Livia Bizikova and Laszlo Pinter [email protected].
-
Upload
evan-caldwell -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Livia Bizikova and Laszlo Pinter [email protected].
Livia Bizikova and Laszlo [email protected]
Why measure?
To provide feedback on system behaviour and policy performance
To improve chances of successful adaptationTo ensure movement toward common goalsTo improve implementationTo increase accountability
Indicators and SDSince 1990s, SD creates opportunity and
challenges for ‘constructive ambiguity’Recognizing the links between environmental
conditions and human activitiesHighlighting the need for long-term
perspectivesConsidering equity both within and between
generationsEngaging the participation of all sectors of
society in the decision-making process
Steps in the integrated reporting processes
Australia Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, 1994)
Indicators should…Be developed within an accepted conceptual
frameworkBe clearly defined and easy to understandBe subject to aggregationBe objectiveHave reasonable data requirementsBe relevant to usersBe limited in numberReflect causes, process or results
(World Bank, 1997)
Examples of indicator system development
The partnerships in GEO accomplish the following:Ensure regional priorities and perceptions
are reflected;Provide a mechanism to aggregate
information across scale to the global level;Facilitate access to data and information;Increase policy relevance of the analysis;Help raise the profile of critical issues and
put emerging issues on the agenda;Contribute to improved policy coordination;
andProvide a quality-control mechanism.
Lessons from GEO for nationaland regional assessment
Assessment and reporting concepts and strategies
Stakeholders’ involvement in assessment and reporting
Report structureOrganization of reporting processCommunication of results
Regional indicator system for the area Regional indicator system for the area round Lake Balaton (Hungaryround Lake Balaton (Hungary))
Variability and change of the environment
Variability and change of the human system
Exposure unit
Ecosystem
Human system
Management and coordination of
adaptation and responses
External responseand adaptationmechanisms
Information
Influence
Monitoring system, evaluation reports
Implementation measures, projects
Specific adaptation measures
Data, mapserver, models, analytic tools
Priority issues and core indicators
Conceptual framework, architecture
Process / content integrationScoping
Indicator system development
Data collection and processing
Monitoring, evaluation, learning
Implementation
Development of adaptation options
ENGAGEMENT &
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
Integrated assessment report
Integrated assessment of trends and vulnerabilities
Scenarios, targets, action-plans
Scenario development and policy planning
Indicator analysis
System of 40 (at the beginning) down to 32 indicators
Indicators were analyzed based on a common template using the following questions:How is this indicator defined?What is happening in the region?How is society responding?What could be anticipated in the future?
“Failure of the week” – reporting on process
Developing a Sustainability Indicators Developing a Sustainability Indicators System to Measure the Well-being of System to Measure the Well-being of Winnipeg’s First Nations Community Winnipeg’s First Nations Community
Step in the system development
Well-being of the community
Domains of Well-being and Issues Impacting Well-being
Indicators are helpful: To carry out a more profound analysis of the
socio-economic conditions on the ground;
To shift from “top-down” governance towards a regional/local policy and decision-making;
To promote task orientation, with clear and enforced definition of responsibilities for actors involved in practical application of the decisions;
To link the indicator system with development measures’ implementation to monitor the induced changes and impacts
ChallengesData collection (numerous data-holders with
diverse format ) seems to be a challenge Accountability to the stakeholders – regular
communication
Thinking out of the box – getting to the different path then BAU
Monitoring issues that may not be significant currently