LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan · drains were migrating beyond the...
Transcript of LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan · drains were migrating beyond the...
LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan
4.17
Repair of deeply incised drainagechannels using heather bales. Thedrains were migrating beyond theInclosure boundary causing damageto mire and wet heath habitats onthe open Forest. At its worst pointthe bed level of this drainagechannel was 2.5m deep.
LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan
4.9.3 River Restoration Techniques
A) Installation of Log Weirs
Where bed gravels have been scoured and lost from headwater sections of a stream butwhere the solid geology (e.g. underlying clay) is still intact, low log weirs can be installed inthe river bed to act as sediment traps. The weirs capture and retain any gravels that stillremain in that part of the system or that are being washed down from further upstream.They also help to stabalise the bed and prevent erosion and scour progressing furtherupstream. Figure 37 shows how this technique was used successfully at Holmsley.
Figure 37: Use of Log Weirs
Source: Environment Agency
Log Weirs - Holmesley Inclosure
4.18
LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan
B) Bed level Raising
Where channels have become over deepened due to scour and erosion it is often necessaryto raise the bed back up to the original level using infill material as closely matched in characterto that originally lost (refer to section 3.4). Local sources of material include:
◆ Local Quarries – e.g. Hamer Warren (Cemex), Pennington (New Milton Sand & Ballast)◆ Areas along the stream network where excess eroded gravels have been deposited ◆ Spoil Heaps
In order to prevent the new material being washed out, malleable clay plugs can be usedin limited areas to form cells to hold the material in place on the upstream side. Over timethe river will naturally sort and regrade the new material into a natural bed form. Whereappropriate, the new raised bed level can be used to re-connect the river into former meanderson the downstream side as described further below.
Good examples of bed level raising can be seen at:
◆ Blackensford Bottom◆ Highland Water
Past attempts to reduce erosion byinfilling with branchwood failed
C) Restoration of flow back into natural meanders
Once bed levels have been raised as appropriate upstream, the channel can be restored toits natural course by the reinstatement of the original channel and old meanders (Figure37).
The design of the meanders where possible should follow the original course of the river bylinking up the old paleomeanders. The course of the old meanders is usually possible totrace through topographic remnants and patterns of organic debris on thefloodplain sup-ported by survey work and reference to historic maps. Excavation of the soil surface oftenreveals the gravels forming the original river bed. Where this is not clear trial holes can alsobe dug to establish original bed levels.
4.19
Bed level raising - Blackensford Brook
LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan
Usually it has only been necessary to scrape back the organic debris to reveal the oldsubstrate with an emphasis on under rather than over excavation and a preference for leavingthe river to wash out any remaining excess organic debris.
In order to connect the river to its restored channel the straightened channel is blocked offusing a plug of compacted malleable clay topped off with material from surrounding exca-vations or excavated spoil banks. A similar plug may also be required at the downstreamend if the old channel is being backfilled depending upon location and fisheries issues. Itmay also be necessary to incorporate a v-notch in the downstream plug to facilitate fishpassage. It is important that the plug is set at a high enough level and is big enough todeflect flows into the new restored channel. Experience has shown that clay plugs canbreach when water is allowed spill directly over the plugs during times of flood flow,particularly in the period post restoration before material has had a chance to consolidate.
Once the river has been diverted into its newly restored channel, it is preferable to fill in theold straightened channel with excess material from old spoil banks and material excavatedin the process of restoring the new channel. Although it can take substantial material todo so is preferable to fill in the old channel because:
◆ Leaving the old channel open will cause it to function as a deep ditch drawing in waterfrom the surround floodplain.
◆ At times of raised flow it can act as a long backwater trapping fish when the water levelfalls again. The creation of short backwaters can add diversity and provide large poolsas seen at the lower end of the Highland Water restoration works.
◆ Leaves potential for the new channel to breach back into the old channel especially where the two channels run close to one another and run out of bank during times offlood flow.
◆ Potential safety hazard
Where there is a shortage of fill material, large conifer tree trunks and stumps which wouldotherwise be removed from the floodplain can be used to provide bulk fill before beingcovered with mineral infill. However, consideration needs to be given to any pollution riskfrom the degradation of organic material.
In other sections it may be appropriate to partially infill and/or regrade the channel banksto form shallow hollows or floodplain pools.
4.20
LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan
Figure 37: Restoration of natural meanders
Source: Environment Agency
4.21
Constructing clay plug - Markway
Meander restoration - Highland Water
LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan
Good examples of channel restoration can be seen at:
◆ Highland Water◆ Rhinefield◆ Markway◆ Dames Slough◆ Blackensford
D) Installation of Debris Dams
As discussed in Section 3.4 debris dams are important components in restoring a river andit’s associated habitats. When considering the use of debris dams as a restoration techniqueit is important to consider the individual river reaches and determine whether they wouldnaturally support debris dams depending upon the nature of the surrounding habitat relativeto the availability of woody debris. For example stream reaches running through openheathland (e.g. Ditchend Brook) are less likely to support the density of debris dams foundin the highly forested catchments such as Highland Water or the lower reaches of theBeaulieu.
It can take tens or even hundreds of years to form dams by natural processes dependingupon the availability of large woody debris (LWD). However, the provision of woody debriscan be accelerated as a by-product of complimentary activities such as pollarding of ash, oakand holly species. The arising can contribute to flood plain flow processes or can help theformation of in-steam debris dams if they are washed into the channel. In order to furthersecure the availability of natural woody debris to supply debris dams it is recommended thatwhere possible natural tree and branch falls are left in situ where they fall on a floodplain.This is in line with the Timber Management Protocol agreed between the EnvironmentAgency, English Nature and the Forestry Commission (Appendix O).
However, the presence of straight, cut material can create an impermeable debris dam thatcan be detrimental to the movement of fish. This is particularly relevant to the harvestingof conifers on the floodplain within Inclosures and in such instances such timber/arisingsshould be removed from the floodplain.
To further aid the natural process, large pieces of woody debris can be introduced into thechannel:
◆ By placing individual pieces of debris in stream using machines◆ Push over adjacent trees so that either the branches or trunk are in the stream◆ Felling adjacent trees but retaining a hinge so that the tree is still alive◆ Digging in live material that has been cut for the purpose, for example willow or alder
When placing woody debris in channel the following general principles need to beconsidered (Mott, 2005):
◆ The length of the pieces should be at least as long as the channel width◆ The diameter needs to at least 0.1m or 5% of the channel width (whichever is the
largest)
4.22
LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan
◆ The Large Woody Debris may need to be securely keyed into the bed of the watercourseat an angle of 20o-40o to the channel/flow direction.
◆ In highly wooded catchments, to replicate the natural density of New Forest debris damsit is recommended that very large pieces of woody debris are placed across the channelat 150m intervals. Once a key piece is in place natural processes will do the rest when debris becomes snagged during times of flood flow.
Debris dams can be critical in maintaining and building up bed levels. In some reacheswhere damage is not extreme, bed levels in the existing channel may have remained fairlyconstant. In such locations the strategic placement of debris dams may be the only restorationtechnique required, allowing the river’s own dynamic processes to do the restoration.
Examples of debris dams at work can be found on most of the Forest streams with some keyexamples located:
◆ along the length of Highland Water and Blackwater◆ Queen North Wood - Fritham , Dockens Water
E) Vegetation management including holly management, scrub clearance, grazingand fence realignment
Any forestry works are carried out in accordance with The UK Forestry Standard and asso-ciated Forestry Commission Guidelines
i) Holly Management
Holly management is a seasonal activity which starts in late December, depending upon theseverity of the winter, and continues to the end of February. It is beneficial because it opensup the ground to light and allows regeneration of rare lower plant communities (e.g. lichen)on adjacent oak and beech trees. Preserving the main holly stem protects any rare lichensthat may be colonising the holly. Traditionally, cut holly also provides valuable winter fodderfor grazing ponies. The general treatment methods for Holly is given in Table 4.12.
4.23
In accordance with its former duties, the Forestry Commission has historically beenresponsible for the removal of woody debris to maintain free-flowing watercourses. Thishas been undertaken for many decades and as a consequence the streams of the Forestare impoverished in respect of woody debris. Moving away from the traditional man-agement of woody debris to a more enlightened view has required a cultural shiftamong staff in this organisation. To disseminate the understanding of the role of woodydebris, the Forestry Commission has written a policy document (Appendix N) for the NewForest in consultation with English Nature and the Environment Agency. This has beenpresented to staff to encourage a more sensitive approach to the management ofriparian corridors.
LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan
Table 4.12: Holly Treatment Methods
Source: Review of Holly Cutting in the New Forest 1997
4.24
Holly prior to pollarding
Holly post pollarding – holly leaves have
been eaten by ponies
Holly Type
Dense holly < 2m inheightDense holly > 2m inheight but dominated bysmall diameter holly
Older stands dominatedby holly over 15cm (6”) indiameter
Treatment Method
◆ Do not cut◆ Useful for protection for young saplings + not palatable to ponies◆ Cutting good for nature conservation purposes◆ Best cut in blocks of 30-100m across, close to a path to allow ponies to find
the cut holly. ◆ Do not cut holly at the edge of a wood to maintain shelter◆ All holly <10cm (4”) diameter should be coppiced◆ All holly >10cm(4”) diameter should be pollarded◆ Hollies well colonised by lichens (i.e. those with extensive white splashes on
the bark) should be favoured over those with bare bark (i.e with a uniformgreyish brown bark)
◆ Where possible green growth should be left on new pollards◆ Old pollards, especially those >0.3m in diameter should be repollarded
using a safe platform or handtools or left uncut◆ Occasional old Holly trees or Holly grown into the canopy can be left◆ Only cut enough holly per work day in each site that can be eaten by the
ponies before it goes off◆ Leafy material should be cut up and spread◆ If access allows, larger wood can be cut into cordwood lengths (4ft) and left
stacked for removal in the summer
◆ Only cut in series of small scattered sites or isolated specimens◆ Do not cut at the edge of a wood or holm to maintain shelter◆ Where alternatives are available Holly in old woods should be cut instead
of Holly in the open in Holly holms◆ Any small diameter holly can be coppiced, especially near mature trees◆ Maiden hollies should be pollarded at shoulder height◆ On multi-stemmed Holly only 1 or 2 stems should be pollarded◆ Old pollards, especially those >0.3m in diameter should be repollarded
using a safe platform or handtools or left uncut◆ Occasional old Holly trees or Holly grown into the canopy can be left◆ Only cut enough holly per work day in each site that can be eaten by the
ponies before it goes off◆ Leafy material should be cut up and spread◆ If access allows, larger wood can be cut into cordwood lengths (4ft) and left
stacked for removal in the summer
LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan
ii) Scrub management
Scrub clearance is generally carried out using chainsaws or tractor-mounted flail.Brushwood is gathered up burnt on site, although the number of burn sites are restrictedto as few as possible to avoid damaging the ground surface. Any cut timber is stacked andleft on site to dry before being sold and removed from site in the spring (if accessible).
4.25
Scrub clearance- Stony Moors
LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan
iii) Rhododendron Clearance
Large areas of rhododendron clearance are tackled using an excavator as shown below. Thearisings are burnt and stumps are then treated with Glyphosphate and High Trees MixtureB to prevent regrowth.
iv) Regeneration of alluvial and bog woodland using fence realignment &introduction of grazing
To date the use of deer exclosure plots has been used as standard silviculture practice inpromoting the natural regeneration of native tree species in the New Forest. However, thismethod promotes tree colonisation with a relatively even aged stand structure. Timescalesfor regeneration within exclosure plots operate over far shorter time periods of between 5-10years compared to natural regeneration in unfenced areas that is slow and inconspicuous.However, a review of woodland cover dating back to the 1860’s shows that Riparian andBog woodland has been expanding steadily in key locations over the last 140 years(Sanderson, 2004).
As the key aim of habitat restoration is to regenerate near-natural bog and alluvial woodland,the use of deer exclosure plots has been considered less appropriate. Instead, fences havebeen realigned to open up parts of Inclosures to allow variable but significant grazing pressureand link the habitats back into the floodplain and Open Forest. This technique has a numberof advantages:
◆ It avoids the situation in ungrazed sites where bracken dominates on drier areas preventing the colonisation by trees leaving the wetter areas to become densely colonised by trees. This results in a woodland structure atypical of the existing riparianwoodlands.
◆ The early 19th century Oak plantations provide an existing resource for restoring high quality riparian woodland. However they lack the structural diversity typical of riparianwoodland on the Open Forest, in particular a shrub layer comprising species such as Dogwood, Spindle, Crab Apple, Hazel, Wych Elm, Field Maple and Yew.
◆ Where the aim is to allow the development of riverine and bog woodland with minimalintervention, variable but significant grazing pressure is required to maintain structuraland species diversity. Grazing is essential in controlling invasive species, such as Bracken,
4.26
LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan
Molinia and Holly. Inter-linking the stands back into the open forest should allow stock tostray and graze these areas.
◆ Grazing by stock is essential in maintaining the traditional linkages between open mireand bog woodland. For example grazing maintains the quality of the open mire by
reducing molinia dominance and preventing tree growth in all but the wettest areas.
◆ Intact patches of riverine and bog woodland still survive within some of the later Inclosures. These woodlands were “captured” during the formation of the Inclosures and have survived because of protection from clearance under the 1877 New Forest Act.
Examples where fencing re-alignment has taken place include:
◆ Highland Water Inclosure◆ Dames Slough & Burley New Inclosures◆ Wootton Inclosure◆ Vinney Ridge Inclosure ◆ Newlands Plantation
F) Road and track maintenance
In the New Forest wetland restoration work associated with the maintenance of roadsidedrains mainly applies where the watercourse cuts across or through/under a structure. Areaswhere works may need to be carried out include:
◆ Areas where tracks pond the through-flow of water◆ Where water flows across a track and washes out gravels into the surrounding habitat◆ Areas of wetland where a well designed crossing point is required to prevent the spreadof erosion from riders/walkers accessing the area.
Design, construction and maintenance of road and bridges are the responsibility of theForestry Commission Civil Engineering Division.
Good design principles for forestry roads and bridges taking account of the effects on thewater environment are set out in Chapter 6 of the Forest and Water Guidelines.
4.27
Rakes Brakes Bottom Bridge Causeway
LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan
4.10 Issues & Actions
Table 4.13 summarises the key wetland restoration issues (identified in Chapter 3) togetherwith potential actions for consideration when identifying future works and formulatingwork plans.
4.28
Ferny KnappCauseway
FURTHER READING
Sanderson N.A., Fencing Proposals Under Life 3 Ecological Report
Environment Agency (2004) Sustainable Wetland Restoration in the New Forest –River Restoration Proposals
Forestry Commission (1997) Review of Holly Cutting in the New Forest
Forestry Commission (2003) Forest & Water Guidelines, Fourth Edition
Mott N. (2005) Managing Woody Debris in Rivers and Streams, StaffordshireWildlife Trust
4.13: Wetland Restoration Issues & Actions Summary Table
Issu
e
Clim
ate
Clim
ate
Ch
ang
e
Incr
ease
d
evap
ora
tio
n
du
e to
ve
get
atio
ncl
eara
nce
an
d n
atu
ral l
ow
su
mm
er f
low
s
Geo
log
ical
, Geo
mo
rph
olo
gy
& S
oils
Susc
epti
bili
ty o
f th
e so
il to
dam
age
Hyd
rolo
gy
& D
rain
age
His
tori
c m
odif
icat
ion
of d
rain
s an
d w
ater
cour
ses
Man
agem
ent
of
Deb
ris
Dam
sTr
app
ed p
re-In
clo
sure
riv
erin
e &
bo
g w
oo
dla
nd
Do
wn
str
eam
flo
od
ing
Nat
ura
l Lo
w S
um
mer
Flo
ws
Wat
er q
ual
ity
& d
iffu
se p
ollu
tio
n
Ch
ang
e in
Fo
rest
Co
ver
Act
ion
Res
tora
tio
n o
f m
ire
and
oth
er w
etla
nd
hab
itat
s to
pro
vid
e b
ette
r b
uff
er f
or
hab
itat
s to
co
pe
and
ad
apt
to c
limat
e ch
ang
e C
on
sid
er e
ffec
ts o
f ve
get
atio
n c
lear
ance
as
par
t o
fw
ork
pla
n a
nd
if
nec
essa
ry r
etai
n s
trat
egic
are
as o
fsh
ade.
Co
nsi
der
lo
cati
on
, so
il se
nsi
tivi
ty
and
ap
pro
pri
ate
tim
ing
o
f w
ork
s p
arti
cula
rly
wh
en
usi
ng
h
eavy
mac
hin
ery.
Use
su
rfac
e p
rote
ctio
n (
e.g
. b
rush
mat
s o
r g
eote
xtile
mat
wh
ere
nec
essa
ry)
Neg
oti
ate
bu
dg
et c
on
trac
ts c
lau
ses
to a
llow
lee
way
to d
elay
sp
end
ing
mo
ney
du
rin
g p
erio
ds
of
extr
eme
wet
wea
ther
wh
en e
nvi
ron
men
tal d
amag
e co
uld
ou
tw
eig
h b
enef
its
Dra
in in
filli
ng
, bed
leve
l rai
sin
g &
riv
er r
esto
rati
on
Man
age
in a
cco
rdan
ce w
ith
deb
ris
dam
po
licy
Res
tora
tio
n o
f n
atu
ral f
loo
d r
egim
eC
on
tin
ue
wo
rk o
n d
ata
colle
ctio
n, e
xist
ing
mo
del
ling
and
mo
nit
ori
ng
Furt
her
dat
a co
llect
ion
an
d m
od
ellin
g w
ork
may
be
req
uir
ed f
or
new
res
tora
tio
n w
ork
s M
ire
rest
ora
tio
n t
o r
etai
n m
ore
wat
er in
th
e sy
stem
Stak
eho
lder
inte
rest
in N
ew F
ore
st C
AM
S p
roce
ssId
enti
fica
tio
n o
f d
iffu
se p
ollu
tio
n s
ou
rces
Iden
tify
in
itia
tive
s to
en
cou
rag
e m
ain
ten
ance
an
dre
pla
cem
ent
of
old
sep
tic
tan
ksN
eed
ap
pro
pri
ate
bu
dg
et a
lloca
tio
n t
o F
C E
stat
es t
oal
low
rep
lace
men
t o
f o
ld t
anks
Sc
op
e to
su
pp
ort
Ph
D s
tud
ies
Prio
rity
Imm
edia
te a
nd
on
-go
ing
thro
ug
h n
ext
10 y
ears
and
bey
on
dO
n-g
oin
g
On
-go
ing
On
-go
ing
fro
m h
igh
to
low
pri
ori
ty d
epen
din
gu
po
n lo
cati
on
On
-go
ing
Hig
hO
n-g
oin
g
Hig
hH
igh
Med
ium
Med
ium
Hig
h
Med
ium
Res
po
nsi
bili
ty
All
Part
ner
s
FC/E
N/E
A/N
T
FC/E
A/N
T
FC/E
A
All
All
EA/S
ou
tham
pto
nU
niv
ersi
ty
FC/E
NA
llA
llA
ll
FC FC/E
A/s
take
ho
lder
s
Issu
e
Eco
log
ical
&N
atu
re C
on
serv
atio
n Is
sues
Co
nd
itio
n s
tatu
s o
f h
abit
ats
Dry
ing
of
Mir
esD
rain
age
& C
anal
isat
ion
res
ult
ing
in
lo
ss o
ffl
oodi
ng re
gim
e re
sult
ing
in h
abit
at d
egra
dati
onIn
vasi
on
of
pes
t an
d e
xoti
c sp
ecie
s
Dea
d w
oo
d r
emo
val &
Deb
ris
Dam
s
Co
pp
ice
of
ald
er/s
allo
w
stan
ds
in
rive
rin
ew
oo
dla
nd
Trap
ped
pre
-incl
osu
re r
iver
ine
& b
og
wo
od
lan
d
Effe
ct o
f ri
ver
rest
ora
tio
n o
n f
ish
sp
ecie
s
Effe
cts
of
Deb
ris
dam
s o
n f
ish
Effe
ct o
f ch
ann
elis
atio
n o
nm
acro
inve
rteb
rate
co
mm
un
itie
s
Dec
line
in b
reed
ing
wad
er p
op
ula
tio
ns
Low
flo
ws
pla
cin
g s
tres
s o
n f
ish
po
pu
lati
on
s
Act
ion
Res
tora
tio
n o
f w
etla
nd
hab
itat
s to
ach
ieve
95%
SSS
Ifa
vou
rab
le c
on
dit
ion
sta
tus
by
2010
Mir
e R
esto
rati
on
Res
tora
tio
n o
f ri
vers
an
d a
sso
ciat
ed f
loo
dp
lain
fun
ctio
nR
emo
val o
f ex
oti
cs a
nd
pes
t sp
ecie
sIn
crea
se k
no
wle
dg
e o
f d
istr
ibu
tio
n o
f p
est
spec
ies
Rem
ove
cu
t ti
mb
er &
bra
sh, e
spec
ially
co
nif
er f
ellin
gs
fro
m t
he
flo
od
pla
inU
nd
erta
ke c
op
pic
ing
an
d p
olla
rdin
g w
ork
in s
elec
ted
loca
tio
ns
Res
tora
tio
n o
f n
atu
ral
flo
od
reg
ime,
sel
ecti
ve f
ellin
g&
scr
ub
rem
ova
l, re
intr
od
uct
ion
of
gra
zin
g.
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pl
ann
ing
tim
ing
of
wo
rks
to a
void
mig
rati
on
an
dsp
awn
ing
per
iod
sU
se o
f se
dim
ent
mat
s in
sen
siti
ve l
oca
tio
n t
o a
void
smo
ther
ing
of
do
wn
stre
am g
rave
lsM
on
ito
rin
g o
f d
ebri
s d
ams
to e
nsu
re t
hat
pas
sag
e o
fm
igra
tory
fis
h is
un
imp
eded
Res
tora
tio
n
of
hyd
rau
lic
con
nec
tivi
ty
and
ch
ann
elva
riat
ion
Surv
ey &
Mo
nit
or
exis
tin
g &
fu
ture
wo
rks
Imp
lem
enta
tio
n o
f in
itia
tive
s fr
om
Pro
gre
ss P
roje
ctO
n-g
oin
g w
etla
nd
hab
itat
res
tora
tio
nC
on
tin
ued
su
rvey
& m
on
ito
rin
gC
on
tin
ue
Mir
e re
sto
rati
on
Sup
po
rt C
AM
S p
roce
ssSu
pp
ort
/hel
p w
ith
init
iati
ves
to im
pro
ve w
ater
qu
alit
y
Prio
rity
On
-go
ing
/Hig
h
On
-go
ing
/Hig
hH
igh
–low
dep
endi
ng u
pon
habi
tat
valu
e &
loca
tion
Hig
h-m
ediu
m
On
-go
ing
On
-go
ing
On
-go
ing
On
-go
ing
Hig
h
Med
ium
Hig
h
Hig
h-m
ediu
m
On
-go
ing
Hig
h
On
-go
ing
Hig
hM
ediu
m
Res
po
nsi
bili
ty
FC/E
N/E
A/N
T
FC/E
NFC
/EA
/EN
FC FC FC FC/N
T
EA FC/E
A/E
N
FC/E
A
FC/E
A/E
N
FC/E
A/E
N
EA FC/S
take
ho
lder
sA
ll Pa
rtn
ers
FC/R
SPB
FC/E
NA
ll/St
akeh
old
ers
All/
stak
eho
lder
s
Issu
e
Arc
hae
olo
gic
al Is
sues
Pro
tect
ion
of
Kn
ow
n A
rch
aeo
log
ical
Sit
es
Arc
hae
olo
gic
al P
ote
nti
al
Lan
dsc
ape
Issu
esLa
nd
scap
e ch
ang
e
Lan
dsc
ape
feat
ure
s an
d e
xoti
cs
Fore
st F
urn
itu
re
Lan
d U
seR
estr
icte
d a
cces
s to
tim
ber
har
vest
ing
sit
esd
uri
ng
win
ter
Loca
tio
n
of
wo
rks
rela
tive
to
re
crea
tio
nal
acti
viti
es
Ho
ney
Po
t ef
fect
s al
on
g r
iver
s an
d s
trea
ms
Gra
zin
g P
atte
rns
Act
ion
Co
nti
nu
e to
liai
se w
ith
sta
tuto
ry a
nd
vo
lun
tary
org
anis
atio
ns
to id
enti
fy v
uln
erab
le s
ites
Mar
k/te
mp
ora
rily
fen
ce s
ites
fo
r th
eir
pro
tect
ion
du
rin
g w
ork
sC
arry
ou
t m
ore
det
aile
d a
rch
aeo
log
ical
fie
ld s
urv
eys
wh
ere
advi
sed
by
stat
uto
ry b
od
ies
Co
nsi
der
or
sup
po
rt o
pp
ort
un
itie
s to
car
ry o
ut
furt
her
arch
aeo
log
ical
inve
stig
atio
ns
aro
un
d t
he
Fore
st
Spre
ad o
ut
wo
rk o
ver
tim
e an
d lo
cati
on
an
d w
her
ep
oss
ible
ad
her
e to
tim
ing
fo
r Fo
rest
W
ork
ing
Blo
cks
Ret
enti
on
of
key
stan
ds
of
tree
s o
r is
ola
tio
nsp
ecim
ens
cert
ain
loca
tio
ns
Ap
pro
pri
ate
sele
ctio
n &
des
ign
of
Fore
st f
urn
itu
reA
pp
rop
riat
e co
nsu
ltat
ion
wit
h v
erd
erer
s
Be
awar
e o
f p
ote
nti
al r
estr
icti
on
s d
uri
ng
pla
nn
ing
of
tim
ber
ext
ract
ion
pro
gra
mm
e.
Incl
ud
e p
ollu
tio
n c
on
tro
l mea
sure
s at
fo
rd c
ross
ing
sd
uri
ng
tim
ber
har
vest
ing
.Te
mp
ora
rily
res
tric
t ac
cess
on
saf
ety
gro
un
ds
du
rin
gco
nst
ruct
ion
ph
ase
Re-
rou
te a
ny
foo
tpat
h n
etw
ork
s u
sin
g e
xist
ing
net
-w
ork
Mai
nta
in/im
pro
ve c
ross
ing
po
ints
Ad
van
ce &
car
efu
l pla
nn
ing
ass
oci
ated
wit
h a
ny
futu
re c
ar p
ark
clo
sure
sC
on
tin
ue
op
po
rtu
nit
y to
pro
vid
e ar
eas
of
new
g
razi
ng
as
par
t o
f re
sto
rati
on
wo
rks
Prio
rity
Hig
h/o
n-g
oin
g
Hig
h/o
n-g
oin
g
Hig
h
Med
ium
On
-go
ing
/med
ium
On
-go
ing
On
-go
ing
On
-go
ing
Med
ium
-Lo
w
Hig
h
On
-go
ing
Med
ium
On
-go
ing
/Hig
hH
igh
Med
ium
Res
po
nsi
bili
ty
All
All
All
All/
stak
eho
lder
s
All
FC/E
N
FC FC FC FC FC FC FC/E
AFC
/EN
FC/E
N/V
erd
erer
s
Issu
e
Fen
cin
g &
Dri
ft L
ines
Cre
atio
n o
f In
crea
sed
Gra
zin
g
Sto
ck W
ater
ing
Imp
rove
d s
tock
saf
ety
Co
nsu
ltat
ion
& C
on
sen
t
Leg
isla
tio
n, P
lan
s &
Po
licie
sC
om
plia
nce
wit
h e
xist
ing
leg
isla
tio
n,
Plan
s &
Polic
ies
Stak
eho
lder
in
tere
st
in
oth
er
pla
ns
&St
rate
gie
s
Act
ion
s ar
isin
g f
rom
oth
er p
lan
s &
str
ateg
ies
Act
ion
Mai
nta
in a
pp
rop
riat
e d
rift
lin
esC
hec
k Fo
ot
& M
ou
th C
on
tin
gen
cy P
lan
wh
en p
lan
-n
ing
an
y ch
ang
es t
o In
clo
sure
fen
cin
gC
on
tin
ue
op
po
rtu
nit
ies
to r
ein
stat
e lo
st g
razi
ng
thro
ug
h r
esto
rati
on
wo
rkM
on
ito
r ch
ang
es in
bra
cken
co
ver
adja
cen
t to
rest
ore
d w
ater
cou
rses
Imp
rove
ava
ilab
ility
of
wat
er t
o s
tock
du
rin
g d
rysu
mm
er m
on
ths
du
e to
mir
e re
sto
rati
on
& b
ed-l
evel
rais
ing
Infi
lling
of
deep
dra
inag
e di
tche
s an
d be
d le
vel r
aisi
ngC
on
tin
ue
to u
nd
erta
ke c
on
sult
atio
n o
n p
rop
ose
dw
ork
s an
d t
ake
view
s in
to c
on
sid
erat
ion
wh
enfo
rmu
lati
ng
wo
rk p
lan
s.Le
gis
lati
on
, Pla
ns
& P
olic
ies
Ensu
re t
hat
ad
equ
ate
con
sult
atio
n a
nd
liai
son
tak
esp
lace
bet
wee
n s
taff
up
dat
ing
th
e Fo
rest
Des
ign
Pla
nan
d t
ho
se t
akin
g f
orw
ard
th
e Im
ple
men
tati
on
Pla
nto
en
sure
th
at t
he
Plan
s m
atch
up
.
Ch
eck
that
an
y w
ork
s ar
e co
mp
lian
t w
ith
leg
isla
tio
n,
key
pla
ns
& p
olic
ies
and
co
nsu
lt/n
ego
tiat
e w
her
eap
pro
pri
ate
Ensu
re t
hat
ad
equ
ate
inte
rest
is t
aken
in t
he
con
sult
atio
n p
roce
ss f
or
oth
er s
trat
egie
s b
ein
g p
re-
par
ed f
or
the
Fore
st t
hat
co
uld
be
rele
van
t to
wet
lan
dre
sto
rati
on
Seek
sco
pe
for
mu
tual
co
-op
erat
ion
wit
h o
rgan
isa-
tio
ns
to a
dd
ress
pro
ject
s/st
rate
gie
s to
fo
rwar
d w
et-
lan
d r
esto
rati
on
Prio
rity
Hig
hH
igh
On
-go
ing
/Hig
h
Med
ium
Med
ium
Med
ium
On
-go
ing
/Hig
h
Hig
h
Med
ium
/Hig
h
Med
ium
Res
po
nsi
bili
ty
FC/V
erd
erer
sFC
/Ver
der
ers
FC/V
erd
erer
s
FC/E
N/V
erd
erer
sFC
/Ver
der
ers
FC/V
erd
erer
sA
ll
FC All
All
All
PART 5CASE STUDIES
LIFE 02 NAT/UK/8544 New Forest Wetland Management Plan
CASE STUDY 1: HOLLY HATCH BOTTOM MIRE RESTORATION
Background
Holly Hatch Bottom (S.U. 224 124) is located on the northern side of Ocknell Plain fromwhere it conveys runoff into the Dockens Water. The valley supports a range of habitattypes including seepage mires, soakway, vegetation, humid & wet heath, wet grassland,scrub and woodland.
Shallow drains have historically been dug at the lower end of the mire/soakway system. Inaddition peripheral drains dug around the adjacent Holly Hatch Inclosure had becomeblocked leading to water being re-routed into the mire drainage system resulting inincreased run off leading to extensive gully and headward erosion.
The restoration proposals aimed to:
◆ Take away the excess runoff from the mire system by re-route the flow from the Inclosure boundary back into its the original drainage ditch adjacent to the Inclosure embankment.
◆ Restore the original bed levels in the stream draining the mire system and repair the headward erosion.
◆ Fell scattered Scots Pine encroaching on the mire system but retaining any landscape character trees
The Works
The works focused on 6 areas as shown on Figure A.
Area 1 – Site of the Inclosure boundary . Works comprised installation of a culvert beneaththe access route into the Inclosure, raising of the upstream drain by 0.3m. On the down-stream side two beech stems obstructing the ditch were removed and general leaf litter andwoody material dredged out.
Area 2 – Removal of incised ditch that was conveying water from the Inclosure boundary tothe mire system. The ditch measured 15 m long by 1-1.3m deep and 1.25-1.5 m wide. Thiswas achieved by infilling the ditch to bank height using staked heather bales and clay plugs.Remnant spoil was scattered over the surface of the bales to aid colonisation.
Area 3 – Upstream channel. At the most upstream nick point the channel was infilled for3-4m down to a stock crossing point followed by infill of a 2mX2m plunge pool created bynick point erosion to within 0.15m of bank height. The downstream 10 m long channelwhich was suffering from subsidence and erosion creating a channel 2.5m wide x 1.2mdeep was infilled to the same level as the plunge pool upstream gradually tapering to 0.3mbelow bank height downstream. This was achieved using staked heather bales and clayplugs.
5.1