literary criticism table II.doc

download literary criticism table II.doc

of 7

Transcript of literary criticism table II.doc

  • 8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc

    1/7

    Lit Crit Table II

      Literary

    Tradition Historicism

     New

    Historicism Freudian Archetypal  Biographical  Femini

     #ar$ist  %ociological

     Approach  Literature is  its purpose  methodology  implications

     

    Literary

    Tradition

     

    To Top 

    grows out of

     previously

    written forms

    and works,

    especially in

    specific genre.Ex. Some

    Shakespeare

    sonnets parody

    earlier

    Petrarchan

    sonnets. See

    also Genre

    Criticism.

     Literature

     uilds and

    improves on a

    great tradition.

    !eader

    appreciatesliterature in

    context of other 

    great works.

    "dentify and

    explain how a work 

    uses traditional

    forms and materials

    and how it departs

    from them. #iewthe work in terms

    of preceding and

    succeeding

    literature in similar

    style, genre and

    theme.

     fits in with

    historical, new

    historical,

    reader$reponse,

    genre criticism,

    and others.%pposes strictly

    formalist

    analysis. &est

    used in

    con'unction

    with other

    approaches.

     Historicism

     

    To Top 

    is not

    autonomous

     ut is an

    expression of

    the powerful

    ideas and world

    view of the

    author(s culture

    and era.

    Literature

     provides

    cultural and

    historical

    insight.

    "dentify systems of

    thought and large

    historical forces

    that determine and

    inform literary

    expression in an

    era. Ex. great chain

    of eing in the

    !enaissance found

    in many works.

    is asic in

    literary study$$

    to see the work

    in terms of

    historical

     ackground.

    )ith the advent

    of literary

    theory, has

    given way to

    the more

    complex,

     political *ew

    +istoricism.

    http://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tradhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tradhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#histhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#nhisthttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#nhisthttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#freudhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#archhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#bioghttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#bioghttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#femhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#marxhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#sochttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#sochttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#genhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#genhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#genhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#histhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#nhisthttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#nhisthttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#freudhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#archhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#bioghttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#femhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#marxhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#sochttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#genhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#genhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tradhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#trad

  • 8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc

    2/7

    New

    Historicism

    To Top 

    exists in a

    complex

    relation with

    culture and is a

    communal

     product, a

    systematic

    socio$cultural

    act -GLC!

    /0. )orks

    show

    themselves to

     e ound y

    social codes

    andconventions,

    while they

     prove, in other

    ways, to

    suvert or

    undercut the

    dominant

     eliefs of their

    society

    -&arton and+udson, CGL1,

    2330.

     literature not

     'ust aesthetic or 

    simply

    reflective of

    history and

    ideas. Gives a

    sense of how

    literature

    functions

    within culture

    to support and

    challenge its

    culture.

    Look at marginal

    texts as well as

    canonical4

     pamphlets,

    maga5ines,

    newspapers, odd

    stories and

    anecdotes. Look at

    sex, gender, class,

    colonialism. Look

    at interconnections

    among author(s life

    and ehavior,

    written texts, and

    the elief systemsof the culture.

     critici5ed

    historicism for

    using history

    only as a

     ackground for

    author(s life and

    work. &rought

    in larger

    networks of

    meaning to

    show how art

    functions

    within a

    culture. 6ility

    of art to suvertdominant

    culture gives it

     political

    significance.

     

    Freudian

     

    To Top 

    is a symolic

    statement of

    unconscious

    fantasies that

    the artist 7and

    reader8 could

    not otherwise

    admit -GLC!29:0.

    to reveal

    unconscious

    fantasies of the

    author, reader,

    critic, and even

    fictional

    characters.

    #alue is in howthe reader can

    defend against

    or come to

    terms with a

    very disturing

    fantasy y

    Study the text as an

    expression of the

    author(s

    unconscious

    fantasies. Ex.

    6naly5ing the

    %edipal Complex

    as worked out in Hamlet  can reveal

    how Shakespeare

    worked that out.

    !eader and

    audience response

    reveals how the

    suggests that

    misreadings of

    a text are as or

    more

    significant than

    an oviously

    correct one.

    )orks on theassumption that

    authors,

    characters, and

    readers may e

    unaware of the

    reasons for their 

    http://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#top

  • 8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc

    3/7

    displacing it

    into less

    threatening

    symolic terms.

    6uthors work

    through

    unconscious

    fantasies

    through

    creating more

    manageale

    versions.

    reader comes to

    terms with it. Can

     psychoanaly5e

    characters and

    especially readers

    -see !eader

    !esponse criticism0

     ehavior

    -GLC! 29;0.

    Suggests

     profoundly

     personal

    reasons for

    writing and

    reading

    literature that

    has

    implications for 

    the

     psychological

    health of

    writers andreaders.

     

    Archetypal

    &'ung(

     

    To Top 

    is an expression

    of universal

    experience

    across time and

    cultures found

    in consistent

     patterns, myths,

    and symols

    calledarchetypes.

    Literature

    reveals the

    collective

    unconscious,

    an inorn

    repository of

    universal

    images.

    6nalysis of

    literature can

    reveal

    archetypes

    across cultures

    and help to

    discern their

    meaning.

    reudian

    approaches.

     Study patterns of

    myths, images,

    symols, icons and

    other archetypes

    that appear in many

    cultures. #iew each

    literary work as an

    individual

    articulation of anunderlying

    archetype. Ex.

    reirth archetype in

    the &ile -?onah

    and the )hale and

    in The Rime of the

     Ancient Mariner .

     universali5es

    literature.

    1hought to e

    reductionist y

    some critics in

    its use of a few

     patterns to

    explain

    literature. +asspiritual

    implications in

    its metaphysical

     elief in the

    collective

    unconscious.

    http://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#rrhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#rrhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#rrhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#rrhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html#rrhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#top

  • 8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc

    4/7

     Biographical

     

    To Top 

    @eaning of

    work is

    reflective of

    experiences of

    author.

    Anowledge of

    author(s life can

    key insights

    into the work(s

     purpose,

    author(s

    choices.

      to provide

    insight into

    author(s lives

    and thought and

    the intent of the

    work to etter

    understand oth

    !esearch author(s

    life for connections

    and parallels in the

    work.

    Psychoiography

    looks at author(s

    deep psychology

    and the work as

    expression or

    working out of

    deep$seated

    neuroses.

    can yield a

    greater

    understanding

    of the work.

    !eveals

     perspectives on

    the work that

    may not arise

    through other

    methods. &ut,

    >ormalists

    critici5ed the

    (intentional

    fallacy of

     iographicalcriticism.

    &ottom line4

    many readers

    are interested in

     oth the

    author(s life and

    art.

     Feminist

    To Top 

    mirrors, resists,

    or reinforces

     patriarchal,male$centered

    culture,

    stereotypes and

    oppression of

    women.

    can reveal

    sexist

    constructions of women and

    challenge their

    inevitaility.

    Can raise

    consciousness

    and promote

    change. Can

    reveal strengths

    of women

    repressed under  partriarchy.

     6naly5e traditional

    canon of male

    writers for sexiststereotyping -ex.

    madonnaBwhore

    opposition0 focus

    on women writers,

    especially those

    ignored, on their

    creative processes,

    language freed

    from

     phallogocentrism.

    reinforces the

    idea that

    literature is a profound

    element in the

    maintenance of

    male power and

     privilege.

    Provides a new

     perspective on

    literature and

    the canon from

    the point ofview of an

    oppressed,

    excluded

    minority -see

    also 6$6

    Criticism0. +as

    http://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/phallo.htmlhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/phallo.htmlhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/phallo.html

  • 8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc

    5/7

    expanded the

    canon to

    include many

     previously

    excluded

    women authors

    and challenged

    and politici5ed

    criteria for

    evaluating

    literary merit.

  • 8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc

    6/7

    critical

     lindness.

    Legitimi5es

    literature as

     political action

    for 'ustice.

     %ociological

     

    To Top 

    a document of

    social phenomena or a

     product of

    those same

     phemonena

    -GLC! /:0.

     Literature

    illuminates thestudy of social

     phemonena and

    vice versa.

     !ead from society

    into text or viceversa. Link

    individual to

    collective ehavior,

    social groups,

    institutions, and

    forces. Look at

    relationship

     etween authors

    and audiences -see

    also rhetoricalcriticism0 the

    effect of the

    organi5ation of the

     ook trade explicit

    and implicit

     political ideas in

    literary works.

    links

    individuals andtexts to

    collective

     phenomena,

    like >eminist,

    @arxist, *ew

    +istoricist, ut

    tries to e more

    o'ective in

    its analysis.

    Does not applya strong version

    of social

    structure, such

    as in @arxism.

    http://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#top

  • 8/18/2019 literary criticism table II.doc

    7/7

     #ar$ist

     

    To Top 

    reflects the

    material forces

    operative at a

    specific time

    and promotes

    or impedes

     progress

    towards

    socialist utopia.

    Literature

    either reveals

    or mystifies the

    truth aout

    class structure,

    class struggle, political

    economy, and

    ideology.

     Literature has

    great moral

    force,

    especially

    realist works

    that depict

    material

    conditions. Can

    raise

    consciousness

    aout nature of

    capitalism and

    the plight of the

    workers.

     6naly5e the ways

    in which the human

    su'ect is formed

    and sociali5ed

    through a

    manufactured view

    of reality and truth.

    6naly5e how

    ideology is

    expressed and

    demystified in a

    work. 6nalyse how

    a work reveals

    class structure as a

     political construct.

     "n some cases,

    adheres to a

    rigid version of

    society and

     politics. #ery

    frank in its

     political aims

    and a good

    antidote to

    formalist, anti$

     political

    criticism. Like

    >eminist,

    Sociological,

     *ew +istorical,and 6frican$

    6merican

    criticism, it

    views literature

    as part of the

    material

    conditions of

    culture, not 'ust

    a reflection of

    them. 

    Literary Criticism Table I

     

    http://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/ideology.htmlhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.htmlhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable2.html#tophttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/ideology.htmlhttp://www-as.phy.ohiou.edu/~rouzie/307j/litcrittable1.html