Generation of high-temperature and low-density plasmas for ...
Light Matter Interactions at Very High Intensities · 2014-03-06 · • High-intensity lasers •...
Transcript of Light Matter Interactions at Very High Intensities · 2014-03-06 · • High-intensity lasers •...
Claes-Göran Wahlström Department of Physics
Lund University
Light Matter Interactions at Very High Intensities
Outline
• High-intensity lasers • Laser-produced plasmas • Electron motion in an intense pulse • Acceleration of protons • Acceleration of electrons
High-intensity lasers
Part of the old Nova Laser at LLNL
National Ignition Facility NIF - an Extreme Laser
180 m long
192 beams
1.8 MJ @351 nm
NIF Target Chamber
Laser Megajoule LMJ - another Extreme Laser
300 m long
240 beams
2 MJ @351 nm
NIF and LMJ : Indirect drive, MJ Energy
Lund Terawatt Laser
High-intensity lasers
Two approaches: ICF: τ ∼ 1 ns, E ∼ 100 kJ 100 TW T3: τ ∼ 10’s fs E ∼ 1 J 100 TW
API =
τEP =
ICF D = 1 mm I ~ 1 x 1016 W/cm2 T3: D = 5 µm I ~ 5 x 1020 W/cm2
Few shots/day 10 Hz
Strong-field ionization, Laser-produced plasmas
and Laser - electron interactions
High-intensity laser – matter interactions
• At high laser intensities: The Electro-Magnetic wave description is more
appropriate than the photon picture.
20
2EcI ε
= 271033.1 EI −⋅=
V/m W/cm2
Tunneling-ionization Multiphoton-ionization
IP
ground state
Eel
Over-the-barrier-ionization
Regimes of strong field ionization
Over-the-barrier-ionization
42
9104pth I
ZI ⋅
=
215 W/cm105.1
eV6.241
:
⋅=
==
→ +
th
p
I
IZ
HeHe
W/cm2
Charge state of the created ion
eV
219
1615
W/cm101.1
eV91816
:
⋅=
==
→ ++
th
p
I
IZ
ArAr
Plasma (Ionized matter)
Under dense
Over dense (no light propagation) < >
p
p
ω ω ω ω
Light propagation in plasma
Plasma frequency
e
e p m
n e
0
2
ε ω = At the critical density ωp=ω
nc~ 1021 cm-3 for near IR light
Refractive index <1 vp = c/n >c but vg<c vpvg=c2
c
e p
n
n n − = − = 1 1 2
ω
ω 2
High-intensity laser – matter interactions
• At ultra-high intensities: The magnetic field component becomes very important.
)( BvEeF
×+−=
Relativistic laser – matter interactions
2
2
2
)1(
)/(11
)(
mcEmcE
cv
vmp
BvEeFdtpd
k
tot
−=
=
−=
=
×+−==
γ
γ
γ
γ
Relativistic laser – matter interactions
)(10/101/10
10
2216
218
2
2182
laserCOmwithcmWmwithcmW
cvcm
mWI osc
µλ
µλ
µλ
=
=
≈⇒≥
Single electron in the laser field
Lorentz force:
Accelerates the electron in the laser forward direction.
)( BvEeF
×+−=
fsfsTm
87.2
,8.0
===
τ
µλ
fsfsTm
87.2
,8.0
===
τ
µλ
Single electron: Transverse acceleration vs time
Single electron: position
x
Figure-8 motion in drifting frame Figure-8 motion in lab frame
Lawson Woodward Criterion: no net acceleration in vacuum with an infinite plane wave
( )2pond IλF −∇∝
The ponderomotive force
• The light pressure pushes electrons away from regions with high intensity
Basic principles of Laser Particle Acceleration
The laser pulse pushes electrons away
Charge displacement
Quasi-static electric fields
Charged particle acceleration (e-, p+, Z+)
A high-intensity laser interacts with a plasma
Huge electrostatic fields possible in plasmas
• In RF-based accelerators: E-fields limited by electrical breakdown. E < 50 MV/m => Very long accelerators
• In a plasma: No such breakdown limit. Already a
plasma. => Very compact accelerators
e z n E ~ Ez = 300 MV/m for 1 % Density Perturbation at 1017 cm-3
Ez = 300 GV/m for 100 % Density Perturbation at 1019 cm-3
Ez = 30 TV/m for 100 % Density Perturbation at 1023 cm-3
Laser acceleration at the Lund High-Power Laser Facility
200 MeV Over 2 mm
10 MeV Over few µm
Electrons
Protons
Ion acceleration
few µm
Proton beam generation from overdense plasmas
Ion acceleration mechanisms
+ + +
Ponderomotive electron
acceleration
- - - - - -
+ + + + + +
Target Normal Sheath Acceleration
(TNSA)
Electron sheath
Protons (and other ions)
E~TV/m
Thin foil with H2O layers
Preplasma
µm
Typical characteristics
Applications of laser accelerated ions
Medical applications: Cancer therapy
PET isotope production.
Ion injection to heavy ion accelerators
Proton imaging of electric fields in plasma
Proton Therapy
Prostate tumor
The rectal portion of the bowel
Depth in tissue
Bragg peak
γ
p+ Abso
rbed
dos
e
10 -3
10 -2
10 -1
10 0
10 1
10 2
10 3
10 100 1000 10 4
Ran
ge (c
m)
Ion energy
Proton
Carbon
H20 absorber
Radiation therapy region
/ MeV
• Protons are deposited over a shorter range than x-rays (Bragg peak)
• Insignificant sideways spread (straggling range is ~ 1% of the penetration range)
• A short burst of high-energy protons can maybe breaks more DNA strands (non-linear effects)
Electron acceleration
Laser ⇒ Relativistic electrons ⇒ Non-relativistic protons
Electrons (mec2=0.5 MeV) Protons (mpc2=0.9 GeV)
v~c v~5% c
Wkin=1 MeV
Intense Laser
Gas-Jet
Electron Beam
Nozzle
Underdense Plasma
Electron beam generation in underdense plasmas
Electron acceleration in plasma wake wave
Plasma wave generation
• The ponderomotive force pushes electrons out of regions of high intensity • Ions are stationary on the fs timescale. • Induced charge separation pull back electrons • Wave generation most efficient when w0 = cτ = λp
• Plasma wave propagates with a velocity close to c • Strong accelerating and focusing electric fields
( )wavephase
lasergroup vv =
Gas medium
~10 um c v ≈
Wakefield acceleration 3D PIC simulation of a plasma wave (UCLA)
100 um
1 m radio frequency cavity
100 GV/m
20 MV/m
Gas targets - Wake-field acceleration
Electron acceleration:
Underdense plasmas: ~ 100 GV/m Over few mm giving few 100 MeV
Proton acceleration:
Thin solid targets: ~TV/m Over few µm giving ~few 10 MeV
Solid targets - Sheet acceleration
Wave breaking
ne = 5 x 1018 to 5 x 1019 cm-3
High intensity laser pulse 1 J, 35 fs, 800 nm
Supersonic gas jet target
Collimator + Electromagnet
LANEX screen
Electron energy spectrum
Thomson scattering plasma imaging
f/10 focusing
100 μm
Experimental arrangement
0 100 2000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
E / MeV
Num
ber o
f ele
ctro
ns /
a.u.
0 100 2000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
E / MeV
Num
ber o
f ele
ctro
ns /
a.u.
e- e- e- e- e- e-
Quasi-monoenergetic wakefield acceleration
Increasing the maximum energy
5.12
3 1
eL
pd n
L ∝=λλThe electrons reach their maximum
energy after the dephasing length
ep n
emc
E ∝=ω
maxMaximum electric field is
ed n
LeEW 1maxmax ∝=The maximum energy is
To increase Wmax a factor 10: Decrease ne a factor 10 Increase interaction length a factor 30
(from a few mm to several cm)
Diffraction limits the interaction to the order of the Rayleigh length
LR
wzλ
π 20=
m 400nm 800m 10
L
0
µλ
µ
=⇒==
Rz
w
A Relativistic Channel in Helium Plasma
Helium gas
Gas nozzle
Relativistic Self-Focusing
I(r)
r
n(r)
r
Focusing Lens ! n(ωp)
ωp(me)
me(v)
v(I)
Light intensity in the focus:
Refractive index in the focus:
Relativistic channelling
Helium gas
Gas nozzle
ne = 5 x 1018 to 5 x 1019 cm-3
High intensity laser pulse 1 J, 35 fs, 800 nm
Supersonic gas jet target
Collimator + Electromagnet
LANEX screen
Electron energy spectrum
Thomson scattering plasma imaging
f/10 focusing
100 μm
Experimental arrangement
Waveguide capillaries
Hollow dielectric capillaries • Preliminary results show excellent guiding • Guiding over several cm possible • Sensitive to laser pointing variation and
spot quality (damage)
L
Material: Glass Length: 3 to 10 cm Inner diam: 100 µm
Electron beam properties
+ Small source size (~10 µm) + Low divergence (~5 mrad) + Quasi-monoenergetic (∆E/E~10%) + Short duration (<25 fs) + High charge (~100 pC)
- Repetition rate (~1 – 10 Hz) - Stability (today)
100 pC/25 fs= 4 kA
Progress of accelerator technology
LLC
LBNL
electrons
Thank you !