Leks
-
Upload
ingrid-small -
Category
Documents
-
view
29 -
download
8
description
Transcript of Leks
Leks
• Hotspot
• Female preference– Male aggregations– Hotshots
• Kin selection
• The lek paradox
• Swedish for mating arena
• No male parental care
• No resource on territory
• Males aggregate and display at traditional sites
Leks
Leks ->
antelope
Leks occur when females are not defensible
grouse & ptarmigan
Males defend tiny territories on a lek
Bat video
Male mating success on leks
Sage grouse video
Lekking and frugivory in birds
Lek
Exploded lek
Territory
New World lekking birds
Manakins Bell birds
Cock-of-the-rock
QuickTime™ and aH.263 decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Hypotheses for male clustering
• Hotspot– males aggregate to maximize female encounter rate
• Female preference– Females prefer to select mates in aggregations
– Females prefer central male
– Females prefer attractive male (hotshot) and other males aggregate around him
• Kin selection– Males aggregate around relatives
The hotspot model
Leks of leks suggest hotspots
Hermit hummingbirdOchre-bellied flycatcherRed-capped manakinBlue-crowned manakin
Sage grouse leks and hotspots
Lek locationFemale nest density
Possible reasons for female preference to mate at a lek
• Reduce predation– No evidence in sage grouse
• More efficient comparison of males– Reduce mate searching costs
– But, assuming male quality is normally distributed, advantage of choosing best male is greatest in small, not large, leks
– Can copy choice of othersNumber of males
Std
dev
uni
ts
Best-of-n expectation
Mate choice copying in sage grouse
Green = observed, orange = predicted w/out copying
Mate choice copying simulations
Do leks recruit more females/male in kob?
No!
Do leks recruit more females/male in ruff?
Sometimes!
Are black grouse hotshots?
Yearly shift suggests male attractiveness, not position, is important
Related manakins on leks
Shorey et al. 2000 Nature 408:352-353
Also in peacock, black grouse, satinbowerbirds, wild turkeys
The lek paradox
• In lekking species, males only pass sperm. Therefore, only indirect benefits are possible.
• If males differ in genetic quality, then females should always prefer the male of highest quality.
• Over time, such intense selection will deplete and possibly eliminate genetic variation.
• What then do females gain by choosing?
Solution to the lek paradox
• Genetic variation must persist for ornamental traits and genetic quality
• Ornament expression depends on condition.– Only males in good condition are able to fully
express ornament– Condition is likely influenced by many genes.
Consequently, deleterious mutations constantly replenish genetic variation.
Sage grouse condition and display