Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital,...

33
ARL Fall Association Meeting October 4, 2017 Jan Fransen ([email protected]) Shane Nackerud ([email protected]) University of Minnesota Libraries Using Library Data to Improve the Student Experience Library Impact on Student Success

Transcript of Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital,...

Page 1: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

ARL Fall Association Meeting October 4, 2017

Jan Fransen ([email protected]) Shane Nackerud ([email protected])

University of Minnesota Libraries

Using Library Data to Improve the Student Experience

Library Impact on Student Success

Page 2: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

Back in 2011…

Page 3: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

And how do you measure success?

Are there correlations between library use and student success measures?

Page 4: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

What are we tracking?

Library Data

Page 5: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tekmagika/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0

Privacy vs. “personally identifiable information”

Page 6: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

User Y used an E-Journal

User X used a Book

Tracking specific users tied to broad, general use

Page 7: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

Workstation Data • Logins

Reference Data • Online Reference • Peer Research

Consultants

Circulation Data • Alma • ILL (both Loans and Articles)

Instruction Data • Workshops • Course Integrated • Online Intro to Library

Research tutorial

Digital Data • Databases • E-Journals • E-Books • Website/Other • Reserves

Page 8: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

And how do you measure success?

Are there correlations between library use and student success measures?

Page 9: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

Grade Point Average

Page 10: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

Retention

Page 11: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive
Page 12: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

o ir.umn.edu

Page 13: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

College Environment Freshman Seminar Access to Success program Residence Hall College

Prior Academics ACT/SAT Score AP credits

Demographics Gender Race/Ethnicity Pell Grant Recipient Veteran Status First Generation college student

Page 14: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

Correlative analysis

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Carls

onCe

nter

for A

llied

Hea

lthCE

HDCF

ANS

CCE

CBS

Colle

ge o

f Des

ign

CLA

Phar

mac

yCS

EVe

tMed

Gra

d Sc

hool

Hum

phre

yM

ed S

choo

lDe

ntris

tyN

ursin

gPu

blic

Hea

lthO

vera

ll Pe

rcen

t Usin

g

Digital: Graduate Student Use

Demographic analysis

Page 15: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

https://www.flickr.com/photos/b-tal/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/

Page 16: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

• Transparency • Opt In or Opt Out? • Institutional Review Board • Level of collection

• Personally identifiable information and identifiable materials/services/resources

• Data retention and security • University policies? • State laws?

Privacy considerations

Page 17: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

http://superfriends.wikia.com/wiki/File:Justice_League_Meeting_Room.jpg

CC BY-SA 3.0

Seat at the Learning Analytics table

Page 18: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

Research Studies with the Office of Institutional Research

Groundwork

Page 19: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

The importance of benchmarking

What percent of undergrads will use your library this semester?

Page 20: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

Library Users, 77%

23%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Percent of Undergrad Library Users Fall 2011

Page 21: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

Library Users, 77%

Library Users, 88%

23% 12%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Percent of Undergrad Library Users Fall 2011 vs. Fall 2016

Page 22: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

• For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive correlation to:

• Grade Point Average • Retention to Spring and to second year • Indicators of Scholarship (as measured by SERU) • Indicators of Academic Engagement (as measured

by SERU) • When controlling for Demographics, Academic

Background, and Student Experience variables (and other factors for some studies)

2011 First Year Cohort

Page 23: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive
Page 24: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

In other words, people who used electronic resources were ALMOST TWICE AS LIKELY to graduate in four years vs. those who did not.

Use Times more like to graduate in four years

Times more likely to be enrolled in four years

Any Library 1.441 1.389

Electronic Resources 1.924 1.450

Books 1.337 <no correlation>

Workstations <no correlation> <no correlation>

Library Instruction Class <no correlation> 1.402

Reference <no correlation> <no correlation>

Latest Findings (2011 First Year Cohort)

Page 25: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive
Page 26: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

Does the rest of the University of Minnesota care?

Is this just a library thing?

Page 27: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

Provost Karen Hanson Remarks at the Libraries IMLS National Medal

Celebration, July 19, 2017

[The Libraries] are critical to supporting student success, which is one of our highest priorities at the University. Libraries researchers have gathered compelling data that indicate that undergraduates are more successful (as gauged by higher GPAs, higher retention rates, and higher 4-year graduation rates) when they use our Libraries.

Page 28: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive
Page 29: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive
Page 30: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

B. Pursel and D. Wham, Penn State’s Predictive Modeling Journey. Presentation to Unizin LA CoP. March 3, 2017.

Page 31: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

What interventions work best? What can we do during the semester? Is/How is library use predictive of success measures?

Next up

Page 32: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

APLUS

Testy McTest Library Activity—Spring 2017

Intro to Library Workshop—1/21/2017 Checked out 2 items—2/5/2017 Viewed 3 e-journals—2/6/2017

Peers Me

Library use this semester

Student’s class gets

library instruction

Student has no measurable

interaction with library during

subsequent two weeks

Advisor notified and

can reach out

Possibilities to explore

Page 33: Library Impact on Student Success · • For 2011 first year students, use of the library (digital, circulation, workstation, instruction, reference) in first year had a strong, positive

• A project of the University of Minnesota Libraries, in collaboration with the University of Minnesota Office of Institutional Research

• Krista Soria (OIR) • Shane Nackerud (Libraries)

• Jan Fransen (Libraries) • Kate Peterson (Libraries) • Kristen Mastel (Libraries)

• More information about the project on our blog at z.umn.edu/LDSS

• Find a list of our publications at z.umn.edu/LDSSPubs

Library Data & Student Success