LearningStudio Audit Results

5
Mod 7 LearningStudio Audit

description

To better improve our pedagogy, we must be aligned in our standards. The purpose of this audit is to find inconsistencies within the standards that were set fourth. By knowing where problem areas are, we can take steps in improving our pedagogy. Method of Data Gathering: Instructors were picked at random from various courses No instructor was audited twice No class was audited twice Gathered the data on Thursday of Week 3 The data gathered was from Weeks 1 & 2

Transcript of LearningStudio Audit Results

Page 1: LearningStudio Audit Results

Mod 7LearningStudio Audit

Page 2: LearningStudio Audit Results

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

A B C D E F G H I J K L

YES NO

LearningStudio Audit Results

A Syllabus: Is your syllabus present with correct grade breakdown and does it match the grade book? 55%

B Syllabus: Does your grade book add to 1,000 points and 100%? 60%

C Syllabus and Shell: Have you flushed out irrelevant information? 65%

D Syllabus and Shell: Instructor contact info present both on syllabus and Course Home? 85%

E Shell: Is only one syllabus present in your LearningStudio? 85%

F Shell: Does the Course Home navigation tree have: Syllabus, Student Research & Resource Library, Grading, SMARTHINKING, SHARC, Course Questions, Instructor

80%

G Shell: Introduce Yourself link present with updated instructor bio? 55%

H Discussion Board: Is the requirements for discussion post present? 60%

I Dropbox: Do you use the Turnitin option? 40%

J Grade Book: "Participation" is added (do not use "attendance") 65%

K Grade Book: Balanced to 1000 Points and 100% (not including extra credit) 55%

L Grade Book: Are all grades posted? 75%

Page 3: LearningStudio Audit Results

List of top items out of compliance

1. Instructor does not use Turnitin.com 2.Grade book is not balanced to 1000 points & 100%3. Syllabus does not have the correct grade breakdown4. Introduce Yourself does not have instructor bio5. Syllabus does not have balanced points & weights (the chart)6. Requirements for discussion board are not present7. Syllabus has irrelevant information8. Participation is not in grade book or renamed incorrectly9. Only 75% of instructors have updated their grade book for week 2 (as of Wednesday of Week 3)

The average score of all compliance category is 65%Meaning out of all the instructors audited, only 65% of the standards were meant.

Page 4: LearningStudio Audit Results

Discussion Post Participation Rate*

(Week 1)50%

Average Time In LearningStudio

14. Hours and 40 Minutes

Other findings

*Answers the question,“How often did the instructor participate in the discussion board?”

Page 5: LearningStudio Audit Results

CONCLUSION

We need to develop an action plan to get everyone following the standards.