GROUP 4

LESSON PLAN CRITIC

INTRODUCTIONRATING:

SATISFACTORY

COMMENT:

The introduction stated the grade level, topic, content area and the rationale statement but the teacher should emphasize if the lesson plan is semi-detailed or detailed.

BEHAVIORAL OBJECTIVES

RATING:

BELOW STANDARD

COMMENT:

The teacher have vague instructional goal and behavioral objectives. The teacher’s affective domain is not specific.

ANTICIPATORY SET

RATING:

BELOW STANDARD

COMMENT:

It did not connect to the students’ prior knowledge since their review is about area of a triangle and their new topic is the volume of rectangular prism.

TEACHER INPUTRATING:

SATISFACTORY

COMMENT:

The input provide basic information needed for the students to gain knowledge or skill.

MODELING THE BEHAVIOR

RATING:

SATISFACTORY

COMMENT:

The teacher uses the material presented (the prism) to show students example of what is expected as an end product of their work.

CHECK FOR COMPREHENSION

RATING:

SATISFACTORY

COMMENT:

The checking for comprehension is stated with one example of a problem and how to solve the given problem.

GUIDED PRACTICE

RATING:

SATISFACTORY

COMMENT:

There is only one group activity that gives opportunity to each learners to practice their learning with the guidance of the teacher.

CLOSURERATING:

EXCELLENT

COMMENT:

There is a clear, concrete and comprehensive conclusion to the lesson.

INDEPENDENT PRACTICE

RATING:

SATISFACTORY

COMMENT:

There is only one activity that linked to the lesson and practice by the learners without the guidance of the teacher. The teachers instruction is not clear.

ASSESSMENTRATING:

BELOW STANDARD

COMMENT:

There is an assessment but it has a little relevance to the target objectives. So the teacher and the student cannot identify if they achieved the stated objectives.

MEMBERS:PRETZEL ANN REDROBBY MARGAJAHAZEL VILBARREBA TANEO

IRENE LABIAGA