Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

42
Literature Reviews for the Health Sciences June 21, 2010 Robin Featherstone Clinical Medicine Librarian [email protected] Presentation available at: www.slideshare.net/featherr

description

Presentation given at the University of Western Ontario as part of the Graduate Student Workshop series on June 21, 2010.

Transcript of Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Page 1: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Literature Reviews for the Health Sciences

June 21, 2010Robin FeatherstoneClinical Medicine [email protected] available at: www.slideshare.net/featherr

Page 2: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

What’s a Research Lit Review?

A research literature review is a systematic, explicit and reproducible method for identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing the existing body of

completed and recorded work produced by researchers, scholars, and practitioners.*

*Fink, A. (2005). Conducting Research Literature Reviews. London: Sage.

Page 3: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Why would you have to conduct one?

• For your thesis• For your work as a research assistant• For a funding proposal or grant application• For your academic work as a faculty member• For your work as a professional researcher

Page 4: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

7 tasks in the Research Lit Review

1. Selecting research questions2. Selecting your sources3. Choosing search terms4. Running your search5. Applying practical screening criteria6. Applying methodological screening criteria7. Synthesizing the results

Page 5: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Selecting research questions

Page 6: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Why do I need a research question?

• To guide your review• To provide you with keywords for your search• To give your research precision

Page 7: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Scenario

You’re applying for a grant to support your research on hygiene in clinical settings.

Think of some specific questions related to this topic...

Page 8: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

QuestionsBroad:• What are the best methods of maintaining a

clean clinical environment?

Narrow:• Does hand washing prevent MRSA in the ICU?

Very Narrow:• What are the attitudes of general practitioners in

Southern Ontario to the use of hand washing to prevent MRSA?

Page 9: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

How questions influence search results

Relevancy

Retrieval(# of search results)

Broad Questions

Narrow Questions

High = lots of articles

Low = very few articles

High = directly relevant articles

Low = mostly irrelevant articles

Page 10: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Good Question for Literature Review

Narrow:• Does hand washing prevent MRSA in the ICU?

Page 11: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Selecting your sources

Page 12: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Lit reviews depend on data from seven sources

1. Online public bibliographic databases (i.e., MEDLINE)

2. Private bibliographic databases (i.e., EMBASE)3. Specialized bibliographic databases (i.e.,

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)4. Manual or “hand searches” of references lists5. “Grey literature” -

http://www.slideshare.net/giustinid/libr534-class-vi-ib2

6. Web reports7. Experts

Page 13: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

To find databases...

1. Try program pages from the library: www.lib.uwo.ca/programs/

2. Consult your colleagues or your librarian:www.lib.uwo.ca/contact/instruction

Page 14: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Selecting sources

Where are we likely to find articles that answer the question: •Does hand washing prevent MRSA in the ICU?

Page 15: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Some places to search

Bibliographic Databases• Medicine

– PubMed (or Ovid MEDLINE)– EMBASE– Cochrane Library

• Multidisciplinary– Scopus– Web of Science

• Nursing and Allied Health– CINAHL– Proquest Nursing and Allied

Health Source

Web Sources• Associations (APHA) • Organizations (WHO)• Government (MOHLTC, Public

Health Agency of Canada)

Other• “Grey Literature”

– ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, conference proceedings (i.e., AMA), etc...

– BASE Search Engine

Page 16: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Choosing search terms

Page 17: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Breaking down your question

1. Select your database2. Break you question into concepts3. Identify subject headings for each concept4. Identify keywords for each concept

• Tips: – Use a “target article” to help identify search terms– Use a strategy worksheet to keep track of your terms:http://www.lib.uwo.ca/files/taylor/grad/Search_Strategy_Worksheet.pdf

Page 18: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Why do I have to select a database first?

Your database will determine:1. Your subject headings2. Your operators (i.e., truncation symbols)

Page 19: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Different databases have different subject headings

• Tips:– Complete a concept map for each database that you search– Select subject headings that are the closest match for your concept

(remember: systematic, explicit and reproducible)– Pay attention to “explode” commands – some databases will search related

headings by default, others will not

Database Subject Headings

Medline MeSH

EMBASE EMTREE

CINAHL CINAHL Headings

Cochrane Library MeSH

Web of Science N/A

Scopus N/A

Page 20: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Identifying concepts

Which concepts are contained in the question: Does hand washing prevent MRSA in the ICU?

1.Hand washing2.MRSA3.ICU4.Prevention

Page 21: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Concept #1

Sample Search Strategy

Concept #2 Concept #3

Subject Headings

Keywords

AND AND

OR

Hypertension [MeSH]+ Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 [MeSH]+ Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory [MeSH]

OR

OR

OR

OR

Hypertensi$.mp. (Diabetes mellitus adj5 (type 1 OR insulin?dependent OR juvenile?onset OR sudden?onset)).mp.

((blood pressure OR BP) adj2 (monitor$ OR test$) adj5 (home OR self OR ambulatory)).mp.

OR

((high OR elevated) adj2 (blood pressure OR BP)).mp.

Iddm.mp.

OR

OR

Page 22: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Some key operators in OvidOperator Command

$ Truncation (finds alternate endings)

? Wildcard (finds alternate spellings)

.mp. Mapping Alias (tells Ovid to search for your term in the Title, Abstract, Subject Headings, Table of Contents and Key Phrase Identifier fields) – useful for lit. reviews because it is broad

() Parentheses control the order of search operations

Adj Adjacency operator (can be followed by a number) tells Ovid terms must appear adjacent to one another

AND all terms must appear in results

OR any terms will appear in results

Note: These are recommended operators for research lit reviews. There are many, many more operators... Use Ovid‘s Help menu to locate them.

Or see: http://content.library.utoronto.ca/gerstein/subjectguides/ovidmedline_shortcuts.pdf

Page 23: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Does hand washing prevent MRSA in the ICU?

Hand washing MRSA ICU Prevention

Page 24: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Running your search

Page 25: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Running your search(es)• Start with your first concept

– Search for the subject headings first– Then search keywords– Combine these synonymous searches with OR using

your search history

• Repeat for your second, third, and subsequent concepts

• Finally, combine large search results set with AND

Page 26: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Running your search(es)

Search #2 =

Search #3 =

Search #4 =

Search #5 = #1 OR #2 OR #3 OR #4

Search #1 =

Concept 1

Search #6 =

Search #7 =

Search #8 =

Search #9 =

Concept 2

Search #10 = #6 OR #7 OR #8 OR #9

Search #11 = #5 AND #10

Results

Page 27: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Search Ovid MEDLINE

Page 28: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Applying practical & methodological screening criteria

Page 29: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Screening

• Two kinds: practical and methodological • Why?

– Use practical screening to identify a broad range of potentially useful studies

– Use methodological screening to identify the best available studies

Page 30: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Practical Screening Criteria – some examples

1. Date of publication – only studies conducted between 2005 and 2010

2. Participants of subjects – only children 6 to 12 years of age

3. Publication language – only materials written in English

4. Research design – only clinical trials

Page 31: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Methodological Screening Criteria - some questions to ask

• Is the study’s research design internally & externally valid?

• Are the data sources used in the study reliable & valid?

• Are the analytic methods appropriate? • Are the results meaningful in practical &

statistical terms?* *Fink, A. (2005). Conducting Research Literature Reviews. London: Sage.

Page 32: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Applying Screens (or limits)

• Apply practical screens by using “limits” (may also be called “search options”)

• Apply methodological screens by reading through the articles

Page 33: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Apply Practical Screens

• Add the following limit to your combined search result set: – Publication Year: 2000 - Current

Page 34: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Next steps

Page 35: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Moving to another source

• Retain as much of your original strategy as possible

• Recognize that subject headings will be different (or non-existent)

• Keep track of your search terms using a new concept map

Page 36: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Hand searching and final steps

• Locate the reference lists for selected articles*• Identify new articles that have cited your

articles*• Identify key journals and “hand search” their

issues• Test your search strategy by checking to see if a

few “target articles” appear in the results

* Use Web of Science or Scopus

Page 37: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Working with your results

• Export search results from each database or website into a citation manager (i.e., RefWorks)

• Remove duplicates• Remove inappropriate studies by applying

methodological screens

Page 38: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Synthesizing the results

Page 39: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Look for Patterns

• What conclusions did these studies reach? • Which studies agreed/disagreed with the

consensus?

• Consider using a synthesis matrix:www.ncsu.edu/tutorial_center/writespeak/download/Synthesis.pdf

Page 40: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Use your results to...

1. Describe current knowledge about your research topic

2. Support the need for and significance of new research

3. Explain research findings4. Describe the quality of a body of research*

*Fink, A. (2005). Conducting Research Literature Reviews. London: Sage.

Page 41: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Recap• Remember... research lit review is: systematic, explicit and reproducible• Select appropriate research question• Identify appropriate databases• Break your question into concepts• Identify synonyms and subject headings for each concept • Combine synonym searches with OR • Combine concept searches with AND• Apply practical and methodological screens• Send search results to a citation manager• Remove duplicates• Use your lit review to summarize knowledge, assess research and

support new research initiatives

Page 42: Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences

Questions

Robin FeatherstoneClinical Medicine [email protected]