Fortinet, Inc. v. FireEye, Inc., Civ. No. 12-1066-SLR (D. Del. May 16, 2013).
Leo Pharma A/S v. Tolmar, Inc., Civ. No. 10-269-SLR (D. Del. Apr. 25, 2012).
-
Upload
alfred-reyes -
Category
Documents
-
view
497 -
download
0
Transcript of Leo Pharma A/S v. Tolmar, Inc., Civ. No. 10-269-SLR (D. Del. Apr. 25, 2012).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
LEO PHARMA A/S,
Plaintiff,
v.
TOLMAR, INC.,
Defendant.
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
) ) ) ) ) Civ. No. 10-269-SLR ) ) ) )
ORDER
At Wilmington this 25th day of April, 2012, having conferred with counsel;
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's request that trial on the '013 patent be stayed
pending the outcome of the appeal on reexamination to the Board of Patent Appeals
and Interferences ("the Board"), a request opposed by defendant, is denied. Although it
is impossible to predict with certainty what the Board will decide on appeal, if the '0 13
patent is determined to be invalid, plaintiff has represented that it will appeal that
decision to the Federal Circuit, as will any decision by this court be appealed. Likewise,
if the '013 patent were to survive reexamination in some form, defendant will continue
to challenge validity in this litigation. Because this is a bench trial, the evidence and
arguments presented by the parties can be supplemented if need be. Since neither
party is willing to abide by the decision of any forum other than the Federal Circuit, this
Case 1:10-cv-00269-SLR Document 191 Filed 04/25/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2723
court will do what it is supposed to do, try the case.
2
Case 1:10-cv-00269-SLR Document 191 Filed 04/25/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2724