Led by Prof Mark Henaghan, Dean of Law, Otago University With the participation of: Prof Don Evans,...
-
Upload
junior-little -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Led by Prof Mark Henaghan, Dean of Law, Otago University With the participation of: Prof Don Evans,...
Led by Prof Mark Henaghan, Dean of Law, Otago University
With the participation of:Prof Don Evans, Director, Bioethics Centre, Otago
Prof Stephen Robertson, Women’s and Children’s Health, OtagoDrs Ian Morison & Tony Merriman, Biochemistry Dept, Otago
Prof Sheila McLean, Law and Ethics in Medicine, Glasgow UniversityAssoc Prof Mildred Cho, Center for Biomedical Ethics & Pediatrics Dept, Stanford
Mr Bevan Tipene-Matua, Canterbury Polytechnic Institute of Technology
Funded by NZ Law Foundation
web: www.otago.ac.nz/law/genome
e-mail: [email protected]
Making Better Decisions?An indigenous perspective of PGD
Danny Tuato’oFebruary 2006
NGÄ RÄ O MUA
TohungaWhakatö tamarikiWhakapä WhakataheMakutuTapu
NGÄ MAHI Ä NGÄ TUPUNA
Ancestral activity informs
the present generation
Rawiri Taiwhanga
What is PGD?If you know of the whereabouts
of a PGD, please get in touch...
PGD in Progress
Submissions to NECAHR Mäori Focus Group
1. PGD is not necessarily a major health issue for Mäori
2. A need for an overarching Mäori ethical framework
3. Treaty principles should also be used as a framework
4. Funding/access/equity5. Funding for Mäori counsellors6. Concerns about HLA tissue typing7. The process of consultation (ongoing)8. The need for community education
HART Act 20044 Principles
All persons exercising powers or performing functions under this Act must be guided by each of the following principles that is relevant to the particular power or function:(f) the needs, values, and beliefs of Maori should be considered and treated with respect
NGÄ UARA O NGÄ TIKANGAA number of values underpin tikanga -
Ira Tangata
TapuMana
Whakapapa
Wairua
Tikanga: Living by Maori Values. Mead: 2003
Maori Custom and values in New Zealand Law. 2001
He Hinatore ki te Ao Maori. 2001
Ira Tängata
DefinitionThe word ira means ‘life principle’ or morespecifically ‘gene’ (Taura Whiri i te Reo Mäori 1996:164), while tangata means human. Ira
tängata thus refers specifically to a human life that
has inherited a collection of genes from the
parents. The genes are more than biological elements, however. There is a godlike and spiritual
quality to all of them because as human beings, ira
tangata descend from ira Atua, the Gods(Mead 2003:42)
Tapu• Tapu is a principle which acts as a corrective
and coherent power• Code for social conduct based essentially on
keeping safe and avoiding risk• Protection and prohibition• Tapu is pervasive and touches all other
attributes. It is like a personal force field which can be felt and sensed by others. It is the sacred life force which supports mauri (spark of life) . . . It reflects the state of the whole person.
ManaKo te mana i ahau,
Nö öku tupuna, nö tua whakarere
My power, authority and integrity comes from my ancestors, from time
out of mind.
Whakapapa
Ko te whakapapa, te tatai mai o te tangata mai i nga
atua ka whakaheke haere ki te tangata tuturu.
Whakapapa is a metaphysical framework constructed
to place onself within the world. It is a principle that
orders the universe.
“Knowing the whakapapa provides the framework for
making decisions about the rights and wrongs of a thing.
It can tell you whether it is natural or unnatural, appropriate or inappropriate.” Roberts & Fairweather 2004:15
Mäori Ethical Framework
• A Mäori framework for all new technology• Tikanga Mäori is sometimes referred to as a
framework of assessment. It provides a method for assessing a situation or event that challenges our thinking and values. The key point is that the framework provides a position not the position.
• It is difficult to imagine any social situation where tikanga has no place. Ceremonies relating to life itself – birth, marriage, sickness and death – are firmly embedded in tikanga. (Mead 2003:5)
Concept of Balance
“ . . . Mäori lay great emphasis upon the conceptof balance. Indeed, it is often very helpful to see ethical problems, especially those that result in conflict, as related to a disturbance in the proper balance of things. In this case, solution of the problem resides in restoration of balance . . . “
Ethical Issues of New and Emerging Technologies. October 1999. Report No. 104
Tikanga Framework
Test 1: TapuStarting point : Does PGD breach tapu?
Test 2: MauriWhat are the risks to the future child?
Does an embryo biopsy damage mauri?Is an implanted embryo “different”?
Test 3: Take-utu-eaTest 4: PrecedentTest 5: Principles
5.1 Whanaungatanga5.2 Manaakitanga5.3 Mana5.4 Noa5.5 Tika
Tikanga Framework
Making Better Decisions?When values and beliefs conflictthere are rarely answers that areclearly right, at best there is ananswer that is most acceptable . . .
The tests identified here could be useful to families confronted by the dilemna of having to decide whether to participate in new technologies, new cures for medical problems, and new ways of doing things.
Mead 2003: 350