LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 283.1 - # 1 Exhibit 12.23.2010 Memoranum by Juge Robreno - Attachment...

8/6/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 283.1 - # 1 Exhibit 12.23.2010 Memoranum by Juge Robreno - Attachment 1.283.1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/liberi-v-taitz-cd-ca-2831-1-exhibit-12232010-memoranum-by-juge 1/15

Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 12123110 of 15

3H TI':g CI.TITSS STATES T}TSITRIfrT C*I3S?rOR fltE se$"6ft:q l3srR3c" o" FEbI!{$SLVA}{IA

LISA LfBnR;, et al., : C?VTL ACTISbI: N0. 0g*189S

Pl"alrrtif f s,:

\r. i

:

ORLY 'IAtTtr, eL &1- . , ::

:)efefids.nts. :

Hsl'lCRAl.ltUttt

ElUnRSgf, R*SRHN#' iI. secember 23. ?010

r. IrfTRSDffiTf,OT{

Hef$r* the f,ourt are FlainEiffs' written Motion far

Emergency Temp$rnry Rasf,raining Order and Defendant. Taitz's oral

r*ot.ion f*r a temp*rary restraining arder. Th€ Ccurt read ths

Elartiest papers, r*viewed ehe dacumenlary evidrlrcs, and held a

hea.riag on the matler <:rr D€cefilber ?0, ;0:"*. F*r th€ reas+ns set

farth b*}sr*, b$th rroti$ns *ri]-l be denied aud the C*ure #auLiorlg

the pa.rtie*. eepeu*"alty the atstcrneys in the cese, ss bo ihe

prosEleci $f futurs Eanctians.

rI. r'ncruBl strcKcRoultD

On May 4, ?009, tslaintiffs Lina Li!:eri ("Liberi") ,

rhilip ,J, ISergi, Seq. (sserg"), the Latu Offj-ees of trhilip J. Berg,

-a-

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#:6341





Evelyn Adams a/k1a Mo{flila H {"Adams"l, Llsa ostella i"Oete}Ia"},

and & flxceL Gl<ebal {ccl"l.ecri-ve1y. "Flair:tLffs'} ini*iated rhi.s

defas:ation, libel-, ar:d sla.nder actian agai:net Defeadant* $rly

Tait*, Ssq.. *DS i"Ta-aLz"l, Defe:rd *u.r F.reedo$s Fgr,ind*tions, Irrc.

("DOFF"], Neil ,Sankey, The Sanhey Firm and Sankey Inveet"i.gat-lons,

Inc. ic+ll"r*ctl"vely, !t$a:rhey"], Edgar l{gi,c, {aren Ha.ie, Flaing

Radi*, KpRl.I AII 151-0, Bar It- Fars's, FLaine Ra*io Sletsr+?"k

(ccllae*iv*ly. 'the Hales'), and ilnda $u* tse3cher {cot}e*tiveiy,*Defendants").1

In slrtn, sl.*intiffs ansl Defendantrs ere part of fihe*bi*th*ro Hx)ve$renl, *rhich ls ccurpriged *f lndividuafs who beU-eve

that Pr*si**nE obama is ineligible to be President *f lhe {}nited

StaLes because he was hoxn in Keaya. At one tirne, P}aint,iffs and

Defendants worked foget'ber co atLempt to prove President Obama's

ill*gitirna*y but inffght,ir:g a$orrg them led to this Laweuib.

$pecifically, Plai:;tiff Phi),ip e*rg accr:sed **fer:*arrt

srly Taita sf irrproperLy publishing lhe sacial secur*ty nurnber rrf

his pa.ralegal., Lisa Lil:eri, along with defamatory information

r:egarding t'ihert's pa*t history of criminal activity, $n her

' Some of thss* Fsrfies have a Long and c*mptlc*tedliEigafion hintory. S*f, "#.,..9., Berg r{. QFam+, 585 F.sd ?34 (3dcir. 2009) ; S,hodes v. -Ula(}psnal^d, 6?fi F. $upp. 2d 1-363 {M"D" Ga.

2OO9) {impoeing $zCI,s00 *anction o!1 sounsel Or}y Taitz fr;r use ofthe 3.eg*.1 pro#es$ f*r an 5"mpr*per purl:*se], Aff 'S Rhpdes v.gae*+aald, ?slf fI.S. epp" tsxrs 5340 fJ.lth Cir. f{ar. 15, 2S10}.?his lit.ig*ri+r} appeer$ ds be pare *f *kis overaSl di*p+** *{Itcrrgthe p*rt'ie*"

-2-






ryebei*e- llefend.a-*ts Sdg*r arrd Care* Hals, **d l{eil $ankey *r*

eEeentialiy accused of workS^ng with $x' Taits to defanle

Fla.i"ntiffs. T1re Ftale clefendanEs awrr an int*rnet radio sf.atlar: irr

Texas on which Dr. Talt,a appeared. NeiI Sankey is a private

inve*rigator in calif*rrria, atlege<3If hlred by *r. Taita *n h*r

q**$t to *deslray' PSaintiff* Berg *n* Lib*rl'

rrr. pR0cnnBRet Brsfonr

on May 4, 20$9, Slaintiffs filed thelr complainl along

w**h arr Erttergerrcy 1"1*ti*n far an Injr:nct*.*r: and,/or Tercp*raryRestrairring Order. Sn *t*y ?2, 2**9, *ef*ndsnts Niel Sarikey,

saxkey T:rvestigacior:s, an€ Saakey Investigflti+rrs. Inc, t"$axkey

Defend*nbs'I fil-ed a !llq:t.i+n to Dj-smiss. On Fl^ay 26, ?0Sg

Defendant Linda Eelcher f iled a Motj.on to Oiemiss. on May 26,

IS09 S+f,endants Edg*r itaie aad Caren H*3* (*U*le Defendanis/)

filed a lr!+tion to si.srrils*.

Sn Hay 28, ?tl$9, Defenda.nts Orty Taitz and Def*nd tlur

Freedoms Foundattons, Inc. (*Taitz Oefendants"i filed a til(}Lioa to

Dismiss Due to Lack of .]urisdictian, an Answer, and an Oppositj-on

io the tlotion for an Injr.rnction. on t"funs 9o 20s9, Plalat{ff*

resp*n*ed to lhese r**bi*ns. on Ju;:e 1.1, 2**9, Plaintitfs

resp*nd*d to the l{*ii<>ns t$ trj-sfitiss fi}*d hy Sankey Fef,*ndfr{:fs,

Beleher, and Hale Defendanfs. On Jrxre 23, 2S09, Plaintiffs re*

filed their Emergerrcy Motion for an InjuncBion or Temporary






Qestrai*ing Order, ?aitE llefenda:rfs responded sn Ju:ee 24, ****,

On ,.Tune ?6, 2*09, this Courh J"esrred the fsllowing five

ord,ers: {1) granEing P}aintJff ts motion and dismissing trefendanns

#ames Sundguist a:rd Rock Salt Pul:lishing; (21 denying r,rithout

prejud.ic*r Plai.ntlff '* *wo X$ergency Flot.i*nE far an lnjur:*tio*r

*nd/ox a Tempcrary R*strai*irrg Order and *erryirrg a13 parti*s'

rlst.i(}}:s t(} *trike; (3) c)f,dering thaf rls fuscher ft+Ci$n$ h* fi]"ed

uiu.houh leave of the f,ourr and LhaE Fertrie$ musr requege chifi by

lett"*r ho the Court; ta) granting Defendant Taitz's lilotious to

Set. .h,side Defau}.t' .Iudgmunt anC denyirrg Flaint,iff "s rnany req*eslsf<rr dsfau3t juBg:*ents; *.*d {5i issui*g a ru}e to slrew *au** w}:y

Lbe csrrtplaint should n*t be se'rered and trarrEferred.

ofl July ??, 2009, based upon a leLt,er 6ent tc th* fourL

by Slaintiffs, the eourt ordered that Fl"ainriff's new Em*rgency

l{*t,ion f,cr ehe Isruance *f an Injuncti$R .sr Restraining Order be

d*sket,ed. E+fende'nt{s 8elcher, }lale, and Tailz respanded *n

31t9ru$t 3, eS09. ghs fisrrrt. lrel-* a tieari.ng sn.august 7, e0S3, ar:d

denieel Flaintiff's mfiLl#n on August.lfi, 2frO9, as well aE denyi*g

many other rnotlons,

Ot: August 1"4, 2*O9, Plaintj.ffs app**led the Court,ts

des"ial *f their n:ctie* fsr an injunctisn or reslraining nr**r t.o

ihe fhir$ Circuit. fx, Ilecenber 9, 2Q&9, t.his ca.se was pi*.ced i-rr

suspelrse pe::ding detsrminat:un of llre appeal. {gee da*, n$. S}.iOn May 26, 2010, the Thlrd Circuit granted Flaintiffs. moti$n to






PlaintiffE' prewior:* requast.s rrere by lett€r t<: ihe C+urt, oxr

secec*ber 13, 2s13, pur#*ane i<r the ?hj"r* tircgit's directir:n,

ihi,c Car*rH scheduled a he*ring on Plaintiffs' moii+rr f*r De*ereber

20, 20I"S.

rv- #xtRrg$:c*rolr

Jurisdictj.on for tkis acEion is predicated *porr

cliversiry of cicizenship" eB U.s.c. $ 1332. The. citiuenship of

all parei.es is as foll.r;rwp, For t*he Ftainhif f s r Eerg and Liberi

atre p€rr:ssylvania ciliz*:ns; Adaug ie an Gklahorsa citiz*n; *rrd

Csle}l* and Gc Global ar* ditizexts af l'[sr* Jereay, Far

Befends*ts: Taitz, nQFf, anti sankey are citizens of C*Lif*rni*;

SundEuict and Rock $at[ Publishirg are cit.ise::s oE ]isrrr J€]rsey;

and **l"cher and t.he Halsp are citizens of Texas-

v" t#rr$rs 30R e tuHFfiR*Rx REs:rRer$rH# sRSgR

On Fecemkr 20r ?030, the C*$rt beld a hearing

regarding FJ-aintiffe' m*sf, recent, EmerEency HoE.ion f,+r a

Temporary Restrainlng Or<ler. Plaintiffs fhiltip Bergr Liea

Liberi, a*d ,lisa Sstella ?sere preseni, 8arg, a member *f the

penngySva*ia bar, r*pr*#ented all rf the P}*i.ntiffs, kfendant

OrIy ?nit*. a member r"lf the Califarnia bar, wag aJ"so pre$ent,.

TaiLz represented herself arrd Defend Our Freedoms Foundation. At

the tmaring, the CEurt rcc*ived and adr,i-tt*d a nurnber of exhi.niLs





Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 12123110 PageT of 15

*ffered by Lh* pa.rties. h*ard argunent, ar':d hearcl t*xti:tt*::y fr*m

three w i.tne**ea -

Fl"aintif,fs argued that DefendanLs Orly Taitz and Linda

Eel.*her- as srt13 as a thirC F€rtsy, G*+ff Sf-aples. crsated a

website. lrl,Lp;ilAisalib*fi,.**m, in retaSiation for their filing

an apFe.al in this case. The Frebsite i* set*up as if it was

created by l"riberi- The websj.te inclades se>rual innuendos, fals*

sttteraerrb$, and false cximinal hist+ry, all of w?ri*h;l$lFear t* be

designed bo paint Liberi in a:: uofev*rai:Ie light. Hcarever,

r,iheri dld not establi#h the website or give permi.oui"on to anyone

lo estab].ich the *ebsite ir: ?:er r:ana*, Liberi f i:e* *n online

*buse foxr* with ttre dsr*ain regislry ar:d aa onli*e abuse report

with pfiV,fi.#.ypllotect,.arq. T&e dcma.in was originally reported uc)

be regj.slered bo a Lisa tlberi of N*ir<:bi rvith an ema.ll addrees

*f cer:victadfeLaaaliealiberi,ror&- As $f ftol;r, eh* t*sbsite iE

aSlegediy xegf*tered t$ * S*off St*ple* of Te:*as.

Flaintiffs further alleged f,haL taita. Seleher, and

$taples sent e*rails encouraging peopSe tc view lhe website.

fhese eerail* *ere senf, Lt: emeil adgrsss*s fou*d in l,ibesi'e +ld

email acc*untr siG thai, lrer friends and carriacls wauSd believe tire

emaj-I tras from her. Flainuiffs alno allege thal when trhey tried

bo ge: r*lj.ef via a letter e<r this Ceurl, the Sefendants

f,etaSiaLe€ by p$st*:E tbe leiter cn li:s website,

Defendant Taita recpo-ded trilet plai*t*ff* hEve sc

-7-

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 of 15 Page ID#:6347





*vid*nce that she was invnlved ln creating b,he websit.e

ht*p:-lll,isalibefi,.,g"*m. Taitr further arg'r.red thaE anything posted

ahaut Liberi on t.tre websiLe which is in lfaLta'fi conLrol.

www-r.gg.lyEaitzEEq.c*SHB we.s truthful and l:,r:t elander*us ii.s-:,iberi's *r$ugis}.dlt" asd *riiniral hist*ryi . Taitx furtber a).I*g*d

that trl*ini.iffe are r*t*I5ating againsf, hsr f*r being a

"whistle.blorter" about f-iheri' e crlminal hJ-gtory a*d involvenent

wiBh mon€tary donations from the publlc.

Plaintiffs' first witness was hisa Liberi. L,ib+ri

tesuified that gh* rtid nct rreate the w*heitehitFjlll"aeaeibgf*i.**gglrt. *i* not arrthsrize its creati*n, and ha.s

not 6e$t euails frcrm th* r*ebsiEe's eruail aec$unt

c+f-rrri,ctedfe1oneLis.a.Lltserl.Cp_.m- Lj-beri alscr test.ified Lhel taitu

tried to hire a "hj.t-man' ro hann her and her famj"Iy and that

I'aitz has enccur;eg*d ctherg Lc harlfl her **:i- on cross-

exami**ti*n, Libert **sl*ed*S that sbe wag a *o*vicued felon axd

that ch€ had no dj.r+ci *sidence l-ir:king th* r+ebsite to Fefe::d*xts

Eel*her $r Taitu. Iri,berj. q.lso did rr+t prsssnL any cr*dible

evidence to supporf her claims of murder solicitation arrd

kidxapi::g attempts- nuring her testimcny, Liberi was often

comba*ive a*d ev*.sirt&, arrd rauch cf hrer teet,imo*y t*as argnrment

xitkol.rt factxil] basix, F{rr Lhese reasc:n#, *h* Courl f inds t}r**

Iriberi's testiftony wag nol credi$ie.Plaintif,fo' *econd witness wafi Lia*. S#tel:a. Ostella

-8-






testified thfr.b she had vrorked for Taif.z a# her web de*igner- she

also assi*ted Taitz i*iih heriuebsiue

aad aoE+ei*.ted paypaS asc*r"rnts for col3*c*ing d<s:eat"ia*s to lhe

site, CIn sr$ss-€xamina*.inn, OFtelSa *cr:ceded that she has ?+cked

taitz +ul of her r*ebsiHe and htlr

pssosiated paypal accounLs. Oste.Lla also concedad that she only

had disc$v*rt* a link **t*reen €eoff S*o,pl.ee and the w*bsite

ilt--tJllll;i*91-j$egi' gp,tsi, rrdlb l,<> Defe:]dal:t* ?;ritc an* Fslcher. r,ike

r.iberi, Ostella was efBen cambative and suasive during her

testimony. and rnuch +f her testimony u/as &rgument with<put. factualbaeis. Th*ffore, Lhe C*urt als+ f ind.s *h*t Ostella'$ teFt,i{tony

ldas nol cs+dible,

Defendant, Taitz called one witness, Plainliff Fhillip

Berg. Berg t,estified regarding his previ.ous relationchip wittr

Geatf St*ples. Lhat Staple* diri w+b d**ign fer BerE or* *

v61':.rr!leer b*,ais, Elerg'* *est.iElorry was e1** comba.t{ve, svasive,

and argtrmentative and tha Cour', did noe find his testinnny to be

helpful for entabl-iehing a factual record.? At the conclusion of

his dir*rcL examination by faitz, Berg asked Lo reep*n hls cas€ to

call f*its etr Ehe stand, cihich tshe Court de:ried-

?he parties alsc offered various dccu::le*ts into

' Tt,.e Csurt finds that tllelhe queelions asked rl:€ra 5:artiallyguesl:ic,t:tc wsye confueing, hosCile,baiting the *ritnesses.

ttitn*gs' *.ostile reacticns tctriggered by ?aile^ ?aitz's*"r:d *fL*n r*$i: to the level of

-9-






evidence. the Court ffnds nhat the documents l"aeked any evidence

of arrthenliealisn anrfl f,hus, f inds rnuch of the dncuruentary

evidsnce to be unrel"l"able.

e. l"eq+3 sepq#rd

PreSimir:e.ry injur:cLlve relief is safi elciraordinary

remedy" and "should bs granted only ln limited circumstances.o

Kos pharmacesgtqalp",. Inc- v" Andrx Csrp,, 369 F-3d 70o, 708 (3d

Cir, ?*fr4) {citing *rexicae__1e.1=__&*-5e1**-g*--s.. Fixnact * Csnsery.$

.Pf*qgEgIB-- In€., 42 F.3d 1421" 3.427 {3d Cir, 1994}t. *A party*eekfng a prelirnisarg inju*ctio* rsust shcru: {3.} a Sikelihcod *f

success +n the rn*rihei {2} tkat iL wil"} suffer irreparable harm

if the injuncti$rr io denied," (3I Ehat granf,ing preliminary rell.ef

will nat resulb in everr greater harm to tlre nonmoving party; and

t4) [hat the pr"rb]iq int,erest fa-Lrors s*ch rel$.ef "- KgE

.fhermece-sEi"ea1s, 35$ F.3€ at ?OE icitiag 4Llggheay Enersv. InS"-.

Y. ffiE* lse-*, 371- f'.}d 153, 15s {l* Cir. 1P9#}}.

I* Lhis ras*, *tirher parly pr*vai)"s ;*xd neilher is the

vi*tor. The C*urt will Seny bottr motiq:rts f*r a tearporary

rertraining order for th+ reasons that f*llow.

F - Pra1nti{tc.1.*bta.t@Es.$s.y ?*n$qgasv RF-#qHs,i ipq

Srts!Firsb, Fl.ai*tiff* fail l<: sho?, thrf they a.ol'rld fik*ly

-1"0-





Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Ftled 12123110 of 15

succ*ed {::: the merit*- Th* evidence Fr<lf fr*r*d by the ?l*!r:tiffs,

bs,eh *s S**rnents and as t*i"tness test.irn**y. $a# notr f**nd *s) be

sredibl* or reliabie. SLaintiffs failed Co prove that named

Defendants Taitz and Bel.cher were dJ"rectJ"y connected to the

'*ehsit*. The orrly svidsnce Plaintif fs provided r+as an

unsr.rbst,antialed aSlega*icn tlrat one Ge*ff Staples, reporteSly t-he

cparrrt*r of the webeit*, h*d a previou* rel.alionship rtit;h S*rg

and nor* has a connectinn tc TaiLz -

$econd, Slai.ntiffs also fail" ttl show thaf Uhey wnuj-d

suffe:: *rreparable hs,r:a unl*ss the Csurt *:*re t+ issrl@ a

Ee{apsrery Reetra.ining *rd*r.'the r.r*h**.i*, htgp#JiEgg:j&*.9..i Lto:lCI*i! t

is r:q: lernger avalLa3:L€ tcr t,he pubiic. Additionally, z:k*,

all*gations Ehat Tails hired a hib-man and attempted tcr kidnap

OsteLla's children wers not proven by any credible evidence.

As Ptaiaiiffs' BKlt.ian faits ::nder Lhe first and *ec+nd

pr*ags, t.h* Cc*rt rsill not *onciatre the an*lysis ss thi* *s a

conjunctive tesE. T'!:uB, Flaint.iffs- l,totf*n for an- Ernekgentry

temporary ResEraining Srder will tre denied.

e" " -?e t e.Bd-a;:L..fi r ry EALt#js- Hp ! i qs._{qs-srLsne rq e-nsy, Tqmp$r arv

S+gtraJ.ning or*g;

trr.rring Eh* hearing, $efenriarit ?*.itz ar:gued rF:at i* is

the Plai"nbif,f,s EhaE ars engagerl in harassing irer and t'hat tt isshe Lhat needs protecLion from them- Th€ eourt wj-ll treat this

-1:.-





case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 1212311A of 15

arg:*.nent a# an sra"l ]4*iion fcr a terr$:*rary Restraining Sx*er

agai::*l FLairreiffs. f:ef***a::E Taitz'# {a+t**n *i11 eiJ"s* b*

deni*d.

First, Taita falls bo shord thf,"f *he will likely prevail

on thcs me1:its. Taitx *nlleges that FlainLiffs are c+ntinuing ts

bring a*Li*rrs agai:as* h*r l-rr retaliati<*x clf her exer*i** +f her

fre* speecl': :'ights b* "hl"*tl the r*h!*tl** *ci Plair:*iffs

inpropriehy {j..e, { Berg l**ting l,iberir a *Glllricted f*}qrn, hasdle

ilonaBionsl. However, th* C#urt finds that raitz did not affer

cx+dibt* svides:ce f,+ e$tahltsh Ehal ghe fs likely t+ *utceied iacha cls"itn-

se*orrd, Tai*x fails t'c s?:sw ixrepar*ble harr*. ?i?* only

harm that Taitz uould allegedly suffer ie t+ *ontin'lre *c have to

fitigate thls c1aim, Thi* is not irreparabl* harm-

&s Detendax* f,ailr'e tfloti+n fai}"s ur:der t.he fi"rst and

se**}r3* prcnE#, t'he Cc}lir* wi33 B*t c{i:}ti:r** Ltr* analy*i* es *hi$

is a *#nju$*tir.e te*t- Thus, Defenfls$t Sf,Iy f,aiLr"s FI$Li*n fsr a

Temtr)orery Restraining' Order r,rill be denied.

vI " F#X,JtTX#bt rO TSIS *$$H3' S SBSSR 1*O SGVER Jl*ltr t1RNqSS'HIr

stn Jr-rae 3, ?*t*' lhe C$l}rt #sv*ftd thisr s*ti*?: an*

tranef,err*d the +Iain* t+ *ach Def**clartt'r hom* jur*sdic*i"*r:, a

decisi*n pending app*41". ?he parties/ a*t.it1ns and argurnnnt

relaling tc; Fl*irrtj.ff*{ rflcr*i f,ece*t Ern*rg*;r*y }4oti*r: tur *l

* LA.






?**p*rary Re*tr*.i.r:1:rg #r*err fusthev #uElp$xus ri:i* C{}tlrt's

reasoning as t+ why ihis **rse shor:ld be nevereql ar:d tsansferr*d,

Frior to the pcheduled tr*arinE multiple S*fendants

{sther thar: *,i?* Eefg-faJ"tx S:arbiee} **ntacLei Lhe ft:ff.rt E*

*lrpr*ss eha* i.* trt+ulC b* *** erqlerisiv* frnd inc*nv*t?*"*nt ta tnake

it t{i a hearing in Pennsylvarria thau was schedul*d. wlthin five

days. Theee *ori{ier:is adrl weight L+ t"}re f,*:urth "pr*vate facLsr#

*rticlrlat*d by the Thlrd f,i"rcuit irr c+nsidering a transfer,- the*,

3s, th* #+*v*ni*r:ce of th* Fa.sties *s ixrdicaied by th*lr relaeirre

phyeical and f fnancial condi-kians, Sse il}tUere_*:e.**$.l;a.te_"He.rml$#*

k"-, 55 F.3d #?3, 879 {3d fir. f99S}.

A#*i*i*rnal3y, d*xpit* tlr* **r"rrt's atiexlpt gtr pravide

guidanee in irs ilrder sn Se+*ftber iL4/ **1S {doc" }:#, 158}, a

num.ber of, prtr *le fiefendants were ++nr:erfled that thefr failure to

atiend w*r:ld prejr:dice ti:sir g:ositI-a**. Ti:e q1*ar #iffere*{:€

belween tfu* S*sg-Taitz 4iJsput+ a::d the +*her De.ferrde;rls sulvpar*#

tha need E$ saver th€ cass# ss thaE pnrt.ies are n#t f*rceri t+ fly

&cro#s [he csl*ntry at the ]-aet minr.rt* t* be pra.rent f*r an issue

tha; is j.rrsls?farre ts fh*ffi. :sdee*, P1*.1"n*,iffs' bkrergency $aei{}r}

for a Te:npsrfiry Restraining *rder r:n.Ly xequesled reti*f frorn gur$

#f the tr*el"vfl rsmaining fief endants.

T* ih* *xtertf, th*t tlre=e ic * lccus i-* tki* crazy qxi3t,

*f clailrrs a:t* #r*ss claims betr+een Serg a-nd Taita, ifl Es

California where Taitz renides, Taits'* t+sbsite and c*ns,in'ring

-l1-






spsra*iilr: is *rgaitia*d, and whege 3,iberi sffls c*r:Yicted s-n* j"s

atl"egedly on probaEion.

VTI, EEEBVIOR OF fffi F;N*fIES

Buring nha ht*ring the Ci:urt re*iaded Serg and ?aitz

thet $anctl-ous mey be or**r*d urrder Rul*e 1}-' 28 U.S.C- $ l9A?'

arrd th* inherent power *f the CourE, $e,S i$,"r* {endaqt *CIrp-,,

?60 F. 3d 183, 1ee (3d cir . ?00L ) (cif ing C.hashg.s,E*g,- NASgO-*Jng' ,

scL u,s. 32. 43-,qI4 (19$1) {'The SuFreme f+urt recenely reAff irmed

bh** a disurict r+€r* ha* inherent authori*y ts impose s*ncfi{}}:'$

$Xlon ihase wha r"'+r.il* ahuse the judicial pr*eees-o]

?he fcu:rt ha* been Fatient i* deali'ng with these

eftotisnal issues but th{: ;:arties continue to $*E closer to ths

line of improper conducL. For e:{ar$P}e: f.hey csnginue Eo speak

over each other in court; object dtlring *r*:ther artor:nsy's

argn.rln*ni,; and interrapt and arg?re vritlr witn*s*es.

Addili*,nal3y, ver:/ segia*E a.ccux*t,isns lrsre if:ade *rrring

this hearing, such ss: ths hirirrg cf a hit*r*an ho kill a party,

the stealing a party's donatlon trrnde, and atbernptinE to kidnap a

chil^d cf one of the parfy's Lo the lawssir. ?he court r,tlill-

re*lnd the lasryers *}ras Lhey 'irere *,ra,rned by the Court thal n*akirrg

st:ch s*rious acclusatior:s htithaut pr$$f f,* l:ac3E them up c+uld

result in Llreir seferral to the diecipli,nary b'oard.

fhere yrere n$ hiinners aL the krearing but eurely fhere

-14-





Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Doeument 160 Filed 1212311O of 15

rlias .#ne l*ser - the s*arch ft>r tr:ith in an a:lvir+rxnerrh CIf

dec*r*xt- F*r tLis si=ruy *p$,*+de, b+th raita a::d aerg h*sr eru*]3

*f th* b}"*me.

IrIIT " CffiCTfi'SIqH

F*r the rs*.F<:r:s s*rted ab*se. bcth Flaintiffs,

Eanrgency $tr*iaa f*r a ?w6nrary A*Ferai-$ir:E *r*er a$d sefesrdar:t

f*itz'n *ral3 Ftoti*n f+r a Temp*rary Re**.ral"r:ing order siSL b+

denied. Anl appropriate order tlri}l follow.

- 15-



LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 283.1 - # 1 Exhibit 12.23.2010 Memoranum by Juge Robreno - Attachment...

Documents

Transcript of LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 283.1 - # 1 Exhibit 12.23.2010 Memoranum by Juge Robreno - Attachment...