Litter size and piglet birth weights - Iowa State University · Litter size and piglet birth...
Transcript of Litter size and piglet birth weights - Iowa State University · Litter size and piglet birth...
1
Thank you for participating in SowBridge 2012-13.
To start this presentation, advance one slide by pressing enter or the down or right arrow key.
Breeding Herd Education Series 2012-2013
Timely, relevant & convenient learning
Litter size and piglet birth weights
Dr. Mark Knauer North Carolina State University
Outline
Problems with small birth weight piglets
Strategies to improve piglet quality – Genetics
– Management
Summary
2
Problems with small birth
weight piglets
Physical problems with small birth weight piglets
Impaired prenatal development (Foxcroft et
al., 2006)
Have difficulty maintaining body
temperature (Alonso-Spilsbury et al., 2007)
Miss nursing episodes (Deen and Bilkei,
2004)
4
Production problems with small birth weight piglets
Reduced preweaning survival
Reduced nursery survival
Reduced growth rate
Reduced probability of being full value
at market
5
2
Reduced survivability with low birth weight piglets
Fix et al., 2010 6
Relationship between piglet birth weight and likelihood of being full value at market
Fix et al., 2010 7
Genetic strategies to improve
piglet quality
Genetics play a sizeable role in piglet birth weight
5%
25%
70%
Genetics of the pigGenetics of the sowEnvironment
9
Increased litter size is associated with reduced piglet birth weight
Holl and Long, 2006 10
Increased litter size is associated with reduced preweaning survival
Hostetler and Knauer, 2012
11.8 12.1 12.3 12.5 12.8 13.0
9.3 9.4 9.6 9.7 10.0 10.1
9
10
11
12
13
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
No.
Year
TNBNW
11
3
Has your genetic company
implemented strategies to improve
piglet quality?
Selection for improved piglet quality is possible
Ohio State University study – Selection for improved sow productivity
index (SPI)
– SPI = 6.5 x number born alive + 21 d litter
weight
– 10 generations of selection Select line
Control line (no selection practiced)
Neal and Irvin, 1992 13
Selection for improved SPI – generation 9
7
8
9
10
11
TNB NBA
SelectControl
20
40
60
80
100
LBW LWW
lb. SelectControl
Neal and Irvin, 1992 14
Selection for improved piglet quality is possible
National Swine Registry 15
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Pounds
Management strategies to
improve piglet quality
Management influences on piglet birth weight
Dutch observational study – Purpose to identify factors related to piglet
birth weight
– Data capture 80 question survey
farms visits
– 19 farms Opschoor et al., 2010
17
4
Management factors associated with piglet birth weight
Advantage (A) Disadvantage (D) Diff. in birth weight, lb. (A-D)
Gilts quarantined Gilts not quarantined 0.1
Group gestation Gestation stalls 0.1
Natural farrowing Induced farrowing 0.1
Lactation diet @ W2E Gestation diet @ W2E 0.1
Very good farm hygiene Average farm hygiene 0.5
18
Opschoor et al., 2010
Impact of lactation factors on subsequent birth weight Trait Regression coefficient on
birth weight, g P-value
Lactation length, d 6 0.49
Total feed intake, kg 0.41 0.55
Total crude fat, g 0.01 0.05**
Total starch & sugar, g 0.001 0.06*
**significant, *trend
Opschoor et al., 2010 19
Impact of wean-to-estrus nutrition on subsequent birth weight
20
Trait Regression coefficient on birth weight, g
P-value
Total feed intake, kg 4.6 0.08*
Feed intake per d, kg 45 0.02**
Digestible lysine per d, g 3.6 0.02**
Digestible threonine per d, g 9.6 0.01**
**significant, *trend
Opschoor et al., 2010
Sow requirements for piglet growth change throughout gestation
Consider phase feeding in gestation
McPherson et al., 2004 21
Impact of gestation nutrition on subsequent birth weight
22
Opschoor et al., 2010
Trait Regression coefficient on birth weight, g
P-value
Total feed intake, kg 1.2 0.04**
Total digestible lysine, g 0.069 0.09*
Total starch and sugar, g
0.001 0.07*
**significant, *trend
Gestation feeding strategies to maximize piglet birth weight may differ between gilts
and sows
Gilt gestation feeding from 100 to 114 days
Normal Bump fed 4 pounds per d P-value
Birth weight, lb. 2.89 3.16 0.01**
Sow gestation feeding from 100 to 114 days
Normal Bump fed 4 pounds per d P-value
Birth weight, lb. NS
Soto et al., 2011 23
5
Optimize gestation feed intake
Bump feed gilts in late gestation
Feed sows according to body condition
1 2 3 4 5 24
Feed sows according to body condition
Sow body condition caliper
Ultrasound backfat
25
Summary – Improving piglet quality
Genetics – Selection for improved piglet quality is possible!
Ask your genetic supplier how they are addressing
piglet quality
Use a balanced selection approach incorporating
litter size and litter birth weight and/or litter weaning
weight
26
Summary – Improving piglet quality Feeding management
– Lactation Ensure high feed intake
– Wean-to-estrus Ad libitum intake
Use lactation diet
– Gestation Bump feed gilts in late gestation
Feed sows based on an objective measure of body
condition 27
Summary – Improving piglet quality
Other management considerations – Quarantine gilts before herd entry
– Do not induce farrowing before day 114 of
gestation
– Maximize farm hygiene (perhaps related to
good farm managers)
28
Thank you for your time
Mark Knauer [email protected]
6
References Foxcroft, G. R., W. T. Dixon, S. Novak, C. T. Putman, S. C. Town, and M. D. A. Vinsky. 2006. The
biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs. 84:E105-E112. Alonso-Spilsbury, M., R. Ramírez-Necoechea, M. González-Lozano, D. Mota-Rojas, and M. E. Trujillo-
Ortega, 2007. Piglet survival in early lactation: A review. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 6:78-86. Deen, M. G. H., and G. Bilkei. 2004. Cross fostering of low-birthweight piglets. Livest. Prod. Sci.
90:279-284. Fix, J.S., J.P. Cassady, J.W. Holl, W.O. Herring, M.S. Culbertson, and M.T. See. 2010. Effect of piglet birth
weight on survival and quality of commercial swine. Livest. Sci. 132:98-106. Fix, J.S., J.P. Cassady, W.O. Herring, J.W. Holl, M.S. Culbertson, and M.T. See. 2010. Effect of piglet birth
weight on body weight, growth, backfat, and longissimus muscle area of commercial market swine. Livest. Prod. Sci. 127:51-59.
Holl, J., and T. Long. 2006. Improving weaned pig quality in today’s large litters. Record of 31st Proc. National Swine Imprv. Fed. Conf. Ann. Mtg. Nashville, TN. Dec. 7-8. Available at: http://www.nsif.com/Conferences/2006/pdf/ImprovedWeanedPigQuality.pdf
Hostetler, C. E. and M. T. Knauer. 2012 (Abstr.). Industry productivity analysis - Sow farm traits. J. Anim. Sci. 90(Suppl. 3):639.
Neal, S. M., and K. M. Irvin. 1992. Correlated changes in reproductive components accompanying 10 generations of selection for improved sow productivity index. J. Anim. Sci. 70:2322-2327.
National Swine Registry, West Lafayette, IN. Available at: http://www.nationalswine.com/Genetic_Tech_pages/STAGES.html
Opschoor, C. T., S. Bloemhof, M. Knauer, and E. Knol. 2010. Management influences on birth weight, phase 2. Available at: http://www.topigs.com/images/stories/pdf/Final_Report_birthweightstudy_phase2.pdf
Soto, J. L., L. Greiner, J. Connor, and G. Allee. 2011(Abstr.). Effect of increasing feeding levels in sows during late gestation on piglet birth weights. J. Anim. Sci. 89(Suppl. 2):239.
McPherson, R. L., F. Ji, G. Wu, J. R. Blanton, Jr., and S. W. Kim. 2004. Growth and compositional changes of fetal tissues of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 82:2534-2540.
30