List New2.ASP

Ex.No.07/15

16.04.2015

Pr: CounselforDH.

Ld.CounselforDHfiledanaffidavitoftheDHregardingnostayof

theproceedingsbyanyCourt.

IssueNoticeoftheapplicationtotheJDonPFfor06.05.2015.

(G.N.PANDEY)ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

CSNo.224/14

16.04.2015

Pr: Plaintiffinperson.

CounselfordefendantNo.1and2withdefendantsinperson.

Requestforadjournmentismadebyplaintifftoaddressargumentsas

hiscounselisbusyinHighCourtinsomeothermatterandisnotavailabletoday.

Requestnotopposed.Atrequest,putupforfinalargumentson16.05.2015.


Ex.08/15

16.04.2015

Pr: CounselforDHwithDHinperson.

JDinperson.

Itisjointlysubmittedonbehalfofpartiesthatmatterislikelytobe

settledandmaybereferredtoMediationCellforsettlement.Atjointrequestofthe

partiesmatterisreferredtoMediationCell,KKDCourtsforsettlement.Partiesare

directedtoappearbeforeMediationCell,KKDCourtforsettlementon20.04.2015

at02:00PM.

Put up before this Court for the outcome of the Mediation

Proceedingson05.05.2015.


CSNo.213/14

16.04.2015

Pr: Counselforplaintiffwithplaintiffinperson.

DefendantNo.1inperson.

Sh.RajKumarMittal,CounselfordefendantNo.2.

Affidavit of DW1 Sh. Rajesh Jain/defendant No. 1 filed. Copy

suppliedtothecounselforplaintiff.

PutupforDE/CrossexaminationofDW1on14.05.2015.


P07/14

16.04.2015

Pr: Counselforpetitioner.

CounselforrespondentNo.2.

CounselforrespondentNo.2seekssometimetofileobjections.Ld.

Counsel for petitioner alsoseeks some time to file correct deathcertificate of

deceasedSmt.BimlaDevi.

Atrequest,putupforthesameon08.05.2015.


CSNo.10/15

16.04.2015

Pr: Counselforplaintiff.

CounselfordefendantNo.1.

ReplicationtotheWSofdefendantNo.1filed.Copysupplied.

Asobserved,nonehasbeenappearingonbehalfofdefendantNo.2

norwrittenstatementhasbeenfiledonhisbehalf.DefendantNo.2isaccordingly

proceededexparte.

No document tendered on behalf of parties for admission/denial.

Pleading in this matter is complete. In view of the pleadings of the parties

followingissuesareframed:

(1)WhethertheplaintiffisentitledfordecreeofRs.4,82,529/alongwith

interestasprayedinthesuit?OPP

(2)Relief.

Nootherissuearisesnorpressedfromthepleadings.

Put up for PEbywayof affidavit withone weekadvance copy to the

counselfordefendantNo.1 on28.05.2015. Listofwitnessesbefiledby

theboththepartieswithinaweekandstepsbealsotakenforsummoning

thewitnesses,ifany,bytheplaintiffonPFanddietmoneyfordatefixed.

Boththepartiesareatlibertytofiletheoriginaldocumentsalongwithlist

ofdocumentswithinaweek.


CSNo.243/14

16.04.2015


Counselfordefendants.

ReplytotheapplicationU/OIXRule7r/wSection151ofCPCfiled

bytheplaintiff.Copysupplied.

ArgumentsontheapplicationU/OIXRule7r/wSection151ofCPC

heardandgonethroughtherecords.

At the outset, the reasons mentioned in the application by the

defendantsinsupportofcontentionsdonotinspireconfidenceasthelawyerwas

busyinsomeothercourtisnotagroundatall.Inthefactsandcircumstancesof

thecaseandinviewofthesubmissionsandintheinterestofjustice,todecidethe

controversyonmerit,onemoreopportunityisgrantedtothedefendantsand the

applicationU/OIXRule7CPCisallowedsubjecttocostofRs.5,000/tobepaidto

theplaintiff.Theproceduresarehandmadeofjusticeandnottodefeatthesame.No

prejudiceislikelytobecausedtotheplaintiffatall.Itisexpedientthatdefendantis

grantedopportunitytocontestthesuitsothatthematterisdecidedonmerits.Bothof

thewitnessesbecrossexaminedonthenextdateofhearingfailingwhichrightto

crossexaminethewitnessesshallbeautomaticallyclosed.

Putupforcrossexaminationofthewitnesseson15.05.2015.


CSNo.287/1416.04.2015


Counselfordefendant.

Finalargumentsheardatlength.

Videseparatejudgmentannouncedintheopencourttoday,suitof

theplaintiffisdecreedwithcost.

Decreesheetbedrawnaccordingly.

Filebeconsignedtorecordroom.

(G.N.Pandey)ADJ02NE,KKD16.04.2015

CSNo.108/14

16.04.2015

Pr: Appellantinperson.

CounselforrespondentNo.1.

CounselforrespondentNo.2and3.

RespondentNo.4inperson.

Finalargumentsheardatlength.

Writtensubmissionsonbehalfofpartiesalsofiled.

Putupforconsideration/orderon17.04.2015.


CSANo.412/14

16.04.2015

Pr: Counselforpetitioners.

Counselforrespondent.

Argument heard on the petition U/S 34 of the Arbitration and

ConciliationActforsettingasidetheawarddated25.07.2013.

Putupforconsideration/orderon17.04.2015.


MCANo.06/15

16.04.2015

Pr: Counselforappellant.

Noticeissuedtorespondentreceivedbackunservedwiththereport,

notavailableathome.

Counsel for appellant submits that respondent is intentionally

avoidingthesummons.

Counsel for appellant submits that other matter is pendingbefore

trialcourton29.04.15.

Issue notice of the appeal to respondent on filing of PF/RC for

05.05.15.Stepsbetakenwithintwodays.Dastibegiven.

Noticebeservedtorespondentbeforelearnedtrialcourton29.04.15.


CSNo.198/14

16.04.2015

Pr: Husbandofplaintiffinperson.


ThecaseisfixedbeforeHon'bleHighCourtofDelhion07.07.15as

statedandthiscourtisrestrainedforpassingfinaljudgmentinviewoforderdt.

11.03.15.

Beawaitedandputupforfurtherproceedingson13.07.15.

ReplyoftheapplicationU/o1Rule10CPCbealsofiledbyplaintiff

onnextdateofhearingwithadvancecopytocounselfordefendant/applicant.


ExNo.04/15

16.04.2015

StatementofSh.RahulGargs/oSh.MaheshChandGuptaR/o7/182,MainRoad

FarshBazar,Shahdara,Delhi32.

OnSA

IamDHinthepresentcaseandIhavereceivedasumofRs.20,00,000/

fromtheJDon09.04.15.Thedecreestandssatisfiedandexecutionpetitionbe

disposedoffaccordingly.

(RO&AC) (G.N.PANDEY)ADJ02(NE)/16.04.2015

ExNo.21/14

16.04.2015

Pr: NoneforDH.

SalaryoftheJDhasbeenattached.

Putupforfurtherproceedingson02.07.15.


ExNo.04/15

16.04.2015

Pr: DHinperson.

CounselforJD.

DHsubmitsthathehasreceivedasumofRs.20,00,000/fromthe

JDon09.04.15,decreestandssatisfiedandexecutionpetitionmaybedisposedoff

accordingly.

SeparatestatementofDHisrecordedtothiseffect.

InviewofstatementofDHandsubmissions,executionpetitionis

disposedoffaccordingly.Filebeconsignedtorecordroom.


CSNo.71/14

16.04.2015


Sh.HariShankar,Counselfordefendantwithdefendantinperson.

AffidavitofdefendantAshaisonrecordbutcounselfordefendant

submits that he does not want to examine witness namely Asha andwants to

examineotherwitnessnamelyDinesh.Hisrequestisaccepted.Defendant/witness

Ashaisdischargedunexamined.

One more opportunity is granted to defendant to examine other

witnessnamelyDineshwhoisonlywitnesstobeexaminedbythedefendantas

stated.

PutupforfilingofaffidavitofwitnessnamelyDineshwithoneweek

advancecopytocounselforplaintiffandcrossexaminationofdefendantaslast

opportunityon01.06.15.Dateisgivenatthejointrequest.


CSNo.166/14

16.04.2015

DW:1:Sh.Akshays/olateSh.RameshChanderBhardwajR/oH.No.1/11836,

PanchsheelGarden,NaveenShahdara,Delhi.

OnSA

ItendermyevidencebywayofaffidavitwhichisEx.DW1/1whichbears

my signature at pt. A and B. I also rely upon other document i.e. chain of

documentsareEx.DW1/A(collyOSR)andWillisEx.DW1/B(OSR)which

bearssignatureofmymotheratpt.AandB.

XXXXbyMs.BabitaSharma,counselforplaintiff.

Ihavestudiedupto10th class.IknowthecontentsofEx.DW1/1.The

signatureatpt.AandBofEx.DW1/1ismine.Ihadsignedatpt.AandBinthe

officeofmycounsel.Iampropertydealersince1997.Myfather(sinceexpired)

wasaGovt.teacherinVivekViharModelSchool.Heusedtoteachthestudentof

10thto12thclass.Icannottelltheincomeofmyfatherintheyear1994.Itcanbe

thathisincomemaybeRs.20,000/.Myfatherdidnotusetoprovidetuition.Itis

wrongtosuggestthatmyfatherusedtoprovidetuition.Itiswrongtosuggestthat

hewasearningmoneybyprovidingtuition.Myfatherhasbeenretiredprobablyin

19941995.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmyfatherretiredon30.09.94.Vol.hegot

retirementaftermymarriageinyear1995,afterIwasmarriedinyear1994.Ido

notknowwhathereceivedafterhisretirement.It iswrongtosuggestthatmy

fatherhadreceivedRs.8,00,000/afterhisretirement.Itiswrongtosuggestthat

entiremoneywaskeptwithmymother.Myfatherhasnotinvestedanymoneyin

anyshareoranythinginanymanner.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmyfatherhas

purchasedthesharesamountingtoRs.1,00,000/.Icannotadmit/denythatany

shareweregiventomymother.NoLICpolicywasinthenameofmyfather.Itis

wrong to suggest that my father was having LIC policy and its money was

receivedbymymother.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmyfatherhasinvestedincheat

fundcommittee.Itiswrongtosuggestthattheamountofthesamewasreceived

bymymother.Inmyknowledge,myfatherwasnothavinganysocietyflatin

Ghaziabad. It is wrong to suggest that my father was having society flat in

Ghaziabad.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmyfathertookmeandtheplaintifftogo

through the said flat. I do not remember as to what pension , myfather was

receivedafterretirement.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmyfatherwasreceivedthe

pensiontothetuneofRs.6,000/to7,000/permonth.Itiswrongtosuggestthat

mymotherwasreceivedthepensionofmyfatherafterhisdeathtothetuneofRs.

10,000/permonth. It is wrongtosuggest that mymotherwashavingacash

amountofRs.25,00,000/atthetimeofdeathofmyfather.Ihavefivematernal

uncle(Mama)andoneMaternalaunt(Mausi). All ofmymaternalunclewere

residing in Shahdara itself in 1996. Theyall were residing in the samehouse

which was measuring about 233 Sq. yards, built up to ground, first and half

portionuponit.Sevenroomswereatthegroundfloor.Itiswrongtosuggestthat

therewereonlyfiveroomsingroundfloor.Itiswrongtosuggestthattherewasno

kitchenonthegroundfloor.Itiswrongtosuggestthatkitchenwasarrangedby

my maternal uncles in the room itself. In 1996, there was a common latrine

bathroomonthegroundfloor.Therewasadrawingroomandthreebedroomin

thefirstfloor.Itiswrongtosuggestthatthereweretworoomonthefirstfloorand

onlylatrinebathroom.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmymaternaluncleswerenot

havingsufficientspacetoliveinyear1996.Mymaternaluncleswereearningwell

andhavegoodfinancialstatus.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmyfatherhashelpedmy

maternalunclesinthemarriageoftheirchildren.Myfatherwasnotowinganyflat

inDilshadGardenhoweverwewerelivingonrent.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmy

fatherwasowinganyflatinDilshadGardenandhesoldthesameforasumofRs.

6,50,000/.MyfatherwasnotowinganypropertyinJhilmil,Shahdara,opposite

Govt.Schoolwheremyfatherwasearlierteaching.Itiswrongtosuggestthat

after disposing the property of Jhilmil, my father purchased any property in

VishwasNagarbearingH.No.4/82.Itiswrongtosuggestthatafterdisposingthe

propertyofVishwasNagar,myfatherpurchasedpropertyinDilshadGarden.Itis

wrongtosuggestthataftertwomonths,thepropertyofDilshadGardenwassold

andthepropertyofnaveenShahdarawaspurchasedforasumofRs.7,25,000/.

TheflatinwhichwewereresidingatfirstflooronrentatDilshadGarden,in

whichtherewerethreerooms.Itiswrongtosuggestthatthepremisesinwhichwe

wereresidingcouldnotbedistributedintwoparts.Itiswrongtosuggestthatthe

property of Shahdra was purchased by my father with the sole motive to get

divided the same between two brothers. The house in Naveen Shahdars is

constructeduptogroundfloorandoneroomthereupon.Itiscorrectthatthereare

tworoomsonthegroundfloorandoneroomthereupon.Itiswrongtosuggestthat

atthetimeofthepurchaseofpropertyinNaveenShahdara,mymotherdivided

equallybetweenbothbrothers.Mymotherwasoperatingabankaccount.Idonot

remembertheaccountnumber.Icannotadmit/denywhethertheaccountNo.is

1424inSBIBranch,DilshadGarden.Mymotherwasnothavinganylockerinany

bank.ItiswrongtosuggestthatmymotherandfatherwerehavinglockerinUCO

bank,ConnaughtplacevideNo.255.Itiscorrectthatmymotherusedtoreceive

pensioninherbankaccountinSBIbutIcannottellwhetheritwasaccountno.

1424orother.sometimemymotheraloneusedtogotooperatetheaccountorat

othertime,shewasaccompaniedbymeormybrothers.Itiswrongtosuggestthat

neithermymotherusedtogoalonenorboththebrothers.Itiswrongtosuggest

thatmybrotherwasdrugaddictandwasinpositiontoaccompanymymother.Itis

wrongtosuggestthatplaintiffusedtoaccompanymymotherforoperatingthe

bankaccount.Ihadseenmymothersigninginthebank.Mymotherusedtosine

bythenameofUrmil.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmymotherusedtosignbythe

nameofUrmilaBhardwaj.IcannotproduceanyotherdocumentbesideEx.DW1/

BatpresentwhichbearsthesignaturebythenameofUrmil.Itiswrongtosuggest

thattheplaintiffusedtoaccompanymymotherforoperatingthelockerofUCO

bankinCPorthatsheusedtosignbythenameofUrmilaBhardwaj.Itiswrongto

suggestthatmymotherwasnothavinganyfaithinmeandmybrotherandhence

sheusedtotaketheplaintiffwithher.Mymotherusedtogivecashmoneyfor

depositingtheelectricityandwatercharges.Iormymotherusedtogoforthesaid

purpose.Itiswrongtosuggestthatneithermenormymotherusedtogoforsaid

purpose.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmymotherdidnotusetogoanywherealone.It

is wrong to suggest that mymother used to give the cheques to plaintiff for

depositingelectricityandwaterchargesandthosechequesusedtobesignedbyin

thenameofUrmilaBhardwaj.Itiswrongtosuggestthatatthetimeofwithdrawal

ofmoneyfromthelocker,mymotherwasaccompaniedbytheplaintiff,orthat

shesignedtherebythenameofUrmilaBhardwaj. It is wrongtosuggest that

plaintiffservedmymothertillsheresideduptoyear2005.Mymaternaluncles

usedtoresideinShahdarainyear2007.Thedistancebetweenthehouseofmy

maternalunclesandofuswasaboutfiveminutesofwalkingdistance.IknowAnil

Tyagiforlast1820years.ItiswrongtosuggestthatIamnotknowingAnilTyagi

since1820years.AsfarasIknow,Sh.AnilTyagiisresidingtheresincelast

3034years.Webothareknowtoeachotherbeingtheneighbourers.mymotheris

familierwithSh.AnilTyagisincethetime,Iknowhim.Itiswrongtosuggest

thatmymotherdidnotusetolikeSh.AnilTyaginorsheusedtolikemysitting

withhim.ThehouseofSh.AnilTyagiisoppositetoourhouse.Itiswrongto

suggestthatAnilTyagiwashavingbadhabitsandduetothisreason,motherof

mineandmotherofAnilTyagiwasagainsthim.YogeshGosaiismybrotherin

lawandisresidinginChandanNagarwhichisatthedistanceofhour.The

executionofEx.DW1/Bdt. 05.06.07wasintheknowledgeofmymaternal

uncle.Myuncleswerenotatmyhomeatthattime.Icannotsayastowhymy

motherhasnotcalledmyunclesatthetimeexecutionofwill.TheWillEx.DW

1/BwasdraftedandexecutedbymymotherinKKDCourts.Mymotherhasnot

calledanybodyfromherparentalside.ItiswrongtosuggestthatEx.DW1/Bwas

hasbeenforgedbymeinconnivanceofSh.AnilTyagiandYogeshGosaiand

hencenobodycamefromtheparentalsideofmymother.Myallmaternaluncles

helpedmymother to purchase thepropertyofwhichdocumentEx. DW1/A

(colly).Icannottellwhichmaternalunclehelpedofwhatamount.Itiswrongto

suggestthatnoneofmymaternalunclehelpedmymotherforpurchasingofsaid

property.Ialongwithmyfamilyisresidinginthesaidpropertyatgroundandfirst

floor.Ms.Rashmi,thedaughterofplaintiffwasmarriedinyear2010.Rashmiis

residinginhermatrimonialhome.I cannottell theaddressofhermatrimonial

home.Sheisonthevisitingtermswithus.Idonottrytoknowheraddress.Itis

wrongtosuggestthatIamdeposingfalselyinthisregard.Ms.Rashmiisnotin

possessionofthepropertyatNaveenShahdara.Shehasnotdemandedhershareas

perEx.DW1/B.Asperwill, Ms.Rashmiisentitledforher1/3th share.Itis

wrongtosuggestthatIdidnotwantgiveshareofMs.Rashmi.Itiswrongto

suggestthatwillhasbeenpreparedastheplaintiffcouldnotgethershare.Itis

wrongtosuggestthatafterthedeathofmymother,meandmybrothershaveequal

share.Itiswrongtosuggestthatafterthedeathofmybrother,plaintiffandher

daughterisentitledfortheirshare.Itiscorrectthatafterthedeathoffather,my

motherusedtoconsultwithmymaternaluncleonimportantissues.Icannotgive

anyreasonastowhyshedidnotcallherbrotherstowitnessontheWillandthere

weregoodrelationbetweenthem.Itiscorrectthatmyfatherusedtobearexpenses

ofeducationofdaughterofplaintiffandhermaintenance.Itiswrongtosuggest

thatmyfatherhadarrangedmoneyforthemarriageofRashmipriortohisdeath.

ItiswrongtosuggestthatRashmiwasdoingthejobsince2005to2010,priorto

hermarriageandwasearninghandsomeamount.ItiswrongtosuggestthatMs.

Rashmiusedtobearherentireexpensesandalsosavedmoneyforhermarriage.It

is wrong to suggest that Ms. Neelamhas left her jwellary when she left her

matrimonialhomeinyear2005.Itiswrongtosuggestthatherjwellarywasleft

withmymother.ItiswrongtosuggestthatthesaidjwellarywasgiventoMs.

Rashmiinhermarriagebyme.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmybrotherusedtobeat

theplaintiffafterconsumingdrugsandhenceshewasunabletoresidewithhim.It

iswrongtosuggestthatmymotherwasnothavinganyrighttoexecuteEx.DW1/

B.

FurthercrossexaminationofDW1isdeferred.


CSNo.26/15

16.04.2015


Freshvakalatnamafiledonbehalfofplaintiff.Itbetakenonrecord.

Counsel for plaintiff submits that matter is likely to be settled

betweentheparties.

Atrequest,putupforsettlementifanyon30.05.15.


CSNo.334/14

16.04.2015

DW:1:StatementofSh.Bobby@BhupeshS/oShHarishChand(recalledfor

crossexamination)

OnSA

XXXXbySh.RohitArora,counselforplaintiffs.

Iacquaintedwiththeplaintiffforthelast45years.Myaffidavitwasready

byme.Vol.myaffidavitwasreadybymyAdvocateundermyinstructions.Iam

awarewiththecontentsofmyaffidavit.Theaffidavitwaspreparedinthechamber

ofmycounselandwassignedbeforetheOathcommissioner.DefendantNo.2is

mywife.ItiscorrectthatmywifehadfiledonecomplaintatPSJyotiNagaron

18.06.12whereshehadlevelledanallegationagainsttheplaintiffNo.1and2that

theyhadkidnappedme.Itiswrongtosuggestthatmywifehadfiledfalseand

frivolouscomplaintagainstplaintiffNo.1and2becausetheywereaskingfortheir

moneywhichtheyhadgiventome.MymobileNo.8744990775.Iamusingthe

sameforthelasttwoyears.Beforethis,Iwasusingthisnumber9953531093.I

alsousedthisnumber9997255943.Vol.butIdonotremembertheexactnumber.

IdonotknowAmarSingh.ItiswrongtosuggestthatAmarsinghismymaternal

uncleofplaintiffsandIknowhimasIcalledhimontelephone.Idonotknow

RahulSaxena.Vol.MightbeIknowhimbyface.Intheyear2012,Iwentto

Kashipurforsomework,howeverearlierIdidnotinformmyfamilymembers

about the samebut after 67 days, I informed my family members about my

whereabouts.ItiswrongtosuggestthatIwasnotgonetoKashipurandIwasin

Delhihoweverinordertoputpressureupontheplaintiffs,Ialongwithmyfamily

membersfiledthefalseandfrivolouscomplaintagainstthemsothattheywould

notaskfortheirmoney.Idonotrememberthestatusofthecomplaintfiledbymy

wifeatPSJyotiNagar.Idonotrememberwhethermywifehadfollowedupthe

proceedingsofthesaidcomplaint.Idonotknowwhymywifefiledthecomplaint

against the plaintiff alleging that they had kidnapped me. Vol. ASsuch, the

plaintiffscametomyhouseandIwentagainwiththemandthatiswhy,therewas

amiscommunicationaboutofwhichmywifemighthavemadethesaidcomplaint.

Iamdoingjob.EarlierIwasdoingbusinesswithmyfather.Iamdoingjobforthe

yearthreeyearsasasalesmaninStoln.Itiswrongtosuggestthatintheyear2012,

IrequestedtheplaintiffsforsumofRs.2,50,000/asIsufferedfinancelossinmy

business.ItiswrongtosuggestthatIusedtogetfinancialhelpfromtheplaintiff

sometimetotime.ItiswrongtosuggestthatIamdeposingfalsely.


CSNo.166/14

16.04.2015

Pr: Ms.BabitaSharma,counselforplaintiff.

CounselfordefendantwithDW1.

DW1 examined, partly cross examined and discharged. Further

crossexaminationofDW1isdeferredatrequest.

EvidencebywayofaffidavitofAnilTyagifiled.Copysupplied.

Put up for further cross examination of DW1 and remaining

defendantevidenceon12.05.15.


CSNo.334/14

16.04.2015

Pr: Sh.RohitArora,counselforplaintiff.

Sh.H.P.Rao,CounselfordefendantwithDW1.

DW1crossexaminedanddischarged.

Counselfordefendantsubmitsthatnootherwitnessremainstobe

examinedthereforedefendantevidencemaybeclosed.

Inviewofsubmissionsmadebycounselfordefendant,defendant

evidencestandsclosed.

Putupforfinalargumentson02.05.15.


CSNo.35/15

16.04.2015

Pr: Proxycounselforplaintiff.

Atrequest,putupforconsiderationon20.04.15.


CSNo.147/14

16.04.2015



Atthejointrequest,putupforfinalargumentson17.04.15at2PM.


CSNo.26/14

16.04.2015

Pr: CounselforDH.

NoneforJD.

Sh.KamalKumarPandey,Advocate/courtauctioneer.

In response to the court notice, Sh. Kamal Kumar Pandey,

Advocate /court auctioneer appointed by the Honble HighCourt of Delhi for

karkardoomaCourtsispresentinperson.

On08.01.15,thesuitpropertyi.e.shopbearingNo.11and12,DDA

Market, B1NearDTCBusStandNo.212,NandNagri, Delhi93andH.No.

B1/303,NandNagri,Delhi93wasattachedandattachmentwarrantsinrespectof

suit property was issued. The suit property was attached in viewof order dt.

08.01.15andprayerismadeforauctionofthesuitpropertyforsatisfactionofthe

decree.DHhasprayedforfixingthedateforproclamationofthesaleofthesuit

property.Requestisallowed.

Issuewarrantsofproclamationofthesalebywayofauctionofthe

suitpropertyi.e.shopbearingNo.11and12,DDAMarket,B1NearDTCBus

StandNo.212,NandNagri,Delhi93andH.No.B1/303,NandNagri,Delhi93

tobeaffixedonthecourtdooronfilingofPFfor05.05.15.Proclamationofthe

salebemadebybeatofdrumsondepositingofnecessarychargeswhichshallbe

heldon05.05.15andspotvisitbythelearnedcourtauctioneeronthesamedayi.e

05.05.15ondepositingthenecessarycharges.Theauctionwillbeheldatthesite

bythelearnedcourtauctioneeron30.05.15.Auctionbeconductedasperrulesand

reportbefurnishedtothiscourton02.06.15.Copyofthisorderbegivendastito

counselforDHaswellascourtauctioneer.

SHO of the concerned PS is directed to render all the possible

assistancetothelearnedcourtauctioneerincarryingouttheorderofthiscourt.

Sh.KamalKumarPandeyisappointedasthecourtauctioneerfor

carryingout the auctionproceedings inviewof appointmentbyHonbleHigh

CourtofDelhiforKKDcourts.

Since this court has appointed a court auctioneer, it will be

appropriateiftheauctioneerisentrustedwiththetaskofpublicationtobeeffected

inthenewspaperStatesmen.

Thefeeoftheauctioneerisfixedat2%oftheauctionamount.DHis

directed to deposit Rs. 10,000/ on account with the court auctioneer for the

purposeofmeetingtheexpensesinrelationtocarryingoutpublicnoticeinthe

newspaper.

Listthematterforcomplianceon02.06.15.


ExNo.09/15

16.04.2015

Pr: CounselforDH.

Atrequest,putupforwithdrawingofthepetitionon27.04.15.


CSNo.435/14

16.04.2015

FiletakenuptodayonanapplicationfiledfiledbyplaintiffU/o9Rule9

CPC.

Pr: Counselforapplicant.

Heard.

IssuenoticeoftheapplicationtodefendantonfilingofPF/RCfor

14.05.15.Stepsbetakenwithinaweek.


CSNo.55/14

16.04.2015



NewlyImpleadeddefendantNo.4inperson.

Inthiscase,issuehasalreadybeenframedandPW/plaintiffhasbeen

crossexaminedbydefendantNo.1to3.

Evidencebywayofaffidavitofplaintifffiled.Copysupplied.

Put up for cross examination of plaintiff and remaining PE on

16.05.15.


KishanLalV/sAshishPathak

16.04.2015

Freshsuitreceivedbywayofassignment.Itbecheckedandregistered.

Pr: Proxycounselforplaintiff.

Atrequest,putupforconsiderationon17.04.15.


CSNo.446/14

16.04.2015

FiletakenuptodayonanapplicationU/o39Rule2AofCPCfiledby

plaintiff.

Pr: Counselforapplicant.

Heard.

IssuenoticeoftheapplicationtodefendantonfilingofPF/RCfor

datealreadyfixed.Stepsbetakenwithintwodays.


CSNo.469/14

16.04.2015


EvidencebywayofaffidavitofPWalongwithaffidavitU/s65Bof

theIndianEvidenceAct,1872filed.

Putupforexparteevidenceon16.05.15.


CSNo.372/14

16.04.2015

Pr: Plaintiffinpersonwithcounsel.

Nonefordefendantsincemorningdespiterepeatedcalls.

Itisalready2:10PM,fourthcallsincemorning.

ThecaseisfixedforcrossexaminationofPWbutnonehasappeared

onbehalfofdefendantsincemorningtocrossexaminethewitness.

Inviewofabovesaidfactsandcircumstances,defendantisproceeded

exparteandrighttocrossexaminethePWbydefendantisclosed.

PutupforremainingPEon08.05.15.


List New2.ASP

Documents

Transcript of List New2.ASP