Chaos, Communication and Consciousness Module PH19510 Lecture 16 Chaos.
Learning Chaos
-
Upload
naeem-akhtar -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Learning Chaos
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
1/15
UNIT EC449
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
Semester 1 2000
Lecturer: K. Hinde
Room: 427 Northumberland BuildingTel: 0191 2273936Email: [email protected] Page: http://www.unn.ac.uk/~egv8
WEEK4
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
2/15
Kevin Hinde. 1999/2000. C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\MSc\SMLECTURE3INTRO.doc
IntroductionIn this lecture we will examine the concept of a learningorganisation and organisational learning. I will also talk aboutorganisations as chaotic systems. Thus we are trying toexamine the organisation in a dynamic environmentundergoing dramatic changes. This is different from aplanning perspective or viewing the organisation as evolving
incrementally. Here environmental change is seen as lessturbulent. This, of course, means that we are examining thedifficulties arising when managing change, something I comeback to in later lectures but which needs addressing now.
So by the end of this lecture you should have a preliminaryunderstanding of the concepts relating to organisational
learning and chaos.
Please read the attached slides and take notes from the on-line articles. These should enhance your understanding of theconcept of the learning organisation. For those of you whohave knowledge of the learning organisation concept fromyour work experiences please share it with us.
On Line Activities
Task 1
Go to the following website:
The Society for Organisational Learning at MIT.
It contains a variety of papers on the concept of organisationallearning (particularly the research section).
Examine the papers by Schein and Senge and consider thefollowing questions.
1. What does organisational learning mean?
2. How are learning and organisational culture linked?
3. How are leaders supposed to facilitate organisationallearning?
Task 2
Use a search engine to find other papers on the concepts ofthe Learning Organisation.
http://learning.mit.edu/res/kr/index.htmlhttp://learning.mit.edu/res/kr/index.htmlhttp://learning.mit.edu/res/kr/index.html -
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
3/15
15/02/00 K.Hinde 1
Learning Organisations
Definition
Varies from author to author (see sheet)
What is the distinction between learning organisationand organisational learning?
The LO is an aspiration - a view of what might bepossible.(End)
OL is the activity and the process by which organisations
reach their ideal. (Means) Note we are examining organisations undergoing
transformational change.
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
4/15
15/02/00 K.Hinde 2
Learning Organisations - re: Morgan
Do organisations have Brains (Morgan, 1997)?
With bounded rationality managers have to searchfor solutions, perhaps randomly, with rationalexplanations being sought after the event.
Garbage Can model of decision making develops.(March)
Borrowing from cybernetics organisational theoristshave developed the ideas of single and doublelooped learning.
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
5/15
15/02/00 K.Hinde 3
Step 1
Step 3 Step 2
Single Loop Learning: Making sense of the existing
paradigm and correcting resulting errors
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
6/15
15/02/00 K.Hinde 4
Step 1
Step 3 Step 2
Step 2a
Key
Step 1 = the process of sensing, scanning and monitoring the
environment.
Step 2 = the comparison of this information against the
operating norms.
Step 2a = the process of questioning whether the operatingnorms are appropriate
Step 3 = the process of initiating the appropriate action.
Double Loop Learning: Taking a double look at the situation
and questioning the paradigm
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
7/15
15/02/00 K.Hinde 5
Negative and positive feedback are important
aspects of the learning process. It is only byaccepting errors are possible that managers canensure that strategic direction involves inclusive
ownership.
Thus, there is a need for managers to
encourage the emergent organisation create designs that facilitate learning.
Learning organisations involve all members of theorganisation sharing information and knowledge.
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
8/15
15/02/00 K.Hinde 6
PSOs and the LO
What factors encourage moves towards a LO inpublic services?
Pressures from without
Pressures from within
Legitimisation - treating citizens as clients?
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
9/15
15/02/00 K.Hinde 7
Chaos
organisations are complex systems in a constantstate of flux and transformation; they are complexnon-linear systems. (Stacey, 1997)
despite all the unpredictability, coherent orderalwaysemerges out of the randomness and surfacechaos (Morgan, 1997).
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
10/15
15/02/00 K.Hinde 8
Chaos (2) An important aspect of chaos is that we need to
understand the concept of attractors. Some pull a
system into equilibrium or near equilibrium; forexample, as a result of negative feedback loopswhich counteract destabilising fluctuations.
Other attractors flip a system into completely newconfigurations. The system is then pushed far from
its original equilibrium point. These departures arebifurcation points.
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
11/15
15/02/00 K.Hinde 9
Chaos (3)
To manage in the midst of complexity it is important
to rethink what we mean by organisation, especiallythe nature of hierarchy and control
to learn the art of managing and changing contexts learn how to use small changes to create large
effects
to live with continuous transformation and emergentorder as a natural state of affairs
So are we ever in control?
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
12/15
15/02/00 K.Hinde 10
Chaos (4) Ordinary management can only be practised in closed or
contained change situations (Stacey, 1997, p.71).
This requires knowledge of rational processes to secureharmony, fit, or convergence to a configuration that can onlyproceed incrementally.
Where a change of strategic direction is required ExtraordinaryManagement must be practised.
This requires the use of intuitive, political, group learning modes
of decision-making control in situations of open-ended change,Stacey (1997, p.72).
Managers have to understand and develop the shadowsystem.
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
13/15
Kevin Hinde. 1999/2000. C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\MSc\SMLECTURE3INTRO.doc
Author(s)(Year)
Definition of OL Who? (subject ofOL)
What? (content ofOL)
When?(incentives forOL)
With what results?(Efficiency of OL)
How? (Processes ofOL)
Cyert andMarch(1963)
OL is adaptive behaviour oforganisations over time
Aggregate level oforganisation
Standardoperatingprocedures andorganisationalrules
SlackResources
Adaptation tochangingenvironmental states;improved adaptationas prerequisite forsurvival
Adaptation of goals,attention, andsearch rules;learning fromexperience.
Cangelosi and Dill(1965)
OL consists of a series ofinteractions between adaptationat the individual, or subgroup leveland adaptation at theorganisational level.
Individuals andsubgroups inorganisations
Complexmanagementdecisions
Stressstimulateslearning, bothsubsystemlearning andtotal systemlearning,separately and
together.
Reduction of stress,and improveddecision-making
Adaptation toconflicting patternsof behaviour causedby stress
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
14/15
Kevin Hinde. 1999/2000. C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\MSc\SMLECTURE3INTRO.doc
Argyris
andSchon(1978)
OL is the process by which
organisational memebers detecterrors or anomalies and correctthem by restructuringorganisational theory-in-use.
Individual learning
in organisations
Organisational
theories-in-use ortheories-of action
Match or
mismatch ofexpectedoutcomes whichconfirms ordiscreditsorganisationaltheories-in-use
Link between learning
and improved action
Assumption sharing;
individual andcollective enquiryconstructs andmodifies theories-in-use; exact processremains unclear.
DuncanandWeiss(1979)
OL is defined as the processwithin the organisation by whichknowledge about action-outcomerelationships and the effect of theenvironment on these
relationships is developed.
The individual is theonly entity who canlearn. However,they must be seenas a part of a
system of learningwith exchanges ofwhat is learnedamong individuals
Organisationalknowledge base
Slack resources Depends on availableorganisationalknowledge for decisionmaking; adaptation tochanging
environmental states
Development ofaction-outcomerelations via
(a) sharing
(b) evaluation(c) integration
Fiol andLyles(1985)
OL means the process ofimproving actions through betterknowledge and understanding
OL is not simply thesum of individuallearning
Patterns ofcognitiveassociationsand/or newresponses or
actions (cognitivevs. behaviouralchange)
Tensionbetweenconstancy andchange; crisis(especially for
higher levellearning)
Environmentalalignment; futureperformanceimprovement
Lower level learningas repetition of pastbehaviour, higherlevel learning asdevelopment of
complexassociations
-
7/31/2019 Learning Chaos
15/15
Kevin Hinde. 1999/2000. C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\MSc\SMLECTURE3INTRO.doc
Levitt and
March(1988)
Organisations are seen as
learning by encoding inferencesfrom history into routine behaviour
OL is more than
individual learning,that there is anemergentcomponent
Routines (which
include: rule,procedures,frameworks,cultures, beliefstructures,paradigms, etc.)
Outcomes in
response toaspiration level
Adaptation to
changingenvironmental states;balance betweenexploration andexploitation
Learning from direct
experience; learningfrom the experienceof others, learningof paradigms forinterpretation.
Huber(1991)
An entity learns if, through theprocess of information, the rangeof its potential behaviours is
changed (L)et us assume thatan organisation learns if any of itsunits acquires knowledge that itrecognises as potentially useful tothe organisation
Concept of entity,which includesindividuals, groups,
organisations,industries, society.
Information/knowledge
Probably notintended asauthor aims at
describing awhole range oflearningsubcategories
Range of potentialbehaviour change, notnecessarily resulting in
observable results
InformationProcessing:acquisition,
distribution,interpretation andstorage ofinformation; therelated proceses ofOL remainunspecified
Weickand
Roberts(1993)
OL consists of interrelatingactions of individuals, that is their
heedful interrelation whichresults in a collective mind
Connectionsbetween
behaviours ratherthan people
Behaviour/actions Necessity fornearly, error-
free operations,e.g. aircraftcarriers
Decrease oforganisational errors
Heedful interrelatingvia
(1) contribution(2) representation(3) subordination
Source: Prange C (1999) Organisational Learning Desperately Seeking Theory?, in Organisational Learning and the LearningOrganisation. Developments in Theory and Practice, edited by Easterby-Smith M, Burgoyne J and Araujo L, Sage, London.