Learning Theories Week Five – Part 1. Agenda Check-in Discussion of Assignment 2 experience...
-
Upload
jayson-barrett -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Learning Theories Week Five – Part 1. Agenda Check-in Discussion of Assignment 2 experience...
Learning Theories
Week Five – Part 1
Agenda
Check-inDiscussion of Assignment 2 experienceContext and setting of learningCategories of learning theoriesIntelligencesLearning StylesModels of Teaching
Info Lit Interviews
Turn and talk aboutOne thing that was confirmedOne thing that was a surpriseAn idea you had from the interview
How does this knowledge affect how you will teach information literacy?
The Context of Learning
People and their Lives
Social and Historical Influences
Current Conditions
Emerging Challenges
and Opportunities
John Bransford
Where Does Learning Happen?
The LIFE Center
Where does our instruction fit?
Four Basic Philosophies
The BehavioristsBased on observable changes in behavior
The CognitivistsBased on the thought process behind the behavior
The ConstructivistsBased on the belief that we all construct our perspective of the world and learning experiences. That is, we problem solve.
The Socioculturists Based in the idea that learning is situated in the
learning community and the sociocultural experience of the individual
Behaviorists
Pavlov – Classic and Operant Conditioning Thorndike – Active Learning & Trial and Error Skinner – Practice stimulus response Expose the student to the subject in gradual steps Require that the learner make a response and receive
immediate feedback Arrange the difficulty of the questions so the response
is always correct and hence a positive reinforcement Information should be presented in small amounts so
that responses can be reinforced ("shaping") Belief that behavior can be modified
Behaviorist instruction
The task would be clearly defined. Objectives would be set The learning events would be listed in
sequence of increased difficulty You would constantly reinforce desired
learning outcomes Evaluation would include a checklist of skills Instruction could be programmed to be the
same for all situations.
Cognitivists
Piaget’s 4 Stages Sensorimotor (0-2)
Physical interaction Objects out of sight don’t exist
Preoperational (2-7) Needs concrete interaction Not abstract thinkers
Concrete Operational (7-11) Logical sequence to explain their experiences Mathematic equations can be solved without objects
Formal Operations (11 and up) Reasoning Abstract insights
Child development and learning Emphasis on the importance of play Background biology and philosophy Cognitive development enhanced by experiences
Cognitivist Instruction
Conduct a cognitive task analysis. Find out what they know
You would teach complex problems but you would have clear objectives
A series of learning events would be designed. Each stage the learners would be challenged to identify what they know and what they will need to know to solve the problem.
Evaluation is driven by how well the learner feels they have achieved
Instruction and material must be relevant to this group.
Constructivists Vygotsky – Scaffolding and Zone of Proximal
Development Bruner – Learning is an active experience
Learner transforms information, constructs hypotheses, makes decisions, Cognitive structure (i.e., schema, mental models) provides
meaning and organization to experiences Reflect on experiences Problem-solving; open ended questions
Concepts must be presented When the student is ready to learn In a way that is accessible to the student or easy for the
student to learn new material (fun) To fill in the gaps When it is relevant to them
Constructivists Instruction
Analyze the tools for learning and the environment Objectives are determined in collaboration with the
learner. As with cognitivists, a series of learning events would
be designed. At each stage the learners would be challenged to identify what they know and what they will need to know to solve the problem.
Evaluation is based on self assessment All learning must be related to the learners own
experiences
Socioculturists
Vygotsky Social Development of the Mind
Leont’ev and Luria Activity Theory or Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT)
Latour Actor-Network Theory
Lave and Wenger Situated Learning
Legitimate peripheral practice Master and apprentice
Moll and Moje Funds of Knowledge Third Space
Lee Cultural Modeling
New Literacies Lea and Street – Academic Literacies
Socioculturists Instruction
Know your studentsFind ways to draw out their experiencesLet them give examples from their lives
Provide opportunities for apprenticeshipAcknowledge the power structure and
real life tensionsBeware of privileging one kind of
knowledge over another
Learning Styles
Assumption: everyone can learn Style partly based on heredity and upbringing We perceive and process experiences and
information in different ways All styles need to be experienced, but Individuals will work better in their own area Personality or learning style? (example Myers-
Briggs) Many tests online. Look for “learning style
inventory” and see what you find!
Erik Erickson
Erik Erickson
3 Most Common Categories
Visual LearnersAuditory LearnersKinesthetic (Tactile) Learners
Some add in “Reading/Writing Preference” Learners (See VARK model)
Kolb Model
Converger Characterized by abstract conceptualization and active experimentation. They
are good at making practical applications of ideas and using deductive reasoning to solve problems
Diverger Tend toward concrete experience and reflective observation. They are
imaginative and are good at coming up with ideas and seeing things from different perspectives
Assimilator Characterized by abstract conceptualization and reflective observation. They
are capable of creating theoretical models by means of inductive reasoning
Accommodator Use concrete experience and active experimentation. They are good at
actively engaging with the world and actually doing things instead of merely reading about and studying them
McCarthy’s 4 Styles
Type one: WHY? Needs to be relevant and personal to them. Teacher needs to create a reason. What do I know already? How does this fit in with what I know already? Enjoys brainstorming , listing, recording, charting, relating a past experience
Type two: WHAT? Primarily interested in facts as they led to conceptual understanding. Give them facts. Look for gaps in their knowledge. “What more do I need to know?” Enjoys defining, explaining, classifying, comparing, reporting, advertising
Type three: HOW? Interested in how things work. Teachers need to let them try it. Look for ways of applying what they already know Enjoy demonstrating, interpreting, constructing, making models, mapping, collage,
giving a talk
Type 4: WHAT IF? Primarily interested in self discovery. Let them teach it to themselves and others Looks beyond what they have learnt or need to know Enjoys predicting, improving, developing, inventing, judging, recommending,
developing an action plan
Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences – “Human cognition in its fullest.”
Linguistic intelligence involves sensitivity to spoken and written language, the ability to learn languages, and the capacity to use language to accomplish certain goals. This intelligence includes the ability to effectively use language to express oneself rhetorically or poetically; and language as a means to remember information.
Logical-mathematical intelligence consists of the capacity to analyze problems logically, carry out mathematical operations, and investigate issues scientifically. It entails the ability to detect patterns, reason deductively and think logically.
Musical intelligence involves skill in the performance, composition, and appreciation of musical patterns. It encompasses the capacity to recognize and compose musical pitches, tones, and rhythms.
Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence entails the potential of using one's whole body or parts of the body to solve problems. It is the ability to use mental abilities to coordinate bodily movements.
Spatial intelligence involves the potential to recognize and use the patterns of wide space and more confined areas.
Interpersonal intelligence is concerned with the capacity to understand the intentions, motivations and desires of other people. It allows people to work effectively with others.
Intrapersonal intelligence entails the capacity to understand oneself, to appreciate one's feelings, fears and motivations. It involves having an effective working model of ourselves, and to be able to use such information to regulate our lives.
Wrap-up
Way you design your program depends on the way you see your learners
No single best philosophy – brain research may confirm or change what we know!
Good teacher varies techniques and strategies For example:
Active reflectors: learn by thinking Vary assignment
Concrete / abstract: direct experience Vary instruction
Class Discussion
What learning theories make the most sense to you based on your experiences as a learner and in giving instruction?
How has metacognition played a role in your own learning?
Is there a reading that really resonated with you? Why?
Please ask questions if anything in the reading or lectures are unclear to you.
Next up
Models of Teaching