Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

51
Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics Using Economic Data

description

Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics. Using Economic Data. Empirical Questions. Empirical Questions. What exactly are you trying to measure? Is your variable consistent with what you’re trying to measure?. Example:Poverty in the US. Poverty in the US - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Page 1: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Using Economic Data

Page 2: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Empirical Questions

Page 3: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Empirical Questions

• What exactly are you trying to measure? Is your variable consistent with what you’re trying to measure?

Page 4: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Example:Poverty in the US

Page 5: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Defining Poverty

Poverty in the US

• Poverty was defined by Mollie Orshansky of the SSA in 1964 as 3 times the cost of the Dept. of Agriculture’s “economy food plan”

Page 6: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Defining Poverty

Poverty in the US

• Poverty was defined by Mollie Orshansky of the SSA in 1964 as 3 times the cost of the Dept. of Agriculture’s “economy food plan”

• Since 1964, that number has been updated annually for changes in inflation

Page 7: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Defining Poverty

Poverty in the US• Poverty was defined by

Mollie Orshansky of the SSA in 1964 as 3 times the cost of the Dept. of Agriculture’s “economy food plan”

• Since 1964, that number has been updated annually for changes in inflation

• Currently, the poverty line is $9,359/yr for a single person

Page 8: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Defining Poverty

Poverty in the US• Poverty was defined by

Mollie Orshansky of the SSA in 1964 as 3 times the cost of the Dept. of Agriculture’s “economy food plan”

• Since 1964, that number has been updated annually for changes in inflation

• Currently, the poverty line is $9,359/yr for a single person

International Poverty

• Of the 184 member countries of the world bank. 52 countries are considered “high income” – defined as a per capita income of more than $9,206/yr

Page 9: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Defining Poverty

Poverty in the US• Poverty was defined by

Mollie Orshansky of the SSA in 1964 as 3 times the cost of the Dept. of Agriculture’s “economy food plan”

• Since 1964, that number has been updated annually for changes in inflation

• Currently, the poverty line is $9,359/yr for a single person

International Poverty

• Of the 184 member countries of the world bank. 52 countries are considered “high income” – per capita income of more than $9,206/yr

• 66 countries are considered “low income” (less than $746/yr)

Page 10: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Defining Poverty

Poverty in the US• Poverty was defined by

Mollie Orshansky of the SSA in 1964 as 3 times the cost of the Dept. of Agriculture’s “economy food plan”

• Since 1964, that number has been updated annually for changes in inflation

• Currently, the poverty line is $9,359/yr for a single person

International Poverty• Of the 184 member countries

of the world bank. 52 countries are considered “high income” – per capita income of more than $9,206/yr

• 66 countries are considered “low income” (less than $746/yr)

• Currently the international poverty standard is $1/day

Page 11: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Empirical Questions

• What exactly are you trying to measure? Is your variable consistent with what you’re trying to measure?

• How is your variable measured?

Page 12: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Example: US Unemployment

0123456789

9/1/

1990

6/1/

1991

3/1/

1992

12/1

/199

2

9/1/

1993

6/1/

1994

3/1/

1995

12/1

/199

5

9/1/

1996

6/1/

1997

3/1/

1998

12/1

/199

8

9/1/

1999

6/1/

2000

3/1/

2001

12/1

/200

1

9/1/

2002

Page 13: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Measuring Unemployment

• Each month, the Department of Labor surveys 60,000 households. Each household is placed in one of four categories

Page 14: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Measuring Unemployment

• Each month, the Department of Labor surveys 60,000 households. Each household is placed in one of four categories

A. Under 16 or institutionalized

Page 15: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Measuring Unemployment

• Each month, the Department of Labor surveys 60,000 households. Each household is placed in one of four categories

A. Under 16 or institutionalized

B. Choose not to work: Not in Labor Force

Page 16: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Measuring Unemployment

• Each month, the Department of Labor surveys 60,000 households. Each household is placed in one of four categories

A. Under 16 or institutionalized

B. Choose not to work: Not in Labor Force

C. Choose to work and are working: Employed

Page 17: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Measuring Unemployment

• Each month, the Department of Labor surveys 60,000 households. Each household is placed in one of four categories

A. Under 16 or institutionalized

B. Choose not to work: Not in Labor Force

C. Choose to work and are working: Employed

D. Choose to work, but can’t find a job: Unemployed

Page 18: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Measuring Unemployment

• Each month, the Department of Labor surveys 60,000 households. Each household is placed in one of four categories

A. Under 16 or institutionalized

B. Choose not to work: Not in Labor Force

C. Choose to work and are working: Employed

D. Choose to work, but can’t find a job: Unemployed

• Unemployment Rate = D/(C+D)

Page 19: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Is the unemployment rate biased downward?

Page 20: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Is the unemployment rate biased downward?

• The unemployment rate doesn’t count underemployment (those that would like to work full time, but only work part time)

Page 21: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Is the unemployment rate biased downward?

• The unemployment rate doesn’t count underemployment (those that would like to work full time, but only work part time)

• The “discouraged worker effect”: Those that have given up trying to find a job are counted as not in the labor force rather than unemployed

Page 22: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Is the unemployment rate biased upward?

Page 23: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Is the unemployment rate biased upward?

• Selection bias: those that are unemployed are more likely to be home to answer the survey.

Page 24: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Is the unemployment rate biased upward?

• Selection bias: those that are unemployed are more likely to be home to answer the survey.

• Moral hazard: due to unemployment insurance, it is difficult to tell how hard individuals are trying to find work

Page 25: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Other Problems

• Should we interpret unemployment statistics differently when population demographics change? (e.g. individuals under the age of 25 are much more likely to be unemployed)

Page 26: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Other Problems

• Should we interpret unemployment statistics differently when population demographics change? (e.g. individuals under the age of 25 are much more likely to be unemployed)

• Should we count military personnel as employed or unemployed

Page 27: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Empirical Questions

• What exactly are you trying to measure? Is your variable consistent with what you’re trying to measure?

• How is your variable measured?

• Is your variable in real or nominal terms?

Page 28: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Example: Suppose that you have $100 to invest in either the US or Argentina. Given the current

interest rates, where should you invest?

Argentina

• i = 12.8%

United States

• i = 4.25%

Page 29: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Example: Suppose that you have $100 to invest in either the US or Argentina. Given the current

interest rates, where should you invest?

Argentina

• i = 12.8%

• Annual inflation rate = 14.3%

United States

• i = 4.25%

• Annual inflation rate = 2.4%

Page 30: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Example: Suppose that you have $100 to invest in either the US or Argentina. Given the current

interest rates, where should you invest?

Argentina

• i = 12.8%

• Annual inflation = 14.3%

• Real (inflation adjusted) return = -1.5%

United States

• i = 4.25%

• Annual inflation = 2.4%

• Real (inflation adjusted) return = 1.85%

Page 31: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Real vs. Nominal Variables

Page 32: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Real vs. Nominal Variables

• Nominal variables are measured in terms of some currency (e.g. your annual income is $70,000 per year)

Page 33: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Real vs. Nominal Variables

• Nominal variables are measured in terms of some currency (e.g. your nominal income is $70,000 per year)

• Real (inflation adjusted) variables are measured in terms of some commodity (e.g. your real income is 7,000 pizzas per year)

Page 34: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Real vs. Nominal Variables

• Nominal variables are measured in terms of some currency (e.g. your nominal income is $70,000 per year)

• Real (inflation adjusted) variables are measured in terms of some commodity (e.g. if pizzas cost $10/pizza your real income is 7,000 pizzas per year)

• Real = Nominal/Price ( 7000 = 70,000/10 )

Page 35: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Empirical Questions

• What exactly are you trying to measure? Is your variable consistent with what you’re trying to measure?

• How is your variable measured?

• Is your variable in real or nominal terms?

• Is your variable seasonally adjusted?

Page 36: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Example: Seasonality

Retail Sales

250000

270000

290000

310000

330000

350000

370000

Jan-

01

Mar

-01

May

-01

Jul-

01

Sep-

01

Nov

-01

Jan-

02

Mar

-02

May

-02

Jul-

02

Sep-

02

Nov

-02

Jan-

03

Mar

-03

May

-03

Page 37: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Components of Economics Data

• Economic data series are generally believed to have four main components

Page 38: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Components of Economics Data

• Economic data series are generally believed to have four main components• Trend (many years)

Page 39: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Components of Economics Data

• Economic data series are generally believed to have four main components• Trend (many years)• Business Cycle (1-2 yrs)

Page 40: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Components of Economics Data

• Economic data series are generally believed to have four main components• Trend (many years)• Business Cycle (1-2 yrs)• Seasonal ( < 1 yr)

Page 41: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Components of Economics Data

• Economic data series are generally believed to have four main components• Trend (many years)• Business Cycle (1-2 yrs)• Seasonal ( < 1 yr)• Noise (very short term)

Page 42: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Components of Economics Data

• Economic data series are generally believed to have four main components• Trend (many years)• Business Cycle (1-2 yrs)• Seasonal ( < 1 yr)• Noise (very short term)• Typically, we are not interested in the seasonal

component, so we remove it.

Page 43: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Seasonally Adjusted Retail Sales

255000265000275000285000295000305000315000325000335000345000355000

Jan-

01

Apr

-01

Jul-

01

Oct

-01

Jan-

02

Apr

-02

Jul-

02

Oct

-02

Jan-

03

Apr

-03

NSASA

Page 44: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Empirical Questions

• What exactly are you trying to measure? Is your variable consistent with what you’re trying to measure?

• How is your variable measured?

• Is your variable in real or nominal terms?

• Is your variable seasonally adjusted?

• Is your variable annualized?

Page 45: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Example: Annualizing

• A 90-day T-Bill currently sells for $99.80 per $100 of face value. This implies a 90-Day return of around .2%

Page 46: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Example: Annualizing

• A 90-day T-Bill currently sells for $99.80 per $100 of face value. This implies a 90-Day return of around .2%

• A 5 year STRIP currently sells for around $90.25 per $100 of face value. This implies a return of around 10.8%

Page 47: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Example: Annualizing

• A 90-day T-Bill currently sells for $99.80 per $100 of face value. This implies a 90-Day return of around .2%

• A 5 year STRIP currently sells for around $90.25 per $100 of face value. This implies a return of around 10.8%

• How can we compare these two rates of return?

Page 48: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Example: Annualizing

• Annualizing converts any data series to a common time frame (1 year)

Page 49: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Example: Annualizing

• Annualizing converts any data series to a common time frame (1 year)

• Assuming that the 90 day interest rate stays constant at .2%, the annual return to 90 day T-bills would be (1.002)(1.002)(1.002)(1.002) = 1.008 = .8%

Page 50: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Example: Annualizing

• Annualizing converts any data series to a common time frame (1 year)

• Assuming that the 90 day interest rate stays constant at .2%, the annual return to 90 day T-bills would be (1.002)(1.002)(1.002)(1.002) = 1.008 = .8%

• What would your annual return need to be to receive a (compounded) 5 year return of 10.8%

(1+x)(1+x)(1+x)(1+x)(1+x) = 1.108

x = 1.02 (2%)

Page 51: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

Example: Annualizing

• Annualizing converts any data series to a common time frame (1 year)

• Assuming that the 90 day interest rate stays constant at .2%, the annual return to 90 day T-bills would be (1.002)(1.002)(1.002)(1.002) = 1.008 = .8%

• What would your annual return need to be to receive a (compounded) 5 year return of 10.8%(1+x)(1+x)(1+x)(1+x)(1+x) = 1.108x = 1.02 (2%)

• These two annualized rates can now be compared