Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos
-
Upload
pkconference -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
60 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos
![Page 1: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Liquidity-Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos: An Harrodian Circuit of Capital ModelXiao Jiang
Denison University
![Page 2: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
GDP Growth Rate, USA
![Page 3: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Modified Circuit of Capital Model
Productive /
Commercial
Capital (X)
Central Bank Financial
Capital (M)
C Capital
Outlays
Sales
Lending
Borrowing
Interest
Payments
![Page 4: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Firm’s Behavior1. Making the investment decision. A financially-extended
Harrodian investment function that depends on: the firm’s liquidity ratio (m=M/X), and the difference between the on-going uniform interest rate (i) and this firm’s profit rate (r).
2. The capital outlays of one firm are the sales of some other firms. As soon as new capital outlays are determined, new sales are determined as long as we know the distribution of the capital outlays to sales – we call it Matrix A
Ci,t+1 =Ci,t + a[mi,t, it - ri,t ]Ci,t
Cm > 0,Ci-r < 0
S = A ×C
![Page 5: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
4. Capital outlays increases productive capital and sales (profit discounted) reduces productive capital.
5. Capital outlays reduces financial capital and sales increases financial capital.
6. Profit rate is configured given sale, productive capital, and profit margin.
7. The central bank determines the interest rate for next round of interaction, the circuit closes for this particular round.
Xi,t+1 = Xi,t +Ci,t+1 - Si,t+1 ×(1- qi )
Mi,t+1 = (Mi,t -Ci,t+1 + Si,t+1)×(1+ i)
ri,t+1 = (qi ×Si,t+1) / Xi,t+1 = qui,t+1
it+1 = f[mt ], im < 0
![Page 6: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The case of identical firms
• We make a hard assumption about the relation between capital outlays and sales…
• Firms receive equal proportions of capital outlay from each individual firm.
• In the end, we have C = S for each firm, that is, firms accumulate financial capital at the same rate.
• All firms are identical
A =
0 13
13
13
13
0 13
13
13
13
0 13
13
13
13
0
é
ë
êêêêê
ù
û
úúúúú
![Page 7: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Profit Rate Simulation
0 100 200 300 400 500Time
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
r
![Page 8: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Liquidity-Profit Rate Simulation
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
m
r
![Page 9: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Liquidity-Profit Rate Cycle
Low r -> higher lending -> higher m -> r
Too high of r chokes m off
Low m -> high I -> Shortage of Finance
r falls enough below i -> Recovery of liquidity
![Page 10: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Implications• This model produces cycles and fluctuations endogenously.
• Via stability and bifurcation analyses, the source of the instability of the system is found be the size of a crucial parameter:
• This parameter is a(i-r): The marginal propensity to invest with respect to interest and profit rates differential.
• Larger the |a(i-r)| is, more aggressive the firm is with its investment in financial products.
• The system goes through Hopf bifurcation precisely when ap becomes large enough.
• The high |a(i-r) | is essentially the Harrodian instability in this model.
• However, the resulting exploding trajectory of accumulation is contained by the negative effect of liquidity constraint and interest rate.
![Page 11: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The case of heterogeneous firms• Relax the assumption that all firms receive equal proportion
of capital outlays from each firm as their sales.
0 0.85 0.75 0.05
0.20 0 0.45 0.03
0.54 0.10 0 0.92
0.26 0.04 0.47 0
é
ë
êêêê
ù
û
úúúú
Col[A] = {1,1,1,1}
Row[A] = {0.98,0.68,1.56,0.78}
Ci ¹ Si
Firms accumulate financial capital at different ratesFirms become heterogeous
![Page 12: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The Principal Eigenvectors
• Gibrat (1931), Cabral and Mata (2003), Simon and Bonnini (1958), Ijiriand Simon (1965)
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
5
10
15
![Page 13: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Profit Rate
100 200 300 400 500Time
0.096
0.098
0.100
0.102
0.104
0.106
r
![Page 14: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Liquidity-Profit Rate
0.095 0.100 0.105 0.110r
0.160
0.165
0.170
0.175
0.180
m
![Page 15: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
GDP Growth Rate
GDPt = kCt-1 + qSt
200 400 600 800Ticks
0.100
0.105
0.110
0.115
0.120
0.125
Rate of Growth
![Page 16: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Individual Profit Rates
100 200 300 400
0.09
0.10
0.11
0.12
![Page 17: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Is there an equilibrium for this system?
![Page 18: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Average and Equilibrium Growth Rates of Productive Capital
![Page 19: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Evolution of Firm Size Distribution Measured in X
![Page 20: Liquidity Profit Rate Cycles and Chaos](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042816/5598662b1a28abce2f8b478e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Implications
• The instability of this “capitalist economy” lies in the Harrodian instability caused by the firm’s “aggressiveness” regarding the size of the “rent” between investment in the financial market and the goods market.
• The chaotic fluctuations in the case of heterogeneous firms are caused by some sort of mis-coordination between different firms.
• The existence of chaotic movement might suggest a basic social coordination problem. With such a closed monetary system, one firm’s spending has the external effect of relieving other firms’ financial constraints, and no firm has a reason to take these external effects into account in choosing its own spending.