Research libraries (in general) would see the most benefit from multi-institutional models for:
Libraries & Institutional Content Management Systems
description
Transcript of Libraries & Institutional Content Management Systems
Libraries & Institutional Content Management Systems
Pamela F. Cabe MLIS, AHIPCoy C. Carpenter LibraryWake Forest University School of Medicine
About Us
Institution comprised of Wake Forest
University Baptist Medical Centerand
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
About Us
Carpenter Library serves both entities.
The Department of Public Relations and Marketing, a department of the Medical Center, is responsible for the institution’s web site and departmental web space.
What is CMS?
Content Management System “A content management system (CMS)
supports the creation, management, distribution, publishing, and discovery of corporate information.” (Robertson, 2003, KM Column).
A way of standardizing web development at our institution.
Why CMS?
Volume of the WWW Institutional Branding-sites would be clearly
defined as being part of the institution.
Why CMS?
Sites began to contain errors, missing images, broken links, old information, incorrect health information, etc.
Why was the library concerned?
Because we’re librarians!
Why was the library concerned?
Bulk of library budget supports electronic resources.
These resources are physically housed on the library’s web site.
Look, feel, organization and usability of the library’s web site is key to properly showcase these electronic resources.
CMS Software and Template Design
Microsoft Content Management Server A template was designed by an
independent web consultant.
WFUBMC Template
Medical School Disagreement
Medical School disagreed with template. The Medical School Web Task Force
was formed.
School of Medicine Template Modifications
Issues Encountered with Conversion to CMS
Site Conversion Process Web Editing Non-Compatible Technology Ineffective Site Search Engine Push of Live Content to Server
Site Conversion Process Issues
LONG process
Solutions Let independent firm do conversion and
then correct any errors. Do the conversion myself.
Site Conversion Process Issues
Pluses Learned CMS software. Streamlined our existing site. Redesigned the site look and organization.
Minuses LONG arduous process Editing tools formerly used to manage site
do not work with CMS software.
Web Editing Issues
Microsoft Word OR
Microsoft CMS WYSIWYG
Web Editing Issues
Solution CMS WYSIWYG
Pluses Changes are made inside the Browser, preview of
pages is easy.
Minuses WYSIWYG is clunky, difficult to use and produces
almost indecipherable HTML. Technologies utilized in the former site don’t
function in the CMS.
Microsoft CMS Web Editing Software
Microsoft CMS Web Editing Software
Non-Compatible Technology
Javascript DHTML Shockwave Files XML Forms
Forms
Forms
Forms and other Non-Compatible Technology
Solutions Negotiated web space outside the CMS
template. The Medical School is investigating a forms
program to handle forms, Sharepoint.OrForms will remain outside CMS on different server.
Removed Javascript and DHTML
Forms and other Non-Compatible Technology
Pluses Site simplification Removed additional movement
Minuses Removed ability to use advanced
scripting/technology
Site Search Issues
Patrons had ability to search library site. The CMS template included a site
search box which instead of searching the library’s site would search the entire institutional site.
Site Search Issues
Solutions We were able to create a faux template page which
was outside the CMS to house our Google! Site search.
Pluses Google site search works great.
Minuses The ineffective search box is still on our site in the
template. Patrons can only access the library search from our
site.
Site Search “Wireless Access”
New Site Search Using Google!
New Site Search Using Google!
Push of Content to the Server
Old site was transferred via FTP. New site changes are sent daily during a
global update.
Push of Content to Server
Solutions Database content (electronic journal
information, electronic textbook listings) will be saved live on the server.
Obtained permission to request a manual push when necessary.
Push of Content to Server
Pluses Databases changes are instantaneous. Databases owners can edit and see results
immediately.
Minuses No live control over web content.
Final Result?
Carpenter Library’s New Site
Strategies for Negotiating with Institutional Web Masters
Get to know institutional web masters. Identify issues you may encounter
Technology Issues Editing Issues Updating Issues
Use your statistics. Instead of flashy technology, use flashy
graphics to fill the void.
Serenity Now!
Accept the things you cannot change!