Lexical cohesive analysis

18
Lexical Cohesive Analysis Agus Purnomo Uspan Sayuti Vetty Kurnely

Transcript of Lexical cohesive analysis

Page 1: Lexical cohesive analysis

Lexical Cohesive Analysis

Agus PurnomoUspan SayutiVetty Kurnely

Page 2: Lexical cohesive analysis

BACKGROUND

•Discourse organization

•Coherence, cohesion, genre

•Cohesion: grammatical and lexical cohesion

Page 3: Lexical cohesive analysis

LEXICAL COHESION• Lexical Cohesion is a linguistic device which

helps to create unity of text and discourse.

• Lexical cohesion deals with the meaning in text. “This is the cohesive effect achieved by the selection of vocabulary” (Halliday and Hasan, 1976).

Page 4: Lexical cohesive analysis

• The mango is sweet. The ‘mana lagi’ is sour too. The mango is …

Page 5: Lexical cohesive analysis

CATEGORIES OF LC (

Reiteration is a form of lexical cohesion which involves the repetition of lexical item, at one end of the scale.

A. Repetition

Repetition, or sometimes called reiteration, is the most direct and obvious source of lexical cohesion since it is the mere identical recurrence of a preceding lexical item.

Page 6: Lexical cohesive analysis

CATEGORIES OF LCA. Repetition

Example:

1. Algy met a bear. The bear was bulgy.

2. Budi kick the ball. The ball is circle

3. Trying ……

Page 7: Lexical cohesive analysis

CATEGORIES OF LCB. Synonym

According to the Oxford advance learning  Dictionary, synonymy refers to “the fact of two

or more words or expressions having the same meaning.”

Page 8: Lexical cohesive analysis

CATEGORIES OF LCExample:

I heard a sound, but I couldn’t figure out where that noise came from.

Noise refers back to sound. Both terms have the same level of generality and are therefore synonyms in the narrower sense.

Page 9: Lexical cohesive analysis

CATEGORIES OF LCAnother example:

Seven blackbirds began to sing in the morning. These birds were singing beautifully.

Birds refers back to blackbirds but has a higher level of generality and is therefore a superordinate term.

Page 10: Lexical cohesive analysis

CATEGORIES OF LCC. Hyponymy

Describes a “specific-general” relationship between lexical items.

Example:

A: Then they began to meet vegetation

B: prickly cactus-like plants and coarse grass.

Plants and grass are specific parts of vegetation and therefore altogether form a cohesive relationship.

Page 11: Lexical cohesive analysis

1. A way of achieving cohesion by way of repeating the same word or phrase or using chains of related words that contribute towards the continuity of lexical meaning: ‘Each day she had gone with Tom and Peter or just with Tom down into the Underground and played her violin’ (BNC, EDN).

1. ‘Each day she had gone with Tom and Peter or just with Tom down into the Underground and played her violin’ (BNC, EDN).

2. In the above example, Tom is repeated a second time, in order to make it clear who is being referred to.

1. In the above example, Tom is repeated a second time, in order to make it clear who is being referred to.

2. A pronoun like him would have been ambiguous.

Page 12: Lexical cohesive analysis

1. I hate someone who is sitting in front of me.

2. Because she always disturbs me.

Page 13: Lexical cohesive analysis

CATEGORIES OF LCD. Metonymy

Describes a “part-whole” relationship between lexical items.

Example: She knelt down and looked along the passage into the

loveliest garden you ever saw. How she longed to wander about

among those beds of bright flowers and those cool fountains.

• Flowers and Fountains are typical parts of a garden and therefore altogether form a cohesive relationship.

Page 14: Lexical cohesive analysis

CATEGORIES OF LCE. Antonymy

• Describes a relationship between lexical items that have opposite meanings.

Example: He fell asleep. What woke him was a loud crash.

Asleep and woke are antonyms and therefore form a cohesive relationship.

Page 15: Lexical cohesive analysis

CATEGORIES OF LCF. Collocation

Definition is a natural combination of words; it refers to the way English words are closely associated with each other. This collocation divides into two types:

Page 16: Lexical cohesive analysis

CATEGORIES OF LC Systemic semantic relation

(systematically classifiable).

Example: – Mary likes green apple.– She does not like red ones.

Page 17: Lexical cohesive analysis

CATEGORIES OF LC Nonsystematic semantic relation (not

systematically classifiable).

Example: – Mary spent three hours in the garden yesterday.– She was dinging potatoes.

Page 18: Lexical cohesive analysis