LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

download LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

of 16

Transcript of LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    1/16

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    2/16

    22

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    GranulationGranulation -- An OverviewAn Overview

    I - Liquid AbsorptionII - Liquid bridge formationIII - Interparticular void space fill-upS4 - Better wetted granules (denser)IV - Part of the mass is liquid saturatedV - System changes from Liquid in solid to Solid in Liquid

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    3/16

    33

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    How does Acoustic Emission work ?How does Acoustic Emission work ?Amplified AC

    signal

    AC to RMS

    conversion

    DC signalenvelope

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    4/1644

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    Comparison of Impeller TorqueComparison of Impeller Torquedata and Mean Acoustic Power datadata and Mean Acoustic Power data

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    500

    550

    600

    AE

    Power/Tor

    que

    AE Data

    Torque Data

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    5/1655

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    Acoustic MonitoringAcoustic Monitoring650 kHz Acoustic Emission sensors were applied to a650 kHz Acoustic Emission sensors were applied to a

    MiMi--Pro High Shear Granulator (900ml bowl)Pro High Shear Granulator (900ml bowl)

    Acoustic data was sampled at 100Hz from 128 pointsAcoustic data was sampled at 100Hz from 128 points(64 per sensor)(64 per sensor)

    Granulation conditions:Granulation conditions:

    !! 120g Batch size (Placebo formulation)120g Batch size (Placebo formulation)

    !! 800rpm impeller speed800rpm impeller speed

    !! 1000rpm chopper speed1000rpm chopper speed

    !! 6ml/min liquid dose rate (water)6ml/min liquid dose rate (water)

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    6/1666

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    Comparison of Impeller TorqueComparison of Impeller Torquedata and Mean Acoustic Power datadata and Mean Acoustic Power dataMi-Pro Placebo Granulation

    -1.50E+00

    -1.00E+00

    -5.00E-01

    0.00E+00

    5.00E-01

    1.00E+00

    Time

    Meanacousticpower

    0.0

    100.0

    200.0

    300.0

    400.0

    500.0

    600.0

    700.0

    ImpellerTorque Dry Blend

    Water start

    12-32ml

    32-38ml

    38-48ml

    Torque

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    7/1677

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    Test of Prediction Model for aTest of Prediction Model for a

    Placebo GranulationPlacebo Granulation

    19 data points were identified as indicators of the19 data points were identified as indicators of theendpoint (23 seconds of acoustic data)endpoint (23 seconds of acoustic data)

    EndEnd--point data was then modelled using SIMCApoint data was then modelled using SIMCA

    software to create the prediction modelsoftware to create the prediction model

    A batch was then manufactured using theA batch was then manufactured using theprediction modelprediction model

    A class boundary of 3 standard deviations from theA class boundary of 3 standard deviations from themodel endmodel end--point was selectedpoint was selected

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    8/1688

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    Results for a placebo granulation usingResults for a placebo granulation usingthe prediction modelthe prediction model

    0.0

    100.0

    200.0

    300.0

    400.0

    500.0

    600.0

    700.0

    Time

    Torque(m

    Nm

    )

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    35.0

    40.0

    45.0

    50.0

    SD'dtoendpoint

    Impeller Torque

    Liquid Volume

    Prediction

    Class Boundary (SD)

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    9/1699

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    Testing of Prediction modelTesting of Prediction model

    To further test the model,To further test the model,batches of placebo granulebatches of placebo granule

    were manufactured usingwere manufactured usingvarying dose rates, impellervarying dose rates, impellerand chopper speeds, andand chopper speeds, andbatch sizesbatch sizes

    In each case the granulationIn each case the granulationwas halted at the predictedwas halted at the predictedendend--point (2.5 standardpoint (2.5 standarddeviation class boundarydeviation class boundary

    applied)applied)

    Wet and dried granule wereWet and dried granule werethen analysed for a range ofthen analysed for a range of

    solid state characteristicssolid state characteristics(density, particle size etc)(density, particle size etc)

    5 3 800 120 10006 9 800 120 1000

    7 6 800 120 1000

    8 6 1000 120 1000

    9 6 600 120 100010 6 800 120 1000

    11 6 800 120 1000

    12 6 800 100 1000

    13 6 800 140 100014 6 800 120 500

    15 6 800 120 1500

    Batch No.

    Impeller

    speed

    (rpm)

    Dose

    Rate

    (ml/min)

    Batch

    Size (g)

    Chopper

    speed

    (rpm)

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    10/161010

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    6ml/min; 800rpm6ml/min; 800rpm

    Mi-Pro 900ml placebo granulation monitored using acoustic emission in prediction mode stopping at the predicted end-

    point (6ml/min dose rate; 795rpm)

    0.0

    50.0

    100.0

    150.0

    200.0

    250.0

    300.0

    350.0

    400.0

    450.0

    500.0

    10:04:48 10:06:14 10:07:41 10:09:07 10:10:34 10:12:00 10:13:26 10:14:53

    Time

    ImpellerTorque

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    35.0

    40.0

    SDstoEnd

    -point/Dosedvolume

    (ml)

    Impeller Torque

    Dose Volume (ml)

    Prediction (SD)

    Class Boundary

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    11/161111

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    6ml/min; 600rpm6ml/min; 600rpm

    Mi-Pro 900ml placebo granulation monitored using acoustic emission in prediction mode stopping at the predicted end-

    point (6ml/min dose rate; 595rpm)

    0.0

    50.0

    100.0

    150.0

    200.0

    250.0

    300.0

    350.0

    400.0

    450.0

    500.0

    10:06:14 10:07:41 10:09:07 10:10:34 10:12:00 10:13:26 10:14:53

    Time

    ImpellerTorque

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    35.0

    SDstoEnd

    -point/Dosedvolume

    (ml)

    Impeller Torque

    Dose Volume (ml)

    Prediction (SD)

    Class Boundary

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    12/161212

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    Granulation ResultsGranulation Results

    The system was able to identify endThe system was able to identify end--points (acousticpoints (acoustic

    data passes the class boundary) for each of thedata passes the class boundary) for each of thebatches at 800rpm, despite varying dose rates,batches at 800rpm, despite varying dose rates,chopper speeds and batch sizeschopper speeds and batch sizes

    However, the system did not predict an endHowever, the system did not predict an end--point forpoint forthe batches manufactured at 600 and 1000rpmthe batches manufactured at 600 and 1000rpm

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    13/16

    1313

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    Physical Characterisation ResultsPhysical Characterisation Results

    for the Granulefor the Granule

    Bulk

    Density

    Mean

    Rheology

    (mJ)

    SpecificSurface

    Area

    (m/g)

    Bulk

    Density

    Tapped

    Bulk

    Density

    Compressibility

    (%)

    5 3 800 120 1000 09:54 29.9 0.39 76.3 91.9 84.1 0.42 0.47 0.62 24.19

    6 9 800 120 1000 04:11 37.6 0.46 87.3 100 93.65 0.47 0.48 0.6 207 6 800 120 1000 05:48 34.8 0.4 93.5 80.4 86.95 0.56 0.45 0.6 25

    8 6 1000 120 1000 05:10 37.4 0.44 111 92 101.5 0.43 0.5 0.62 19.35

    9 6 600 120 1000 05:01 30.4 0.36 84.5 74.5 79.5 0.54 0.35 0.51 31.37

    10 6 800 120 1000 05:26 33.1 0.39 84.1 95.8 89.95 0.53 0.4 0.57 29.8211 6 800 120 1000 05:50 35.4 0.4 81.3 83.6 82.45 0.42 0.43 0.56 23.21

    12 6 800 100 1000 04:56 30.1 0.35 77.4 101 89.2 - 0.42 0.55 23.64

    13 6 800 140 1000 06:08 37.3 0.39 99.6 86.8 93.2 - 0.43 0.57 24.56

    14 6 800 120 500 04:13 25.6 0.31 74 92.5 83.25 - 0.32 0.45 28.89

    15 6 800 120 1500 04:08 25.2 0.35 85.1 65.3 75.2 - 0.33 0.47 29.7916 6 800 120 500 05:47 34.8 0.39 77.6 71.6 74.6 - 0.44 0.58 24.14

    17 6 800 120 1500 05:14 31.8 0.39 77.7 79.3 78.5 - 0.44 0.55 20

    Rheology (mJ)

    Wet Mass testing

    Batch No.

    Water

    content

    (ml)

    Impeller

    speed

    (rpm)

    Dose

    Rate

    (ml/min)

    Time to

    End-point

    (mins)

    Batch

    Size (g)

    Chopper

    speed

    (rpm)

    Dry Mass Testing

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    14/16

    1414

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    Physical Characterisation ResultsPhysical Characterisation Results

    for the Granulefor the Granule

    1000rpm

    Impeller

    speed

    600rpm

    Impeller speed

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    15/16

    1515

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    Discussion of ResultsDiscussion of Results

    Main physical differences between the granuleMain physical differences between the granulebatches manufactured using varied impeller speedsbatches manufactured using varied impeller speeds

    are:are:

    Particle size distributionParticle size distribution

    RheologyRheology

    Bulk density (Dried granule)Bulk density (Dried granule)

    Factors such as particle size (and particle velocity),Factors such as particle size (and particle velocity),will have an impact on the acoustic frequencies andwill have an impact on the acoustic frequencies andso affect the models predictive capabilityso affect the models predictive capability

  • 8/3/2019 LIU 937 2010 7 Granulation BMS Data

    16/16

    1616

    Pharmaceutical Research Institute

    ConclusionsConclusions

    The prediction model has been demonstrated to beThe prediction model has been demonstrated to be

    robust in that it is able to identify the process endrobust in that it is able to identify the process end--point using differing dose rates and batch sizespoint using differing dose rates and batch sizes

    The model has been able to provide granule withThe model has been able to provide granule with

    the same physical characteristics despite variedthe same physical characteristics despite varieddose rates and batch sizesdose rates and batch sizes

    The model was affected by a change in excipientThe model was affected by a change in excipient

    batch, highlighting the importance of control ofbatch, highlighting the importance of control ofphysical properties for this technique.physical properties for this technique.

    Acoustic emission could be a valuable addition toAcoustic emission could be a valuable addition to

    the PAT toolbox for the monitoring of wetthe PAT toolbox for the monitoring of wetgranulationsgranulations