Lecture 23 Part 1: Making a Case for Using IP to Design DWDM Networks
-
Upload
lyle-holman -
Category
Documents
-
view
25 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Lecture 23 Part 1: Making a Case for Using IP to Design DWDM Networks
1
Lecture 23 Part 1: Making a Case for Using IP to Design DWDM Networks
G. Birkan – SMU Student
E. Olinick – SMU Faculty
A. Ortynski – Nortel Networks
G. Spiride – Nortel Networks
Sponsors: ONR and Nortel Networks
Manuscript available on my web page
http://www.engr.smu.edu/~jlk/
2
Design Software
OPNET Technologies, Inc.
RSoft, Inc.
VPI Systems
ARTIS Software Corp.
TelOptica, Inc.
(Heuristics – No LP No IP)
3
Legitimate Concerns
Hard To Model Some Problems As LPs Or IPs (Polarization Mode Dispersion
Constraints)
Hard To Create Good Optimization Software
(Some Firms Want To Control All Software)
Computational Time Can Be Excessive
Convergence Can Be Slow
Professional Optimization Software Can Be Expensive
4
Issues Faced By Network Designers
(Slide #1)Node-Arc Models – Can Not Control The Hop
Counts
Arc-Path Models – Not All Paths Are Available
Protection For Mesh Networks – Several Possibilities
Dedicated Protection(also called 1+1 protection)
P-Cycle Protection (Grover & Stamatelakis)
Shared Protection
5
Issues Faced By Network Designers
(Slide #2)Uncertainty In The Demand Forecasts
(Nortel Networks Concerned About This)
{From The OR Literature}
Stochastic Programming (Linear)
Mean Value Model (Linear)
Worst Case Model (Linear)
Robust Optimization (Nonlinear)
6
Our Investigation
We created AMPL models addressing all of these issues
and empirically tested our models.
Used AMPL/CPLEX
Used AlphaServer
667 MHz
4096 MB of RAM
7
General Problem Description
Given1. Network Topology
2. Forecast Of Point-To-Point Traffic
Determine1. Routing For The Traffic
2. Equipment Configuration Required
8
7
4
3
1
2
5
6
AtlantaDallas
Chicago
Determine Where To Install Equipment To Light The Dark Fiber
New York
Los Angeles
San Francisco
Boston
9
LTE LTE
LTE LTE
LTE LTE
… …
LTE LTE
LTE LTE
LTE LTE
… …
TE TE
TE TE
TE TE
… …
R R
R R
R R
… …
R R
R R
R R
… …
R R
R R
R R
… …
A A
A A
… …A A
A A
… …A A
A A
… …A A
A A
… …A A
A A
… …A A
A A
… …
LTE LTE
LTE LTE
LTE LTE
… …
LTE LTE
LTE LTE
LTE LTE
… …
TE TE
TE TE
TE TE
… …
R R
R R
R R
… …
R R
R R
R R
… …
R R
R R
R R
… …
A A
A A
… …A A
A A
… …A A
A A
… …A A
A A
… …
Basic Building Block for the WDM Network
Optical Amplifier
Regenerator
10
4
2
1 3
Avoid Crossing Links
origin
destination
Working Path
Backup Path
11
2859
2336
10
3018
2226 33
3 49
17 16 48
394764
2
13
14
65
8 21 6720
10 1542
9
625525
5024
52
4 2760
32
44 46 41
4034
58
5311
57
43
54 7
63
612
61
37
38 56
51
66
3531
2945
5
19
Basic Test Problem (US network with average node degree of 3.15)
12
Cycle Generation ModelGiven
G = [N,E]
origin (o)
destination (d)
integer k
Output
k – shortest paths (unique)
k - backup paths (not unique)
13
Example
4
8
5
7
31 2
6 5
7
31 2
6
4
8
31 2
64
8
5
7
1 2
6