Limitation of Liability in IM/IT Contracting Background, Current Situation & Industry Concerns...
-
Upload
piers-franklin -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Limitation of Liability in IM/IT Contracting Background, Current Situation & Industry Concerns...
1
Limitation of Liability in IM/IT ContractingBackground, Current Situation & Industry Concerns
Presentation to SSC Procurement Benchmarking Committee
Sharon Chamberlain
July 4, 2013
2
Presentation Goal
T0 provide the background on the genesis of the PWGSC Acquisitions Branch Framework for LOL in IM/IT Contracting and Outline the Current Situation
Key Areas•Genesis of PWGSC Acquisitions Branch
Framework and the Core Elements•Current Situation, SSC’s Approach &
Industry Concerns• ITAC’s Request
3
PWGSC Treatment of Liabilities #1 ITAC concern
Genesis of PWGSC IM/IT Framework Timeline
PWGSC IT BranchQuest & Due Diligence On ITAC Concern
2000-2012
Again #1 ITAC Concern asSSC UndertakesEnterprise Procurement
25 years prior2000- 2003
2012-2013
HarmonyTBS Policy & PWGSC Special Authority = Workable Foundation for PWGSC Acquisitions Branch Framework, with Refinements
Sep
tem
ber
1, 2
00
3 SSC RFP’s
4
GoC Due Diligence for Solution Development (2000 to 2003)
• Rigorous PWGSC Review Consultations with Industry – Small
Industry/PWGSC Working Group Nature of IT History of Occurrences PWGSC funded Risk Study by Leading
Software Industry PWGSC funded Study on Insurance Availability In-depth Review of Options PWGSC Business and Legal Review PWGSC IT Acquisitions wrote TB submission
for exception Developed risk models and accompanying
standard clause and process to be used with clients
• Rigorous TBS Policy Work Joint PWGSC and TBS Work to find
an overarching policy approach TBS funded a review by a professor
emeritus on risk and public policy Close collaboration with TBS on
PWGSC TB submission for exception
TBS wrote Policy on Decision Making in Limiting Contractor Liability in Crown Procurement contracts
Contiguous work to develop the new overarching TBS Policy & a Special Authority to allow an exception for am area of special, indirect and consequential damages of third parties promulgated concurrently to TB Minsters Outcome: Approved in 2003
ITAC Communications at Political Levels on Criticality of Addressing their #1 Issue for the past 25 years
5
TBS Policy “Decision Making in Limiting Contractor Liability in Crown Procurement Contracts”• Key thrusts
• Protection of the Crown• Contractor responsibility• Exceptional transfer of risk (TB exception for IM/IT
procurement)• Risk based implementation (Four models see below)
• Four models for liability• Model 1: Standard commercial or military products and services
… commonly available in the marketplace• Model 2: Complex developmental products, services and
construction contracts• Model 3: Contracts where there is limited scope for negotiating
liability provisions, … where no other viable alternative to serve a program requirement exists
• Model 4: Highly specialized services contracts in support of assuring the health, safety and economic well being of Canadians
6
PWGSC Developed Risk Assessments for IM/IT Standard Groupings
• PWGSC IT Acquisitions Branch in concert with clients developed standard model 1 commodity/service risk assessments• Desktop products• Software• Telecom services• IT Professional services• Others
• Other Models – Used as Applicable, some interpretation required
7
Current Situation & ITAC ConcernsEnvironmental Changes ITAC Concerns
• SSC enterprise procurement approach for IT architecture
• SSC revisit of LOL on a file by file basis ▫ Sometimes adopts former PWGSC
IT LOL framework unchanged▫ Other times SSC business and
SSC procurement perform new risk assessment and set limits and clauses for file
• ITAC understands the SSC rationale is: ▫ SSC considers enterprise
approach as having unique considerations
▫ SSC wants to ensure full accountability of the successful suppliers
• SSC positions on “Other times” risk assessments causing major concerns for ITAC members
• ITAC ‘s #1 problem as under Corporate Governance rules, officers cannot accept liability requirements that:
Create risks well beyond commercial limits
Cannot be demonstrated to be a genuine pre-estimate of actual damages
Create liability for events/requirements beyond those they have agreed to meet
8
ITAC Request – Some QuestionsReevaluate PWGSC Acquisitions Branch IT LOL frameworks in context of SSC procurement strategies & goals
• Considerations for SSC• Still buying standard commercial products and
services• Software based solutions where bugs are
inherent• Best commercial pricing (even lower)• Greater transparency when deviating from
established PWGSC IT contracting frameworks• Is deviating required and warranted?
Impacts?• Are higher than normal “industry standard”
commercial LOL limits impacting competition, pricing? etc.
• Do higher than normal LOL limits afford SSC greater accountability from suppliers? incent better behaviour?
• How does this lever fit within an overall contract performance management framework?
9
The ITAC ASK
ITAC requests that SSC:• Set up a joint government
(SSC,TBS,PWGSC)/Industry Working Group
• In the interim, continue with the PWGSC SACC clause
• End goal • to establish a regularized and
standardized LOL approach akin to the current SACC Manual clause
10