Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer...
Transcript of Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer...
![Page 1: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Lecture 3Harmonic Analysis
Davar Khoshnevisan
Department of MathematicsUniversity of Utah
http://www.math.utah.edu/˜davar
Summer School on Levy Processes: Theory and ApplicationsAugust 9–12, 2007
Sandbjerg Manor, Denmark
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 1 / 15
![Page 2: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I If f ∈ L1(Rd), then its Fourier transform is
(F f )(ξ) := f (ξ) :=Z
Rdeiξ·x f (x)dx ∀ξ ∈ Rd .
I The inversion theorem: If f , f ∈ L1(Rd), then a.e.,
f (x) =1
(2π)d
ZRd
e−ix ·ξ f (ξ)dξ.
In particular, f has a uniformly continuous “version.”[A(Rd) := L1(Rd)∩F−1(L1(Rd)) := the Wiener algebra]
I µ(ξ) :=R
Rd exp(ix · ξ)µ(dx) for all finite Borel measures µ on Rd .I Parseval’s identity:
Rf (x)µ(dx) =
Rf (ξ)µ(ξ)dξ.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 2 / 15
![Page 3: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I If f ∈ L1(Rd), then its Fourier transform is
(F f )(ξ) := f (ξ) :=Z
Rdeiξ·x f (x)dx ∀ξ ∈ Rd .
I The inversion theorem: If f , f ∈ L1(Rd), then a.e.,
f (x) =1
(2π)d
ZRd
e−ix ·ξ f (ξ)dξ.
In particular, f has a uniformly continuous “version.”[A(Rd) := L1(Rd)∩F−1(L1(Rd)) := the Wiener algebra]
I µ(ξ) :=R
Rd exp(ix · ξ)µ(dx) for all finite Borel measures µ on Rd .I Parseval’s identity:
Rf (x)µ(dx) =
Rf (ξ)µ(ξ)dξ.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 2 / 15
![Page 4: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I If f ∈ L1(Rd), then its Fourier transform is
(F f )(ξ) := f (ξ) :=Z
Rdeiξ·x f (x)dx ∀ξ ∈ Rd .
I The inversion theorem: If f , f ∈ L1(Rd), then a.e.,
f (x) =1
(2π)d
ZRd
e−ix ·ξ f (ξ)dξ.
In particular, f has a uniformly continuous “version.”[A(Rd) := L1(Rd)∩F−1(L1(Rd)) := the Wiener algebra]
I µ(ξ) :=R
Rd exp(ix · ξ)µ(dx) for all finite Borel measures µ on Rd .
I Parseval’s identity:R
f (x)µ(dx) =R
f (ξ)µ(ξ)dξ.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 2 / 15
![Page 5: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I If f ∈ L1(Rd), then its Fourier transform is
(F f )(ξ) := f (ξ) :=Z
Rdeiξ·x f (x)dx ∀ξ ∈ Rd .
I The inversion theorem: If f , f ∈ L1(Rd), then a.e.,
f (x) =1
(2π)d
ZRd
e−ix ·ξ f (ξ)dξ.
In particular, f has a uniformly continuous “version.”[A(Rd) := L1(Rd)∩F−1(L1(Rd)) := the Wiener algebra]
I µ(ξ) :=R
Rd exp(ix · ξ)µ(dx) for all finite Borel measures µ on Rd .I Parseval’s identity:
Rf (x)µ(dx) =
Rf (ξ)µ(ξ)dξ.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 2 / 15
![Page 6: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I Define for all r > 0 and x ∈ Rd ,
φr (x) :=d
∏j=1
1− cos(2rxj)
2πrx2j
.
I φr ∈ L1(Rd)+, and
φr (ξ) =d
∏j=1
(1−
|ξj |2r
)+
[Polya’s kernel]
I ξ ∈ B(0 , r) ⇒ |ξj | ≤ r ⇒ φr (ξ) ≥ 2−d .
I ∴ 1B(0,r)(ξ) ≤ 2d φr (ξ).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 3 / 15
![Page 7: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I Define for all r > 0 and x ∈ Rd ,
φr (x) :=d
∏j=1
1− cos(2rxj)
2πrx2j
.
I φr ∈ L1(Rd)+, and
φr (ξ) =d
∏j=1
(1−
|ξj |2r
)+
[Polya’s kernel]
I ξ ∈ B(0 , r) ⇒ |ξj | ≤ r ⇒ φr (ξ) ≥ 2−d .
I ∴ 1B(0,r)(ξ) ≤ 2d φr (ξ).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 3 / 15
![Page 8: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I Define for all r > 0 and x ∈ Rd ,
φr (x) :=d
∏j=1
1− cos(2rxj)
2πrx2j
.
I φr ∈ L1(Rd)+, and
φr (ξ) =d
∏j=1
(1−
|ξj |2r
)+
[Polya’s kernel]
I ξ ∈ B(0 , r) ⇒ |ξj | ≤ r ⇒ φr (ξ) ≥ 2−d .
I ∴ 1B(0,r)(ξ) ≤ 2d φr (ξ).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 3 / 15
![Page 9: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I Define for all r > 0 and x ∈ Rd ,
φr (x) :=d
∏j=1
1− cos(2rxj)
2πrx2j
.
I φr ∈ L1(Rd)+, and
φr (ξ) =d
∏j=1
(1−
|ξj |2r
)+
[Polya’s kernel]
I ξ ∈ B(0 , r) ⇒ |ξj | ≤ r ⇒ φr (ξ) ≥ 2−d .
I ∴ 1B(0,r)(ξ) ≤ 2d φr (ξ).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 3 / 15
![Page 10: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I Define for all r > 0 and x ∈ Rd ,
φr (x) :=d
∏j=1
1− cos(2rxj)
2πrx2j
.
I φr ∈ L1(Rd)+, and
φr (ξ) =d
∏j=1
(1−
|ξj |2r
)+
[Polya’s kernel]
I ξ ∈ B(0 , r) ⇒ |ξj | ≤ r ⇒ φr (ξ) ≥ 2−d .
I ∴ 1B(0,r)(ξ) ≤ 2d φr (ξ).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 3 / 15
![Page 11: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I φr (x) := ∏dj=1
1−cos(2rxj )
2πrx2j
.
I 1B(0,r)(ξ) ≤ 2d φr (ξ).
I Therefore,
P{Z ∈ B(0 , r)} ≤ 2d E(φr (Z )
)
= 2dZ
Rdφr (z)µ(dz)
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)µ(x)dx [Parseval]
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)E
[eix ·Z
]dx .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 4 / 15
![Page 12: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I φr (x) := ∏dj=1
1−cos(2rxj )
2πrx2j
.
I 1B(0,r)(ξ) ≤ 2d φr (ξ).
I Therefore,
P{Z ∈ B(0 , r)} ≤ 2d E(φr (Z )
)
= 2dZ
Rdφr (z)µ(dz)
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)µ(x)dx [Parseval]
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)E
[eix ·Z
]dx .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 4 / 15
![Page 13: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I φr (x) := ∏dj=1
1−cos(2rxj )
2πrx2j
.
I 1B(0,r)(ξ) ≤ 2d φr (ξ).
I Therefore,
P{Z ∈ B(0 , r)} ≤ 2d E(φr (Z )
)
= 2dZ
Rdφr (z)µ(dz)
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)µ(x)dx [Parseval]
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)E
[eix ·Z
]dx .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 4 / 15
![Page 14: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I φr (x) := ∏dj=1
1−cos(2rxj )
2πrx2j
.
I 1B(0,r)(ξ) ≤ 2d φr (ξ).
I Therefore,
P{Z ∈ B(0 , r)} ≤ 2d E(φr (Z )
)
= 2dZ
Rdφr (z)µ(dz)
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)µ(x)dx [Parseval]
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)E
[eix ·Z
]dx .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 4 / 15
![Page 15: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I φr (x) := ∏dj=1
1−cos(2rxj )
2πrx2j
.
I 1B(0,r)(ξ) ≤ 2d φr (ξ).
I Therefore,
P{Z ∈ B(0 , r)} ≤ 2d E(φr (Z )
)= 2d
ZRd
φr (z)µ(dz)
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)µ(x)dx [Parseval]
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)E
[eix ·Z
]dx .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 4 / 15
![Page 16: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I φr (x) := ∏dj=1
1−cos(2rxj )
2πrx2j
.
I 1B(0,r)(ξ) ≤ 2d φr (ξ).
I Therefore,
P{Z ∈ B(0 , r)} ≤ 2d E(φr (Z )
)= 2d
ZRd
φr (z)µ(dz)
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)µ(x)dx [Parseval]
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)E
[eix ·Z
]dx .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 4 / 15
![Page 17: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I φr (x) := ∏dj=1
1−cos(2rxj )
2πrx2j
.
I 1B(0,r)(ξ) ≤ 2d φr (ξ).
I Therefore,
P{Z ∈ B(0 , r)} ≤ 2d E(φr (Z )
)= 2d
ZRd
φr (z)µ(dz)
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)µ(x)dx [Parseval]
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)E
[eix ·Z
]dx .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 4 / 15
![Page 18: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I φr (x) := ∏dj=1
1−cos(2rxj )
2πrx2j
.
I 1B(0,r)(ξ) ≤ 2d φr (ξ).
I Therefore,
P{Z ∈ B(0 , r)} ≤ 2d E(φr (Z )
)= 2d
ZRd
φr (z)µ(dz)
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)µ(x)dx [Parseval]
= 2dZ
Rdφr (x)E
[eix ·Z
]dx .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 4 / 15
![Page 19: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I P{Z ∈ B(0 , ε)} ≤ 2d RRd φε(ξ)E[eiξ·Z ]dξ.
I Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ 2dZ ∞
0
ZRd
φε(ξ)e−tΨ(ξ) dξe−t dt
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)
Z ∞
0e−t{1+Ψ(ξ)} dt dξ
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)Re
(1
1 + Ψ(ξ)
)︸ ︷︷ ︸
κ(ξ)
dξ.
I (1− cosz)/z2 ≤ c1/(1 + z2). Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ c2
ZRd
κ(ξ/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ := c2W (ε).
[The Cauchy transform; ∃ a converse]
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 5 / 15
![Page 20: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I P{Z ∈ B(0 , ε)} ≤ 2d RRd φε(ξ)E[eiξ·Z ]dξ.
I Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ 2dZ ∞
0
ZRd
φε(ξ)e−tΨ(ξ) dξe−t dt
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)
Z ∞
0e−t{1+Ψ(ξ)} dt dξ
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)Re
(1
1 + Ψ(ξ)
)︸ ︷︷ ︸
κ(ξ)
dξ.
I (1− cosz)/z2 ≤ c1/(1 + z2). Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ c2
ZRd
κ(ξ/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ := c2W (ε).
[The Cauchy transform; ∃ a converse]
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 5 / 15
![Page 21: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I P{Z ∈ B(0 , ε)} ≤ 2d RRd φε(ξ)E[eiξ·Z ]dξ.
I Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ 2dZ ∞
0
ZRd
φε(ξ)e−tΨ(ξ) dξe−t dt
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)
Z ∞
0e−t{1+Ψ(ξ)} dt dξ
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)Re
(1
1 + Ψ(ξ)
)︸ ︷︷ ︸
κ(ξ)
dξ.
I (1− cosz)/z2 ≤ c1/(1 + z2). Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ c2
ZRd
κ(ξ/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ := c2W (ε).
[The Cauchy transform; ∃ a converse]
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 5 / 15
![Page 22: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I P{Z ∈ B(0 , ε)} ≤ 2d RRd φε(ξ)E[eiξ·Z ]dξ.
I Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ 2dZ ∞
0
ZRd
φε(ξ)e−tΨ(ξ) dξe−t dt
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)
Z ∞
0e−t{1+Ψ(ξ)} dt dξ
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)Re
(1
1 + Ψ(ξ)
)︸ ︷︷ ︸
κ(ξ)
dξ.
I (1− cosz)/z2 ≤ c1/(1 + z2). Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ c2
ZRd
κ(ξ/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ := c2W (ε).
[The Cauchy transform; ∃ a converse]
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 5 / 15
![Page 23: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I P{Z ∈ B(0 , ε)} ≤ 2d RRd φε(ξ)E[eiξ·Z ]dξ.
I Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ 2dZ ∞
0
ZRd
φε(ξ)e−tΨ(ξ) dξe−t dt
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)
Z ∞
0e−t{1+Ψ(ξ)} dt dξ
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)Re
(1
1 + Ψ(ξ)
)︸ ︷︷ ︸
κ(ξ)
dξ.
I (1− cosz)/z2 ≤ c1/(1 + z2). Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ c2
ZRd
κ(ξ/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ := c2W (ε).
[The Cauchy transform; ∃ a converse]
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 5 / 15
![Page 24: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I P{Z ∈ B(0 , ε)} ≤ 2d RRd φε(ξ)E[eiξ·Z ]dξ.
I Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ 2dZ ∞
0
ZRd
φε(ξ)e−tΨ(ξ) dξe−t dt
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)
Z ∞
0e−t{1+Ψ(ξ)} dt dξ
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)Re
(1
1 + Ψ(ξ)
)︸ ︷︷ ︸
κ(ξ)
dξ.
I (1− cosz)/z2 ≤ c1/(1 + z2). Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ c2
ZRd
κ(ξ/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ
:= c2W (ε).
[The Cauchy transform; ∃ a converse]
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 5 / 15
![Page 25: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I P{Z ∈ B(0 , ε)} ≤ 2d RRd φε(ξ)E[eiξ·Z ]dξ.
I Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ 2dZ ∞
0
ZRd
φε(ξ)e−tΨ(ξ) dξe−t dt
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)
Z ∞
0e−t{1+Ψ(ξ)} dt dξ
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)Re
(1
1 + Ψ(ξ)
)︸ ︷︷ ︸
κ(ξ)
dξ.
I (1− cosz)/z2 ≤ c1/(1 + z2). Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ c2
ZRd
κ(ξ/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ
:= c2W (ε).
[The Cauchy transform; ∃ a converse]
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 5 / 15
![Page 26: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd)
I P{Z ∈ B(0 , ε)} ≤ 2d RRd φε(ξ)E[eiξ·Z ]dξ.
I Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ 2dZ ∞
0
ZRd
φε(ξ)e−tΨ(ξ) dξe−t dt
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)
Z ∞
0e−t{1+Ψ(ξ)} dt dξ
= 2dZ
Rdφε(ξ)Re
(1
1 + Ψ(ξ)
)︸ ︷︷ ︸
κ(ξ)
dξ.
I (1− cosz)/z2 ≤ c1/(1 + z2). Therefore,
U(B(0 , ε)) ≤ c2
ZRd
κ(ξ/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ := c2W (ε).
[The Cauchy transform; ∃ a converse]D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 5 / 15
![Page 27: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I exp(−(k/ε)∑dj=1 |zj |) ≤ exp(−(k/ε)‖z‖)
≤ 1B(0,ε)(z) + e−k .
I [k := ε−δ ⇒]
1B(0,ε)(z) ≥ exp
(− 1
ε1−δ
d
∑j=1|zj |)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(s)|
)e−s ds− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 6 / 15
![Page 28: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I exp(−(k/ε)∑dj=1 |zj |) ≤ exp(−(k/ε)‖z‖)
≤ 1B(0,ε)(z) + e−k .
I [k := ε−δ ⇒]
1B(0,ε)(z) ≥ exp
(− 1
ε1−δ
d
∑j=1|zj |)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(s)|
)e−s ds− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 6 / 15
![Page 29: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I exp(−(k/ε)∑dj=1 |zj |) ≤ exp(−(k/ε)‖z‖)
≤ 1B(0,ε)(z) + e−k .
I [k := ε−δ ⇒]
1B(0,ε)(z) ≥ exp
(− 1
ε1−δ
d
∑j=1|zj |)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(s)|
)e−s ds− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 6 / 15
![Page 30: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I exp(−(k/ε)∑dj=1 |zj |) ≤ exp(−(k/ε)‖z‖)
≤ 1B(0,ε)(z) + e−k .I [k := ε−δ ⇒]
1B(0,ε)(z) ≥ exp
(− 1
ε1−δ
d
∑j=1|zj |)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(s)|
)e−s ds− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 6 / 15
![Page 31: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I exp(−(k/ε)∑dj=1 |zj |) ≤ exp(−(k/ε)‖z‖)
≤ 1B(0,ε)(z) + e−k .I [k := ε−δ ⇒]
1B(0,ε)(z) ≥ exp
(− 1
ε1−δ
d
∑j=1|zj |)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(s)|
)e−s ds− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 6 / 15
![Page 32: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I Let C1, . . . ,Cd denote d independent Cauchy random variables,independent of X , and C := (C1 , . . . ,Cd).
I Eexp(iξ ·C) = exp(−∑dj=1 |ξj |).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−λ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−tΨ(λC))
= π−d RRd e−tΨ(λξ)/∏
dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ.
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|
)e−t dt − exp
(−ε−1+δ
)I ≥ π−dW (ε1−δ)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
CorollaryindU = limsupε→0
logW (ε)log ε indU = lim infε→0
logW (ε)log ε .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 7 / 15
![Page 33: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I Let C1, . . . ,Cd denote d independent Cauchy random variables,independent of X , and C := (C1 , . . . ,Cd).
I Eexp(iξ ·C) = exp(−∑dj=1 |ξj |).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−λ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−tΨ(λC))
= π−d RRd e−tΨ(λξ)/∏
dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ.
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|
)e−t dt − exp
(−ε−1+δ
)I ≥ π−dW (ε1−δ)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
CorollaryindU = limsupε→0
logW (ε)log ε indU = lim infε→0
logW (ε)log ε .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 7 / 15
![Page 34: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I Let C1, . . . ,Cd denote d independent Cauchy random variables,independent of X , and C := (C1 , . . . ,Cd).
I Eexp(iξ ·C) = exp(−∑dj=1 |ξj |).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−λ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−tΨ(λC))
= π−d RRd e−tΨ(λξ)/∏
dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ.
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|
)e−t dt − exp
(−ε−1+δ
)I ≥ π−dW (ε1−δ)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
CorollaryindU = limsupε→0
logW (ε)log ε indU = lim infε→0
logW (ε)log ε .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 7 / 15
![Page 35: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I Let C1, . . . ,Cd denote d independent Cauchy random variables,independent of X , and C := (C1 , . . . ,Cd).
I Eexp(iξ ·C) = exp(−∑dj=1 |ξj |).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−λ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−tΨ(λC))
= π−d RRd e−tΨ(λξ)/∏
dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ.
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|
)e−t dt − exp
(−ε−1+δ
)I ≥ π−dW (ε1−δ)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
CorollaryindU = limsupε→0
logW (ε)log ε indU = lim infε→0
logW (ε)log ε .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 7 / 15
![Page 36: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I Let C1, . . . ,Cd denote d independent Cauchy random variables,independent of X , and C := (C1 , . . . ,Cd).
I Eexp(iξ ·C) = exp(−∑dj=1 |ξj |).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−λ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−tΨ(λC))
= π−d RRd e−tΨ(λξ)/∏
dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ.
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|
)e−t dt − exp
(−ε−1+δ
)I ≥ π−dW (ε1−δ)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
CorollaryindU = limsupε→0
logW (ε)log ε indU = lim infε→0
logW (ε)log ε .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 7 / 15
![Page 37: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I Let C1, . . . ,Cd denote d independent Cauchy random variables,independent of X , and C := (C1 , . . . ,Cd).
I Eexp(iξ ·C) = exp(−∑dj=1 |ξj |).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−λ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−tΨ(λC))= π−d R
Rd e−tΨ(λξ)/∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ.
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|
)e−t dt − exp
(−ε−1+δ
)I ≥ π−dW (ε1−δ)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
CorollaryindU = limsupε→0
logW (ε)log ε indU = lim infε→0
logW (ε)log ε .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 7 / 15
![Page 38: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I Let C1, . . . ,Cd denote d independent Cauchy random variables,independent of X , and C := (C1 , . . . ,Cd).
I Eexp(iξ ·C) = exp(−∑dj=1 |ξj |).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−λ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−tΨ(λC))= π−d R
Rd e−tΨ(λξ)/∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ.
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|
)e−t dt − exp
(−ε−1+δ
)
I ≥ π−dW (ε1−δ)− exp(−ε−1+δ
).
CorollaryindU = limsupε→0
logW (ε)log ε indU = lim infε→0
logW (ε)log ε .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 7 / 15
![Page 39: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I Let C1, . . . ,Cd denote d independent Cauchy random variables,independent of X , and C := (C1 , . . . ,Cd).
I Eexp(iξ ·C) = exp(−∑dj=1 |ξj |).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−λ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−tΨ(λC))= π−d R
Rd e−tΨ(λξ)/∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ.
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|
)e−t dt − exp
(−ε−1+δ
)
I ≥ π−dW (ε1−δ)− exp(−ε−1+δ
).
CorollaryindU = limsupε→0
logW (ε)log ε indU = lim infε→0
logW (ε)log ε .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 7 / 15
![Page 40: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I Let C1, . . . ,Cd denote d independent Cauchy random variables,independent of X , and C := (C1 , . . . ,Cd).
I Eexp(iξ ·C) = exp(−∑dj=1 |ξj |).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−λ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−tΨ(λC))= π−d R
Rd e−tΨ(λξ)/∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ.
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|
)e−t dt − exp
(−ε−1+δ
)I ≥ π−dW (ε1−δ)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
CorollaryindU = limsupε→0
logW (ε)log ε indU = lim infε→0
logW (ε)log ε .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 7 / 15
![Page 41: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I Let C1, . . . ,Cd denote d independent Cauchy random variables,independent of X , and C := (C1 , . . . ,Cd).
I Eexp(iξ ·C) = exp(−∑dj=1 |ξj |).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−λ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−tΨ(λC))= π−d R
Rd e−tΨ(λξ)/∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ.
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|
)e−t dt − exp
(−ε−1+δ
)I ≥ π−dW (ε1−δ)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
CorollaryindU = limsupε→0
logW (ε)log ε indU = lim infε→0
logW (ε)log ε .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 7 / 15
![Page 42: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
The Fourier transform on L1(Rd )
I Let C1, . . . ,Cd denote d independent Cauchy random variables,independent of X , and C := (C1 , . . . ,Cd).
I Eexp(iξ ·C) = exp(−∑dj=1 |ξj |).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−λ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|).
I Eexp(iλX (t) ·C) = Eexp(−tΨ(λC))= π−d R
Rd e−tΨ(λξ)/∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ.
I U(B(0 , ε)) ≥ ER∞
0 exp(− 1
ε1−δ ∑dj=1 |Xj(t)|
)e−t dt − exp
(−ε−1+δ
)I ≥ π−dW (ε1−δ)− exp
(−ε−1+δ
).
CorollaryindU = limsupε→0
logW (ε)log ε indU = lim infε→0
logW (ε)log ε .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 7 / 15
![Page 43: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Fourier-analytic dimension formulas
Theorem (Kh-Xiao, 2007)Almost surely,
dimH X ([0 ,1]) = lim infε→0
logW (ε)
log ε,
dimMX ([0 ,1]) = limsupε→0
logW (ε)
log ε,
where
W (ε) :=Z
Rd
κ(ξ/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + ξ2
j )dξ, κ(z) := Re
(1
1 + Ψ(z)
).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 8 / 15
![Page 44: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
ExampleIf X := BM(Rd), then dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = d ∧ 2 a.s.
I Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖2. WLOG λ = 1 [usually 1/2].I Goal: W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I κ(z) = Re(1 + ‖z‖2)−1 = (1 + ‖z‖2)−1.I As ε ↘ 0,
W (ε) =Z
Rd
κ(z/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + z2
j )dz
�Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
:= T1 + T2.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 9 / 15
![Page 45: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
ExampleIf X := BM(Rd), then dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = d ∧ 2 a.s.
I Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖2. WLOG λ = 1 [usually 1/2].
I Goal: W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I κ(z) = Re(1 + ‖z‖2)−1 = (1 + ‖z‖2)−1.I As ε ↘ 0,
W (ε) =Z
Rd
κ(z/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + z2
j )dz
�Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
:= T1 + T2.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 9 / 15
![Page 46: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
ExampleIf X := BM(Rd), then dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = d ∧ 2 a.s.
I Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖2. WLOG λ = 1 [usually 1/2].I Goal: W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).
I κ(z) = Re(1 + ‖z‖2)−1 = (1 + ‖z‖2)−1.I As ε ↘ 0,
W (ε) =Z
Rd
κ(z/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + z2
j )dz
�Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
:= T1 + T2.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 9 / 15
![Page 47: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
ExampleIf X := BM(Rd), then dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = d ∧ 2 a.s.
I Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖2. WLOG λ = 1 [usually 1/2].I Goal: W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I κ(z) = Re(1 + ‖z‖2)−1 = (1 + ‖z‖2)−1.
I As ε ↘ 0,
W (ε) =Z
Rd
κ(z/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + z2
j )dz
�Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
:= T1 + T2.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 9 / 15
![Page 48: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
ExampleIf X := BM(Rd), then dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = d ∧ 2 a.s.
I Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖2. WLOG λ = 1 [usually 1/2].I Goal: W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I κ(z) = Re(1 + ‖z‖2)−1 = (1 + ‖z‖2)−1.I As ε ↘ 0,
W (ε) =Z
Rd
κ(z/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + z2
j )dz
�Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
:= T1 + T2.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 9 / 15
![Page 49: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
ExampleIf X := BM(Rd), then dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = d ∧ 2 a.s.
I Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖2. WLOG λ = 1 [usually 1/2].I Goal: W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I κ(z) = Re(1 + ‖z‖2)−1 = (1 + ‖z‖2)−1.I As ε ↘ 0,
W (ε) =Z
Rd
κ(z/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + z2
j )dz
�Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
:= T1 + T2.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 9 / 15
![Page 50: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
ExampleIf X := BM(Rd), then dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = d ∧ 2 a.s.
I Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖2. WLOG λ = 1 [usually 1/2].I Goal: W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I κ(z) = Re(1 + ‖z‖2)−1 = (1 + ‖z‖2)−1.I As ε ↘ 0,
W (ε) =Z
Rd
κ(z/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + z2
j )dz
�Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
:= T1 + T2.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 9 / 15
![Page 51: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
ExampleIf X := BM(Rd), then dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = d ∧ 2 a.s.
I Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖2. WLOG λ = 1 [usually 1/2].I Goal: W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I κ(z) = Re(1 + ‖z‖2)−1 = (1 + ‖z‖2)−1.I As ε ↘ 0,
W (ε) =Z
Rd
κ(z/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + z2
j )dz
�Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
:= T1 + T2.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 9 / 15
![Page 52: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
ExampleIf X := BM(Rd), then dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = d ∧ 2 a.s.
I Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖2. WLOG λ = 1 [usually 1/2].I Goal: W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I κ(z) = Re(1 + ‖z‖2)−1 = (1 + ‖z‖2)−1.I As ε ↘ 0,
W (ε) =Z
Rd
κ(z/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + z2
j )dz
�Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
:= T1 + T2.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 9 / 15
![Page 53: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
ExampleIf X := BM(Rd), then dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = d ∧ 2 a.s.
I Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖2. WLOG λ = 1 [usually 1/2].I Goal: W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I κ(z) = Re(1 + ‖z‖2)−1 = (1 + ‖z‖2)−1.I As ε ↘ 0,
W (ε) =Z
Rd
κ(z/ε)
∏dj=1(1 + z2
j )dz
�Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
:= T1 + T2.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 9 / 15
![Page 54: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
I If |z|∞ > 1, then 1 + ‖z/ε‖2 � ‖z‖2/ε2. Therefore,
T2 =Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2Z|z|∞>1
dz‖z‖2 ∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2.
I Also,
T1 =Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
�Z‖z‖≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+ Θ(ε2)
�Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 + Θ(ε2).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 10 / 15
![Page 55: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
I If |z|∞ > 1, then 1 + ‖z/ε‖2 � ‖z‖2/ε2. Therefore,
T2 =Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2Z|z|∞>1
dz‖z‖2 ∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2.
I Also,
T1 =Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
�Z‖z‖≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+ Θ(ε2)
�Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 + Θ(ε2).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 10 / 15
![Page 56: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
I If |z|∞ > 1, then 1 + ‖z/ε‖2 � ‖z‖2/ε2. Therefore,
T2 =Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2Z|z|∞>1
dz‖z‖2 ∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2.
I Also,
T1 =Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
�Z‖z‖≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+ Θ(ε2)
�Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 + Θ(ε2).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 10 / 15
![Page 57: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
I If |z|∞ > 1, then 1 + ‖z/ε‖2 � ‖z‖2/ε2. Therefore,
T2 =Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2Z|z|∞>1
dz‖z‖2 ∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2.
I Also,
T1 =Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
�Z‖z‖≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+ Θ(ε2)
�Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 + Θ(ε2).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 10 / 15
![Page 58: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
I If |z|∞ > 1, then 1 + ‖z/ε‖2 � ‖z‖2/ε2. Therefore,
T2 =Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2Z|z|∞>1
dz‖z‖2 ∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2.
I Also,
T1 =Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
�Z‖z‖≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+ Θ(ε2)
�Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 + Θ(ε2).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 10 / 15
![Page 59: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
I If |z|∞ > 1, then 1 + ‖z/ε‖2 � ‖z‖2/ε2. Therefore,
T2 =Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2Z|z|∞>1
dz‖z‖2 ∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2.
I Also,
T1 =Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
�Z‖z‖≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+ Θ(ε2)
�Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 + Θ(ε2).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 10 / 15
![Page 60: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
I If |z|∞ > 1, then 1 + ‖z/ε‖2 � ‖z‖2/ε2. Therefore,
T2 =Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2Z|z|∞>1
dz‖z‖2 ∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2.
I Also,
T1 =Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
�Z‖z‖≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+ Θ(ε2)
�Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 + Θ(ε2).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 10 / 15
![Page 61: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
I If |z|∞ > 1, then 1 + ‖z/ε‖2 � ‖z‖2/ε2. Therefore,
T2 =Z|z|∞>1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2Z|z|∞>1
dz‖z‖2 ∏
dj=1 z2
j
� ε2.
I Also,
T1 =Z|z|∞≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
�Z‖z‖≤1
dz(1 + ‖z/ε‖2)
+ Θ(ε2)
�Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 + Θ(ε2).
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 10 / 15
![Page 62: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
I But Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 �
Z ε
0rd−1 dr + ε2
Z 1
εrd−3 dr .
I Therefore, one can check that
Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 �
ε2 if d ≥ 3,
ε2 log(1/ε) if d = 2,
ε if d = 1.
I Therefore, T2 = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I Therefore, W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I Therefore, dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = (d ∧ 2) a.s.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 11 / 15
![Page 63: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
I But Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 �
Z ε
0rd−1 dr + ε2
Z 1
εrd−3 dr .
I Therefore, one can check that
Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 �
ε2 if d ≥ 3,
ε2 log(1/ε) if d = 2,
ε if d = 1.
I Therefore, T2 = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I Therefore, W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I Therefore, dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = (d ∧ 2) a.s.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 11 / 15
![Page 64: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
I But Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 �
Z ε
0rd−1 dr + ε2
Z 1
εrd−3 dr .
I Therefore, one can check that
Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 �
ε2 if d ≥ 3,
ε2 log(1/ε) if d = 2,
ε if d = 1.
I Therefore, T2 = ε(d∧2)+o(1).
I Therefore, W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I Therefore, dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = (d ∧ 2) a.s.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 11 / 15
![Page 65: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
I But Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 �
Z ε
0rd−1 dr + ε2
Z 1
εrd−3 dr .
I Therefore, one can check that
Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 �
ε2 if d ≥ 3,
ε2 log(1/ε) if d = 2,
ε if d = 1.
I Therefore, T2 = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I Therefore, W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).
I Therefore, dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = (d ∧ 2) a.s.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 11 / 15
![Page 66: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Example: Brownian motion
I But Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 �
Z ε
0rd−1 dr + ε2
Z 1
εrd−3 dr .
I Therefore, one can check that
Z 1
0
rd−1 dr1 + (r/ε)2 �
ε2 if d ≥ 3,
ε2 log(1/ε) if d = 2,
ε if d = 1.
I Therefore, T2 = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I Therefore, W (ε) = ε(d∧2)+o(1).I Therefore, dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = (d ∧ 2) a.s.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 11 / 15
![Page 67: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Example: Subordinators
I X := 1-D nondecreasing Levy process. [Subordinator]
I Eexp(−λX (t)) = exp(−tΦ(λ)) ∀t , λ ≥ 0. [Laplace exponent]I Let C := independent Cauchy:
e−tΦ(λ) = E[e−λX(t)
]
= E[eiλCX(t)
]=
1π
Z ∞
−∞
e−tΨ(zλ)
1 + z2 dz.
I Integrate [e−t dt ]⇒
11 + Φ(λ)
=W (1/λ)
π.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 12 / 15
![Page 68: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Example: Subordinators
I X := 1-D nondecreasing Levy process. [Subordinator]I Eexp(−λX (t)) = exp(−tΦ(λ)) ∀t , λ ≥ 0. [Laplace exponent]
I Let C := independent Cauchy:
e−tΦ(λ) = E[e−λX(t)
]
= E[eiλCX(t)
]=
1π
Z ∞
−∞
e−tΨ(zλ)
1 + z2 dz.
I Integrate [e−t dt ]⇒
11 + Φ(λ)
=W (1/λ)
π.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 12 / 15
![Page 69: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Example: Subordinators
I X := 1-D nondecreasing Levy process. [Subordinator]I Eexp(−λX (t)) = exp(−tΦ(λ)) ∀t , λ ≥ 0. [Laplace exponent]I Let C := independent Cauchy:
e−tΦ(λ) = E[e−λX(t)
]
= E[eiλCX(t)
]=
1π
Z ∞
−∞
e−tΨ(zλ)
1 + z2 dz.
I Integrate [e−t dt ]⇒
11 + Φ(λ)
=W (1/λ)
π.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 12 / 15
![Page 70: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Example: Subordinators
I X := 1-D nondecreasing Levy process. [Subordinator]I Eexp(−λX (t)) = exp(−tΦ(λ)) ∀t , λ ≥ 0. [Laplace exponent]I Let C := independent Cauchy:
e−tΦ(λ) = E[e−λX(t)
]
= E[eiλCX(t)
]=
1π
Z ∞
−∞
e−tΨ(zλ)
1 + z2 dz.
I Integrate [e−t dt ]⇒
11 + Φ(λ)
=W (1/λ)
π.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 12 / 15
![Page 71: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Example: Subordinators
I X := 1-D nondecreasing Levy process. [Subordinator]I Eexp(−λX (t)) = exp(−tΦ(λ)) ∀t , λ ≥ 0. [Laplace exponent]I Let C := independent Cauchy:
e−tΦ(λ) = E[e−λX(t)
]= E
[eiλCX(t)
]
=1π
Z ∞
−∞
e−tΨ(zλ)
1 + z2 dz.
I Integrate [e−t dt ]⇒
11 + Φ(λ)
=W (1/λ)
π.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 12 / 15
![Page 72: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Example: Subordinators
I X := 1-D nondecreasing Levy process. [Subordinator]I Eexp(−λX (t)) = exp(−tΦ(λ)) ∀t , λ ≥ 0. [Laplace exponent]I Let C := independent Cauchy:
e−tΦ(λ) = E[e−λX(t)
]= E
[eiλCX(t)
]=
1π
Z ∞
−∞
e−tΨ(zλ)
1 + z2 dz.
I Integrate [e−t dt ]⇒
11 + Φ(λ)
=W (1/λ)
π.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 12 / 15
![Page 73: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Example: Subordinators
I X := 1-D nondecreasing Levy process. [Subordinator]I Eexp(−λX (t)) = exp(−tΦ(λ)) ∀t , λ ≥ 0. [Laplace exponent]I Let C := independent Cauchy:
e−tΦ(λ) = E[e−λX(t)
]= E
[eiλCX(t)
]=
1π
Z ∞
−∞
e−tΨ(zλ)
1 + z2 dz.
I Integrate [e−t dt ]⇒
11 + Φ(λ)
=W (1/λ)
π.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 12 / 15
![Page 74: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Example: Subordinators
Example (Horowitz, Pruitt–Taylor, Bertoin)X := subordinator with Laplace exponent Φ; a.s.:
dimH X ([0 ,1]) = lim infλ→∞
logΦ(λ)
logλ,
dimMX ([0 ,1]) = limsupλ→∞
logΦ(λ)
logλ.
Fact (Maisonneuve)The zero-set of a rather general Markov process can be identified withthe range of a subordinator; Φ is often fairly explicit.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 13 / 15
![Page 75: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Example: Subordinators
Example (Horowitz, Pruitt–Taylor, Bertoin)X := subordinator with Laplace exponent Φ; a.s.:
dimH X ([0 ,1]) = lim infλ→∞
logΦ(λ)
logλ,
dimMX ([0 ,1]) = limsupλ→∞
logΦ(λ)
logλ.
Fact (Maisonneuve)The zero-set of a rather general Markov process can be identified withthe range of a subordinator; Φ is often fairly explicit.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 13 / 15
![Page 76: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Problems
1. X := an isotropic stable process, index α ∈ (0 ,2]: Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖α.WLOG λ = 1. Prove: dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = (d ∧α) a.s.
2. A classical fact: Given any Levy process X with characteristicexponent Ψ, |Ψ(ξ)| = O(‖ξ‖2). Let X (t) = B(t) + Y (t), where B :=a nondegenerate BM(Rd), and Y is an independent pure-jumpLevy process. Use the preceding fact, without proof, to deducethat dimH X ([0 ,1]) ≥ dimH Y ([0 ,1]) anddimMX ([0 ,1]) ≥ dimMY ([0 ,1] a.s.
3. Let X and X ′ denote two i.i.d. Levy processes in Rd , and defineY (t) := X (t)−X ′(t) to be the symmetrization of X .
3.1 Prove that Y is a Levy process.3.2 Prove that dimY ([0 ,1]) ≤ dimX ([0 ,1]) a.s., where dim stands for
either dimH or dimM .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 14 / 15
![Page 77: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Problems
1. X := an isotropic stable process, index α ∈ (0 ,2]: Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖α.WLOG λ = 1. Prove: dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = (d ∧α) a.s.
2. A classical fact: Given any Levy process X with characteristicexponent Ψ, |Ψ(ξ)| = O(‖ξ‖2). Let X (t) = B(t) + Y (t), where B :=a nondegenerate BM(Rd), and Y is an independent pure-jumpLevy process. Use the preceding fact, without proof, to deducethat dimH X ([0 ,1]) ≥ dimH Y ([0 ,1]) anddimMX ([0 ,1]) ≥ dimMY ([0 ,1] a.s.
3. Let X and X ′ denote two i.i.d. Levy processes in Rd , and defineY (t) := X (t)−X ′(t) to be the symmetrization of X .
3.1 Prove that Y is a Levy process.3.2 Prove that dimY ([0 ,1]) ≤ dimX ([0 ,1]) a.s., where dim stands for
either dimH or dimM .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 14 / 15
![Page 78: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Problems
1. X := an isotropic stable process, index α ∈ (0 ,2]: Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖α.WLOG λ = 1. Prove: dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = (d ∧α) a.s.
2. A classical fact: Given any Levy process X with characteristicexponent Ψ, |Ψ(ξ)| = O(‖ξ‖2). Let X (t) = B(t) + Y (t), where B :=a nondegenerate BM(Rd), and Y is an independent pure-jumpLevy process. Use the preceding fact, without proof, to deducethat dimH X ([0 ,1]) ≥ dimH Y ([0 ,1]) anddimMX ([0 ,1]) ≥ dimMY ([0 ,1] a.s.
3. Let X and X ′ denote two i.i.d. Levy processes in Rd , and defineY (t) := X (t)−X ′(t) to be the symmetrization of X .
3.1 Prove that Y is a Levy process.3.2 Prove that dimY ([0 ,1]) ≤ dimX ([0 ,1]) a.s., where dim stands for
either dimH or dimM .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 14 / 15
![Page 79: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Problems
1. X := an isotropic stable process, index α ∈ (0 ,2]: Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖α.WLOG λ = 1. Prove: dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = (d ∧α) a.s.
2. A classical fact: Given any Levy process X with characteristicexponent Ψ, |Ψ(ξ)| = O(‖ξ‖2). Let X (t) = B(t) + Y (t), where B :=a nondegenerate BM(Rd), and Y is an independent pure-jumpLevy process. Use the preceding fact, without proof, to deducethat dimH X ([0 ,1]) ≥ dimH Y ([0 ,1]) anddimMX ([0 ,1]) ≥ dimMY ([0 ,1] a.s.
3. Let X and X ′ denote two i.i.d. Levy processes in Rd , and defineY (t) := X (t)−X ′(t) to be the symmetrization of X .3.1 Prove that Y is a Levy process.
3.2 Prove that dimY ([0 ,1]) ≤ dimX ([0 ,1]) a.s., where dim stands foreither dimH or dimM .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 14 / 15
![Page 80: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Problems
1. X := an isotropic stable process, index α ∈ (0 ,2]: Ψ(ξ) = λ2‖ξ‖α.WLOG λ = 1. Prove: dimH X ([0 ,1]) = dimMX ([0 ,1]) = (d ∧α) a.s.
2. A classical fact: Given any Levy process X with characteristicexponent Ψ, |Ψ(ξ)| = O(‖ξ‖2). Let X (t) = B(t) + Y (t), where B :=a nondegenerate BM(Rd), and Y is an independent pure-jumpLevy process. Use the preceding fact, without proof, to deducethat dimH X ([0 ,1]) ≥ dimH Y ([0 ,1]) anddimMX ([0 ,1]) ≥ dimMY ([0 ,1] a.s.
3. Let X and X ′ denote two i.i.d. Levy processes in Rd , and defineY (t) := X (t)−X ′(t) to be the symmetrization of X .3.1 Prove that Y is a Levy process.3.2 Prove that dimY ([0 ,1]) ≤ dimX ([0 ,1]) a.s., where dim stands for
either dimH or dimM .
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 14 / 15
![Page 81: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
More advanced problems
1. Suppose B is a one-dimensional Brownian motion, and Y is anindependent one-dimensional symmetric stable process withindex α ∈ (0 ,2).
1.1 Prove that X (t) := (B(t) ,Y (t)) defines a two-dimensional Levyprocess.
1.2 Prove that if α ∈ (1 ,2), then α < dimMX ([0 ,1]) < 2.[Both inequalities are strict.]
2. Suppose X is a Levy process with Ψ(ξ) = ‖ξ‖α+o(1) as ‖ξ‖ →∞.Then, prove that dimMX ([0 ,1]) and dimH X ([0 ,1]) are both d ∧ αa.s.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 15 / 15
![Page 82: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
More advanced problems
1. Suppose B is a one-dimensional Brownian motion, and Y is anindependent one-dimensional symmetric stable process withindex α ∈ (0 ,2).1.1 Prove that X (t) := (B(t) ,Y (t)) defines a two-dimensional Levy
process.
1.2 Prove that if α ∈ (1 ,2), then α < dimMX ([0 ,1]) < 2.[Both inequalities are strict.]
2. Suppose X is a Levy process with Ψ(ξ) = ‖ξ‖α+o(1) as ‖ξ‖ →∞.Then, prove that dimMX ([0 ,1]) and dimH X ([0 ,1]) are both d ∧ αa.s.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 15 / 15
![Page 83: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
More advanced problems
1. Suppose B is a one-dimensional Brownian motion, and Y is anindependent one-dimensional symmetric stable process withindex α ∈ (0 ,2).1.1 Prove that X (t) := (B(t) ,Y (t)) defines a two-dimensional Levy
process.1.2 Prove that if α ∈ (1 ,2), then α < dimMX ([0 ,1]) < 2.
[Both inequalities are strict.]
2. Suppose X is a Levy process with Ψ(ξ) = ‖ξ‖α+o(1) as ‖ξ‖ →∞.Then, prove that dimMX ([0 ,1]) and dimH X ([0 ,1]) are both d ∧ αa.s.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 15 / 15
![Page 84: Lecture 3 - Harmonic Analysis - University of Utahdavar/ps-pdf-files/Denmark07/Lecture3.pdfSummer School on Levy Processes: Theory and Applications´ August 9–12, 2007 Sandbjerg](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050210/5f5cedfa2281505ece252bde/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
More advanced problems
1. Suppose B is a one-dimensional Brownian motion, and Y is anindependent one-dimensional symmetric stable process withindex α ∈ (0 ,2).1.1 Prove that X (t) := (B(t) ,Y (t)) defines a two-dimensional Levy
process.1.2 Prove that if α ∈ (1 ,2), then α < dimMX ([0 ,1]) < 2.
[Both inequalities are strict.]
2. Suppose X is a Levy process with Ψ(ξ) = ‖ξ‖α+o(1) as ‖ξ‖ →∞.Then, prove that dimMX ([0 ,1]) and dimH X ([0 ,1]) are both d ∧ αa.s.
D. Khoshnevisan (Salt Lake City, Utah) Lecture 3 Sandbjerg Manor, 2007 15 / 15