Lecture 17 Page 1 CS 236 Online Prolog to Lecture 17 CS 236 On-Line MS Program Networks and Systems...

8
Lecture 17 Page 1 CS 236 Online Prolog to Lecture 17 CS 236 On-Line MS Program Networks and Systems Security Peter Reiher

description

Lecture 17 Page 3 CS 236 Online Something That Didn’t Work FISMA (Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002) Result of law intended to improve security of government systems –Passed in 2002 Required NIST to set standards Other gov’t agencies needed to document what they did to meet them

Transcript of Lecture 17 Page 1 CS 236 Online Prolog to Lecture 17 CS 236 On-Line MS Program Networks and Systems...

Page 1: Lecture 17 Page 1 CS 236 Online Prolog to Lecture 17 CS 236 On-Line MS Program Networks and Systems Security Peter Reiher.

Lecture 17Page 1CS 236 Online

Prolog to Lecture 17CS 236

On-Line MS ProgramNetworks and Systems Security

Peter Reiher

Page 2: Lecture 17 Page 1 CS 236 Online Prolog to Lecture 17 CS 236 On-Line MS Program Networks and Systems Security Peter Reiher.

Lecture 17Page 2CS 236 Online

Security Evaluations and the US Government

• The US government runs lots of computers and networks

• It’s a big, obvious target– And does get attacked a lot

• We obviously want its systems to be secure

• How to evaluate their system security?

Page 3: Lecture 17 Page 1 CS 236 Online Prolog to Lecture 17 CS 236 On-Line MS Program Networks and Systems Security Peter Reiher.

Lecture 17Page 3CS 236 Online

Something That Didn’t Work• FISMA (Federal Information Security

Management Act of 2002)• Result of law intended to improve security of

government systems– Passed in 2002

• Required NIST to set standards• Other gov’t agencies needed to document what

they did to meet them

Page 4: Lecture 17 Page 1 CS 236 Online Prolog to Lecture 17 CS 236 On-Line MS Program Networks and Systems Security Peter Reiher.

Lecture 17Page 4CS 236 Online

What Happened With FISMA• Turned into an exercise in generating reports• All agencies had to do was write lengthy

reports• Small companies went into business writing

the reports• But most government systems’ security was

not actually improved

Page 5: Lecture 17 Page 1 CS 236 Online Prolog to Lecture 17 CS 236 On-Line MS Program Networks and Systems Security Peter Reiher.

Lecture 17Page 5CS 236 Online

What’s the Lesson For Us?

• Not just that government tends to useless bureaucracy

• Rather, be sure to ask for the right thing from security reviews

• What you really want is to know whether you’re secure

• And what to do to become more so

Page 6: Lecture 17 Page 1 CS 236 Online Prolog to Lecture 17 CS 236 On-Line MS Program Networks and Systems Security Peter Reiher.

Lecture 17Page 6CS 236 Online

What Was the Problem With FISMA?

• Did not force agencies to actually improve security–You just had to write reports

• Did not focus on practical methods of improving security

• Did not take into account dynamic and changing nature of threats

Page 7: Lecture 17 Page 1 CS 236 Online Prolog to Lecture 17 CS 236 On-Line MS Program Networks and Systems Security Peter Reiher.

Lecture 17Page 7CS 236 Online

How Can You Do Better?• If you’re involved in a security evaluation,

keep your eye on the ball• Look at things that strongly affect real security

– In ways relevant to your situation• Consider the real threats you’re facing• Think about and report on where the system

needs to be improved

Page 8: Lecture 17 Page 1 CS 236 Online Prolog to Lecture 17 CS 236 On-Line MS Program Networks and Systems Security Peter Reiher.

Lecture 17Page 8CS 236 Online

The New Government Approach• FISMA 2.0• Moving through US legislature (2010)• Intended to place more emphasis on actually

securing systems– Automated security reporting– Mandating security requirements in contracts– Legislates federal CTO