Learning Chaos

download Learning Chaos

of 15

Transcript of Learning Chaos

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    1/15

    UNIT EC449

    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT

    Semester 1 2000

    Lecturer: K. Hinde

    Room: 427 Northumberland BuildingTel: 0191 2273936Email: [email protected] Page: http://www.unn.ac.uk/~egv8

    WEEK4

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    2/15

    Kevin Hinde. 1999/2000. C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\MSc\SMLECTURE3INTRO.doc

    IntroductionIn this lecture we will examine the concept of a learningorganisation and organisational learning. I will also talk aboutorganisations as chaotic systems. Thus we are trying toexamine the organisation in a dynamic environmentundergoing dramatic changes. This is different from aplanning perspective or viewing the organisation as evolving

    incrementally. Here environmental change is seen as lessturbulent. This, of course, means that we are examining thedifficulties arising when managing change, something I comeback to in later lectures but which needs addressing now.

    So by the end of this lecture you should have a preliminaryunderstanding of the concepts relating to organisational

    learning and chaos.

    Please read the attached slides and take notes from the on-line articles. These should enhance your understanding of theconcept of the learning organisation. For those of you whohave knowledge of the learning organisation concept fromyour work experiences please share it with us.

    On Line Activities

    Task 1

    Go to the following website:

    The Society for Organisational Learning at MIT.

    It contains a variety of papers on the concept of organisationallearning (particularly the research section).

    Examine the papers by Schein and Senge and consider thefollowing questions.

    1. What does organisational learning mean?

    2. How are learning and organisational culture linked?

    3. How are leaders supposed to facilitate organisationallearning?

    Task 2

    Use a search engine to find other papers on the concepts ofthe Learning Organisation.

    http://learning.mit.edu/res/kr/index.htmlhttp://learning.mit.edu/res/kr/index.htmlhttp://learning.mit.edu/res/kr/index.html
  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    3/15

    15/02/00 K.Hinde 1

    Learning Organisations

    Definition

    Varies from author to author (see sheet)

    What is the distinction between learning organisationand organisational learning?

    The LO is an aspiration - a view of what might bepossible.(End)

    OL is the activity and the process by which organisations

    reach their ideal. (Means) Note we are examining organisations undergoing

    transformational change.

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    4/15

    15/02/00 K.Hinde 2

    Learning Organisations - re: Morgan

    Do organisations have Brains (Morgan, 1997)?

    With bounded rationality managers have to searchfor solutions, perhaps randomly, with rationalexplanations being sought after the event.

    Garbage Can model of decision making develops.(March)

    Borrowing from cybernetics organisational theoristshave developed the ideas of single and doublelooped learning.

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    5/15

    15/02/00 K.Hinde 3

    Step 1

    Step 3 Step 2

    Single Loop Learning: Making sense of the existing

    paradigm and correcting resulting errors

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    6/15

    15/02/00 K.Hinde 4

    Step 1

    Step 3 Step 2

    Step 2a

    Key

    Step 1 = the process of sensing, scanning and monitoring the

    environment.

    Step 2 = the comparison of this information against the

    operating norms.

    Step 2a = the process of questioning whether the operatingnorms are appropriate

    Step 3 = the process of initiating the appropriate action.

    Double Loop Learning: Taking a double look at the situation

    and questioning the paradigm

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    7/15

    15/02/00 K.Hinde 5

    Negative and positive feedback are important

    aspects of the learning process. It is only byaccepting errors are possible that managers canensure that strategic direction involves inclusive

    ownership.

    Thus, there is a need for managers to

    encourage the emergent organisation create designs that facilitate learning.

    Learning organisations involve all members of theorganisation sharing information and knowledge.

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    8/15

    15/02/00 K.Hinde 6

    PSOs and the LO

    What factors encourage moves towards a LO inpublic services?

    Pressures from without

    Pressures from within

    Legitimisation - treating citizens as clients?

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    9/15

    15/02/00 K.Hinde 7

    Chaos

    organisations are complex systems in a constantstate of flux and transformation; they are complexnon-linear systems. (Stacey, 1997)

    despite all the unpredictability, coherent orderalwaysemerges out of the randomness and surfacechaos (Morgan, 1997).

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    10/15

    15/02/00 K.Hinde 8

    Chaos (2) An important aspect of chaos is that we need to

    understand the concept of attractors. Some pull a

    system into equilibrium or near equilibrium; forexample, as a result of negative feedback loopswhich counteract destabilising fluctuations.

    Other attractors flip a system into completely newconfigurations. The system is then pushed far from

    its original equilibrium point. These departures arebifurcation points.

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    11/15

    15/02/00 K.Hinde 9

    Chaos (3)

    To manage in the midst of complexity it is important

    to rethink what we mean by organisation, especiallythe nature of hierarchy and control

    to learn the art of managing and changing contexts learn how to use small changes to create large

    effects

    to live with continuous transformation and emergentorder as a natural state of affairs

    So are we ever in control?

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    12/15

    15/02/00 K.Hinde 10

    Chaos (4) Ordinary management can only be practised in closed or

    contained change situations (Stacey, 1997, p.71).

    This requires knowledge of rational processes to secureharmony, fit, or convergence to a configuration that can onlyproceed incrementally.

    Where a change of strategic direction is required ExtraordinaryManagement must be practised.

    This requires the use of intuitive, political, group learning modes

    of decision-making control in situations of open-ended change,Stacey (1997, p.72).

    Managers have to understand and develop the shadowsystem.

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    13/15

    Kevin Hinde. 1999/2000. C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\MSc\SMLECTURE3INTRO.doc

    Author(s)(Year)

    Definition of OL Who? (subject ofOL)

    What? (content ofOL)

    When?(incentives forOL)

    With what results?(Efficiency of OL)

    How? (Processes ofOL)

    Cyert andMarch(1963)

    OL is adaptive behaviour oforganisations over time

    Aggregate level oforganisation

    Standardoperatingprocedures andorganisationalrules

    SlackResources

    Adaptation tochangingenvironmental states;improved adaptationas prerequisite forsurvival

    Adaptation of goals,attention, andsearch rules;learning fromexperience.

    Cangelosi and Dill(1965)

    OL consists of a series ofinteractions between adaptationat the individual, or subgroup leveland adaptation at theorganisational level.

    Individuals andsubgroups inorganisations

    Complexmanagementdecisions

    Stressstimulateslearning, bothsubsystemlearning andtotal systemlearning,separately and

    together.

    Reduction of stress,and improveddecision-making

    Adaptation toconflicting patternsof behaviour causedby stress

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    14/15

    Kevin Hinde. 1999/2000. C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\MSc\SMLECTURE3INTRO.doc

    Argyris

    andSchon(1978)

    OL is the process by which

    organisational memebers detecterrors or anomalies and correctthem by restructuringorganisational theory-in-use.

    Individual learning

    in organisations

    Organisational

    theories-in-use ortheories-of action

    Match or

    mismatch ofexpectedoutcomes whichconfirms ordiscreditsorganisationaltheories-in-use

    Link between learning

    and improved action

    Assumption sharing;

    individual andcollective enquiryconstructs andmodifies theories-in-use; exact processremains unclear.

    DuncanandWeiss(1979)

    OL is defined as the processwithin the organisation by whichknowledge about action-outcomerelationships and the effect of theenvironment on these

    relationships is developed.

    The individual is theonly entity who canlearn. However,they must be seenas a part of a

    system of learningwith exchanges ofwhat is learnedamong individuals

    Organisationalknowledge base

    Slack resources Depends on availableorganisationalknowledge for decisionmaking; adaptation tochanging

    environmental states

    Development ofaction-outcomerelations via

    (a) sharing

    (b) evaluation(c) integration

    Fiol andLyles(1985)

    OL means the process ofimproving actions through betterknowledge and understanding

    OL is not simply thesum of individuallearning

    Patterns ofcognitiveassociationsand/or newresponses or

    actions (cognitivevs. behaviouralchange)

    Tensionbetweenconstancy andchange; crisis(especially for

    higher levellearning)

    Environmentalalignment; futureperformanceimprovement

    Lower level learningas repetition of pastbehaviour, higherlevel learning asdevelopment of

    complexassociations

  • 7/31/2019 Learning Chaos

    15/15

    Kevin Hinde. 1999/2000. C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP\MSc\SMLECTURE3INTRO.doc

    Levitt and

    March(1988)

    Organisations are seen as

    learning by encoding inferencesfrom history into routine behaviour

    OL is more than

    individual learning,that there is anemergentcomponent

    Routines (which

    include: rule,procedures,frameworks,cultures, beliefstructures,paradigms, etc.)

    Outcomes in

    response toaspiration level

    Adaptation to

    changingenvironmental states;balance betweenexploration andexploitation

    Learning from direct

    experience; learningfrom the experienceof others, learningof paradigms forinterpretation.

    Huber(1991)

    An entity learns if, through theprocess of information, the rangeof its potential behaviours is

    changed (L)et us assume thatan organisation learns if any of itsunits acquires knowledge that itrecognises as potentially useful tothe organisation

    Concept of entity,which includesindividuals, groups,

    organisations,industries, society.

    Information/knowledge

    Probably notintended asauthor aims at

    describing awhole range oflearningsubcategories

    Range of potentialbehaviour change, notnecessarily resulting in

    observable results

    InformationProcessing:acquisition,

    distribution,interpretation andstorage ofinformation; therelated proceses ofOL remainunspecified

    Weickand

    Roberts(1993)

    OL consists of interrelatingactions of individuals, that is their

    heedful interrelation whichresults in a collective mind

    Connectionsbetween

    behaviours ratherthan people

    Behaviour/actions Necessity fornearly, error-

    free operations,e.g. aircraftcarriers

    Decrease oforganisational errors

    Heedful interrelatingvia

    (1) contribution(2) representation(3) subordination

    Source: Prange C (1999) Organisational Learning Desperately Seeking Theory?, in Organisational Learning and the LearningOrganisation. Developments in Theory and Practice, edited by Easterby-Smith M, Burgoyne J and Araujo L, Sage, London.