Liberi Et Al v Taitz Et Al - Brent Liberi Declaration Doc 505
Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
-
Upload
nocompromisewtruth -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
1/20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
2/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 1
Law Offices of:PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Attorney for: PlaintiffsIdentification No. 09867(610) 825-3134
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LISA LIBERI, et al,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ORLY TAITZ, et al,
Defendants.
::::::::
::::
Assigned to Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno
Case No.: 09-cv-01898-ECR
AFFIDAVIT OF K. STREBEL.
I, K. Strebel am over the age of eighteen (18) and not a party to the within action. I have
personal knowledge of the facts herein and if called to do so, I could and would competently
testify under oath.
I declare as follows:
1. Again your honor I lead off with the quote from page 19 of the August 7th, 2009
hearing. Mr. Berg was asking your honor to rule that the Plaintiffs and their witness did not have
to disclose their full names and addresses. Your Honor ruled to protect the parties. I am quoting
from page 19 of the August 7th
, Hearing Transcript what occurred after Mr. Bergs requests.
August 7, 2009 Hearing Transcript Page 19, Lines 2-16
The Court: Well, we know who she is. How are you going to be able to denythat? She doesnt have to disclose her social security number?
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 2 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
3/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 2
Mr. Berg: No, but her actual address I think would be detrimental.
The Court: Well, the actual address we could do without it.
Mr. Berg: Okay. Could that be on other people, too, or just on Ms. Liberi?
The Court: Well, you could disclose it and file it with the Court under seal.
Mr. Berg: Thank you. With all of my witnesses today?
The Court: Yes
2. With that said, it amazes me that Defendant Taitz continues to promote that Lisa
Liberi produced a PA Drivers license when in fact Defendant Taitz was not present at the
Hearing so she would have no clue as to what was presented to Your Honor and she continues to
mention the presents of the Defendants, Ed and Caren Hale. At the time that Lisa Liberi
presented the documents that I attested to in my last Affidavit to this court, Defendant's Ed and
Caren Hale had the chance to either ask the court for verification of some sort or object to the
documents provided under seal, which they did not. The only objection in the August 7th 2009
Transcript before the discussion of providing addresses under seal came from Defendant Hale at
page 16, line 20. Where the discussion was about the disclosure of Ron Pollarik aka Ron Polland
and how his identity was made known by Defendants Belcher and Hale. Further Defendant Taitz
continues her persistent dramatization for Lisa Liberi's Drivers License impugning the integrity
of this court that witnessed these documents. I also would add that the Hale defendants acted as
Pro Se and this court allowed them a wider range of opportunity as Pro Se. Again I state at no
time did anyone state or testify to the state of issuance of Plaintiff Liberi's Drivers License.
3. I have sent to Plaintiff Liberi and received from Plaintiff Liberi packages, which I
can confirm they never came from or shipped to Texas or California.
4. Again, I state Plaintiff Lisa Liberi and her son are victims of Domestic Violence
type crimes from one John Mark Allen, father of Lisa Liberi's son. When Defendant Orly Taitz
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 3 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
4/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 3
stated that she and Neil Sankey, had received the Family Picture of Plaintiff Lisa Liberi's family
picture from a convicted Criminal one John Mark Allen, This was obtained from Defendant
Taitzs own filings with this Court and posted all over the Internet by Defendant Taitz.
John Mark Allen (1956) lives close to Taitz in South Orange County, CAConvicted of burglary of Lisa Liberis home Protective Orders for stalking Lisa Liberi
and violence against son. Lisa Liberi was placed in the safe at home project, given a
confidential address and new SSN. Defendants Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey sought outJohn Mark Allen, gave the personal information of Lisa Liberi to him, knowing Lisa
Liberi was protected from this man, as it was plead in the Complaint against the
Defendants
5. A protective order was in place when Defendant Taitz obtained this picture thus
Mr. Allen was indeed in violation of the protective order. And by him providing this picture also
makes it possible for crimes to be further committed by anyone seeking out Plaintiff Liberi or her
family. Since Neil Sankey stated that they were going to make this case go away and that Taitz
has stated she was "Going to take Philip J. Berg and his Law Firm "down" and to do so she
stated she was going to destroy Lisa Liberi and get rid of her." One would think that if you
are a previous Victim of Domestic Violence and it comes from your EX Boyfriend and he is
now supplying a family picture of Lisa Liberi and her family to Defendants Taitz and Sankey,
anyone would have concern for their life or safety of their family. Defendant Taitz aided in the
crime of violating the protective order when she first asked John Allen for the Picture and Aided
John Allen in the cyber crimes he committed when he would have had to hack into Lisa Liberi's
personal computer as this picture was never given to anyone and no one within the Liberi
household gave the picture to John Allen and the picture was only on the personal computer of
Plaintiff Liberi. If John Allen were to deny obtaining this picture from Plaintiff Liberi's personal
computer, then Defendant Taitz claim to this court that she received the picture from John Allen
is a Lie to this court. Further should John Allen claim he never gave the picture to Defendant
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 4 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
5/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 4
Taitz then she and or possibly her husband Yosef Taitz would be likely to be the one's
committing Cyber Crimes by hacking into Liberi's Personal computer. A private investigator was
hired to make contact with John Mark Allen to verify just where he obtained this photo. I have
personal knowledge of this as I assisted in locating a Private Investigator in Orange County,
California. The Private Investigator made the attempt to contact John Allen at his place of
employment, however John Allen avoided the P.I. and never came out to answer questions. Mr.
Allen did however contact Defendant Taitz about it, which was filed with this Court by the
Plaintiffs; it was Defendant Taitz who sent email to Mr. Berg for verification of this attempted
contact by the PI. In addition, Defendant Taitz harassed the Private Investigator and his staff.
John Allen is not a witness as of yet since he has not provided an affidavit or statement to this
court and has not submitted to a deposition to the facts presented by Defendant Taitz. Further
should he acknowledge giving the family photo to Defendant Taitz then he acknowledges having
violated a restraining order. We have no way of knowing if John Allen actually provided the
picture, as Defendant Taitzs has blocked and hampered with having Mr. Allen interviewed.
6. On page 4 of Defendant Taitz reply she makes the claim "however they did not
provide a scintilla of evidence to show that Taitz or anybody else did anything to threaten them
or harm them." Again a further fabrication to distort the facts. Taitz has published millions of
times from her own websites, RSS feeds etc, and further encouraged others to publish her
continued attacks on Lisa Liberi and the other Plaintiff's by publishing Lisa Liberi's Social
Security number, Mother's Maiden Name, Date and Place of Birth, address by which she
believes Liberi resides and Phone # she believes to be that of Lisa Liberi and other personal
Information. All information used to steal ones identity and also to cause people to make calls to
your home with no purpose other than to harass an individual or their family. Further Linda
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 5 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
6/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 5
Belcher published such information in her own Affidavit of the Address by which she believes
Liberi resides and the phone # she believes to be that of Liberi. Further Defendant Ed hale posted
the family picture of Lisa Liberi on his website with the caption " Do you know who this is,
someone sent this to me and I dont know who it is" he obtained the picture from Defendant
Taitz.
7. Further let us go back to my Affidavit of July 6th
, 2010 where on pages 16 & 17 I
quote Defendant Ed Hale "Yeah and I'm gonna to tell you something, when these affidavits come
in that they claim that they have. These people's names are gonna be known. Their addresses are
gonna be known. And you know something, we are gonna know who they are. And you know
what, we will go after them with a vengeance..." Words and threats are just as compelling as the
actions. If this were not so then even the Secret Service of the United States would not have to
investigate verbal threats against the President of the United States.
8. Neil Sankey has taken liberties with website publications and altering documents
supplied to Defendant Taitz, and Defendant Belcher has altered (forged) the chat log and email
in Plaintiff Liberis name, presented as evidence in this case which is a fraud upon the court.
9. After the posting of plaintiff Liberi's Social Security number by Defendant Taitz,
a Sholanda Nash began using Plaintiff Liberi's Social Security number in Harris County, Texas.
Defendant Taitz has called for someone to kidnap Plaintiff Ostellas children in retaliation for
Plaintiff Ostella bringing action against her. See Ostella's affidavit previously filed with this
court. Defendant Taitz also calls for the "Purging of Obama and his clique" and labeled the
Plaintiffs as President Obamas clique evidence of which has been filed with this court. In the
Websters Dictionary, the word purge in a political sense as used by Defendant Taitz, means to
kill.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 6 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
7/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 6
10. I also stated in my affidavit that on June 27 that Defendant Taitz posted on her
website www.orlytaitzesq.com about the death of Plaintiff Liberi's sister who died from a drug
overdose. From page 17 of my July 6th, 2009 Affidavit, "Ms. Taitz posted this article on June
27, 2009 titled I am back from PA. Very Important. This post is horrible and is regarding Lisa
Liberis sister who died of a drug overdose. Ms. Taitz infers that Lisa Liberi placed a hit or a
contract on her own sister. Ms. Taitz makes accusations in the same post that a drug overdose
may be self inflicted or inflicted by someone else. Ms. Taitz further ensues that problems with
her own car could be caused by Lisa Liberi and talks about a hit being put out by Lisa Liberi
on an Attorney, meaning herself, or her family. Ms. Taitz has again posted the names of
Detectives and DAs and contacts Phone numbers for people visiting her website to try and get
the Police involved in areas of her concocted falsified accusations. I fail to see where anything
regarding Lisa Liberis sister or her death has anything to do with Ms. Taitz or gives Ms. Taitz
any reason to post this painful and private information of Lisa Liberis sister on her website at
www.orlytaitzesq.com. Ms. Taitz simply did this to hurt and harm Lisa Liberi and her family.
This was cruel, malicious and extremely vindictive on the part of Orly Taitz.
11. Plaintiff Liberi was not able to obtain further funding in her or her husband's
name for her son's schooling because of the identity theft that occurred after Defendant Taitz
posted the vital information of Plaintiff Liberi on her website and forwarded it through other
websites and RSS feeds etc.
12. Taitz also threatened to take Philip J. Berg and his Law Firm "down" and to do so
she stated she was going to destroy Lisa Liberi and get rid of her. This most certainly
constitutes Threat and Harm. Your Honor again these threats amount to a clear violation
of State and Federal Laws pertaining to cyber-stalking, harassment, threatening of
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 7 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
8/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 7
witnesses; is interfering with witnesses and witness tampering. Cyber-stalking, harassment,
all of which are criminal offenses.
13. I still have concerns for my own safety and that of my family. I state this because
it appears that by Taitz own postings that she and the other defendants have no problem with
illegally running background reports, illegally pulling credit reports and posting anything about
anyone. Defendant Taitz shows this because she has even and still to this day continues posting
14. Defendant Taitz was ordered at the June 25th 2009 hearing to not publish
anyone's Social Security number. I have personal knowledge of this as I listened to the Courts
proceedings on C.D. and it has been filed in Court numerous times. Your Honor you also
cautioned Defendant Taitz on her publication of Plaintiff Liberi's Social security # and other
private and personal and confidential information. Your Honor stated that if the behaviors
continued it would weigh heavily in favor of the Plaintiff's and there was no permissible purpose
to post Social Security numbers. Because of the continued actions by Defendant Taitz and the
other Defendants, for the safety and protection of the Plaintiffs, the time is now Your Honor.
15. Taitz attempted to hire or pay Ruben Nieto as he attempted to receive payment
from Defendant Taitz with 3 simultaneous money requests, one in the amount of $9,000 and two
(2) in the amount of $8,000, totaling $25,000.00 on two (2) separate occasions, May 25, 2009
and May 29, 2009. Interesting the amounts being requested were each under $10,000, under the
limits of reporting pursuant to the Patriot Act. Ruben Nieto, according to Court Records, was
convicted of Aggravated Assault. It is believed Defendant Taitz was hiring Ruben Nieto to harm
Plaintiffs Liberi, Ostella and their families. It is unknown whether or not Defendant Taitz made
payment to Nieto or not. It does question why 3 separate withdrawals would be asked for within
the Social Security number of Barack Obama.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 8 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
9/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 8
4 days and under the amount of $10,000 dollars. Was it that Defendant Taitz was indeed hiring a
hitman herself and is why she has been falsely accusing Liberi of doing? Proofs of the attempted
withdrawals by Ruben Nieto are on file with this Court. Or, is it that Taitz is giving him donated
money for no apparent reason at all in the amount of $25,000 to avoid the Patriot Act tracking
and the IRS. (Again, as stated numerous times to this Court, Defendant Taitzs projects.
What ever laws Taitz is breaking or what ever scam Taitz is concocting, she blames her
victims of)
16. Defendant Taitz further implies on Page 8 & 9 of her reply "Shirley Waddell is
Liberi's mother who is clearly biased and who does not want her daughter to go back to prison.
Her affidavit appears to be very similar to multiple prior affidavits of Liberi and Strebel and
appeared to be either penned by Berg or Liberi."I have provided my own affidavits to this court
and am fully aware of what I have stated. Plaintiff Liberis mother and I have been watching all
of the events from the beginning, as have many other individuals.
17. Defendant Taitz makes the claim that I am an unemployed Truck Driver. I never
made the claim anywhere that I was unemployed. For Taitz to know that I am unemployed
would require a background check on me. I only stated that I was on Work Release and was
confined to my home. This would suggest or indicate that Defendant Taitz may again had a
background check done on me without any type of permissible purpose other than to destroy
another individual. Defendant Taitz further claims that I "witnessed nothing and have no
evidence of any act by Taitz to harm Liberi or anyone else." I have witnessed the events, and I
have supplied many pages of evidence of Defendant Taitz and the other defendants in several
affidavits presented to this court from Taitz own words and websites. I also provided evidence
where Defendant Taitz continued to deceive her supporters by not telling them that her sanctions
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 9 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
10/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 9
had been paid in the amount of $ 20.000 to the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia.
Defendant Taitz is telling her supporters how much more she needs to collect to pay her
sanctions rather than the stating the sanctions have been paid. This is a deceptive practice just as
she continues to do with this court. The evidence submitted in this case are Defendant Taitzs
own writing and from Defendant Taitz own website which she controls the posting on and often
times is the only poster on her website.
18. Defendant Taitz again fails to acknowledge that she violated the laws when she
intentionally ensured Plaintiff Liberi's I.D. would be stolen causing harm to Plaintiff Liberis
credit and her livelihood, as well as to the livelihood of Plaintiff Ostella and her family.
19. An affidavit provided by a previous lover of Defendant Taitz, Charles Edward Lincoln,
III, filed with this court provided proof that Taitz and her adulterous lover at the time, Charles
Edward Lincoln III, did drive around the area in which Plaintiff Ostella resides and where
Plaintiff Ostellas children attend school, and in the course of that drive stopped at several police
stations in an effort to have Plaintiff Ostella arrested on false charges that Taitz concocted.
20. Further at no time did I or anyone else state, mention or disclose where Plaintiff
Liberis license was issued from or where Plaintiff Liberi resides, as Defendant Taitz continues
falsely asserting.
21. On page 9 of Taitzs September 28, 2010 filing, Taitz further goes on to say
"Taitz and John Allen have colluded to further bring harm to Lisa Liberi. Again he provided zero
evidence to substantiate such allegation." Again I have the statement of Defendant Taitz
herself, that she filed with this court, claiming she and Defendant Neil Sankey went to John
Allen and received the family photo of Plaintiff Liberi from John Allen and that John Allen
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 10 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
11/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 10
verified the photo to be that of Lisa Liberi and her family. At the time Taitz claims to have
received this photo, Plaintiff Liberi was under a protective order.
22. Let us review the statements made on page 10 of Defendant Taitz reply. Taitzs
states that I am an unemployed truck driver and have no legal training. To the contrary, I grew
up around Law Enforcement, have friends and relatives on several police forces, have a friend
who is a Paralegal with the State Attorney General's office and am able to research online several
of the laws that have been broken by the Defendants in this case. Has Defendant Taitz heard of
Taft, Findlaw or Cornell University who have the Laws (Law Library) on line? Has Defendant
Taitz ever used a Dictionary online? Dictionary.com is wonderful and is used for legal
definitions. Defendant Taitz or whomever "penned" her reply should read my affidavit again as
I clearly have shown where she is in violation of the law.
23. The statement made by Taitz "He attached some 100 pages of copies of Taitz web
site and claims that the fact that Taitz published pleadings of this case constitutes an obstruction
of justice, harassment and stalking. This is an insane argument."On the contrary, what is insane
is that Taitz in her Reply twisted the actual facts and what I said as well as the facts pertaining to
this case. What I stated in my 09/14/2010 Affidavit on page 6 Paragraph 10 is:
"In addition, as Im sure this Court may have noticed, the past few filings in this Court by
Defendant Orly Taitz that are filled with untruthful and false allegations, Defendant Taitz has
sent to Judge David O. Carter, and Chief Judge Audrey B. Collins of the U.S. District Court,
Central District of California, Southern Division for absolutely no permissible purpose, other
than to prejudice the Judges and/or to force the Judges in this District to recues themselves, as
this is the Court Your Honor Ordered transfer of the within matter to. This is documented on the
Certificate of Service on the filings made by Defendant Taitz. Defendant Taitzs actions interfere
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 11 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
12/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 11
with the proper administration of justice and therefore, constitutes criminal Obstruction of
Justice. The definition of Obstruction of Justice is the crime or act of willfully interfering
with the process of justice and law esp. by influencing, threatening, harming, or impeding a
witness, potential witness, juror, orjudicial or legal officer or by furnishing false information
in or otherwise impeding an investigation or legal process [emphasis added]
24. See Defendant Orly Taitzs Certificate of Service page, page 20 on file from her
reply, Orly Taitz again sends copies of her Reply to Motion filed September 28, 2010 to
Audrey B. Collins Chief Judge, US District Court, Central District of CA, Southern
Division and Judge David O. Carter, USDC Central District of CA, Southern Division.
These 2 Judges are located in the Court, Your Honor has transferred this case to. As I
previously stated, it is my understanding that cases are assigned in the Central District of CA,
Southern Division where this case is being transferred too, on a alpha split, with Judge Carter
assigned last name initials of J, K, L and at the current time this case has not been transferred
as of this date, however, will be transferred. Therefore Defendant Taitzs communications of
pleadings to the U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division or anyone
associated with the Central District of CA, Southern Division court, where Taitz does not have
any pending cases, and is only sending her falsified and fabricated stories in her pleadings to
prejudice the Judges and court against the Plaintiffs, is an obstruction of justice in an attempt
to interfere with the justice process. See 18 U.S.C 1505.
25. On the subject of Harassment, the definition of harassment is 1). to disturb
persistently; torment, as with troubles or cares; bother continually; pester; persecute. 2). to
trouble by repeated attacks, incursions, etc., as in war or hostilities; harry; raid. Posting of
Plaintiff Liberi's personal information including her Social Security number, family picture, and
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 12 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
13/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 12
a purported address and phone number with false statements and attacks over and over again
constitutes harassment and cyber-stalking. Driving around the neighborhood of Lisa Ostella and
seeking out Police officers to go make a false arrest constitutes harassment. Asking for someone
to kidnap the children of Plaintiff Ostella is harassment. Asking her supporters to dig up
information on Plaintiff Liberi and her husband, is harassment and cyber-stalking. Asking for
help from supporters in the areas where she believes Plaintiffs Liberi and Ostella reside
constitutes harassment and cyber-stalking. Continually accusing one of stealing funds from a
foundation without a single bit of truth over and over again is harassment and cyber-stalking.
Posting the family picture obtained illegally and Social Security Number over and over and
publishing it in Court pleadings not having anything to do with this case and in violation of the
ECF rules is harassment and cyber-stalking. Using the courts to further publicize this illegal
activity is harassment and cyber-stalking. Going on radio stations and making accusations is
harassment and cyber-stalking.
26. Taitzs newest filing on September 28, 2010 contains information supplied
supposedly by Geoff Staples is stolen material as he is the Owner of the company by which
this information was supplied without a subpoena, court order or notification to Mr. Berg. Geoff
Staples provided altered, forged and stolen documents to Defendant Taitz. These documents
have been faxed at least two (2) separate times, One (1) from Geoff Staples to Defendant Taitz
and (1) from Defendant Taitz to some unknown location. Use of a phone line across State lines
in connection with distributing altered, forged, and stolen information is a crime and considered
Wire Fraud. Use of the Internet to further send out forged, altered and stolen documents is a
Cyber Crime.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 13 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
14/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 13
27. I have been for approximately 1-1/2 years and continue to be a Web
Administrator for Mr. Bergs website. Plaintiff Liberi has never handled any credit cards, and
she never had access to the donation accounts or servers which Mr. Bergs website and blog
were hosted.
28. Stalking, again, as explained in my previous Affidavit, is the act or crime of
willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause
a reasonable person to fear injury or death esp. because of express or implied threats; broadly a
crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose
and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
1
And, the crime ofcyber-stalking is
using tactics that harass and threaten their victims, such as posting the victims name and
address on the Internet along with false claims.2.
29. Defendant Taitz threatened Plaintiffs Liberi, Osetlla and Berg. Defendant Taitz
has continually published Plaintiff Liberis Social Security number, date of birth, place of birth,
mothers maiden name, many false accusations, the address which Defendant Taitz believes is
Plaintiff Liberi's and Phone # she believes to be that of Plaintiff Liberi and now Plaintiff Liberis
family picture which Taitz illegally obtained. In these circumstances that would cause a
reasonable person to fear injury or death esp. because of express or implied threats; which is
broadly a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate
purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person. False allegations about
1 http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/stalking (Legal Dictionary)
2 Wayne Petherick, Cyber-Stalking: Obsessional Pursuit and the Digital Criminal, The Crime Library, (cyber-
stalking is an extension of real world stalking in which electronic mediums such as the Internet are used to
pursue, harass or contact another in an unsolicited fashion). See i-safe America, Cyber Stalking.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 14 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
15/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 14
Plaintiff Liberi, Ostella and Berg are continually filed with this Court and placed all over the
Internet by Defendant Taitz and the other Defendants.
30. Plaintiffs Liberi and Ostella are continually harassed, they receive death threats,
strange people have shown up at their homes, they live in fear daily.
31. Defendant Linda Belchers last Affidavit supplied to this court as Exhibit 3 in
Defendant Taitz filing is not to be considered as fact. The Notary in this document Cindy
Tschukart has signed this document without any Official Seal from the State of Texas where
Defendant Belcher lives. Further there is no expiration of the Notary's commission and no listing
from which County or State of where this document was supposedly notarized. There is no
way to verify this Notary to ensure her stamp was not stolen or forged. Therefore it this is not an
official Notary for the State of Texas and Defendant Taitz as a licensed Attorney had a fiduciary
duty to make sure this Affidavit complied with the laws when filing the document as genuine.
32. It is no secret that Defendant Taitz has submitted copies of forged Birth
Authentic, yet they have been found to be forgeries. It is also no secret that Defendant Taitzs
own witness in another case, even stated that Taitz husband, Yosef Taitz, may have created the
forged Birth Certificate filed by Taitz in Judge David O. Carters court
33. Letter from Geoff Staples Exhibit # 2 in Defendant Taitz Reply is nothing more
than a fraud upon this court. First of all there is no Affidavit attached to the supplied information
by Geoff Staples. The information by him is obtained or produced illegally, as he was the former
WebMaster and Host for the Obamacrimes.com Website. In his position he had access to all
factors as it relates to the Website. Mr. Staples was under a legal obligation at the time he was
fired from his position to turn over any and all documentation or remove it in its entirety from his
Certificates of several kinds and illustration claiming them to be that of Barack Obama and being
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 15 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
16/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 15
own systems and servers all information pertaining to Mr. Bergs supporters, and to turn over
any and all access passwords to the owner of the website, which is Mr. Berg.
34. As a web Administrator, I am obligated, should I leave a site, to not continue
using my access or to lock others out of the access to the website or donation areas or to server
access so that the next person to take my place can access the site properly and not have to worry
about my further intrusion.
35. It would appear that not only are these documents forged, they are a perpetrated
fraud upon the court, but also that it could be that Geoff Staples still had Administrative access to
pull whatever information he needed to send to Defendant Taitz. The information supplied to
Defendant Taitz in these pages brings harm to two individuals not related to this case but now
may find themselves injeopardy of identity theft. Defendant Taitz with the aid of Geoff Staples
and likely Defendant Belcher as she was the person who first introduced Geoff Staples to
Plaintiff Berg has now breached Mr. Bergs supporters private information and credit data. It is
my understanding that Plaintiff Berg is notifying the parties whose information was breached by
Geoff Staples, Linda Belcher and Orly Taitz of the illegal distribution of their personal
information.
36. Your Honor, Geoff Staples used his position as a Webmaster and a Hosting
Company through his business, Hostricity to steal private data of Mr. Bergs supporters who
have donated to Mr. Berg. Defendant Taitz then intentionally posted the information of Mr.
Bergs supporters who made donations to further harm Mr. Bergs law practice. As a Web
Administrator this is very concerning to me because it is unknown how many other supporters of
Mr. Bergs, who made donations, private information and credit data was turned over to
Defendant Taitz by Geoff Staples.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 16 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
17/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 16
37. Another problem I have come across with the filing of Defendant Taitzs and the
documents supplied by Geoff Staples is the fact, the documents have been altered and forged,
illegally inputting Plaintiff Liberis email address, to depict that Plaintiff Liberi sent the email.
With Defendant Taitzs past history of filing forged documents in this Case as well as other
Courts and Defendant Taitz seeking of perjured testimony, this is no surprise to me to see that
Plaintiff Liberis email address has again been forged.
38. It has been filed with and shown to this court, Defendant Belchers forged Plaintiff
Liberis email address, [email protected], on a chat log and emails; Defendants Taitz and
Sankey alterations of Website information and blog articles; Defendants Sankey and Taitz
altered/forged Plaintiff Ostellas emails and email address; and now we have documents with
Plaintiff Liberis email address forged on documents from Geoff Staples that Defendant Taitz
has filed with Your Honors Court, as accurate..
39. The problems with these attachments from Taitzs September 28, 2010 filing is
that Geoff Staples or Defendant Taitz shows Plaintiff Liberi's Email as coming from the email
address of [email protected], however when I go back and look at every email that came to me
from Plaintiff Liberi's AOL account it comes in as [email protected]. Geoff Staples email
shows it coming in as [email protected]. The email has been altered and Plaintiff Liberi's
email address has been illegally inputted. Plaintiff Liberis email address on all the emails she
has ever sent me comes in as two (2) lowercase (ll's) while Geoff Staples shows her email
coming in with a Capital (L) followed by a lower case (l). When you sign up for AOL or any
other email address, it presets the appearance of your email. And, Plaintiff Liberis email is
preset as [email protected] not [email protected].
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 17 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
18/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 17
40. Further the Date time stamp on Geoff Staples pages filed by Taitz, shows the Day
of the week first, the Date, Month and Year, which reflects Military Date/Time not Standard
Date/Time. Now all of the emails I have ever received from Plaintiff Liberis AOL email
address, which is tons, come into me with the day of the week, the month, the date, and year in
standard time, e.g. Mon, the Month, date, the Year, the time and either am or pm, e.g. Mon,
Oct 4, 2010 3:19 pm, which is Standard time and no indication of EST ( Eastern Standard Time)
MST ( Mountain Standard Time) etc, just am or pm. Not Military Time. This indicates the
email information has been altered and changed and Plaintiff Liberis email address was illegally
added and could not have come from Plaintiff Liberi.
41. Whenever any person sends an email, there is header information which shows
where the email was sent from, the date, time, and subject, the path through the email service;
who the email was sent to and the path through the receivers email service. There is header
information on the pages purported to be from Plaintiff Liberi, filed by Defendant Taitz. These
are clear forgeries. The emails did not come from [email protected], Plaintiff Liberis AOL
email address. Instead, Taitz or Geoff Staples illegally inputted (altered/forged) Plaintiff Liberis
email to deceive people and this Court into thinking that Plaintiff Liberi sent the email. The
header information with each email does not show Plaintiff Liberis email address as it would
had Plaintiff Liberi really sent the email from her email address, [email protected]. Instead, it
shows Geoff Staples email address as sending the email to other email addresses, Plaintiff
Liberis email address appears no where in the header information supplied and filed by Taitz
and Geoff Staples.
42. The fourteen pages filed by Defendant Taitz are forged and altered and therefore
cannot be authenticated.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 18 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
19/20
Affidavit of K. Strebel 10/5/2010 18
43. Your Honor this further outlines why the TRO should be in place. Not only to
stop the Defendants from forging documents with the Plaintiffs names and email address, but
Parties now outside of this lawsuit are now being hurt without their knowledge and it is now
taking time to notify Law Enforcement of these crimes recently committed by Geoff Staples and
Defendant Taitz. It further breaches what would be confidentiality between the Donors to
Obamacrimes.com and Mr. Berg as they have a right to privacy and their Constitutional rights
are now being violated By Defendant Taitz and Geoff Staples. Should this court choose not to
issue a restraining order against the defendants then it should be aware that Defendant Taitz will
continue her illegal acts, which are causing severe damages.
44. In addition to the above-mentioned crimes, Defendant Taitz is also guilty of
additional Crimes as it relates to Geoff Staples. Taitz is now in receipt of stolen property by her
own admission by filing stolen and forged information with this court. These continued crimes
of Taitzs must be reported to the State Bar of California and turned over to the U.S. Marshals or
U.S. Attorney for immediate investigation and prosecution.
45. For the reasons explained herein, I pray this court will deny Defendant Taitzs
Motion to obtain Plaintiff Lisa Liberis drivers license, to protect Plaintiff Liberi and further
issue a Restraining order upon the Defendants and Geoff Staples to stop the crimes of forgery,
cyber-stalking, obstruction of justice, harassment, violation of a restraining order and aiding in
cyber crimes and violation of a restraining order and other crimes the defendants and their
supporters on their behalf, are committing against the Plaintiffs. Further I pray this Honorable
court will forward this information to the California Bar Association for immediate action
against Taitz and to the U.S. Marshals and/or U.S. Attorney for immediate investigation and
prosecution..
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 19 of 20
-
8/8/2019 Liberi v Taitz Affidavit of K Strebel Exhibit 3
20/20
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 146-5 Filed 10/07/10 Page 20 of 20