Legal Writing - Part 2 -Legal Opinion

download Legal Writing - Part 2 -Legal Opinion

of 2

Transcript of Legal Writing - Part 2 -Legal Opinion

  • 8/11/2019 Legal Writing - Part 2 -Legal Opinion

    1/2

    JUDY ANN SANCHEZ

    911 Bluewhale Street

    Palanan, Makati City

    Dear Ms. Sanchez:

    This refers to your request for our advice with regard to the

    possibility of bringing a lawsuit against McBee Foods Corporation as a result

    of the injuries you have sustained after you fell from the staircase of

    McBee-Metropark Branch.

    According to the facts which you and your daughter have relayed tous, on your way up to the second floor of McBee-Metropark Branch, you

    were hit by the McBee Mascot who was hurrying down with another crew

    member. As a result of which, you lost your balance and fall from the

    staircase which caused you extreme back pains. Immediately, the store

    manager and crew members brought you to the nearest hospital for

    treatment. That when you asked the management of McBee-Metropark

    Branch for payment of damages, the latter responded through a formal

    letter of apology and agreed to shoulder the hospital bills as well as all the

    expenses related to your physical therapy until such time that you are fullyrestored to your previous health. Since the accident, you are undergoing a

    weekly physical therapy which caused you not only great inconvenience but

    also physical pains.

    Based on the foregoing, the issue here is very clear, to wit: whether

    or not McBee Foods Corporation is liable for damages on account of the

    negligence of their employees.

    We answer in the affirmative. First and foremost, what happened toyou is classified as a quasi-delict, as defined by Article 2176 of the Civil

    Code:

    Whoever by act or omission causes damage to another, there being

    fault or negligence, is obliged to pay for the damage done. Such fault

    or negligence, if there is no pre-existing contractual relation between

    the parties, is called a quasi-delict and is governed by the provisions

    of this Chapter.

    Furthermore, Article 2180 of the same Code provides that:

    The obligation imposed by Article 2176 is demandable not only for

    one's own acts or omissions, but also for those of persons for whom

    one is responsible. . . . The owners and managers of an establishment

  • 8/11/2019 Legal Writing - Part 2 -Legal Opinion

    2/2

    or enterprise are likewise responsible for damages caused by their

    employees in the service of the branches in which the latter are

    employed or on the occasion of their functions. . . .

    Indeed, it is well-settled that moral damages are awarded to

    compensate and alleviate in some way the physical suffering, mental

    anguish, fright, serious anxiety, besmirched reputation, wounded feelings,

    moral shock, social humiliation and similar injury unjustly caused a person

    (Mangaliag v. Catubig-Pastoral, 474 SCRA 153). To sustain such claim, it is

    required that the damages [enumerated] must be shown to be the

    proximate result of a wrongful act or omission. (B.F. Metal Corp. v.

    Lomotan, 551 SCRA 618) Ultimately, Article 2219 of the Civil Code provides

    that moral damages may be recovered in cases of quasi-delicts causingphysical injuries.

    Undeniably, there was negligence on the part of the crew members

    of McBee-Metropark Branch and such negligence was the proximate cause

    of your fall and the resulting physical pains you have suffered. So also, such

    negligence is a clear case of quasi-delict as defined in the above cited

    provisions of law for which the McBee Foods Corporation is clearly liable as

    an employer.

    Lastly, you may also claim for such other damages that the court, in

    its discretion, may deemed proper since Article 2202 of the Civil Code

    provides that, in crimes and quasi-delicts, the defendant shall be liable for

    all damages which are the natural and probable consequences of the act or

    omission complained of.

    One thing: the foregoing opinion is based on the laws and the

    jurisprudence applicable to your situation. If by any circumstance you take

    your plight to court, we are confident that the case will be decided in yourfavor.

    Very truly yours,

    Lawyer