


WI Excellent OVery Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor



'·

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? OYes ONo

-------------------------_r·-

-~ --•) -r·-

-~ -c -s:: ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week 24. How would you rate the quality -

for understanding the subject? OVery esomewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


3 or Less 0 11 to 15 4 to 6 0 16 or More ·7 to 10

of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -8 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -

Metropofaan 9 Instl tional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty [icccccu(J ---Metropolitan State University would like i fo ation and opinions about this course. Your responses will be

used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are a n




The Instructor:

•••@@® CDCD CDCD CDCD ®®®®®® ~®®®®® 4©©©©© s®®®®® 6@@@•@ 7 cvcv•cv• s®®®®® 9®®®®®

Fiscal Year/Tr

2 0 1 1 ~ ® • ® ® CD CD • • CD SU

• ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® FA © © © © ® ® ® ® • SP ® ® ® ® CV CV CV CV ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

--Course College/ School -CD First College -® Arts & Sciences -® Management -• Prof. Studies -® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -

Not Applicable

Never

Seldom Sometimes

Always

--------1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... • Q O O O O

2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... • 6 O Q O O _r·-i·-

3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. • O 0 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. . ..................................... e (j 0 0 0 0

-J 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... eo 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them respectfully ................................ 0.0000 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive to learning ............................. eOOOOO 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ 0 • 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... • O 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, ... · .

and sexual orientation ........................................................ •ooOOO 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! ......................................... 0.0000 14. Provided helpful written responses on st dens' work ................................ •OOOOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement ip lea ning. . ................................ e 0 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to increase nderstanding and application .............. •OOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00000


•Excellent OVery Good OGood OPoor OVery Poor




-r·--c _c ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week


24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? •very 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

3 or Less O 11 to 15 4 to 6 0 16 or More 7 to 10

of the classroom space? -•veryGood -OGood -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -



Cowv~..e 1,01t.,S i ~res:11·~ 0t-Lot .f~n, ~'") i;;>tts r,.,~I\ VtVfccl r n ~ Svbj-ccA-





Metropolitan I Inst u tional Improvement Questionnaire State University rrmuilu

Metropolitan State University would like i o ation and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n



2 0 1 1 [S_ CD First College -



The Instructor:

~Ii>®®® 1 CDCDCDCDCD 2®®®®® 3@®®®® 4@©©©© s®®®®® 6@@®~®

7 cvcv•cv~ s@®®®® 9®®®®®

® CD

• ® © ® ® CV ® ®

• ® CD • ® ® ® ® © © ® ® ® ® CV CV ® ® ® ®

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . ......................... . 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s ........................ . 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............. . 4. Presented material in an organized man 5. Made good use of community resources ......................... .

® ® Arts & Sciences -

• CD SU ® Management -® ~ Prof. Studies -® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ~ SP ® CV ® ®

l Not Applicable

l Never

l ~ S~Idom

l Sometimes

l~ ~~ .. Usually [ Always

............... • 0 0 0 0 0

............... • 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 0 0 0 0 0 ............... • 0 0 0 0 0 ............... • 0 0 0 0 0

------------.l _r·-

.1 -,._ i _,::

-1:: 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................ . ............... • 0 0 0 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........... . ............... Q) 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................ . ............... • 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................... . ............... ~ 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................... . ............... ~ 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , ge der, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................ . ............... • 0 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! .......................... . ............... ~ 0 0 0 0 0

............... • 0 0 0 0 0 ............... lil 0 0 () 0 0 ............... • 0 0 0 0 0

14. Provided helpful written responses on st~den ' work. . .............. . 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . .... . 16. Facilitated students' active involvement irn lea ning. . ................ . 17. Designed assignments and tests to incre se nderstanding and application ............. . , 0 0 0 0 0 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................... .


•Excellent OVeryGood OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor



............... • 0 0 0 0 0

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? 6lYes ONo

----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week id you typically spend reparing for class?


for understanding the subject? OVery •Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

3 or Less 0 11 to 15 4 to 6 0 16 or More

· 7 to 10

of the classroom space? •Very Good OGood 0 Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---






Printed in USA • OMR Survey Systems • www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropolitan a Instt tional Improvement Questionnaire State University luuillrn ---Metropolitan State University would like i o ti on and opinions about this course. Your responses will be

used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n --Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do

not use Vs or Xs to mark choices.


•

The Instructor:

2 ® CD

• ® © ® ® CV ® ®

0 1

• ® CD • @ @

® ® © © ® ® ® ® CV CV ® ® ® ®

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . ......................... . 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................... . 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............. . 4. Presented material in an organized man 5. Made good use of community resources ......................... . 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................... . 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................ . 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........... . 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................ .

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................... . 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................... .

12. ':n~s::;u~~~~:~~=t~:~.1 ~i.t~ _r~~~~~ ~~ ~~F: ~~~~~~·.r~.c~: ~~~~i~i.t~,-~e.li~'.~~· 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful!~. . ....................... . 14. Provided helpful written responses on stUJden s' work ................ . 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . .... . 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in lea ning. . ................ .

1 5 CD First College -® @ Arts & Sciences -

• CD SU ® Management -@ e Prof. Studies -® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® • SP -® -CV -® -® --l Not Applicable

l Never

l ~

.Seldom

---l Sometimes

~··.·.·:::::: ;:lJ~u~Y.> I [ Always I

-.. • 0 0 0 0 0 -.. 0 • 0 0 0 0 -l_f . . 0 • 0 0 0 0 -r·-

• () 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0

•• 0 0 0 0 0

-.l r·--i:: -<: • 0 0 0 0 0 -• 0 0 0 0 0 -• () 0 0 0 0 -.. • 0 0 0 0 0 -• 0 0 0 0 0 -disabilities, -• 0 0 0 0 0 -0 • 0 0 0 0 -0 0 • 0 0 0 -.. 0 0 0 0 0 • -.o • 0 0 0 0 -17. Designed assignments and tests to incre se nderstanding and application 0 • 0 0 0 0 -18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................... .

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor? O Excellent OVery Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor

22. How important was class attendance for understanding the subject?

OVery OSomewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All



23. ow many hours per week id you typically spend reparing for class?


.. •• 0 0 0 0 0

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? 8Yes ONo

----------24. How would you rate the quality -of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -e Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -



S'v&., tPClS f\~, ~Mo a0d f11NbW cks~J\~GV\ ".::( (QoJned

a_ let~


s~"*"~j ~ -K\-:: :f' ~t\+ -ta\<Q.. ~\A&,~ (\04.es

b~cOJ-lJ~~ ~ (b~ p.x.N\_~ ~ ~ ~~\r\ pr~ ~+.




Inst u tional Improvement Questionnaire -

Metropolitan State University would like i o ti on and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n


--------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

2 0 1 1 r~ CD First College -••@@®

1 CDCDCDCDCD 2@@@@@


not use V's or Xs to mark choices. CD CD • • CD s u ® Management -

• @ @ @ • Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both si~es. 3@®®®®

4©©©©© s®®®®® 6@@®•®

® ® ® ® ®F A ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -

•

The Instructor:

7 CVCV CV s®®®®® 9®®®®®

® ® CV ® ®

® ® ® ® CV CV ® ® ® ®

® ~s p ® CV ® ®


Seldom Sometimes

. · JJsually Always

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 Q 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. e 0 0 Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ...................................... eOOOOO 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... eOOOOO 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... • 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ • 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................................... 0 • 0 Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , gender, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, . . ..

and sexual orientation ....................................................... 000000 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful!. . . ....................................... 8 Q 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on st~den s' work ................................ eQOOOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 • 0 () 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in lea ning. . ................................ IM 0 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to incre se nderstanding and application .............. • 0 0 0 0 0 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... 8 0 0 0 0 0





21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves ONo

----------r· ... -·· _;:: I --:r

_r-~

-r:: --:: -1:: ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week


24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

9Very 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

3 or Less 0 11 to 15 4to6 016orMore 7 to 10

of the classroom space? OVery Good eGood O Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---


~

~~~~2k ~/ /J7;U2_ ~ Z--~ 11//V ~ t-V4L ~ ~ . ---

~ ~F/~.tf~µ~-





Metropolitan D Instl tional Improvement Questionnaire State University ~ ---Metropolitan State University would like i fo ation and opinions about this course. Your responses will be

used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are a on --Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -




The Instructor:

•••@@® CD CD CD CD CD CD @@@@@@ ®®®®®® ®®®®®® ®®®®®® ®®®®•@ 7CVCVecve s@®®®® 9@®®®®

2 ® CD

• ® ® ® ® CV ® ®

0 1

• ® CD • @ @ ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® CV CV ® ® ® ®

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................... . 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................... . 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............. . 4. Presented material in an organized man er. . ..................... . 5. Made good use of community resources ......................... . 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................... . 7. Encouraged questions and treated them res~ectfully. . .............. . 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive to learning. . ........... . 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................ .

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................... . 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................... .

12. :,~s ::;u~~~~:~~=t~:~.1 ~i-t~ _r~~~~~ ~~ ~~r: ~. ~~~~·. r~~~: ~~~~i~i.t~ •. ~e.li~'.~~· 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful!~; ........................ .

15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . .... . 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i lea ning. . ................ .

1 bJ CD First College -® @ Arts & Sciences -

• CD SU ® Management -@ e Prof. Studies -® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -® ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® • SP -® -CV -® -® ----l Not Applicable

l Never

J .. ~ Seldom ---j·· -J

j"· -l Sometimes

L.i:£;:., ... -~c· .lJsually ..

l Always I·

• b 0 0 0 0

• 0 0 0 0 0 . . • 0 0 0 0 0

-c:i· -r·-

• () 0 0 0 0

• b 0 0 0 0 .. •• 0 0 0 0 0

-J j'•

-c -1:: • 0 0 0 0 0 -• 0 0 0 0 0 -0 • 0 0 0 0 -.. • 0 0 0 0 0 -• () 0 0 0 0 -disabilities, -• 0 0 0 0 0 -.. . . • 0 0 0 0 0 -• 0 0 0 0 0 -• 6 0 0 0 0 -•• 0 0 0 0 0 -n. .. • 0 0 0 0 0

14. Provided helpful written responses on sJden s' work. . .............. .

17. Designed assignments and tests to increase nderstanding and applicatio -18. Held class as scheduled ....................................... .

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor? e Excellent OVery Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor

22. How important was class attendance for understanding the subject? •very 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All




3 or Less 0 11 to 15 4 to 6 0 16 or More f 7to10

.. .0 l• 0 0 0 0


----------24. How would you rate the quality -of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -• Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -



s~ 1~ \lQf~ fDn~y <\-, re\Qte'.) t~\W +0 . \e.,Q\ WO'(\c\ S\~of\O'()S, 1 lA.\VJ:l_'jS ~~ W c\~s 'o~c°'-u~ Q~ \s m~ -Povvon~c t~~/





Metropolitan 0 Instt tional Improvement Questionnaire State University [j[[['c'c-m1

Metropolitan State University would like i o ation and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an ny

Fiscal Year/Tr CO''"";e College/ School


0 1 1 '.S =irst College -® • ® ® lif-Arts & Sciences -




© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® • SP -• ® ® ® ® -(J) (J) (J) (J) -® ® ® ® -® ® ® ® --Not Applicable -

Never -,.--'-------, Seldom -

~~------,

Sometimes

The Instructor:

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ . 2. Explained course objectives and outcomes. . ...................................... 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. 0 • 0 Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b 0 0 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... 0 0 • 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... ~ 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ •OOOOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... 0 0 9> Q 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ 0 • 0 Q 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student ........................................ •OOQOO 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... 6 Q 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .. .

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ e 0 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful!, . . ....................................... 0 0 e 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on st~den s' work ................................ •()OQOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 • 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement ir lea ning. . ................................ 0 • 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to increase nderstanding and application .............. 00fti000 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... <l}QOOOO


O Excellent OVeryGood OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor




-_r·~ -~ --~··. _r-

-~ -c -·:: ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week



·-Very 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -8.Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -




Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions. Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• vvww.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropolitan ~ I Instl tional Improvement Questionnaire State University [j[[[['ccrn

Metropolitan State University would like i o ti on and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n


• Fill response ovals completely - do not use ti's or Xs to mark choices.


•

The Instructor:

0 I 00®®®

1 CDCDCDCDCD 2@@@@@

3@@®®® 4®®®®® s®®®®® 6@@®f>® 7 (J) (J) (J) •

s®®®®® 9®®®®®

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School v~ 2 0 1 1

® • ® ® CD CD • • • @ @ @

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J) (J)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

CD

®

®

CD First College @ Arts & Sciences

SU ® Management e Prof. Studies

FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci.

SP ® Law Enf./Crim. Just.


Seldom Sometimes

· .Usi111lly Always

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 8 0 0 0 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... 9 0 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. e 0 0 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man 0 0 0 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully. . .............................. 8 0 0 0 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... O> 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... 8 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter. . ........................................ 0 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , ge der, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, ..

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ G 0 0 b 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 9 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s11 den ' work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies ...................... 000000 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i lea ning. . ................................ OJ 0 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to incre se nderstanding and application. . ............ 0 0 0 0 0 0 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... ~00000


8Excellent OVery Good OGood OPoor OVery Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? @PYes ONo

--------------------------r·--

r _,. -j·-

-<:"' -r·--.1 -r·--i:~ ::_ ----------------------22. How important was class attendance

for understanding the subject? every


24. How would you rate the quality -of the classroom space? -

0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


0 Very Good _r() OGood v~ 8 Satisfactory ,,, ~ 0 Unacceptable ~R -

---






Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• vvww.snr-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropolitan 1)1 Instlu tional Improvement Questionnaire State University tITIW{ffii

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n





The Instructor:

2 ® CD

• ® © ® ® CV ® ®

0 1 • ® CD • @ @

® ® © © ® ® ® ® CV CV ® ® ® ®

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... . 2. Explained course objectives and outcomes. . ...................... . 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............. . 4. Presented material in an organized man er. . ..................... . 5. Made good use of community resources ......................... .

1 CD First College ® @ Arts & Sciences

• CD SU ® Management @ © Prof. Studies ® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ® ® SP ® CV ® ®

l Not Applicable

l Never

l Seldom

l Sometimes

~iUsuall~ [ Always

............... 0 • 0 0 0 0

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 • 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 • 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 • 0 0 0 0 ............... 0 0 0 Q • 0

6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................ . ............... 0 0 • 0 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning ............. . ............... 0 • 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................ . ............... 0 • ('.) 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................... . ............... 0 • 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................... . ............... 0 0 • 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , gender, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................ . ............... 0 0 • 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! . . ....................... . 14. Provided helpful written responses on s1den s' work. . .............. . 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . .... .

............... 0 6 • 0 0 0

............... 0 0 0 • 0 0 ............... 0 0 0 • 0 0 ............... 0 0 0 0 • 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement ii leaning .................. .

17. Designed assignments and tests to incre se nderstanding and application ............. 0 0 0 0 • 0 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................... .


0 Excellent OVery Good •Good OPoor 0 Very Poor


Exceptional Amount Very Much

··Much Some Little

............... • 0 0 0 0 0

21 . Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •ves ONo

-------------------------r·-· -f---t:: _r·-

r -r:: -,.-, ·-· ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week id you typically spend reparing for class?


OVery O Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


of the classroom space? OVery Good OGood O Satisfactory •Unacceptable

---



-::f. Co u,~ fV\.JV., -U'CJJ.___




Printed in USA • OMR Survey Systems • \VWw.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropol_itan mlil Inst lu tional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty M





The Instructor:

••@@® 1 CDCDCDCDCD 2@@@@@

3@@®®® 4©©©©© s®®®®® 6@@®•® 700•0• s®®®®® 9®®®®®


2 0 1 1 ® • ® ® CD CD • • • @ @ @

® ® ® ® © © © © ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® 0 0 0 0 ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

'5 CD

®

•

CD First College @ Arts & Sciences

SU ® Management • Prof. Studies




Seldom Sometimes

Always .

1. Stimulated student thinking .................................................... eQOOOO 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... e 0 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. e 6 0 6 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ...................................... • b 0 6 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... 0 •<fi 0 () 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly .................................................... •60000 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ •OOOOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... 9 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ e 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... e 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , gender, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00000 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefull . . ....................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on st~den ' work. . .............................. e 0 0 0 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . .................... e 0 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement ir lea ning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to increase nderstanding and application .............. 000000 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... • 0 0 0 0 0

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor? e Excellent OVery Good OGood OPoor OVery Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •ves ONo

---------------------------o· -J:

_I -j·-

-a:: -1::: ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week



t/l)Very 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -•Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -



s:·


: &fkr UWJ]/CJ vJ5 Uf12 ~


Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• \1/Ww.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropolitan '· I lnstl tional Improvement Questionnaire State University ([[[['cc-uu ---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be

used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an ny ous. --Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -


not use ti's or Xs to mark choices.


•

2 0 ® • CD CD

• @

® ® © © ® ® ® ® 0 0 ® ® ® ®

1 1 ® ®

• • @ @

® ® © © ® ® ® ® 0 0 ® ® ® ®

ol CD First College -@ Arts & Sciences -

CD SU ® Management -• Prof. Studies -

® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -

l<Gi SP ------l Not Applicable

l Never --l ~ Seldom -Sometimes

The Instructor: l

kc··'._::·.· ... JJsually I [

-j·-

-.J Always

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . ......................... . 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0

2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................... . 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............. .

0 • 0 .. 0 0 • .o 0 • 0 0 • 0 0 • 0 • 0

4. Presented material in ah organized man er. . ..................... . 5. Made good use of comrunity resources ......................... . 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... . 7. Encouraged questions ~nd treated them resp ctfully ................ . 8. Created a classroom e~vironment cond cive o learning. . ........... . 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................ .

• 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery pf subject matter ......................... . • 0 0

I

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

-r·---~i _, .....

·-r--s:: _,:: -----10. Was prepared for sessi~ms with student~ . . . .................... .

12. Was fair and respectful ~ith regard to ag , g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, -and sexual orientation. 1 ••••••••••••• L ......................... . 13. Defined assignments cl~arly and carefullt. . ....................... . 14. Provided helpful writteniresponses on sJden s' work ................ . 15. Informed students of th1fir progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . .... . 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i lea ning. . ................ . 17. Designed assignments knd tests to incr ase nderstanding and application

I

18. Held class as schedule~. . ..................................... .

19. How would you rate theloverall 20. ow much have you performance of this instructor? I arned in this course?

0 Excellent Exceptional Amount 0 Very Good Very Much •Good Much 0 Poor Some 0 Very Poor Little

22. How important was class attendance for understanding the sJbject?

every I

O Somewhat I

0 Not Very 0 Not at All


3 or Less 0 11 to 15 4to6 016orMore 7 to 10

0 • 0 0 0 0 .. 0 ~ 0 0 0 0

.. • 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 d 0 0

-~ 0 0 0 0 0 @> 6 0 0 0 0

.. -~ 0 0 0 0 0

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? @Yes ONo

----------------24. How would you rate the quality -of the classroom space? OVery Good ~Good

O Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---



J / 1kQd -tf!l{tf SN N't)

t1bcvtf· ~1 s]!u vJtllJ

'S)'\.Q (t¥1{{e, 1111riq5 -fr;r\


1h1-. s11d.aa ~ ~ st}1lt ~ drsfRac-fln& !A)hl If Ir Siff/f rL(}.




Metropol_itan 0 Instl tional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty ~mmrn ---Metropolitan State University would like i o tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be

used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an ny --Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -




•

The Instructor:

••@@® 1 CDCDCDCDCD 2@@®®® 3@®®®® 4@©©©© s®®®®® 6@@@•@ 7 cvcv•cv• s@®®®® 9@®®®®

2 ® CD

• ® © ® ® CV ® ®

0 1

• ® CD • ® ® ® ® © © ® ® ® ® CV CV ® ® ® ®

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . ......................... . 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................... . 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............. . 4. Presented material in an organized man 5. Made good use of community resources ......................... . 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................... . 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................ . 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........... . 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................ .

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................... . 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................... . 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , gender, race, ethnicity, religion,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................ . 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefulL . . ....................... . 14. Provided helpful written responses on s~den 'work ................ . 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . .... .

1 r,? CD First College -® ® Arts & Sciences -

• CD SU ® Management -® e Prof. Studies -® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® • SP -® -CV -® -® ----l r


I · .. Seldom

r Sometimes

L>· u ;.. . , . .. usllal':}'. f Always I

.o • 0 0 .. •• 0 0 b .. • 0 0 0

• 0 0 0 . . 0 • 0 0

•• 0 0 0

• 0 0 0

• 0 0 0

• 0 0 0

• 0 0 0 .. • 0 0 0

disabilities, .. • 0 0 0

.. • 0 0 0 .. • 0 0 0

• 0 0 0

•• 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

--,._ -·. ...!. -; ...!.

-r---c _:::: -----------16. Facilitated students' active involvement ii leaning .................. .

17. Designed assignments and tests to increase nderstanding and application •• 0 0 0 0 0 -18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................... .


O> Excellent OVery Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor

22. How important was class attendance for understanding the subject? •very 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All




3 or Less 0 11 to 15 4 to 6 0 16 or More 7to10

.. •• 0 0 0 0 0


----------24. How would you rate the quality -of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -9Good -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -




f ,t11fti(}!,.{tf.4.pJf,-·\t.,j



Printed in USA • OMR Survey Systems • \:liww.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropol.it~ ~ Inst 1uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty M






The Instructor:

2 ® CD

• @

© ® ® <J)

® ®

0 1

• ® CD • ® ® @ @

© © ® ® ® ® <J) <J)

® ® ® ®

1 CD First College ® ® Arts & Sciences

• CD SU @ Management ® © Prof. Studies @ @ FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ® ® SP ® <J)

® ®


Seldom Sometimes

Always

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... e 0 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 () 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ...................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... 0 0 • 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... eo 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ •ooOOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ • 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... • 0 0 b 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . ............ l- ......................................... e 0 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful!~. . ....................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on st~den s' work ................................ •OOQOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O •.· 0 O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement.~r. lea ning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 O 17. Designed assignments and tests to increase nderstanding and application .............. eOOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0


•Excellent OVery Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor




--------------------------r·--.l -r·--_r -_r -.l -r·--,:~

=:_, ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week id you typically spend reparing for class?


for understanding the subject? OVery esomewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


of the classroom space? every Good OGood O Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---



\\\WC{ t\<\O C~OS)t~LD\Y'\ BnvjP(-n~1'JL~ v· fiJw t~· \f\r), ')< c,.r· LP c ·{1.J re r:/ c ll1]:J o (XTvrh ey





Metropolitan '!'i InsJuctional Improvement Questionnaire State University [i!c-mm1

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an ny ous.



2 0 1 1 5 CD First College -••@@®

1 CDCDCDCDCD 2@@@@@


not use V's or Xs to mark choices. CD CD • • CD SU ® Management -

• @ @ @ © Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. 3@@®®®

4@©©©© s®®®®® 6@@@•@ 1 cvcv•cv• s@®®®® 9@®®®®

® ® ® ® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® • SP -® ® ® ® -CV CV CV CV -® ® ® ® -® ® ® ® --Not Applicable -

The Instructor:

·.• ..... _. Never

Seldom Sometimes

U~ually

Always

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 9 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. • () 0 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ...................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... e 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ •OOOOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... e 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student ........................................ eOOOOO 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , gender, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ • 0 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! .......................................... eOOOOO 14. Provided helpful written responses on stUJden s' work. . .............................. 0 0 • 0 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to rrect deficiencies. . .................... • 0 0 O 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement_~r leaning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00000 17. Designed assignments and tests to increase nderstanding and application .............. • 0 0 0 0 0 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... • 0 0 0 0 0


•Excellent OVeryGood OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor




---··! -.J -r·--.: -ii .l -· ...i.

-r·--·:: -t::. ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week





of the classroom space? •VeryGood OGood O Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---




• ..




Metropolitan D Instlctional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty mmurn

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri u1um, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an ny ous.


[_ • Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use tis or Xs to mark choices.


The Instructor:

2 ® CD

• ® © ® @

CV ® ®

0 1 • ® CD • ® ® ® ® © © ® ® @ @

CV CV ® ® ® ®

1 CD First College ® ® Arts & Sciences

• CD SU ® Management ® e Prof. Studies ® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ® ® SP @

CV ® ®


Seldom Sometimes

Always

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 Q 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. e Q 0 Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ...................................... e Q 0 0 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... e 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ •OOQOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... • Q 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track ..................................................... •OOOOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................................... • .O 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , gender, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ • 0 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on stl!lden s' work. . .............................. e 0 0 Q 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . () 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i I lea ning. . ................................ @ 0 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to incre se nderstanding and application. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00000 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0


•Excellent OVery Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor



21. Pid you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? '•Yes 10No

--------------------------r·--.1 r·---:r -.l

r -...!. i·-i

-c -,::: ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week



for understanding the subject? every 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


of the classroom space? OVeryGood OGood • Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---

Metropolitan a Inst 1UCtional Improvement Questionnaire State University ~1~-1'c';rrn

Metropolitan State University would Hke in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an ny ous.


---------2 0 • Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

1 1 CD First College -® • ® ® @ Arts & Sciences -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use tis or Xs to mark choices.



© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ®

• ® ® ® (j) (j) (j)

® ® ® ® ® ®

The Instructor:

® • SP ® (j)

® ®


Seldom Sometimes

.,Usually Always

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 0 0 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... 0 .. 0 Q 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria ............................... 0 ~O 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. . ..................................... 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... 0 · 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... ~ 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ 0 0 0 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... 0 Q 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................................... 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , gender, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefull. . . ....................................... 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on sJden s' work ................................ 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i lea ning. . ................................ 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to increase nderstanding and application .............. 0 0 0 0 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... 0~0000


0 Excellent OVery Good <I/I Good OPoor 0 Very Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? f#Yes ONo

--------r·--_re; --;:

_;_

-r·--,::: _i::. ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week



OVery •somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

.t 3 or Less O 11 to 15 4 to 6 0 16 or More 7 to 10

of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -•Good -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -



;c.f f/(,;f.-) ~ fl t7M/ Mp)/M M u.:r c;:;, 7c;'/J / )det(,7 ~.,.er ,/~ 94( c: rt°/(, .



Metropolitan Ill Instt tional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty cillr'c'.cmJ

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an ny ous.

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ S.chool


not use V's or Xs to mark choices.


The Instructor:

2 ® Q)

• 0 © ® ® (j)

® ®

0 1

• ® Q) • @ @

0 0 © © ® ® ® ® (j) (j)

® ® ® ®

1 w ®

• @.

® 0 0 © ® ® ® (j)

® ®

Q) First College · @ Arts & Sciences

SU 0 Management • Prof. Studies



Not Applicable

Never

Seid.om Sometimes

· .. Usually Always

1. Stimulated student .thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 O O 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . .. :· , ...... , .................... '; ..... , . . . • 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. 9 CJ tJ 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. . ..................................... • O 0 O 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... • 0 0 O 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .....................................• 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning ............................. f/100000 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ 0 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter .......................................... e 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , gender, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ • 0 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful!, ......................................... 0>00000 14. Provided helpful written responses on st~den s' work. . .............................. • 0 0 0 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 0 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement ir lea ning. . ................................ a> 0 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to increase nderstanding and application. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... ~00000


0 Excellent every Good OGood OPoor OVery Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? t!> Yes ONo

-------------------------r·. -,J _,

._!.

-r·--c _,:: ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week



OVery 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


of the classroom space? I) Very Good OGood O Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---



rr~:f:t;;,rr


·~ •• j




Metropolitan '!'! I Instl tional Improvement Questionnaire State University liili'(;crn

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri u1um, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an ny ous.



2 0 1 1 ~ CD First College -® • ® ® ® Arts & Sciences -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use ti's or Xs to mark choices.


• ® ® ® © Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -


The Instructor:

./~ -~\

\

® ® (J)

® ®

® ® ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J)

® ® ® ® ® ®

• SP


Seldom Sometimes

' ' . . . . . u suaJIY;; . Always

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... ~ O 0 0 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcomes. . ...................................... Gi 0 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. ~ O 0 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ...................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... & 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ 000000 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... • 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ e 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student ........................................ eOOOOO 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 O 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful!, . . ....................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on slden s' work. . .............................. • 0 0 0 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 0 0 O 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i lea ning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr ase nderstanding and application .............. •OOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... 9 0 0 0 0 0


eExcellent OVery Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? 8Yes ONo

----------r·--J -r·--':"" -' ...i. -.l -r·-_i::

(: -----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week id you typically spend reparing for class?


OVery ~omewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -• Satisfactory -0 Unacceptable ~R -

tional Improvement Questionnaire ---Metropolitan State University would like i fo ation and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are a on


not use ti's or Xs to mark choices.


The Instructor:

•••@@® CD CD CD CD CD CD @@@@@@ ®®®®®® ©©©©©© ®®®®®® ®®®® ® cvcvcv cv• s@®®®® 9®®®®®

Fiscal Year/Tr

2 0 1 1 ® • ® ® CD CD • • CD SU

• @ @ @ ® ® ® ® ® FA © © © © ® ® ® ® • SP ® ® ® ® CV CV CV CV ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

--Course College/ School -CD First College -@ Arts & Sciences -® Management -e Prof. Studies -® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -


Seldom Sometimes

Always

----------,._ -J -r·--1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... • b O O O 0

2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O O O O -1:: ;

3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man b 0 0 0 0

-J 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... 0 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them res ectfully. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 0 0 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive to learning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ e C) 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... If 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag~, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, ·.

and sexual orientation ........................................................ 000000 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful!, . . ....................................... e C) 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on st~den s' work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 O 0 O 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • O O 0 O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement t lea ning. . ................................ • 0 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to increase nderstanding and application .............. •o 0 0 0 0 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... 4'i#OOOOO


•Excellent OVery Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? fbYes ONo

-r·--c _::: ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week



OVery e Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

of the classroom space? -every Good -

3 or Less 0 11 to 15 OGood -4 to 6 0 16 or More 7 to 10

0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -



Vo7 ~1' 1ruj . bs w: M5 ~ reA ( I' fk U.seju I eXAl-w k'J ;r/ s 7fu;f;0w..:s





Metropolitan 0 Inst'"uC1tional Improvement Questionnaire State University tlli'Wt1£cj

Metropolitan State University would like information and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the purripulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are a!libnyJJilous.

~--------------------t-. ~ di_gjt Course ID 0007fti] ®®®®®® CDCDCDCDCDCD ®®®®®® ®®®®®® ©©©©©© ®®®®®® i~@®®®® Irv Ci> Ci> Ci> Ci> Ci> i~®®®®® Im®®®®®


CD First College • Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do

not use Vs or Xs to mark choices.


-~

The Instructor:

2011'5 @•@@ CDCDeeCDSU •@@® ®®®®®FA ©©©© ®®®®esP ®®®® (J) (J) (J) (J)

®®®® ®®®®

® Arts & Sciences ® Management © Prof. Studies ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci ® Law Enf./Crim. Just.

Never 1.----"J=-~~~~N~o~t A~p-=-p~li-c_a:bl_e_, J.----'_::_----Se-Id_o_m_,·

l Sometimes ..-->------~ J ':..:.:::..::: t J.)"sually

l Always

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... 0 • 0 0 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom

1es. . ...................................... •@ 0 0 0 0

3. Explained course requirements and evaluatior criteria. . ............................. 0 • 0 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized manrer. . ..................................... 0 9 0 0 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... 0 • 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them respectfully ................................ •OOOOO 8. Created a classroom environment condL cive to learning. . ........................... 0 • 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track ..................................................... •OOOOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with studentE. . . . .................................... 0 • 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag~, gender, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, ·.

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ Gl 0 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful!}!. ........................................ 0 0 • 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on st~den s' work. . .............................. 0 e 0 0 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 • 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement t lea ning. . ................................ 0 • 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to increase nderstanding and application. . ............ 0 <O 0 0 0 0 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... • 0 0 0 0 0


O Excellent OVery Good OGood OPoor OVery Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •ves ONo

-------------------------r·--J _,._ -ii" u

-!.f -.J _,. _ _ i::

J:: -----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week id you typically spend reparing for class?




of the classroom space? OVeryGood •Good 0 Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---



a~rNf ~ £"'{y'ec/-qf~//(;~/t,1 /,I'(·

v-y 1i:woW1-e:1'f ""' te,, cttrly1r11 ft>ct I- /,f&





Metropol_it~ II Inst u tional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty [[mmw

---Metropolitan State University would like i o tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer

---questions on both sides. All responses are an ny --Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.



The Instructor:

2 ® CD

• ® © ® ® CV ® ®

0 1

• ® CD • ® ® ® ® © © ® ® ® ® CV CV ® ® ® ®

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ........ [ .......................... . 2. Explained course objectives and outcomes. . ...................... . 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............. . 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ...................... . 5. Made good use of community resources ......................... . 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................... . 7. Encouraged questions and treated them respectfully ................ . 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive to learning. . ........... . ·9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................ .

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................... . 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject mattert ......................... .

12. :~s :::u~~~~:~~=t~:~.I ~i.t~ .r~~~~~ ~~ ~~. '. ~. ~~~~·. r~~~'. ~~~~i~i.t~ •. ~e.li~'.~~· 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! . . ....................... .

15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . .... . 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i lea ning. . ................ .

1 .5 CD First College -® ® Arts & Sciences -

• CD SU ® Management -® • Prof. Studies -® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® SP -® -CV -® -® -----l Not Applicable

l Never

l Seldom

l Sometimes

J~~ \rlJSUalJY Ir< [ -· -' Always

.. •• 0

.. •• b .. • 0

• 0

• 0 . . •• 0

• 0

• 0 0 0

.. 0 • • 0 disabilities, .. • 0 .. • 0 .. 0 0

0 • •• 0

I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 6 0

• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

-r·--!"E -.-.: w -.1 -r·-_c -i:: -----------

14. Provided helpful written responses on slden s' work ................ .

17. Designed assignments and tests to incr ase nderstanding and applicatio n. 0 • 0 0 0 0 -18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................... .



22. How important was class attendance for understanding the subject?

•Very 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All





•• 0 0 0 0 0


----------24. How would you rate the quality -of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -• Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -



~ ~-S Ql'j{feg) s,.wlSC Df hlArnor ~ fro mo W ~ rY1 ;~

et5 vr&J. a!> '-i-o ~q,¥1 cR_





Metropofaan 0 Instl tional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty ~

Metropolitan State University would like i fo ation and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are a n



0 1 1 5 CD First College -•••@@® CD CD CD CD CD CD ®®®®®® ®®®®®® ©©©©©© ®®®®®® ®®@@•@

® • ® ® ® Arts & Sciences -• Fill response ovals completely - do

not use V's or Xs to mark choices. CD CD • • CD SU ® Management -

• ® ® ® 9tProf. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -


The Instructor:

7 cvcvecv• s@®®®® 9@®®®®

® ® CV ® ®

® ® ® ® CV CV ® ® ® ®

® • SP ® CV ® ®

Not Applicable

Never

Seldom

Always

1. Stimulated student thinking ......................... : ........................... 0.0000 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... • O 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. 0 • 0 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ...................................... 0 0 0 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... 0 0 e 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them res ectfully. . .............................. 0 • 0 0 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive to learning. . ........................... 0 • 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ • 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matterj ......................................... 0 ·.•·. 0 0.·... 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to agr, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, •..••.

and sexual orientation. . ...................................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefult ........................................ 0 · ·.·· 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on st~den s' work ................................ oeOOOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti"1e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 9 O O O 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement ir lea ning. . ................................ O 0 • 0 O 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to increlase nderstanding and application .............. 00.000 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0


0 Excellent GtlVery Good OGood OPoor OVery Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? ~Yes ONo

----------j·-

- j -r· .. --r· .. -l!:

..l -i·--c -1:: ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week





of the classroom space? OVeryGood OGood 0 Satisfactory • Unacceptable

---



f:xa\\t" \ (ov.JS-t_ v-\\\..-.- fo"~


d(.\_~i




kerrykleyman.weebly.comkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_sp11.… · llQ...

Documents

Transcript of kerrykleyman.weebly.comkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_sp11.… · llQ...