Leigh Creek Energy Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) Demonstration Plant...
Transcript of Leigh Creek Energy Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) Demonstration Plant...
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Michael Malavazos
Director Engineering Operations
Energy Resources Division
Leigh Creek EnergyUnderground Coal Gasification (UCG)
Demonstration Plant Project
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Outline of Presentation
1. Introduction
2. Leigh Creek Energy (LCK) UCG Proposal location and aim
3. What is UCG?
4. South Australian Regulatory Process
5. Challenges for Favourable UCG project
6. How does this proposal compare to these challenges?
7. Next steps
Confidentiality-I#-A#
What is this project? Read All About It:
http://www.petroleum.statedevelopment.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/309360/20171220_-_Report_-_Leigh_Creek_Energy_PEL650_EIR_Rev3.PDF
• Leigh Creek Energy propose to construct and operate a small-scale Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) demonstration plant in the Leigh Creek coalfield (ex-mine site) in Northern South Australia.
• Site is located approximately 8.5 km from the nearest town Copley and 12km from Leigh Creek township
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Location: Leigh Creek South Australia
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Confidentiality-I#-A#
UCG Demonstration Plant Project
• This facility will involve the construction of an above ground plant (and associated infrastructure) and the establishment of a single below ground UCG gasifier chamber.
• The gasifier chamber will be 500 m at depth and approximately 30m long and 15m high at the conclusion of operations
• The demonstration plant is intended to be operated for a short period of time (approximately 2-3 months) to ascertain the technical and environmental performance of the process.
• As this is an exploration activity, the syngas produced is required to be thermally destroyed on site in a thermal oxidiser.
3
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Confidentiality-I#-A#
What is UCG?
Confidentiality-I#-A#
In basic terms:
Source: Camp and White, 2015: http://www.petroleum.statedevelopment.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/299679/llnl-ucg-groundwater-report-2015a.pdf
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Gasification Reactions:
Source: Camp and White, 2015: http://www.petroleum.statedevelopment.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/299679/llnl-ucg-groundwater-report-2015a.pdf
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Gasification Reactions:
Pyrolysis:When the dry coal reaches 200–500◦ C, volatiles are released and the coal turns to char:
Coal → Char + Ash + Hydrocarbons + CH4 + H2 + H2O + CO + CO2
Gaseous species migrate towards open cavity, where they participate in other reactions.
Oxidation/Gasification:Carbon-containing compounds in the char (C) react with injected oxygen:
C + O2 → CO2
2C + O2 → 2CO
C + H2O → H2 + CO (Valuable component of Syngas)
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Gasification Chamber
Source: LLNL Presentation November 2013, Brisbane
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Typical Syngas Compositions
Confidentiality-I#-A#
South Australian Regulatory FrameworkIn South Australia
Petroleum Exploration and Production Activities regulated under:
• Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Act 2000 (PGE Act);
• Environment Protection Act 1993;
• Natural Resources Management Act 2004;
• National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972;
• Aboriginal Heritage Act, 1988;
• Development Act, 1993;
• Work Health and Safety Act 2012;
• Public and Environmental Health (Waste Control) Regulations 2010;
• Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999;
• Commonwealth Native Title Act 1994
Interaction between PGE Act and other South Australian Acts administered through Administrative Arrangements with respective agencies
Confidentiality-I#-A#
DEFINITION OF ENVIRONMENT
Includes:
• Land, air, water, soil
• Plants & animals
• Social, cultural and heritage features
• Visual amenity
• Economic and other land uses
15
Confidentiality-I#-A#
LICENSING AND APPROVALS PROCESS FOR EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES• Stage 1 – Licensing
• Stage 2 – Environmental Assessment and approval of Environmental Objectives
• Stage 3 – Activity Notification and Approval
Confidentiality-I#-A#
STAGE 2 – ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES
Environmental Impact Report (EIR)• Needs to consider all risks to the environment (definition provided previously) and
how these risks will be managed to sufficiently enable an informed decision to be made on the likely impact the activities will have on the environment.
Statement of Environmental Objectives (SEO)• Be prepared on the basis of the EIR and include:
• Environmental objectives to be achieved
• Guide on how objectives will be achieved
• Assessment criteria to measure objectives
Confidentiality-I#-A#
EIR AND SEO
• Developed in consultation with relevant stakeholders – e.g. landholders/ native title claimants and government agencies (DEWNR/AARD/EPA/ DPTI/ DOH/ SWSA)
• If approved the documents will be published on DPC website
• Reviewed every 5 years or as required by Minister
Confidentiality-I#-A#
SEO Approval Process
EIR & Draft SEO
APPROVAL
Environmental Significance Assessment
Statement of Environmental
Objectives
MEDIUM IMPACTPublic Consultation
LOW IMPACTInternal Govt Consultation
HIGH IMPACTEIS Process
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Regulatory Assessment Summary
• Leigh Creek Energy (LCK) submitted first draft of Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to DPC in late September 2017
• DPC consulted with its US independent expert on 28th September
• DPC identified need for additional information
• DPC visited Queensland EPA to review evidence related to Linc Energy allegations
• LCK drilled 3 additional wells for geotechnical data to supplement EIR
• Final EIR and draft SEO resubmitted in December 2018
• EIR and SEO released for stakeholder consultation and closed 28th
February 2018
• Submissions being reviewed and addressed by LCK/government
• DPC decision expected by early 2nd Quarter 2018
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Knowledge to date
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Independent Advice sort:
• David Camp, former UCG program leader at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, chemical engineer with experience in fossil fuel and underground technologies
• Josh White, geotechnical modelling researcher at LLNL, geomechanics/geotechnical engineer with experience in fossil-fuel-related technologies.
1
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Publicationshttp://www.petroleum.statedevelopment.sa.gov.au/projects/prj_leigh_creek_energy_isg
Confidentiality-I#-A# 10
Hazard Screening Checklist: http://www.petroleum.statedevelopment.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/299679/llnl-ucg-groundwater-report-2015a.pdf
Confidentiality-I#-A# 11
Hazard Screening Checklist: http://www.petroleum.statedevelopment.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/299679/llnl-ucg-groundwater-report-2015a.pdf
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Hazard Screening Checklist: http://www.petroleum.statedevelopment.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/299679/llnl-ucg-groundwater-report-2015a.pdf
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Confidentiality-I#-A# 9
?
?
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Key Identified Risks• Loss of containment due to loss of well integrity
• Migration of chemicals of potential concern away from gasifier
• Gasifier pressure exceeding surrounding groundwater pressure
• Direct escape from the gasifier through drill holes or transmissive faults
• Gasifier chamber growth intersecting potential migration pathway
• Increase in permeability of surrounding by mechanical stress changes and fracturing (including significant gasifier chamber collapse)
• Migration of COPC from gasifier chamber after decommissioning
6
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Key Identified Risks• Loss of containment due to loss of well integrity
• Migration of chemicals of potential concern away from gasifier
• Gasifier pressure exceeding surrounding groundwater pressure
• Direct escape from the gasifier through drill holes or transmissive faults
• Gasifier chamber growth intersecting potential migration pathway
• Increase in permeability of surrounding by mechanical stress changes and fracturing (including significant gasifier chamber collapse)
• Migration of COPC from gasifier chamber after decommissioning
• Risk mitigation focus: COPC loss of containment into atmosphere • Low/insignificant risk to any aquifers
6
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Ideal Chamber Behaviour
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Reality
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Possible paths for gas and contaminant transport
Source: LLNL Presentation November 2013, Brisbane
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Stress changes can induce fractures and permeability
Source: LLNL Presentation November 2013, Brisbane
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Source: LLNL Presentation November 2013, Brisbane
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Geology and Hydrology
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Geology and Hydrology: Telford Basin Cross Section (North – South)
Area of interest for understanding
groundwater risks
4
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Geology and Hydrology: Registered water bores
Confidentiality-I#-A# 5
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Plateau between Upper and Main Series Coal Pits
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Additional Geotechnical Data
Confidentiality-I#-A# 43
Playford 2, 2A and 2B
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Playford 2, 2A and 2B
Confidentiality-I#-A# 45
Playford 2, 2A and 2B
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Independent Geo-mechanical Assessment
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Ikon Science Report Review Status:
• Ikon main conclusion:Rock strength for both the mudstone that overlies the proposed pilot UCG chamber and any pre-existing faults within the mudstone are highly unlikely to be affected by planned and controllable operating conditions within LCK’s proposed pilot UCG chamber.
• DPC-ERD continue to review this report along with other new data acquired from Playford 2, 2A and 2B drilling and Alinta archives.
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Rock and Fault Strength Analysis
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Proof of all this will be in the performance!
So how do we demonstrate that we have containment?
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Source: LLNL Presentation November 2013, Brisbane
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Source: LLNL Presentation November 2013, Brisbane
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Monitoring Plans: Essential Part of Stage 3 Approval
Tarp: Trigger Action Response Plans
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Proposed Monitoring
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Next Steps
• Public submissions on EIR and draft SEO closed on 28 February
• DPC-ERD forwarded submissions and its own comments to LCK
• DPC-ERD review and collectively respond to all submissions
• LCK to submit its responses and revised EIR/SEO if necessary
• DPC-ERD will assess and decide on approval or otherwise of SEO
• If substantial changes made, revised EIR and SEO re-consulted on
• If decision is made to approve SEO it will be gazetted
• LCK will then proceed to Stage 3 of approval process
Confidentiality-I#-A#
STAGE 3 – ACTIVITY NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL
Activity Notification includes:• Detailed technical activity information
• Fitness for purpose details of: wells, surface facilities, monitoring plans etc.• Risk assessment documentation
• Landholder information (Notice of Entry)
• Work Area Clearance
• Any other material required by DPC to ensure it has comprehensive information on the proposed activities.
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Stage 3 Approval: Gasifier Hazard Analysis
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Stage 3 Approval: Surface facility Hazard Analysis
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Questions
Confidentiality-I#-A#
For more information contact:Michael Malavazos, Director Engineering Operations:Mob: 0401 121 666; [email protected]
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Additional Slides
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Well Construction Practices
Confidentiality-I#-A#
Telford Basin – Geology and GAB Boundary
Confidentiality-I#-A#