Lecture III
-
Upload
candice-cross -
Category
Documents
-
view
21 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Lecture III
![Page 1: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Lecture III
Factorization approaches
SCET
![Page 2: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outlines
• Introduction
• B! form factor
• Nonleptonic decays
• Charming penguin
• Summary
![Page 3: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction• An effective theory by integrating out high energ
y (E) modes.• Effective degrees of freedom: collinear fields, sof
t fields,…• Express an amplitude in 1/E in terms of the effec
tive operators.• The Wilson coefficients of these operators are th
e hard kernels. • The (nonlocal) matrix element of the operators a
re DAs (or form factors).• Convenient for deriving factorization theorem.
![Page 4: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
B! form factor• Kinematics
• Soft spectator in B, r» • If p2» mb, pg
2=(p2-r)2=-2r¢ p2» O(mb)
• Then the internal quark is off-shell by (mbv+k+pg)2-mb
2» O(mb2 )
• SCET is careful in matching at different scales.
![Page 5: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Matching• Demonstrate the matching in SCET
• Full theory! SCETI: integrating out the lines off-shell by mb
2
C()J(0)()! C()()J(0)
gT(0)J(1)(0)
b
W
mb2
mb
Wilson coeff at SCETI2
1/mb suppressedcurrent
Power scaling mb-3/2
from HQET
![Page 6: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• SCETI! SCETII: integrating out the lines off-shell by mb
J(0,)O()
2
Jet=Wilson coeff at SCETII
=hard kernel in PQCD
! T(0)J(0,)M()B()
Power scaling mb-1/2
Two terms have the same power scaling.
![Page 7: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Comparison
• The fundamental inputs, B meson transition forjm factors, are treated differently in different approaches.
• fNF is not calculable, so FB is not in QCDF. No matching at mb. Just input it from sum rules.
• FNF is factorizable in kT factorization theorem, so FB is in PQCD. No matching at mb. Input B from sum rules, and compute FB.
• FB contains both fNF and fF, so it is a mixture in SCET. They are determined from the fit to the B! data.
![Page 8: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Nonleptonic decays
• SCET can be applied to nonleptonic decays. The result for B! MM’ is
![Page 9: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Charming penguin
• SCET gives another example that the leading amplitude in a nonleptonic decay does not need to be in the BSW form.
• At leading power, no alrge source of strong phases in SCET (no annihilation) .
• Long-distance charming penguin is then introduced, parameterized as Acc.
![Page 10: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Decay amplitude• SCET factotrization formula for B! M1M2
Color-allowed
Color-suppressed
factorizable
Wilson coeff
Wilson coeff
![Page 11: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Comment on charming penguin• Charming penguin is factorizable at leadin
g power (see BBNS). • Compute one-loop correction to the charm
loop, and see no IR divergence.• No need for additional nonperturbative par
ameter at leading power.• IR divergence could appear at next-to-lead
ing power.• Then annihilation should be also formulate
d into SCET.
![Page 12: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Fit to data• Do not compute the jet function J(s(mb))
• Determine complex Acc, real B, real JB=
s dz JB(z) from the B!data,
Absorb JB+, from somewhere
![Page 13: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Results
• Small FB
• Acc dominates penguin contribution
• Predict
Why is Pso large?
![Page 14: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Amplitude parameterization• I can get the same “prediction” using T, C, P, assuming
C to be real, same as in SCET---4 parameters with 4 inputs.
• The 00 amplitude is fixed by the isospin relation.• A stringent test will be B! K modes. Need more parame
ters.
p2+0: T+C
+-: T+Pp200: P-C
![Page 15: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Amplitude topologies
![Page 16: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Summary (Beneke at CKM 2005)
SCET
QCDF/PQCD
QCDF/SCET
PQCD
![Page 17: Lecture III](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56813191550346895d980341/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Summary
• QCDF, PQCD, SCET go beyond FA.• They have different assumptions, whose
verification or falsification may not be easy.• They all have interesting phenomenological
applications.• Huge uncertainty from QCDF is annoying. Input
from time-like form factor for annihilation?• NLO correction in PQCD needs to be checked. • SCET should be applied to explore heavy quark
decay dynamics more.