Lighting Retrofit Project Case Study October 2012, Sumner...
Transcript of Lighting Retrofit Project Case Study October 2012, Sumner...
Lighting Retrofit Project Case StudyOctober 2012, Sumner Distribution Center
Case Study Series
Executive Summary
The Mission Produce Lighting Retrofit Project was designed to implement all qualified LED solutions while realizing maximum financial savings for the client. 93% of the project was retrofitted with LED products while the 7% was replaced with better performing fluorescent technology. Rather than a high cost central control system, localized controls were implemented to maximize the energy savings. This project created 79% energy savings from the previous lighting design & achieved a superior lighting environment for all worker activities. Simple payback based on electricity alone is 1.4 years and if the additional savings from maintenance, tax deduction benefit & cooling load reduction are considered, the actual payback is expected to be within one year from the date of project completion.
Project IntroductionThere are three main parts to this project:
PART I: ! Refrigerated Warehouse - 48 units of 400W Metal Halide High Bays were ! ! ! ! replaced with 160W LED High Bay with localized controls.
PART II:! Office Area - Task Ambient Lighting Strategy was implemented to create energy saving while ! ! improving worker productivity in the office areas while restrooms and storage rooms ! ! were retrofitted with LED low bay fixtures with motion sensor. All fixtures were controlled with ! ! daylight harvesting, dimming, timers and/or occupancy sensors.
PART III:! Due to high humidity, the current T5HO vapor tight fixtures were left in place and relamped ! with low watt T5HO’s, maintaining light levels and increasing efficiency by approximately 10%.
! ! This case study doesn’t cover the T5HO installation.! !
Sumner Distribution Center
2
Case Study Series
PART II:Office Area
PART I:Refrigerated Warehouse
PART IIIRipe Rooms
1.0 Refrigerated Warehouse
Model 400W MH
Power Usage
*Refrigerated Space Interaction Factor(Where Applicable)
Total Power Per Unit
Number of Units
Color Rendering Index
455W
1.2
546W
48
65
Model LUNA 160
Power Usage
Controls Savings
Total Power Per Unit
Savings Per Unit
Number of Units
Color Rendering Index
160W
Average of 46%
86W
Up to 460W(84% Maximum)
48
83
Much of the light is lost before reaching the task area and lacks uniformity.
400W MH LUNA 160
Impressive uniformity with maximum illumination of work areas with minimal glare.
3
Case Study Series
1.1 Visual Observations After Retrofit
Quadrupled Light-level on Task Areas
Better Vertical Uniformity & Less Contrast
Glare-Free Optical Design
No-glass breakage concerns & no Mercury
Improved Color Rendering Index
Utility Rebate Eligibility Design Lights Consortium Qualified Product for maximum eligibility
IES Footcandle Recommendation Before retrofit light level was at 20 FC(Meets IES Recommendation for medium active application). After retrofit light levels are measured between 90 - 120 FC.
Productivity Improvement Higher efficiency is expected in all applications with superior lighting environment. Old lights had the restrike time of 15 minutes for employees to turn the lights on.
O&M Saving Controlled LED in a refrigerated environment is expected to last longer. For this application, 70,000+ hours/L70 expectation is projected.
EPACT 2005 Tax Benefit Eligible to receive commercial lighting tax deduction benefit.
No More 1000W Halogen Work Lights
Uniform Distribution on the Ground Level
Superior Heat Sink DesignMinimal heat creation to achieve dramatic cooling load reduction
4
Case Study Series
Every Lighting Fixture was integrated into a controls strategy for the Mission
LED Retrofit Project
1.2 Controls Integration
Zone based occupancy control was designed into the project by Rick Allen, who is the principal of Energywise. Since LUNA 160 was able to deliver twice as many footcandles than before with just half of the units turned on, Rick limited the auto-on feature to only 50% of the installed high bays in areas where coverage was appropriate. This strategy was applied to 46% of the fixtures and saved an additional 24% annual kWh. This still met the most aggressive IES recommendation for warehouse activities. However, since Mission Produce requires higher light level for certain activities, he wired the remaining units to a timer switch so the maximum usage of the lighting will be limited to applicable activities only.
“The significance of the Mission project is that all areas and all fixtures are effectively controlled using a variety of technologies and strategies to insure maximum energy efficiency without compromising employee safety and productivity” ! ! Rick Allen, Energywise
“Definitely better lighting for productivity, safety, cleaning & inspection.”
Zura Goodpaster, Distribution Center Manager
5
Case Study Series
Ambient Model GP300TK45W
Power Usage
Controls Savings
Actual Usage Per Unit
45W
30%
31.5W
Task Lighting Model TL-4300
Task Lighting Usage
Total Usage
Saving %
New LPD
Ambient Light Level
Task Lighting Level
8.5
40W
85%
0.23W/SF
Average of 25 FC
50 - 100FC
Model 3-F32T8
Power Per Unit
Number of Units
LPD
Total Usage Per Office
Controls
Task Lighting
Lighting Design Strategy
Glare Control
Ambient Light Level
90W
2
1.2 W/SF
180W
None
N/A
None
None
40 - 50 FC on Task Level across the whole area
180 WattsSerious Glare Issue
40 WattsErgonomic Lighting
2.0 OfficeAwarded by NGL 2012(www.ngldc.org), the first CCT tunable LED troffer, GP300TK45W and Commercial Energy Star Certified Prism TL-4300 implements the Task Ambient Lighting Strategy.
3-F32T8Prismatic Troffer
25FC60FC
50FC 50FC
*Each of the office area has different level of demand savings. Above comparison was made based on the task ambient lighting model that was implemented for the private office application.
6
Case Study Series
2.1 Visual Observations After Retrofit
Two 3L-F32T8 Troffers Replaced with One LED 2x2 Troffer
Photosensor controlled Ambient Lighting for Lobby with Daylight
50-100FC Task Lighting is Provided by TL-4300
Utility Rebate Eligibility Energy Star & DLC Qualified Product for maximum eligibility
IES Footcandle Recommendation Meets the code with superior user experience
Productivity Improvement Higher efficiency is expected in all applications with superior lighting quality
O&M Saving No maintenance is expected over next 10 years(5 Year Warranty).
EPACT 2005 Tax Benefit Eligible to receive commercial lighting tax deduction benefit.
3000K 4000K 5000K
Multiple Custom Mood Settings for Conference Rooms
25FC Ambience at Task Level Minimizes Glare on Monitor Screens
User friendly touch control panel for CCT tuning & dimming
7
Case Study Series
3.0 Restroom3 restrooms were retrofitted with A2W4-0445 and wall mounted occupancy control unit.
Utility Rebate Eligibility Energy Star & DLC Qualified Product for maximum eligibility on LED solutions.
IES Footcandle Recommendation Meets the code with superior user experience
O&M Saving No maintenance is expected over next 15+years on LED applications(5 Year Warranty).
EPACT 2005 Tax Benefit Qualified under the building area method.
Model 2-F32T8
Power Usage
Controls
Total Power Per Unit
Number of Units
Color Rendering Index
CCT
59W
None
59W
3
80
3500K
Model A2W4-0445
Power Usage
Controls Savings
Total Power Per Unit
Savings Per Unit
Number of Units
Color Rendering Index
CCT
46W
30%
32W
27W
3
86
4500K
2-F32T8 1x4 Wraparound A2W4-0445
Surface mounted A2W4-0445 brings crisp illumination with instant on feature
Chain or pendant mounting options are also available for utility lighting applications.
8
Case Study Series
Project Analysis
Simple Payback Based on Energy Savings
Overall Energy Savings
Estimated Annual Energy Savings
Applied Rebate Program
EPACT 2005 Commercial Lighting Tax Deduction
Lighting Design Strategy
Product Qualification Standard
Ergonomic Lighting Improvement
1.4 Years(After Utility Rebate)
79% Energy Saving
147,982 kWh/yr
PSE Enhanced Lighting Program
Eligible to receive commercial lighting tax deduction benefit
Task Ambient Lighting Strategy, Zone Based Occupancy Controls Strategy
Energy Star, Design Lights Consortium & Lighting Facts
Greater efficiency and visual comfort have been reported by the employees
Special Thanks to:
Project Management Team:
Project Manager
Strategic Solutions Manager
Mission Distribution Center Manager
Partner Relationship Manager
PSE Engineer
Rick Allen, Energywise
Ryan Kim, PLANLED
Zura Goodpaster, Mission Produce
David Kim, PLANLED
Corey Corbett, PSE
9
Case Study Series