Lee (Medical Tourism in Costa Rica)

download Lee (Medical Tourism in Costa Rica)

of 4

Transcript of Lee (Medical Tourism in Costa Rica)

  • 7/31/2019 Lee (Medical Tourism in Costa Rica)

    1/4

    1

    PROPOSAL FOR MINI-STATEMENT OF THE CAGH TAKES A STAND

    MEDICAL TOURISM IN COSTA RICA

    By Courtney Lee

    Health tourism, defined in a broad sense, is nothing new-- for thousands of years, people have

    traveled to foreign lands for healing purposes. In the past century, it was the more developed

    nations of the world that were considered popular medical tourist destinations because thesenations had the education and technology to provide high quality medical services that may have

    been unavailable in many developing nations. Today, however, this trend is being reversed.

    With health care systems in crisis in the developed world, patients and insurers are now seeking

    high quality, low cost health care options outside of their national borders. This form of health

    travel has grown tremendously in the past decade and has been labeled medical tourism by the

    media and industry actors. Though this term has been criticized by some for its suggestion of

    leisure and frivolity and its disregard for more urgent cases wherein patients travel for procedures

    that are unavailable in their home country (Kangas 2010), I use the term medical tourism

    throughout my research nonetheless because I am referring to the formal industry and this is what

    this industry has dubbed itself.

    In 2007, 750,000 Americans traveled abroad for medical care. This is projected to increase to

    more than 1.6 million by 2012, with sustainable annual growth of 35% (Deloitte 2009). Powerfulplayers with interests in the industry have made incredible ideological and financial investments

    in medical tourism, which has translated into media inundation with upbeat, optimistic accounts

    of medical tourism and its benefits and muted criticisms. Very few questions have been asked

    about the potential harms of this industry for health systems in destination countries to which

    patients are traveling. Ethnographic perspectives on medical tourism are especially lacking, and

    yet are an important means to bring to light the local worlds that are often overshadowed by more

    powerful forces, as well as the effects that medical tourism has on understandings of health care.

    Medical tourism represents a fundamental shift in the way that we think about health care in a

    global world. No longer a merely local activity, this flow of patients occurs across lines of

    national and regional income disparities, and across social class divisions. Its very existence and

    prosperity depends upon these divisions, as well as entrenched inequalities within and between

    nations. Critical anthropological research of medical tourism needs to be undertaken to addressthe potential implications that medical tourism can have within destination countries with varied

    political, economic and social situations.

    A growing number of Latin American nations are becoming involved as the medical tourism

    industry expands. The number of facilities in Latin America that are accredited by the

    international arm of Joint Commission (which accredits U.S. hospitals grew from 10 in 2006 to

    44 in 2011 (Joint Commission International 2011). The Latin American region largely focuses on

    cosmetic and elective surgeries for medical tourists, although there have been concerted efforts

    recently to promote medical interventions beyond the scope of elective cosmetic procedures,

    which are more profitable for hospitals.

    I conducted a year of ethnographic research in Costa Rica to examine local perceptions of

    medical tourism and the potential impacts that medical tourism has on the socialized health care

    system. In Costa Rica, health care provision is public, controlled by the Costa Rican SocialSecurity Administration (Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social, or CCSS) which, by law, must

    cover all Costa Rican citizens. With a national GDP far eclipsed by the industrialized nations of

    the world, Costa Rican health indices are among the best in Latin America and rival many of the

    most developed nations of the world. This Central American success story is lauded as a

    potential role model for other developing nations seeking to achieve health without wealth

    (Morgan 1987). This made it an interesting case study for examining the interaction between

    medical tourism as a global private industry and local health care delivery, which is a public

    endeavor.

  • 7/31/2019 Lee (Medical Tourism in Costa Rica)

    2/4

  • 7/31/2019 Lee (Medical Tourism in Costa Rica)

    3/4

    3

    impactthatthisshiftmighthaveonthenationalhealthsystem,potentiallycreatinga

    contradictorydualtrackofmedicalcare-aprivatesectorprimarilydrivenbyprofit

    versusapublicsectorresponsibleforthehealthofallofitscitizens(e.g.Brotherton2008;

    Rylko-BaurandFarmer2002;Wilson2006).

    The socialized health system in Costa Rica, founded on principles of solidarity, equity, and

    universal access is a national symbol of Costa Rican values. Although there may have been

    negative opinions of how the CCSS operates in Costa Rica, throughout my research, no oneargued that the CCSS shoud not exist or once questioned the logic that that wealthier Costa

    Ricans subsidize health care for the poor. Costa Ricans love the CCSS system, and are deservedly

    proud of its achievements. It is when this social mentality is positioned alongside a model of

    private for-profit health care, that these messages of solidarity get convoluted. One CCSS nurse

    stated:

    I think what is happening now with this type of tourism, is that its making the private

    sector grow. They are building hotels right next to these hospitals, or in the hospitals

    andwell, you can see the connection. So the private hospitals are growing but it is

    only for a certain group that has acquisitive capacity and has foreign capital. In a

    certain way, this brings changes to our culture. Because medical tourism is for people

    with higher income, and above all for foreigners-- this changes the character of ourculture. It becomes more elite focused and things happen that are for this other

    population, not for Costa Ricans (Personal Interviews 2009-2010).

    In addition to ideological shifts in thinking that medical tourism presents, a few participants

    felt that it was at its core an unethical or exploitive practice, taking advantage of the lower health

    care costs in Costa Rica rather than fixing the problems of the health systems from which medical

    tourists are coming. An academic in Costa Rica said if you take resources away here from Costa

    Ricans, then you are doing something wrong and you just do it, because those people coming here

    can pay so much money (Personal Interviews 2009-2010).

    In Costa Rica the benefits of medical tourism seem to be little more than hypothetical and no

    direct benefits can yet be identified for the public health system. It appears instead that there are

    concerns that the industry, if not controlled properly, might do more harm than good to the public

    health system. Costa Rica today is caught between two competing visions of nationaldevelopment- on one hand adhering to principles of socialized medicine that have allowed for its

    noteworthy achievements of the past, and on the other, a vision of neoliberal growth and

    establishing its position within the global marketplace. Confronted with industries like medical

    tourism, which is one example, but not the only example of this neoliberal vision, the state finds

    itself in a contradictory role, promoting a national ideology based on social medicine for Costa

    Ricans within the public sector, while at the same time opening its borders to foreigners who

    come to consume private sector services which local Costa Ricans cannot afford.

    At present, medical tourism is operated as a business, separated from the Costa Rican

    national health care system in all but the most superficial ways. Current evidence indicates that

    there is very little benefit to the public system, and in fact, there is real potential for harm. To

    maximize the benefits and reduce negative impacts of medical tourism to health systems, there is

    a need for regulatory measures and oversight of global private industries like medical tourism toensures socially responsible practices and sustain the health care achievements that Costa Rica

    has made in the past century, rather than dismantle them. To this end, more critical attention is

    needed to the ways in which the practice of medical tourism interacts with and impacts existing

    health systems globally.

  • 7/31/2019 Lee (Medical Tourism in Costa Rica)

    4/4

    4

    Brotherton, Pierre Sean. 2008. "We have to think like capitalists but continue being socialists:

    medicalized subjectivities, emergent capital, and socialist entrepreneurs in post-soviet

    cuba."American Ethnologistno. 35 (2):259-274.

    Clark, Mary. 2010. "The Recentralization of Health Care Reform in Costa Rica." Occasional

    Paper prepared for the Center for Inter-American Policy and Research (CIPR).

    Deloitte. 2009. Medical Tourism: Update and Implicatins. edited by Deloitte Center for Health

    Solutions: Deloitte Center for Health Solutions,.Homedes, Nuria, and Antonio Ugalde. 2002. "Privatizacin de los servicios de salud: las

    experiencias de Chile y Costa Rica." Gaceta Sanitaria no. 16 (1):54-62.

    Joint Commission International. 2011.JCI Accredited Organizations 2011 [cited July 12, 2011

    2011]. Available from http://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/JCI-Accredited-

    Organizations/

    Kangas, Beth. 2010. "Traveling for Medical Care in a Global World."Medical Anthropology no.

    29 (4):344-362.

    Morgan, Lynn. 1987. "Health Without Wealth? Costa Ricas Health System under Economic

    Crisis."Journal of Public Health Policy no. 8 (1):86-105.

    Personal Interviews. 2009-2010. Personal interviews with Courtney Lee. San Jos, Costa Rica.

    Rylko-Baur, B, and Paul Farmer. 2002. "Managed Care or Managed inequality? A Call for

    Critiques of Market Based Medicine."Medical Anthropology Quarterly no. 16 (4):476-502.

    Shaffer, Ellen R., Howard Waitzkin, Joseph Brenner, and Rebecca Jasso-Aguilar. 2005. "Health

    Policy and Ethics: Global Trade in Public Health."American Journal of Public Health

    no. 95 (1):23-34.

    Wilson, Ara. 2006. Medical Tourism, Neoliberal Populism and the Body Economy in Thailand.

    Paper read at American Anthropological Association, at Atlanta.