literary criticism table II.doc
Transcript of literary criticism table II.doc
-
8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc
1/7
Lit Crit Table II
Literary
Tradition Historicism
New
Historicism Freudian Archetypal Biographical Femini
#ar$ist %ociological
Approach Literature is its purpose methodology implications
Literary
Tradition
To Top
grows out of
previously
written forms
and works,
especially in
specific genre.Ex. Some
Shakespeare
sonnets parody
earlier
Petrarchan
sonnets. See
also Genre
Criticism.
Literature
uilds and
improves on a
great tradition.
!eader
appreciatesliterature in
context of other
great works.
"dentify and
explain how a work
uses traditional
forms and materials
and how it departs
from them. #iewthe work in terms
of preceding and
succeeding
literature in similar
style, genre and
theme.
fits in with
historical, new
historical,
reader$reponse,
genre criticism,
and others.%pposes strictly
formalist
analysis. &est
used in
con'unction
with other
approaches.
Historicism
To Top
is not
autonomous
ut is an
expression of
the powerful
ideas and world
view of the
author(s culture
and era.
Literature
provides
cultural and
historical
insight.
"dentify systems of
thought and large
historical forces
that determine and
inform literary
expression in an
era. Ex. great chain
of eing in the
!enaissance found
in many works.
is asic in
literary study$$
to see the work
in terms of
historical
ackground.
)ith the advent
of literary
theory, has
given way to
the more
complex,
political *ew
+istoricism.
http://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tradhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tradhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#histhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#nhisthttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#nhisthttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#freudhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#archhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#bioghttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#bioghttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#femhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#marxhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#sochttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#sochttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#genhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#genhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#genhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#histhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#nhisthttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#nhisthttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#freudhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#archhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#bioghttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#femhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#marxhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#sochttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#genhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#genhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tradhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#trad
-
8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc
2/7
New
Historicism
To Top
exists in a
complex
relation with
culture and is a
communal
product, a
systematic
socio$cultural
act -GLC!
/0. )orks
show
themselves to
e ound y
social codes
andconventions,
while they
prove, in other
ways, to
suvert or
undercut the
dominant
eliefs of their
society
-&arton and+udson, CGL1,
2330.
literature not
'ust aesthetic or
simply
reflective of
history and
ideas. Gives a
sense of how
literature
functions
within culture
to support and
challenge its
culture.
Look at marginal
texts as well as
canonical4
pamphlets,
maga5ines,
newspapers, odd
stories and
anecdotes. Look at
sex, gender, class,
colonialism. Look
at interconnections
among author(s life
and ehavior,
written texts, and
the elief systemsof the culture.
critici5ed
historicism for
using history
only as a
ackground for
author(s life and
work. &rought
in larger
networks of
meaning to
show how art
functions
within a
culture. 6ility
of art to suvertdominant
culture gives it
political
significance.
Freudian
To Top
is a symolic
statement of
unconscious
fantasies that
the artist 7and
reader8 could
not otherwise
admit -GLC!29:0.
to reveal
unconscious
fantasies of the
author, reader,
critic, and even
fictional
characters.
#alue is in howthe reader can
defend against
or come to
terms with a
very disturing
fantasy y
Study the text as an
expression of the
author(s
unconscious
fantasies. Ex.
6naly5ing the
%edipal Complex
as worked out in Hamlet can reveal
how Shakespeare
worked that out.
!eader and
audience response
reveals how the
suggests that
misreadings of
a text are as or
more
significant than
an oviously
correct one.
)orks on theassumption that
authors,
characters, and
readers may e
unaware of the
reasons for their
http://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#top
-
8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc
3/7
displacing it
into less
threatening
symolic terms.
6uthors work
through
unconscious
fantasies
through
creating more
manageale
versions.
reader comes to
terms with it. Can
psychoanaly5e
characters and
especially readers
-see !eader
!esponse criticism0
ehavior
-GLC! 29;0.
Suggests
profoundly
personal
reasons for
writing and
reading
literature that
has
implications for
the
psychological
health of
writers andreaders.
Archetypal
&'ung(
To Top
is an expression
of universal
experience
across time and
cultures found
in consistent
patterns, myths,
and symols
calledarchetypes.
Literature
reveals the
collective
unconscious,
an inorn
repository of
universal
images.
6nalysis of
literature can
reveal
archetypes
across cultures
and help to
discern their
meaning.
reudian
approaches.
Study patterns of
myths, images,
symols, icons and
other archetypes
that appear in many
cultures. #iew each
literary work as an
individual
articulation of anunderlying
archetype. Ex.
reirth archetype in
the &ile -?onah
and the )hale and
in The Rime of the
Ancient Mariner .
universali5es
literature.
1hought to e
reductionist y
some critics in
its use of a few
patterns to
explain
literature. +asspiritual
implications in
its metaphysical
elief in the
collective
unconscious.
http://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#rrhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#rrhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#rrhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#rrhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#rrhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#top
-
8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc
4/7
Biographical
To Top
@eaning of
work is
reflective of
experiences of
author.
Anowledge of
author(s life can
key insights
into the work(s
purpose,
author(s
choices.
to provide
insight into
author(s lives
and thought and
the intent of the
work to etter
understand oth
!esearch author(s
life for connections
and parallels in the
work.
Psychoiography
looks at author(s
deep psychology
and the work as
expression or
working out of
deep$seated
neuroses.
can yield a
greater
understanding
of the work.
!eveals
perspectives on
the work that
may not arise
through other
methods. &ut,
>ormalists
critici5ed the
(intentional
fallacy of
iographicalcriticism.
&ottom line4
many readers
are interested in
oth the
author(s life and
art.
Feminist
To Top
mirrors, resists,
or reinforces
patriarchal,male$centered
culture,
stereotypes and
oppression of
women.
can reveal
sexist
constructions of women and
challenge their
inevitaility.
Can raise
consciousness
and promote
change. Can
reveal strengths
of women
repressed under partriarchy.
6naly5e traditional
canon of male
writers for sexiststereotyping -ex.
madonnaBwhore
opposition0 focus
on women writers,
especially those
ignored, on their
creative processes,
language freed
from
phallogocentrism.
reinforces the
idea that
literature is a profound
element in the
maintenance of
male power and
privilege.
Provides a new
perspective on
literature and
the canon from
the point ofview of an
oppressed,
excluded
minority -see
also 6$6
Criticism0. +as
http://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/phallo.htmlhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/phallo.htmlhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/phallo.html
-
8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc
5/7
expanded the
canon to
include many
previously
excluded
women authors
and challenged
and politici5ed
criteria for
evaluating
literary merit.
-
8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc
6/7
critical
lindness.
Legitimi5es
literature as
political action
for 'ustice.
%ociological
To Top
a document of
social phenomena or a
product of
those same
phemonena
-GLC! /:0.
Literature
illuminates thestudy of social
phemonena and
vice versa.
!ead from society
into text or viceversa. Link
individual to
collective ehavior,
social groups,
institutions, and
forces. Look at
relationship
etween authors
and audiences -see
also rhetoricalcriticism0 the
effect of the
organi5ation of the
ook trade explicit
and implicit
political ideas in
literary works.
links
individuals andtexts to
collective
phenomena,
like >eminist,
@arxist, *ew
+istoricist, ut
tries to e more
o'ective in
its analysis.
Does not applya strong version
of social
structure, such
as in @arxism.
http://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#top
-
8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc
7/7
#ar$ist
To Top
reflects the
material forces
operative at a
specific time
and promotes
or impedes
progress
towards
socialist utopia.
Literature
either reveals
or mystifies the
truth aout
class structure,
class struggle, political
economy, and
ideology.
Literature has
great moral
force,
especially
realist works
that depict
material
conditions. Can
raise
consciousness
aout nature of
capitalism and
the plight of the
workers.
6naly5e the ways
in which the human
su'ect is formed
and sociali5ed
through a
manufactured view
of reality and truth.
6naly5e how
ideology is
expressed and
demystified in a
work. 6nalyse how
a work reveals
class structure as a
political construct.
"n some cases,
adheres to a
rigid version of
society and
politics. #ery
frank in its
political aims
and a good
antidote to
formalist, anti$
political
criticism. Like
>eminist,
Sociological,
*ew +istorical,and 6frican$
6merican
criticism, it
views literature
as part of the
material
conditions of
culture, not 'ust
a reflection of
them.
Literary Criticism Table I