LECTURE # 12 SUBSTANCE SUBSTANCE & FORM DIACHRONIC AND SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES SUBSTANCE & FORM...
-
Upload
morgan-mccormick -
Category
Documents
-
view
242 -
download
2
Transcript of LECTURE # 12 SUBSTANCE SUBSTANCE & FORM DIACHRONIC AND SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES SUBSTANCE & FORM...
L E C T U R E # 1 2
SUBSTANCE
SUBSTANCE & FORMDIACHRONIC AND SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
SUBSTANCE & FORMDIACHRONY& SYNCHRONY
SUBSTANCE & FORM
• Substance and symbols such as letters of the alphabet that represent sounds in writing are the raw material of a language
• They are the phonic (sounds) and graphic (written) substance of the language.
• They have no meaning in themselves.
SUBSTANCE & FORM
• They become meaningful when they are given a particular shape or order.
• They have meaning when they have some form.
• All distinct sounds produced by human speech organs and written scripts are the substance of human language
SUBSTANCE & FORM
• Cluster of sounds such as /n/, /t/, /e/ is only noise – has no meaning
• It must be suitably arranged into some form to make it meaningful
• When the same sounds arranged into some order i.e /n/ + /e/ + /t/ - We can see some meaning
SUBSTANCE & FORM
• Log of wood has no particular shape, A carpenter makes chairs, tables etc. out of it
• Substance and form – two parts of the quality of language
• Substance, which is the mere sound or word is only the signifier (in Saussure’s terms)
• In order to make sense, it has to be linked with the ‘signified’ – the meaning or the concept
SUBSTANCE & FORM
• Sounds when arranged in a particular order, signify something meaningful;
• words when arranged in a particular order
express some meaningful idea or action; • this means that the arrangement itself gives form
to the substance of the language
SUBSTANCE & FORM
• A further distinction is made between levels of ‘expression’ and ‘content’ in form.
• At one level, the level of expression, linguistics deals with the form or shape of linguistic elements, without considering their meaning.
• This way we might get sentences like ‘the bachelor gave birth to a baby’ – doesn’t make any sense
SUBSTANCE & FORM
• Hence, we have to consider level of content as well i.e. the level of meaning, or semantics
• Form includes both grammar (arrangement of words in a sentence) & Semantics (the meaning relationships between the words)
• Summing up, we can say that substance is the elements or ‘raw materials’ of language – phonemes, morphemes, or graphemes
SUBSTANCE & FORM
• Form is the associative order in which these are brought together in a meaningful way.
• Linguists say that form is the concern of linguistic study, not substance; It is form that makes it possible to study substance.
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• The distinction is between two approaches to the study of language.• The synchronic (‘chronos’ stands for time)
approach sees language as a living whole, existing as a state at one particular time.• The state is an accumulation of all linguistic
activities that a language community engages in during a specific period of time
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• Linguists can collect samples of this language regardless of any historical considerations that might have influenced language at any particular time.
• Once focal point isolated, time factor is irrelevant
• Whatever changes occur during study, are considered irrelevant to the main focus.
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• What is the main focus of study?
• It is the system of language as it exists; the system of inter-relationships that bind together co-existing items in the collective mind of the community
• The diachronic approach traces historical developments.
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• It records the changes that have taken place between successive points in time.
• Diachronic is equivalent to ‘historial’ (Lyons, 1983, p. 35)
• It investigates language changes as they occur from time to time, the evolution of languages
• Diachronic refers to historical developments
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• Saussure (1916) who made this distinction gives priority to synchronic approach.
• He says that the two approaches must be kept separate
• Saussure says that what strikes us first is that their succession in time does not exist as far as a speaker is concerned.
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• For example: A speaker of English is not concerned with the language of middle ages.
• The speaker is concerned with the state of being, the language that exists for him at a given time.
• The speaker does not consider what language existed before or after him
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• Saussure has given inter-relationship of diachrony and synchrony
C A x B D
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• In the above diagram, AB is the synchronic axis of simultaneities – all the facts of language as they co-exist at a particular time
• It is the static axis – doesn’t change. It refers to language as it exists at a particular time
• CD is the diachronic axis of succession – an imaginary line moving through time
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• AB can intersect CD at any point because at any given time, there will be a number of simultaneous facts about language co-existing
• X is the point on CD where a particular point in time can be isolated and language at this particular point can be described (as it exists)
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• Priority of synchronic over diachronic study is explained by Saussure by analogy of the game of chess.
• The chess board constantly changes because of the different moves of the players but anybody walks in at any point, he can understand the state of the game – by the position of the pieces.
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• It doesn’t matter how many moves the players have made before arriving at that stage.
• The game can be described without giving
reference to the earlier moves.
• Rules, agreed upon continue to operate with each move
• Similar rules present in language too
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• Only one piece needs to be moved at a time for each move.
• In language, change affects only isolated elements, not the whole language
• No doubt, these changes ultimately do change the language – case of some words disappearing from a language and some new words entering
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• Just as succession of moves changes the final results of the game.
• However, at each point in the game all the pieces exist relative to each other and their ultimate fate can not be predicted at that point of the game.
• Likewise all the sounds in words exist relative to each other.
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• Likewise different words in sentences exist relative to each other and so on.
• In the process of language formation, we can not say what their exact place would be finally.
• So, language can and should be described synchronically – on its own terms without referring to its past or future shape
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• The question arises: should historical study not be done? Or should diachronic perspective not be considered?
• Saussure says that although diachronic aspect is not related to the language system, it does affect or condition the system.
• He just wants to keep them separate.
DIACHRONIC & SYNCHRONIC APPROACHES
• He says that language is a complex system of values.
• We may confuse synchronic approach while thinking about the historical perspective
• In order to give historical studies a valid base, good clear synchronic study is important
SUMMARY
• Substance and symbols (letters of the alphabet) are raw material of language
• They become meaningful when given a particular shape or order.
• A one level we consider only the form or shape
• At another we consider the level of meaning
SUMMARY
• A combination of both gives us a meaningful form.
Diachronic & Synchronic Approaches• Diachronic approach related with development of
language over different ages
• Synchronic approach related with the shape of language at a specific time without considering its shape in the past or future